Audrina Patridge Gets A Photoshop Treatment [Pics]

Submitted by: littlemissqt 6 years ago in Tech

The before and after of a photo shoot with Audrina Patridge. She"s hot for sure, but it takes a little Photoshop help.
There are 111 comments:
Female 189
I agree with you, _kiersten_
0
Reply
Male 5,413
Heh
0
Reply
Female 1,682
I think her body looks nice...I forgot that being skinny is oh so awful now-a-days though. -shrugs- I swear it goes back and forth. That girl is to skinny, that girl is to fat! Who the f*ck cares |:

Also. The photoshop didn`t do much but smooth some stuff over and make it look lighter.
0
Reply
Female 38
Want girls that thin? Deal with the exoskeleton.
0
Reply
Female 535
nasty ELBOWS?! seriously thecurt?!
0
Reply
Male 243
sad
0
Reply
Male 139
Upper lip anyone?
0
Reply
Male 577
They kep her the same size, they just smoothed over her bones, like someone else said. Now, that is setting an impossible standard.
0
Reply
Male 411
Ugh sick you can see her ribs, nasty elbows, and her waist looks nasty.
0
Reply
Male 28
She`s hot and supposedly really nice but the eyes throw me off.
0
Reply
Male 3,076
@MrAtari XD
0
Reply
Female 178
Hehehe Want a cookie? ^_^
0
Reply
Male 177
Swishhh @MrAtari
0
Reply
Female 163
Wow, they are `adding` to her figure....


Wow
0
Reply
Male 2,862
EAT SOMETHING !!!!
0
Reply
Male 312
I like the un-photoshopped one better. Probably because she was smiling in it.
0
Reply
Female 126
Jesus Christ, her right hip - WTF is that?! You know you have a skinny problem when the magazine actually has to plump up your waistline and arms. They never do that!
0
Reply
Male 1,569
after the shoot she went to biology class... as the skeleton...
0
Reply
Male 168
@lukeforv123

What is this "whacking off" nonsense...
we don`t do that at I-A-B, we only FAP, you perv.
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Yeah... anyone can be photoshopped sexy. Anyone. ... with enough photoshop.
0
Reply
Male 802
Would be more interesting if these were the same photo instead of just from the same shoot.
0
Reply
Male 382
If you must shop every part at least count all the white dots on her top and bottom before you finish and her hand still has all the wrinkles. I think she is fine without the shop. just a bad pose. Still hit it again tho
0
Reply
Male 1,071
Try and guess which picture I`d rather whack off to?

You can`t! Because I`m whacking off to both!
0
Reply
Male 7,831
skeezer1991, you may think so, but audrina and I actually have plans this saturday.
0
Reply
Male 720
I`ve said it before and I`ll say it again: Before shot is still way out of any IAB mod`s league.
0
Reply
Male 522
lmao @samidoll

these models look so awkward and sick. eat a big mac and some fried chicken for god`s sake! gross!
0
Reply
Female 418
I like the face on the original but she kind of looks starved in it.
0
Reply
Female 107
@entwife - They didn`t fill her out, they smoothed over her bones. Being skinny isn`t enough these days, you need to boneless.
0
Reply
Male 2,748
I really wish they wouldn`t shop stuff so much, but im pretty sure stuff needs it at least a little. And it`s kinda what i want to do for a living soooooo
0
Reply
Female 735
They made her face look like Miley Cyrus, rather than more attractive. Lolwhut?
0
Reply
Female 3,574
NEWS FLASH: All the people on magazine covers are heavily photoshopped.


... Wait, that isn`t news at all.
0
Reply
Male 2,688
I agree with SwyvedLegacy... If we weren`t so fixated on FALSE beauty, the standard wouldnt be so high and girls wouldnt be damn near killing themselves to reach goals that are physically impossible.

I personally like girls who are REAL... You other guys can keep your photoshopped and fake plastic women
0
Reply
Female 536
Weird that they actually added some meat on her in the photoshop version, instead of how they usually slim the model down. Look at her hips and belly area between the two pictures...they rounded her out more
0
Reply
Male 707
SwyvedLegaci for Pres!!
0
Reply
Male 2,988
her face looks better in the non shopped version
0
Reply
Male 633
psh, like she`s not hot in the before photo??
i`d tap it.
0
Reply
Male 364
@swyvedLegacy - ya, not so much. Thing is, beauty is different to everyone - it is no more dictated by these images than by your belief that your body should be the standard of beauty for everybody else.

Live and let live, kids.
0
Reply
Female 160
Again, if they would just stop touching up photos we`d very quickly have a new standard of beauty that is more realistic. Boo!!
0
Reply
Male 1,002
Is this actually still shocking to anyone? This isn`t some shady secretive thing they do to cheat and mislead us, this is just turning a raw image into a professional, ready to print image. This isn`t art photography, this is commercial photography.
0
Reply
Female 21
It isn`t the same photo. Lame
0
Reply
Female 18
Well I have to say that I`m naturally very thin and considered under-weight for my age, but I eat well and I`m also just a scrawny 18 year old girl who`s still growing. =D At her age, though, she would look much healthier with a bit more weight on her bones.
0
Reply
Female 91
the hip bone is jutting out DB EEEEW
0
Reply
Male 7,831
yugurekage, thin waist, nice hips an butt, nice breasts. that is the ideal womans body, although, "nice" is different from person to person. i hope that clears things up.
0
Reply
Female 614
lesson here: there is no perfect. just be happy with yourself. you don`t want to look sick. that healthy glow is added afterwards, it does not occur naturally.

it`s okay to not be model-thin, gals, because models look awkward and sick.
0
Reply
Male 49
She`s LESS thin in real life then after Photoshop.
That`s a first...
0
Reply
Male 10
Such a shame. Beautiful women starving themselves to the point that they appear emaciated. Hip bones and ribs protruding as seen in the untouched photo look terrible. Yet they photoshop her waist even smaller and just smooth the bones away to make it look possible to be healthy and have such unattainable body proportions.
0
Reply
Male 491
Should have shopped a bag over her head.
0
Reply
Female 1,356
they are different pictures...
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Yeah, because real beauty is overrated anyways
0
Reply
Male 1,116
She needs a sandwich.
0
Reply
Male 417
She is just all kinds of ugly
0
Reply
Male 36
same pose but different picture would have been better if you had the untouched photo
0
Reply
Male 2,344
Oh, her hip.. ugh. Agree with Inter, though, lovely face.
0
Reply
Male 522
what a babe :o! the girl`s body is designed to be in a bikini.
0
Reply
Male 371
would still hit that
0
Reply
Female 56
the_phantom, that`s before photoshop. She`s just weird lookin.
0
Reply
Female 1,203
ok here`s what I don`t get. Media tells us that women need to be extremely thin to be pretty and yet they shopped more meat onto her (around the thighs especially) this is giving me mixed messages! X_x
0
Reply
Male 2,033
Who?
0
Reply
Male 2,441
Still has a very pretty face
0
Reply
Male 510
WTF IS WITH HER LEFT HIP WHERE HER LEG cONNECTS TO HER BDOY??? LOOKS LIKE A BAD SHOP JOB
0
Reply
Male 118
frebasnsuga, yep.
0
Reply
Female 133
Wow, her body is just creepy. And her skin looks like it belongs on a 50 year old.
0
Reply
Female 2,927
eat something dammit!
0
Reply
Male 2,579
that girl needs a hearty meal
0
Reply
Male 92
Anyone that is still blown away by this has been living in a box or under a rock. Just so you know, ALL MAGAZINES DO THIS. All of them. Not just on models. On everything.
0
Reply
Male 605
She is definitely not as hot as all the supermodels im always with! Gosh lady fix urself!
0
Reply
Male 639
Thank God for photoshop, otherwise I`d be embarrassed to be seen with that thing.
0
Reply
Female 155
She is way too skinny, her stomach/ abdomen is weird
0
Reply
Male 14
its not even the same dratin pic! the hand is positioned different and everything.. similar poses but not the same pic, shopped or not.
0
Reply
Male 531
wtf
0
Reply
Male 2,516
Sorry IRockYeah it`s all I can see... I try to move up and down but it`s... there... just weirding me out
0
Reply
Male 25,416
OMG she has a crease
0
Reply
Male 1,627
real life sucks
0
Reply
Male 2,619
Apart from the hip thing, which in all fairness didnt freak me out until SOMEONE pointed it out, I like the untouched pic better. Shes naturally beautiful
0
Reply
Male 2,516
wow the hip-leg part ... I can`t get over that wtf
0
Reply
Male 5,413
@McGovern XD Awesome picture sir.

As for the image... meh I already knew that. Check out the stretch marks. *Shivers*
0
Reply
Male 493
I agree with thatwasCRAP, probably won`t need a model soon.
0
Reply
Female 2,674
Wow, she`s really beautiful. I never really noticed before. Maybe because I saw her on tv in the past and the fact that she`s nearly retarded clouded my vision.
0
Reply
Female 16
@thatwasCRAP

They probably shopped on the facial portion of a different photo from the shoot.
0
Reply
Male 397
moefreak. I have accepted this. I choose soft.
0
Reply
Male 7,831
okay, i can see photoshopping her. seeing all her bones is kind of gross.
0
Reply
Male 58
looking at the pic again, it shouldnt be too long before they dont even need a model, just a really good artist. creepy how they total changed her face too. do you think models look at their pics in the mags and think they actually look like that.
0
Reply
Male 1,182
they made her fatter...
0
Reply
Male 14,331

0
Reply
Male 288
I like both girls.
0
Reply
Female 404
so bony
0
Reply
Female 1,963
They made her waist smaller and yet made her look sort of... plumper. She`s skinny right down too the bone, and yet her waist wasn`t small enough. Just goes to show how paradoxical our beauty ideals are. We want women to look thin to the point of emaciation, and yet soft. You can`t have soft and bony all at once, people.
0
Reply
Female 2,026
like how they hide her ribs by adding fat! haha starving herself for nothing
0
Reply
Female 570
@thatwascrap
yeah you can clearly see they filled it up a little and made em perkier
0
Reply
Male 3,842
[quote]Lol usually they make girls skinny. This time they added fat.[/quote]

This.

Just goes to show that really skinny girls are gross, too.
0
Reply
Male 11,739
Another one they should have just left alone. Magazines should not be allowed to own Photoshop.
0
Reply
Male 169
what do you mean left her boobs the same size. just compare how much her right boob has extended past her body
0
Reply
Male 58
@DGbME: you obviously havt stared at a pair of boobs long enough. the left one is way bigger in the shopped one and the left one is a little less saggy
0
Reply
Male 302
GOOD GOD! What is wrong with the top of her right leg?!
0
Reply
Male 2,548
Her hip is creeping me out.
0
Reply
Female 455
She`s very thin... :/
0
Reply
Male 451
At least they left her boobs the same size, and her size too. Just smoothed things out. This is one of the more legit shops. Hell, I shop pics of myself sometimes too. mostly skin mottled areas like this.
0
Reply
Female 220
Lol usually they make girls skinny. This time they added fat.
0
Reply
Female 254
no wonder girls have body issues...
0
Reply
Female 870
wow they even changed her expression.
0
Reply
Female 4,039
@CaptainPabst - No kidding! :O
0
Reply
Male 546

0
Reply
Male 10,338
Good god I hate skinny girls.
0
Reply
Male 116
Why!
0
Reply
Male 1,547
notice that when they photoshop these people, they make them paler because NOBODY THINKS ULTRA TANNING IS ATTRACTIVE.
0
Reply
Male 221
Ugh.
0
Reply
Male 1,249
There is something wrong with the world when they have to airbrush fat ONTO the model...
0
Reply
Male 1,587
Does she look better? I don`t know.. I like her face better untouched.
0
Reply
Male 39,920
She`s so skinny...... no, it`s not funny.

Someone feed her!
0
Reply
Male 2,332
Skeletor!
0
Reply
Female 1,605
Link: Audrina Patridge Gets A Photoshop Treatment [Pics] [Rate Link] - The before and after of a photo shoot with Audrina Patridge. She`s hot for sure, but it takes a little Photoshop help.
0
Reply