Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 34    Average: 2.6/5]
103 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 22212
Rating: 2.6
Category: Weird
Date: 11/01/10 12:23 PM

103 Responses to Time Traveller In Chaplin Film May Be Explained

  1. Profile photo of Monosandalos
    Monosandalos Male 30-39
    277 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:24 pm
    Link: Time Traveller In Chaplin Film May Be Explained - Siemens 1924 hearing aid might be mystery object in Charlie Chaplin time travel video.
  2. Profile photo of postmater
    postmater Male 30-39
    18 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:28 pm
    vid not working for me in uk but yeah, the answer was buried in the comments on the guys youtube vid the same day he posted it.
  3. Profile photo of osirisascend
    osirisascend Male 40-49
    3039 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:29 pm
    Spooky.
  4. Profile photo of Jonno22
    Jonno22 Male 18-29
    55 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:30 pm
    this video is not available in my country
  5. Profile photo of CCMA_19
    CCMA_19 Female 18-29
    311 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:32 pm
    But, if she WAS using a cell phone, how would it work without a cell phone tower or satellite?
  6. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:33 pm
    This will be instantly shunned because it is Fox.
  7. Profile photo of vicious_liar
    vicious_liar Male 13-17
    1226 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:34 pm
    This video is not available in your country.

    F*ck you Youtube, f*ck you...
  8. Profile photo of gingernut333
    gingernut333 Female 18-29
    1071 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:34 pm
    Not available in my country apparently! =(
  9. Profile photo of Maksie99
    Maksie99 Male 18-29
    695 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:35 pm
    Apparently us Europeans aren`t qualified to watch this -_-
  10. Profile photo of SlothOfDoom
    SlothOfDoom Male 30-39
    2033 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:36 pm
    Why are people still talking about this? My god, people are retarded.
  11. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36201 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:36 pm
    "may be explained" ...

    did I miss the explaination part?
  12. Profile photo of awsome-guy
    awsome-guy Male 13-17
    151 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:37 pm
    this video is not available in your country so i don`t think it will be explained =(
  13. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:44 pm
    Awww, that`s adorable. Fox News is trying to research a rational explanation rather than adding frenzy to a ridiculous story. Baby steps, I guess.
  14. Profile photo of ruthless1990
    ruthless1990 Female 18-29
    3001 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:51 pm
    "this video is not available in your country"

    screw you. screwwww you. -.-
  15. Profile photo of shizzamX
    shizzamX Female 18-29
    2697 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:56 pm
    lolwut
  16. Profile photo of ggolbez
    ggolbez Male 18-29
    1933 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:57 pm
    Stupid people.
  17. Profile photo of beccab86
    beccab86 Female 18-29
    347 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:58 pm
    Has anyone thought she might just be a loon?
  18. Profile photo of newbzoorz
    newbzoorz Male 13-17
    217 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 12:58 pm
    That guy seemed REALLY excited.
  19. Profile photo of davidstone
    davidstone Male 18-29
    92 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:01 pm
    Fox News said it wasn`t a cell phone, so it was definitely a cell phone.
  20. Profile photo of Piepig
    Piepig Male 13-17
    1524 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:02 pm
    People already figured that out... Darn late news stations.
  21. Profile photo of a1butcher
    a1butcher Male 40-49
    4812 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:16 pm
    She had a tooth ache and is muttering to herself....

    so yea, IT HAS to be A CELL PHONE and she IS a time traveller.
  22. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    31783 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:17 pm
    It was a silent movie, she can talk on the set, no biggie!
    Anyhow, the Fortean Times explained this a LOT better than these news-clowns...
  23. Profile photo of Inter237
    Inter237 Male 18-29
    2441 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:24 pm
    It`s the prank calling phone Cartman used when he went to the future
  24. Profile photo of chimion
    chimion Male 18-29
    91 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:26 pm
    maybe she had invisible friend lol... like those people in crazy hospital
  25. Profile photo of SPARTAKITTY
    SPARTAKITTY Female 18-29
    2123 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:31 pm
    I hate FOX news.
  26. Profile photo of MaxFischer
    MaxFischer Male 18-29
    9 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:41 pm
    Its a shy woman, who upon walking past notices the camera is pointing in her direction, thats why she`s holding the COLLAR of her COAT, in a bid to hider her face. As for the talking, its a normal reaction when embarrased eg ``Oh god, I hope Im not being filmed...`` Also explains the bashful smile at the camera. End of story a shy woman who isnt used to/doesnt want to be filmed.

    Time traveller? Honestly?
  27. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25408 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:46 pm
    Wow, interesting or maybe its the time travelling woman covering herself! :P
  28. Profile photo of todayistodie
    todayistodie Male 18-29
    80 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:48 pm
    that woman. she is queen of the trolls.
  29. Profile photo of freddyferret
    freddyferret Male 40-49
    11742 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:53 pm
    @MaxFischer - maybe your friends talk to themselves like that. But sane people don`t talk to themselves out loud. I`m not sure I buy the time traveler thing, but I don`t think it was anything that has been explained yet.

    A hearing aid would have been larger. She was not holding her collar (really...what are you seeing?), and it was not what we would consider a mobile phone. There would have been no way to use it. If it was a communications device (which is possible if the person really IS a time traveler), it would be using technology beyond what we know now.

    I don`t think we`ll ever figure out the truth, but no one in their right mind would think she`s talking to herself because she thinks she might be on camera.
  30. Profile photo of Kegomatix
    Kegomatix Male 18-29
    1341 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 1:53 pm
    Maxfischer..

    Time travel, stupid yes. But your explanation kinda sucks. What collar are you seeing her hold up? I don`t see one.. And if she was so embarrassed about the cameras on her why would she go in front of them, and at the end why did she stop, then turn and face the cameras...?
  31. Profile photo of hwkiller
    hwkiller Male 18-29
    490 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:03 pm
    Has no one questioned who she would be talking to?
    Cell towers did not exist.
    Satellites (man-made communication satellites) did not exist.
  32. Profile photo of EvilDictator
    EvilDictator Male 13-17
    99 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:06 pm
    If it was actually a time traveler, we can be assured that soon we will not have any recollection of this happening seeing as she will simply go back in time and divert her past self from walking across the camera, and poof, it disappears from the internet and our collective consciousness` as a whole. So basically, if it stays and gets to be a meme, it isnt real, if it disappears, it is real, but we wont know it.
  33. Profile photo of MaxFischer
    MaxFischer Male 18-29
    9 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:15 pm
    I still stand by my arguemen, and freddy Im not mental myself for thinking people talk to themselves, especially ELDERLY LADIES who are put on the spot...



    I still think she`s pulling the pose in the above pictures, just her hand is further up.
    Also a quick google search will show that many people talk to themselves when they think they`re alone, its not behaviour exclusive to the mentally ill. All I think is to even entertain the notion that this is a time traveller above someone with odd behaviour is ridiculous
  34. Profile photo of TehTy
    TehTy Male 13-17
    112 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:22 pm
    Oh wow, a news shows practically stole an article from a youtuber.
  35. Profile photo of zlatan
    zlatan Male 18-29
    292 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:27 pm
    maybe she was just talking to herself.
  36. Profile photo of msieg007
    msieg007 Male 18-29
    2035 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:36 pm
    Did anyone mention the lack of cell phone towers yet? I feel like we didn`t cover it enough in the prior post about this.
  37. Profile photo of Crucible
    Crucible Male 18-29
    1817 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:42 pm
    So, she`s talking on her cell phone.
    Which would be the ONLY CELL PHONE IN EXISTENCE.
  38. Profile photo of slab-of-rage
    slab-of-rage Male 18-29
    769 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:43 pm
    I don`t think it`s a time traveller - just a woman with something in her hand, possibly holding her hand in front of her face so as not to get filmed walking past.

    HOWEVER. Everyone saying "ooh no cell towers or satellites" should consider that if she has access to time travel technology, a communicator device that can be used without satellites or towers should bot be a problem.

    That and walkie talkies, people!
  39. Profile photo of SomeShoes
    SomeShoes Male 13-17
    2056 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 2:53 pm
    im on she was talking to her self or something
  40. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 3:04 pm
    Heck, again with the Charles Chaplin stuff? its been debunked already, geez
  41. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 3:14 pm
    I love the people who aren`t sure if it is a real time traveler.

    Critical thinking is important here. Ask yourself some questions:
    1) Wouldn`t time travelers have access to radical life extension technologies and thus not appear as an old woman?
    2) Why would an elderly woman be chosen as a time traveler, especially one that has no idea to hide her "cell/time phone" in 1928?
    3) Wouldn`t time travelers have access to miniaturization far more advanced than ours and would have a "cell/time phone far smaller than today`s?
    4) Wouldn`t a people advanced enough to travel time have access to Virtual Reality that was realistic and accurate enough to negate the need for time travel?
    5) couldn`t there be more reasonable explanations, such as hearing aid, holding her collar, hiding her face, mental illness?

    But if you aren`t going to apply logic, then I say that she is holding an 8th generation Wii controller.
  42. Profile photo of kj36
    kj36 Female 18-29
    240 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 3:38 pm
    NottaSpy:
    That entire list was illogical and.. awful. Just awful.
  43. Profile photo of wtmac
    wtmac Male 30-39
    436 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 3:55 pm
    @NottaSpy

    Let me say first of all I don`t believe time travel is possible. That said, If I somehow did come across a working time machine I would absolutely do crap like that just to see if anyone would notice several decades later. Sure there are better uses for it but this would be funny as hell to do.
  44. Profile photo of IMEVIL666
    IMEVIL666 Female 18-29
    80 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 4:00 pm
    even if the `time traveler` exsisted how would ANY portable electronic work? there were no satellites at that time, unless the object she was holding worked with just power lines.
  45. Profile photo of Chidori-san
    Chidori-san Female 18-29
    105 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 4:04 pm
    has anyone else noted the blondy and her obvious disdain for all of this? you can see she`s going, "Oh my Lord, shut the heck up. I don`t CARE!" she even rolled her eyes....
  46. Profile photo of thubanstar
    thubanstar Female 50-59
    815 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 4:10 pm
    Ok, so, she was stranded back in time as a young, lovely woman who had taken a time travel trip and was forgotten or lost...

    As the years wore on, though, she realized she had no one she could really connect with. Her beliefs were so different from everyone around her! Slowly she started to loose her mind and spoke into one of the few items she brought from the future, her cell phone.

    There! Problem solved.
  47. Profile photo of Red_Fear
    Red_Fear Male 18-29
    68 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 4:14 pm
    I`m pretty sure time travel isn`t logically possible until you have a time machine yourself. Read Asimov.

    Now lets think about it,
    Tache - tick
    Bowler - tick
    Cane - tick
    Time Machine - no I don`t think that was one of Charlie`s trademarks
  48. Profile photo of im_smart
    im_smart Male 18-29
    99 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 4:34 pm
    maybe its a drating movie that`s why she did that
  49. Profile photo of Fleaman1797
    Fleaman1797 Male 18-29
    718 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 4:47 pm
    They Live, we Sleep.
  50. Profile photo of BigWaFuu
    BigWaFuu Male 18-29
    1163 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 5:04 pm
    A cellphone wouldnt have worked in 1928 even if Jesus himself was sporting one. People are idiots.
  51. Profile photo of blackcatseye
    blackcatseye Female 30-39
    685 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 5:15 pm
    She may have been speaking into one of those Farnsworth devices from Warehouse 13. Or, this device explains it for I-A-B users outside the US. Duh. watch?v=UZdScksh4WE
  52. Profile photo of SarahofBorg
    SarahofBorg Female 18-29
    3564 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 5:23 pm
    Saying some person in an old movie looks like they might be holding a cell phone just because they have their hand next to their ear is like saying Jesus looks like he`s playing a xylophone in the Last Supper painting.
  53. Profile photo of Dad4Life
    Dad4Life Male 50-59
    2067 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 5:48 pm
    This should be the dumbest story of 2010. Is that woman talking a cell phone? People are idiots.
  54. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 5:49 pm
    I scrutinized this video on another sight many times looking at all angles. I did not see the original film, but would like to see as this is a digital remake. However it appearers to be a type of software program that altered the woman. When you go to youtube to view. You will notice the man that comes into the frame first is taller than the woman. They both take the same path but if you notice the shadow on the wall behind. The woman`s shadow is taller than the man`s. Then as they pass behind the horse with the tree in the background. The shadows pass the base of the tree under the horse with the man`s shadow now being taller than the woman`s shadow both still following the same path. This is seems to be evident that the video has been altered.
  55. Profile photo of ajd121
    ajd121 Male 18-29
    625 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 6:12 pm
    Scott Bakula Reference wouldn`t work, only his consciousness leaped from time period to time period.
  56. Profile photo of shinichimaru
    shinichimaru Male 18-29
    65 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 6:39 pm
    sure, its REALLY far fetched, but to some degree couldn`t you believe this just a little? i mean is it dumb? yes! but damn what happened to imagination? so i suppose no one imagined what it would be like to time travel...so cynical people
  57. Profile photo of skipidydooda
    skipidydooda Male 13-17
    178 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 6:45 pm
    why the hell would a time traveler be using a cell phone?
  58. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 7:00 pm
    @schinichimaru
    Time Travel might be possible. However if such tech exists. The likely-hood of the need to personally expose such to cause contamination to the time line would not be necessary. We could just merely hide and observe. Come on to time travel in a Chaplin Movie? The mere presence of a future time traveler in a film would have consequences of changing history in the future already including yours and mine possibility of not being born to write this.
  59. Profile photo of hyeonkim0805
    hyeonkim0805 Male 18-29
    667 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 7:20 pm
    I hope it`s not an iphone.
  60. Profile photo of RubixCuban
    RubixCuban Male 18-29
    99 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 7:20 pm
    @handys are you dumb.. obviously when they walked past each other the angle of the lights changed and the height of their shadows changed
  61. Profile photo of akiiryuuha
    akiiryuuha Female 18-29
    69 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:06 pm
    Time travelers everywhen are laughing at Archaeologists, Evolutionists, and Paleontologists everywhere. Heehee!
  62. Profile photo of Shottyb
    Shottyb Male 18-29
    13 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:28 pm
    Remember this Post From a Long time Ago on IAB?? Can we explain this away with photoshop?? Its on the museums website
  63. Profile photo of splurbyburbl
    splurbyburbl Male 30-39
    2798 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:34 pm
    Firstly, that is a time traveler from 3124 on vacation.

    Secondly, all of you are complete morons.

    Secondly again, she really does have a tooth ache.

    Thirdly but should be fourthly, in the future, we can expect to find towerless cellphones that double as toothache pain desensitizers.

    How this is not common sense to you clowns is beyond me.

  64. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:37 pm
    Lol, what amazes me is that people are complaining that someone with advanced enough technology to travel in time needs a cell tower for their cell phone. The cell phones Doctor Who uses can call anywhere in space time without a tower.

    Guess I need to fire up the Wayback Machine and set it for 1928.
  65. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:41 pm
    Drat, Splurb beat me to pointing out the obvious.
  66. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:42 pm
    Oh man you mean its not really a time traveler that decided to be in an old Charlie Chaplin movie and show off their futuristic technology? im shocked
  67. Profile photo of w31rd0
    w31rd0 Female 13-17
    142 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 8:51 pm
    whooo ...would she be talking to?
  68. Profile photo of duffytoler
    duffytoler Male 40-49
    5196 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 9:04 pm
    LOL - Faux News taking it seriously, of course.
  69. Profile photo of zeebeedee
    zeebeedee Male 50-59
    614 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 9:04 pm
    Oh yes this explains it all so well.


    Not
  70. Profile photo of turbotong
    turbotong Male 18-29
    600 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 9:06 pm
    lol @ splurbyburbl,
    nicely done.
  71. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 9:12 pm
    @RubixCuban
    Excuse me dumb ass but the man entered the frame first as directed in the scene. He did not pass her as your proposing. even though he is slightly to her left he is the angle would not make that much different in height blowtard. Now get out your software program and measure both the angles and the distance.
  72. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 9:15 pm
    @Shottyb
    What museum is that?
  73. Profile photo of handys003
    handys003 Male 50-59
    2402 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 9:15 pm
    @RubixCuban
    Excuse me dumb ass but the man entered the frame first as directed in the scene. He did not pass her as your proposing. even though he is slightly to her left he is the angle would not make that much different in height blowtard. Now get out your software program and measure both the angles and the distance.
  74. Profile photo of hab_theory
    hab_theory Male 40-49
    10 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 10:06 pm
    Ok here`s my take.

    It`s 1920, no sound in ol Charlies movies, so really you can talk all you want on set.

    They want a woman for whatever reason in the shot but dont have one, so they ask ol Bob if he could dress up as one, but Bob doesnt look like a woman so they tell him to cover his face, Bob not being much of an actor, walks in the scene and ask`s "charlie is this good" because he can talk and it wont make any difference.

    Bob, Al . Willy insert your name...
  75. Profile photo of jtrebowski
    jtrebowski Male 40-49
    3348 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 10:07 pm
    Just to play devils advocate with those of you that have pointed out the old (and now tired) talking point about no cell phone towers back then...it is true we need towers....for now, anyways. Who`s to say the mystery lady is from our era? Maybe she`s from 3124 when, as we all know, cell towers will be unnecessary.
  76. Profile photo of xfactormunky
    xfactormunky Male 18-29
    116 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 10:11 pm
    1. who would she be talking to if she was the only one back then with a cell phone
    2. how would the cell phone be working without the sattelites and towers up everywhere to carry the signal
    3. i`m pretty sure by the we are advanced enough to time travel, cell phones are gonna be alot smaller and i dont think we will have to hold them up to our face like that to use them
  77. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 10:25 pm
    I still say there`s nothing there to indicate she was talking.

    The simplest explanation is that she was shading her eyes from the sun, and the "phone" is nothing more than the shadow of her hand on her face. The position of her fingers is consistent with rheumatoid arthritis.
  78. Profile photo of sbeelz
    sbeelz Male 30-39
    2868 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 11:18 pm
    Really? This is what passes for news right now? Really? Even for Fox News, this is retarded.
  79. Profile photo of mst3k
    mst3k Male 18-29
    79 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 11:28 pm
    the whole things faked.....charlie new he was going to make controversy and hired some women to do that in his video....its a huuggee hoax from the ground up.
  80. Profile photo of zakattack47
    zakattack47 Male 13-17
    15 posts
    November 1, 2010 at 11:42 pm
    reasonable to say shes a time traveler. Unreasonable to say shes blocking the sun from her face?
  81. Profile photo of Volsunga
    Volsunga Male 18-29
    1548 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 12:00 am
    How we know that its not a cell phone? Only living matter goes through the time machine.
  82. Profile photo of NDLOgan
    NDLOgan Male 30-39
    218 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 12:55 am
    Way to go with the spelling, IAB! FOX even has "... Mysterious Time Traveler" on the screen the whole time! Oh, let`s just spell it however we want.
  83. Profile photo of RyanF701
    RyanF701 Male 18-29
    2486 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 4:04 am
    I think the funniest arguments against this are:
    "THERE WEREN`T ANY TOWERS TO SUPPORT THE SIGNAL"
    and
    "SHE WOULD HAVE THE ONLY CELL PHONE"

    Really? If you have technology capable of ripping apart the time space continuum and sending you back in time on a whim.. You don`t think they would have a work around for cellphone towers? Or the ability to communicate from the time they came?

    Now, I`m not saying I believe this is a time traveler, Occam`s razor and everything.. but, at least give a good argument against it.
  84. Profile photo of CmdrBittles
    CmdrBittles Female 18-29
    1173 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 5:11 am
    Yeah...if you see the model of the hearing aid they are talking about, it`s shaped kind of like a cell phone...and you hold it just like that.
  85. Profile photo of kirstoner
    kirstoner Female 18-29
    535 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 5:39 am
    not available in my country wtf?!
  86. Profile photo of Handsompod
    Handsompod Male 30-39
    1109 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 6:19 am
    NDLOgan, yes lets spell it correctly. Are you trolling or stupid?
  87. Profile photo of meepmaker
    meepmaker Male 30-39
    6694 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 7:44 am
    Still no Fluxcopacitor.
  88. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 9:03 am
    If a person can travel through goddamn time, don`t you think they`d already know beforehand to avoid being filmed and getting caught my future stupids?

    Just a thought.
  89. Profile photo of Cartunze
    Cartunze Male 60-69
    841 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 9:46 am
    Only Faux news would put this up as an actual news story.
  90. Profile photo of Damon5150
    Damon5150 Male 18-29
    9 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 10:06 am
    @Pooptart

    If a person can travel through time, you`d think they would know their cell phone wouldn`t work without the invention and creation of the cell towers... just a thought
  91. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 10:08 am
    @Pooptart

    If a person can travel through time, you`d think they would know their cell phone wouldn`t work without the invention and creation of the cell towers... just a thought
    That too.
  92. Profile photo of dang007
    dang007 Male 30-39
    596 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 11:51 am
    The problem is that after this came to light the time travelers went back in time and altered it by introducing the hearing aid thing. Now we have a good explanation for what she was doing. Time travelers will always trick us......
  93. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3435 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 7:50 pm
    Time Travel!? Really?! OCCAM`S RAZOR PEOPLE! Let`s consider logical realistic and likely options FIRST then start speculating about absurd bull$#!+
  94. Profile photo of PreoSmo
    PreoSmo Female 18-29
    472 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 8:44 pm
    Cartunze: have you seen CNN lately?
  95. Profile photo of TheiaRenown
    TheiaRenown Female 18-29
    426 posts
    November 2, 2010 at 10:00 pm
    It`s either that, or we`ve regressed to large bulkly cellphones again in the future
  96. Profile photo of hi2pi
    hi2pi Male 30-39
    736 posts
    November 3, 2010 at 12:09 am
    omg
    fox strikes again
  97. Profile photo of Byrdman1525
    Byrdman1525 Male 13-17
    107 posts
    November 3, 2010 at 4:59 am
    random coincidence is thousands of times more probably than time travel. and humans will never travel back in time for two reasons. 1. it`s impossible (as of now, only going forward is theoretically correct). 2. it would completely alter the future with what is known as `The Butterfly effect`. note that this is an effect, not a theory, meaning it WILL occur with backwards time travel.
  98. Profile photo of SvampeBob
    SvampeBob Male 18-29
    3076 posts
    November 3, 2010 at 5:29 am
    come on wtf this video is not available in your country. drat you youtube this is just bullpoo FUUUUuuuu, any way I don`t think that they would bring a cellphone that you need to hold at least hands free??? and time travel to the past is theoretically physically impossible. the radio signal is going..where?? to the future HAHAHA stupid news getting stupider
  99. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    November 3, 2010 at 1:47 pm
    "not available in my country wtf?!"

    You really think we are going to let you see our future time travel technology?
  100. Profile photo of MrPeabody
    MrPeabody Male 30-39
    1920 posts
    November 3, 2010 at 2:09 pm
    Actually I`m surprised that no one has come to the obvious conclusion that she is an Alien and is communicating with the mother ship.
  101. Profile photo of MaruDashi
    MaruDashi Female 18-29
    236 posts
    November 4, 2010 at 11:38 am
    @Byrdman- yes, the butterfly effect has already happened. Because this person went back in time, Bush became president....twice
  102. Profile photo of tugsalot
    tugsalot Male 18-29
    8 posts
    November 4, 2010 at 7:36 pm
    @Maru Win
  103. Profile photo of 8BitHero
    8BitHero Male 18-29
    5414 posts
    December 15, 2010 at 3:23 pm
    I wanna view it but it`s blocked or...something :/

Leave a Reply