The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 67    Average: 2.9/5]
176 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 20376
Rating: 2.9
Category: Funny
Date: 03/26/11 01:02 PM

176 Responses to Libya Vs. Iraq: So True

  1. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:50 am
    Link: Libya Vs. Iraq: So True - Just a couple of co-workers comparing Libya and Iraq.
  2. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:14 pm
    Right wing crap. I stopped listening after 35 seconds.
  3. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:14 pm
    Hey davy, did you foresee who posted this? Cause` I did :-D
  4. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:15 pm
    No matter who becomes President they all compromise to the Military Industrial System. War makes money off the taxpayers for the eltists. F*** them all!
  5. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:16 pm
    Anyway, I distinctly remember the Lybians asking for help. That alone is enough to dismiss most of this video.
  6. Profile photo of alk3v
    alk3v Male 18-29
    340 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:16 pm
    Agree here. The comparisons and similarities are staggering. The problem is that most people thought that Iraq`s invasion was motivated by the war on Terror/9-11 (which it was not). Just like Libya it was a war to deal with an oppressive regime murdering its own citizens. In Iraq`s case there just happened to be faulty intelligence regarding WMDs and the war was fundamentally mismanaged. Personally I feel that both wars are equally (un)justified (the USA is not the world police and the UN should be taking care of this). We`ll have to see how Libya pans out to truly compare the two though.
    One thing for certain: If you applaud Obama for Libya yet bash Bush for Iraq you need to look at your reasoning.
  7. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:18 pm
    1 Situation in libya is under controll of NATO, when Bush attack Iraq he attack alone without any UN agreement.

    2 Untill today we don`t have any notice about civilians death caused by Nato raids. Nato raids are against anti air postations.

    3 This NATO resolution don`t say at all we must kill Gheddafi. Bush have killed Saddam.

    4 All countries involved in NATO resoultion clearly say that they have also oil interest. Bush have never admit that he was doing a war for oil, he allways have used incredibles lies and unbelivables reasons.

    5 Obama is not creating a climax of religious hate like Bush have done for more than 10 years.
  8. Profile photo of OutWest
    OutWest Male 50-59
    546 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:25 pm
    LOL... Cats you are on a roll. "Just like Morgan Freeman".... "Oh God" smacks forehead.
  9. Profile photo of krisley
    krisley Male 18-29
    525 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:29 pm
    2 problems with this that I see, the rest makes a pretty good point:

    1. Bush golfed during the Iraq war. All of that, "Obama has too much free-time apparently" drivel is getting pretty old.

    2. FOX News is comedic via it`s hypocrisy, and Stewart and Colbert are comedic by pointing out FOX News` hypocrisy. That anybody thinks either is a legitimate source of news is quite scary.
  10. Profile photo of chimmeychang
    chimmeychang Male 30-39
    685 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:29 pm
    HAHAHAHA, Of course both wars are about oil. Iraq was actually exporting lots of oil to Europe as well(for food)at least that is my understanding. It is my understanding that there was poor intelligence handling in the case of Bush. It is no coincidence that the first legal document signed by the new Iraqi government was an oil deal. The human rights violation that Iraq committed was enough to start a war on alone IMO. My big problem with the situation is that the American people paid to "liberate" the oil, and now the oil companies that are benefiting from it are also charging us extra for the "protection" our government is providing...We fight for the oil, they take it, then charge us enough to report record profits...I think the oil companies benefiting from the situation should be helping pay for the oil, of course they may be, I really don`t know, I haven`t done enough research on the subject to say definitely, but that`s
    sure what it seems like.
  11. Profile photo of Blargley
    Blargley Male 18-29
    2 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:35 pm
    @piperfawn: Your reasoning is as bad as your grammar and spelling. Did you even watch the video?? I mean we attacked Iraq with the UN! The reason we invaded was because the UN told Hussein that they would invade unless he let us check for WMD`s, and when he didn`t, we invaded. Not to mention that Bush didn`t kill Hussein and that the Iraqis did. I hope you were joking with that post.
  12. Profile photo of KeePay
    KeePay Male 18-29
    494 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:37 pm
    Does everyone use Xtranormal to create strawman arguments or what?
  13. Profile photo of Pravda7
    Pravda7 Female 18-29
    290 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:37 pm
    Libia has the richest supplies of oil in Africa and 9th largest in the world. The conflicts throughout Africa: Angola, Congo, Sudan, Somalia, Sierra Leon, and MANY more... the UN and the Western World does absolutely nothing. Than, there is Libya and all of the sudden the UN can not wait to get involved ... the show must go on.
  14. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:38 pm
    @LazyMe484

    What faction of the rebels asked for our help? CFR

    I distinctly recall the Iraq people asking many times for our help to oust Saddam.

    What 5 Cats posted is a true reflection of how inept and blind people are to their prejudicial ideas of what is right and wrong.
  15. Profile photo of johnkelley
    johnkelley Male 18-29
    59 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 1:48 pm
    I think you are all forgetting that the left was pissed at how long it took Bush to go to war. Cobert and Stewart are dumbass "comedians" who are so left wing that you idiots eat up everything they say as news, when they are far from it. Obama golfed more in his first year of office than Bush did his whole two terms. Obama is not around, when there are many things, like a budget, war with Libya and many more things needing attention right now. Piper, you are sick in your head, you don`t even realize that Bush didn`t call for Saddam`s death, we captured him, he went ON TRIAL and received the death penalty. You libtards need help.
  16. Profile photo of urbanlegend
    urbanlegend Male 18-29
    741 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:05 pm
    This video is fail.

    No one jumped into a war. Are there ground troops in Libya? No.
  17. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    @Blargley Prior to the invasion, the governments of the United States and the United Kingdom asserted that the possibility of Iraq employing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) threatened their security and that of their coalition/regional allies. In 2002, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1441 which called for Iraq to completely cooperate with UN weapon inspectors to verify that it was not in possession of weapons of mass destruction and cruise missiles. The United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) was given access by Iraq under provisions of the UN resolution but found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction.
    So you are a liar like your old president Bush. You start war only with British and not with UN.
  18. Profile photo of last1in
    last1in Male 18-29
    260 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:07 pm
    Wow, this completely change my feelings on the war in Iraq. Still, in both cases, we couldn`t have done nothing w/o taking flack for it, and we couldn`t have done anything that w/o taking flack for it. Until we are put in the position our presidents were put in, we really can`t bash either of them for decisions made.
  19. Profile photo of urbanlegend
    urbanlegend Male 18-29
    741 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:07 pm
    johnkelley is obviously a pathetic, mad, conservative troll who, even presented with the facts, wants to believe (pretend?) as if he`s correct and justified. Go to hell buddy YOU`RE the type that`s ruining America.
  20. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:17 pm
    @Blargley (continue)According to U.S. President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the reasons for the invasion were "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein`s alleged support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people." According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq`s failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace. In 2005, the Central Intelligence Agency released a report saying that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq.
  21. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:22 pm
    The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some traditional U.S. allies, including the governments of France, Germany, New Zealand, and Canada (nations inside UN if you don`t know my dear Blargley). Their leaders argued that there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that invading the country was not justified in the context of UNMOVIC`s February 12, 2003 report.
  22. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:31 pm
    There were serious legal questions surrounding the launching of the war against Iraq and the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war in general. On September 16, 2004, Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, said of the invasion, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the Charter point of view, it was illegal."
  23. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:39 pm
    According to the Center for Public Integrity, the Bush administration allegedly made a total of 935 false statements between 2001 and 2003 about Iraq`s alleged threat to the United States. Is it clear now Blargley or you want to keep standing in your fakes dreams?
  24. Profile photo of nnotdead
    nnotdead Male 18-29
    139 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:39 pm
    i`ll just say no because the majority of left leaning people and talking heads haven`t been very supportive. a lot seem to point out that there are a bunch of bad/evil leaders in the world, so why are we not attacking them? not saying we should, just pointing the fallacy`s of American foreign policy.
  25. Profile photo of Intaresting
    Intaresting Male 18-29
    812 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:44 pm
    The major difference is that the libyans themselves desired the intervention of the UN. Invading Iraq was useless and uncalled for, and the citizens paid for it the most.

    And besides, Gaddafi is a lunatic.
  26. Profile photo of MildCorma
    MildCorma Male 18-29
    496 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:45 pm
    I think quite a few people are forgetting something here, let me elaborate.

    You are the leader of a great nation. One morning an aide gives you evidence that one of the most dangerous dictators in the world (that has used wmds on his own people in the past in the form of nerve gas) in a country with the 4th biggest army in the world, might have weapons of mass destruction. What do you do?

    I wouldn`t sit on my arse and wait to see what happened that`s for sure. I am in no doubt that saddam was a nasty SOAB and needed to be removed. To calrify, there was -COMPLETE- justification for an invasion, complete justification. Even if that intelligence was false it is still intelligence and you have to go by it. If i`m a leader and I see that then I will ofc say "lets go invade". What happened afterwards is fuzzy, but the invasion 100% justified.
  27. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 2:53 pm
    @Buiadh: Enlighten me on what facts were wrong. You sound exactly like the girl in the video (afraid of logic)
  28. Profile photo of shappy
    shappy Male 18-29
    757 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 3:11 pm
    the main difference is that the libyan rebels actually want the help
  29. Profile photo of TopperHey
    TopperHey Male 18-29
    1930 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 3:21 pm
    Stopped it after a minute. It`s on about some random poo about the USA going to war with Libya or something. What has this got to do with anything?
  30. Profile photo of TheShgn2
    TheShgn2 Male 13-17
    626 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 3:33 pm
    Didn`t pretty much the rulers of Bahrain do the exact same thing to their people but no one interfered because their rulers keep the oil flowing?
  31. Profile photo of Qystein
    Qystein Male 18-29
    159 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 4:01 pm
    its not the US who attacks Libya, its the UN!
    If this war were to control oil flow to Europe, then why would Norway join in?
  32. Profile photo of zeebeedee
    zeebeedee Male 50-59
    614 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    @piperfawn so you`re from Europe huh?
  33. Profile photo of Slmmhmmr161
    Slmmhmmr161 Male 18-29
    606 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 4:25 pm
    Iraq = Not UN Sanctioned.

    Libya = UN/NATO Sanctioned.

    Problem Solved.
  34. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 4:27 pm
    This is what we and Europe are going to get. just another headache from the Arab world.

    Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html

    We are just trading for another oppressive regime that will be just as rotten as the Taliban. They have had 5000 years in the Arab world to get their sh*t together. They cannot and we need to learn to stay the freak out of other countries affairs. Let them wage their holy Jihads on themselves.

    I`m sick of the USA spending money we don`t have on my tax dollar. Paying for these fat cats Military Industrialists weapons. The tax money ca
  35. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 4:27 pm
    continued....
    The tax money can be better spent on security at home and paying off the debt so my dollar has more buying power.
  36. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 4:32 pm
    i thought this was gonna make some valid points or something... this is just a leftwinger and a rightwinger going at it.
  37. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 5:49 pm
    @zeebeedee Yes i`m from EU why?
  38. Profile photo of yoda141
    yoda141 Male 18-29
    266 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 5:49 pm
    Democrats and republicans.. dirty bastard. A mind that votes democrat is a good rebel mind wasted.
  39. Profile photo of tsiemens
    tsiemens Male 30-39
    515 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:04 pm
    The US dollar will always lose buying power because its based on a fractional reserve system and all money is issued as debt by the federal reserve, that is to say that every dollar in existence is owed back to the fed plus INTEREST. That means there is more money owing than actually exists. Do some research, the end of the line will come eventually, everyone will be broke except the banksters, just the way they want it.
  40. Profile photo of BetterBob
    BetterBob Male 18-29
    168 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:10 pm
    I had almost this exact conversation with one of my coworkers. including the facepalm at the end.
  41. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:19 pm
    What 5 Cats posted is a true reflection of how inept and blind people are to their prejudicial ideas of what is right and wrong.
    Why Thanks! @handys003 gets it! As do several others.
    The "peace movement" was on the streets BEFORE the Gulf War II even started, yet for Obama? They are no where to be found! Similar thing happened under Clinton, which the video mentions.
    It`s truely pathetic how the MSM, the liberal left and the "peace" people are 100% hypocrites! (stangely, Code Pink actually protested a little about using lots of drones in Afghanistan, they have more integrity than the MSM? oy vey!)
  42. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:28 pm
    vv @Piperfawn conveniently forgets that Saddam threatened the lives of the weapons inspectors, forcing them to flee the country. For 2 years he refused to let them back in. He had plenty of time to move his weapons to Syria, and there`s ample evidence he did just that. Israel blew them up a couple of years ago btw, in Syria.
    The Ceaase Fire Agreement (which stopped the first Gulf War, not Bush Sr) required Saddam to guarentee the safety and free access to the weapons inspectors. Since Saddam violated that, and many other parts of the CFA, the UN said `game on!` for the second Gulf War.

    Kofi Annan, and his son, made millions in `kickbacks` from Iraq and her allies.

    vv @MildCorma has it right too! SOME of the reasons for invasion didn`t pan out, but there were plenty of reasons that did! Unlike Clinton`s invasion of Serbia, where the UN found ZERO evidence of the alleged atrocities.
  43. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2345 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:31 pm
    there was nothing wrong with taking saddam out, the problem came when he kept our troops there.

    The other MAIN difference, if that the Libyian people are figting for their own freedom while the Iraqis were too chickenpoo to even attempt it...

    If the Libyians were not fighting for their freedom then this would be a stupid offensive. However, they ARE, and without aid they will be slaughtered by a madman.

    there is no room in this world for dictators that kill their own people anymore.

    Also, OIL is a pretty damn good reason to go to war...think it isn`t?

    EVERYTHING that makes life possible in this world is made from hydrocarbons...you know OIL.

    it is not just used for gas, but for PLASTIC, food, fuel, energy, etc.

    do we really want the last remaining amounts of it to be in the hands of a bat poo crazy dictator?

    Bush was an idiot and he approached the issue of Iraq completely wrong. This is not a black and white iss
  44. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2345 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:35 pm
    if you think oil isn`t a really good reason to go to war...you are a true moron.

    everything that makes life possible as we know it relies on HYDROCARBONS AKA OIL.

    food, fuel, plastics, medical equipment, energy, transportation, EVERYTHING is based on a fossil fuel system that allows us to build and run everything we have.

    next time you are stupid enough to think that oil isn`t a valid reason to go to war try living without the products created by it...which is EVERYTHING.

    oh but don;t worry my little morons, in about 40 years when there isn`t enough of it left you will find out exactly what the world looks like without it.

  45. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36665 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:35 pm

    They`re not the same situations at all.

    But I still think military activity in Iraq OR Lybia are both stupid.

    I`m no pacifist, but there`s no point to either.
  46. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:53 pm
    5Cats i`ve just reported facts that are proved and are allready in history. All the tings you say don`t move my clear idea that war in Iraq was done against UN resolutions.Libya intervention(not war cause NATO have`nt send a single soldier on the soil of Libya)come after a specific resolution of UN and NATO and after a UN and NATO decision to create a no fly zone. All what you say about fantapolitic and about Syria and Israel fables is pure elucubration, not a single UN/Nato official document talk about that. Maybe some entertaining George Clooney and so on movie, but remember history is done by FACTS not by opinions.
  47. Profile photo of hi2pi
    hi2pi Male 30-39
    736 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 6:57 pm
    One was done for conquest, the other to protect civilians. Anyone that thinks the two are the same are about as dumb as...oh, hold on, this is a country that voted to W twice, so no surprises, I s`pose.
  48. Profile photo of ggolbez
    ggolbez Male 18-29
    1933 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 7:04 pm
    Got to 1:25 and stopped. I realize the point and support it. It is drated up what the Obama administration is doing to Libya, and it is a good comparison of the two. Hell, at least Bush tried to convince America first before invading Iraq.

    But we haven`t really "invaded" yet. We`ve just bombed a bit. I don`t support it, especially considering that there are a ton of other countries over there needing the same thing.
  49. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 7:19 pm
    vv That`s true @Gerry1of1, there are a LOT of differences in the 3 wars. Also a lot of similarities, they`re complex issues!

    What isn`t complex is the sheer hatred directed at GW Bush by the MSM, and at America`s troops too, over the first two wars. Now the MSM bends over backwards to proclaim how great this 3rd war is? Sickening.

    And leftards gulp the kool-aid down and ask for seconds.

    @PiperFawn: No Fly Zone = War. The troops will be there sooner or later, Britian, Italy and France want their oil!

    I eagerly await the "peace protestors" first rally...
  50. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 7:30 pm
    Once again 5CATS yours are just opinions, for now the FACTS are clear,not a single NATO soldier is in Libya soil. Maybe you have a cristal ball to see the future... i prefere to judge the facts. We will see. For sure EU countries have interests in oil( you can`t pretend that only USA have the right on spreading wars all over the world for oil) but not a single european country is hiding this desire. At least we don`t say bulls.hits to the rest of the world and we don`t use fakes excuses about weapons of mass destruction.
  51. Profile photo of tn11
    tn11 Male 18-29
    1587 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 7:41 pm
    piperfawn- by the logic that if there are no soldiers on the ground, it can`t be a war, then if the US sent some ICBM`s at Russia and they fired back, there would be no war. 0_o It sure as heck would feel like war.

    I found this very interesting. I don`t think either President has made the best and most correct decisions, but there is a lot of hate for GB. Interestingly, I don`t think there are too many people like the blondie around anymore. Obama has lost a lot of popular support.
  52. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 7:59 pm
    tn11 Soldiers on soil are sended to conquer territory, you can`t conquer any territory from the air. In Libya NATO is not perpetuating an invasion, is just helping rebels that are killed by Gheddafi`s air strikes.The real war is between rebels and Gheddafi. Who is conquering territory are libyans people not NATO soldiers. USA in the second gulf war have sended tons and tons of soldiers and the first places occupied was oil sites in Iraq country. The "war" is against the dictator and his army not against an entire population or category like muslim.The second gulf war have introduced in the minds of world population the concept of war between two factions, occident against muslims. Today in Libya world is fighting for people, is not an ideological war.
  53. Profile photo of spyrocheeks
    spyrocheeks Female 13-17
    112 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 8:35 pm
    Why is it that whenever theres something based on politics all the coments are long!!!Y u no make laughs?
  54. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 8:46 pm
    spyrocheeks leave us our stupids discussions moment please i promise that after we will returns to our nature of "i don`t care all i want is fun" people.
  55. Profile photo of MildCorma
    MildCorma Male 18-29
    496 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 8:56 pm
    @tn11

    Obama has only lost support because people are fickle, forget easily and don`t want to make the hard choices that are ultimately for the best. He is like a parent taking away an obese childs candy after it asked for help. It sucks, sure, but it makes -sense-. What dumb people see is Obama voted in,, their taxes go up and things cost more so Obama = bad person. Not a sensible view, and we have the same situation in England with the coalition. They are doing the right thing to get the economy going, but people are annoyed because it`s hitting them hard after years and years of Labour going "lol spend more it`s ok". Most people (including a lot of you IABers from what i`ve seen) can`t get this separation, you only see what you want to see instead of the big picutre. Sometimes, like a parent with a child, you have to be mean to be kind. Making our countries better is neither easy nor an overnight thing.
  56. Profile photo of MildCorma
    MildCorma Male 18-29
    496 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    As for Libya well... It`s UN sanctioned, but that won`t stop people going "it`s for oil!" when really if you cared that much you would cycle / walk to work and spend the money on renewable energy so things like this -dont- happen. It`s people that go "OMG our government is so terrible, going to war for oil" whilst talking on your plastic phone next to a plastic car you fill with petrol, on your way to buy an oil tank refill for your apartment or whatever. You wonder why this happens and act in disgust when really they are most likely finding horrible ways to full-fill supply and demand.

    If you didn`t use the oil, then they would have to diverse into things you -do- spend on in order to keep making money. This is what people need to do in order to prevent the global crisis from worsening and to stop things like countries making excuses to go get some oil direct from the source (NOT that I am saying this happens, I really don`t know, i mean, who does?)
  57. Profile photo of DShephard
    DShephard Male 18-29
    1595 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 9:12 pm
    I know he inherited a *ton* of problems, but Obama is an overall failure.
    If he spends half the time leading the country as he did spend time on vacation half of our problems would have a MUCH greater chance of being foreseen and possibly avoided.
    Before someone points it out, I know that the presidents powers are limited and they cannot "lead the country" but saying "governing any or all Military actions and the majority of the Executive Branch" is a bit of a mouthful.
  58. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 9:49 pm
    "The president does not have power under the constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping of an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama Dec 20th, 2007
  59. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 9:50 pm
    LazyMe: Me too!

    As I said before, Libya is everything Bush pretended Iraq was.

    This video is still pretending on the side of Iraq. The idea that "we didn`t go in for WMDs" is horsecock they came up with *after the invasion*.

    The Libyan people wanted the help. The Arab league even wanted the help. The UN wanted the help. NATO wanted the help.

    The same can not be said of Iraq.

    Question:
    Before Obama said a thing, Why did the whole world want intervention?
    Why, even after Bush`s pleading with everyone, did the world not back his decision?

    It`s not the implied fanboyism. These decisions were made independently of those leaders. That`s because there is a clear difference between the two countries, that isn`t being seen by the people still with a deathgrip on those old Bush lies.
  60. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 10:02 pm
    Also, still on the vacation bullpoo?

    Bush: 879 days of vacation. Seriously unless you were frothing at the mouth outraged 3 years ago, grabbing guns petitioning congressmen, and most importantly raving in all the forums about it, you shut the drat up about Barack taking 12% of that.

    I`ve already adjusted for time in office btw.
  61. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 10:07 pm
    What faction of the rebels asked for our help?
    I`m gonna say most of them, otherwise they wouldn`t be so passionately fighting their "government".

    I agree with gerry. No real point to either war, however I am not against this stance of "we will *assist* any country that is rebelling against it`s despotic regime with the consent of its population and the UN".

    It seems like a f*cking big step from that to an invasion without anyone`s consent on the basis of a lie with no plan to pull out afterward.

    The oil is a coincidental strategic capture in either case. This is the ME we`re talking about, everyone has oil.

    Therefore this video is complete crap. I fear it was posted to try and spread a heavily flawed political opinion and not so much about the "boredom killing".

    Beware IAB. I`ve seen this before. You`ll want to screen your posts more carefully to make sure there is something of value in th
  62. Profile photo of DrProfessor
    DrProfessor Male 18-29
    3894 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 10:55 pm
    Differences:
    -There is rebel action currently going on in Libya (meaning that Gaddafi is using his military against civilians)
    -Libya was declared a no-fly zone by not just America, but a large group of nations. Airstrikes are being undertaken by both American and European forces.
    -There are no boots on the ground, no troop commitment.
    -It`s called Operation Odyssey Dawn (which, although meaningless, sounds awesome.)

    If anything, I would say this is much closer to the Gulf War--an international response to a dictator harming the innocent.
  63. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:02 pm
    Honestly after reading the comments. IAB just all proves 5 Cats video. It`s a mirror image.
  64. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:06 pm
    @DrProfesor replied:
    -There are no boots on the ground, no troop commitment.

    There will be shortly. A whole Marine amphibious assault force including a carrier left Pearl Harbor yesterday for Libya.
  65. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:19 pm
    handys003 You give us fresh news really interesting. If really USA is sending ground troops in Libya this mean that your government once again is going against international decisions. For now the NATO decision is to use air raids just to preserve the no fly zone,no ground troops are involved in this decision. But we all know how heavy is the USA part in NATO. The smell of oil is allways so strong. I agree with the UN decision as it is now but i will have lot of doubts if grounds troops will be deployed. I also really don`t know if Libyans people will accept that. In my opinion this will be a great mistake.
  66. Profile photo of OutWest
    OutWest Male 50-59
    546 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:21 pm
    If there are planes dropping bombs, and missiles on target, there are troops on the ground. They may not be in uniform, but they are there.

    Who do you think targets so that we do the least damage to innocents or civilians?

  67. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:38 pm
    @Out West
    Very true. The special forces teams have to be there directing laser guided weapons onto targets.

    I`m sure French Foreign Legion forces are there also since they are nearby.
  68. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:39 pm
    @piperfawn

    When your on a small island the coconut telegraph tells the reporters who tell the public. 5000 hungry Marines and a carrier affect local restaurant businesses that service Pearl Harbor. You tend to notice such wery easily.

    Yes I agree with your assertion of it to be a mistake. Fact is Marines go where called to go no questions asked. It`s part of the Rapid-Deployment-Force strategy developed in the late 80`s. Fact is even the Officers in Charge were taken aback. The Commander of US Forces Pacific was preparing to step down next month for a change in Command. On the news interview the Officers did not know what the objective was to be. They were told they will be informed on the way. A rush job so to speak. Indeed not good at all IMO.
  69. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 26, 2011 at 11:44 pm
    Hmm well ok special forces used to designate targets in my opinion are not to consider like "ground troops" they are just a part of missile sistem and they don`t affect the civilians life. When i say ground troops i mean the troops that occupy territory ,that in most of cases take controls of cities or strategical places and establishing martials rules influence the life of civilians. For now the UN resolution don`t have this option. I just hope this will remain as it is.
  70. Profile photo of phoneybone
    phoneybone Male 18-29
    1744 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 12:32 am
    i can never make it past around 1:15 with these extra normal toons
  71. Profile photo of phoneybone
    phoneybone Male 18-29
    1744 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 12:33 am
    oh and
    YAAAY WAR!
  72. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 1:22 am
    Baal: Please describe to me how Libya is an imminent or actual threat to the USA ?

    You can`t, Because it isn`t.

    Obama said he would sit down and negotiate with any nation before he would resort to military action.

    He seemed to only back sanctions until those oil pipelines were bombed, Then he instantly became a hawk. He still hasn`t asked congress for authorization, He hasn`t defined a goal (He`s flip flop on regime change) and hasn`t even talked with the rebels.

    THIS WAR IS ABOUT OIL, Iraq wasn`t, Plain and simple.

    At least have the common sense to recognize his hypocrisy and true motives.

    Btw, I`m not bothered that this war is about oil, that`s fine with me, but at the very least it needs to be recognized as such.
  73. Profile photo of rbt_food
    rbt_food Male 18-29
    322 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:09 am
    god i miss Bush. W, please come back.
  74. Profile photo of Listypoos
    Listypoos Male 40-49
    3069 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:15 am
    Agreed Ggolbez.

    We have a situation in the UK where half a million peaceful protesters took to the streets of London yesterday to protest about the severity of public sector cuts......there were around 200 violent protesters that caused damage and trouble.

    This morning the papers are screaming about how the violence completely overshadowed the protest march.

    Really? a couple of hundred people smashing bank windows completely overshadows half a million people getting off their backsides to complain to the government?

    Our government won`t listen to the demands of protesters...even half a million of them, whether they be peaceful or violent. Except if they are in a country full of oil and it`s someone they don`t like in charge..... then 20 thousand violent protesters suddenly become `freedom fighters` worthy of selling arms to.


    It`s hypocrisy.... plain and simple. You really don`t think the UK/us wouldn`t kill it`s own people if they
  75. Profile photo of deeplick
    deeplick Male 18-29
    234 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 4:31 am
    This sounds like my normal conversation with democrats.

    Listen here people. The UN told Bush that Iraq had WMD. Bush did not pull it out of his ass, there is plenty of documentation that UN had great reason to believe Iraq had WMD`s. Sadam was dictator who killed thousands upon thousands of people who laid villages down under the treads of his tanks. He used chemical warfare on his own people and kill anyone who he didn`t like. He was a cruel and nasty man who supported the same people who would love to destroy American killing all of our children, elders and women without mercy. Yet you bash Bush for his decision to put a stop to all of the above.

    Yet you praise Obama who did the same exact thing? You are all hypocrites who have no room to talk. Obama has been a worse president then Bush and I know many democrats who were pro Obama that now hate him. How freaking Ironic... The sad part is, you`re all like the chick in the video. "I don`t care." Yeah, course
  76. Profile photo of EricWRN
    EricWRN Male 30-39
    590 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 4:38 am
    wow... "libya is everything they pretended iraq was"... that`s just.... wow.... it really seems so serene just drinking the kool-aid and not having to worry about logic or principle or fact...

    Seriously, how do you even argue with someone who says "libya is everything they pretended iraq was" - you don`t
  77. Profile photo of EricWRN
    EricWRN Male 30-39
    590 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 4:43 am
    Baalthazaq is clearly either a libtroll or a head injury patient
  78. Profile photo of MildCorma
    MildCorma Male 18-29
    496 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 5:15 am
    @Listypoos

    These are the same people that wanted to vote Labour in for another term of "spending through reccession" (look how that turned out for Greece and Ireland). These are the same people that asked for help but when they saw that actually it`s going to hurt financially decided it`s no longer a good idea and the government is bad. Cuts and tax hikes = economic stability when we need it most. Saying the government is wrong to be harsh (and ultimately, we are already feeling the benefit of these choices) and crying about increases to taxation whilst at the same time expecting public services to be the same is a stupid and unrealistic view of how the world works to be perfectly frank with you.

    Everyone is feeling the burn. This does -not- mean that the government is doing the wrong thing, not by a long way.

    Cry that financial crisis needs to be averted; "don`t cut our pay, cut everyone elses."
  79. Profile photo of Listypoos
    Listypoos Male 40-49
    3069 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 5:52 am
    Mildcorma, how does that address the hypocrisy in the government encouraging violent protests in middle eastern countries whilst ignoring large numbers of protesters in their own country?

    and actually polls showed around 20% of Conservative voters were in favour the protest march - so it wasn`t just all labour voters at all.
  80. Profile photo of Listypoos
    Listypoos Male 40-49
    3069 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 5:55 am
    @Mildcorma

    you say "Cry that financial crisis needs to be averted; "don`t cut our pay, cut everyone elses."

    erm... you mean like the hypocrisy of the government saying `we`re all in this together` and cuting police, health, closing libraries etc. but then forcing the MP expenses committee to back down on cutting expenses to the politicians?

    don`t cut our expenses...cut everyone else`s?
  81. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 7:38 am
    Honestly after reading the comments. IAB just all proves 5 Cats video. It`s a mirror image.

    Thanks again @handys003 - I sure am glad some folks `get it`. Baalth are you listening?

    @Crackr quotes Obama himself saying he`s done the wrong thing, and all @Baalth and the left can do is chant "Bush is Bad! Bush told Lies!" it`s exactly like the video.

    @Baath there were TWICE as many nations involved in Gulf II, DOUBLE the number. Please to explain your math: Bush gets 24 countries to join, Obama gets 12, THEREFOR Obama has MORE SUPPORT.
    You`re fast becoming a joke Baalth, and not in that good way...
    Links to follow!

  82. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 7:48 am
    Links: Hey @Baalth, where did you get "20 days of vacation" from? Is that this year? In his 2 years in office? You`ve adjusted the number, that`s... so liberal of you!

    Wiki on Gulf War II
    Just read the overview, it clearly states the multiple reasons, the UN orders, the whole multi-national thing.

    UN Resolution 1441
    Which CLEARLY orders member nations to use force to get Hussain to comply with the cease-fire. @Piperfawn you read this! Not just WMDs but all the weapons programs he was doing which violated the UN orders.

    Multi-National Forces in Gulf War II
    Count
  83. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 7:54 am
    Count `em Baalth! There`s acually 39 countries THIRTY NINE.

    Multi-National Forces in Libya

    There`s 14, not 12, but my point is still valid. 39 > 14

    They "came up with it after the invasion" oh really? I guess Resolution 1441 was just re-written and no one noticed.
    U - R delusional dude.
  84. Profile photo of Solvent
    Solvent Male 18-29
    2842 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 8:27 am
    I might actually give a poo if the voice acting in these things wasn`t so horrible.
  85. Profile photo of OutWest
    OutWest Male 50-59
    546 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 8:32 am
    Maybe we can send Libyans captured to Guantanamo? Unless it is being closed again?
  86. Profile photo of baglad
    baglad Male 18-29
    29 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:11 am
    ITT butthurt amerifags defend their political party, failing to realise that the two main parties are exactly the drating same.
    You guys dont weight up the actions of two parties against each other because they would react to every situation in pretty much the exact same fashion.

    Enjoy voting in the people powerfull corporations are telling you to vote in having paid both parties the same amount of money to do whatever it wants.
  87. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 12:34 pm
    Banging head against wall
  88. Profile photo of FunBunny
    FunBunny Female 18-29
    174 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 1:43 pm
    this video is exactly what I-am-bored means lol
    :-P
  89. Profile photo of kummi90
    kummi90 Male 18-29
    541 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 1:53 pm
    Difference between Iraq and Libya is that US still in Iraq. And with Libya, the US is backed by most Western countries. In fact, teh UN leads teh charge. Also, Bush ILLEGALLY went into Iraq. Iraq was purely oil-driven.
  90. Profile photo of ak9882
    ak9882 Male 18-29
    39 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:04 pm
    Boring video, and the only point it made is that an uninformed person will lose an argument with someone who knows what they`re talking about.

    If we were the ones who initiated the attacks (it was the French), if we make false claims about Libya having WMDs (we aren`t), if we have an occupational force on the ground and start preaching about "nation-building" and "winning the hearts and minds" of the Libyans (we don`t), then comparisons can be made.

    We decided that we would back our NATO allies in the attack after Gaddafi said he would invite Al-Qaida into Libya so they could have a launching base into Europe.
  91. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3431 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:08 pm
    We have to help Libya now because in twenty years we`ll need them as allies to help overthrow our own dictator.
  92. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:36 pm
    [quote">Please describe to me how Libya is an imminent or actual threat to the USA ?[/quote">

    Please describe to me how Iraq was an imminent or actual threat to the USA?

    You can`t, because it wasn`t

    550 tons of yellowcake:
    It did not come from Nigeria, and were from decades old reactor projects.Source

    Pre-cursor chemicals:
    Last I checked ingredients != final product. Okay we found pre-cursor chemicals but no actual chemical weapons? I`ll also mention that after the first Gulf War Iraq`s infrastructure was smashed which definetely could have caused problems for those programs.
  93. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:51 pm
    Mobile chemical weapons labs:
    So according to a guy who (would later admit to his false testimony) after REPEATED warnings from the BND (German intelligence) regarding his integrity, we were somehow convinced there were mobile bioweapons/chemical weapons labs? Niether one makes ANY sense to me logistically, especially considering the poor state Iraq`s infrastructure was in (repairs were made to roads but they were VERY substandard). We later found out that those were hydrogen gas weather balloon machines.
    Wait why hydrogen you ask? Simple it is much cheaper to produce and Saddam was broke after the first Gulf War.
  94. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 2:57 pm
    Obama is in a much better stance this time around than Bush was as this situation was not of the former`s making.

    Now I`m fine with air support but if there`s boots on the ground then they BETTER be out within a month. If not: I hope to GOD Ron Paul runs.
  95. Profile photo of IkeRay
    IkeRay Male 18-29
    2704 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 5:02 pm
    sorry, that went on way too long. in a real situation, he would`ve walked away at ~2:30 when she said that stupid remark about windmills

  96. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 5:31 pm
    much cheaper to produce

    ...than helium

    --fixed
  97. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 5:54 pm
    Cajun: You are forgetting that Saddam had tons of chemical shells hidden inside a bunker, and many other buried outside the same bunker.

    Iraq was a threat to Israel and had fired several missiles at Israel during the first gulf war. He still had those missiles during the second gulf war. Saddam gassed his own people and killed thousands of others via firing squad.

    Gaddafi is no threat to Israel or any of his neighbors, Has no gas or missiles and completely gave up his nuclear program after Saddam was ousted.

    Obama was happy to just sanction him until he bombed the oil pipelines. His hypocrisy is self-evident in his own anti-war statements.

    This war is about oil, This dictator is genuinely not a threat, and Obama is a Grade A number 1 hypocrite.
  98. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 6:36 pm
    Okay did we find anything that was produced after the first Gulf War?

    Now what kept him from using those stockpiles was ,as a matter of fact, a US retaliation (sounds MAD wouldn`t you say), plus the fact he even WANTED to restore good relations with the US he had before the first Gulf War. So there was no proof of a major WMD program which was the GREATEST rationale for the invasion of Iraq.
  99. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 6:37 pm
    In regards to my question:

    I`m not referring to "precursor chemicals" they can be used for many different other things.
  100. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 9:29 pm
    Oh BTW this really ISN`T about oil, as a matter of fact you could even ask "What the HELL are we doing there?"

    From Monica Crowley`s website:
    "Isn`t Libya a sideshow? The US doesn`t have any real strategic interests there. Yes, Libya is an oil producer but a relatively minor one. Isn`t the real crisis in Yemen, where the government just slaughtered over 50 protesters and which is now the world`s premiere locale for al Qaeda`s operatives to plan and launch attacks against the United States and the West?"
  101. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 9:33 pm
    Say check this chart out and tell me if this is REALLY about oil.

  102. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 9:50 pm
    Oh and before you start complaining about incomplete information:


    In 2002 Iraq produced 2.64% of the world`s oil that year.
    In 2010 Libya produced 2.07% of the world`s oil that year.

    Anymore questions?
  103. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 9:54 pm
    Crakrjak said: Iraq was a threat to Israel and had fired several missiles at Israel during the first gulf war. He still had those missiles during the second gulf war. Saddam gassed his own people and killed thousands of others via firing squad.
    Bullsh*t. Not why we invaded Iraq. Not what we were sold. We invaded because Iraq was an immediate threat to the US, UK and others and had weaponised WMDs. *NOT* because Saddam was a bit of a dick. I think if WMDs had been found, it would have made the news by now. Don`t you? Maybe I missed the memo. Say, has anyone checked down the back of the couch yet.

    Bait and switch much?
  104. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 9:55 pm
    5Cats said: It`s truely pathetic how the MSM, the liberal left and the "peace" people are 100% hypocrites!... And leftards gulp the kool-aid down and ask for seconds... You`ve adjusted the number, that`s... so liberal of you!
    Yeah, yeah, we get it 5Cats. Anyone who holds political views that differ from yours (right-wing conservative) is clearly a hypocrite, a retard, and a liar. I guess that includes me.
  105. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:17 pm
    Cajun: Saddam was not looking to restore good relations with the US or the UN, He kicked out nuclear inspection teams and bragged that he had WMDs and was going to use them !

    Nice try at revisionist history there Cajun, but Saddam and his sons and his staff were bastards that had used WMDs, still had WMDs and the missiles capable of attacking Israel with them.
  106. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:20 pm
    We invaded because Iraq was an immediate threat to the US, UK and others and had weaponised WMDs.

    They did, but they were old (produced before first Gulf War) and most of them were in very poor condition. Saddam didn`t even want to use them in fear of a US retaliation.
  107. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:23 pm
    bragged that he had WMDs and was going to use them

    Like how North Korea just brags about how it`s going to use it`s nukes. I`m just waiting patiently until that nation crumbles.
  108. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:29 pm
    Cajun: Nice try with the oil disruption chart dated February 2011, It`s now March and the disruption is far worse. Libya normally produces 1.6 million barrels of oil per day, and since the fighting began all that has halted. That would elevate it`s status on your chart to near the Suez War and the 6 day war.

    So Yes, THIS IS ABOUT OIL.
  109. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:30 pm
    Cajun: North Korea is a threat too, Unfortunately China is the major stumbling block there, Otherwise we would`ve won the Korean war.
  110. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:42 pm
    1.6 million barrels of oil per day



    Yeah and in 2002 Iraq produced 2.009 million barrels of oil per day. So by your same logic Iraq`s bar should elevated as well.
  111. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:44 pm
    davymid: The Clintons, most other democrats at the time, Great Britain, and the UN were all sure Saddam was up to no good. He was paying the families of suicide bombers $20,000 each.

    Iraq was harboring Abdul Rahman Yasin, a suspect in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, Iraqis provided bomb-making expertise and advice to Al-Qaida and in fact one of the `93 WTC bombers was Iraqi. Saddam may not have pre-knowledge of the 9/11 attacks, but he definitely was involved in supporting Islamic Jihad and Al-Qaida in the 90s.
  112. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 10:48 pm
    Cajun: Iraqs oil has too high a sulphur content, US refineries can not use it and thus do not buy it because of EPA standards.

    Libya however has light sweet crude with a low sulphur content and that is definitely the kind of oil we would buy, however most of Libya`s oil is actually sold to Italy and France. Since those countries cannot buy it from Libya right now, that increases demand on the sources that we do buy light sweet crude from.

    THIS IS ABOUT OIL.
  113. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:01 pm
    US refineries can not use it and thus do not buy it because of EPA standards.

    This is not just about exports this is about supply. Then again 30% of those exports go somewhere within the western hemisphere.
  114. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:09 pm
    ...and another 22% goes to Europe.
  115. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:14 pm
    US refineries can not use it and thus do not buy it because of EPA standards.

    Actually wait, that`s not true, the EPA is so unpopular they`ve been gutted repeatedly by the federal government. According to the Department of Energy we`ve imported 627,000 barrels of oil a day from Iraq in 2008.
  116. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:18 pm
    Here`s the source

    <gasp> Get this in the same year we only imported 103,000 barrels a day from Libya the same year.
  117. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:19 pm
    Cajun: different crude oils are separated on the commodities exchanges for good reason, they are considered different supplies.

    If natural gas suddenly gets more expensive in Europe that does not effect the US or Canada much at all. Why ? Because Europe buys from Russia, The US and Canada have their own local sources.

    Since high sulphur crude is not what we buy, Iraqs oil was not important to the US.

    Since Libya has the same type of crude that we normally buy, that supply is important to us even though we don`t buy it directly from them.

    So all the Iraq war protesters screaming "No War For Oil" & "No Blood For Oil" were erroneous. Were they protesting this Libya war however, they would be correct.
  118. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:25 pm
    ...except I`ve already shown you with statistics that the US does buy oil from Iraq more than it does from Libya.
  119. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:39 pm
    Cajun: hidden deep within your link "The majority of Iraqi oil exports go to refineries in Asia, especially China, India, and South Korea." Mainly through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline.

    627,000 barrels of oil a day is less than a 3rd of it`s total production, which is from the southern fields near Kuwait. That is less than half of Libya`s 1.6 million barrels a day. Saudi Arabia exports 1.5 million barrels a day to the US in comparison.

    So again, THIS WAR IS ABOUT OIL.
  120. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:42 pm
    davymid: The Clintons, most other democrats at the time, Great Britain, and the UN were all sure Saddam was up to no good. He was paying the families of suicide bombers $20,000 each.
    You`re right there. But I`m pretty sure that "being sure that someone`s up to no good" is not a justifiable reason to invade their house.

    Heck, my neighbours across the street have a big truck and a boat in their driveway and a villa in Florida. And I see a lot of people coming and going from their front door. I`m pretty sure they`re drug dealers.

    Let`s say I call the cops and voice my fears that they are in fact dealing drugs. The cops take my concern seriously and check them out, but having nothing legal or evidential to go on, tell me that they have no justifiable reason to raid their house.
  121. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:42 pm
    So I take matters into my own hands. I break into their house, kicking in the front door, shooting off my machine gun my while shouting things like "Go! Go! Go!" to my motley assortment of neighbours that I`ve gathered to my cause.

    So now I`ve taken it upon myself to assault the house, I`ve shot a few people in the face on the way in, and now I`m going to go find that pesky drugs stash. It was justifiable, dammit!

    Turns out, there`s no drugs. Not so much as a gram of pot. Apparently dude made his money from investment banking, and although he was a undoubtedly a dick (maybe I saw him slapping his wife around a bit), I just took it upon myself to rape his house to find the drug stash. You know, the one we told the police about.
  122. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:44 pm
    Man, I should’ve been a playwright. In case there`s any doubt, here`s the cast in this story:
    Me- Dubya Bush.
    Neighbour- Saddam Hussein.
    Police- UN/NATO/International Community.
    Motley Neighbours Assisting- Moldova, Kazakhstan, Estonia, Tonga etc.

    Though 5Cats had a point back there. Bush and Blair`s internationally illegal invasion of Iraq without UN sanction was definitely supported by more countries than support the current no-fly zone in Libya.

    Those countries mentioned above provided about 140 troops between them. The current action in Libya is being supported by a cheeky new-fangled upstart conglomerate called NATO/United Nations.
  123. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:46 pm
    hidden deep within your link "The majority of Iraqi oil exports go to refineries in Asia, especially China, India, and South Korea." Mainly through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline.

    So we ask those countries to refine it for us, big drating deal.
  124. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:46 pm
    davymid: Unfortunately you forgot that your neighbors, In your scenario, would`ve been bragging that they not only had drugs but they were selling them too. Also that those neighbors had sold and used drugs in the past and were caught doing so.

    I think that`s case enough for any judge to issue a search warrant.

    Your analogy fails Davy.
  125. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:50 pm
    So granted we can refine 107,000 barrels thanks to it`s low sulphur content, but again they don`t produce as much oil as Iraq does. Now on the other hand Iraq produces six times that amount but since we can`t refine it here, companies like BP and ExxonMobile will send it to refineries in Asia and wherever else where they don`t have such restrictions. Then that gets shipped to America.

    That`s called a loophole.
  126. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:54 pm
    Cajun: They don`t refine it for us, they refine it for themselves.

    The US has over 100 different blends of gasoline because, once again, of EPA standards for each individual state and even metropolitan regions within those states to reduce smog and even different seasons of the year. We don`t import refined gasoline.
  127. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 27, 2011 at 11:58 pm
    [quote">We don`t import refined gasoline.[/quote">

    Again you`re wrong.
  128. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:02 am
    davymid: Unfortunately you forgot that your neighbors, In your scenario, would`ve been bragging that they not only had drugs but they were selling them too. Also that those neighbors had sold and used drugs in the past and were caught doing so. I think that`s case enough for any judge to issue a search warrant.

    Your analogy fails Davy.
    If I appeal to the courts/police that my neighbour`s house should be searched based on his proud boast of his house being full of drugs, and the courts/police tell me that I have no case, that does not give me the right to storm into his house as a civilian and shoot the place up. I`d be arrested as a criminal.
  129. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:02 am
    I`d at least be somewhat absolved of my crime if the police entering the scene at a later date found out that I was in fact right and there was a half-pound of cocaine hidden in the garage. Don`t get me wrong, I`d still be in jail for assault, but at least my actions would have been in some way justified, postmortem.

    I think you`ll find my analogy pretty solid.
  130. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:06 am
    You know what Crakr you might as well stop, your assertion is completely invalid.

    This data clearly in plain english: we import crude from Iraq, and seeing you can`t provide sources this is just getting silly.
  131. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:11 am
    davymid: Your analogy still fails. Any judge in this country would`ve issued a warrant in that case and your fellow policeman including yourself would`ve raided the house. Davy, American forces make up the majority of UN forces worldwide, We are the police because we have the carriers and air mobility to carry out such missions.

    That`s right in your scenario you`d BE a policeman yourself.
  132. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:13 am
    would`ve been bragging that they not only had drugs but they were selling them too

    Probably was the dumbest joke in the world.
  133. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:18 am
    You know what I`ll be back.

    Need Zs.
  134. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:18 am
    Cajun: We import very little from Iraq now, compared to the other countries we import from. What I said stands their oil has too high a sulphur content and that oil is sent to China, India, and elsewhere in Asia. We do not import gasoline from Asia, as you asserted. EIA Link
  135. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:26 am
    Well seems we`re using the same source lets see now.

    <Selects products tab, scrolls to crude oil>

    Aha you see in July 2010 we imported 13,334 barrels from Iraq and 1,931 from Libya.

    So do the math
    13334 > 1931
    and
    13334 >= 6*1931
  136. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:29 am


    See ya next time!
  137. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:30 am
    Cajun: What is sold at your local gas station, even if it is initially refined in Canada, The Netherlands or Great Britain has to be further processed in American refineries before it can be sold to the public, The vast majority of which comes from Canada. Sorry, but I don`t consider Canada a `foreign country`, They`ve been one of our best friends and allies. Canada is our largest neighbor and one of our top trading partners in the world.
  138. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:41 am
    Cajun: You`re still skipping over the fact that Libya produces more of the same light sweet crude that we buy 1.6 million barrels a day vs. .65 million from Iraq (a mere 30% of their total output). Even though we don`t buy Libyan oil that puts pressure, from other countries that did buy their oil from Libya, on the same LSC commodities market we buy from.

    And as I said Saudi Arabia is exporting 1.5 million barrels of LSC to America in comparison.
    in other words, The loss of Libyas LSC to the market is worse than if Saudi Arabia quit selling oil to us.

    Does that sink in now ?
  139. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 5:25 am
    Bush and Blair`s internationally illegal invasion of Iraq without UN sanction
    @davymid appaerntly didn`t even glance at UN Resolution 1441...
    provided about 140 troops between them
    Many offered financial support or logistic aid. Your point exactly? Are all 14 nations in Libya sending their entire airforce? Nope. That`s the nature of a coalition, eh? Again you say it`s bad when Bush does it and good when Obama does it. Hummmm.
    Yeah, yeah, we get it 5Cats.
    Not hard to `get it` @davymid: the self-titled "peace movement" isn`t about peace at all, they`re just anti-Republicans.
    Regan invades Grenada = protests
    Bush Sr invades Iraq = protests
    Clinton invades Croatia = NO protests
    Bush Jr invades Afghanistan = protests
    Bush Jr re-invades Iraq = protests
    Obama invades Libya = NO PROTESTS
  140. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 5:26 am
    PLEASE don`t quibble about `invade`: he`s gone to war (WAR! the opposite of "peace" eh?) and didn`t even get Congressional approval, or even address the nation! He got his NCAA picks out tho, CNN spent 10 minutes on THAT!
  141. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 5:41 am
    5CATS say "@Piperfawn conveniently forgets that Saddam threatened the lives of the weapons inspectors, forcing them to flee the country. For 2 years he refused to let them back in. He had plenty of time to move his weapons to Syria, and there`s ample evidence he did just that. Israel blew them up a couple of years ago btw, in Syria.
    The Ceaase Fire Agreement (which stopped the first Gulf War, not Bush Sr) required Saddam to guarentee the safety and free access to the weapons inspectors. Since Saddam violated that, and many other parts of the CFA, the UN said `game on!` for the second Gulf War."
    Hey friend could you do me the favour to watch this before spitting lies?
    Weapon inspectors in Iraq
  142. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 5:51 am
    5CATS here another link that can clarify you the situation. Bush Blair lies
  143. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 6:17 am
    Ohh and at last 5Cats please listen what this others cats have to explain to you.
    Iraq war: legal or illegal?
  144. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 6:39 am
    You`re still skipping over the fact that Libya produces more of the same light sweet crude that we buy 1.6 million barrels a day vs. .65 million from Iraq (a mere 30% of their total output).

    ...and I`ve already told those numbers are completely wrong. Where is your source regarding Iraq`s high sulphur content? I can`t find it on Bing or Google.
  145. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 6:45 am
    Look at the tables again Crakr it clearly says that we imported 6 times more oil from Iraq than we do from Libya in the past seven years. That is a cold, hard, fact. Your assertion regarding LSC is completely irrelevant at this point.
  146. Profile photo of Burton_Ian
    Burton_Ian Male 18-29
    815 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 7:25 am
    I hate how pure reason, dialectic, is no longer the basis for nationstates` logic; instead everything is politicized. It was foolish to invade Iraq and it is follish to have invaded Libya, any person who says that two exchangable cases warrant opposite results are simply following polical lines.

    Either we should have attacked both, or neither.
  147. Profile photo of bintish
    bintish Male 18-29
    64 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 7:27 am
    Who made this bullpoo? I`d love to see where their politics lie. Also, Does the author not realise that it was the europeans who decided that going in was the best thing to happen and asked for help?

    Man, the shallow mindedness of this, both about Iraq and Lybia. It makes me shudder.
  148. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 8:22 am
    And 5Cats on your answer to davymid you say "Obama invades Libya = NO PROTESTS"....WRONG!
    There is NO invasion in Libya, not a single ground troop is invading the soil of Libya. You continue to compare two things that are so differents. Is like to compare apples with elephants.
  149. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 8:26 am
    And also if you want to keep consider this an invasion (wich is not true) this is made by UN/NATO and not by Obama alone. Bush Blair and Poland have INVADED Iraq sending tons and tons of ground troops without UN/Nato agreement. Bush is direct responsible for this choice,Obama is just cooperating in an international task force under UN/NATO rule, can you see the difference?
  150. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 8:49 am

  151. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 9:03 am
    Obama invades Libya = NO PROTESTS

    Wrong on both fronts actually:
  152. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 9:41 am
    Cajun: Libya`s oil is still a part of the LSC market

    Iraq has mainly `Heavy Crude` over 1% sulphur content. Google books result

    Northern Iraq`s heavy crude oils with API gravities (11–17) and high sulfur content (6–7.5%) wt. are contained in five oil fields most of which is exported via the Iraq-Turkey pipeline.
  153. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 9:57 am
    @Crakr

    Then why were we importing six times more oil from Iraq then we were from Libya?
  154. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:04 am
    Cajun: The only news coverage I`ve seen is of a small anti-war protest in Phoenix numbering a dozen or so people. If there are larger protests they certainly are not being covered by the media, definitely not like the heavy coverage they got during GW Bush`s years.

    I also have to note the 3 - 9/11 truther signs and the 6 "healthcare not warfare" signs in your submitted picture, 3 signs out of all of them mention Libya (two of them are partly hidden), Also note the lack of "No blood for oil" signs.

    I have a feeling this was a pic from a rally supporting Palestinians, before Libya became really violent. Why ? Because of the Palestinian flag over the fake coffin.
  155. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:07 am
    Cajun: We don`t buy Libyan oil because Libya has contracts to sell it to Italy, France, and Spain, and the US had a 37 year old embargo against Libya until last year. Time article
  156. Profile photo of greenbasterd
    greenbasterd Male 18-29
    2377 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:12 am
    @cajun.. ummmm cause US already owns that country duhhhhhhhh
  157. Profile photo of Quackor
    Quackor Male 18-29
    2856 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:18 am
    this is totally unbiased.
  158. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:53 am
    @Cajun Tineye cannot find your image, probably because it`s shopped! Is that BUSH in the background? Why yes it is!

    The Answerla site lists that protest as against the 8th anniversary of Iraq. Some lip service was paid to Libya, it`s true. Mostly it was anti-Bush tho... unless they made the sign BEFORE the airstrikes began...
  159. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:55 am
    *sigh* PiperFawn quibbled.
    It`s Obama`s illegal war because he violated the US Constitution. (which he sword an oath to uphold!) It`s WAR! There will be `boots on the ground` sooner or later, until then it`s STILL A WAR.
  160. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 11:04 am
    I fell asleep after a minute. This person needs to stay away from YouTube and get a blog.
  161. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4907 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 12:51 pm
    Hmm explain how Obama violate constitution please. I suggest you to read article VI of U.S constitution before reply.
    Article VI say "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land". So the treatie done wit U.N
    automaticaly legitimate the intervention.
    I suggest you to revisit this link and if you find is to long for you can just skip to mins 3:50.Link
  162. Profile photo of HeadiesRusH
    HeadiesRusH Male 18-29
    328 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 1:58 pm
    I support Obama and yet I agree with this video %100. This "no fly zone" was undoubtedly the dumbest thing that Obama has gotten involved with during his time in office and it can only come back to bite the rest of us in the ass.
  163. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 2:07 pm
    It`s Obama`s illegal war because he violated the US Constitution


    Last I checked Article 2 Sec 2 Clause 5 clearly states that the president is the commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy (and Air Force). While he cannot declare war he can certainly commit acts of war. Also every president since the inception of the War Powers act has ignored said act.
  164. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 2:23 pm
    @Crakr

    Be that as it may Libya is still a very minor producer of oil including light sweet crude. Algeria, Norway, Nigeria, Venezuela etc produce more all produce more LSC than Libya does.
  165. Profile photo of OutWest
    OutWest Male 50-59
    546 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 5:14 pm
    I don`t care. GW was a liar. I don`t care. Your side did it first and your side does it worse. I don`t care.

    Somehow was that not the point?
  166. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 6:38 pm
    Cajun: 1.6 million barrels a day is NOT a small producer, That`s more than the Saudis sell to us.
  167. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 6:56 pm
    IF (and only if) there is an IMMEDIATE THREAT to the USA - then the POTUS can declare war. Was there, from Libya? Less than from Iraq (which I agree was tiny, eh?)

    Obama in 2002:
    Now let me be clear; I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.
    He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

    But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors... and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

    Funny how it`s the opposite now...
  168. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 7:48 pm
    is NOT a small producer


    Except that they are only the 17th largest producer in the world coming in behind:
    Saudi Arabia
    Iran
    United Arab Emirates
    Kuwait
    Iraq
    Algeria
    Angola
    Nigeria

    ...and the 15th largest exporter coming in behind:
    Saudi Arabia
    United Arab Emirates
    Iran
    Kuwait
    Nigeria
    Algeria
    Iraq
  169. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 7:54 pm
    So lets see:
    Saudi Arabia
    Iran
    UAE
    Kuwait
    Iraq
    Algeria
    Nigeria

    All of these are more strategically important than Libya, except for Iran of course. Hell Algeria is just West of Libya and they definitely produce and export more, there`s unrest there too.
  170. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 8:03 pm
    IF (and only if) there is an IMMEDIATE THREAT to the USA - then the POTUS can declare war.

    Ironically 5Cats that`s not true either. The POTUS IS Commander-in-Chief of the Military making him able to "act with dispatch" something a legislature simply can`t do.
  171. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 28, 2011 at 10:03 pm
    Only congress can Declare war:

    Art 1 Sec 8 USC

    The POTUS legally do whatever the hell he wants to do with the Army and Navy.

    Art 2 Sec 5
  172. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    March 29, 2011 at 3:53 am
    5Cats: The `Threat` is to our economy and by that metric Obama`s chances at getting re-elected are threatened as well.

    Obama wants the economy to improve, as it did for Bill Clinton, If it doesn`t he will face the specter of a famous Reagan line "Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?" which will lead to his defeat in 2012.

    Fuel price increases lead to inflation in most other sectors of our economy and the Fed has no more room left to lower interest rates to combat it.

    This war is about oil, Obama knows it`s also about his re-election campaign. He will not get elected if gasoline goes over $5 a gallon, which would then trigger double digit inflation. He has to get rid of Gaddafi fast or he`s doomed to be another Jimmy Carter.
  173. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32805 posts
    March 29, 2011 at 5:44 am
    vv My point exactly @cajun! This is WAR not `response to a threat` at all. Bush was HUGELY criticized by the MSM for his wars even though he asked (and recieved) congressional approval. Bi-Partisan approval I might add! Obama? NOT!

    That`s the WHOLE POINT of this video, the very definition of hypocracy, a sad state of affairs...
  174. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10732 posts
    March 29, 2011 at 8:05 am
    @Crakr

    Now that I think about it your assertion earlier regarding my "oil disruption chart" is also flawed, as that would mean all production within a nation would be disrupted. If that were true it would be bring the war in Libya to a grinding halt.

    Also Nigeria produces more oil than Libya does and as well as more LSC so why aren`t we involved Nigeria then hmm? We also get plenty of LSC from Mexico and Canada and produce plenty of it ourselves.

    Since we do buy sour crude as a matter of fact more than we do we rely on Persian Gulf for oil from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE. If anything strategically we should be more worried about what`s going on in Bahrain than Libya.

    As a matter of fact sweet crude is more expensive than sour crude.
  175. Profile photo of Listypoos
    Listypoos Male 40-49
    3069 posts
    March 29, 2011 at 3:03 pm
    @mildcorma.......... yeah, I thought you`d go drating quiet when confronted with logic and facts.
  176. Profile photo of kdawg646
    kdawg646 Male 18-29
    5 posts
    April 6, 2011 at 12:53 pm
    GO microsoft voice

Leave a Reply