Father And Daughter In A Sexual Relationship

Submitted by: spandi 6 years ago in Weird

This is just full of wrong.
There are 74 comments:
Female 124
@SuperNOOB: Good point. I think this TV show host is the one doing the preying. He`s just picking at them mercilessly, and I`m more bothered by him and his disgustingly closed-minded view of these two people he knows close to nothing about than the father and daughter- especially when the dad said that he saw her as his soul mate.
However what was gross about it was how the two made out like that on stage. That was simply uncalled for regardless of how they were truly related to each other.
0
Reply
Male 270
So what? She`s legal, there both consenting adults, they obviously truly love each other and they don`t want to have a kid (Though that shouldn`t matter. Not every kid born of two siblings is retarded, malformed, etc.).

This is just as bad as people who are against gays, Bi-sexual`s, polygamy, the guy/gal being 15+ years older than the partner, etc.

Let people love who they want to d*** it.
0
Reply
Male 1,312
This is just weird.
0
Reply
Female 25
@skytz1337 He sent her a smiley face. Bitches love smiley faces.
0
Reply
Female 412
OMG Steve has his own show? XD
0
Reply
Female 999
I call fake
0
Reply
Female 682
so...i wish i had audio on my computer. lip reading only goes so far...
0
Reply
Male 687
let me get this right ... she was "interested" in her father because he put a smiley face in a myspace message...seriously...WTF?!!
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]There`s a proper medical reason not to do this though, any children would be subject to genetic problems (or at least that`s what I understand of it)[/quote]

Not quite. There`s an increased risk of genetic problems, but it`s far from a certainty. You can`t say that "any children would be subject to genetic problems". Some would, some wouldn`t. The proportion who would be is significantly higher than normal, but it isn`t all of them.

There`s also an increased risk in general if it was common because it would reduce genetic diversity.

[quote]There`s a reason that even animals won`t do this[/quote]

i) Some animals do.
ii) Humans are capable of thought, so the same rules don`t apply.

So, for example, a dog has only the instinct of "smells too much like me to mate with" but a human can use thought to known if conception is impossible (i.e. homosexuality or heterosexuality in which either or both are infertile).
0
Reply
Female 437
There`s a proper medical reason not to do this though, any children would be subject to genetic problems (or at least that`s what I understand of it) There`s a reason that even animals won`t do this
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Personally, I think the law should be based on something better than whichever group of people have enough power to get their own arbritary rules imposed on everyone.

The root of the law should be the prevention of harm, not a weapon to be used by whoever has enough power to make up some rules, label them "morality" and force them on everyone.

So I think the proper question with regards to the law is "Does it cause harm?" and not "Is it immoral?".

Incest is a grey area because if there is a chance of pregnancy then it can cause harm.

Homosexuality isn`t a grey area because it doesn`t cause harm.

So they`re not the same and the slippery slope argument fails.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
I`d like to point out that despite how 5Cats has made it look in his post I did not write

[quote]...it`s immoral to define marriage to exclude INCESTUOUS relationships[/quote]

or

[quote]...it`s immoral to define marriage to exclude HUMAN-ANIMAL relationships[/quote]

Also, the remaining part of my post was the important part:

[quote]So why do you think you should get to define morality for everyone and legally impose it on everyone, but I shouldn`t?[/quote]
0
Reply
Male 17,511
ruthless: Let me use the standard homosexual marriage excuse on you, "But it`s two consenting adults, You have no right to decide for them what is right or wrong !".

Just because they are adults, and they are of age of consent, does NOT make it Moral or a `Right` to do so.
0
Reply
Male 40,764
[quote]There was a period of fairly widespread debauchery towards the fall of the republic[/quote]
@Angilion - your point is valid, but this decadent period is what I`m referring to. We can`t even used "Soddom & Gahmorrah" as examples of decline anymore, eh? Many people nowadays think they were great places!

[quote]...it`s immoral to define marriage to exclude INCESTUOUS relationships[/quote]
fify! Also:

[quote]...it`s immoral to define marriage to exclude HUMAN-ANIMAL relationships[/quote]
It`s just a matter of time before you can legally marry your german shepard.
0
Reply
Male 177
I honestly couldn`t care less about what they do. If that`s what they want to do and it makes them happy, go for it.
0
Reply
Female 3,001
whether fake or real its still wrong, and you don`t have to be a Christian to understand that. its illegal for a reason.
0
Reply
Female 734
Wasn`t he one of the bouncers on Jerry Springer?
0
Reply
Male 438
pics or it didn`t happen...wait no...NOOOOOOO!!!
0
Reply
Male 122
For all you doomsday Christians, you realize that for things like this you can assume the null is valid.

This situation is too far out, this is fake, they are actors. She is attractive, in addition they are doing something very socially taboo. If this were true, they would probably do it on secret and not go on TV to be hated.

This is fake, go back to reading the bible and then cheating on your wife.
0
Reply
Male 1,526
:D LOL!
Well, whatever. To bad about not having children tho, big chance it would be deformed. Butt a small small chance of it getting a mutation that would benefit it.
Man that host was judgmental, they were two conceding adults. And were not causing anyone physical harm. The big man still needs to grow up.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]The slippery slope is already upon us folx. If the word marriage is not defined morally and legally under no uncertain terms, it will end up being dragged through the gutter immorally.

We are slowly being desensitized to this immorality and eventually it will become as seemingly `normal` as homosexuality is now.[/quote]

I say that it`s immoral to define marriage to exclude homosexual relationships.

So why do you think you should get to define morality for everyone and legally impose it on everyone, but I shouldn`t?
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Welcome to liberation people! Society`s rules are being removed one by one, soon enough it will be "anything goes!" just like ancient Rome...[/quote]

Apart from the fact that ancient Rome was generally a pretty moralistic place. The image many people have of ancient Rome is not well based in truth. There was a period of fairly widespread debauchery towards the fall of the republic, but that was an anomaly as society was collapsing.

If you substitued somewhere like Baiae instead of Rome you`d be closer to the truth, but places like that were themselves anomalous - they were essentially party resorts for very rich Romans and they were frequently criticised in Rome for immorality (which, of course, made them more attractive).
0
Reply
Male 2,592
fake fake fake fake fake
0
Reply
Male 17,511
The slippery slope is already upon us folx. If the word marriage is not defined morally and legally under no uncertain terms, it will end up being dragged through the gutter immorally.

We are slowly being desensitized to this immorality and eventually it will become as seemingly `normal` as homosexuality is now.
0
Reply
Male 2,085
Didn`t we see this gag in Jackass 3D?
0
Reply
Male 253
Yes, Alex, I`d like "Fake" for $500.

On the other hand, two consenting adults, right?
0
Reply
Male 559
gross
0
Reply
Male 25,416
I didnt know that Springer past the power to Steve.
0
Reply
Female 50
fake fake fake
0
Reply
Male 247
Incest stories aren`t new.
0
Reply
Male 1,745
Careful, these shows have scripted the stories, faked names and then hired actors in the past. It`s all under the guise of "entertainment" and not illegal.
0
Reply
Male 360
the crappy neck tattoo says this just might be real.
if it`s on wilkos it must be true right? -morons. the concept is still pretty nasty.
0
Reply
Male 1,625
FAAAAAKE.
0
Reply
Male 7
O_O American entertainment all meant for shock value, DNA test to prove it.
0
Reply
Female 614
hope her mom kicked her in the butt and never talked to her again if this is real. its kinda sickening.
0
Reply
Male 2,422
Only problem I see is if they have kids and if it was coercive. If not, it`s none of my goddamn business no matter how much it creeps me out. Also not real, I`m just saying hypothetically.
0
Reply
Male 3,076
this is just a PR stunt, now they can finaly start their own site ;)
0
Reply
Male 1,629
*sigh* i hate these shows, they are fake people...
0
Reply
Female 171
Meh I think this is fake. When they started kissing it just seemed as though the show organised it for shock factor.
0
Reply
Male 4,902

0
Reply
Male 47
Wait a minute... Some of you guys actually think that this is real ?
0
Reply
Male 676
Wow this turned me on... Am I going to hell for that?...
0
Reply
Female 2,026
thats disgusting, they do need help
0
Reply
Male 61
Lazarus Long, this sick-o is not.
0
Reply
Male 1,485
life would be boring if we didnt cross the line every now and again
0
Reply
Female 189
Obviously, having children together would be very irresponsible because of the high risk that their children would end up somehow disabled or challenged, if they even survived the pregnancy.

Other than that, whatever makes these two people happy. :)
0
Reply
Male 40,764
Welcome to liberation people! Society`s rules are being removed one by one, soon enough it will be "anything goes!" just like ancient Rome...
0
Reply
Male 3,894
I guess it`s kind of gross, conceptually, but if I hadn`t been told they were father and daughter I`d just see another couple. It doesn`t look like an abusive relationship at all.

The guy`s totally exaggerating when it comes to "you need to wake up from this bad dream," etc. Show me how this is negatively impacting her life moreso than any other relationship, and I`ll denounce it.

...otherwise, I`ll just shudder and look the other way because it`s none of my goddamn business.
0
Reply
Male 315
There is no "line" anymore man.
0
Reply
Female 295
WAIT!

...what evidence? o.O
0
Reply
Female 188
next move a porn movie!

I call this a fake.sorry. I don`t even know this show and I think it is full of crap
0
Reply
Female 52
forsquirel, this show was a loooong time ago..
0
Reply
Male 39,931

[quote]"I have two daughters. This is wrong on so many levels." [/quote]

Two daughters and you STILL can`t get a date!

That sucks dude.

0
Reply
Male 697
Why do they feel the need to make out in front of everyone? Attention seeking much
0
Reply
Male 2,389
that`s so Takei..

I seriously need to get out from under my rock or away from IAB more. When did Steve get a show?
0
Reply
Female 737
... Did they bring DNA test to prove they are what they claim they are?

I don`t doubt this could happen, its called Genetic Sexual attraction and it occurs only when family members were apart for the childs first decade. Its actually quite common, having said that I still do not know how you can let yourself go on to TV like this to be ridiculed, and therefore I call the dreaded fake.
0
Reply
Male 168
"I have two daughters. This is wrong on so many levels."

Of course it is wrong! You must not have two girlfriends at the same time! Pity an you!
0
Reply
Male 3,060
i can`t stand steve wilkos or his s h i t ass show.
0
Reply
Male 5
Q: Who is your daddy, and what does he do?

A: My boyfriend, and me.
0
Reply
Male 2,551
They`re both consenting adults?
They aren`t going to have children?
I don`t really see a problem here, aside from it being seen as wrong by society. They can do what they want as far as I`m concenred.

It`s seen as wrong because most of us do not have such feelings for family members (not sure of specifics, but growing up with someone makes you not want to sleep with them; to promote diversity of genes or something). This was taken away from them, but they do not want to have children anyway, therefore there isn`t as large a chance that they will have a `disabled` child.

Just prudes being prudes I guess.
0
Reply
Male 39,931

Vice may be nice but incest is best!
0
Reply
Male 39,931

@ GullCull - calm down dude. and is there something you want to tell us?
0
Reply
Male 43
No this is full of win. INCEST IS WINCEST
0
Reply
Female 45
STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVE
0
Reply
Male 143
Honestly what`s the big deal? Just because you think it`s "weird" or "sick" they should stop doing it?

He said he wont cross the line and have children so it`s not affecting anyone else but themselves. Let two adults enjoy their life if they want and get back to sorting out your own problems.

It`s not like it`s any of your business in the first place and we all know this is fake right?
0
Reply
Male 39,931

Who`s your daddy?
0
Reply
Female 843
I was kind of only half listening, but I think I heard that her family took her away from her father when she was 7 (or something along those lines). There was probably a reason for that and I`m feeling like him being a perverted freak is that reason.

Also, I had to laugh at his reasoning for not wanting children. He won`t cross that line, that`s pretty funny.
0
Reply
Male 143
Love does not have boundaries.
0
Reply
Male 2,796
Much more common than many think...
0
Reply
Male 116
I have two daughters. This is wrong on so many levels.
0
Reply
Male 6,737
D:
0
Reply
Female 1,682
...This is just...weird. Seriously. It`s actually a bit disgusting.
0
Reply
Male 1,341
Well, there goes my breakfast.
0
Reply
Male 118
Link: Father And Daughter In A Sexual Relationship [Rate Link] - This is just full of wrong.
0
Reply