Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 43    Average: 3.6/5]
92 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 21216
Rating: 3.6
Category:
Date: 01/10/11 02:30 PM

92 Responses to 7 Billion People In 2011

  1. Profile photo of MonoBrow
    MonoBrow Male 18-29
    543 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 1:55 pm
    Link: 7 Billion People In 2011 - The worldwide population expected to exceed 7 billion in 2011. Where are we all gonna fit?
  2. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8309 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:39 pm
    First we should shoot anyone who`s IQ is half what it should be at their age, then with the 1 billion or so left...
  3. Profile photo of Vindictive
    Vindictive Female 18-29
    1077 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:46 pm
    people need to stop reproducing.
  4. Profile photo of Quik2TheStab
    Quik2TheStab Male 18-29
    661 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:46 pm
    Lionhart, IQ doesn`t change with age.

    I say we put every third person in some sort of furnace.
  5. Profile photo of Discobiscuit
    Discobiscuit Male 18-29
    542 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:46 pm
    Every human being on earth, as long as they stand in a 3 by 3 foot area, could fit on Rhode Island. Or so I`ve read 4 years ago, idk.
  6. Profile photo of tvremote
    tvremote Male 18-29
    447 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:50 pm
    Hooray cities. I grew up in a very rural part of New Jersey and now live in NYC. Can`t imagine why people would want to live in rural areas. So boring.
  7. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8309 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:52 pm
    Quik2TheStab, you pass. The rest of you form a line over there in front of that man with the gun...

    :-)
  8. Profile photo of Quik2TheStab
    Quik2TheStab Male 18-29
    661 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 2:52 pm
    Because cities smell like ass. So do rural areas. Suburbs, yo!
  9. Profile photo of Kegomatix
    Kegomatix Male 18-29
    1341 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:00 pm
    Ok ok I get it 7 billion is a big number... Geez.
  10. Profile photo of premierwondr
    premierwondr Male 18-29
    975 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:04 pm
    I know and it scares the poo out of me
  11. Profile photo of Volsunga
    Volsunga Male 18-29
    1548 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:15 pm
    Space is not a problem. One need only look at the massive expanses of undeveloped land in the American West and Midwest to see this. The problem, arguably is resources. However, we have the ability to develop land for resource production easily. Think of all the farmland that could be made in Northern Africa if modern techniques were used and we start pushing back the Sahara. Necessity will fix the political obstacles in developing the third world. The development of renewable energy will preserve non-renewable resources. We still have a couple centuries before overpopulation is a problem, and we had better be colonizing and terraforming Mars by then.
  12. Profile photo of ajd121
    ajd121 Male 18-29
    625 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:20 pm
    "Every human being on earth, as long as they stand in a 3 by 3 foot area, could fit on Rhode Island. Or so I`ve read 4 years ago, idk."

    There are 5,280 feet in a mile so there are 27,878,400 square feet in a mile (5,280^2)and there are 1,214 square miles in Rhode Island.

    27,878,400 x 1,214 = 33,844,377,600 square feet in Rhode Island.

    Divided by 3 for 3 feet per person means that 11,281,459,200 could fit in Rhode Island given a 3 foot square of space to stand.
  13. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:34 pm
    Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...
  14. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:34 pm
    Yeah what AJD said.

    I read somewhere that, only 2% of the land on Earth is developed, and only 2% of that is urbanized.

    Yes, that`s taking into account water area.
  15. Profile photo of Skythe
    Skythe Male 18-29
    965 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:34 pm
    The other 6,999,999,999 of you are breathing my air.
  16. Profile photo of KPres
    KPres Male 30-39
    309 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:37 pm
    The rate at which the world`s population grows is falling. If we continue at the current pace, the population will peak at 9 Billion around 2050, and then start falling, as it already is in much of the Western world.

    http://www.humanistwa.org.au/node/433

    Relax, people, you can call off the apocalypse.
  17. Profile photo of reeealybored
    reeealybored Male 13-17
    6 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:42 pm
    did anyone else notice that of all of the pictures showed at the end, most of them were of the asian side of the world?
  18. Profile photo of mvangild
    mvangild Male 30-39
    527 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:44 pm
    @AJD121, well, that`s great, but would you want to be the poor schmuck in the middle when you have to go to the bathroom? :)

    Or worse yet, if someone right next to you had to go?
  19. Profile photo of phoneybone
    phoneybone Male 18-29
    1744 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 3:52 pm
    get the F*CK off my planet!!
  20. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:03 pm
    I`m gonna skip all the "We have to be wary of the population" bullsh*t and just say this:

    We need to go into space. Not just low Earth orbit; I mean going to other planets. That`s right, Mars, we`re gonna colonize your ass and fill it with strip malls!
  21. Profile photo of HoneyPunch
    HoneyPunch Female 13-17
    124 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:22 pm
    Just stop screwing!

    ....

    NAW!
  22. Profile photo of 8BitHero
    8BitHero Male 18-29
    5414 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:28 pm
    Pretty interesting
  23. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:30 pm
    Don`t worry it`s supposed to be taken care of in 12-21-2012
  24. Profile photo of Wildcats2008
    Wildcats2008 Male 18-29
    237 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:34 pm
    This seemed like propaganda for environmentalists but hey, maybe it was just me...

    One thing that did bother me was that they kept referring to everyone as a global population...whatever happened to being proud of your country and where are you from? I`m not talking about radically proud and thinking your country is superior. I think we aught to be proud of our diversity and differing countries instead of insisting on being so globalist.
  25. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25408 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:45 pm
    So what, i still have my space, so im happy
  26. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36213 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 4:46 pm
    damn PeaceCorps!

    we never should have shown the 3rd world how to get clean water and grow food!
  27. Profile photo of alibi19
    alibi19 Male 18-29
    73 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:01 pm
    If our population increases at a exponential rate and our food production increases at a linear rate, its just a matter of time before we simply cant feed everyone. Throw in factors like the growing average lifespan and the growing ecological footprint of developing countries and it doesn`t take a mathematician to figure out that we (and our environment) are in serious trouble. Environmentalists have been warning people for years about over population, but not surprisingly, nothing has been done.
  28. Profile photo of rainbowfarts
    rainbowfarts Female 18-29
    798 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:18 pm
    This is what I don`t understand. I have to read about this stuff all the time (sociology grad student) and you have some resources saying the population is growing too much that we won`t be able to feed everyone. Then I go over to other resources and they talk about how in 1st world countries the population is dramatically shrinking, especially in Western Europe and Japan and even the population in 3rd world countries is slowly leveling out too and will begin to shrink soon. What gives?!
  29. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:25 pm
    fatninja01 you are lucky cause you live in a continent that maybe have less population than Tokyo. But if people continue to increase and consume without any rationality no matter if you have space or not, the world will be screwed anyway, yep sadly also your space.
  30. Profile photo of Volsunga
    Volsunga Male 18-29
    1548 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:27 pm
    @alibi19
    food production is not linear, it follows the rules of supply and demand. people are starving in the third world because in their local markets, there is a minuscule supply compared to the demand. now that there is a global market, as soon as we can cut through the political bullsh*t with their f*cked up governments, the food production curve will match the population curve for a very long time.
    Overpopulation is a myth because it completely ignores the future accommodations made by the economies to support the population.
  31. Profile photo of ryan99
    ryan99 Male 13-17
    2346 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    I`m very curious as to why they predict a sudden decrease in growth. I always expected the human population to grow exponentially?
  32. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:35 pm
    Volsunga if ALL people in the world will start to consume like the so called first world,or occidental style if you prefere, there will be no new economic way that will save us from destruction.Basicaly our way of energy production is unaffordable also today and barely cover just 1/3 of world population,if the other 2/3 start to consume like us i really don`t see a great future.
  33. Profile photo of alibi19
    alibi19 Male 18-29
    73 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:36 pm
    @rainbowfarts, In developed countries the need to have children is less than in developing countries. Think of it this way: you`re a farmer in a developing country. You know you`re going to get old and need people to take care of you. If you have 9 kids, you will have more hands helping you in the fields and they can better support you, than if you only had like 2 children. In Short, more children=high productivity=better "retirement". Most developed countries have retirement programs so people don`t have to do this. Fortunately, organizations have gone into the developing countries and educated them of how having nine kids is unsustainable, and thats probably why some people think growth in developing countries will peter out.
  34. Profile photo of Volsunga
    Volsunga Male 18-29
    1548 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:47 pm
    @piperfawn
    energy production is not a problem because we are already moving towards renewable energy worldwide. It`s simply cheaper than the alternatives. Remember that when the third world develops enough to consume like us, they will also produce like us, and with more arable surface area to work with, it all evens out.
  35. Profile photo of hammerdrop
    hammerdrop Male 13-17
    199 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:48 pm
    was cool until i realized it was an ad
  36. Profile photo of DixxyRarr
    DixxyRarr Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:49 pm
    Everyone just needs to eat one person.


    Not it.
  37. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:56 pm
    Volsunga i really hope you are right but i`m still sceptic. Our planet is not endless, we can`t just keep growing at this rate also if we can find some way to absorb our requests the break point will arrive.
  38. Profile photo of ryan99
    ryan99 Male 13-17
    2346 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 5:59 pm
    @DixxyRarr

    If everyone eats one person..That means in the end, there will be but one survivor :O
  39. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 6:00 pm
    this makes me more terrified of the world than any threat of "terrorism" ever could...
  40. Profile photo of rainbowfarts
    rainbowfarts Female 18-29
    798 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 6:04 pm
    @alibi19, no offense but considering that I study these sorts of things at a graduate level, I know all of that. The point though is even developing countries are cutting back on how many children they have. So in India, instead of having say 5 kids they`re having 3 or 4 on average. My point is there are people on one side saying "omg not enough people to care for the old people! Not enough children!" and then the other side is crying "omg too many people, we`re all going to starve!" It can`t really be both. And especially in cases where places like Germany are expected to have only 17% of what their population in 1997 was by the year 2050 and shrinking also in other first world countries while 3rd world are evening out I don`t see how we can worry about both overpopulation and underpopulation.
  41. Profile photo of Seak
    Seak Male 18-29
    1505 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 6:17 pm
    They shall fit in my pants.
  42. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3435 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 6:27 pm
    7 billion, 10 Billion, 14 Billion, eventually *something* will wipe us all out unless we cut the umbilical cord that ties us to the planet we`re on. Who knows maybe our remains will be used as some sort of fossil fuel by the next creature to gain a greater degree of self awareness, my money is on the Crow.
  43. Profile photo of Volsunga
    Volsunga Male 18-29
    1548 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 6:35 pm
    @piperfawn
    Why not? As long as we are able to support ourselves, there really can`t be any moral reason to not keep growing. The planet is a self contained system that will survive no matter what. What we need to do is cut ourselves off from it and look to the stars.
  44. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 7:12 pm
    Is a nice dream Volsunga unfortunatly i think i will never see that. In any case i hope this will happen soon.
  45. Profile photo of TheShgn2
    TheShgn2 Male 13-17
    626 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 7:43 pm
    If everyone only had one kid for a few generations (like in China, but less sexism) population wouldn`t be a problem.
  46. Profile photo of Crucible
    Crucible Male 18-29
    1817 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 8:28 pm
    Canada is encouraging having lots of kids, in order to establish a huge population with a Canadian heritage, as opposed to some other country (which is how it is now, since we have so many immigrants or children of immigrants)
  47. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 8:41 pm
    Meh. It was cool and all, but I didn`t really learn anything new.

    The global population is already beginning to level off. The rate of growth is less than it was 10 years ago.
  48. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 8:42 pm
    Heh heh... 7000 posts and I didn`t realize it. That`s one post for every million....

    Oh nevermind.
  49. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12151 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 8:52 pm
    Happy 7K`th post, Lazy!
  50. Profile photo of Namikaze
    Namikaze Male 18-29
    222 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 9:20 pm
    With WMD`s we could cut that 7 billion in half by the end of the week. We didn`t create them to not be used.
  51. Profile photo of rammo34
    rammo34 Male 18-29
    1083 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 9:54 pm
    That`s terrifying.
  52. Profile photo of Heureux
    Heureux Male 40-49
    1054 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 10:22 pm
    Namikaze

    Are you volunteering to be among the 3.5 billion killed?
  53. Profile photo of jeffcomedy
    jeffcomedy Male 30-39
    178 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 11:22 pm
    Heck, in this country alone we got plenty of space. But everyone (or at least the majority) want to live in the big four: CA TX FL NY.
  54. Profile photo of handimanner
    handimanner Male 60-69
    2095 posts
    January 10, 2011 at 11:48 pm
    and they`re all moving in next door
  55. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 12:10 am
    @rammo:

    War Eagle.....
  56. Profile photo of bankvole
    bankvole Male 30-39
    959 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 12:44 am
    I hate when these things are coached in terms of fear. `Fell guilty for being too many`. I like humans. So long as we`re not arseholes we should be okay
  57. Profile photo of SvampeBob
    SvampeBob Male 18-29
    3076 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 12:47 am
    So long as we`re not arseholes we should be okay correction: If we weren`t such arsholes we would be okay, but most of the leaders are arsholes so we are pretty much drated
  58. Profile photo of beternal
    beternal Male 18-29
    2589 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 1:21 am
    Heck, in this country alone we got plenty of space. But everyone (or at least the majority) want to live in the big four: CA TX FL NY.
    ________________________________
    Sounded like for a moment there you were calling those states countries!

    Yep, the US has lots of space but you`re not to hot on people coming in...... the UK has very little but we`re too nice to tell them all to F-off! :-)
  59. Profile photo of steve41high
    steve41high Male 18-29
    1153 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 2:04 am
    its obvious where we fit isn`t it. humans just keep pushing out other animals, and stealing their habitat. i hate humans we`re such dicks
  60. Profile photo of quick1dunkno
    quick1dunkno Male 18-29
    99 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 3:05 am
    weve been requiring this " balance" for centuries now.. its nothing new..
    theres enough space.. dont listen to the elite and their bullcrap about how we are over populated.. you dont need a friggin 10 square mile estate to survive.. :/
  61. Profile photo of MattPrince
    MattPrince Male 40-49
    2220 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 4:46 am
    If everyone is to live at the same level, the same consumption, then the planet is already overpopulated. The earth is a finite resource so the human population on it can`t keep growing without consequence. Simple mathematics.

    If you don`t care about the environment you can ignore the warning signs and keep on growing. The earth will tend to huge metropolises, factory zones, vast monoculture fields, and dead oceans. That to me sucks big time.

    The only way to retain the worlds natural heritage (and there is much to be learnt and exploited here don`t forget), is population control and a move to a steady state economy.
  62. Profile photo of MattPrince
    MattPrince Male 40-49
    2220 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 4:48 am
    quick1dunko said "dont listen to the elite and their bullcrap "

    You are the elite.

    "there`s enough space" is the bullcrap.
  63. Profile photo of SherbertFizz
    SherbertFizz Female 18-29
    277 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 5:44 am
    We are already over populated. As a species we ruin ourselves with not allowing people to just die. I`m not even going to get into how we`re ruining our chances for a long survival by interfering with natural selection.
  64. Profile photo of Creabhain
    Creabhain Male 40-49
    440 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 6:46 am
    We are following nature`s plan. Expand until we use up or destroy the environment then we die off and the planet recovers. If a few of us are left <CTRL><ALT><DEL> otherwise another species tops the food chain sooner or later and it starts again. The planet was here before us and will be here after us. Also we may leave Earth at some point.
  65. Profile photo of s0rd3dvis1on
    s0rd3dvis1on Male 18-29
    2389 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:01 am
    i liked it till i realised it was an advert
    "7 billion reasons to think about 7 billion people"
  66. Profile photo of s0rd3dvis1on
    s0rd3dvis1on Male 18-29
    2389 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:04 am
    ftl will never happen so the stars are pretty much out unless you countcryo sleep or something that would be good but no communication so whats the point?
  67. Profile photo of B-b-beccah
    B-b-beccah Female 18-29
    668 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:17 am
    got lots of room in C-c-c-canada! hope you like the cold though, prob should dress warm.
  68. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:29 am
    "The earth will tend to huge metropolises, factory zones, vast monoculture fields, and dead oceans."

    Like I said before. About 2% of the Earth is developed, and about 2% of that is urbanized. That includes oceans.

    We can irrigate the deserts. There is a huge aquifer under the Sahara. They just recently found it. If push came to shove, and we HAD to spend the money, they could find a way to grow food there.

    Synthetic foods. Bio-domes. Ocean water purifiers. There are ways to sustain us that we haven`t explored, because we don`t need to, but if the reason arose, they would happen, and we would be fine.
  69. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:30 am
    Sorry for that last sentence. I broke the record for comma use lol.
  70. Profile photo of Creabhain
    Creabhain Male 40-49
    440 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:39 am
    Well said, auburnjunky. Necessity is the mother of invention. We are not even close to using up the earth`s resources yet.
  71. Profile photo of missPWNAGE
    missPWNAGE Female 18-29
    298 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 8:18 am
    "We are not even close to using up the earth`s resources yet."

    Ha! Please, educate yourself, ask a geologist about what we`re doing to the earth...
  72. Profile photo of missPWNAGE
    missPWNAGE Female 18-29
    298 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 8:20 am
    We humans will die off, the earth will recycle itself and life will begin again. Don`t be so naive to think we`re gonna be ok with 7 billion and counting.
  73. Profile photo of Geogypsy
    Geogypsy Female 18-29
    2546 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 8:32 am
    I`m glad for not renewing my subscription now ... a year long series may get a little tedious.
  74. Profile photo of Calummac
    Calummac Male 13-17
    341 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 8:44 am
    YO MAMMA!
  75. Profile photo of ToshSucksO
    ToshSucksO Male 30-39
    9 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 9:18 am
    Most people would get mad about this, but we really need to kill the majority of people living in third world countries. We could then go in and turn that space into useable living space/resource gathering space and eventually people will start living and thriving in there.

    Think of it this way, what`s easier: 1) Fixing up a house that was burn to the ground or 2) Removing the crumbles and replacing it with all new house
  76. Profile photo of Samsquanch
    Samsquanch Male 30-39
    792 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 9:28 am
    Eugenics is the only way. But it`s too "unethical".
  77. Profile photo of piperfawn
    piperfawn Male 30-39
    4888 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 10:12 am
    Ouch guys the 2 last comments are creeeeeepy! Brrrrr
  78. Profile photo of c3rv4
    c3rv4 Male 18-29
    270 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 10:46 am
    So lets all move to LA...

    and ToshSuckO...
    You have mental problems sir.
  79. Profile photo of greggpethers
    greggpethers Male 18-29
    271 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 11:21 am
    thats really cool, thanks IAB.

  80. Profile photo of furryblob
    furryblob Male 18-29
    574 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 2:43 pm
    ToshSucksO and Samsquanch, congratulations you are today`s winners of `douchebag of the day` award. That was much harsher but I toned it down just for you.
  81. Profile photo of mogman45
    mogman45 Male 18-29
    224 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 2:47 pm
    With ToshSucksO`s logic, we should kill ToshSucksO. His house burned 30-39 years ago.
  82. Profile photo of DamienLike
    DamienLike Male 13-17
    705 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 4:25 pm
    Okay, so according to the World Population Clock, we`re currently on
    6,866,965,461 at the exact time of January 12, 2011 00:23:51
  83. Profile photo of MrsPoods
    MrsPoods Female 18-29
    547 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 4:58 pm
    It really makes you hate those "19 Kids and Counting" people
  84. Profile photo of obhwfgirl
    obhwfgirl Female 18-29
    582 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 6:43 pm
    Dude, I`m totally buying National Geographic now. :)


    And humans are still not the largest biomass on earth. That would be the bacteria!
  85. Profile photo of kittilia
    kittilia Female 18-29
    500 posts
    January 11, 2011 at 7:11 pm
    hehe furry blob. there should definitely be an award for this. I think toshsuckso would even win douchebag of the year.
  86. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    January 12, 2011 at 8:30 am
    Give each family a 0.25 acre lot, add another 20% for roads etc. and assume an average family size of 4. You would need ~820,000 square miles of land. That`s about the same as Texas (~269,000) and Alaska (~663,000) put together. Not sure if I have a point but an interesting calculation to me.
  87. Profile photo of meepmaker
    meepmaker Male 30-39
    6694 posts
    January 12, 2011 at 8:56 am
    All the Hottie chicks can stay at my place.
  88. Profile photo of mathgirl12
    mathgirl12 Female 13-17
    117 posts
    January 12, 2011 at 2:43 pm
    You can fit everyone in the world in Rhode Island.
  89. Profile photo of axeman929
    axeman929 Male 30-39
    195 posts
    January 12, 2011 at 8:35 pm
    There are a lot of empty foreclosed homes in my town. Seems like there is plenty of room.
  90. Profile photo of coolthing97
    coolthing97 Male 18-29
    1057 posts
    January 13, 2011 at 4:44 pm
    That was cool. I think that those were some very interesting statistics and I loved it. :-)

Leave a Reply