Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 69    Average: 3.8/5]
121 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 47871
Rating: 3.8
Category: Funny
Date: 10/05/10 01:01 PM

121 Responses to Proof That There Is A God [Gif]

  1. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 11:38 am
    Link: Proof That There Is A God - She`s waiting at the pearly gates?
  2. Profile photo of CoeshCoesh
    CoeshCoesh Male 13-17
    131 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:06 pm
    This looks more like proof of good plastic surgeons. =D
  3. Profile photo of BoredFrank
    BoredFrank Male 40-49
    2211 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:11 pm
    Say HALLELUJAH! Glory!
  4. Profile photo of Oblivia
    Oblivia Female 18-29
    812 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:13 pm
    Looks like a shot from a porn...
  5. Profile photo of Maksie99
    Maksie99 Male 18-29
    695 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:14 pm
    Oh look, it`s that chick from 5 second films.
  6. Profile photo of Norris
    Norris Male 18-29
    1011 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:17 pm

  7. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:23 pm
    Yup, that is what heaven looks to me too
  8. Profile photo of Fuego
    Fuego Male 40-49
    1287 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:24 pm
    So.....is this Saint Petra? I got some pearl jam for her pearly gate.
  9. Profile photo of donthaveone
    donthaveone Male 30-39
    953 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:24 pm
    "This looks more like proof of good plastic surgeons. =D"


    Looks pretty natural to me... but then again... Who cares.
  10. Profile photo of IamBored29
    IamBored29 Male 18-29
    648 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:27 pm
    I see no proof.
  11. Profile photo of NDLOgan
    NDLOgan Male 30-39
    218 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:28 pm
    No, this would be my hell.
  12. Profile photo of idiotfilter
    idiotfilter Male 18-29
    3916 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:32 pm
    i thought the same thing oblivia...lol

    so nice though...
  13. Profile photo of rainbowfarts
    rainbowfarts Female 18-29
    798 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:36 pm
    @donthaveone
    I was thinking the same thing. Those puppies have way too much movement to be fake
  14. Profile photo of Lblaxplaya20
    Lblaxplaya20 Male 18-29
    422 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:42 pm
    @NDLOgan
    By that I assume that you mean you`re gay, in which case you may already be going to Hell already. The old testament of the Bible states that a man sleeping with another man is an abomination. Of course you may still have a place on Heaven due to the mercy of God.

    If you are not gay, please disregard.
  15. Profile photo of B-b-beccah
    B-b-beccah Female 18-29
    668 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:43 pm
    "Whoa! Is this heaven?"
    "No..."
    "Aw."
    "Just kiddin! You can touch em."
    "Yay!"
  16. Profile photo of Mailbox
    Mailbox Male 18-29
    255 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:56 pm
    Ahh...come on! the wings are obviously fake!! like you gonna trick me.. I dont think so!
    good day sir.
  17. Profile photo of idiotfilter
    idiotfilter Male 18-29
    3916 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 1:56 pm
    lblaxplaya....nobody cares go away....bible thumper....they`re boobs with a subtle subtext of Christianity...focus on the boobs.....

    ...focus on the boobs
  18. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:02 pm
    @NDLOgan
    By that I assume that you mean you`re gay, in which case you may already be going to Hell already. The old testament of the Bible states that a man sleeping with another man is an abomination. Of course you may still have a place on Heaven due to the mercy of God.
    Leviticus 18:22 right? What about Leviticus 20:13? Do you also follow that? What about eating shellfish? Stoning a woman to death if she`s found not to be a virgin on her wedding day?

    Yeah, the Old Testament is full of sh*t like that, so be a doll, take your "Holy" Bible and f*ck off.
  19. Profile photo of RG900
    RG900 Male 18-29
    250 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:03 pm
    haha her boobs just made me smile :)
  20. Profile photo of pdjr
    pdjr Male 40-49
    298 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:04 pm
    lord I`m cummin`
  21. Profile photo of SkyeDragon
    SkyeDragon Female 18-29
    281 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:07 pm
    Pooptart19 - You win. :3
  22. Profile photo of
    Northernwolf
    304 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:11 pm
    @Lblaxplaya20 How can he go to either when they do not exist =P
  23. Profile photo of Skillet28
    Skillet28 Male 18-29
    3 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:26 pm
    @Pooptart19

    Galatians 3:23. Christians aren`t bound by Old Testament law, but rather are led by Christ. Whether it be stoning people or eating shellfish, those are old testament laws meant for the Jews of that time.
  24. Profile photo of Maksie99
    Maksie99 Male 18-29
    695 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:27 pm
    In case anyone wanted the sauce
  25. Profile photo of icfire504
    icfire504 Male 13-17
    341 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:28 pm
    Pooptart19 - you are my hero of the day
  26. Profile photo of D3rAnG3d
    D3rAnG3d Male 18-29
    1598 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:39 pm
    Why is this not rated higher? There must be some people that don`t like boobies :/
  27. Profile photo of Ace_Mazta
    Ace_Mazta Male 13-17
    699 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:39 pm
    I BELIEVE
  28. Profile photo of davidstone
    davidstone Male 18-29
    92 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:46 pm
    The Old Testament laws were created by man, with the exception of the Ten Commandments. Then Jesus came and made sure they knew that, shortening the Ten into two; love G-d and love your neighbor. Being gay is not technically ever addressed by G-d Himself, or Jesus, so saying that it`s a sin to be gay is like saying it`s also a sin to wear fabrics (Leviticus 19:19). Which neither is, by the way, just so you get the point.
  29. Profile photo of paddy215
    paddy215 Male 18-29
    1677 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:52 pm
    Sack the pearly gates, I wanna give her a pearly necklace
  30. Profile photo of davidstone
    davidstone Male 18-29
    92 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:54 pm
    The Old Testament laws were created by man, with the exception of the Ten Commandments. Then Jesus came and made sure they knew that, shortening the Ten into two; love G-d and love your neighbor. Being gay is not technically ever addressed by G-d Himself, or Jesus, so saying that it`s a sin to be gay is like saying it`s also a sin to wear fabrics (Leviticus 19:19). Which neither is, by the way, just so you get the point.
  31. Profile photo of Mainframe
    Mainframe Male 40-49
    43 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:55 pm
    Do you think that she`s one of the 72 virgins awaiting the suicide bombers? Could be but I doubt it.
  32. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 2:59 pm
    @Pooptart19

    Galatians 3:23. Christians aren`t bound by Old Testament law, but rather are led by Christ. Whether it be stoning people or eating shellfish, those are old testament laws meant for the Jews of that time.
    Skillet28, you can pick and choose whatever verses you want to support either position. Want to be a chickensh*t Christian and say you don`t need to follow OT laws to make yourself look better? There are verses for you! Want to stick your holy d*ck into the lives of others and claim they`re gonna burn forever because of the OT laws? There are verses for you!
  33. Profile photo of NotTHATbored
    NotTHATbored Female 18-29
    1101 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:05 pm
    I`m sorry this is just not as good as Katy Perry. Try harder I-A-B.
  34. Profile photo of duffytoler
    duffytoler Male 40-49
    5196 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:05 pm
    All that, and a dick, too.
    (angels are guys)
  35. Profile photo of Skillet28
    Skillet28 Male 18-29
    3 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:19 pm
    @ Pooptart19

    1. I never said anything about anyone burning in hell. Not once did I attack anyone on this site. You assumed from my post that I was Christian and therefore jumped to the false conclusion that I must be here to judge everyone and condemn them.
    2. I`m not trying to make myself "look better". Just as you used quotes from the Bible to prove your point, I am pointing out how Christians are commanded to follow Christ and are not restricted to the law.
  36. Profile photo of han5nah
    han5nah Female 13-17
    735 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:21 pm
    THOU SHALT NOT LUST, THOUGH SHALT NOT LUUUST!
  37. Profile photo of ElMustache
    ElMustache Male 18-29
    1625 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:36 pm
    Why are you debating the bible when there`s bouncing tits? *SMH*
  38. Profile photo of Inter237
    Inter237 Male 18-29
    2441 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:43 pm
    boobs
  39. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:47 pm
    Galatians 3:23. Christians aren`t bound by Old Testament law, but rather are led by Christ. Whether it be stoning people or eating shellfish, those are old testament laws meant for the Jews of that time.

    Matthew 5:17-18 - "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."

    That`s Jesus himself saying that he is not abolishing the OT laws.
  40. Profile photo of Smokeylove11
    Smokeylove11 Female 13-17
    290 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 3:53 pm
    Oh, 5SecondFilms, what have ye done?
  41. Profile photo of OsirisXero
    OsirisXero Male 40-49
    38 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 4:04 pm
    So I got this straight: IAB posts a gif of an angelic woman with big breasts (which I hardly think the reasoning behind that need be explained), and the first thing some of these people who see it feel the need to do is quote scripture....? Wow, some people need a soapbox to express their self-righteous piety, THAT bad...
  42. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 4:09 pm
    The Old Testament laws were created by man, with the exception of the Ten Commandments.
    Incorrect. Read Leviticus 18:1 - "And the Lord spake unto Moses".

    All the commands in Leviticus 18 are direct commands from God. God gave them to Moses, and Moses told them to everyone else. Just like he did with the 10 Commandments.

    You`ll notice that the same thing comes up throughout Leviticus, for example Leviticus 19:1 shows that the instructions are clearly coming from God, who then says in Lev 19:19 not to wear clothes from two types of material.

    They are ALL commands direct from God.
  43. Profile photo of junkaddy
    junkaddy Female 30-39
    261 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 4:29 pm
    I think if the Christian church condoned more stuff like this, they`d get more followers. Bibles and boobs, I think a lot of people could go for that. Or bibles and balls for the women.
  44. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25408 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 4:32 pm
    Cool, made me smile!
  45. Profile photo of defiythelie
    defiythelie Male 18-29
    230 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 5:23 pm
    No No No this is not proof of heaven. If it was she would be naked and there would be about an infinite number of her.

    OOO and LOL at all the ignoramuses arguing scripture as if it was true.
  46. Profile photo of defiythelie
    defiythelie Male 18-29
    230 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 5:26 pm
    " Galatians 3:23. Christians aren`t bound by Old Testament law, but rather are led by Christ. Whether it be stoning people or eating shellfish, those are old testament laws meant for the Jews of that time."

    Yeah that must be why some christians believe in the adam and eve story or the creation stroy right? F#$k!ng idiot.

  47. Profile photo of tylertooo
    tylertooo Male 40-49
    240 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 5:34 pm
    Uh, I think I`d better start behaving...
  48. Profile photo of bhme33
    bhme33 Female 13-17
    9 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 5:49 pm
    i dont think God wants 2 c his angels boobies shakin ound like that(or wood he?)
  49. Profile photo of slbtiger
    slbtiger Female 30-39
    105 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 5:51 pm
    " Galatians 3:23. Christians aren`t bound by Old Testament law, but rather are led by Christ. Whether it be stoning people or eating shellfish, those are old testament laws meant for the Jews of that time."

    "Yeah that must be why some christians believe in the adam and eve story or the creation stroy right? F#$k!ng idiot."

    Adam and Eve, and the Creation story, aren`t laws.
  50. Profile photo of bmh
    bmh Female 18-29
    248 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 5:56 pm
    lame
  51. Profile photo of pui
    pui Female 18-29
    3575 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 6:04 pm
    lol
  52. Profile photo of MitchMcCaw
    MitchMcCaw Male 13-17
    31 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 6:21 pm
    "i dont think God wants 2 c his angels boobies shakin ound like that(or wood he?)"

    I don`t think God wants to see his mentally retarded children trying to type. Or would he?
  53. Profile photo of teampink27
    teampink27 Female 18-29
    533 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 6:26 pm
    my milkshake brings all the boys to the gate
  54. Profile photo of obhwfgirl
    obhwfgirl Female 18-29
    582 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 6:56 pm
    "I don`t think God wants to see his mentally retarded children trying to type. Or would he?"

    Hey now, if god didn`t want to see that, he wouldn`t have created mental disabilities.
  55. Profile photo of GuardinGnome
    GuardinGnome Male 18-29
    2893 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:05 pm
    I`m lovin` these booby shakin` Gifs.
    BRING IT ONNNNN!!!!!
  56. Profile photo of Stormydreams
    Stormydreams Female 18-29
    160 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:16 pm
    Those extra feathers by her right wing are freaking me out!
  57. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:22 pm
    almightybob1: Why don`t you show the whole passage of Matthew 5, Jesus states his commandments and interpretation of the law. Matthew 5 - Jesus` commandments.

    Jesus does not say that we should follow mosaic law, In fact he simplifies the law. Jesus fulfilled the law with his sacrifice for us on the cross and gave to us a new covenant replacing mosaic law.
  58. Profile photo of Arandanos
    Arandanos Female 18-29
    223 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:23 pm
    Oh hi leftie~ Greetings righty~ may I motorboat you, darlings? thanks <3
  59. Profile photo of MauserTM
    MauserTM Male 18-29
    1222 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:29 pm
    Fake
  60. Profile photo of Kaagan
    Kaagan Male 18-29
    1596 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:50 pm
    i see you are enticed by my daughters awesome boobage
  61. Profile photo of kushking
    kushking Male 18-29
    90 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 7:55 pm
    i think i died and when to heaven
  62. Profile photo of Toider
    Toider Male 18-29
    452 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 8:01 pm
    the jubbly gates
  63. Profile photo of Nocciolina
    Nocciolina Female 18-29
    1623 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 8:11 pm
    "Then I saw her boobs, now I`m a believer
    not a trace of doubt in my mind"
  64. Profile photo of Wai-Yu
    Wai-Yu Female 13-17
    246 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 9:04 pm
    probably the most jiggly boobs i have ever seen....
  65. Profile photo of xxPinkxx
    xxPinkxx Female 18-29
    3830 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 9:04 pm
    holy crap i this ever mesmerizing.
  66. Profile photo of xxPinkxx
    xxPinkxx Female 18-29
    3830 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 9:05 pm
    *is
  67. Profile photo of Ani187
    Ani187 Female 30-39
    4448 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 9:05 pm
    Stop hypnotizing me with tits, IAB. >.<
  68. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 9:41 pm
    almightybob1: Why don`t you show the whole passage of Matthew 5
    Because I didn`t have room, and you can`t quote and link in the same post.

    Jesus does not say that we should follow mosaic law
    Please explain how Matthew 5:17-18 could possibly be interpreted as Jesus saying anything other than "Don`t think the old laws are written off, because they`re not, not until heaven and earth pass".

    And when I read Matthew 5:19, I again see Jesus saying "if you break these small commandments you will be called least to heaven, but if you follow them you`ll get in". Again, telling me to obey the least commandments of the law and the prophets he just mentioned.

    And again, Matthew 5:20, he tells me to be as righteous as a Pharisee, who were the people who strictly followed all 400+ rules in the OT. I have to be even more rigidly adherent than the most rigidly adherent believers.


    Looks like Jesus does wan
  69. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 9:46 pm
    ... want me to follow OT law.


    The best you could POSSIBLY say is that Jesus immediately contradicts himself by giving instructions that disagree with a few of the OT laws. But that`s hardly an encouraging line of argument, Jesus giving confusing, poorly explained instructions on moral issues. Some poor schmuck might pick the wrong interpretation and condemn themselves to hell!

    Can an ultimate source of morality contradict itself?
  70. Profile photo of NotTHATbored
    NotTHATbored Female 18-29
    1101 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 10:25 pm
    "i dont think God wants 2 c his angels boobies shakin ound like that(or wood he?)"

    "Wood" he? LOL!
  71. Profile photo of flingspoo
    flingspoo Female 18-29
    999 posts
    October 5, 2010 at 10:47 pm
    @ almightybob: Thank you for giving me something to think about :-)
  72. Profile photo of Salted_Eggs
    Salted_Eggs Male 18-29
    774 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:08 am
    I always enjoy a good levelheaded post.
    Hats off to you AlmightyBob.

    (This is my 666th post)
    o:-)}-)
  73. Profile photo of jaRv1s
    jaRv1s Male 18-29
    28 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:08 am
    that`s angel with tits not god...
  74. Profile photo of BigMordecai
    BigMordecai Male 18-29
    94 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:24 am
    @almightybob1
    I argue that ultimate morality must contradict itself in the strictest sense but not in a hypothetical sense. The language usage however is not strict which must be understood. This brings up the interesting situation of interpretation, while old wisdom should not be thrown away, maybe they can be edited in some places. Maybe it meant his rules don`t stand on its own. I dont care that much. Two primary points are true: it is highly interpretable so the meaning becomes a reflection of the person and social forces. This is freedom of thought.
    Now to support my previous statement. Languages and interpretations and human reasoning are limited (not complete). An ultimate morality must provide an answer to every question which is in every case correct. Assuming it exists (right and wrong), there exists some question which must due to limited language cannot be expressed differently and thus two answers may exist for the same answer. Therefore morality is contradi
  75. Profile photo of BayneZaney
    BayneZaney Male 18-29
    32 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:28 am
    @jaRv1s: you have GOT to be kidding me! *facepalm*
  76. Profile photo of Lauryn
    Lauryn Female 18-29
    437 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 1:28 am
    jaRv1s
    Male, 18-29, Asia
    17 Posts Wednesday, October 6, 2010 12:08:47 AM
    that`s angel with tits not god...

    OMG!! That made me LOL till i had tears!!

    I have so many comments to make but im being nice and holding my tounge... and hoping its because english is not ur first language
  77. Profile photo of jeepjones
    jeepjones Male 30-39
    554 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 2:34 am
    I would so hit that and enjoy the trip to hell.
  78. Profile photo of ruthless1990
    ruthless1990 Female 18-29
    3001 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 5:34 am
    hahaa jaRv1s, i know everyone else has already said but your comment is fail XD
  79. Profile photo of smithno13
    smithno13 Male 18-29
    252 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 5:55 am
    Looks like the beginning of a cheesy porno that would send me straight to hell.
  80. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 7:25 am
    almightybob1: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

    Jesus fulfilled the OT when he died on the cross. Jesus did change the law, and the rest of Matthew 5 shows that.

    The trinity existed before Jesus was born, The Father, The Word, and The Spirit. It says in the bible that Jesus was `The Word` made flesh, Therefore Jesus is the law.

    Jesus later says `No one comes to the father but by me`. In Matthew 5 he is laying the foundation of the soon-to-be new covenant, He simplifies the law. He then fulfills the law with his sacrifice.

    Get it ?
  81. Profile photo of panth753
    panth753 Female 18-29
    9186 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:06 am
    "Looks like the beginning of a cheesy porno that would send me straight to hell."

    I know right.
  82. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:24 am
    Jesus fulfilled the OT when he died on the cross.
    Fair enough, that could be the "till all is fulfilled" part. But in that sentence Jesus (confusingly) cites two very different `end conditions` if you will.
    "Till all is fulfilled", OK I can see how the dying-for-our-sins thing could be that.
    "Till heaven and earth pass" has clearly not happened. We`re still here, on Earth. And I`m assured that heaven is still there too.

    How do the two different end conditions interact? What logic function do we apply? Is it an OR or an AND? Jesus never makes that clear.

    Also, the Bible says (1 Peter 1:24-25) "The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever."

    But how can the word of God endure forever if, as you point out, Jesus (= God = Holy Spirit) changes the rules?

    All that means is that the word of God stands temporarily, until he changes his m
  83. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:24 am
    ... his mind. That`s not ultimate morality.
  84. Profile photo of TheTumor
    TheTumor Male 18-29
    552 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:38 am
    .....Aaaand then the GIF is imediatley ruined by a religious debate. Thanks guys.
  85. Profile photo of god_zito
    god_zito Male 18-29
    11 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:55 am
    WHERE IS THIS FROM??? ANSWER PLEASE....
  86. Profile photo of Skillet28
    Skillet28 Male 18-29
    3 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:57 am
    @ almightybob

    It is impossible to stay true to old testament laws. Humans are flawed and fall short of it constantly, hence the need in Jewish tradition for cleansing and sacrifice in order to be made pure again. The laws show the human need for redemption. Romans 10:4 along with Ephesians 2:15 support that. Just as Jesus is the Word, he is the law himself. The purpose of the laws was to lead to Christ as is said in Galatians 3:24 "So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith".
  87. Profile photo of GiveChase
    GiveChase Female 18-29
    535 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 9:07 am
    It`s a trap!!
  88. Profile photo of DixxyRarr
    DixxyRarr Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 9:57 am
    paddy215: HA! That comment was definitely the best :)
  89. Profile photo of
    Northernwolf
    304 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 9:57 am
    Wanna know what makes me angry?

    I can`t come on IAB and look at a nice set of ta tas because of you people!!!

    Why the hell should we care who is right and who is wrong when we have a pair of head lights shining their divine light at us?

    If we could all just get along with eachother and keep our personal opinion about how life came to be or if there is or is not a God then we could all live in harmony

    That in itself would be a miracle

    To you Christians/whatever is it your problem if someone goes to heaven or hell or is it between God and that person?

    To you Athiest/Whatever does it really matter that the Christians/whatever believe in somthing no differant than Santa Claus as long as they are happy?

    All I can say is lets give peace a chance

    IMO in the end it doesn`t matter who gives the better argument we still will never know the truth of what is real and what isn`t

    I`m Northernwolf and I aprove this mes
  90. Profile photo of
    Northernwolf
    304 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 10:00 am
    p.s those are nice melons
  91. Profile photo of RyanHake
    RyanHake Male 18-29
    2690 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 10:11 am
    I definitely wasn`t expecting that ha
  92. Profile photo of NottaSpy
    NottaSpy Male 40-49
    881 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 10:32 am
    Weighing this against spending an eternity with people like CrakrJak? I`ll stick with eternal damnation.
  93. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 10:42 am
    It is impossible to stay true to old testament laws.
    It obviously isn`t. The Pharisees did it just fine.

    Besides, it`s equally impossible to stay true to Jesus` new covenant too. Thinking someone other than your wife is attractive is adultery? It seems thoughtcrime wasn`t invented by Orwell after all.

    And why would a loving God create a ruleset that is impossible for the subjects of that ruleset to follow? That would be like a human demanding that their pet dog either write out the proof of Pythagoras` Theorem from first principles, or continually seek forgiveness for not being able to do so.

    Romans 10:4 along with Ephesians 2:15 support that.
    Then tell me, why did Jesus himself say to obey the least of the commandments? Why did say to be more righteous than a Pharisee, who showed their righteousness by following all those laws?
  94. Profile photo of Musuko42
    Musuko42 Male 18-29
    2850 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 10:55 am
    "To you Athiest/Whatever does it really matter that the Christians/whatever believe in somthing no differant than Santa Claus as long as they are happy?"

    Because people don`t fly planes into buildings in the name of Santa Claus.
  95. Profile photo of RecycleElf
    RecycleElf Male 18-29
    3622 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 11:04 am
    Yay 5secfilms! :)

    i was the first to post a 5secfilm short on iab actually... those guys are on the God-tier with google :D
  96. Profile photo of lazerdude
    lazerdude Male 13-17
    221 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 11:27 am
    Theres probably some 82 year old man having a good time watching that. Nah wait, he likes little childen doesnt he.
  97. Profile photo of shpook
    shpook Male 18-29
    68 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 11:41 am
    LOL, this post is about TATAs, not religion. I don`t give a damn if she was Buddhist, those are some bouncy TATAs.
  98. Profile photo of BigMordecai
    BigMordecai Male 18-29
    94 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:03 pm
    @almightybob
    I gave a proof showing your point is moot and simultaneously everyone who argues with you.
    You are using a proof by contradiction (though it is not very rigorous), assuming that a correct religion is defined by an ultimate morality which is consistent. I defined it following some arguments of everyone`s and a very very general definition for rigor. Every situation/question possible has a right or wrong answer. What I forgot to write was that there is more than one answer or possible action, ie morality does not give the trivial answer set only of having no permutations. Your proof of contradiction by having two inconsistent -written- or communicated statements is moot by the fact that my proof shows that any lingual expression of an ultimate morality as defined using fundamental assumptions, must have a lingual contradiction so your point carries no meaning.
  99. Profile photo of britt566
    britt566 Female 18-29
    2291 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:39 pm
    booooooobies
  100. Profile photo of Solvent
    Solvent Male 18-29
    2842 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:41 pm
    It truly is sad how some people would rather argue about religion instead of looking at boobies.
  101. Profile photo of britt566
    britt566 Female 18-29
    2291 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:42 pm
    "GOD is REAL!"

    "I DISAGREE!"


    There now STOP and agree to disagree.
  102. Profile photo of BrimstoneOne
    BrimstoneOne Male 30-39
    2229 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:44 pm
    That is a really nice wiggle shes got
  103. Profile photo of mithraela
    mithraela Female 18-29
    535 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:46 pm
    It wouldn`t jerk like that if the person who made it pasted the reverse of this to the end of it.
  104. Profile photo of
    Northernwolf
    304 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 12:51 pm
    JUST LOOK AT THE BOOBS YOU TWITS!
  105. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 1:39 pm
    @BigMordecai
    Your proof (although I wouldn`t call anything either of us has said proofs, they only exist in maths) relies on your assertion that it is impossible to convey meaning through human language for every situation. You do not demonstrate that this is the case.
    You also fail to demonstrate that an incomplete language would inevitably result in directly contradicting answers to the same question.

    Further, your assertion that God could not do something (here, accurately convey his moral code) is nonsensical. By definition, God is omnipotent. There is nothing he cannot do. Language would be no impediment to an omnipotent being. Hell, he could just hardwire the moral code into our brains.

    So no, the argument is not moot. Your fundamental assumptions are flawed.
  106. Profile photo of Armond
    Armond Male 18-29
    50 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 1:56 pm
    "By definition, God is omnipotent. There is nothing he cannot do."

    Can an unstoppable force make an unmovable object?
  107. Profile photo of Discobiscuit
    Discobiscuit Male 18-29
    542 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 3:57 pm
    Armond, you just went full retard.
  108. Profile photo of collegebound
    collegebound Male 18-29
    3745 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 4:59 pm
    ITS A TRAP!!!!
  109. Profile photo of flyingpie
    flyingpie Male 13-17
    472 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 5:33 pm
    well said northernwolf
  110. Profile photo of Koner_Rox
    Koner_Rox Male 18-29
    112 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 6:58 pm
    @Armond
    Facepalm
  111. Profile photo of SarahColleen
    SarahColleen Female 18-29
    1071 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 7:48 pm
    I think I just became a lesbian... those things are...mesmerizing... look at them go. I`m hypnotized..
  112. Profile photo of Armond
    Armond Male 18-29
    50 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:04 pm
    @Disco, Konoer, if a being is omnipotent, he should be able to do anything, right? Shouldn`t that also include being able to create anything? (There`s even biblical precedent for that - god apparently created a ton of water and flooded the world.) An immovable object should then fall under the category of "things" and thus "things an omnipotent being could create". But an omnipotent being should be able to move any object. Thus the flaw of omnipotence, and why I believe it doesn`t exist.
  113. Profile photo of
    Northernwolf
    304 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 8:48 pm
    @SarahColleen THE POWER OF TITS COMPELS YOU!
  114. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    October 6, 2010 at 9:30 pm
    Somehow I think she should be stiring chocolate milk
  115. Profile photo of chesspoly
    chesspoly Male 18-29
    10 posts
    October 7, 2010 at 12:38 pm
    omnipotence doesn`t necessarily entail being able to do everything. there are lots of things God can`t do and still be omnipotent. God can`t sin. God cannot cease to exist. God cannot be imperfect. Basically, God cannot do anything contrary to his nature. You would expect something like God to be consistent in this manner. So when you say if God can create an immovable object, it`s an incoherent objection. Its saying well a perfect being could be not perfect. it just doesn`t make any sense to say something like that. so its not a refutation of any kind.

    but i don`t see how you could say there is no God when there are jugs like that. If there is no God, then there is no beauty. But these are amazing. therefore, God exists.
  116. Profile photo of Bacir
    Bacir Male 18-29
    13 posts
    October 7, 2010 at 5:39 pm
    I could be wrong here, but isn`t it some sort of blasphemy to claim to know the nature of god?
  117. Profile photo of Bacir
    Bacir Male 18-29
    13 posts
    October 7, 2010 at 5:47 pm
    And either way, it is impossible for god to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, as is so commonly preached. It boils down to the problem of evil.
    If God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, then how is there evil in the world?
  118. Profile photo of ROK9
    ROK9 Male 18-29
    1834 posts
    October 10, 2010 at 6:28 pm
    yes please
  119. Profile photo of meepmaker
    meepmaker Male 30-39
    6694 posts
    October 19, 2010 at 1:00 pm
    It moved.
  120. Profile photo of PringleMan
    PringleMan Female 13-17
    1356 posts
    October 30, 2010 at 8:24 pm
    what are you doing discussing god!? look at her boobs! she has boobs! moving boobs! don`t bring all of the problems of god and religion here, you won`t get any of the answers you want any way.

Leave a Reply