Your Sunday Bible Message [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 7 years ago in Misc

Fairly ballsy for the Good Book, no?
There are 133 comments:
Female 40
ii love IAB but they shud really keep this kinda stuff off here.. ppl get to heated n everything jus goes down hill...
0
Reply
Female 1,236
@ kitw90--hilarious!!!
I`ve always wondered what the world (or my life) would look like if every single commandment, rule, law, & suggestion from the Bible was followed & acted out in our modern day setting. Hmmm...(**dream sequence) Chapter 1--PTPete is stoned for being an unclean harlot who engages in...speech.
Nevermind.
0
Reply
Male 3,058
@ dax2009: So no response to my fulfilling your request for a passage condoning slavery? You asked for one passage, I provided four, and can direct you to more if you need them.

But you won`t.

Like most brainwashed "Christians", you refuse to accept that your holiest text is filled with contradictions, and the laws of men trying to consolidate their power.

Not God.

Like most Christians, you talk a good game, but your knowledge of the "Holy" Bible is so weak that you have no way to counter anyone who DOES know the Bible, and points out that YOU don`t know what the book contains.

Perhaps you should try actually READING it in it`s entirety instead of basing your knowledge on what you hear in "Church".

Thanks for playing.
0
Reply
Female 322
8BitHero: yes, many many Christian women abide by this, and have no shame in it, nor do they consider that it makes them less than a man. It is supposed to be an example to the world of the relationship that Christ has to His bridew, the church... He died for it, and a man is expected to die for his wife, if need be.
0
Reply
Female 322
Mat 19:8 "He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so." That pretty much covers slavery, also. Gd was dealing with real people in a real discourse. Slavery is with us now, and always has been. So has the poor. God doesn`t say being poor is right, either, but He gives directions for how to behave if you are poor or rich. Remember: Mat 19:30 "But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last [shall be] first." and what I said earlier - "there is no male or female, slave or freeman, Greek nor Jew, for all are one in Christ Jesus".
0
Reply
Male 5,413
Si, Christian females abide by this?
0
Reply
Male 794
its a book, that all there is to it, somebody will read some science fiction book (scientology) and start a religion, if enough people follow it 2000 years later then its a strong religion, either way its a book written by people, not GOD who decided to appear and translated it into GREEK so all the europeans can follow it, thats why i find south americans and a lot of african-americans to be hypocritical, since Christianity is a forced religion upon them, through submission and slavery, yet they so openly embrace it, that is my opinion if you dont like it thats your problem not mine
0
Reply
Male 3,058
CrakrJak: I reiterate, I studied the "Holy" Bible for many years. More than just the King James version. I`ll put my knowledge of that particular book up against anyone.

That being said, I am also aware of the fact that I am not the "final authority" on the "Holy" Bible.

I encourage anyone who is interested to study the book themselves, in as many translations as they can find, and draw their own conclusions.

0
Reply
Male 3,058
CrakrJak: Each of those verses condones slavery.

Therefore, slavery is sanctioned and approved of in the "Holy" Bible.

There are indeed several translations of the "Holy" Bible that substitute the word "servant" for "slave".

Those translations were made hundreds and in some cases thousands of years after they were originally written.

I offer you this verse as well:

"As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you." Deuteronomy 20:10-14
0
Reply
Male 17,511
osirisascend: None of those says `Slavery is a good thing`, and on several of those you (as many others do) substitute the word `servant` for `slave`.
0
Reply
Male 3,058
@ dax2009: You asked for one, I gave you FOUR.

I can show you many more if you`d like. The "Holy Bible" is rife with hypocrisy, contradictions, and the will of MAN, not God. For this reason I do not consider myself a "Christian" and left the organized church over 15 years ago.

By the way, I was ordained as a minister in the Church of God in Christ in 1988. I spent most of my formative years studying every translation of the "Holy Bible" I could get my hands on.

I am confident in the claim that I know the "Holy Bible" inside and out... better than most Bible "scholars" in fact.

I have NO PROBLEM sharing the lies and contradictions it contains with brainwashed sheep like yourself.

0
Reply
Male 3,058
@ dax2009: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Ephesians 6:5

"Tell slaves to be submissive to their masters and to give satisfaction in every respect; they are not to talk back, not to pilfer, but to show complete and perfect fidelity, so that in everything they may be an ornament to the doctrine of God our Savior." Titus 2:9-10

dax, I can show you more if you need them.

It`s quite obvious that you claim to be a "Christian", yet like most "Christians" you know nothing of your churches most "holy" text.

I happen to have been born into a family full of holier-than-thou "Christians" and ministers.

Perhaps you should try reading and comprehending what the book says before trying to claim what it DOESN`T say. You have no credibility.
0
Reply
Male 3,058
@ dax2009: "When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again... And if the slave girl`s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways she may leave as a free woman without making any payment." Exodus 21:7-11
0
Reply
Male 3,058
@ dax2009: "However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way." Leviticus 25:44-46

0
Reply
Female 40
ROTFLMFAO!!!

I love those wacky Christians with their crazy `god book`.

0
Reply
Male 10
Religion starting aggro?? well i never..
love the fact that this`ll be defended by a woman saying it means something else... i just want to have the bible open on this page and tap it at her as she does with raised eyebrows...
0
Reply
Male 703
@bonsushi - perfect! You got it, pal! Just the same as you take some governmental laws (murder and rape, I hope) literally, while assume that smoking weed and running the occasional red light doesn`t apply to you!
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Moefreak:
Moe, as I said, when arguing the specific meanings of words, the original text is vital. Sometimes, we don`t have the original text (Jesus was thought to speak Aramaic for example), but a single translation is superior to a second or third and so on.

Again, I have always said that, and it seems reasonable.

This brings up my earlier point of the text itself being OK, but the interpretations being a result of time and environment.

I actually agree to an extent with Xavroche. In fact his response to me is exactly what I was trying to say.

Though I stated the Bible included a Quran equivalent because of the Psalms which were the work of David (a Prophet), under the direction of God under Islamic tradition.

However that tradition isn`t present in Christianity, so I`ll revoke that statement.
0
Reply
Female 322
moefreak, please find me one passage in the bible that says that slavery is a good thing.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
moefreak: I don`t have a PHD in Theology, So I refer to the opinions of those scholars that do.
Most of them agree on the critical issues of the Bible and have done research on the rest. After all, They have vast resources available to them going back to the Dead Sea scrolls and even older.

So, I am not `interpret(ing) on behalf of anyone else`, I`m following the most accepted interpretations of experts of my denomination.
0
Reply
Male 204
OH I GET IT. I`m supposed to take the good parts of the Bible literally, and all the bad parts are just some sort of encrypted message that means something good in the end! Am I doin it rite?
0
Reply
Male 12
I want that in my wedding vows!
0
Reply
Female 1,071
Well.. I guess I`m not a Christian now...
0
Reply
Female 1,963
CrakrJak, you can ignore my point all you want. That doesn`t make it any less valid.

Do you, or do you not, believe that you have the right to interpret on behalf of anyone else which parts of the bible are to be taken at face value?
0
Reply
Male 17,511
moefreak: If you can`t be bothered to look and see the difference between slavery and servitude, Then you have no business lecturing literalness vs. figurative in the Bible to someone that does.
0
Reply
Female 1,963
CrakrJak, I don`t know what the original term was, but many (most?) editions of the bible have translated it as `slave`. And the fact that slavery was certainly discussed NOT in a manner that in any way suggested it was a bad thing is pretty undeniable.

And it isn`t just slavery. If there is any part of the bible that you don`t think is meant to be taken literally (although it doesn`t say "Don`t take this part literally"), while believing that some parts are meant to be taken literally, then you can not claim that your interpretation is the correct one for everyone.
0
Reply
Female 13
sure, i`ll stay silent... silent and deadly. just like the worst farts. lmao
0
Reply
Male 17,511
moefreak: Actually the term used was `Servant` aka `Worker`... The Jews used a different word for slavery, As in the story of Exodus.
0
Reply
Male 127
Moefreak speaks in tongues! The words of the devil! Ear muffs children.. haha but seriously dude, after reading all the posts below I couldn`t agree more with you.
0
Reply
Female 1,963
dax2009, that bible passage isn`t talking about working at McDonalds on minimum wage. It`s talking about being a slave. And it is encouraging people who are slaves to just put up with it, that they are better people for not fighting. Should that be the advice given to people who are currently slaves? And that certainly isn`t the only place in the bible where slavery is referenced in a very accepting way.
0
Reply
Male 422
Lol. I like how all the religious women are trying to protect this pooe...
0
Reply
Female 463
And this is why I can`t take much of the bible seriously...
0
Reply
Female 322
And it is not condoning slavery, it is meeting you where you are, and asking you to act Christlike, whatever your circumstances. Many is the time at work where I wanted to tell the supervisor to shove it, or just work slooowwww because of lousy supervision, but did not (or at least, only part of the time) because the Bible says to work as unto God, and God would reward you.
0
Reply
Female 322
moefreak, read the whole thing, in context. If you do good when good is being done to you, what is that to God? But if you do good, when someone is doing evil to you, then that is something. Jesus is the example here - they crucified Him, and He asked His Father to forgive them. Turn the other cheek. And ect.
0
Reply
Male 633
it helps to understand to whom Paul was speaking to and why he was saying what he was saying.
people have this idea that every excerpt from the bible is a rule for everyone to live by regardless of circumstance.
0
Reply
Male 2,893
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH........
Oh god, religion is so f*cking stupid and worthless............
0
Reply
Female 8,052
I find the canon/non canon argument doesn`t work anyway. Canonical gospels were largely chosen because they fit the party line ( apart from Thomas which is just silly). The bible is just a collection of texts, some relating to each other, some not. The Bible was not written by God ( if you believe in him) it was written by a human person. They may have thought, and you may believe, that it was divinely inspired - but that is not the same at all. All religions have many good points, the abrahamic ones also share a lot.Many religions share common points, so all religious people pick and choose what they believe. None of them have the right to say that their particular choice is the correct one.
0
Reply
Female 1,963
dax2000, so why is it that the same attitude can`t be attributed to homosexuality, for example? I mean, "Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh." 1 Peter 2:18
Sounds pretty much like condoning slavery to me.
0
Reply
Female 535
Lawl. Let`s ban female teachers next! Hey, if you can use your Bible to ban same-sex marriage, why ignore this?!
0
Reply
Male 582
*sigh*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! FIFTY THOUSAND TIMES AND IT NEVER GETS OLD! HAHAHAHAHA!

You know, the whole "SAMMICH" thing has sort of been driven into the ground. Its like the "eye bleach" comment that seems to never die.

0
Reply
Male 6,693
I thought I told you to go in that kitchen and make me something to eat. Why are you wearing shoes? I said Im hungry. And bring me a cold one. I dont have all day. This game will go off eventually.
0
Reply
Male 1,016
agreed now go make me a SAMMICH BIOTCH....but only after you done cleaning !!!
0
Reply
Female 322
moefreak - the bible never approves of slavery, it gives directions for how to treat slaves as humanely as possible, ect., because it was the reality of the times. Actually, there are more slaves in the world right now, than in any other time in history. The bible never sugar coats anything. When it was recording history, it recorded the bad and the good.
0
Reply
Male 2,669
The word of "Bob" is the only word you need -- AND THEN SOME!
0
Reply
Female 1,515
What I legitimately don`t understand is how people can say the bible is god`s word and then disregard parts of it as "stories/outdated" etc. If some parts of the bible aren`t "true", how can you believe the bible in it`s entirety is true?

Agreed with Moefreak that if you`re picking and choosing what to believe from the Bible you have no right to tell others what they can pick and choose from the Bible.
0
Reply
Female 1,963
CrakrJak, that is NOT what I`m saying at all. I`m not saying you either have to accept that all of it is literal or that none of it is literal. I thought I made that pretty clear, but I guess not.

I`m saying that if you accept (as most people do) that some of the bible is meant to be taken literally, while some of it is not, then YOU personally cannot be the person who is the ultimate authority for everyone else on which parts they should take literally.

For example, one might believe that the bible very clearly states that no man should ever have sex with another man, while believing that the parts where slavery is encouraged are "outdated", and thus no longer valid. While I`m completely OK with this person then not having sex with men himself, because he believes it is wrong, but it is NOT ok for him to say that it is wrong for everyone. Unless he is willing to accept that they may decide that keeping slaves should be the norm for everyone.
0
Reply
Male 582
I do not see a problem here. *shrug*
0
Reply
Female 322
And ALL the books of the bible, from Genesis to the Revelation carry the same weight as the gospels; ALL were inspired by the Holy Spirit and are for our edification.
0
Reply
Female 322
xavroche: As a Chirstian myself, I disagree with your downplaying the role of the Old Testament - it is just as much the Word of God as the New. Jesus did not destroy the law, but fullfilled it, as He did most of the prophecies, and will the rest (of the prophecies) at some point in the future. By reading the New Testament, you may have the understanding you need for salvation, but you will have a greater understanding of God by also reading the Old Testament. How do you think the books we have now, in the New Testament, were chosen and others not? Partly because they fit in with the revelation of God in the Old Testament: they did not contradict it. Paul heralded the Bereans for "searching the scripture to see if these things were true" (what he told them). What scripture do you believe he meant? The Holy Spirit inspired the O.T. as much as the New, and Christians who ignore that lose so much......
0
Reply
Male 1,882
"What religion boils down to is simply this:
My invisible friend can beat up your invisible friend. "

NUH UH, MY INVISIBLE FRIEND CAN BENCH PRESS 300 POUNDS!
0
Reply
Female 570
@raberboom
thats what i was thinking too. i think in a few hundred years we will have much more atheists
0
Reply
Male 833
Id make some snappy comeback about how i think religion is retarded, but just knowing that atheism is still steadily on the rise is good enough for me.
0
Reply
Male 467
Isn`t the whole idea of being surprised at how twisted the morals of some religions are, just the same as being surprised people in a mental hospital are acting weird? That`s sorta what you would expect.
0
Reply
Male 819
@Baalthazaq:
First on the Bible contradicting itself. I think most people think this because they don`t look at the Bible correctly. Not all books in the Bible are created equal. The Old Testament is really mainly there as a reference and to be built on. It is really important to understand that Christ is at the center of the Bible. Hence the core really is the Gospels and the life of Jesus. Acts is simply an account of the first Christians and the Epistles are guides on how to interpret the message of Jesus.

If you were to compare Christianity and Islam, The Old Testament for Christianity would be like the Suhuf Ibrahim/Tawrat/Zabur/Injil for Islam. No real equivalent for the Quoran exists in Christianity. The Quran was dictated word for word by Mohammed. The Gospels are basically four Biographies of Jesus. It makes sense that a single text told by a single source would be much more unified....
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Damnit, I made a mistake.

When I say "Picking and choosing is acceptable to an extent" that`s not actually what I mean.

It is wrong to just pick out the ones you like and disregard the ones you don`t. If you have reason to doubt the authenticity of a passage, *then* it may be acceptable to pick a better translation.

If you have two verses that contradict, you should have a *reason* to decide which of the two applies and which one does not.

Hadith is structured very specifically for this based on three tiers of sources, (Author, Conveyor, Speaker).

It isn`t just "which do I like the most", it is about consistency and context.

Even though I answer about 95% of "Look! Bad quote!" with "Read the next line" or "Read the previous line", context is a lot more than that.

Also, wherever possible, look stuff up in the original language.
0
Reply
Male 400
Yeah! And go make me a turkey pot pit too! hehe
My wife really hates that joke
0
Reply
Male 4,546
So yeah, long story short:

This isn`t a short story, it`s a long one. Which I urge you to read.

Overall though, I always tell people, regardless of which religion we`re discussing, to take the text as a whole.

You cannot dismiss Deborah being a leader and Prophetess in Judges while championing Timothy as saying they can`t. The whole must be considered.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
In other words (Moefreak), picking and choosing is acceptable to an extent. Usually however people have left that to religious bodies who declare what is canon and non canonical.

Sometimes this works well, sometimes, due to people being alive at certain times, this does not. Sometimes, stupid things make their way into "religious law" when they have nothing to do with religion.

Remember when we found out the earth went round the sun and all of religion collapsed? No? Because at the end of the day, it wasn`t core to anyone`s beliefs. Religion had no business taking sides in that argument.

They did it *not* because it was explicitly so (Psalm 96:10) any more than the same people thought that "Then all the trees of the forest will sing for joy" (two lines down in the same poem).

Reason and religion must go hand in hand, just like reason and lack of.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Actually, while I`m here, I might as well throw my hat into the ring.

I do actually think Christianity has it worse than Islam in that Biblical passages contradict. Islam has it too, but this is mainly confined to the Hadith rather than the Quran. Which we separate and order according to how accurate they are.

With the most accurate (Quran) being first, then Sahih Bukhari, then Sahih Muslim, and so on down the line till you start to reach stuff that is accepted as probably false, but kept for record-keeping purposes in case some of them turn out to shed some light on various matters. More info.

Christianity on the other hand doesn`t have the same level of ordering (though it does have Canon/Non Canon).
0
Reply
Male 230
What religion boils down to is simply this:
My invisible friend can beat up your invisible friend.

Case closed.
0
Reply
Male 21
Atleast we didn`t mention the incest
0
Reply
Male 819
I hate how smart all of you anti-Christians think you are when you pull poo like this out of your ass and then smugly stand back and think you`ve proven that Christianity is illogical/bad/evil. So you have spent five minutes on google, found a random quote from the Bible, and think you have uncovered some hidden treasure that you can throw in our face. Here`s a news flash. We read the Bible all the time, we know what is in it already. And trust me, thinking that you can understand an eight hundred thousand or so word book through a twentyish word quote is not very impressive from our end.
Obviously the Pauline Epistles (I might also add 1 Timothy is usually considered to be pseudepigraphic) are important, but anyone who actually knows the Bible will be able to put them into context, since they were meant to help spread the message of Jesus and give direction to the first Christian groups. Hence it is a little logical that some of the gender inequalities which existed
0
Reply
Male 819
two thousand years ago should be reflected in the text. In case you did not know true gender equality is less than a century old in some places and still does not exist in others.
Of course all of you are satisfied memorizing a few quotes that you have handpicked from either the Old Testament or like in the case from the sidelines of the New Testament. I have seen it time and time again, some douche thinking he is so smart for quoting Leviticus and showing how dumb the Bible is. If you had actually bothered to read the entire Bible and if you knew anything about Christianity maybe you would understand that we tend not to focus so much on the Old Testament, and that we do not worship the ground that Paul tread. What really interests us is the part about and surrounding Jesus Christ. Just in case you are extra retarded, which many of you tend to be, that is why we are called Christians. If you actually bothered to try to comprehend or learn about Jesus message maybe you would
0
Reply
Male 819
understand that he specifically says not to blindly follow texts (working on sabbath/not casting the first stone etc.) and that he is pretty liberal when it comes to the roles/rights of women.
Also I might add, being Christian is not about worshipping the Bible. It is about establishing a relationship with Christ, and therefore by definition with God. The Bible is simply a path to that relationship, but it is not the only one. How stupid would I look if I took a random single line from Dawkins, proved that it did not make sense(possibly by taking it completely out of context), and then stated that Atheism was retarded. Congratulations, you have done the same thing.
Also FYI, if I keep saying that you should read the Bible it is in no way to convert you. I am a fervent Christian but I have taken the time to read entire books from other religions and atheist manifestos. It is called educating yourself and maybe all you Christian bashers should give it a try.
0
Reply
Male 58
St Paul was an arse
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Bwahahaha @ pretty much all the people who give me poo every week for being Muslim, whether it`s relevant or not suddenly agreeing with all my arguments about context/language/taking it as a whole/etc.

Nice to see you agree with them all. If it wasn`t just when it suits you, it might actually have some value.

Now, it would be a pooty thing for me to do to dig up the people who AGREE this is sexist on the Christian side and abide by it, so I won`t.

But lets be clear here. You would. You have. And you never once ever stopped to consider any of the arguments you`d have retorted with if I had done it to you.
0
Reply
Female 322
Bacir - perfect example of taking something out of context. The bible says it happened - it does not say God approved of it happening.
0
Reply
Male 328
@clancy have you never heard that arguement before? its like basic bible debunking 101 for beginners
0
Reply
Male 17,511
moefreak: The all or nothing attitude you have is wrong. Most literature is written with a mix of literal and figurative speech. The Bible, Nor any other book, Is not meant to be interpreted 100% literally.

You could say, "He was green with envy" or "She really got my goat.". We know that neither statement is literal. Human language is full of figurative speech as is the Bible.

Your argument is just nonsensical.
0
Reply
Male 2,748
SO IT IS WRITTEN, SO SHALL IT BE DONE!!!
0
Reply
Male 95
ha "He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus." REV 22:20.... it sounds dirty.
0
Reply
Female 1,963
CrakrJak, I never said you were picking and choosing. All I`m saying is that if someone (like yourself) believes that not all of the bible is meant to be taken literally, then they have no grounds for claiming that particular parts are while others are not, at least in application to other people.

And thanks clancy and bacir, I`m feeling the love.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
moefreak: There are a lot of figurative things in the bible, You can`t take everything in the Bible literally. Also a lot of the Old Testament are stories of Jewish history that needs to be read in that context, Not modern day context.

It`s not `picking and choosing`, It`s called being reasonable and judicious.
0
Reply
Male 83
@ Moegirl

You have made the most sensible statement about interpreting the Bible I have ever heard. I`m sorry, but I will be using that argument against other ignorant people.
0
Reply
Male 13
@Moefreak
Marry me.
0
Reply
Female 1,963
Either you accept that all of the bible is meant to be taken pretty much literally, or you accept that some of the bible is metaphorical, outdated, mistranslated etc. If you are of the latter view, you CANNOT be the one who decides which parts everyone else should take literally. You can only interpret the book for yourself. Any claims of "Well God didn`t really mean that whole no shellfish thing, but he was totally serious about dudes not having sex with other dudes" are just speculation.
0
Reply
Male 13
"Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve the seed of our father."
Genesis 19:31 (KJV)

So THATS why the Bible is so popular in the south!
0
Reply
Female 322
Gal 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

Just one of the many reasons I became a Christian. The Bible (Old and New Testaments together) need to be taken in context, in it`s entirety to get the whole picture.
0
Reply
Male 2,419
The Bible
Treat it like an all you can eat buffet. Take as much of what you want, and ignore anything you don`t.
0
Reply
Male 3,915
Phelps just kind of skips over that one...
0
Reply
Male 105
RIP advice dog...
0
Reply
Female 2,927
yeah right, good luck with that.
0
Reply
Female 246
"wow... kinda makes me wish i was a man"

silly book, stop giving children weird ideas,
worse than television
0
Reply
Male 5,189
Oh wow. o.o
0
Reply
Male 5,194
They got a Bible macro now? Dang. I can`t keep up. I liked the funny "Bachelor Frog" ones, those were pretty good.
0
Reply
Female 426
Back to the kitchen for me, I guess.
0
Reply
Male 170
*Bible`s up for picking and choosing, you take what you want and discard the rest! *

I think the point is that it`s not supposed to be for picking and choosing, you`re supposed to take on the whole lot, kit and caboodle. As this is part of it, some people may not wish to adopt it. If they don`t wish to adopt it, then they`re picking and choosing, which isn`t really how I thought you were supposed to go about religion.
0
Reply
Female 9,572
"Bible`s up for picking and choosing, you take what you want and discard the rest!"

I know right.
0
Reply
Female 4,084
more sexist christian crap. what few bring up is the fact that the bible has been translated into dozens of languages by thousands of ignorant repressed men over the last 2000 years. give me a text written in an ancient lost language and i`ll give you my personal slant on whatever i think is being said. and who`s to say i`m wrong when i can claim divine inspiration?
0
Reply
Male 17,511
almightybob1: Jesus said that to a rich young man and the young man `went away sorrowful`. Jesus then said, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."

He basically said, `Don`t worship money, Worship God`. Many rich people are obsessed with wealth and that separates them from serving God.
0
Reply
Female 3,598
this passage is one of the many reasons i abandoned christianity right after highschool...
0
Reply
Male 113
" And Jesus was drating hungry. So the Kitchen was made."
-6:30 Dinner
0
Reply
Male 4,290
[quote]They must be understood in light of the specific circumstances of the era he wrote them in.[/quote]

Why are only Paul`s letters excluded from being eternal moral teachings? I could equally say that maybe Jesus only meant for the people of the time to follow his teachings.

In fact, from the number of Christians who ignore Matthew 19:21, it would seem they agree with that.
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Bible`s up for picking and choosing, you take what you want and discard the rest!
0
Reply
Male 17,511
Paul`s letters should not necessarily be used as timeless marching orders for the church, They must be understood in light of the specific circumstances of the era he wrote them in.
0
Reply
Male 772
DIETY, I find it ironic that you say that when a dyslexic person might read your name as deity ;)
0
Reply
Male 60
I`m diggin this sermon.
0
Reply
Male 196
Shaving is a sin as well. The bible is a big crock of poo, and anyone who is religious is a drating idiot.
0
Reply
Male 1,834
very wise
0
Reply
Male 2,688
Look to the movie Dogma for the explanation as to WHY women are portrayed so badly in the bible... Simple as that...
0
Reply
Male 1,378
worst colorwheel ever
0
Reply
Male 310
Jeez God`s a dick.
0
Reply
Male 1,222
Im gonna use this today at church
0
Reply
Male 1,598
Oh, and a sandwich would be nice too.
- 1 Timothy 2:13
0
Reply
Male 59
this is why im pro religion
0
Reply
Male 39,914
the Bible`s full of that kind of thing. That`s why it amazes me when women support christianity... or any religion as I don`t know of one that likes women.

still, it`s good advice,right?
0
Reply
Male 40,752
YEah, the writings of Paul leave much to be desired...
0
Reply
Male 7,830
i think thats why this religion has lasted so long
0
Reply
Female 798
@Djarum
they probably said something along the lines of Jesus fulfilled the Old Testament and that`s why we don`t have to sacrifice goats and such anymore. Unless Jesus reiterated in the New Testament (like he did with the 10 commandments) don`t worry about it.

Whether you want to except that is up to you though.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
*Long inhale* Still too easy...

"Holy crap, the bible is real?"
Even easier.
0
Reply
Male 2,440
Jesus Died lol

xD
0
Reply
Female 2,352
As with anything else in the bible, what a load of sh*t.
0
Reply
Male 4,014
Man, I Googled that phrase, and its the main justification by which the Catholic Church prohibits women from being clergy...
0
Reply
Male 774
0
Reply
Male 307
Old Testament also says you can get away with rape, and all sorts of poo if you have the money or such. When I`ve asked Christian friends about this they just say something like, "God got rid of the OT after the New Testament," and some such confusing prepared speeches.
0
Reply
Female 579
"..."
0
Reply
Male 4,680
@TheBLB- Explain how this is out of context then.
0
Reply
Male 812
It is written in the bible, therefore it`s true!
0
Reply
Male 491
Why to go Timmy!
0
Reply
Male 3,076
good old bible never disappoints
0
Reply
Male 24
lkc1, Timothy is the New Testament - not the ancient Jewish dogmas, but the Christian church teachings on how people should behave morally.
0
Reply
Female 224
the old testament says a LOT of things about women...
0
Reply
Male 2,441
Words to live by?
0
Reply
Male 1,196
this proves that the bible is true
0
Reply
Female 1,148
Tell that to all the Westboro Baptist Church women!
0
Reply
Male 1,764
Well, now I know what Bible quote I`ll be using with woman evangelists.
0
Reply
Male 4,807
Proverbs 21(19)
Better to live in a desert than with a quarrelsome and ill-tempered wife.
0
Reply
Female 2,120
Hahahaha!
0
Reply
Male 1,523
Holy crap, the bible is real?
0
Reply
Male 3,745
im gonna look this up...
0
Reply
Male 127
Ahh yes, I think I saw that book in stores on the shelf next to Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings.. epic yet fictional. Flame Wars... IT HAS BEGUN!!!
0
Reply
Male 237
Fancylad: more out-of-context trolling than Seth McFarlane
0
Reply
Male 20,911
Link: Your Sunday Bible Message [Pic] [Rate Link] - Fairly ballsy for the Good Book, no?
0
Reply