Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 44    Average: 3.1/5]
68 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 16020
Rating: 3.1
Category:
Date: 03/30/11 10:02 AM

68 Responses to Associated Press Fact Checks Obama`s Address

  1. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:02 am
    Link: Associated Press Fact Checks Obama`s Address - Finds few facts! Notes how Obama`s positions have `changed` since becoming POTUS!
  2. Profile photo of clever-chan
    clever-chan Female 18-29
    345 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:20 am
    Wow... a president that talks out of his ass! That never happens.... Did anyone REALLY expect anything different out of Obama? REALLY?
  3. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:30 am
    Bullpoo comes from both sides of the aisle. It`s all the same crap and none of it can be trusted. I`ve seriously considered no longer voting because it just doesn`t make a lick of a difference.
  4. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:39 am
    Refused to pursue war crimes of the previous administration, dropped the public option, left medical insurance monopoly in place, indefinite detention, expanded the war in Afghanistan, renewed Bush tax cuts, and now he illegally starts a 3rd war when our country is in dire economic straights. I dread having to choose between this idiot and the nut job the Tea Party puts up in 2012.
  5. Profile photo of handimanner
    handimanner Male 60-69
    2095 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:40 am
    Anyone wanna try to do a better job? How would George handle it?
    Really a lame approach to critisism. As mentioned by Woodward that we`re not privy to all the info. I`m not a huge Obama fan, but certainly can`t see the bs coming out of Gindrich as better. Obama got stuck with the neocon`s wars and reality has proved exits to be difficult. I believe that military use is a waste of money and the MAIN reason that bucks are in short, concentrated supply. That said, Ghaddafi is a tyrant, has attacked the US several times (Lockerbie, German nightclub) and if, by protecting civilians in that country is a convenient way of ridding the world of him, so be it.
  6. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:41 am
    While I do support our involvement (so far) in Libya, I really do think this `terminology` is completely absurd.

    Even Jon Stewart thinks it`s ridiculous.
  7. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12151 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:41 am
    *Reads description. Clicks link to see who submitter was. Yep, 5Cats*
  8. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:44 am
    @Zombunny: I LOVE that defense of Obama!
    When Bush talked smack = Republicans are stupid
    When Obama talks smack = Both sides talk smack, eh?
    LOL!
    @NottaSpy: Don`t forget keeping Guantanomo open, forbidding Stemcell research (Obama re-signed the exact same bill as Bush which forbids Federal Stemcell funding) and picking NCAA rather than asking Congress for permission to goto war (as is required by the constitution, eh?)
    Funny Cartoon
  9. Profile photo of vegascartman
    vegascartman Male 30-39
    735 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:52 am
    This actually is a shock to anyone that Obama is a lying, hypocritical douchebag? This is just another day in the Obama White House. Nothing new here, move along...
  10. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:52 am
    Main complaint about Obama from the left: He`s too far right.
    Main complaint about Obama from the right: HE AGREED WITH US! HA HOW MUCH DOES THAT SUCK LIBS! (Oh, btw he`s too far left.... *cough*)
  11. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 10:56 am
    @handimanner, that is your defense of Obama? That the loony tunes Republicans would do worse? You seem to forget that Obama asked for the job. I don`t find it unreasonable to expect him not to shred the Constitution at every turn.
  12. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:02 am
    @5Cats, I wasn`t aware that you had a record of things I said when Bush was in office. Back then I said the same thing. It`s all BS. My opinion hasn`t changed. Nice try though. Some people might use that excuse to defend Obama but don`t lump me in with them if you don`t know me.
  13. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:03 am
    And for the record, if I vote at all in the next election, it won`t be for Obama.
  14. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:08 am
    Oh and since I now know that you keep records of everything I`ve said in the past, can you tell me what I said that one night in `07 when I drank a fifth of whiskey and accidentally sliced my hand open on the broken bottle? I don`t remember but my ex is still mad at me for it.
  15. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:14 am
    I stopped voting 12 years ago. No regrets on that
  16. Profile photo of TruTenrMan
    TruTenrMan Male 30-39
    2553 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:21 am
    Obama, how does it feel to be the one NOBEL PEACE PRIZE recipient responsible for launching the most missiles at another country? LOL
  17. Profile photo of TopperHey
    TopperHey Male 18-29
    1930 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:23 am
    Quote from Obama --> Man says something related
    Quote from Obama --> Man says something related
    Quote from Obama --> Man says something related

    What the hell was the point of that??
  18. Profile photo of meepmaker
    meepmaker Male 30-39
    6694 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:25 am
    Ditto.

    zombunny
    Female, 18-29, Eastern US
    880 Posts Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:03:27 AM
    And for the record, if I vote at all in the next election, it won`t be for Obama.
  19. Profile photo of DoubleSteve
    DoubleSteve Male 30-39
    34 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:25 am
    Wow, he`s got to be the first president who`s changed his stance on something after getting elected. History in the making.
  20. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:29 am
    Incidentally, taking a random example:
    Guantanamo.

    President: Executive Order to close Guantanamo in Jan 2009. One of the first things he did. Republicans: Held it up, but before that they pushed it into the spending bill the Dems wanted to pass before reps came into power in the house because they knew they`d get away with it.

    "Don`t forget keeping Guantanamo open". Oh I won`t, however, do pay attention to why that is. It`s not Obama.
  21. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:32 am
    zombunny is awesome!
  22. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:39 am
    @Baalthazaq, Guantanamo is just a symbol and a campaign promise. Indefinite detention is why Guantanamo is a symbol, and Obama has stated that he plans to indefinitely detain people even after Guantanamo is closed. Broken promise vs violating the Constitution.
  23. Profile photo of MaximumTroll
    MaximumTroll Male 18-29
    37 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:41 am
    This video has nothing to do w/ Obama changing any views. He`s explaining his stance on Libya, and he told the truth the whole time. With so much to attack the Democrats with you people can`t find one fact? Are you that stupid?
  24. Profile photo of MaximumTroll
    MaximumTroll Male 18-29
    37 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:43 am
    By the looks of the comments on here, its mostly old people who dislike the President. Can`t break away from your pent up racism? You people and the rest of the fiction writers at Fox News can just go find a different country, you can`t ruin ours.
  25. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:43 am
    forbidding Stemcell research (Obama re-signed the exact same bill as Bush which forbids Federal Stemcell funding).
    ------------
    You don`t know what you`re talking about. Obama tried to expand stem cell research but a federal judge put a hold on it.
    Just another point of your ignorance light.
  26. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 11:57 am
    @MaximumTroll, since 5Cats and I are the only old people here criticizing the President, you must me talking about me. Was it when I said "the nut job the Tea Party puts up" or when I said "the loony tunes Republicans" that gave you the idea that I was a Faux News viewer? I voted for Obama and supported him early on, so I must recently converted to being a racist. Because there is no evidence that I have actual disagreements with his policies, like I put in my first post. You are a 1st class idiot and the only thing you got right in your post is that I`m old.
  27. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:10 pm
    Obama has went back on so many promises now, he makes "No new taxes", by Bush 41 look like a little fib.
  28. Profile photo of xiquiripat
    xiquiripat Male 18-29
    2423 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:14 pm
    I don`t see what is so hard to figure out. We shut down the air-force and air defenses so we can fly missions with impunity. Then we focused on command and control so Qaddafi won`t be able to effectively use his army. Then we started on interdiction and close support on those armies to soften them up for the rebels so they can move on to Tripoli. THEY ARE OUR ARMY ON THE GROUND. This is right from Warden`s playbook. Of course, they haven`t said this, but it is the direction they are moving in given that they`ve already moved in A-10s and AC-130s.
  29. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25408 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:29 pm
    meh
  30. Profile photo of Grendel
    Grendel Male 40-49
    5877 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:31 pm
    And the award for first use of the "Race Card goes to: MaximumTroll!!


    Because Obama’s political philosophy is automatically ‘Correct’ and anyone disagreeing with it is ‘Racist’, right?

    Face it, he`s a pitiful failure in the office and your `Race Card` account has been maxed out. You`ve used it so much that it means exactly...crap.
  31. Profile photo of davidildo123
    davidildo123 Male 40-49
    143 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:43 pm
    MeGrendel: Did you actually respond to someone who calls himself, "Maximum Troll"? You do realize he is a troll, don`t you? Hint, read his name again. He knows people are not being racist, he is trolling. Get it?

    It is funny though to see the Obamaphiles sticking up for him. Yes, he lied. Get over it. Obama is a piece of S- politician, just like the rest of them. He lies and people dies.
  32. Profile photo of yusuksomuch
    yusuksomuch Male 40-49
    1008 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:46 pm
    I LOVE ME SOME OBAMA! HE`S A PIMP AND YOU ALL ARE NOT!

    ps you guys rock for finding a way to get foxnews into this lmfao THANKS!
  33. Profile photo of greenbasterd
    greenbasterd Male 18-29
    2377 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 12:54 pm
    always beleive the bald guy with a mustach!
  34. Profile photo of bowlweb
    bowlweb Male 40-49
    4 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 1:09 pm
    Oh, ad-DRESS.

    I thought maybe some `residenters` had a recent electric bill that PROVED he doesn`t really live at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. or something.
  35. Profile photo of rogue_knight
    rogue_knight Male 40-49
    868 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 1:15 pm
    He`s black, he`s white, yeah yeah yeah...
    Either or both he`s a failure!
  36. Profile photo of MildCorma
    MildCorma Male 18-29
    496 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 1:37 pm
    i love how this reporter is completely non-biased and objective, like all reporters should be. It`s good to see he`s not, you know, saying that basically the US controls NATO because that would be completely un-true. It would be a falsehood, a non-truth, being reported as a fact, which is completely not what has happened here at all.
  37. Profile photo of Milo_Pretzel
    Milo_Pretzel Female 18-29
    180 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 3:26 pm
    I<3Brobama.
  38. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 3:45 pm
    Obama does not want to reduce military spending? Ha! Pandering to republicans I think. He`s failed so far as I can see.
  39. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 3:48 pm
    vv Sorry @zombunny, if it wasn`t poitical my servailance team delets the video & audio... and the GPS records... and the biometric data... (j/k!)
    I meant it as "that" not "your" as in "that`s what Dems are always saying" It was my lunchbreak, had to type fast!
    Not that you`re a Dem, just a lefty, afaik.
  40. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 3:56 pm
    "Republicans held it up..."
    @Baalth, you`ve REALY lost your mind this time!
    #1 The DEMS had buster-proof majorities in BOTH houses in Jan 2009, exactly HOW did Reps "hold up" anything? How did THEY move any bill when ALL bills were controled by Pelosi & Reid?
    #2 You mention Obama`s 2009 bill, but link an article from June 2010. Since he PROMISED to close Gitmo in ONE YEAR how is that even remotely related?
    #3 Your SECOND LINK is from Dec 2010, where the Dems are "lame ducks" and yes the Reps have some say in what goes where. AGAIN I ask you: how does something 23 MONTHS after his promise of 12 MONTHS change the fact that he "hope & changed" his mind?
    Baalth: BLAME THE REPUBLICANS! (repeat ad nausium)
  41. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:04 pm
    (takes screenshot of Baalthy`s FAIL before it gets deleted...)
  42. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:07 pm
    I knew this was submitted by 5cats before I even opened the comments. what do i win!? and on an unrelated note... the whole government is one big f*ckaroo why do we consistently blame one person for the actions of many? oh yeah, because it is easiest. it is simple to have one scapegoat and into it place all your hopes/fears/aggression, than to hold accountable the hundreds of congressmen and senators and state representatives that consistently make terrible laws and pass bills that give money to big businesses and bottleneck the CHANGE that everyone who actually VOTED for Obama HOPED for. But let’s not bring them into the limelight. Let’s just let them continue to do what they’ve always done. Get reelected year after year and continue to propagate the f*ckery that is our national government.I’m not sayin he’s perfect, I’m not sayin he hasn’t broken some promises. I am however, sayin that I would love to see any one of you do any better.
  43. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:07 pm
    But you won’t. Because you like complaining. And because it’s impossible. We can’t get over our stupid idealistic divides to see the big picture. Neither can the politicians. AND They’ve got their heads stuck so far up the lobbyists asses that they probably will never see the light again. We need fresh blood in government. We need new ideas and less divide. We need to abolish the two party system. We need a lot of things but we aren’t going to get them. Not as long as those who are in power remain in power. Obama is one cog in a big wheel in a big machine that’s running our nation into the ground. Granted he is the most visible figure, required to make speeches and promises, but he’s nothing but the mask on the beast. I wish more people would start to talk about the rest of the government too… but they won’t. because it’s easy to point fingers, but not so easy to suggest solutions.
  44. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:11 pm
    You don`t know what you`re talking about. Obama tried to expand stem cell research but a federal judge put a hold on it.
    Just another point of your ignorance light.

    @madest is it ever possible you might, just one time, disagree with me without adding a personal insult? It belittles both you and your arguement, eh?
    (NOTE: in before @madest cries: "you just insulted ME!!!!@!!" No I did not. I pointed out the effect his insult has on whomever reads it, not anything personal about him, m-kay?)

    Meanwhile reality remains: 4 days after his famous "signing a bill that supports stemcell research" he re-signed the exact same bill Bush signed which the MSM raged over: that which refused Fed funding for many forms of SSR.
    Perhaps the `judge` you mentioned was refering to THAT BILL which OBAMA HIMSELF re-signed, eh? Ever think of that @madest?
  45. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:14 pm
    I knew this was submitted by 5cats before I even opened the comments. what do i win!?

    @SmilinSam - You win a fabulous, all expenses paid (by you) DATE WITH @DAVYMID!!!! yayayaya!
    (and good news! he puts out on the first date, eh?)
    lolz!
  46. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:23 pm
    Cat5, President Obama did not "re-sign" Bush`s ban on stem cell research. You stated he did as if it were fact. The fact is, Obama issued an executive order expanding stem cell research and subsequently, federal judge Royce C. Lamberth issued a temporary injunction stopping it.
    The personal insult was justified because you act like an expert on American politics which is absurd on it`s face because you`re not from here and don`t understand American politics. Besides that it`s fun.
  47. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:24 pm
    (back to seriously mode)
    vv I agree with you @SmilinSam:
    Big Government = clusterf*ck
    And there`s nearly zilch any single human being can do about it, even if he/she is POTUS!

    BUT in this one case: Obama is 100% personally responsible. HE gave the order, HE didn`t ask Congress, HE made NCAA picks rather than explain himself to the American People.

    Normally I`d agree that the POTUS is mostly a figurehead, but there are some things the Prez can do, or chose to not do, which could make a difference in `the way things are`.

    When Bush signed the Big Government Bailout, he could have chosen to "veto" it, but he didn`t. I called him a knucklehead for his cowardice! (and several other words that rhyme with `drat`)
  48. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:28 pm
    @madest you clearly know nothing on this subject:
    A Presidential Mandate must be re-signed by each new president to continue. Bush signed a PM, it was not a law passed by the houses. They COULD overturn it, with 2/3 vote I think, but they didn`t.
    All Obama had to do was NOT sign that bill and *poof* it`s gone! Of course the next Pres could re-sign it and *poof* it`s back!
    If you make me go dig up the article (which is several years old now) I shall expect the prize @SmilinSam just won, only with YOU and YOU`RE paying for it!

    Self-justification: the victory of fools...
  49. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:32 pm
    you`re not from here and don`t understand American politics.
    Oh, and I suppose all those forign Unversity Professors who teach such things "don`t know nothing about us `Maricans" neither? You`re fail is "just another point of your ignorance light" eh?
    Wait, WTF does that even mean?????
  50. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 4:33 pm
    It`s called an executive order. Proving once again you`re ignorant about American politics.
  51. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:04 pm
    great minds think alike, unfortunate as that is :-P
  52. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:47 pm
    PM, EO, _W_ @madest. At least you know (now!) that I am 100% correct!
  53. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 5:52 pm
    Ah how when ones turns president they get caught in the `Good old boy system" No matter what party.
  54. Profile photo of Durrell
    Durrell Male 18-29
    136 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:01 pm
    Woah on the first one, they handed over command to NATO and effectively to the Canadians as the general in command is now a Canadian General.
  55. Profile photo of Dad4Life
    Dad4Life Male 50-59
    2067 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:29 pm
    He is a hypocritical, lying, socialist piece of garbage.
  56. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:36 pm
    @Durrell
    yes under a Canadian Commander. However the bulk of the logistics still is from American firepower with final authority under that fleets commanders decision making. As it is with England`s and Frances fleet commanders decision as well. Plus a huge chunk of change out of US taxpayers dollars. BTW which we really don`t have to spend. Perchance since you got a sh*t load of oil. Why don`t Canada just fund this whole show yourselves this time around. Tell you what I`ll find a Canadian around here and buy them a drink for thanks. That should cover it.
  57. Profile photo of OutWest
    OutWest Male 50-59
    546 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 6:53 pm
    LOL... Cats is on a roll. This "Executive Decision" was just what he needed.

    It is fun to see how many of us here, wouldn`t cross the aisle for a fact. And we wonder why our political leaders can`t get anything accomplished in a bi-partisan manner.

    Keep it coming Cats... love it when Politicians are exposed as marketing managers for their party.
  58. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 8:28 pm
    ...they handed over command to NATO and effectively to the Canadians as the general in command is now a Canadian General.
    This is true, we Canadians are in command! Oh, small detail? That Gereral`s NATO superiour? An American Admiral...
    In plain terms: the current NATO commander (a Canuck) takes HIS orders from an American. Just fyi, the US is still `in command`.

    @OutWest and @handys003 are fast becomming my BIF! (best internet friends :-) )

    I eagerly await the first "anti-Libya kinetic action peace protest" AND @Baalth explaining his post...
  59. Profile photo of last1in
    last1in Male 18-29
    260 posts
    March 30, 2011 at 9:14 pm
    meh
  60. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 1:22 am
    5Cats: @OutWest and @handys003 are fast becomming my BIF!

    Hey what about me ?! :-)
    hehehe
  61. Profile photo of davidildo123
    davidildo123 Male 40-49
    143 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 3:22 am
    >I eagerly await the first "anti-Libya kinetic action peace protest"

    Ya missed one in Chicago. We had a couple thousand protesters with a lovely chant that said something like, "give the money to education, stop war and occupation". It was pretty hysterical listening to the chant, where it seemed they picked "education", only because it rhymed with "occupation", and they were protesting everything. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Israel,something about Wisconsin and there were even those lovely rainbow gay flags flying everywhere. People on the streets literally stopped to laugh at them while trying to figure out what they were actually protesting.

  62. Profile photo of zombunny
    zombunny Female 18-29
    2525 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 7:03 am
    "5Cats: @OutWest and @handys003 are fast becomming my BIF!

    CrakrJak: Hey what about me ?!
    hehehe"

    Awwwwww someone has a crush!
  63. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 7:26 am
    Did they give command to that Canadian commander with the panty fetish?
  64. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36198 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 7:31 am

    A politician was talking and put a spin on it that was
    not quite a lie but not quite true...

    This is newsworthy?

  65. Profile photo of davidildo123
    davidildo123 Male 40-49
    143 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 2:51 pm
    Gerry1of1
    "a spin that is not qite a lie but not quite true"...that is funny cause it is kinda like your post. Not quite a lie, but not quite true....

    Actually I think it is a bit more than that. He campaigned and sold himself as one who would never wage a war like this. It is a violation of what he said is a core belief..

    "I will only send our troops into harm’s way with a clear mission"

    "What I am opposed to is a rash war"

    "making absolutely certain that it is because there is an imminent threat, that American interests are going to be protected, that we have a plan to succeed and to exit"

    " I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. The world, and the Iraqi people would be better off without him. But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United Stat
  66. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 3:31 pm
    Hey what about me ?!
    Aww @Crackr! We`re VFFs already, eh? (virtual friends forever, lolz!)

    Awwwwww someone has a crush!
    Perhaps @Zombunny, but it`s a manly one! Like Vikings! Rrrrg!

    Did they give command to that Canadian commander with the panty fetish?
    Oh Lord! @madest! I sure hope not!! I mean, that guy was obviously from Quebec! (hopes that`s true...)
  67. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    March 31, 2011 at 3:34 pm
    @davidildo is correct: this Libya action not only violates everything he campaigned on, everything he promised, the US Constitution; it violates the trust of all those who voted for him.
    Thus the MSM spins night and day to put some lipstick on this PIG. (the pig = violation of trust, not Obama himself)
  68. Profile photo of davidildo123
    davidildo123 Male 40-49
    143 posts
    April 1, 2011 at 1:22 pm
    A Canadian agreeing with me?!?! HOLY CATS!!!! Maybe it is time to reconsider my postion. ;)

    "no amount of American lives can resolve the political disagreement that lies at the heart of someone else`s civil war." -Barak Obama on Iraq

    "if we waited one more day, Benghazi... could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world" - Barak Obama on Libya

Leave a Reply