Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 139    Average: 4.4/5]
172 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 42367
Rating: 4.4
Category: Funny
Date: 03/30/11 03:57 PM

172 Responses to Facebook User Rallies For A Pepsi Boycott [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of someone?
    someone? Male 13-17
    1371 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 3:59 pm
    Link: Facebook User Rallies For A Pepsi Boycott - Unfortunately, he doesn`t do his research and fails miserably.
  2. Profile photo of DracObi
    DracObi Male 18-29
    289 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    BURRRRRN!!!!!!!!!!!!
  3. Profile photo of rammo34
    rammo34 Male 18-29
    1083 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    Those damn Pepsi-making heathens!
  4. Profile photo of Locke357
    Locke357 Male 18-29
    128 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    WIN
  5. Profile photo of PhantasmFork
    PhantasmFork Male 18-29
    168 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:05 pm
    I lol`d
  6. Profile photo of DShephard
    DShephard Male 18-29
    1595 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:06 pm
    Yeah!

    Go home everyone else!
  7. Profile photo of simonh92
    simonh92 Male 18-29
    193 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:06 pm
    Pepsi. For when they don`t have coke.
  8. Profile photo of Avalessa
    Avalessa Female 13-17
    491 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:07 pm
    Zing!
  9. Profile photo of Iniquity
    Iniquity Female 18-29
    96 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:08 pm
    Bravo.
  10. Profile photo of cityncolour
    cityncolour Male 30-39
    379 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:08 pm
    pwnd
  11. Profile photo of LionHeart-72
    LionHeart-72 Male 18-29
    521 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:11 pm
    Wow, he wrote many words so he must be an intellectual and everyone should listen to him.

    That`s how it works right?
  12. Profile photo of peloos12
    peloos12 Male 18-29
    3825 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:15 pm
    Sometimes I despise Facebook with every fiber of my being for the way it gives any idiot a platform to speak on.

    ... but then I see things like this and know it`s all worth it.
  13. Profile photo of iamroaaaared
    iamroaaaared Male 18-29
    13 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:16 pm
    remind me never to go to a party with Mr Blue here... same old sarcastic self-righteousness but with an extra twist of boring pedantry.
  14. Profile photo of WeePee
    WeePee Male 18-29
    612 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:19 pm
    can i still boycott pepsi because it tastes like garbage mixed with a lot of sugar?
  15. Profile photo of XbigXmommaX
    XbigXmommaX Female 18-29
    474 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:19 pm
    So well said and polite. I applaud this person.
  16. Profile photo of BakedBrotato
    BakedBrotato Male 18-29
    47 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:19 pm
    Facebook makes me hate everybody I know.
  17. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:22 pm
    Pwned.
  18. Profile photo of bacon_pie
    bacon_pie Male 30-39
    3061 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:24 pm
    people will always find something to bitch about.
  19. Profile photo of BlankTom
    BlankTom Male 30-39
    1674 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:24 pm
    Looks like the poster didn`t do his research. This "new" pepsi can is about 10 years old now.
  20. Profile photo of gothmo
    gothmo Female 18-29
    1324 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:24 pm
    @LionHeart

    or just the fact that he did his research and checked his facts, and has a good point that they just recognize the fact that not all American`s are christian or the like. Soooo...

    :D

    I agree with what he says, too. A lot of people are offended that it`s taken out of the pledge, but if we truly want to be equal we should anyway... A lot of American`s are muslim, Jehovah`s wittness (I probably butched the spelling, sorry...) catholic, christian, jewish, wiccan, protestant, mormon, presbyterian, agnostic, athiest, buddhist, shinto, etc.
  21. Profile photo of NDLOgan
    NDLOgan Male 30-39
    218 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:26 pm
    The only thing he/ she left out was that the can in question was actually Dr. Pepper (not distributed by Pepsi), manufactured in November 2001 after the 9/11 attacks. How in the hell were they going to put the whole pledge on a can of soda anyway? Really, really tiny print?
  22. Profile photo of IRockYeah
    IRockYeah Male 40-49
    2619 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:26 pm
    In short, what blue meant to say was......"shut the fu*k up you whiny little bitch"
  23. Profile photo of Reapergirl
    Reapergirl Female 18-29
    93 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:26 pm
    *politely applaudes Mr. Blue*
  24. Profile photo of sgibson12
    sgibson12 Male 30-39
    93 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:30 pm
    It`s always nice when an atheist jumps into a conversation. It`s kind of like getting a bucket a snake venom thrown on you. Imagine if every time an atheist speaks up people jump all over themm and point out that science doesn`t support the notion of life coming from non life and energy creating itself. Yet these are things atheists have to believe in order to maintain their no-god belief system. It`s so contradictory.

    Anyhow, it gets old when people insert heated religious debate into every casual conversation. And atheists are dumb.
  25. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:35 pm
    Its what happen with many people, they fight for something not even knowing its background history
  26. Profile photo of Milo_Pretzel
    Milo_Pretzel Female 18-29
    180 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:38 pm
    YAY BLUE!! :D
  27. Profile photo of MrYouKnow
    MrYouKnow Male 13-17
    1081 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:40 pm
    @sgibson12

    I don`t think most atheists believe in energy creating itself.
  28. Profile photo of jinxiejae
    jinxiejae Female 30-39
    2928 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:42 pm
    *don`t really give a crap either way, and drinks coke anyway.
  29. Profile photo of Atrayu4u
    Atrayu4u Female 18-29
    1478 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:42 pm
    I agree, yet I don`t. "In God We Trust" is what Americans have adopted as one of our slogans, and I`m for that. I see no problem in keeping with our relatively new tradition. The statement, "But people who don`t believe in your Jesus should just go back home, right?".. now -that- is ignorant. My religious beliefs are my own, and I don`t push them on anyone. My opinions, however.. :D
  30. Profile photo of Boredered
    Boredered Male 18-29
    2508 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:42 pm
    Now is anyone gonna research any of that, or are we taking his word for it?
  31. Profile photo of Neko_Sik
    Neko_Sik Female 18-29
    697 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:42 pm
    Awesome person that blue. I love people like him. People who can educate without sounding arrogant or rude, yelling at people trying to force them to understand. Blue is a good person
  32. Profile photo of dude21862004
    dude21862004 Male 18-29
    768 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:43 pm
    "It`s always nice when an atheist jumps into a conversation. It`s kind of like getting a bucket a snake venom thrown on you. Imagine if every time an atheist speaks up people jump all over themm and point out that science doesn`t support the notion of life coming from non life and energy creating itself. Yet these are things atheists have to believe in order to maintain their no-god belief system. It`s so contradictory.

    Anyhow, it gets old when people insert heated religious debate into every casual conversation. And atheists are dumb."
    No. Just, no.
  33. Profile photo of Atrayu4u
    Atrayu4u Female 18-29
    1478 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:43 pm
    And I`ll buy Pepsi `cause I damn well like it, not because someone does or does not put a religious/national statement on it.
  34. Profile photo of HOBOMOE
    HOBOMOE Male 18-29
    515 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:44 pm
    I like Mr. blue here
  35. Profile photo of ED-209
    ED-209 Male 30-39
    53 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:44 pm
    @sgibson12 -- How are atheists dumb? I don`t want to necessarily call god lovers dumb, but accepting a whole way of life on blind faith is...well...dumb.
  36. Profile photo of ggolbez
    ggolbez Male 18-29
    1933 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:45 pm
    PWND!
  37. Profile photo of whocares3725
    whocares3725 Male 18-29
    310 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:45 pm
    @sgibson12 Although you`re going to make me look like I`m proving your point about "atheists jumping into conversation" I`ll ignore this since it seems your question was aimed at me, so I`m just replying.

    People CAN`T say that science doesn`t support that because based on what we know now, its the most logical explanations (i.e. better than "god did it"). Should new, statistical or experimentally backed evidence arise that disproves the current theories, I`m sure atheists would change their minds and accept those new, more evidenced theories. Religious nuts, on the other hand, refuse to believe in proofs and stick to their "god did it" explanation.

    I do, however, agree on people bringing religion into every. single. debate. Just one of the reasons we shouldn`t have to worry about it, but hey, that`s just my beliefs.

    Hows that snake venom feel?
  38. Profile photo of PsychGeek
    PsychGeek Female 18-29
    1798 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:46 pm
    "And atheists are dumb." So are bible-thumping closed-minded Christians :)
  39. Profile photo of MrYouKnow
    MrYouKnow Male 13-17
    1081 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:47 pm
    @Neko Sik

    That last sentence seemed pretty rude to me.
  40. Profile photo of evanbartlett
    evanbartlett Male 30-39
    559 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:48 pm
    "Imagine if every time an atheist speaks up people jump all over themm and point out that science doesn`t support the notion of life coming from non life and energy creating itself. Yet these are things atheists have to believe in order to maintain their no-god belief system. It`s so contradictory."

    Wow... the creation of what we now know as "life" happened when molecules in the primordial soup made primarily of proteins and carbohydrates were quantified by lightning, ultimately creating the precursors to RNA. (which has been done...I`ve done it myself in Post Doc.) Energy didn`t, nor does it, create itself, and no one is positing it as such. Believe what you like, but don`t make fun of people who are making progress through research and experimentation. What is great and terrible about our country is that you get to keep expounding your believes, even as it drags down our math, science and reading scores compared to more civilized and rational nations.
  41. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:50 pm
    Mostly correct except the pledge was originally created in the September 8, 1892 issue of the popular children`s magazine The Youth`s Companion as part of the National Public-School Celebration of Columbus Day, a celebration of the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus`s arrival in the Americas (not to sell flags, which sounds retarded anyway)

    Also it was Dr. Pepper, not Pepsi and IT WAS 10 YEARS AGO
  42. Profile photo of Oscola
    Oscola Male 18-29
    349 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:53 pm
    The only reason to boycott something like that isn`t because it omits a part of the pledge or because it doesn`t share your same religious values, but because it`s another example of counting down the ticker to cash in on disasters. Even though this was a hoax. P.S. Please continue the science Vs. Religion debate because I have a funny feeling that we`re almost at a breakthrough here, finally, on the digital plains of IAB, after years of debate between people who have no real expertise in the field, I think we`re going to crack this nut and find out once and for all who is right, the Atheists or the Religious. Continue.
  43. Profile photo of showstoprake
    showstoprake Male 18-29
    90 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:54 pm
    @sgibson12 Its quite ignorant of you to deduce from the above notion that the one that speaks out the truth is an atheist! He could be from some other religion! So that makes you the dumb.

    And anyway atheists have no such thing as "no-god belief system". Atheists don`t believe in anything. They just approve or disapprove ideas. If you give ample evidence of God existing, I am sure atheists will be more than happy to come under a religion. Unlike the religious who say to scientists -"God put it there to test your faith"
  44. Profile photo of ElMustache
    ElMustache Male 18-29
    1625 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:57 pm
    =) History: Look it up, bitches.
  45. Profile photo of Skythe
    Skythe Male 18-29
    965 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:57 pm
    Zing!
  46. Profile photo of shappy
    shappy Male 18-29
    757 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:59 pm
    so how do you say owned in russian?
  47. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:05 pm
    Looks like 4 of 5 Americans, statistically, are batsh*t stupid.

    Bad odds indeed, yet not bad enough that we can start making blanket assumptions.
  48. Profile photo of Hiromi
    Hiromi Female 18-29
    1149 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:07 pm
    This won so hard..
  49. Profile photo of bianchi
    bianchi Female 18-29
    606 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:10 pm
    Oh, I see... Mr Blue also captured this screen and sent it to the ones in charge so everyone can see how witty and smart and enlightened he is. Hooray. You win the internetz, Mr Blue!

    Seriously, I don`t know if that was warranted. Was it necessary to embarrass this person? Seriously? Lecturing someone on FB? Get a life, man. Oh well. Whatever.
  50. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25406 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:11 pm
    Owned comes to mind
  51. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:14 pm
    The Pledge itself is stupid horsesh*t anyway.
  52. Profile photo of asnodeus
    asnodeus Male 18-29
    101 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:18 pm
    I would sooo like to see the reply of the boycotting guy. :)
  53. Profile photo of Jasonbobdude
    Jasonbobdude Male 18-29
    1598 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:20 pm
    It doesn`t say anywhere that the blue one is an atheist. He`s just more sensible than the others, regardless of his beliefs.
  54. Profile photo of HarryBalszak
    HarryBalszak Male 40-49
    1589 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:26 pm
    And I`ve been boycotting Pepsi all these years because I don`t like the taste...
  55. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7423 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:29 pm
    amen blue.
  56. Profile photo of yusuksomuch
    yusuksomuch Male 40-49
    1008 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:31 pm
    4 out of 5 candiens are statistically eh-holes
    4 out of 5 europeans are statisically oi-holes
    4 out 5 asians are statistically hu-holes
    4 out 5 martians are statisically gew-holes

    dumbasses
  57. Profile photo of Oscola
    Oscola Male 18-29
    349 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    It`s hard to tell if Cobrakillers comment was a glimpse of subtle genius or not.
  58. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:36 pm
    @Oscola: you are obviously a Sarcastic person. As an Acastic person myself, I just hate it when you take your sarcasm and rub it in the face of `facts` and `evidence` like being all sarky makes it true! I used to believe in Sarcasm when I was young, my parents were Roman Sarcastics, but grew out of it.
    (/sarc)

    Seriously @bianchi, lecturing someone on IAB... oh wait, are you a Sarcastic person too? (lolz)

    Nice work @fivezones, I hope some IABers gain some intelligence after reading your post. (not sarc!)
  59. Profile photo of AngryYouth
    AngryYouth Male 18-29
    734 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:40 pm
    @LazyMe484 Well, if I assumed that all Canadians were like you, I could also assume that all Canadians are ignorant non-nice individuals who would condemn an entire nation of people as stupid because of something trivial.

    But I won`t, because that would be asinine.
  60. Profile photo of Oscola
    Oscola Male 18-29
    349 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:43 pm
    5cats, did you just double sarc me then? I can`t tell any more. (not sarc)

    P.S. I wasn`t being sarky to cobrakiller. "amen blue" was the shortest possible ironic comment for this post. (not sarc)

    P.P.S. I wasn`t being sarky about people cashing in on disasters. (not sarc)

    P.P.P.S. Please everyone continue the religion vs science debate. We`re almost there guys. Another few ranting comments and I think we`ll know for sure who`s right. (not sarc) (Zike) (sarc) (double bluff sarc).
  61. Profile photo of Cutie9778
    Cutie9778 Female 13-17
    7 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:46 pm
    I call B.S. on this one. I have an 1880 silver dollar that has "In God We Trust" on it.
  62. Profile photo of Oscola
    Oscola Male 18-29
    349 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:48 pm
    Oooh and I just hit my 300th comment. It may not be much of a milestone, but in the Methodist Sarcastians it is the most holy of numbers. And as I was mentioning you at the time 5cats it means I literally (technically) (virtually) (hypothetically) ejaculated pixels all over you. I would ask you to return the favour but I don`t accept gifts from those who have lost faith. Happy Sarcantaal Day for the morning everyone.
  63. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:00 pm
    @Oscola: Thx! I nearly laughed to death when I wrote "Roman Sarcastic" :-)
    Congrats on 300... wait a minute, it`s 301! Fibber!
    I forgot to even mention your obvios BIAS! mister osCOLA!!!!



    YUP! @Cutie9778 is correct! It`s kinda hard to see in this low pixil, but there it is!
  64. Profile photo of Blutdurstig
    Blutdurstig Female 18-29
    165 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:05 pm
    He`s right about the "under God" part, but "In God we Trust" Has been used on currency since the 1860`s. He`s also correct about the Country being founded upon freedom, including freedom of religion. I dunno, interesting argument.
  65. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:07 pm
    Imagine if every time an atheist speaks up people jump all over themm and point out that science doesn`t support the notion of life coming from non life and energy creating itself. Yet these are things atheists have to believe in order to maintain their no-god belief system. It`s so contradictory

    *cough* right.

    @yusuksomuch I was being generous. Don`t count yourself as one of the 4.

  66. Profile photo of bananamansam
    bananamansam Male 18-29
    47 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:10 pm
    pwnd.
  67. Profile photo of CzarElad
    CzarElad Male 40-49
    28 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:12 pm
    In God We Trust.....All Others Pay Cash.
  68. Profile photo of YugureKage
    YugureKage Female 18-29
    1205 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:17 pm
    THANK YOU! Intelligence beats religious fanatics every time.
  69. Profile photo of rbt_food
    rbt_food Male 18-29
    322 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:22 pm
    The explanatory guy is a douche.
  70. Profile photo of Brian 61316
    Brian 61316 Male 18-29
    741 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:23 pm
    uber pwnd
  71. Profile photo of Altaru
    Altaru Male 18-29
    3483 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:24 pm
    Fivezones
    Mostly correct except the pledge was originally created in the September 8, 1892 issue of the popular children`s magazine The Youth`s Companion as part of the National Public-School Celebration of Columbus Day, a celebration of the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus`s arrival in the Americas (not to sell flags, which sounds retarded anyway)
    Fail.

    He was RIGHT about the flags. You`re right too, in that it did show up in the magazine, but he wasn`t wrong.

    What he WAS wrong about was the currency. "In God We Trust" started appearing in 1864, was permitted up until 1955, and in 1956 the law was passed that REQUIRED it on all currency.
  72. Profile photo of Cookie420
    Cookie420 Male 18-29
    55 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:25 pm
    i really don`t see why everyone gets into this heated `Atheist vs. Religion` bullpoo.
    Just leave it at: WE ARE dratING ATHEISTS. AND WE DON`T BELIEVE IN YOUR poo. GET THE drat OVER IT
  73. Profile photo of Slotherder
    Slotherder Male 30-39
    251 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:29 pm
    Wikipedia makes a distinction between coinage and currency; so within that distinction, the criticism is valid, at least according to Wikipedia, which cites the U.S. treasury website with a link that is broken due to website restructuring. I found the new address here: http://www.treasury.gov/about/education/Pages/in-god-we-trust.aspx
  74. Profile photo of jbwhite
    jbwhite Male 18-29
    1292 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:47 pm
    They should take all that religious bullpoo off money... and replace it with `Smoke Weed`. I think it better speaks to peace and love for all and acceptance and one-ship of the world.
  75. Profile photo of Hylian4Hire
    Hylian4Hire Female 18-29
    329 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 7:11 pm
    Shouldn`t it be "freedom FROM religious persecution", not "freedom for"?
  76. Profile photo of POPEDJoKeR
    POPEDJoKeR Male 13-17
    37 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 7:20 pm
    @ jbwhite
    sounds good, except weed can give you cancer. 3 joints are equivalent to 20 ciggerates. So by telling putting "smoke weed" on the US currency your encouraging not only a drug that is illegal in most states but is worse then tobacco. so smoke it up, you wont feel the effects.
    Sorce(s) here here and a video by WYOTK

    oh, im not trying to criticize anybody, just a lower-then-average idea.(although in hindsight he MIGHT be joking.)


    in the end though who cares? they
  77. Profile photo of SPARTAKITTY
    SPARTAKITTY Female 18-29
    2123 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 7:21 pm
    Oh snap.
  78. Profile photo of boredest1
    boredest1 Male 18-29
    556 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 7:38 pm
    Man deserves a handshake.
  79. Profile photo of keith2
    keith2 Male 18-29
    2587 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 7:43 pm
    Whatever. They should take everything off everything so everyone has nothing to complain about. Well they`ll complain about the absence of there not being anything to b.itch at.
  80. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 7:44 pm
    @PopedJoker... oh THANK your for your OH SO SCIENTIFIC *sources* in explaining your propaganda(/sarcasm) everything can give you cancer, you just have to figure out what is worth it, you wanna have fun or you wanna die trying?
  81. Profile photo of sirrix
    sirrix Male 18-29
    210 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 8:05 pm
    Seriously. I`ll vote for any president that promises to return this country to a true separation of church and state.
  82. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 8:06 pm
    @LazyMe - It is true that current science cannot explain how life came from non-life, OR how energy came from non-engery. Keyword: current! I have little doubt humans will figure it out eventually :)

    @Altaru: thanks for the further clarification, eh? It does seem like Blue got the "in God We Trust" part wrong tho. "Wasn`t added to" sounds a LOT like "wasn`t ON".

    That whole "Bellamy Salute" thing? Bullpoo of the lowest order. So WHAT if it "looks like Heil Hitler" WTF! Bellamy started it in 1892, NO NAZIS were around then! Of course in 1942 it was changed, DUH! But trying to equate Bellamy with Nazis (in 1892!) is lame-o!

    @PopedJoker: yes @jbwhite IS serious, it`s a fine idea! I know smoking weed = cancer, that`s why I inject it! I smoke heroin, like a REAL MAN!

    @SmilinSam: it`s true! fyi sand causes cancer too! If you were to eat 5-6 pounds of sand a day, for several months, 50% you`ll get stomach can
  83. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 8:11 pm
    50% chance you`ll get stomach cancer!
    Not joking, it was a real study (using rats of course, poor rats!) in California. They force-fed rats sand (not 5 pounds, that`s a human-sized dose) until half of them got cancer. It took several months. They almost BANNED "particle silicate" aka SAND in Cali! lolz!

    Yay science! SOOOO much nicer than religion.
    (I kid! I know that science, like war, can be ugly at times, but is neccessary)
  84. Profile photo of sirrix
    sirrix Male 18-29
    210 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 8:14 pm
    5cats - I work as a lawyer in a lot of cancer cases. Silicates have nothing to do with eating them, it`s breathing them you idiot. Also stop commenting on this. You live in Canada - it doesn`t affect you, notwithstanding your clearly unparalleled genius.
  85. Profile photo of last1in
    last1in Male 18-29
    260 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 8:57 pm
    point maker makes point
  86. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:00 pm
    It is true that current science cannot explain how life came from non-life, OR how energy came from non-engery.
    Nope. Energy and matter are interchangeable. I can make energy by converting a small amount of mass into it. Life on the other hand is a self-replicating non-random system which arose from clusters of chemical compounds with the ability to copy themselves which arose from the random congregation of a variety of other chemical compounds, ie, non life.

    I believe they teach you that in grade 10 science, or did you not get through high school?

  87. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    I wish I didn`t write that. I fear I might have just rattled his bars. But it`s just so easy!
  88. Profile photo of Willowwatch
    Willowwatch Female 30-39
    734 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:26 pm
    @5Cats Which study are you reffering to specifically? I`d like to read more about it.
  89. Profile photo of AtheistAlien
    AtheistAlien Male 30-39
    809 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:28 pm
    This is a bullpoo rumor that pepsi denies. 5cats is a moron and so is the guy who wants to boycott pepsi for no reason
  90. Profile photo of SeanCM
    SeanCM Male 18-29
    4 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:33 pm
    LazyMe, I agree with the energy part, but the life part not so sure, if we know thats EXACTLY how it happened...why not just replicate that again and again, im not saying that god is the almighty answer but im also not saying that science has the exact answer either
  91. Profile photo of sgibson12
    sgibson12 Male 30-39
    93 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:42 pm
    @lots of people.

    Yea.. shouldn`t have included the dumb remark. No reason to jab unnecessarily. My points were threefold.
    1) It`s inappropriate to turn every conversation into a major debate. This thread is one. That was not. He answered a series of one liners with a 5 paragraph rebuttal essay. That`s annoying in any and all situations regardless of context.
    2) Yes, I assumed (possibly incorrectly) that the person is an atheist. Given the tone, I think it`s highly likely.
    3) @whocares3725. That`s not venom, that`s bunk. Given the facts that we know right now, life always comes from life, and energy always dissipates. These are the huge missing pieces. Where did life come from? Where did the energy, matter, and movement of all things come from? It can`t just start by itself. To believe that life, energy, matter were created all on their own is in direct conflict with everything we know about science. This doesn`t prove God outright, but necessitates something a-natu
  92. Profile photo of I-IS-BORED
    I-IS-BORED Male 18-29
    2419 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:11 pm
    oh USA, still stuck on Comte stage 1 I see?
  93. Profile photo of docluke
    docluke Male 18-29
    9 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:12 pm
    Somewhere, out there, are people who think that making different choices in the brand of soda they purchase will get them closer to God. Im a self-proclaimed `religious fanatic` and please don`t group me in with these people
  94. Profile photo of Qwertyuiop95
    Qwertyuiop95 Male 18-29
    215 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:22 pm
    I`m copying that for the next time I need to say something like that.
  95. Profile photo of Painter13
    Painter13 Male 40-49
    1370 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:31 pm
    Thermodynamics is a lie? Wow.. if you do not believe the easiest thing in science to prove as an absolute.... then you are f#cked..really. Energy does not die..it is transitional, and even in transition, unless absolute zero -479.5 degrees, there is molecular action in all elements..even rocks will have conductive heat transfer taking place.
  96. Profile photo of BiGpHiL
    BiGpHiL Male 18-29
    261 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:52 pm
    everything governemental related should be Secular
  97. Profile photo of PoopNoodle
    PoopNoodle Male 40-49
    400 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:54 pm
    Wow!
  98. Profile photo of Wildcats2008
    Wildcats2008 Male 18-29
    237 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:49 pm
    I love how every time this kind of issue comes up someone says something about freedom of religion.

    Here`s something to think about: All major religions believe in God is some form or another with the exception of Buddhism and atheism (which are the only two I can think of off the top of my head). No where do the statements "under God" or "In God we trust" do they refer to the Christian God.

    BTW, the establishment clause specifically states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" meaning that Congress can establish no church and cannot prevent you from practicing your own religion. Again, all these statements do no refer to any specific god or gods and it doesn`t prohibit you from worshiping how you feel led.

    Now while this may be true, I do personally believe that any god other than the God of the Bible is false but anyone else has the right to worship who th
  99. Profile photo of Buiadh
    Buiadh Male 30-39
    6739 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:53 pm
    Damn right
  100. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25406 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:57 pm
    lol
  101. Profile photo of auntiemeg32
    auntiemeg32 Female 18-29
    20 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:22 am
    It`s not about freedom OF religion, it`s about freedom FROM religion.
  102. Profile photo of joosen52
    joosen52 Male 18-29
    206 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:27 am
    I gotta buy some pepsi
  103. Profile photo of ZefSoFresh
    ZefSoFresh Male 18-29
    52 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:54 am
    @Wildcats- You quoted it yourself.."Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". Passing a law and spending taxpayer money
    on a belief of ANY invisible man in the sky is an establishment of religion.(definition of religion-A strong belief in supernatural powers or powers that control human destiny.) You have the right to believe what you want, but leave my government and tax dollars out of it.
  104. Profile photo of Serpentchick
    Serpentchick Female 18-29
    379 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:06 am
    http://genetics.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/resources.html Here, info on how life started. From non-life.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
    Conservation of energy. Basic law of physics.
    And I`m sure you`ve heard of the "Big Bang". Enough to know how to look it up yourself, though as it involves very complex astrophysics, that we are still investigating.
  105. Profile photo of ZefSoFresh
    ZefSoFresh Male 18-29
    52 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:20 am
    @Wildcats2008-To be more concise"Congress shall make no law respecting the (belief in supernatural beings)" Written by our Forefathers.Endorsement of "In god we trust",any god, still violates this. (p.s. I love when people bring this up,too! tee-hee.;),good try though!
  106. Profile photo of Corpsecrank
    Corpsecrank Male 30-39
    930 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:26 am
    Ever wonder what it would look like if you could punch someone in the face through a keyboard long distance? Look no further because this is exactly what it looks like.
  107. Profile photo of Wildcats2008
    Wildcats2008 Male 18-29
    237 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:27 am
    ZefSoFresh - Your definition of a religion isn`t completely correct. From dictionary.com, out of the 6 main definitions 5 of them said something to the effect of "a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects". A religion does not necessarily have to involve what you call an invisible man in the sky.

    When the founding fathers said that Congress can`t establish a religion, their aim was to protect against a similar situation like the Church of England.

    Is putting those words on money or in the Pledge creating a religion in which government is the head..I think not. Is it inhibiting you from practicing your own religion, most likely not. I think it passes the Establishment Clause test.

    I`ll leave you with this. Everyone worships something, whether it be God, what you call an invisible man in the sky, money, celebrities, nature. There is something in everyone`s life that is sacred and holds
  108. Profile photo of Dad4Life
    Dad4Life Male 50-59
    2067 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:37 am
    Allegedly just a rumor, but I would not put it past Pepsi to do something like that.
  109. Profile photo of T-Marley
    T-Marley Male 70 & Over
    602 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:54 am
    Not nearly as cool since he is the one who took the screen shot... I mean...egotistical much? Coming from me that`s quite a statement.
  110. Profile photo of limphotdog
    limphotdog Female 18-29
    673 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 2:36 am
    lol @ flame war.

    This site should NEVER be taken seriously.

    But I s`pose feeling passionately serious about something on the internet is better than being bored. :-P
  111. Profile photo of outdoorMINER
    outdoorMINER Female 18-29
    934 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 3:07 am
    The comments are far more entertaining than the catual post. I live for the flame wars!
  112. Profile photo of SmagBoy1
    SmagBoy1 Male 40-49
    4432 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 3:36 am
    Hey, the way I see it, it`s fine to believe in something, and it`s fine for someone else to believe in the opposite. The only problem is when one person`s beliefs hurt other people.

    The posts highlighted from Mr./Ms. Black`s FB page are just opinions. The fact that Mr./Ms. Blue was very clear and concise and based his/her entry on facts, rather than rumor, can`t be disputed. But neither can the fact that Mr./Ms. Black posted what he/she did due to his/her beliefs. Neither post was overtly nasty and both presented beliefs that can, yawn, obviously be supported through lots of yelling and gesticulation (just look at this thread).

    Personally, I`ll go with actual, verifiable facts every time. So, if you post something publicly and make it open for comment, and if you want *my* support for your idea (like a product boycott), fact check what you`re saying, or, caveat it by saying it`s opinion (rather than stating it as fact). That`s not difficult, is it?
  113. Profile photo of margot138
    margot138 Female 18-29
    322 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 4:08 am
    Heh I like that blue person
  114. Profile photo of K0ttin_K0b
    K0ttin_K0b Female 18-29
    98 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 4:17 am
    The facts of it really had nothing to do with the first post. Good observations, though. Really, if they loved God so much and professed to be Christian They would have nothing to do with human nations. They would be neutral like Jesus was. Funny pic.
  115. Profile photo of K0ttin_K0b
    K0ttin_K0b Female 18-29
    98 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 4:20 am
    And likewise, the nations should have nothing to do with religion. It fuels controversy and anger.
  116. Profile photo of FatWreck
    FatWreck Male 13-17
    10 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 4:44 am
    If you believe in Jesus then you believe in unicorns.
  117. Profile photo of Sidragasum
    Sidragasum Male 18-29
    169 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 5:23 am
    Told.
  118. Profile photo of Lord_Jereth
    Lord_Jereth Male 40-49
    725 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 5:32 am
    Wouldn`t it just be nicer to live in a country that`s "OVER God?" - as in, "We`re sooooo over it."

    Can I get a AMEN!

    8-) LJ
  119. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 5:37 am
    I work as a lawyer... Silicates have nothing to do with eating them
    @sirrix - did I SAY they did? No, I said the study I saw said that. In the experiment the rats were force-fed the sand. Plz to learn to read before you make a bigger fool of yourself.

    @lazyme - you just said you can make energy FROM energy, m-kay? For the Big Bang it`s energy from a vacuum, can we do that? nope, not yet! As for life, our intelligence can design things that seem life-like, but the odds of observing random life creation are so small as to practically BE zero. (intelligence, design, see what I did there? Just rattling your cage! lolz!)

    They taught us a lot of CRAP in grade 10 science, you believed it all? Magnets bro! wtf!

    Sorry @WillowWatch, it was many years ago. I just remember the State wanted to treat sandblaster sand as hazerdous waste!
  120. Profile photo of TheBLB
    TheBLB Male 18-29
    239 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 6:10 am
    @FatWreck

    not many historians disagree with the statement "Jesus was a person who existed"... but good attempt at being awesome.
  121. Profile photo of TheSpoon
    TheSpoon Male 18-29
    212 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 6:35 am
    "If you believe in Jesus then you believe in unicorns."

    Was Jesus a unicorn then?
  122. Profile photo of Canoas
    Canoas Male 18-29
    427 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 6:35 am
    @5cats
    maybe you should have paid attention to that class. the Big Bang theory never stated that energy was created. As any 12 year old knows, it states that there was a extremely condensed and hot piece of matter than quickly expanded and cooled down.
    How did the matter exist in the first place? No idea. But then again, how did god came into existence? You can`t answer it either.
    Also, what are the odds of randomly creating life in how much time? If it`s in 5 seconds, then yes, it`s practically zero. If it`s randomly creating life in 5 billion years then it is very likely, as it just after 1.5 billion years life appeared on earth.
    Since you believe it`s a load of crap then let me ask you this. Somewhere during the 1960s (forgot the exact date) it was observed that a bacteria was feeding on nylon. Now, if nylon was produced in 1935 then it means that bacteria could have not existed prior to that event. Did god actually created a new type of bacteria JUST to eat nylon or
  123. Profile photo of CJ-Boy-2010
    CJ-Boy-2010 Male 13-17
    384 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 6:44 am
    @POPEDJoKeR
    I lol`d, you sure have been brainwashed. Oddly enough cannabis has been proven to do the healthy opposites of everything it was believed to do: it has anti-carcinogenic properties(reduces tumors in lungs and even cures melanoma), instead of damaging the airway, it acts as a bronchodilator, and instead of killing every neuron it actually promotes brain cell growth.

    Wow, better get informed next time!
    http:// boards.cannabis.com /medicinal-cannabis-health /161539-granny-storm-crows-list .html
  124. Profile photo of FatWreck
    FatWreck Male 13-17
    10 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 6:52 am
    @TheBLB & TheSpoon

    King James Bible says unicorn I believe 9 times.
    New living Bible changed unicorn to wild ox.
    That`s what I meant.
  125. Profile photo of DixxyRarr
    DixxyRarr Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 7:17 am
    Makes me want a Crystal Pepsi.
  126. Profile photo of Pheeshy5
    Pheeshy5 Male 18-29
    1312 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 7:58 am
    That guy straight up bitch slapped those turds with knowledge!
  127. Profile photo of Siora
    Siora Male 18-29
    221 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:01 am
    You can believe whatever you like, no problems with that. But it doesn`t mean it`s the right answer.
  128. Profile photo of TwoEyezBlind
    TwoEyezBlind Male 18-29
    483 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:03 am
    I`m not reading this trash. I came on IAB for some form of entertainment, not a history lesson.
  129. Profile photo of handimanner
    handimanner Male 60-69
    2095 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:12 am
    Coke or Pepsi. What would Jesus drink? (eh, probably water)
  130. Profile photo of Uthrax
    Uthrax Male 30-39
    77 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:24 am
    @handimanner wine actually
  131. Profile photo of Zed68
    Zed68 Male 40-49
    1015 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:30 am
    Blam ! Headshot !!
  132. Profile photo of meepmaker
    meepmaker Male 30-39
    6694 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:57 am
    Bazinga !
  133. Profile photo of GRadde
    GRadde Male 18-29
    2556 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:57 am
    Haha, that`s a brilliant answer. Loved it!
  134. Profile photo of Quackor
    Quackor Male 18-29
    2856 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:01 am
    Jesus was a wine drinker
  135. Profile photo of sssfdg
    sssfdg Male 18-29
    190 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:04 am
    Boo Ya!!! so well said.
  136. Profile photo of edana42
    edana42 Female 50-59
    2509 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:24 am
    bahahahaha I love facts! no matter whose side they fall on...
  137. Profile photo of kusanagi
    kusanagi Male 18-29
    183 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:27 am
    ...multikill...
  138. Profile photo of draquoir
    draquoir Male 18-29
    1052 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:32 am
    blue guy is the man.
  139. Profile photo of Wizensilver
    Wizensilver Male 13-17
    405 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:33 am
    POW, SIT BACK DOWN.
    :D
  140. Profile photo of pootio
    pootio Male 18-29
    106 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:40 am
    Since when can you leave comments that long? I call shenanigans
  141. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 10:52 am
    How did the matter exist in the first place?
    Um, that is the whole point I am making here, eh?
    No idea. - @Canoas
    I`m gald you agree with me.

    what are the odds of randomly creating life in how much time?
    Well, since I`d already blathered on for several posts, I decided to NOT expand on that, thinking IABers would be able to understand it. Apparently... not.
    I said "us to OBSERVE" spontanious life, NOT THAT IT NEVER HAPPENED -IDIOT- ! Yes it took BILLIONS of years, and ech year there were probably TRILLIONS of `chances` that didn`t turn out. What are the odds of WE HUMANS actually viewing it? ZILCH!
    Since you believe it`s a load of crap...
    Nope, never said that. In fact I stated the opposite: it DID happen, we just don`t (currently) understand how.
    The `nylon thing`?? ZOMG that`s evolution. ZOMG I`m being trolled by an idiot!
  142. Profile photo of dukorider1
    dukorider1 Male 18-29
    210 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 10:58 am
    If anyone dares to post TL DNR after this noble man`s epic post, that would kill it.
  143. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 11:47 am
    if we know thats EXACTLY how it happened...why not just replicate that again and again
    I didn`t say we know exactly how it happened. I`m saying we know the theory, the conditions, the results... We`ve simulated abiogenesis on computers, we`ve created artificial life not found anywhere else. I`d say we have a pretty good idea of how it happened.

    So what do you want? A correct answer that`s pretty damn close and good enough for whatever purpose you want to put that knowledge to in your life or a ridiculously wrong answer that`s EXACT?
  144. Profile photo of TBWRB
    TBWRB Male 18-29
    50 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:08 pm
    Pledging yourself to a nation (or by my reckoning a president, king or emporer) is a very fuedal thing to do.

    I wouldn`t do it myself, so I wouldn`t call on any of you to do the same.

    Please don`t bother with the rage, I`m just being objective.
  145. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:08 pm
    you just said you can make energy FROM energy
    Nope. I said you can make energy from matter, but you can make it from energy too, sure...
    Big Bang it`s energy from a vacuum
    Nope. It`s energy and matter from a singularity point - not nothing. Beyond that? Short answer - impossible to know, long answer - several theories... oscillating universe, a bud from parent universe, multiverse... leave it to the cosmologists.
    our intelligence can design things that seem life-like
    Inaccurate. We have created unique species (not simulations, actual life that can`t be found anywhere else)
    the odds of observing random life creation are so small as to practically BE zero
    Nope. If they were "practically" zero, then we wouldn`t exist, as existence is practical. Observing it is arbitrary. You just have to be there.
  146. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:11 pm
    I`m not surprised you don`t believe in magnets. It seems like the sort of thing that would interfere with one`s life, practically. Try placing a magnet on your HDD, maybe god will save your data from corrupting.
  147. Profile photo of Baphometa
    Baphometa Male 18-29
    70 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 12:16 pm
    HDD actually have 2 very strong magnets in them already the chances of you placing a magnet on a HDD and it corrupting the data is very very slim it would have to be a electro magnet and a very high powered one at that and even then im doubtful it would do anything to the data the damage would likely occur from misalignment of components being pulled on by the magnetic force
  148. Profile photo of CoyoteKing
    CoyoteKing Male 18-29
    2988 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:41 pm
    i wish they would get rid of both the "under god" and "in god we trust" bullpoo. its not needed, makes us look bad and is offensive to us non-christians
  149. Profile photo of Qwertyuiop95
    Qwertyuiop95 Male 18-29
    215 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:47 pm
    I`m copying that for the next time I need to say something like that.
  150. Profile photo of Mckinneysgay
    Mckinneysgay Male 18-29
    153 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 2:07 pm
    no prayer for seven days, makes one weak.

    sorry for that.
  151. Profile photo of missPWNAGE
    missPWNAGE Female 18-29
    298 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 2:25 pm
    nice. pwned. :D
  152. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 2:52 pm
    @LazyMe, don`t you recall the Nobel Prize winng guy explaining to us that physicists CANNOT "explain WHY magnets work"? We know the other Ws; How? yup, when where who? yuppers! Why? um... don`t know! Because it`s a fundimental force, it just IS.
    @Lzyme again the math (without bad quote endings, I was late for work!) it took 5 Billion years for spontanious life to happen on Earth (see? not arguing with you!) so the odds of humans "observing" it happening again are: 1 in 5 billion YEARS, assuming we even know where to look! Which we don`t!
    Oh we have several guesses, but NOT 5 BILLION YEARS!! So the odds over 5 billion years may be good, but really? You think Humans will be around for that long?
    Chances = Zilch!
  153. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31764 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 3:02 pm
    Read what I wrote dude: the odds of us OBSERVING it, not the "odds it ever happened" eh?

    If we create life in the lab, it`s NOT "spontaneous" it`s intelligently designed & doesn`t count. Assuming humans qualify as "intelligent" eh? (see: fail videos)

    As for the Big Bang: short answer = impossible to know. That`s exactly what I said! We don`t (currently) know! It doesn`t mean I think it didn`t happen. Dude, you`re projecting! (not nearly as much as @Canoas tho, lolz!)
  154. Profile photo of darkhawk
    darkhawk Male 70 & Over
    260 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 4:23 pm
    love the comeback on the religious morons :D
  155. Profile photo of Solvent
    Solvent Male 18-29
    2842 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 5:12 pm
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people.
  156. Profile photo of danky
    danky Male 18-29
    559 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:03 pm
    i aint even mad
  157. Profile photo of Vipablaz
    Vipablaz Male 13-17
    191 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 8:49 pm
    My favorite part of this is the fact that the guy who made the comment was so proud of himself (assuming he changed the colour for everyone who commented including himself) that he took a screenshot and uploaded it to IAB
  158. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 9:54 pm
    Miracle on 34th Street lied to me!
  159. Profile photo of shalantas
    shalantas Male 18-29
    426 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 10:30 pm
    if i woulda wrote this there woulda been like 400 likes... and i only have like 57 friends so...
  160. Profile photo of BunnyNaku
    BunnyNaku Female 18-29
    5224 posts
    April 1, 2011 at 1:10 am
    like
  161. Profile photo of NexusLetum
    NexusLetum Female 18-29
    136 posts
    April 1, 2011 at 8:58 am
    @Vipablaz Not really, the mods on failbooking have that format. And that is where this image is from.
  162. Profile photo of catbarf
    catbarf Male 18-29
    1455 posts
    April 1, 2011 at 11:18 am
    "My favorite part of this is the fact that the guy who made the comment was so proud of himself (assuming he changed the colour for everyone who commented including himself) that he took a screenshot and uploaded it to IAB"

    Considering it shows the actual time of that comment, and not `10 seconds ago` or somesuch, I doubt it`s the same person.
  163. Profile photo of FCMXD
    FCMXD Male 18-29
    181 posts
    April 1, 2011 at 3:32 pm
    So now that I don`t have to boycott Pepsi because they`re removing "under god", I can go back to boycotting Pepsi because it`s Pepsi.

    Thanks, iab!
  164. Profile photo of LuckyDave
    LuckyDave Male 18-29
    675 posts
    April 1, 2011 at 11:45 pm
    ZING
  165. Profile photo of Padiddle
    Padiddle Female 13-17
    192 posts
    April 2, 2011 at 4:08 pm
    pwned
  166. Profile photo of PfulHouse
    PfulHouse Male 30-39
    371 posts
    April 3, 2011 at 4:19 am

    Wikipedia for the win...

    :/
  167. Profile photo of TIMESWORDSMN
    TIMESWORDSMN Male 13-17
    304 posts
    April 4, 2011 at 2:35 pm
    I don`t hate Pepsi because on a limited can line they omitted an unimportant part of an unimportant pledge! I hate Pepsi because it`s Pepsi, and Pepsi sucks.
  168. Profile photo of SkyeDragon
    SkyeDragon Female 18-29
    281 posts
    April 5, 2011 at 4:53 pm
    I love Pepsi. :3
  169. Profile photo of SpiorSoul
    SpiorSoul Female 13-17
    6 posts
    April 5, 2011 at 11:23 pm
    Am I a bad Christian for agreeing with the last comment?
    No. Nor am I a retarded Christian.
  170. Profile photo of goatfudge
    goatfudge Male 30-39
    2 posts
    April 9, 2011 at 9:44 am
    I hate god and pepsi equally
  171. Profile photo of Qwertyuiop95
    Qwertyuiop95 Male 18-29
    215 posts
    May 27, 2011 at 9:16 pm
    I`m copying that for the next time I need to say something like that.
  172. Profile photo of Qwertyuiop95
    Qwertyuiop95 Male 18-29
    215 posts
    August 17, 2011 at 2:31 pm
    I`m copying that for the next time I need to say something like that.

Leave a Reply