ISS Camera Catches UFO Uncloaking

Submitted by: madest 5 years ago Science

So Star Trek had that cloaking feature right as well. They were indeed ahead of their time.
There are 104 comments:
Female 412
Satellite?
0
Reply
Male 1,299
UFO = Unidentified Flying Object

I don`t think it`s disputable that, if the video is accurate, this was a UFO.

Whether or not it has anything to do with intelligent life, or "aliens" is another matter entirely, and wether or not intelligent life (or life at all) exists elsewhere in the universe, is another issue, still.

I think much of the dissatisfaction from the debate is people confusing and combining the three issues.
0
Reply
Male 1,265
uncloaking one pixel at a time
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]Wasted too much time on your dumb ass as it is.[/quote]
Right, because you have such a busy schedule. After all, only those with hectic days become mods with over 4,000 forum posts on a site called "I-am-bored."

Still waiting on the details of that lawsuit BTW. I googled it and got nothing about him suing over UFO claims...

As for Stern, there was slightly more than the 45 minutes you can find online. Unfortunately, the rest hasn`t been put up online, and I can`t find it (without putting down any money, at least).
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Whatever dude. You`re a bore. Wasted too much time on your dumb ass as it is. You have your belief system, I`ll stick with mine.
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]He sued a guy and won for repeating what he said. Changing his tune after the suit could be financially hurtful.[/quote]
Who? Where did you hear this?

[quote]Nonetheless whatever editing there was was pretty swift because I see him talking and the sentences flow like his speech.[/quote]
Cropping a video is a form of video editing, BTW.

[quote]If everything you see on the internet is fake why are you here?[/quote]
I wonder if you even realize that half your arguments consist of putting words in your opponent`s mouth...?
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Yeah clearly he`s put himself in an untenable position. He sued a guy and won for repeating what he said. Changing his tune after the suit could be financially hurtful. Nonetheless whatever editing there was was pretty swift because I see him talking and the sentences flow like his speech. If everything you see on the internet is fake why are you here?
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]OK you don`t believe life is possible anywhere else in the universe and they couldn`t be smarter than us so go ahead and revel in your self righteous world.[/quote]
I never said I didn`t believe in life outside Earth. I said it`s highly unlikely that they`re visiting earth constantly.

Also, that first part of the videos is the EXACT interview that Buzz later said was cropped and edited multiple times.

The second, he doesn`t make any claims or denials. He simply says that someone started publishing a lot of BS and that it ruined his credibility to some extent.

The third says, once again, he has no idea what it is, so we should go find out what it is to shut the idiots up about it.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Altaru, You`re a sonofabitch. You made me go back and listen to that whole 45minute segment of Aldrin on Howard and he never mentioned anything about it. It did remind me how often he says "uhhh" so yeah thanks for that. OK you don`t believe life is possible anywhere else in the universe and they couldn`t be smarter than us so go ahead and revel in your self righteous world. I`ll keep my mind open.
Here`s Aldrin on UFO`s
0
Reply
Male 3,482
Obviously you never actually look into many of these "astronaut sightings," because more than a few have been either debunked or outright DENIED by the astronauts themselves.

And most have been either short comments taken out of context or outright fabricated.

It amazes me how some bullsh*t story can gain so much (false) authenticity by being passed around.

It`s like grade-school rumors. Billy doesn`t really pick his nose, he was just scratching it. That won`t stop the other kids from treating him differently because of it...
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]Altaru, Come up here to DC. Visit the Library of Congress and ask for "Mission Control Tapes" of Apollo 11.[/quote]
I`m assuming you`ve actually done this and came across this exact recording?

I`m also assuming that you think the high-ups are morons and would leave something like that available to the general public during their "anti-UFO" campaign.

Every time you bring something like that up as evidence, that apparently the government big shots "missed," it show two things:

A) You`re gullible as hell.

B) You underestimate the US government`s ability to cover up sensitive information.

And that still doesn`t explain why Buzz Aldrin has said, multiple times, that there WAS NO UFO. More times than he said there might have been, he has said that there was NOT.

Or why the head of the Center for UFO Studies has provided reasonable explanations for many astronaut "UFO sightings."
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Altaru, Come up here to DC. Visit the Library of Congress and ask for "Mission Control Tapes" of Apollo 11. Or you could simply Google it. There are at least 13 astronauts that have seen UFO`s which would make them exceedingly more prevalent than your earthbound mind could grasp.
0
Reply
Male 3,482
Madest, if aliens ever DO arrive on Earth and extend some measure of diplomacy, I sure as hell hope they don`t meet you first.

I`m amazed you`re intelligent enough to breathe sometimes. You`re also gullible as f*ck.
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]That tape is in the historical record.[/quote]
I`m calling bullsh*t.

Give the the carfax, so to speak. I wanna see official documentation behind that recording, rather than just some backstory a conspiracy theorist attached to it. I wanna know what mission it was taken on, at least. If it`s supposed to be the Apollo mission, I`d like to know why the "Huston" sounds nothing like the Huston in other recordings.

As for Aldrin, I thought you listened to Howard Stern? He denied claims of UFO`s on the show during an interview. Aldrin`s also said the interview that his UFO comment was made during was cut short to cut off his mention that it was probably a piece of the rocket floating around in orbit.

He`s said multiple times that his words have been taken out of context, and you`re just one of the idiots doing it.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
madest: The more you protest your claim of UFOs/Aliens the nuttier you seem.

As I said before, you are not the type of person that would give any weight to any evidence of God ever presented to you. So it would be throwing pearls before swine to show you anything at all.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
That tape is in the historical record. He`s not the only astronaut to have seen alien aircraft. Buzz Aldrin has several youtube interviews about his encounter. But yeah the astronauts are just crazy.
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]Neil Armstrong telling mission control what he`s seeing.[/quote]
Holy

Sh*t

Madest. If you HONESTLY believe this, you have completely lost touch with reality. I`d be willing to forgive some of your gullibility towards stupid sh*t like this "ISS" video, but this supposed recording is so poorly faked I don`t even know how to respond.

It`s like, I`m in so much shock and awe that someone had the GALL to post something this bad and claim it`s authenticity... I don`t know what to say...

And then the very idea that someone out there BELIEVES it... You HAVE to be trolling right now.
0
Reply
Male 3,482
Also, I`m just going to throw this out there, the shape of the supposed UFO in this video is HORRIBLY inefficient for space travel.
0
Reply
Male 3,482
[quote]This video was taken from the International Space Station.[/quote]
A lot of videos can be taken from the ISS showing a lot of empty space. Then one guy could use, I dunno, After Effects maybe? And alter the video to put a "UFO" in there.

[quote]Likewise this guy found another UFO video taken from the Space Shuttle. Alerted to the video NASA took the video clip down.[/quote]
Is that the facts, or is that just his story? And when this guy has so many other "real" UFO videos, why was that ONE taken down? Why hasn`t this one been taken down?

[quote]Look for the "Top Secret NASA Alien UFO" video link at the end of this video.[/quote]
I REFUSE to believe that NASA, in their apparently desperate quest to delete evidence of UFO`s across the web, doesn`t know how to use Google. And that`s all it would take to find some of these videos and have them taken down.

You`re f*cking retarded.
0
Reply
Male 7
Maybe someone should slap CJ? When have you SEEN god? When has ANYONE seen god? When have people seen aliens? Loads of times. i haven`t seen video footage of god, so if you have it, please show me.
0
Reply
Male 798
@Madest:

[quote]One real instance that God really exists and I`ll weigh it to see if it meets anything close to video proof from NASA.[/quote]

[quote]I`ll weigh it to see if it meets anything close to video proof from NASA.[/quote]

[quote]video proof from NASA.[/quote]


0
Reply
Male 7,378
Less evidence CJ? Give me proof of just one instance of God. Just one. Nothing stupid like "because we exist" because that`s just conjecture. One real instance that God really exists and I`ll weigh it to see if it meets anything close to video proof from NASA.
0
Reply
Male 1,744
this is beyond horrible and that someone is even trying to tout this as "real" is beyond belief
0
Reply
Male 17,512
madest: You remind me of Vincent Vega in Pulp Fiction, You wouldn`t recognize a miracle if one slapped you in the face. That`s your choice, but don`t ridicule my belief when your UFO/Alien belief has even less evidence.
0
Reply
Male 268
It looked like somebody shopped an A6 Intruder into a shot from the Iss space camera
0
Reply
Male 21
@Madest, there is no evidence of aliens . Prattle on about them all you want there is just a conspiracy book written by some crackheads. lolwut
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Why because I don`t believe in God? Stop being silly cyberdyne.
0
Reply
Male 4,902
Primitive man had sh*tty special effects.
0
Reply
Male 4,902
Dear God madest, you`ve jumped the shark my friend, you`ve lost it completely.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
@CJ, There is no evidence of God. Prattle on about him all you want there is just a book written by primitive man.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
Madest & SvampeBob: I doubt either of you would believe in God no matter what evidence was revealed to either of you. But you two are willing to throw science under the bus to believe in UFOs. Sorry but that kind of hypocrisy just doesn`t fly.
0
Reply
Male 138
Its a Sat, if real. Just a digi cam doing its best..
0
Reply
Male 1,540
I enhanced the image for you guys so you can see what a real life UFO looks like:


0
Reply
Male 599
Seriously Madest your not implying that audio recording of Neil Armstrong is legit?
0
Reply
Male 599
@RobSwindle
That`s stupid. Spacecraft have no use for wings. There is no air in space, which means no friction, so wings would be useless.

I would put it not that way, but rather the technology they would have for anti gravity travel would not require wings. After all we primitives here use wings on the shuttle for landing. ;-P
0
Reply
Male 2,855
man, i see a lot of idiots here
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Madest, thanks for confirming that what you stated is not true in reality, only conspiracy theory "true".

Anyone who thinks otherwise, please listen to the audio that Madest claims is Neil Armstrong and mission control.
0
Reply
Male 138
swamp gas
0
Reply
Male 297
Would be more believable, if you couldn`t see the obvious black dot, edited in with a fade transition over it. Just sayin`...
0
Reply
Male 798
@Madest: Really? Out of all of the UFO videos out there, and out of all the reports, you are going to defend this video? At least other videos use decent CGI, but I could replicate this in my basement for under $20.

Choose your battles more carefully.

[quote]Angillon: Some things are written in stone and even with those that aren`t, the lack of absolute certainty forever in every way does not mean that any particular person`s faith must be right, whether it`s CrakrJak`s faith in his god or your faith in your aliens.[/quote]

^^This.

0
Reply
Male 2,790
probably just a bad reflection
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]But for all you 100% naysayers out there you might not trust me, but would you trust Niel Armstrong? He openly talks about his encounters.[/quote]

Does anyone know if that`s actually true or just conspiracy theory "true"?

I had a look at a couple of websites about Neil Armstrong and UFOs. They were talking about the hidden messages in what Neil Armstrong has said (that only they are wise enough to understand, obviously) and that it`s strong evidence (or outright proof) that the moon landing (these people are too ignorant to know there were more than one) was faked on the orders of these aliens.

So I`m not convinced that madest`s statement is true in reality.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
7025 Posts posts to come to that conclusion? You`re not as smart as I give you credit for after all.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]That`s stupid. Spacecraft have no use for wings. There is no air in space, which means no friction, so wings would be useless.[/quote]

A small spacecraft might be designed to allow for atmospheric flight as well, to widen its usefulness. So it isn`t entirely stupid, although I`d argue that anyone with such staggeringly advanced technology that they can do interstellar flight probably wouldn`t need wings on aeroplanes anyway.

But I`m sure this video is stupid anyway, because madest is saying it`s real.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]If it is unidentified how do you know it is alien?[/quote]
----------------
Deductive reasoning probably combined with heaps of certifiable evidence. Perhaps not all of the UFO incidents I posted here have been real. In an effort get it to you fast I sometimes ignore the early warning signs. But for all you 100% naysayers out there you might not trust me, but would you trust Niel Armstrong? He openly talks about his encounters. Yeah anything can be photoshopped or digitally manipulated and lots of crap on the internet is fake. Isn`t it more fun to consider the possibilities? Forgive me but I am high.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Yeah this one just isn`t true. We know the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light so there`s something faster. Nothing is written in stone, even CJ`s omnipotent being.[/quote]

Yes, but nothing in it is moving faster than the speed of light relative to an inertial frame of reference (which is what the speed of light limit is actually stated to be).

Some things are written in stone and even with those that aren`t, the lack of absolute certainty forever in every way does not mean that any particular person`s faith must be right, whether it`s CrakrJak`s faith in his god or your faith in your aliens.
0
Reply
Male 2,514
That`s stupid. Spacecraft have no use for wings. There is no air in space, which means no friction, so wings would be useless.
0
Reply
Male 20
looks like a satellite with some crappy 90`s dissolve fade out applied.
0
Reply
Male 152
So I think I noticed that when that SPACE PLANE apparated because of magic (clearly), it only started moving when it completely solidified. Does that mean it cam from another dimension???
0
Reply
Male 2,033
"Alien UFO"

If it is unidentified how do you know it is alien?
0
Reply
Male 3,061
How in the hell did a B-17 get way up there?

0
Reply
Male 2,850
@madest

You`re trolling...right?
0
Reply
Male 533
--"Really ?

Show me a dead alien or show me some crashed UFO wreckage and I`ll point you to about ten times as many religious relics and archeological digs related to the bible."--

Yes, really. Relics =/= god, archaeological digs related to the bible=/=god. How many Greek and Roman structures have we found dedicated to their gods? Does that mean their god exists? Hardly.

basically, there is a poo-ton of whackos that have more photographic/video/recovered bits of ufo `proof` of their witnesses compared how many miracles and sightings of god there have been.

Some people want to believe a man in the heavens, some want to believe in a whole race/fleet/alternate universe out there. For one to call the other ignorant is, well, it`s just ignorant.
0
Reply
Male 25,416
wow.... lets all use this as evidence now and go crazy
0
Reply
Male 2,034
Looks like a plane.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]obvious fake is obvious. It even pixellates as if its been done through after effects.[/quote]
---------------
Cynicism can make a man old. This video was taken from the International Space Station. It might still be there if you knew where to look. Likewise this guy found another UFO video taken from the Space Shuttle. Alerted to the video NASA took the video clip down. Look for the "Top Secret NASA Alien UFO" video link at the end of this video. Also quite compelling.
0
Reply
Male 3,285
obvious fake is obvious. It even pixellates as if its been done through after effects.
0
Reply
Male 3,076
CrakrJak: there is a bigger chance for life in the univers other than earth, than some supernatural man in the "sky" with a paradise and an eternal fire judging us for our sins, saying there is only this planet with life, but unwilling to show proof of himself and expects us to belive in him blindly so we are able to live for ever with him.



I`m off to watch porn and masturbate
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]Show me a dead alien or show me some crashed UFO wreckage and I`ll point you to about ten times as many religious relics and archeological digs related to the bible.[/quote]
--------------
That analogy doesn`t make any sense CJ. There is no more scientific proof of your "omnipotent deity" than there is of Thetans living in volcanoes. You see that video of the tribe that sacrificed a village kid? Yeah they`re just as sure that`s what their God wants as you are that your God is real. You should work on that twisted logic.
0
Reply
Male 9
Its fake! If you pause it right when it comes out of its cloak, it looks like the resolution of the "uncloaking" action is different.
0
Reply
Male 65
Satellite emerging from Earth`s shadow.
0
Reply
Male 408
lol who watches something like this and thinks omg aliens are real!
0
Reply
Male 527
@CrakrJak

Religious finds do not prove the exitence of God. It merely shows that passages from the bible are based on existing items.

Or are you saying that, because i can show you the moon, the story of the man on the moon or the cow that jumped over it are true?
0
Reply
Male 2,552
Looks like a pixelated bi-plane to me.
0
Reply
Male 17,512
TypicalJerk: Really ?

Show me a dead alien or show me some crashed UFO wreckage and I`ll point you to about ten times as many religious relics and archeological digs related to the bible.
0
Reply
Male 533
When you impose our scientific knowledge on an Omnipotent God, then you too are shortchanging science and discovery.

Let me just say this. there is more `proof` that points to the existence of extraterrestrial life than any `proof` of a single man in the sky.
0
Reply
Female 50
If this is real then why is the de-cloaking drating pixelated?
0
Reply
Male 17,512
madest: It just kills me that your willing to use science to beat a deist over the head, but when it comes to UFOs/Aliens your willing to discard it like a used tissue.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]Nothing can go faster than the speed of light?[/quote]
--------------
Yeah this one just isn`t true. We know the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light so there`s something faster. Nothing is written in stone, even CJ`s omnipotent being.
0
Reply
Male 156
Nothing can go faster than the speed of light? Easy, just do like they did in Futurama... increase the speed of light! :D
0
Reply
Male 59
I love the way it kinda banks to the right and then back to the left as it "uncloaks"

THAT was the tape that I was waiting for - I am completely convinced Now
0
Reply
Male 9
OHHH cmon! this should be the worst post i´ve ever seen!
0
Reply
Male 911
@terracottus let`s not forget Quantum non-locality, quantum tunneling, quantum jumping. there are more ways to travel than through spacetime. and although i may have come off rude, it`s because IAB`ers vomit so much bullpoo it`s starting to get to me.

this part is not targeted at you terracottus but IAB`ers, IF YOU DONT KNOW SOMETHING, THEN DONT BOTHER WRITING A BULLpoo COMMENT.
0
Reply
Male 911
@terracottus einstein also theorized about wormholes, sad to say you might have missed that part in cherry picking the works of Einstein to support your argument. or you`re just generally ignorant on the subject, in that case. leave it alone?
0
Reply
Male 214
Wow - the red Baron`s plane made it into space....
0
Reply
Male 17,512
madest: When you impose our scientific knowledge on an Omnipotent God, then you too are shortchanging science and discovery.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]Why are you attacking me personaly? You would need all the amount of energy in the universe to travel at lightspeed.[/quote]
---------------
I didn`t personally attack you. When you impose our scientific knowledge on alien life you`re shortchanging science and discovery. We`ve only been around for a sliver of time in comparison to dinosaurs. State your case in 50 million years.
0
Reply
Male 3,057

0
Reply
Male 798
Wow a cheaply made model of the ISS is definitely going to convince me.
0
Reply
Male 379
really... really.
0
Reply
Male 280
I`m not trying to say that it is impossible, I say the chance that an alien race that developed under evolutionary conditions has ships that travel lightyears in a biological reasonable amount of time, is IMPROBABLE. Why would you get all hyped and make lots of improbable assumptions once you see blurred footage of space objects, rather than thinking about the more reasonable?
0
Reply
Male 280
@Revolutioniz: there is nothing "pseudo scientific" about my statement. I simply was wrong about the distance, but as I said, I wasn`t sure in the first place.
"for all you know there are alien races older than our own galaxy who can span the distance of the universe in a second. " I`m really not sure what to make of that statement. For all Einstein knew nothing can travel faster than light, in a second that would be one light second. which isn`t even the distance to the moon. Of course, as anything in science Einstein could be right, there for I said IMPROBABLE, not impossible.

@Madest: Why are you attacking me personaly? You would need all the amount of energy in the universe to travel at lightspeed. Stepping down bit, it would still need enormous amounts of energy to do so. Of course, alien "space engins" could be more sophisticated an efficient than ours, but they still have to behave to the basic laws of physic.
0
Reply
Male 4,807

Well.. That convinced me. What more proof do you need?
0
Reply
Male 1,582
/facepalm
0
Reply
Male 759

0
Reply
Male 911
@Terracottus i really really really hate pseudo-scientific statements. first off the closest "STARS" are (alpha Centauri A and Alpha centauri B), and they`re 4.37 light years away. Second aliens could be far more advanced than you could even imagine, i bet 200 years ago the idea of a computer or any of our newer technologies were way out of man`s grasp. thirdly, for all you know there are alien races older than our own galaxy who can span the distance of the universe in a second.
0
Reply
Male 904
Does that mean if I turn the lights off I`ve cloaked myself?
0
Reply
Male 1,832
@TABITHA13 If you really spell like that, you are in the same boat.
0
Reply
Male 145
yeah that looks more like a satilite than anything else too me, why would any advanced civilisation have square wings in space ._.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
[quote]It`s so funny that people still think blurry footage of random chunk of stuff on the internet MUST be proof for UFOs, even though it`s so damn improbable. Seriously, the closest star where potential E.Ts could come from (Alpha Centauri) is around 40 lightyears ways, if I remember right.[/quote]
-------------
Why do you impose our scientific knowledge on aliens? Is it because you`re self important? Remember dinosaurs roamed for 150million years. Imagine what we`ll know then.
0
Reply
Male 280
It`s so funny that people still think blurry footage of random chunk of stuff on the internet MUST be proof for UFOs, even though it`s so damn improbable. Seriously, the closest star where potential E.Ts could come from (Alpha Centauri) is around 40 lightyears ways, if I remember right.
Given that it takes enormous energy for massive objects to even come close to that, and the hence they have to travel way slowerm I doubt that any living creature will come around anytime soon.
An unmaned spaceprobe could be possible though.
But hey, once you have sound evidence (apart from blurry pics) I`m totally up for that.
0
Reply
Male 15,510
ROFL, wow planes are flying very high now
0
Reply
Female 31
if u really think that wuz a ufo, you r a retard
0
Reply
Female 166
"...What will it take for the government to admit UFOs are real."

I`m pretty sure the government coined the term, "UFO." UFO means Unidentified Flying Object. This means that it isn`t identified, and there are things that are depicted in pictures and video that people can only speculate as to what they are. I don`t think the government denies the existence of unidentifiable objects. It`s the lack of concrete evidence that aliens exist, and have visited us that they don`t acknowledge.

That statement alone was enough to make this video not credible, and lame.
0
Reply
Male 749
That was funny. Clearly a small airplane, probably a low wing single engine like a Piper Warrior or Beach Bonanza. Someone was trying to teach themselves video editing.
0
Reply
Female 1,172
I`m all for conspiracies and fun stuff...but it`s a satellite catching the reflection of the sun...
0
Reply
Male 53
Lame. Vids that just cycle through the same scene over and over again just at different speeds (even cycling through speeds it used before) annoy me. Whoever made this probably had some sort of clipping problems with their "UFO" going behind the ISS. Hence why it just shows the same movement over and over again without showing the hole clip.
0
Reply
Male 14,774
Faaaaaake
0
Reply
Male 684
or it could be a satellite coming out from behind a shadow...
0
Reply
Male 37,888

[quote]What will it take to force the government and NASA to admit UFOs are real?" [/quote]
ummm.... how about actual proof.
this wasn`t even a good fake.


0
Reply
Male 220
IN space, you are either in darkness or light. Things suddenly appear and disappear all the f`ing time, especially with a camera focusing on a bright object which causes all other dim objects (like the stars) to disappear.

What will it take for rationalism to take hold in the general population?
0
Reply
Male 759
LOL apparently UFO`s use a GIF dithering cloak!
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Link: ISS Camera Catches UFO Uncloaking [Rate Link] - So Star Trek had that cloaking feature right as well. They were indeed ahead of their time.
0
Reply