The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 56    Average: 3.9/5]
82 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 13393
Rating: 3.9
Category:
Date: 07/18/11 09:12 AM

82 Responses to REAL Reason Liberals Don`t Like Bachmann & Palin

  1. Profile photo of kitteh9lives
    kitteh9lives Female 70 & Over
    8044 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 8:55 am
    Link: REAL Reason Liberals Don`t Like Bachmann & Palin - Republicans say that Liberals don`t like Bachmann & Palin because they are women. Bill Maher gives us the REAL reason!
  2. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2441 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:25 am
    I don`t like Palin or Bachmann as much as the next guy, but Bill Maher is a smarmy douche.
  3. Profile photo of rpmeaney
    rpmeaney Male 18-29
    24 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:26 am
    Werent Dems calling Republicans racists because they were going against Obama 2 years ago?
  4. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:29 am
    Derperals and Herpservatives
  5. Profile photo of plastinum
    plastinum Male 30-39
    329 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:29 am
    Maher is the man
  6. Profile photo of bankvole
    bankvole Male 30-39
    959 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:33 am
    Why do audiences on American TV shows have to do this moronic whooping and high pitched cheering during comedy routines. It makes them almost unwatchable.
  7. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36829 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:46 am

    A lot of name-calling at Sarah Palin without stating a single fact to back it up.

    Remember, he`s a comic, not a news source.

    P.S. I`m not a Palin fan, just sayin`
  8. Profile photo of DJDoubleb
    DJDoubleb Male 30-39
    382 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:02 am
    yes, rpmeaney.

    Both groups are 2 sides to the same twisted, bent, evil coin.
  9. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6235 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:08 am
    So, let me get this straight:

    Having an opinion that is other than flattering about Obama`s rising unemployment, record deficits or any other of his screwups = Racism.

    But

    Calling any female Republicans derogatory & disgusting names =/= Sexism?

    Hypocrisy much?

    One thing is true: Maher is a douche, and if he studies REAL hard, he may one day be qualified to be the village idiot.
  10. Profile photo of Oldfrt
    Oldfrt Male 50-59
    750 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:08 am
    Ah yes, the world of ideas. Way to debate the issues, Bill.
  11. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:17 am
    I always laugh when people say Democrats don`t like Palin and Bachmann because they`re women. Republicans on average are far more likely to be sexist and both women have insane political beliefs which is the real reason we don`t like them. I also don`t like people saying people dislike Obama because they`re racist without anything to back up their statement
  12. Profile photo of nayrbarr
    nayrbarr Male 18-29
    366 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:25 am
    @Gerry1of1, he doesn`t need to state facts in this particular instance as his entire audience is well aware of the history surrounding these two women. Your statement would make a good point if he was missing out evidence to skew the truth, but in this case it would have just been redundant as he is telling the truth and we a ll know it.
  13. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:27 am
    LillianDulci

    You don`t get out much do you? certainly met fewer Republicans than I have, and I am British.
  14. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:29 am
    This guy Maher`s an arrogant idiot. Just because someone disagrees with him they must be crazy. It so happens that they are very successful people, with far more reasoned arguments behind their views than he can muster.
  15. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:33 am
    nayrbarr

    No, the whole audience thinks they know the history. Instead they know what the left-wing news media tell them, which mainly consists of a mix of snide remarks and lies. They are a bunch of sheep, following Bill Maher who, as stated before, is an idiot.
  16. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:35 am
    He should have used the little Jesus snip to equate the following of those bimbos to blind faith, if anything. You can`t lump a whole group into one retarded category. It is just for show, so wtfe. Liberal this, conservative that. The system is broken if you think there are only two ways about it.
  17. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:38 am
    Angelmassb: YES!
  18. Profile photo of Rick_S
    Rick_S Male 40-49
    3290 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:38 am
    Let me set the record straight for THIS liberal. I LOVE These two women. Best way to ensure the Republican Party or the Tea Party isn`t in the White House next term is to let one of these two run against Obama.
  19. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:40 am
    randomxnp, I don`t know which opinion of mine you`re opposing, but I know many Republicans and I know the policies of many Republicans in office stand by everything I said. :)
  20. Profile photo of Machida
    Machida Male 18-29
    24 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:42 am
    I don`t follow american polictics much, but aren`t the Tea Party Movement just a bunch of racists reacting to Obama?
  21. Profile photo of Musuko42
    Musuko42 Male 18-29
    2850 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:43 am
    @randomxnp

    "Instead they know what the left-wing news media tell them, which mainly consists of a mix of snide remarks and lies. They are a bunch of sheep, following Bill Maher who, as stated before, is an idiot."

    It`s astonishing...you managed to make a statement, and then prove yourself to be hypocritical in relation to it in the very next sentence!

    In case I need to spell it out (and I`m sure I do), you accuse the other side of making "snide remarks", and then IMMEDIATELY follow with your own snide remarks.

    I`m amazed by your lack of self-awareness. I really am.
  22. Profile photo of randomxnp
    randomxnp Male 30-39
    1293 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:46 am
    If it`s not sexist, why the sexist rhetoric? http://bit.ly/qqQvcW
  23. Profile photo of defiantapple
    defiantapple Female 18-29
    28 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:50 am
    Meh. Both sides suck. Libertarian is the only way to go. :)
  24. Profile photo of BoredFrank
    BoredFrank Male 40-49
    2369 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:51 am
    I dislike Palin and Bachmann because they`re both imbeciles with idiotic agendas. Gender has nothing to do with it.
  25. Profile photo of whipplefunk
    whipplefunk Male 30-39
    1069 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:55 am
    Randomxnp,

    "This guy Maher`s an arrogant idiot.Just because someone disagrees with him they must be crazy."

    then you turn around and say,

    "They are a bunch of sheep, following Bill Maher who, as stated before, is an idiot."

    So just because someone disagrees with you, that makes them crazy? I smell a hypocrite.



  26. Profile photo of toastertown6
    toastertown6 Male 13-17
    57 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:55 am
    Machida, not at all, they don`t care who is in the white house, they just want smaller government.
  27. Profile photo of whipplefunk
    whipplefunk Male 30-39
    1069 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:56 am
    Musko beat me to it!
  28. Profile photo of spanz
    spanz Male 50-59
    893 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:56 am
    Democrats don`t like ANY woman for the job! Look at how they railroaded Hillary last time. Mahr is a hypocritical lunatic fringe douche bag! Anything coming out of his mouth is, by definition, a lie.
  29. Profile photo of bliznik
    bliznik Male 30-39
    866 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:06 am
    I actually liked Hillary, I just liked Obama more. Has nothing to do with sex, has everything to do with their platform and how well they interview.
  30. Profile photo of krisley
    krisley Male 18-29
    525 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:06 am
    @Machida, pretty much. @Rick S... but what if they WIN!?

    As for the video, meh. bunch of name-calling that wasn`t even funny anyway.
  31. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:08 am
    Once again, Bill Maher says a thing that is not funny, but tries to make it funny, but fails because the way he tries to make it funny is with lies.
  32. Profile photo of diylobotomy
    diylobotomy Male 18-29
    1832 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:08 am
    Machida, if its that obvious to you, how do you think we feel?

    Maher has an attitude that i dont really care for, but everything he said is true.
  33. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:18 am
    @Lillian: "You`re only voting for him because he`s black" <----- Republicans only said that when it was TRUE! That is not a racist statement. He carried 95% of black voters. Why? Moving on.

    @Machida: "I don`t follow american polictics much, but aren`t the Tea Party Movement just a bunch of racists reacting to Obama?" <--- No.

    @bliznik: "has everything to do with their platform and how well they interview." <---- Doesn`t matter if their entire platform is a lie. Good interviewers get a job at McDonald`s. Liars (On the scale of Obama) should never be elected.


  34. Profile photo of Sinclair
    Sinclair Male 30-39
    269 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:20 am
    @spanz : everything he says is a lie, even if you just saw proof? Bill Maher is quite brilliant.
  35. Profile photo of sallyfingers
    sallyfingers Female 13-17
    16 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:23 am
    Bill Maher`s a pretentious a*hole, but I must say that I agree with pretty much everything he says...just not exactly the way he says it.
  36. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36829 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:50 am

    Bill is often funny.
    This is not one of those times though
  37. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:51 am
    "People only voted for him because he`s black" is true because "He carried 95% of black voters."?

    How about "People only voted for him because he`s a genius" -> "He carried 85% of the PhD voters".

    And you`re the one claiming lies?

    He would have won even if you discounted ALL black voters. He carried the white vote. He carried the Hispanic vote. He carried the female vote. He carried EVERY vote EXCEPT specifically White males over 65.

    So, John McCain only got any votes because he`s old? The above, is applying your logic to any other measure.

    "The Republicans only say it when it`s true" is bullpoo. They say it when convenient. As the above demonstrates, because you AREN`T saying any of the above.

    You`re only picking the one you think you`ll get away with.
  38. Profile photo of Buzzard250
    Buzzard250 Male 18-29
    342 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:57 am
    Haha he says it like it is. Bachmann looks like one of the WKuK when they are in drag by the way.
  39. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 12:23 pm
    @Baal: So you`re discounting the white people that voted for him because of "black guilt" as well.

    Also, You never denied my statement. He carried 95% of the black vote, which is true, but how many of those were "because he`s black"?

    Well let`s see. The way to see the difference is to look at the number of people who voted that were black in the 2004 election, and again in the 2008 election.

    2004 - 13% of registered black voters went to the polls.

    2008 - 83% of registered black voters went to the polls.

    You cannot, in good faith, say that it wasn`t motivated by race. Blacks also accounted for 20% of his total votes, so by your logic, if they were discounted, he loses.

    15% of his votes also came from Hispanics. Democrats better hope the Republican candidate does not pick Rubio as a running mate, or he loses all those. If the ticket is Herman Cain/Marco Rubio? Well then he can forget it.
  40. Profile photo of MichaelBored
    MichaelBored Male 40-49
    206 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 12:33 pm
    "If the ticket is Herman Cain/Marco Rubio? Well then he can forget it."

    ....*snkkk*....ummm...really, dude? You believe that? For real?

    That`s SO adorable!
  41. Profile photo of paddy215
    paddy215 Male 18-29
    1677 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 12:37 pm
    What is this dude? Is he supposed to be a political correspondent? A comedian? Because he badly fails at both. Seriously, how can anyone, regardless of political affiliation, actually like someone this slimey?
  42. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 12:39 pm
    @Michael: No I don`t believe that. I was making a racist comment.

    I do believe Rubio will lock down the Hispanic vote though.
  43. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    6235 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 1:25 pm
    Baalthazaq-"How about "People only voted for him because he`s a genius" -> "He carried 85% of the PhD voters".

    Point one: It has not been demonstrated that Obama is a genius. He will not release his college transcript or his papers. Actually, the opposite has been demonstrated (57 states, Corpseman, etc).

    Point two: 85% of PhD`s? Got a cite for that? Or did you pull it out of your posterior? The only reports I have found only list the top education level as `College graduate`, and he only carried 53% of that. So, barring a cite, I call bullpoo on your claim.

    The exit polls showed that your were more likely to vote for Obama the less education you had. Those that did not complete High School voted for Obama 66% to 32%, whereas he carried college graduate only 53% to 45%.
  44. Profile photo of MichaelBored
    MichaelBored Male 40-49
    206 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 1:44 pm
    @auburnjunky: "I do believe Rubio will lock down the Hispanic vote though."

    So let`s say for the sake of argument that Rubio gets the nomination, even the VP slot. Rubio supports the Arizona immigration laws and E-Verify system and oppses the DREAM Act. His positions on immigration policy are no different from those of every other Republican whose popularity with the Hispanic community is at record lows. But just because he`s Cuban, he`s gonna have the Hispanic vote locked down.

    So. Damn. Cute!
  45. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 2:26 pm
    Okay Michael. Deny that Obama carried 95% of the black vote, because he was black.
  46. Profile photo of TypicalJerk
    TypicalJerk Male 18-29
    533 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 2:28 pm
    -So. Damn. Cute!-

    Yes. You do know that most Hispanic/Latinos generally vote republican any way, right? it has something to do with the whole religious background thing. And while most don`t agree entirely on the immigration issues in this party, they are always told that they are going to fix those issues (This is how elections work, amirite?) Pressing on, one of the main reasons this doesn`t often help as much as the party might think it should, is the same reason that it fails. They are appealing to the crowd that can not vote ANYWAY. so McCain went immigration, Obama went health care. I wonder what went wrong there. The Republicans don`t NEED a Hispanic/Latino to lock that demographics vote. Either way, It`s looking pretty grim for a Cain/Rubio ticket if Clinton swoops in for the kill. This thought scares me.
  47. Profile photo of MichaelBored
    MichaelBored Male 40-49
    206 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 2:38 pm
    @TypicalJerk: "Yes. You do know that most Hispanic/Latinos generally vote republican any way, right?"

    No. I didn`t. But that`s only because in the last 30 years of presidential elections, Democrats have gotten no less than 56% of the Hispanic vote. Maybe they vote Republican in greater percentages in local and state elections, but that`s not what we`re talking about.
  48. Profile photo of MichaelBored
    MichaelBored Male 40-49
    206 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 2:46 pm
    @auburnjunky: "Deny that Obama carried 95% of the black vote, because he was black."

    I wouldn`t know. He may have. Do more white people vote for a white candidate because they`re white? Or are minorities the only ones who put cultural identity before policy?
  49. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 3:02 pm
    @Michael: I don`t THINK so, just because the candidates have traditionally been white. What I do know is this.

    2004 - 13% of registered black voters went to the polls.

    2008 - 83% of registered black voters went to the polls.

    Yes I know I posted that earlier, but to me, it`s very telling.

  50. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 3:08 pm
    meh...
  51. Profile photo of crudson
    crudson Male 18-29
    589 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 3:14 pm
    I for one welcome our new fem-bot overlords
  52. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    33070 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 3:55 pm
    Yawn! Bill manages to slam every `boogieman` on the left`s hit-list. Women, Christians, right-thinking folks...

    Oh wait, the left has just informed me that I`ve insulted Barack Obama by using the term "boogieman".

    They deny sexism while playing the `race card` at EVERY opportunity. That`s the left for you!
  53. Profile photo of LuckyDave
    LuckyDave Male 18-29
    675 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 4:28 pm
    I thought the whole point of having a 2 party system was so the two could find middle ground. Then it became a war of who`s right, not what`s right.
  54. Profile photo of CodeJockey
    CodeJockey Male 40-49
    5611 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 5:00 pm
    Auburn, that`s not that telling.
    2000, 2004 had some of the lowest voter percentages.
    2008 had next to the highest percentage ever.
    EVERYBODY showed.

    Like with Kerry, I think they showed to vote
    against McCain.
    The guy`s response on fuel was not sane.
    Obama`s response, which he just made good, showed he
    considered the realities of everyday life.

    I have no doubt that if McCain had won,
    this place would have completely 1933`d while he entertained.
    The guy just does not think ahead.
    Neither does Clinton, Palin, Gingrich who doesn`t know to tell his staff to break or
    Bachmann who got busted on 3 verbal gaffes in the first 2 days of campaigning.

    If Bachmann actually used bible ref stating she
    follows her husband`s orders, beyond the obvious,
    it also says a woman is never to be in charge men.
    In the culture that produced the Old Testament, women were property.
  55. Profile photo of phoneybone
    phoneybone Male 18-29
    1744 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 5:05 pm
    i`m a repub and I don`t like them either. they`re both giant pieces of poo with retarded ideas. may the fail horribly
  56. Profile photo of OutWest
    OutWest Male 50-59
    546 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 5:16 pm
    He`s just the funniest.... my lib leg is tingling!
  57. Profile photo of infantry0
    infantry0 Male 30-39
    164 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 5:29 pm
    Not a fan of Bachman or Palin, but I sure do wish someone would beat Mahr in the face with a sledgehammer. Or pour battery acid over his head.
  58. Profile photo of dreambrother
    dreambrother Male 18-29
    102 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 5:47 pm
    Ramirez! High-five that man immediately!
  59. Profile photo of SephirothA83
    SephirothA83 Male 18-29
    955 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 6:12 pm
    lol awesome
  60. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36829 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 6:41 pm

    I like Hermain Cain.
    He said recently that Americans have the right to ban Mosques. Story

    now THAT`s racism we can all get behind!


  61. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 6:48 pm
    Hey Gerry. Huffington Post huh?

    Should I post something from Fox News?

    Same difference.
  62. Profile photo of test-user564
    test-user564 Male 18-29
    490 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 7:07 pm
    @infantry0 agreed
  63. Profile photo of nubblins
    nubblins Female 18-29
    1743 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 7:55 pm
    Oh hai! Just joining another IAB political debate.
  64. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36829 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 8:28 pm

    Hey Auburn, everyone carried the story, it`s true.
  65. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 9:12 pm
    Didn`t say it wasn`t.
  66. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 10:16 pm
    Yeah, I don`t like either of `em. But not because they`re Republicans, not because they`re conservatives, not because they`re women. Despite personal accusations of me being a kool-aid drinking libtard who watches to much MSM (looking at you 5Cats. I have no idea what kool-aid is, I have a PhD so am probably not a `tard, and I don`t watch news media of any kind)...

    No, my problem with both these vacuous bints is that they would both have (Christian) creationism taught alongside evolution in school classrooms.

    The US is in enough trouble as it is, without reverting science education back to the f*cking stone age.

    Don`t f*ck with science, ladies.
  67. Profile photo of Hightech90
    Hightech90 Male 18-29
    72 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:47 pm
    @davymid

    I don`t really have a problem with evolution or creationism being taught in schools. Personally I think they should BOTH be taught. I believe people should have the freedom to choose for themselves. We shouldn`t rule out creationism because science can`t disprove that creation happened, but science has also given us another possibility with evolution. If you think science should rule, then let it disprove creationism before we completely take it out of the schools. I personally don`t know which one happened, even though I lean creationism because it makes the most sense to me. Really there are more important things to worry about in my opinion.

    Really everyone should question everything including the things that are taught in schools. Math of course is the only thing that is clear fact, but other things such as History and Science could just be told by whoever is writing the books. Case point the reasons for the civil war, but thats another topic for a diffe
  68. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:48 pm
    davymid: Neither of them have made statements that they would replace science with creationism, So that`s just an ad-hominem attack.

    Besides, no president can force any agenda being taught in schools, the states and local school boards decide curriculum.
  69. Profile photo of Hightech90
    Hightech90 Male 18-29
    72 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:48 pm
    different time*
  70. Profile photo of jinxiejae
    jinxiejae Female 30-39
    2927 posts
    July 18, 2011 at 11:53 pm
    damn bill, i dont like them either, but harsh much?
  71. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 12:24 am
    "@davymid I don`t really have a problem with evolution or creationism being taught in schools. Personally I think they should BOTH be taught. I believe people should have the freedom to choose for themselves."

    Yeah. Hear ya. Teach the theory of geocentricity while you`re at it. Heck, teach kids alchemy in chemistry class. Lead can turn to gold, right? Teach astrology hand-in-hand with astronomy while you`re at it. Let the kids decide!

    Deeply retarded, religious, mumbo-jumbo bullsh*t. Do yourself a favour, and stop talking.
  72. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 12:26 am
    "davymid: Neither of them have made statements that they would replace science with creationism, So that`s just an ad-hominem attack."

    Well, there`s THIS from Sarah Palin and them there`s THIS from Michele Bachman. That ain`t Ad Hominem, dude, that`s pointing a finger at assh*les and proclaiming "There be assh*les!". Simple, really.

    Look, I think they`re both f*cking mental. But the voters will decide, I`m just one vote. I think you`ll find that people are more intelligent than you give them credit for.
  73. Profile photo of xCYBERDYNEx
    xCYBERDYNEx Male 18-29
    4903 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 3:10 am
    Bill Maher is a cvnt, but I have to agree with him on those 2, they are even bigger cvnts
  74. Profile photo of xCYBERDYNEx
    xCYBERDYNEx Male 18-29
    4903 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 3:16 am
    @davymid
    agreed
  75. Profile photo of Ozmose
    Ozmose Male 30-39
    448 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 5:18 am
    The funniest thing about this is, Hannity edited the living hell out of this clip on his show last night and called it sexist.
  76. Profile photo of aliyahg1979
    aliyahg1979 Female 30-39
    254 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 6:17 am
    @davymid indeed!
  77. Profile photo of MichaelBored
    MichaelBored Male 40-49
    206 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 8:16 am
    @auburnjunky: "2004 - 13% of registered black voters went to the polls.

    2008 - 83% of registered black voters went to the polls.

    Yes I know I posted that earlier, but to me, it`s very telling."

    Yes, I know you think it`s very telling. You think that all those black people voted for Obama JUST because he was black, just like you think Rubio would "lock down" the Hispanic vote JUST because he`s Latino, because you don`t believe minorities are capable of voting for someone based on anything other than cultural identification.

    But then, the last time I had a conversation with you 3 months ago, you were busy selectively quoting from Obama`s book to make HIM look like a racist, even though you took actual quotes out of context and "quoted" him as saying things he never actually said.

    And THAT is very telling.
  78. Profile photo of Pheeshy5
    Pheeshy5 Male 18-29
    1312 posts
    July 19, 2011 at 8:53 am
    Mark Cuban is a douche, Maher is ok though
  79. Profile photo of KittenCereal
    KittenCereal Female 18-29
    956 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 2:36 pm
    I love this man.
  80. Profile photo of Ruffiana
    Ruffiana Male 30-39
    506 posts
    July 20, 2011 at 7:50 pm
    My parents are ultra-right-wing, conservative, holy-rolling Republicans living in the heart of the bible belt...and they think Sarah Palin is an idiot as well.

    Probably because they blame her for costing McCain the election or something, but in this current political environement it`s common ground damnit!
  81. Profile photo of calculator
    calculator Male 18-29
    29 posts
    July 21, 2011 at 7:29 am
    If anyone cares about the national interest they would think twice about how much they care about personality over policy issues.
  82. Profile photo of sicker
    sicker Female 30-39
    325 posts
    July 23, 2011 at 7:52 am
    When people start voting for what is best - not for themselves, but for their country and countrymen - -that- is when we will stop seeing buffoons like Sarah Palin on the cover of a magazine.

Leave a Reply