Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 68    Average: 4.3/5]
75 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 17080
Rating: 4.3
Category:
Date: 08/16/11 04:10 PM

75 Responses to Jon Stewart On the Media Blackout of Ron Paul

  1. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:09 pm
    Link: Jon Stewart On the Media Blackout of Ron Paul - Even when the media does remember Ron Paul, it`s only to reassure themselves that there`s no need to remember Ron Paul.
  2. Profile photo of funnehkitteh
    funnehkitteh Male 18-29
    528 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:27 pm
    not availiable in my location. location. location
  3. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:36 pm
    Crappy copy but a copy none-the-less. for all you foreigners out there.
  4. Profile photo of Supricky06
    Supricky06 Male 18-29
    50 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:37 pm
    what is the deal with that??
  5. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:40 pm
    Hey I suggested this video as well.

    Oh well at least it got posted.

    Hehe I heard jeers mixed in with cheers after Paul`s statement.
  6. Profile photo of Oldfrt
    Oldfrt Male 50-59
    747 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:41 pm
    I`m not a Ron Paul fan, nor am I a Jon Stewart fan, but I gotta admit, Mr. Stewart has a point.
  7. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:41 pm
    Proof positive even FOX news is biased against war opponents.
  8. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:44 pm
    I`ve always respected Jon Stewart, and now I respect him even more. Sincerely, thank you for this Mr. Stewart.
  9. Profile photo of jkorr
    jkorr Male 30-39
    11 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:52 pm
    HA! Jokes on you!!! Ames`s Quiznos closed a while back!
  10. Profile photo of DrAtlas
    DrAtlas Male 18-29
    17 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 4:56 pm
    18 years old and I am already planning on voting for Ron Paul now no matter what.
  11. Profile photo of StrangeLil1
    StrangeLil1 Female 18-29
    85 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:02 pm
    I`ve always been a big Ron Paul supporter. But unfortunately since the media won`t promote him, no one will vote for him cause we live in a lazy society where whatever the media says goes.
  12. Profile photo of Stonecoast
    Stonecoast Male 30-39
    42 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:36 pm
    Problem is, it`s not just Fox, it`s most news services.
  13. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:37 pm
    I`d consider voting for Ron.
  14. Profile photo of alibi19
    alibi19 Male 18-29
    73 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:44 pm
    Finally! Some Ron Paul love. If Bachman didn`t pay for her supporters to come out and vote for her, Ron would have won that poll easily....but I`m not mad or anything. Ron Paul 2012!
  15. Profile photo of Ruffiana
    Ruffiana Male 30-39
    506 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:48 pm
    I respect Ron for having ideals that are clearly not coming from corporations or special interests and for consistently stating and sticking to those ideals.
    However, some of those ideals are just a bit too bat-poo crazy for me. Plus, if elected President, he`d get even less done than Obama has during his term. No one would work with him.
  16. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:56 pm
    really? with the Ron Paul BS still? All you that plan on voting for him need to get real. He can not be bought be the Media, so the media will not support him. He will not waste a drat-ton of cash on his campaign that could be used better elsewhere in a broken economy. He will not get the coverage needed to sway voters toward him, especially in that party.
  17. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36187 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    I almost wish Newt Gingrich could win the White House just to hear John Stewart and the Colbert Report make fun of him.
  18. Profile photo of cloud7zero
    cloud7zero Male 18-29
    102 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:20 pm
    ron paul 2012!
  19. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3435 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:27 pm
    I like him expressly because the Media Dislikes him.
  20. Profile photo of Sachi001
    Sachi001 Male 30-39
    599 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:27 pm
    Maybe if he would wear some magical underpants he would get more attention. I want a Ron Paul/Dylan Ratigan ticket.
  21. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2346 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:28 pm
    There are some people here that watch Fox news and believe what they see...these are the same people that started out taking the little yellow bus and graduated up to the short white bus that takes them to their day program so their family doesn`t have to deal with a 35 year old retard around the house all day.

    yes, that is right, I said if you watch fox news you are a retard...you may or may not be 35.
  22. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:30 pm
    @TypicalJerk

    People like you are why nothing ever changes. If you agree with someone, you should vote for them. As long as we only vote for whoever the media or big money serves up to us, then we are slaves to their interests.
  23. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:39 pm
    Ron Paul is bad for business (for the media). Unfortunately, that is the underlying hand that steers America in it`s direction. I can only express this so much: DON`T WASTE A VOTE ON RON PAUL. All you will be doing is feeding the larger machine at scheme, doing the same as not voting. What you need to do is call your local media on this wrong doing, and express your concern for the lack of a fair portrayal of this undemocratic event. Ron Paul can not be bought, therefore he will not be placed in the front running for the position you want him in. Take your votes, and publicly boycott this atrocity.
  24. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:41 pm
    and people like you are what`s hindering progress in the electoral system cluster-drat that we are in today. You think actually voting for a non-issue is going to speak your mind? NO! You are only pushing the vote more in favor to a more media embraced candidate!
  25. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18499 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:49 pm
    @Cajun247, you and Pooptart19 submitted this link literally two minutes apart. Consider this a co-post. It`s a great clip too.
  26. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 6:59 pm
    @ Typical Jerk

    That`s your strategy for change? Call up the news media and complain, or did you just mean preach to the choir by calling them out in the public eye, ie on the internet? And then in the meantime vote for their candidates?

    Whether Perry or Obama are elected, do you really think it will change anything? Bush, a republican, increased government spending like crazy despite repubs preaching fiscal responsibility for decades. Obama, a democrat, hasn`t pulled the troops out, and in fact has increased troop levels at times, despite promising to end the war with the entire dem party screaming for it back in `08.

    Votes matter. The further his campaign moves this election year, the further his ideals are spread, and the more validity they gain. And if by some miracle Paul were to be elected, the country would be much better off for it.
  27. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:02 pm
    But nothing will change as long as we keep writing off good men as `too far gone from the system` to be elected when the system is this broken.
  28. Profile photo of BlackHaze
    BlackHaze Male 18-29
    194 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:03 pm
    Real shocker people choose to ignore the man with the big mouth and the completely unrealistic world view and matching "solutions".

    Oh well, can`t be worse then the Black Messiah.
  29. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:05 pm
    I said do not vote, Boycott the system, and support this stain on our `democratic` process of election. I did not say vote for something you do not wish. And what you said expresses what I`ve already stated. You`d need a MIRACLE for any progress in Ron Paul`s campaign. The ideals that you speak of are already there, otherwise people wouldn`t vote for the man. If anything, don`t sit on your thumbs and silently vote for a non-factor, get off your ass and go spread the word.
  30. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:08 pm
    Not voting is an even worse strategy. There will always be the old party liners that vote in your stead. The only way to beat them is to eventually outvote them, and that won`t happen overnight.

    The only way our election system is going to change is through armed insurrection, or a complete collapse of the government, which is less likely than Paul getting elected...
  31. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:10 pm
    Less likely? You`d be surprised.
    Again, I didn`t say `simply not vote.` I said publicly oppose these events. Don`t make me come back here 6 months from now when Ron Paul finishes less than third in the republican race and say; `I told you so.`
  32. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:19 pm
    Hmm, aimless dissent vs supporting a growing group of idealists promoting what is right and good in the eyes of many. We support this movement, even if it will likely result in yet another failure this upcoming year. The movement is growing, meanwhile public opposition and protests are accomplishing what they always have: nothing.
  33. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:30 pm
    - - But nothing will change as long as we keep writing off good men as `too far gone from the system` to be elected when the system is this broken. - -

    These are your own words. They will come to light when your candidate continually gets snubbed. Not only by the media, but his own party.

    I guess you could always go the independent route, but again, it always falls short of what your `growing movement` was all about.

    you act like there wasn`t a VOTE FOR RON PAUL push last election.
  34. Profile photo of Rawrg
    Rawrg Male 18-29
    934 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:35 pm
    I know that push is bigger this year. That`s progress in my eyes.
  35. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 7:42 pm
    @fancy

    First time you ever addressed me, but like I said glad it got posted anyway :-).
  36. Profile photo of MountainBord
    MountainBord Female 18-29
    1894 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 8:47 pm
    hahah..... TRUTH and nothing but it.
  37. Profile photo of xiquiripat
    xiquiripat Male 18-29
    2423 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 9:14 pm
    Go vote for your Fox News approved candidate or Bill O`Reilly will do it live.
  38. Profile photo of yellowsquare
    yellowsquare Female 18-29
    1545 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 9:17 pm
    Lol @ "Bring us a Palin soundbyte!" implying that Palin soundbytes aren`t crazy, and are somehow of superior quality. Hahahahahahaha!
  39. Profile photo of markust123
    markust123 Male 40-49
    3876 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 10:19 pm
    It is frightening how much control the media has over the public debate and our country. They are the fourth branch of the government.
  40. Profile photo of Errand_boy
    Errand_boy Male 30-39
    621 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 10:40 pm
    Funny how criminals you can`t arrest put themselves right in front of your face.

    @ markust123: 4th branch is damn right. Too bad we can`t vote for news outlets, not that THAT would do any good.
  41. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36187 posts
    August 16, 2011 at 10:57 pm

    Errandboy - "Too bad we can`t vote for news outlets"
    We do. It`s called `ratings`. If people quit watching they`d change the format to something we do want to see. So I guess there is a strong, fearful group of angry white people that keeps Fox News in business....not me of course
  42. Profile photo of xelous
    xelous Male 18-29
    2513 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 2:11 am
    Ron Paul 2012
  43. Profile photo of tsiemens
    tsiemens Male 30-39
    515 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 2:48 am
    Paul is censored because if he got in the people who REALLY run the country would lose a lot of power
  44. Profile photo of ghettoelf
    ghettoelf Male 18-29
    55 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 3:08 am
    RON PAUL 2012! Right back at you, tsie. You nailed it ont he head.
  45. Profile photo of Klamz
    Klamz Male 18-29
    689 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 4:27 am
    - Ron Paul thinks that shutting down the Department of Education will improve the quality of
    education. He wouldn`t dismantle public schools but would encourage homeschooling and private
    schools with tax write-offs. (Sure while the people who can afford it will be just as smart as before maybe more so, it will end up being like college and only 30% of people will be going, stupidest idea I`ve ever heard and definitely keep people in poverty.)

    - Ron Paul believes that trade with China should not be tied to human rights. (Sure lets do business with people who suppress and murder their opposition and consider tax evasion a capital punishment.)

    - He thinks that the minimum wage limits opportunities. (Yea for businesses, say hello to ONE dollar an hour!)

    Yea I`d say just forget about this guy.
    Romney is the only one who has any chance and those chances are basically nothing, 2012 is a wasted election.
  46. Profile photo of RobSwindol
    RobSwindol Male 30-39
    2508 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 4:32 am
    Personally I think Rob paul has some great ideas, but his bat poo crazy ideas (like privatising parks) just goes too far for me to seriously consider voting for him.

    I wish we had a candidate who had his enthusiasm but not-so-crazy ideas.

    I love the fact that he`s pretty much the only Republican candidate who feels that the war in Iraq was basically manufactured. Then again, that doesn`t necessarily make him smart. It just makes the rest dumb.

    As a republican candidate, he`s competing in a battle of whits on the short bus. The only problem is that republican votors are going to vote for the dumbest candidate... not Rob Paul.
  47. Profile photo of CoolerThanMe
    CoolerThanMe Male 18-29
    98 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 4:40 am
    @Klamz
    -You said that eliminating the D.O.E. wouldn`t change anything.

    -You said trade with China wouldn`t change.

    -You think minimum wage doesn`t limit opportunitys, but if there are mandatory raises in the minimum wage that will drive consumer cost up, or jobs down.

    So by your estimation, besides minimum wage, if you like Obama, i.e. more of the same, vote Paul.
  48. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25407 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 4:44 am
    awesome
  49. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 6:11 am
    The problem with Ron Paul is his libertarian views end at Same sex marriage and his Christianity takes over. He`s well aware that gay marriage is coming to all of America but he`s now propositioning that states should be allowed to define marriage as it wants. That`s not libertarian. It`s standard republican gay hate.
    I also don`t believe that recent events have proven that Wall Street needs fewer regulations but hey what do I know? Ron Paul otherwise is the only republican candidate that I could see myself voting for. I`m all for seeing the end to wars and our military empire vanishing from the likes of Korea or Germany or Okinawa. That is a big seller in and of itself.
  50. Profile photo of Klamz
    Klamz Male 18-29
    689 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 6:53 am
    @CoolerThanMe

    You`re missing the point I`m trying to make. I`m not saying I support the exact opposite of his ideas, nor am I saying I don`t support many of his other ideas but I`m never going to vote for someone with even 1 completely ridiculous radical idea like dismantling AND NOT REBUILDING the public school system.

    I`d saying the biggest flaw in him is he`s a republican. republicans want a limited federal govt and that`s just not feasible for long term stability. We are one nation not a bunch of nation states uniting for a common good.

    If we don`t have unity as one solid country then it will fall apart over the smallest disagreement.

    Imagine if Canada and the US combined their government/military, everything, we would be 1 country that acted as 1 country, but without that 1 uniting factor we would each do our own thing.

    You`d eventually end up with a bunch of state run armies fighting for different things accomplishing nothing. A limite
  51. Profile photo of BoredIAm
    BoredIAm Male 18-29
    146 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 6:55 am
    @jkorr "HA! Jokes on you!!! Ames`s Quiznos closed a while back!"

    You must not be referring to the Quiznos at 302 Lincoln Way Ames, IA 50010

    Dipsh*t
  52. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 7:20 am
    Ron Paul would throw Israel to the muslim wolves. He`s a closet anti-semite and I have no tolerance for anyone that`s against Israel, Including our current president that`s bowed to the Saudi king.
  53. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 7:40 am
    Israel should take care of Israel. That part of the world is none of our concern.
  54. Profile photo of DiegoDeFuego
    DiegoDeFuego Male 18-29
    241 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 7:55 am
    @Klamz

    The federal government is necesarry, but that doesn`t mean it should be in charge of everything.

    What makes you think if the federal government wasn`t in charge of everything that the states would just float away from eachother.

    People want strong federal government for the same reason republicans want to keep our military empire. They`re scared. They are afraid of not having control, and it`s this control that is stunting the growth of our country and stunting the growth of every country we have power in.
  55. Profile photo of DiegoDeFuego
    DiegoDeFuego Male 18-29
    241 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 7:58 am
    @madest

    The government is never going to control wallstreet for the good, because the people with money are always going to be able to take advantage of the system. If the government runs the economy, and the government is run by politicians, and the politicians can be bought by corporations, then corporations run the economy.
  56. Profile photo of DiegoDeFuego
    DiegoDeFuego Male 18-29
    241 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 8:12 am
    Can I also add as a side note that Crakrjack and 5Cats are not the spokespeople for conservative christians.
  57. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 8:44 am
    The government is never going to control wallstreet for the good, because the people with money are always going to be able to take advantage of the system.
    -----------------
    Wall Street is up in arms about the Dodd Frank bill that puts limits on Wall St. gambling with our money. They also went nuts over the proposed Consumer protection agency that Elizabeth Warren was to head.
    Wall Street is scared. They know the F`d up. Taking away agencies that oversee them doesn`t sound like smart politics to me. It sounds like quite the opposite.
  58. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 8:46 am
    The government is never going to control wallstreet for the good, because the people with money are always going to be able to take advantage of the system. If the government runs the economy, and the government is run by politicians, and the politicians can be bought by corporations, then corporations run the economy.

    corporations run the economy (bland statement. But they also control the media (as seen here), and they have a strong guiding hand in who America votes for, not to mention their ability to buy off politicians.

    Voting for Ron Paul does not fix this.
  59. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 8:53 am
    He`s a closet anti-semite
    Really, Crakr? Really? I guess because you don`t like Obama and hate welfare programs, you must hate black people and be a closet white supremacist. See what I did there? Just when I thought we could find some common ground, Crakr, you say something like that. Once again, I want nothing to do with you.
  60. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36187 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 9:03 am

    Ron Pauls presidential ability is irrelevant.
    Being and independant, neither Demotards nor Republitards would work with him. Nothing would get done. He`d be the lamest of lame duck presidents.
  61. Profile photo of DiegoDeFuego
    DiegoDeFuego Male 18-29
    241 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 9:43 am
    @TypicalJerk

    Going back to the gold standard and eventually phasing out the federal reserve would do a lot to help. Right now right now corporations and banks can spend money ,on credit, that doesn`t actually exist and they sure as hell don`t have and if it all drats up the federal reserve will bail them out. Going back to a gold standard, free market with limited government involvement would turn what most banks and corporations do on a regular basis into fraud that is liable to prosecution.

    Right now the only companies that can thrive are the ones that are already rich enough to take advantage of all the bullpoo.
  62. Profile photo of letsComplain
    letsComplain Female 18-29
    10 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 10:23 am
    "Sorry this video is unavailable from your location" Loool
  63. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 10:46 am
    @Crakr

    Wow man confronted with a guy who`s actually fiscally conservative you go right ahead and throw civility right out the window. As for your notion about Israel, that`s bull5h17.
  64. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 11:00 am
    Say Crakr in case you don`t want to read that article I`ll bring up a quote for you.

    Obama proposes Israel should re-draw their borders to the ones that existed before 1967.

    Ron Paul`s response: "Unlike this President, I do not believe it is our place to dictate how Israel runs her affairs,"
  65. Profile photo of Adi_Noor
    Adi_Noor Male 18-29
    191 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 11:06 am
    @CrakrJak
    I really feel bad you sound a little anti-muslim. What do you mean by the muslim wolves? The saudi king? Guess who informed america of those printer cartridges packed bombs headed to america?
  66. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 12:08 pm
    Adi: Don`t bother. Every time crakr claims he`s not anti-Muslim I ask him to provide one post out of his ~700 odd posts about Muslims where he says something just positive, he conveniently misses my posts.

    When I challenge him to formal debates, he misses that too. Again and again.

    For example, lets see how he reacts to say, the fact that Muslim Americans are the least likely to justify killing civilians in the US, out of all religious groups.

    Perfect opportunity for a positive comment. I don`t see it coming any time soon.
  67. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 12:18 pm
    @Madest:
    No, I`m afraid we disagree. Ron thinks everything is a state`s rights issue.

    " I think the government should just be out of it. I think it should be done by the church as a private contract and we shouldn`t have this argument of who`s married and who isn`t married. I have my standards but I shouldn`t impose my standards on others. Others have their standards and they have no right to impose their marriage standards on me. But if we want to have something to say about marriage, it should be at the state level and not at the federal level. Just get the government out of it. It`s one area where it`s totally unnecessary, and they`ve caused more trouble than necessary."
  68. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 12:33 pm
    Ron thinks everything is a state`s rights issue.

    EVERYTHING Baal?

    On that note I`ve been for certifying same-sex marriages, but I`m not against all the governments getting out of the certifying marriages altogether. Either way it has no business saying who can marry who.
  69. Profile photo of BigWaFuu
    BigWaFuu Male 18-29
    1163 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 1:28 pm
    Jon continues to hit the nail on the head.
  70. Profile photo of crackyhoss
    crackyhoss Male 18-29
    254 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 5:00 pm
    first off, i registered republican just so i can vote for ron paul..

    second: Baalthazaq... your link to arabian business site might be construed as a biased source... kind of like using PETA`s website to prove that Ringling Brothers engages in animal cruelty; your point is undoubtedly valid, and might even be true, but your source is clearly biased, and therefore negates your argument.
  71. Profile photo of erikthevikin
    erikthevikin Male 30-39
    757 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 11:39 pm
    What is the problem of seeing this in Canada I live 20 mins from the border why cant we see.
  72. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    August 18, 2011 at 5:32 am
    Baal, Yeah, Yeah. He`s all about "liberty" until it comes down to a womans right to choose or same sex marriage. Then you see the Christianity raise it`s ugly head. Go to Ron Pauls website and you`ll see that he will work to undo Roe v Wade. He believes that unborn life should have more rights than gay people. His position of states rights is nonsense.
  73. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    August 18, 2011 at 6:45 am
    @madest

    You`re wrong about the same sex marriage part, he believes it should be a state matter. But wouldn`t you be more worried about a candidate/president who`d wants to continue the war on drugs? Ron Paul has opposed the war on drugs since.
  74. Profile photo of jtrebowski
    jtrebowski Male 40-49
    3348 posts
    August 18, 2011 at 7:07 am
    CrakrJak said: "Ron Paul would throw Israel to the muslim wolves. He`s a closet anti-semite and I have no tolerance for anyone that`s against Israel."

    Um, no. That is yet another lie that you and other Cons like to spew. I`m no Ron Paul fan, but even I know enough about him to understand he just wants to stop throwing money at Isreal. How is that anti-semitic? Do we really need to give them money just to be our friends?
  75. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    August 18, 2011 at 6:10 pm
    @Cajun, You`re right. In fact ending all the wars would be worth the trade-off on two important issues that really wouldn`t affect me anyway. He just loses me with the religion thing.

Leave a Reply