Oral Sex Now Leading Cause Of Increased Cancer

Submitted by: MOTBO 5 years ago Science
http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2011/02/22/2011-02-22_oral_sex_is_leading_cause_of_increasing_us_cancer_rates_compared_to_tobacco_use_.html

Stupid science ruining life one thing at a time.
There are 118 comments:
Female 1,101
P.S. You`re still a misogynist f-ck tard that`s intimidated by a woman who demands equal sexual satisfaction. You can whine about what you did for your girlfriend all you want, no normal person would say that Obgirl was being unreasonable or that she should preform oral sex regardless of whether she wanted to or not without return.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Angilion Blah, blah, blah.

Look- I personally don`t care what you did (or say that you did) behind closed doors with your so called girlfriend.

But, you certainly would not have been a "prostitute" if you had told her that you did not want to give her oral sex because you felt that it was unfair for it to be a one way deal.

If you liked it and wanted to do it then more power to you, but if you only felt lukewarm about doing it then perhaps you would have said I do not want to put in the effort without any return.

Or if you absolutely wanted oral sex sometimes in your relationship it may have been a deal breaker.

Just because you settled for a relationship where you did not receive oral sex does not mean that everyone wants to do that.

People are entitled to walk away from relationships for any reason, or decline to preform sexual favors for any reason they so deem worthy. It does not make them "prostitutes".
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Also, what about BDSM? Granted, some BDSMers switch, but not all do. By your argument, every BDSMer must switch 50/50 *even if neither person wants to*. You really think that`s healthy?

I spent some years in a relationship with a woman who didn`t like fellatio. Some people don`t, that`s just how it is. Do you think I should have refused cunnilingus even though we both liked it? Why? What purpose would that have served? Should I ring her up now and tell her she owes me maybe a couple of hundred blowjobs whether she likes it or not?

I regard your position as abuse, simple as that.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Besides there is really no reason why a man should not want to perform oral sex on his partner when he is fine with the practice on himself.[/quote]

Yes there is, just as there are reasons why a woman might not want to perform oral sex on a man when she`s fine with him going down on her, or the same with two men or with two women, or the same for any other sexual activity.

The reason is a simple one - people should not be coerced into any sexual activity they don`t like.

At least, I think they shouldn`t. You clearly see no problem with coercing men into sex they don`t like.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]A relationship where one partner withholds sexual pleasure from the other and then expects to be sexually satisfied themselves is an unhealthy relationship.[/quote]

But you`re the only person who`s made any mention of such a relationship. So who are you arguing with?
0
Reply
Male 10,845
@Angillion and NotTHATBored

Com`on you two


"I earned my mustache, I`d like it back please."
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Angilion

I am half trolling.

While it really is hilarious to make you angry and watch you post all kinds of bogus examples and unintelligible garb in an attempt to defend your view point, I also know I`m right.

Anyway sex therapists agree, a relationship where both partners take turns satisfying each others sexual needs (oral or otherwise) is a healthy relationship.

A relationship where one partner withholds sexual pleasure from the other and then expects to be sexually satisfied themselves is an unhealthy relationship.

Thus it is unhealthy for a person to be expected
to sexually satisfy their partner without being sexually satisfied themselves. It creates the sense that one`s needs are not equal.

Besides there is really no reason why a man should not want to perform oral sex on his partner when he is fine with the practice on himself.

Ask any sexual therapist. I am right. The End.

0
Reply
Male 12,365
Also, don`t think I haven`t noticed that you`ve refused to clarify your position on how much sexism you add to your opinion on coercing people into sexual acts they don`t want to do.

It`s because your sexism is total, isn`t it? You think it`s so great when a woman does it to a man that it`s hatred of women to object to it. You think completely differently about a man doing it to a woman, don`t you?
0
Reply
Male 12,365
If you aren`t just trolling and you really do require coercing your partner into things they don`t want to do in order for you to get off, then your claims of superiority are clearly delusional.

If you aren`t just trolling and you really do think that it`s hatred of women to consider it wrong to coerce people into sexual activity they don`t want to do, then your claims of superiority are clearly delusional.

You`re also obsessed with oral sex for some reason, but that`s a far more minor thing than the above two.

Bottom line:

Either you`re trolling or you`re an extremely unpleasant person who gets off on coercing people into sex and who likes making false accusations.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Ha ha really p-ssed you off didn`t I?

Good, that`s what I was aiming for.[/quote]

So you`re just trolling.

Well done. You`ve realised that sexism and abuse offend and anger me. Whoopie-do for you. Have a cookie.

Well, at least it`s better than you really being the foul bigot you`ve been pretending to be.

You are pretending, right?
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Give and ya shall receive. It`s a good principal for life. If you don`t give you can`t just expect to keep receiving.

I expect you have learned this the hard way.

Ob girl threatens you because she knows what she wants out of a relationship, sexually, and if she doesn`t get it then she`s not willing to stick around and put effort (oral) into someone else`s pleasure.

Maybe it makes you feel insecure because you don`t have that certainty? Maybe you don`t like a woman having sexual power because you don`t have much sex or power.

Who knows...???

0
Reply
Female 1,101
If you are so righteous though and you don`t believe in "coercing sexual favors" then why would think that a woman is wrong for not wanting to do give oral sex when they can never expect to receive it back?

Do you just say to your partner "Hey you`re a prostitute"? Because your mad that they won`t scratch your back all the time without having their back scratched? Now that is coercion.

Sounds like your a pretty selfish person too.

Anywho- I`m younger than you, I`m smarter than you, my sex life is safer than yours, my sex life is better than yours, my partner is better than any you could manage, and I am willing to bet that I get a whole lot more oral. So in the end your misogynist a-- loses in the game of life Angilion.

:-)
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Angilion

"I realize that I should just leave you to crawl back under your rock."

"You really are a bottom-feeding lowlife."

Ha ha really p-ssed you off didn`t I?

Good, that`s what I was aiming for. :-)

Look Angilion- it all comes down to this. I really don`t care if you eat the dried out poon tang that you occasionally manage to get at your age, but a man who asks for oral sex without being willing to give it is a prude and a bad lover. A man who thinks that a woman who asks for oral sex, pleasure, in return for giving it is a "prostitute" CLEARLY has some underlying issues with women and some very misogynist ideas. I would say that you are threatened by a women who expects sexual satisfaction. So really it is what it is- and most normal human beings would agree.

If you are so righteous though and you don`t believe in "coercing sexual favors" then why would think that a partner was wrong fo
0
Reply
Male 25,416
you gotta do what you gotta do
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote](who is she talking to?) O.o[/quote]

A person who she has made up and is pretending is me for the purposes of defaming me.

I think it`s wrong to use another person`s feelings as a lever to coerce them into sexual activity they don`t want to do because that would get you off.

She`s claiming that means I hate women.

Obviously, she`s a deeply unpleasant person.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Thank you for once again proving that you are a hypocrite as well as a bigot and a liar.

You really are a bottom-feeding lowlife.

I realise that I should just leave you to crawl back under your rock, but I have another question for you:

You think it is hatred of women to think that it is wrong for a woman to abuse a man`s emotional ties to him as a tool to coerce him into sexual activities he doesn`t want to do. You have said so repeatedly and vehemently, so you clearly mean it.

Do you think it is hatred of men to think that it is wrong for a man to abuse a woman`s emotional ties to him as a tool to coerce her into sexual activities she doesn`t want to do?

In other words, do you add more sexist hypocrisy to your rather unpleasant ideas of what constitutes an ideal relationship?

I`m betting that you do.
0
Reply
Male 311
(who is she talking to?) O.o
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Yes you do hate women if you expect for them to be willing to give you oral sex without being willing to return the favor, that is correct.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
*You`re* not "your"
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah ...
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Again!

Your an idiot who does not understand the phrase I`ll scratch your back if you scratch mine. There is a fundamental understanding by scientists that in all human relationships partners weigh the cost/benefit ratio. If one puts in more and receives less then they have a negative cost/benefit ratio and are unlikely to stay in that relationship (for obvious reasons). Hence if your sexual cost/benefit ratio is negative you are unlikely to stay in that relationship or to continue fulfilling your partners needs.

Sex is a fundamental part of romantic human relationships. If one partner is not sexually satisfied then from an evolutionary perspective they have less of a reason to maintain that relationship then the person who is sexually satisfied.

What you are advocating is that unbalanced human relationships are okay, and scientifically speaking we know that this is just not true.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Oh wait- Yes I shall! Watch me try to overwhelm this message board with utter bull poo! Wow, I must be smart if I have so much to say!

P.S.

You`re an idiot and a misogynist if you think that a women doesn`t deserve to be equally sexually satisfied (orally) in a relationship.

Your an even BIGGER idiot if you think that only one person should have their sexual needs met in a relationship. Unless- your a misogynist f-ck tard like you who is threatened by a woman who wants to be sexually satisfied, calls them derogatory terms to make himself feel better, and only has a relationship with his hand.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Truthfully I do not know why I am bothering to try and reason with a semi-retarded misogynist f-ck tard like yourself.

(Shall I post another? Nah.)
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Also your examples are all completely irrelevant since in my example you are exchanging sexual satisfaction for sexual satisfaction (orally).

So it would be more like:
I`ll drink your pee, if you drink mine
etc. etc.

I hope you see the difference now, though I remain doubtful since it is clear your intelligence is somewhat lacking.

0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Angilion are your thoughts really so disorganized and incoherent that you have to spew them across four consecutive posts? Really, please do think before you start typing.

"I`d be appalled if my partner thought they had to do something sexual they didn`t want to do in order to get something from me."

I`d be appalled if your partner expected for you to preform oral sex on them but never was willing to give it. Once again, Obhwfgirl was not saying that she expected her partner to reciprocate immediately, only that she expected him to reciprocate in general. (Or eventually).

If you are not willing to do something for your partner you can hardy expect for them to be willing to do it to you. If you are not willing to sexually satisfy your partner then why should they have any interest in sexually satisfying you?

0
Reply
Male 12,365
Also, if it`s such a wonderful idea why only apply it to one thing?

How about "if you want to cuddle, you have to drink my pee."

Or "if you want me to show you any affection, you have to turn tricks for me"?

Or "if you want that promotion, you have to get under the desk and give me oral"?

It`s just reciprocation, right? Anyone who doesn`t approve of it must hate women, right?

No. It`s not right at all. It`s abuse.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Cut off as usual:

I`m also saddened that there are people like NotTHATbored who think that`s sexual equality. Although presumably only when it`s women imposing it on men.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Sorry Angillion but no. She was requiring oral sex by women (at least her anyway) on men (not sex in general) be contigent specifically on men giving it to women. Not money, not anal, not anything else.[/quote]

And?

Different people trade for different things, depending on what they want.

I`ve no problem with honestly charging for sex acts.

I`ve no problem with people consensually acting out fantasies of it.

I`ve no problem with people consensually choosing to "have" to do a sex act someone else tells them to do or with people consensually choosing other dom/sub activities within a relationship.

I do have a problem with it being patronisingly advocated as the ideal in relationships for real, not as a consensual sex game.

I`d be appalled if my partner thought they had to do something sexual they didn`t want to do in order to get something from me.

I`m also saddened that there are people like NotTHAT
0
Reply
Male 12,365
NotTHATbored:

Now I see the problem. You`re a liar and a bigot who likes to spew out the sex card because you have nothing else.

I`m not going to charge anyone I`m having sex with in any way or try to coerce them into doing any sexual activity they don`t want to do. I`ve no interest in doing the former and I think the latter is morally wrong.

You can call that misogynist if you like, but that only shows what a lowlife you are.

Do you treat women the same way? Or are you a misandrist who`s spewing out false accusations of misogyny to try to cover up her own bigotry?

Do you require the power trip of coercing a man into sex in order to be satisfied? I assure you that isn`t normal. Many women are sexually satisfied without that, with sexual activity their partners want to do.
0
Reply
Male 10,845
[quote]She was making sex contigent on something else - that is trading sex.[/quote]

Sorry Angillion but no. She was requiring oral sex by women (at least her anyway) on men (not sex in general) be contigent specifically on men giving it to women. Not money, not anal, not anything else.

[quote]You`re an idiot and a misogynist if you think that a women doesn`t deserve to be equally sexually satisfied (orally) in a relationship.
You`re an idiot and a misogynist if you think that men shouldn`t have to give back when they receive in a relationship, sexually or emotionally.[/quote]

On the other hand that right there is a hasty generalization and ad hominem rolled into one.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Braindamaged No worries, I don`t think anyone on I-A-B would have got vaccinated anyway. Unfortunately, for the most part there is an astonishing lack of intelligence on these boards ;-)
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Angilion

You`re an idiot and a misogynist if you think that a women doesn`t deserve to be equally sexually satisfied (orally) in a relationship.

You`re an idiot and a misogynist if you think that men shouldn`t have to give back when they receive in a relationship, sexually or emotionally.

People who fulfill the needs of others, deserve to have their needs met as well.

Relationships should be equal.

All take and no give makes Jack a sh-tty person.

There, I hope I`ve cleared that up for you.

All I can say is that OBVIOUSLY, a women who wants to be sexually satisfied threatens you. I think we both know what that implies, maybe you should think about it.

Anyway I`ve said my piece.

Have a good life consecutively over posting on I-A-B and ripping off other people`s posts to try and pass off as your own.

0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]@Angilion STFU. First off obhwfgirl never said she wanted to "trade sex", you did.[/quote]

She was making sex contigent on something else - that is trading sex.

Make up whatever you like - that`s what it is.

[quote]Even if she did insist on immediate reciprocation it is none of your business[/quote]

It`s a public forum. It`s anyone`s business.

[quote]Secondly stop ripping off my posts you misogynist f-ck tard.[/quote]

I am genuinely interested in what deranged leaps of nonsense led you to believe that was a reasonable comment. Do you really believe there`s any truth in it or do you just like slandering people on a whim? Or maybe you have no idea what any of the words mean?

It`s a genuine question. You spew defamatory nonsense at me for no apparent reason and pretend it has anything to do with anything I`ve written. I`d really like to know why.
0
Reply
Male 102
You`re right NotTHATbored, it was inappropriate of me to make such a flippant statement about a serious topic. Having one strain certainly wouldn`t protect you from another, so getting vaccinated is smart, but there are so many strains out there. The vaccine only covers for strains 6, 11, 16, and 18 though. Two of which cause cancer and two that don`t, so getting vaccinated doesn`t provide complete protection.

And Kouhaiji, it`s obvious that the virus causes cancer and not oral sex itself. I didn`t get the impression that the article was saying that. I think your reading comprehension skills are poor if that`s what you got out of the article.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Angilion STFU. First off obhwfgirl never said she wanted to "trade sex", you did. She said that she expected a partner to reciprocate, not that she expected him to reciprocate immediately. Even if she did insist on immediate reciprocation it is none of your business because the last time I check she wasn`t asking you to have sex with her. I honestly doubt many people do.

Secondly stop ripping off my posts you misogynist f-ck tard.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]While this is ambiguous, thankfully it`s just men giving women oral.[/quote]

No, it isn`t. The article is misleading about that too.

There may well be less risk of HPV infection going down on a man than on a woman, but that isn`t known for sure and in any case less risk isn`t no risk.

Also, quite a few people who go down on a woman are not men. Women who do so are just as likely to get infected as men who do so - HPV doesn`t care what sex you are.

HPV infection can go the other way too - from mouth to genitals.

Having said that, it`s still a very small risk. The type of throat (not really oral - the article is misleading there as well) cancer caused by a few strains of HPV is rare but oral sex is very common.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Guess what, boys. You don`t wanna give? You don`t receive.[/quote]

Guess what, girl? Trading sex is not appealing. Maybe you should be an honest prostitute and take cash instead of favours.

[quote]I can catch a lot worse from your spunk than you can from my hooch. THAT is a fact.[/quote]

I wouldn`t bet on it.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]If you`re sexually active then you probably already have HPV. The vaccine would be useless to you then. Vaccines stimulate an immune response to people without prior exposure. So if you`re <21 and not sexually active then get vaccinated.

Otherwise, what`s the point? That`s like getting a flu shot after you get the flu.[/quote]

There are over 100 different strains of HPV. Even if you probably have one or more of them, that doesn`t mean you probably have all of the strains that can cause cancer.

Besides, "probably" isn`t "definitely", so it would still be worth it anyway.
0
Reply
Female 3,001
i got the vaccine for this cancer in school :D
0
Reply
Male 684
This is another example of how reporters/writers use part of the truth to create an overall misleading picture. Used to be integrity had a place in the world, but greed and vanity have made it obsolete.
0
Reply
Male 604
"Making a statement like "correlation does not imply causation" suggests that the information in the article is false, which it clearly isn`t."

The conclusion in the article is false. This is more like "coming into contact with HPV, even if not via sexual intercourse, can cause cancer". Also, correlation between people getting more blowjobs over the last 30 years and cancer rates going up doesn`t mean that one causes the other.

Furthermore, I`ve read plenty of scientific research, being in a research university and all, and just because they`re "difficult to read" does not mean that they`re necessarily correct. Plenty of false research comes out all the time, that`s why we have peer-review and multiple studies. That`s why we need to know exactly how this was tested.

The findings that you can contract HPV from oral is true. The conclusion that oral causes cancer is false. HPV causes cancer, not oral.
0
Reply
Male 13
Might as well just say, being alive causes cancer. There done, no need for any more medical studies as living is responsible for all cancer. Best solution is death. Sorted.
0
Reply
Male 2,579
So... This means I can feel good about being a horribly lonely sexless internet geek?
0
Reply
Male 1,540
While this is ambiguous, thankfully it`s just men giving women oral. Men can rest easy knowing they`re not shooting loads of cancer in to the mouths of women everywhere. Last I remember drinking semen was healthy for women if I`m not mistaken.
0
Reply
Male 106
Awesome... like women needed another reason. I`ll miss the days when I could say "hey, it`s protein. good for you, right?"...

...right?

...drating cancer.
0
Reply
Male 185
it`s not the sex, it`s the virus. get vaccinated. drat the women only feminazis.
0
Reply
Female 631
everything causes cancer?
0
Reply
Female 582
So the cancer rates are higher than from tobacco? Probably because everyone realized it`s nasty to chew.

Guess what, boys. You don`t wanna give? You don`t receive. I can catch a lot worse from your spunk than you can from my hooch. THAT is a fact.
0
Reply
Male 1,226
"The more oral-sex partners a man had".

Does that mean as long as you`re with one partner there`s a one time increase in risk?
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@braindamaged

"If you`re sexually active then you probably already have HPV. The vaccine would be useless to you then. Vaccines stimulate an immune response to people without prior exposure. So if you`re <21 and not sexually active then get vaccinated."

NO, THAT IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE! EVEN IF YOU HAVE BEEN SEXUALLY ACTIVE YOU SHOULD STILL GET VACCINATED!! While chances are good that you have been exposed to one strain of HPV that is known to cause cancer, chances are also good that you have not been exposed to all of them! Just because you are infected with one strain of cancer causing HPV does not mean you want to catch two or three! Get all three shots people, don`t be idiots, and when in doubt use protection!!!
0
Reply
Male 102
It`s a good article. Even if the science were provided, the reader would be lost without a strong background in biochemistry, microbiology, and histology. It would take hours of reading to even get a basic understanding of the science. There are hundreds of relevant journal articles and textbooks written on the subject and if you`re interested in learning about it, the information is easily accessible.

Making a statement like "correlation does not imply causation" suggests that the information in the article is false, which it clearly isn`t.
0
Reply
Male 734
What doesn`t give cancer?
0
Reply
Male 515
in a pathetic defense, I`m only commenting on the lack of info supplied by the article. It would have be nice to have some science, not 50 words about how you should avoid oral, and teach it in schools.
With no real data you can make the "Correlation does not imply causation" arguement.
0
Reply
Male 773
`Mennonites don`t have toasters and i haven`t heard of any of them having cancer`

No, HUTTERITES don`t have toasters, but yes, mennonites dont generally get cancer. They die of inbreeding.
`if we break up, are we still cousins?`

It`s true. Used to live inn a town that had a 95% menno population. Nightmare, it was.

But, being one of the few young guys who wasnt part of the gene pool, and was `vetlich` (worldly), got me alotta pussay. It wasnt pretty though..
0
Reply
Male 70
Being as 3 of 4 Americans under the age of 49 will have contracted at least one strain of HPV at least once, chances are every single blow-job could be your last. Here`s a hint, ladies: past sexual history COUNTS. If he`s EVER admitted to NOT using a condom, you`re taking a risk. (And this is coming from a dentist. For the love of god, please get vaccinated and PLEASE practice safe sex! Thank you.)
0
Reply
Female 2,120
Someone get me a pic of Darth Vader "NOOOOOO!"-ing right now.

I need to feel better immediately.
0
Reply
Male 257
oh well sorry girls
0
Reply
Male 102
"Correlation does not imply causation."

Although this statement is true, it has nothing to do with the link between HPV and cancer.

The pathophysiology of this disease is clearly understood and the scientific evidence of HPV causing squamous cell dysplasia which leads to cancer is much stronger than mere correlation.

You obviously know absolutely nothing about the subject.
0
Reply
Male 5,190
NOOOO!!!!
0
Reply
Male 260
Of all the ways to get cancer, this is the best.
0
Reply
Male 5,413
What the...
0
Reply
Male 604
Correlation does not imply causation.
0
Reply
Male 102
If you`re sexually active then you probably already have HPV. The vaccine would be useless to you then. Vaccines stimulate an immune response to people without prior exposure. So if you`re <21 and not sexually active then get vaccinated.

Otherwise, what`s the point? That`s like getting a flu shot after you get the flu.
0
Reply
Male 379
man, i hope the wife doesn`t get on here and read this.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Web MD facts on HPV and its link to throat cancer: HPV & Throat Cancer
0
Reply
Female 1,101
This is actually true. The HPV virus which also can cause certain types of cervical cancer has been linked the throat cancer.

BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT THERE ARE VACCINES AGAINST THE VIRUS! GET YOUR VACCINES I-A-B AND ENJOY YOUR ORAL SEX SAFELY :-)
0
Reply
Male 515
where are the facts about this?
Mennonites don`t have toasters and i haven`t heard of any of them having cancer
0
Reply
Male 102
Oral pap smears for everyone! :D

Could you imagine a cone biopsy or LEEP in your mouth!? Jesus Christ that would hurt. Google it and I bet you won`t be saying, "hur dur I`ll take my chances."

Hmmm... I wonder if that would become part of a standard dental visit. That would suck. As if going to the dentist wasn`t already painful enough.
0
Reply
Female 262
trollers gotta troll...
0
Reply
Male 12,365
FemBot:

There`s a *causal* link proven - some strains of HPV can turn some human cells cancerous. It`s not just a vague grabbing at an irrelevant correlation.
0
Reply
Female 262
Okay there`s lots of cancer nowadays, and recently people have more sex then usual... eureka! Sex must cause cancer! Now, off to prove the correlation between Nazis and liberals!
0
Reply
Male 243
So ... Does Gerry have HPV in the mouth yet? It`s most common in white men soo...
0
Reply
Male 37,888

I`ll risk it
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Lmfo, nerd, virgin, lifeless scientist must back up this research
0
Reply
Male 1,598
what doesn`t cause cancer?!
0
Reply
Male 2,345
someone just fing shoot me know...seriously when oral sex gives you cancer there is NO POINT in living anymore.
0
Reply
Male 1,793
Don`t care, don`t care.....
0
Reply
Male 2,402
Here I`ll put it bluntly.

I would rather go out with cancer knowing my wife thinks of me as a stud lover. Rather then die of old age as a retarded lousy lover.
0
Reply
Female 2,027
fake
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]They really need to make a gaurdisil vaccine for guys, not just girls.. I think they might but it`s harder to come by or something.[/quote]

The same vaccine works for people of both sexes. It`s just a matter of paying for it - it`s not currently considered worth the cost to vaccinate male people against HPV. Almost all the research and treatment resources have been focussed solely on female people. That might not be only due to sexism - until recently people were only looking at genital and anal cancers connected with HPV and by far the most common one of those is cervical cancer.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Don`t go down on people with genital warts. I could have drating told you that.[/quote]

There are many strains of HPV, most of which don`t cause warts. The strains that can cause cancer aren`t the ones that can cause warts (and a person could be infected with one of the wart-causing strains and not have warts).

So your advice wouldn`t help in this context.

[quote]Men can get HPV as well, and if this only applies to going down on someone with HPV, then perhaps people should stop going down on people with HPV[/quote]

Most people with HPV have no symptoms, so how could you tell?

That`s the bottom line - you can`t tell without a test.
0
Reply
Male 4
Smoke cigarettees, not pole!
0
Reply
Male 2,220
Its a risk, reward thing.

I`ll take the risk. She gets the reward


0
Reply
Male 2,220
Well you could try this...



but then...


0
Reply
Male 5,314
research shows that 10 out of 10 people die.
0
Reply
Female 240
They really need to make a gaurdisil vaccine for guys, not just girls.. I think they might but it`s harder to come by or something.
0
Reply
Male 770
hey;
I looked it up. Did you know that 100%, Thats 100% all, every single one! 100% of the people born in the year 1863 that ate carrots HAS DIED!!!!!!!
0
Reply
Male 612
"... God I hate news with their eye-catching headlines that aren`t actually correct."

well then you must hate like 87% of every IAB post...
0
Reply
Male 2,402
Hmm...I would like to see the resources listed for such. I just don`t mean the two names given either. But actual where to find the data. It`s to vague. Second the say it`s high among men, but what about among lesbians? We should see a high rate of increase among that group.
0
Reply
Male 2,332
"I`ll take my chances ;)"

What he said.
0
Reply
Male 29
NOOOOOOOOO!
0
Reply
Male 3,576
A new study has proven that research causes cancer in libratory animals
0
Reply
Male 493
Total bullpoo. They just need an excuse to shove more drugs into people.
0
Reply
Male 176
OH, so it`s not the act of Oral Sex, it`s just that you might catch a nasty disease... God I hate news with their eye-catching headlines that aren`t actually correct.
0
Reply
Male 1,627
wasnt there a report not too long ago saying it was good for your health?
0
Reply
Male 10,845
[quote]Researchers found a 225% increase in oral cancer cases in the U.S. from 1974 to 2007, mainly among white men[/quote]

Hmmm I have questions about this sample.
0
Reply
Male 2,085
I am calling BS on this one.
0
Reply
Male 1,010
So we started singin` "bye bye, miss American Pie.."
0
Reply
Male 174
Hm. Well, even if this is true I`m not about to stop giving my girlfriend the deed. Call me crazy, but I`m not going to start being all paranoid about one of my favorite things in life
0
Reply
Male 474
Men can get HPV as well, and if this only applies to going down on someone with HPV, then perhaps people should stop going down on people with HPV...or people who use those vaccines that were listed...
0
Reply
Female 3,598
*Title Correction*
Oral Sex Now Leading Cause of Increased Orgasms
there. fixed it.
0
Reply
Male 2,516
where`s davymid with the bullpoo sign?

PS. Ew, oral sex... gross. They pee from there
0
Reply
Male 16
whatevs...
0
Reply
Male 975
And wait what? I shouldn`t be going down anymore? How drating lame.
0
Reply
Male 975
I see what you did there Ghostofme
0
Reply
Female 4,039
Whoa, whoa, whoa - so this only applies to men performing oral sex on women, not women performing oral sex on men? I demand to know who`s behind this!
0
Reply
Male 1,107
Lies!
0
Reply
Female 751
only if your partner doesn`t wrap their $h!t.

HPV is detectable.
0
Reply
Male 582
us white boys loves to go south with the mouth
0
Reply
Female 1,589
Maybe this will encourage women to get their HPV shot now. It`s either that, or a lot less orgasms.
0
Reply
Male 490
"The more oral-sex partners a man had, the greater his cancer risk..." Well no poo! I mean, I thought it was common sense that the more people you have sex with the higher your chances are of getting an std!
0
Reply
Female 386
Well that makes me few loads worst about the day I had yesterday.....
0
Reply
Male 953
I`ll take my chances ;)
0
Reply
Male 658
Actually, if we could stop drating them, entirely, that would be nice.
0
Reply
Male 658
Don`t go down on people with genital warts. I could have drating told you that.
0
Reply
Male 28
This is truly a sad day for mankind.
0
Reply
Male 54
Bullpoo.
0
Reply
Male 153
Link: Oral Sex Now Leading Cause Of Increased Cancer [Rate Link] - Stupid science ruining life one thing at a time.
0
Reply