Starchild Skull Not Human

Submitted by: SamWise050 6 years ago in Science

Disclose.tv - Dna update results on the starchild 2011 Video

DNA testing has been done and may possibly be recorded as the first alien DNA sample.
There are 45 comments:
Male 2
IAB I am really disappointed on this one.
0
Reply
Male 1,569
I`d ask Bones... She would know an explanation
0
Reply
Male 45
its so obvious. its not an alien, its a human/chupacabra hybrid!
0
Reply
Male 678
diggierolls, and everyone else who believes this. Why don`t you check out disclose.tv, where this video was hosted? "UFO Videos, Conspiracy Forum, Top Secret". I`m sure this is legit!

Seriously, you guys, I`m disappointed in you.
0
Reply
Male 1,744
iab, why you give the alien conspiracy theorists the time here? this stuff`s just dumb
0
Reply
Male 122
couldnt it just be a massive mutation?
0
Reply
Male 151
wikipedia V, really? hahah youre an idiot
0
Reply
Male 934
0
Reply
Male 2,862
"I thought Paul Stanley was the Starchild?"

I thought it was Jeff Bridges
0
Reply
Male 1,745
A lot simpler explanation: The `starchild` was a human that had a severe deformity that has since then become extinct and never made it into the NIH database.
0
Reply
Male 2,737
I thought Paul Stanley was the Starchild?
0
Reply
Male 559
A 400+ bp sequence that has heretofore not been cataloged in the human genome simply means that it was a recent mutation (likely the reason for this human`s syndrome) or else a part of the vast majority of the genome which is classified as "junk DNA," DNA which is highly randomized and frequently mutates from one generation to the next and often isn`t even cataloged. The geneticist who conjectured that any of this has to do with mitochondrial gene therapy has a clear lack of understanding in basic genetic testing and analysis. The Southern blot electrophoresis test that they were viewing doesn`t even look at mitochondrial DNA. This is quackery folks. Trust me.
0
Reply
Female 452
Funny that this wasn`t published in any scientific journal or reported on any reputable news publications or websites.
0
Reply
Male 283
@Klamz They DO acknowlege it. Perhaps you simply ignore it, or maybe you just haven`t spent 5-10 mins. learning science history. (Was I trolled again?!? Damn it!)
0
Reply
Male 688
While I tend not to believe anybody without very clear facts and numerous supporters behind them I will also say I don`t believe mainstream science as so many of their theories are wrong and they don`t even acknowledge it.
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Ok... well what does this change?
0
Reply
Male 283
The abscence of explanation does not imply the truth of otherworldly origin. Look up Micheal Shermer, he`s very nerdy, but knows his stuff.
0
Reply
Male 356
"Alien" is one plausible explanation, but in no way it is the only explanation. I`m still skeptical.
0
Reply
Male 840
[quote]:( i cant watch the video. [/quote]

You just saved a few minutes. Most of the rest of us just stopped watching after a few minutes by choice.
0
Reply
Female 1,356
k something like a jellyfish.
0
Reply
Female 1,356
@LandoGriffin
the video says the starchilds mitochondrial DNA is human and the DNA in the nucleus is not human. Also it`s improbable that it`s just some mutation. Mutations happen on a very small scale, often unnoticeable, and often happen when cell replication is fastest (as a fetus) which means if any dangerous mutation happened (haha, one that completely wiped out any recognizable sequence of human DNA) the kid would`ve died as a fetus.

Anyway, I`m sceptical. According to the video, there are too many dissimilarities to categorize it as human. (But they could be lying). And according to Ratdog993, the starchild is a Native American child that suffered from hydrocephalus, giving it a weird skull shape. His mitochondrial DNA came from a different haplogroup from the woman assumed to be his mother, but it was a haplogroup found among Natives. And his Y-chromosome says his father must be human.

I don`t think starchild`s an alien, probably because aliens should loo
0
Reply
Male 90
:( i cant watch the video.
0
Reply
Female 8,058
So no chance it is a deformed and mutated ape or human then?
0
Reply
Male 3,842
I don`t feel like sitting through the whole ten minute video, so forgive me if this was addressed in the vid, but how does one jump from non-human DNA to "alien" - what about all the other Earth animals, viruses that can alter cells, and/or mutated or otherwise altered DNA?
0
Reply
Male 198
Well I am smarter than most of these experts and I don`t agree
0
Reply
Male 234
"ALIENS. DONT. HAVE. DNA. It`s no(T) how evolution works, for drats sake."

Oh poo i forgot you`re professor of alien facts!! For a second I thought you were just a moron what with the claim that DNA is `not how evolution works`...

Get to the back of the line and STFU.
0
Reply
Male 1,054
900 years is time for lots of contamination.
0
Reply
Male 1,931
Science does not work as follows:

Get odd object. Test it to see if it fits norm. Object does not fit norm. IT`S FU CKING ALIENS, MAN!

0
Reply
Male 3,301
ALIENS. DONT. HAVE. DNA. It`s now how evolution works, for drats sake.
0
Reply
Male 150
I get why people are skeptical, it is a very radical theory, but come on! stop taking all the fun out of it!
0
Reply
Male 1,216
Even if it isn`t human, it could be a deformed ape too. There`s just no way this skull is functional.
0
Reply
Male 1,216
I`m skeptic about those tests. There is a reason why it`s a child, because he died of an early, because of an obvious deformity.

How can an alien breath through such a tight nose? And the eyes surely won`t be funsctional with those sockets... For an eye to move around normally it need to be spherical.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
"As for the DNA, previous DNA tests have shown it to be human"

Previous, out of date, can no longer be used (like your genetics degree). New test says it is not human. Thus we must assume the more accurate modern test results are the correct results.
0
Reply
Male 2,586
for a more genetics-based explanation: Link

ok, so there are lots of mtDNA variations but still, you`re using DNA!!! - would that really be consistent with extra-terrestrial life? - unless life on earth was seeded from extra-terrestrial DNA... or vice versa... hmmm...
0
Reply
Male 3,482
It`s a deformity, for f*ck`s sake. I mean really?

You can actually see things like this happening today. Fluid builds up in the brain cavity, and since the skull isn`t "set" at that age, it expands and starts to deform.

Bad "scientists" will do anything to come to the conclusion they want.

As for the DNA, previous DNA tests have shown it to be human, and I could take any NUMBER of tiny quotes out of context in scientific documents to make them mean what I want them too.
0
Reply
Male 125
I watched a special on this skull on the history channel a few days ago. This whole video is bunk, it was an oddity caused by megalencephaly.

Not saying the history channel is always correct, but they showed the tests that this video talks about, and unless they staged the tests... then it was just a really early example of a disease that persists today.

And they did a facial reconstruction, sepia, so if you want to see it I`m sure it can be found in google images search.
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Not sure how much of a reliable of a source this "Discl0sur3" thing can be
0
Reply
Female 353
i want to see a facial reconstruction of that skull
0
Reply
Male 1,735
I find it funny how all Aliens have human like skulls. Heck, there`s no reason to believe they`d even have bones like we do, they could be almost anything. Not saying there is or isn`t aliens, but why would they visit here a couple times and bugger off? If I traveled all that distance I think I would setup an outpost, or mine for resources that my planet doesn`t have. Some people will do anything to disprove God, why not just live your life and ignore the religious types?
0
Reply
Male 3,894
Swing and a miss...
0
Reply
Male 39,955

Of course it`s human.
But the mind is from the aliens who put the monolith on the moon.


0
Reply
Female 158
0
Reply
Male 662
THis is bullcrap...it was found to be human by DNA, this video is crap.

DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD (Bureau of Legal Dentistry), a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes"
0
Reply
Male 193
What about the other members of Kiss? Are they human?
0
Reply
Male 12
Link: Starchild Skull Not Human [Rate Link] - DNA testing has been done and may possibly be recorded as the first alien DNA sample.
0
Reply