The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

The Official Amazing Spider-Man Trailer


Watching this is giving me a wicked bad case of dj vu. Either that or my Spidey Sense is tingling.

[Total: 22    Average: 3/5]
70 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 11924
Rating: 3
Category: Entertainment
Date: 07/20/11 12:04 PM

70 Responses to The Official Amazing Spider-Man Trailer

  1. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2441 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:07 pm
    Link: The Official Amazing Spider-Man Trailer - Watching this is giving me a wicked bad case of dj vu. Either that or my Spidey Sense is tingling.
  2. Profile photo of Thjoass
    Thjoass Male 18-29
    53 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:15 pm
    so thats the, more or less, exact same movie again? and i gotta say, maybe im just getting old or something, but he just doesnt look like a peter parker....
  3. Profile photo of EgalM
    EgalM Male 30-39
    1707 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:17 pm
    "Sir we can`t talk Sam and crew into making a 4th, what should we do?"
    "drat it, start over"
    "What pretend the last three movies never happened?"
    "Yep, people are stupid, they`ll watch anything"

    Sadly I`d watch this, looks better than what they did already.
  4. Profile photo of Swaywithme
    Swaywithme Female 18-29
    3696 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:17 pm
    See, but this is a great type of movie to actually bother to see 3D- it`s obviously a film shot with those audiences in mind, rather than filming your movie and just converting it into 3D to jack up ticket sales
  5. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:17 pm
    That one part looked like a Mirror`s Edge sequel.
  6. Profile photo of lancelot
    lancelot Male 30-39
    50 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:21 pm
    WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
  7. Profile photo of DethRose
    DethRose Female 18-29
    280 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:22 pm
    They need to make make Spider-man movie with Morbius.
  8. Profile photo of nubblins
    nubblins Female 18-29
    1743 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:24 pm
    mehhhhh.. not necessary.
  9. Profile photo of lancelot
    lancelot Male 30-39
    50 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:25 pm
    actually, this reboot is because Sony refused to listen to Marvel. Marvel wanted Vulture for SM4 but Sony had other ideas. Marvel threatens to walk away, Sony thinks they`re bluffing. Marvel walks. Sony sh*ts their pants.
  10. Profile photo of davisboy
    davisboy Male 30-39
    587 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:25 pm
    Are we really so hard up for original material that we have to remake a movie every 10 years.

    Come on Hollywood, give me a sci-fi action flick that is new and original that hasn`t been done before. I beg you.
  11. Profile photo of davisboy
    davisboy Male 30-39
    587 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:29 pm
    Has anyone seen cowboys and aliens yet? Any good.
  12. Profile photo of swaffire
    swaffire Male 18-29
    67 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:29 pm
    i felt like i was playing mirrors edge there at the end
  13. Profile photo of earthshone
    earthshone Male 18-29
    1688 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:38 pm
    oh! I get it. this ones the "AMAZING" Spider-man... okay, that makes sense then.
  14. Profile photo of thejanitor86
    thejanitor86 Male 18-29
    63 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:42 pm
    well at least it looks like they fixed one major problem with the other spiderman movie series. him creating and shooting the web from his wrist. instead of what it was suppose to be which was a device that creates the web. you can see it on his palm in the reflection.
  15. Profile photo of grindinblade
    grindinblade Male 18-29
    234 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:44 pm
    Glad to see the web shooter at 1:12 like the comics, instead of the web shooting from the wrist like the other Spider-man movies.
  16. Profile photo of grindinblade
    grindinblade Male 18-29
    234 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:45 pm
    Damn Janitor beat me to it!
  17. Profile photo of Toider
    Toider Male 18-29
    452 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:45 pm
    Is it really necessary to explain the origin of spider-man? They could save us an hour of boring exposition by simply assuming we can do our own research if we even care.
  18. Profile photo of Beardofzeus
    Beardofzeus Male 30-39
    670 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:53 pm
    Next Summer, look out for
    Batman: the early years
    Jaws attacks
    Indiana Jones and the Portrait of destiny
    etc etc...
  19. Profile photo of Dhharrgoww
    Dhharrgoww Male 18-29
    101 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:56 pm
    Wait, another origin story for Spiderman? Already? God, this makes me feel old. I remember the watching the last first Spiderman remake in theaters.
  20. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:58 pm
    I thought we already did this... it could be good though. There is a 1% chance that I`ll see it.
  21. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36691 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 12:59 pm

    I wanted to see this until I saw the that trailer.

    We`ve already done the "how did he become spiderman" thing.
    It takes up too much of the film time.

    It`s a movie repost!
  22. Profile photo of megavidiot
    megavidiot Male 30-39
    901 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:04 pm
    I didn;t even know they were doing this. What a waste of time and money.
  23. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:12 pm
    Spiderman: The ultimate Parkour
  24. Profile photo of robosnitz
    robosnitz Male 40-49
    2737 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:23 pm
    megavidiot is right. ANOTHER origins movie? Absurd. Not even worth a bootleg DVD.
  25. Profile photo of Pheeshy5
    Pheeshy5 Male 18-29
    1312 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:28 pm
    Seems familiar, oh yea because this movie already came out within the last 10 years.
  26. Profile photo of elderban
    elderban Male 30-39
    390 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:46 pm
    I love Sony`s philosophy..."It didn`t make billions of dollars, therefore we have to reboot it". I though the last set of films were fine. This one is going to fail. Too early for a reboot.
  27. Profile photo of skypirate
    skypirate Male 18-29
    2415 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:49 pm
    wasnt the last one out like 4 years ago? do we really need a reboot this quick
  28. Profile photo of ScottSerious
    ScottSerious Male 18-29
    5316 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 1:50 pm
    i will most definitely not be seeing this.
  29. Profile photo of diylobotomy
    diylobotomy Male 18-29
    1832 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:04 pm
    I was actually excited about the movie before seeing this. I`ve already seen the first spiderman movie sooo uh... what`s the point?
  30. Profile photo of sebastian32
    sebastian32 Male 18-29
    14 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:09 pm
    Maybe you`re getting deja vu because you`re familiar with the story of Spiderman?
  31. Profile photo of 356094
    356094 Male 18-29
    109 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:12 pm
    The funny thing is that all you haters are still gonna go see it.

  32. Profile photo of Shaunoli
    Shaunoli Male 30-39
    64 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:16 pm
    AMAZING SPIDERMAN IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT COMIC WITH DIFFERENT WRITERS. tHE COMIC WAS MUCH DARKER AND GRAPHIC. SHOULD BE GOOD, BUT THEN AGAIN IM A SUPERHERO NERD I GUESS
  33. Profile photo of sl4d3
    sl4d3 Male 18-29
    32 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:38 pm
    a whole fking year?! FML
  34. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:55 pm
    The ending reminds me of Mirror`s edge
  35. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7470 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:16 pm
    im hopeful.

    angelmassb, that was a great game. i wish it did well enough to earn a sequel.
  36. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:17 pm
    ITs exactly the same as the other spiderman movies. why remake it in less than 10 years
  37. Profile photo of rogue_knight
    rogue_knight Male 40-49
    868 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:20 pm
    Looks like its ready to go so why do we ahve to wait a whole year?
  38. Profile photo of MrHoobToYou
    MrHoobToYou Male 40-49
    405 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:20 pm
    Shaunoli
    I THINK YOUR CAPSLOCK BUTTON IS JAMMED.
  39. Profile photo of darkmagic14n
    darkmagic14n Male 18-29
    1625 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:22 pm
    isn`t this ultimate spiderman?

    July 2012, thats a long wait...
  40. Profile photo of Rangerahab
    Rangerahab Male 18-29
    161 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:27 pm
    poo. And sure,I`m a hater and I`ll see it,but I`ll be damned if I`m paying any drating money for it.
  41. Profile photo of TR-Wolf
    TR-Wolf Male 18-29
    1557 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:42 pm
    3/4 in, it became Mirror`s Edge.

    I don`t see the point in a reboot of a movie series that`s not been out for very long at all. It`d be like rebooting Pirates of the Caribbean.
  42. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7470 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 3:44 pm
    fatninja, no, this one seems like it might actually follow the original storyline better.

    ps, i love emma stone as gwen stacy.
  43. Profile photo of ledgehead
    ledgehead Male 40-49
    633 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 4:31 pm
    I saw this already?
  44. Profile photo of ledgehead
    ledgehead Male 40-49
    633 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 4:32 pm
    What`s next remaking Harry Potter?
  45. Profile photo of nayrbarr
    nayrbarr Male 18-29
    366 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 5:27 pm
    Want some more grit with that reboot?
  46. Profile photo of joosen52
    joosen52 Male 18-29
    206 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 5:58 pm
    I really hope they keep the first person segments out of this film. The Doom movie tried it and it failed. Plus the graphics in that segment doesn`t look very good.
  47. Profile photo of phoneybone
    phoneybone Male 18-29
    1744 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 6:17 pm
    i`m a little torn with the "shoots web from wrists" vs "shoots web from web-shooters he made". On the one hand, wrists keep it simple and no silly plot device of "oh noes i ran out of web `juice`". On the other hand, when the baddies figured that out and then CRUSHED his web-shooters, so.... Damn, decisions decisions.
  48. Profile photo of marissameows
    marissameows Female 18-29
    171 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 6:31 pm
    i`d probably watch it just for the eye candy
  49. Profile photo of plastinum
    plastinum Male 30-39
    329 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 6:51 pm
    Hmmm looks like they are gonna go with the his parents were spies storyline, Gwen instead of MJ and that`s cool...but I agree with Phoneybone..I liked the webs from wrists instead of wrist shooters concept...it`s one thing to get bitten by a spider it`s another to ALSO happen to be able to invent the web and wrist shooters. I like the grittiness of this version though.
  50. Profile photo of Cynic8387
    Cynic8387 Male 18-29
    170 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 7:15 pm
    Doom actually pulled off the first person segments quite nicely. This is just a bad rip-off of Mirror`s Edge. And Mirror`s Edge wasn`t even a good game.
  51. Profile photo of KtySpix
    KtySpix Male 18-29
    621 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 7:28 pm
    Spidey makes me tingle ;3
  52. Profile photo of Batmanners
    Batmanners Male 18-29
    4006 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 8:16 pm
    "This is just a bad rip-off of Mirror`s Edge. And Mirror`s Edge wasn`t even a good game."

    No, but they thought a different gameplay mechanic would sell well. It was a very cool idea, but it just didn`t have enough to make a game on its own, which is why the mechanic has been applied to other games.
  53. Profile photo of NightHack
    NightHack Male 18-29
    204 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 8:25 pm
    Anybody who prefers the organic web approach doesn`t know what they`re talking about. The original comic book storyline had spidey using web shooters. The webs were never organic until much, much later after a comic book storyline that had to do with aliens or something. Anyway, the web shooters always made more sense.
  54. Profile photo of sickboyoao
    sickboyoao Male 18-29
    12 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 8:27 pm
    I don`t understand why anyone would think spiderman having the web shooting ability from his wrist naturally makes any sense. If it did come naturally, and he was like a spider, the web would shoot from his ass... just saying.
  55. Profile photo of nikkuchan
    nikkuchan Male 18-29
    144 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    Why are people still talking about organic web-shooters? It was just a device to quicken the narrative instead of having to spend the time showing a high-school kid developing something like that.

    On this trailer: It looks like it won`t be anywhere near as good as the original, and it will leave people wondering why in the hell they decided to reboot a successful series so quickly.
  56. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7470 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 9:30 pm
    nikkuchan, they decided to reboot so quickly because spider-man is such a big name and the originals were done. trying to continue the series without the same people would have turned out horribly.
  57. Profile photo of xKrazyKoalax
    xKrazyKoalax Male 18-29
    208 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 9:55 pm
    "successful series" commercially I suppose. The first was great and then the other two were products of a lame production staff that gave Sam Raimi the shaft. Would be nice if they gave him another shot, but whatever. Chris Nolan can`t do every movie, unfortunately.
  58. Profile photo of logandaninja
    logandaninja Male 13-17
    227 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 11:30 pm

  59. Profile photo of yagovaggo
    yagovaggo Male 30-39
    476 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 6:18 am
    TOO SOON!
  60. Profile photo of Enjin
    Enjin Male 30-39
    802 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 8:49 am
    Reboot it with new actors, fine. But we do not need to rehash the origin story over and over. Everyone who would go and see this movie knows who spiderman is and knows how he got his powers. There must be hundreds of interesting story lines they could have explored and made a fine movie. I really just don`t understand who the target audience is for this. What a waste of money.
  61. Profile photo of stonewar
    stonewar Female 30-39
    169 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 9:12 am
    well it seems he sits ont he floor of his bedroom alot.
  62. Profile photo of lazerdude
    lazerdude Male 13-17
    221 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 2:41 pm
    I believe it`s deja vu.
  63. Profile photo of RobSwindol
    RobSwindol Male 30-39
    2514 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 3:22 pm
    I could see remaking this if the original Tobey McGuire movie had bombed. But since it didn`t, I really don`t understand.

    Actually I kind of do understand. Hollywood knows that it`s easier to recycle old ideas than to come up with new ones.
  64. Profile photo of gymcoach29
    gymcoach29 Male 30-39
    363 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 3:25 pm
    No more original thought in Hollywood. Just a bunch of Idiots who steal someone elses story because they are too unimaginative to come up with their own.
  65. Profile photo of Joolin
    Joolin Male 18-29
    1002 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 5:20 pm
    I thought the idea of a reboot was to add something that was missing from the original or update it for a new generation 30 years later. This looks like the exact same thing but with different actors.
  66. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 10:55 pm
    REPOST!!!

    (Not you, Fancy, Columbia Pictures!)
  67. Profile photo of ledzeppeloyd
    ledzeppeloyd Male 18-29
    2385 posts
    July 22, 2011 at 12:17 am
    hollywood is not in the movie industry, they are in the money industry, thats why they make sequels and trilogy and prequles and remakes, because they know the first movie was good
  68. Profile photo of Zieveraar
    Zieveraar Male 30-39
    415 posts
    July 22, 2011 at 7:07 am
    Seems to be a bit darker imo, could just ofcourse be the result of the edit I guess. No point in this movie, but then there`s little point to most movies these days.
  69. Profile photo of bardockjerms
    bardockjerms Male 30-39
    232 posts
    July 22, 2011 at 11:15 am
    Not impressed, and that 3D sequence at the end looked dated, sub standard at best.
  70. Profile photo of ScaryMeadow
    ScaryMeadow Female 18-29
    189 posts
    July 22, 2011 at 11:36 am
    I agree with bardockjerms, the CGI here was terrible compared to standard quality on other films made recently.

    I won`t even pirate this movie, it didn`t seem interesting at all, even if I love comics.

Leave a Reply