The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 38    Average: 3.1/5]
45 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 16314
Rating: 3.1
Category: Science
Date: 08/26/11 08:01 AM

45 Responses to Starchild Skull Not Human

  1. Profile photo of SamWise050
    SamWise050 Male 18-29
    12 posts
    August 25, 2011 at 5:09 pm
    Link: Starchild Skull Not Human - DNA testing has been done and may possibly be recorded as the first alien DNA sample.
  2. Profile photo of simonh92
    simonh92 Male 18-29
    193 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:12 am
    What about the other members of Kiss? Are they human?
  3. Profile photo of drworm2002
    drworm2002 Male 30-39
    662 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:15 am
    THis is was found to be human by DNA, this video is crap.

    DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD (Bureau of Legal Dentistry), a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes"
  4. Profile photo of Ratdog993
    Ratdog993 Female 18-29
    158 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:20 am

    Yes it is human.
  5. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36835 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:35 am

    Of course it`s human.
    But the mind is from the aliens who put the monolith on the moon.

  6. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:38 am
    Swing and a miss...
  7. Profile photo of EgalM
    EgalM Male 30-39
    1707 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:46 am
    I find it funny how all Aliens have human like skulls. Heck, there`s no reason to believe they`d even have bones like we do, they could be almost anything. Not saying there is or isn`t aliens, but why would they visit here a couple times and bugger off? If I traveled all that distance I think I would setup an outpost, or mine for resources that my planet doesn`t have. Some people will do anything to disprove God, why not just live your life and ignore the religious types?
  8. Profile photo of sepia-tenshi
    sepia-tenshi Female 18-29
    353 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:47 am
    i want to see a facial reconstruction of that skull
  9. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 8:55 am
    Not sure how much of a reliable of a source this "Discl0sur3" thing can be
  10. Profile photo of maxxim
    maxxim Male 30-39
    125 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 9:36 am
    I watched a special on this skull on the history channel a few days ago. This whole video is bunk, it was an oddity caused by megalencephaly.

    Not saying the history channel is always correct, but they showed the tests that this video talks about, and unless they staged the tests... then it was just a really early example of a disease that persists today.

    And they did a facial reconstruction, sepia, so if you want to see it I`m sure it can be found in google images search.
  11. Profile photo of Altaru
    Altaru Male 18-29
    3483 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 9:44 am
    It`s a deformity, for f*ck`s sake. I mean really?

    You can actually see things like this happening today. Fluid builds up in the brain cavity, and since the skull isn`t "set" at that age, it expands and starts to deform.

    Bad "scientists" will do anything to come to the conclusion they want.

    As for the DNA, previous DNA tests have shown it to be human, and I could take any NUMBER of tiny quotes out of context in scientific documents to make them mean what I want them too.
  12. Profile photo of beternal
    beternal Male 18-29
    2589 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 9:45 am
    for a more genetics-based explanation: Link

    ok, so there are lots of mtDNA variations but still, you`re using DNA!!! - would that really be consistent with extra-terrestrial life? - unless life on earth was seeded from extra-terrestrial DNA... or vice versa... hmmm...
  13. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 10:33 am
    "As for the DNA, previous DNA tests have shown it to be human"

    Previous, out of date, can no longer be used (like your genetics degree). New test says it is not human. Thus we must assume the more accurate modern test results are the correct results.
  14. Profile photo of NNoamfer
    NNoamfer Male 18-29
    1216 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 10:40 am
    I`m skeptic about those tests. There is a reason why it`s a child, because he died of an early, because of an obvious deformity.

    How can an alien breath through such a tight nose? And the eyes surely won`t be funsctional with those sockets... For an eye to move around normally it need to be spherical.
  15. Profile photo of NNoamfer
    NNoamfer Male 18-29
    1216 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 10:43 am
    Even if it isn`t human, it could be a deformed ape too. There`s just no way this skull is functional.
  16. Profile photo of redspade
    redspade Male 13-17
    150 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 11:20 am
    I get why people are skeptical, it is a very radical theory, but come on! stop taking all the fun out of it!
  17. Profile photo of LoofahBoy
    LoofahBoy Male 18-29
    3301 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 11:34 am
    ALIENS. DONT. HAVE. DNA. It`s now how evolution works, for drats sake.
  18. Profile photo of ggolbez
    ggolbez Male 18-29
    1933 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 11:41 am
    Science does not work as follows:

    Get odd object. Test it to see if it fits norm. Object does not fit norm. IT`S FU CKING ALIENS, MAN!

  19. Profile photo of Heureux
    Heureux Male 40-49
    1054 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 11:46 am
    900 years is time for lots of contamination.
  20. Profile photo of junkaroo
    junkaroo Male 30-39
    234 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 11:56 am
    "ALIENS. DONT. HAVE. DNA. It`s no(T) how evolution works, for drats sake."

    Oh poo i forgot you`re professor of alien facts!! For a second I thought you were just a moron what with the claim that DNA is `not how evolution works`...

    Get to the back of the line and STFU.
  21. Profile photo of daverazor
    daverazor Male 50-59
    198 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 12:00 pm
    Well I am smarter than most of these experts and I don`t agree
  22. Profile photo of LandoGriffin
    LandoGriffin Male 30-39
    3844 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 12:08 pm
    I don`t feel like sitting through the whole ten minute video, so forgive me if this was addressed in the vid, but how does one jump from non-human DNA to "alien" - what about all the other Earth animals, viruses that can alter cells, and/or mutated or otherwise altered DNA?
  23. Profile photo of madduck
    madduck Female 50-59
    7605 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 12:22 pm
    So no chance it is a deformed and mutated ape or human then?
  24. Profile photo of kouish
    kouish Male 13-17
    90 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 12:40 pm
    :( i cant watch the video.
  25. Profile photo of PringleMan
    PringleMan Female 13-17
    1356 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 12:55 pm
    the video says the starchilds mitochondrial DNA is human and the DNA in the nucleus is not human. Also it`s improbable that it`s just some mutation. Mutations happen on a very small scale, often unnoticeable, and often happen when cell replication is fastest (as a fetus) which means if any dangerous mutation happened (haha, one that completely wiped out any recognizable sequence of human DNA) the kid would`ve died as a fetus.

    Anyway, I`m sceptical. According to the video, there are too many dissimilarities to categorize it as human. (But they could be lying). And according to Ratdog993, the starchild is a Native American child that suffered from hydrocephalus, giving it a weird skull shape. His mitochondrial DNA came from a different haplogroup from the woman assumed to be his mother, but it was a haplogroup found among Natives. And his Y-chromosome says his father must be human.

    I don`t think starchild`s an alien, probably because aliens should loo
  26. Profile photo of PringleMan
    PringleMan Female 13-17
    1356 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 12:57 pm
    k something like a jellyfish.
  27. Profile photo of Cartunze
    Cartunze Male 60-69
    841 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 1:01 pm
    :( i cant watch the video.

    You just saved a few minutes. Most of the rest of us just stopped watching after a few minutes by choice.
  28. Profile photo of MCMXCIII
    MCMXCIII Male 18-29
    356 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 1:30 pm
    "Alien" is one plausible explanation, but in no way it is the only explanation. I`m still skeptical.
  29. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 1:52 pm
    The abscence of explanation does not imply the truth of otherworldly origin. Look up Micheal Shermer, he`s very nerdy, but knows his stuff.
  30. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 2:41 pm
    Ok... well what does this change?
  31. Profile photo of Klamz
    Klamz Male 18-29
    689 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 2:55 pm
    While I tend not to believe anybody without very clear facts and numerous supporters behind them I will also say I don`t believe mainstream science as so many of their theories are wrong and they don`t even acknowledge it.
  32. Profile photo of sunday_scour
    sunday_scour Male 18-29
    283 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 3:13 pm
    @Klamz They DO acknowlege it. Perhaps you simply ignore it, or maybe you just haven`t spent 5-10 mins. learning science history. (Was I trolled again?!? Damn it!)
  33. Profile photo of Raokin
    Raokin Female 18-29
    452 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 4:32 pm
    Funny that this wasn`t published in any scientific journal or reported on any reputable news publications or websites.
  34. Profile photo of evanbartlett
    evanbartlett Male 30-39
    559 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 5:40 pm
    A 400+ bp sequence that has heretofore not been cataloged in the human genome simply means that it was a recent mutation (likely the reason for this human`s syndrome) or else a part of the vast majority of the genome which is classified as "junk DNA," DNA which is highly randomized and frequently mutates from one generation to the next and often isn`t even cataloged. The geneticist who conjectured that any of this has to do with mitochondrial gene therapy has a clear lack of understanding in basic genetic testing and analysis. The Southern blot electrophoresis test that they were viewing doesn`t even look at mitochondrial DNA. This is quackery folks. Trust me.
  35. Profile photo of robosnitz
    robosnitz Male 40-49
    2737 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 6:05 pm
    I thought Paul Stanley was the Starchild?
  36. Profile photo of paperduck
    paperduck Male 18-29
    1745 posts
    August 26, 2011 at 11:25 pm
    A lot simpler explanation: The `starchild` was a human that had a severe deformity that has since then become extinct and never made it into the NIH database.
  37. Profile photo of Vimto
    Vimto Male 40-49
    2853 posts
    August 27, 2011 at 3:45 am
    "I thought Paul Stanley was the Starchild?"

    I thought it was Jeff Bridges
  38. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 27, 2011 at 4:52 am
  39. Profile photo of diggierolls
    diggierolls Male 18-29
    151 posts
    August 27, 2011 at 12:41 pm
    wikipedia V, really? hahah youre an idiot
  40. Profile photo of AngryAsian
    AngryAsian Male 13-17
    122 posts
    August 27, 2011 at 2:24 pm
    couldnt it just be a massive mutation?
  41. Profile photo of phoneybone
    phoneybone Male 18-29
    1744 posts
    August 28, 2011 at 4:11 am
    iab, why you give the alien conspiracy theorists the time here? this stuff`s just dumb
  42. Profile photo of Tobunshi
    Tobunshi Male 18-29
    678 posts
    August 28, 2011 at 7:02 am
    diggierolls, and everyone else who believes this. Why don`t you check out, where this video was hosted? "UFO Videos, Conspiracy Forum, Top Secret". I`m sure this is legit!

    Seriously, you guys, I`m disappointed in you.
  43. Profile photo of lordastral
    lordastral Male 30-39
    45 posts
    August 28, 2011 at 8:53 pm
    its so obvious. its not an alien, its a human/chupacabra hybrid!
  44. Profile photo of MrAtari
    MrAtari Male 40-49
    1566 posts
    August 30, 2011 at 11:56 pm
    I`d ask Bones... She would know an explanation
  45. Profile photo of yeyum
    yeyum Male 50-59
    2 posts
    September 2, 2011 at 7:20 pm
    IAB I am really disappointed on this one.

Leave a Reply