NYers Still Opposed To Ground Zero Mosque [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 7 years ago in

Wait a minute, no one said logic would be introduced into this argument!
There are 139 comments:
Male 1
http://protecttherepublic.lefora.com/2010/06/10/ground-zero-mosque/#post4

Guys, please read what I had to say on the issue that I wrote on another forum.
0
Reply
Female 320
Pancake, try googling the aztecs. Murdered by catholicism.
0
Reply
Male 3,755
Good question, Pancake. They didn`t. They might have killed Natives, but not in the name of religion. This cartoon, though mildly clever, relies on false premises.

I don`t think people should be offended at all by building a mosque near Ground-Zero. It would show the world that were the bigger people and almost be a slap in the face to terrorists and other people who don`t like us.
0
Reply
Male 17
Christians murdered American Indians in the name of Jesus?

When?
0
Reply
Female 209
BALLTHAZAQ- this is a place for not smart stuff, its IAB, so stop it
0
Reply
Male 12
im sorry i dont give a damn about religion but those terrorist bastards have no right!!
0
Reply
Male 583
hehe internet
0
Reply
Male 4,546
When I say you have not addressed my points, allow me to be clear. This is now going to fall off tail of threads I continue to follow.

Anyone wishing to read our interaction can do so. Feel free to make closing arguments, I believe all my points have been made and anything you have to say further will be answered just as well by any of my previous comments.

Also, the reason Rex does not "drat" me is because where we come from, we can love people without drating them. I`d say "like say a mother or brother", but given your general demeanor I`m guessing your opinion on that similarly might come from the same Banjo school you get the rest of your information from.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Auburn,

I absolutely, 100% support the attempt to break the blockade punishing civilians without merit, and giving terrorists an even easier target for Israel.

The US government`s generals agree with me, the economist agrees with me, Stratfor agrees with me, the FT agrees with me.

The idea that trying to deliver aid to a besieged people is "hating democracy" is utterly absurd, and this does not make all of those publications and experts "democracy haters". It is equally absurd to call Rauf part of "violent clashes".

You criticize my use of ABC then go and get "The Voice of the Orthodox Jewish Community" as a source on his position on aid to Palestine?

Perhaps I misunderstood, did you want LESS reliable sources than ABC? Was that your complaint?

You have not addressed my points.
I have so far addressed all of yours.
0
Reply
Male 2,159
As well as Christians killing natives etc., didn`t God "`himself`" kill lots of people in the bible?

@lordtyusa, you mentioned Hitler (sort of). It`s inevitable that someone does that in an web argument, but I found that funny.
0
Reply
Male 134
jesus died lol
0
Reply
Male 2,148
lordtyusa: First of all, terrorist acts are committed by people, not religions. There are Muslims that hate Western culture, but Islam as a whole does not teach that the West is bad and needs to be destroyed. Get it straight.

Second, how exactly is an atrocity committed by Christians different than one committed by Muslims? It`s completely relevant that Christians killed people here and then built churches. Your own people did it, and now you oppose it happening with other people.

For the record, I oppose the mosque, too. I think you`re correct that it`s tacky and disrespectful. I just wanted you to know people are tired of Christians acting all high and mighty like different rules apply to them.
0
Reply
Male 230
If they build this they do realize it will be bombed or a shooting will take place dont they?
0
Reply
Male 301
Ow ow ow!!! The amount of logical fallacies here HURTS! It`s not about Christianity. It`s about Islam. Any terrorist acts committed by Christianity are irrelevant to the topic. This is about Muslim extremists killing thousands of innocent people, not to spread their faith, but to kill the infidel (which is all of you on here btw...unless you yourself are Muslim). And so now I`m to be chastized and made to feel guilty because I don`t feel the need to advocate senseless violence all for the sake of being politically correct and tolerant?! Give me a break. It`s tacky and disrespectful to try and justify the murder of these people, which is what you are doing when you defend the building of a structure that represents the cause of these specific horrible acts. While we are at it, lets build a pro-American museum in the heart of Hiroshima, or a Hitler statue over where a concentration camp once was! We`ll just label anyone who disagrees with said structure as intolerant.
0
Reply
Male 116
wondering**
0
Reply
Male 116
This isn`t directed at Banksy`s new I <3 NY piece is it? Just wonderding...
0
Reply
Male 10,338
"Promoting tolerance and understanding"

Try promoting it to Muslim Extremists.
0
Reply
Male 275
amen to that util
0
Reply
Male 136
Promoting tolerance and understanding on the web is like trying to swim in an ocean of peanut butter trolls.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
@khalfani:

23 Muslims died in the WTC attack. 1/3 of 1%.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
@sumrandom:

Unless they use the mosque to hide the attack. They could build up tons of explosives in there, or perhaps a dirty bomb, and detonate it without warning.
0
Reply
Male 182
I get it the artist made the Americans fat to expand on a stereotype.

what I do not get is why are the Indians not drunk?
0
Reply
Male 794
i was having the same conversation in my chiropractic office
why so against it, and why blame everybody for selective actions of few, plus forgiveness and understanding is the only thing that can end all wars, and as we all know that will never happen, as a new yorker, i say let them build a mosque to show that even tho they can hate us, we dont have to hate them, plus i have not heard of any mosques being blown up lately, so maybe this will prevent future attacks, right?
0
Reply
Male 81
why does it have to be Jesus vs. Islam? This idiot artist is just on the opposite end of the spectrum from the characters in the first 2 panels
0
Reply
Male 92
So Im guessing they assume that Muslims weren`t in the Towers too eh?
0
Reply
Female 4,039
I agree with McGovern - it`s just so instigating. A good compromise would be a 7-Eleven.
0
Reply
Male 432
madest
Male, 40-49, Eastern US
2066 Posts Wednesday, June 09, 2010 8:23:33 AM
AJ, You keep saying: "American Indians didn`t believe in land ownership".
Clearly you don`t know what you`re talking about. The fact is Indians had no concept of land ownership. The had no literal translation in any of their dialects. Not understanding and not "believing" are two entirely different things.
-----------------------------
^^This.

Considering they fought, collectively, for hundreds of years to keep their land, and that their race almost went extinct in the process, I`m pretty damn sure they wanted to keep it.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
So they didn`t understand.

Should have I guess.
0
Reply
Male 14,331
Why do they want to open it up on 9-11-11 then that`s just picking a fight.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
AJ, You keep saying: "American Indians didn`t believe in land ownership".
Clearly you don`t know what you`re talking about. The fact is Indians had no concept of land ownership. The had no literal translation in any of their dialects. Not understanding and not "believing" are two entirely different things.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
@rexbanner:

So why don`t you drat him then?
0
Reply
Male 18
@Baalthazaq


1: It is two blocks away.
2: It is already used for prayers, they`re just expanding it and turning it into a proper Mosque.

Meh, this debate is pretty much over.

`I love you so much right now :)`
0
Reply
Male 500
Don`t build churches or mosques, ultimately eveyone wins.
0
Reply
Male 6,693
Now thats just funny. The never ending cycle.
0
Reply
Male 92
It is in bad taste, and that is it. Especially when you take into consideration that it will be called Cordoba House, which was one of the main Islamic cities/capitals in Spain when they took it from the Spaniards.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
I`m talking about others in the discussion samidoll.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
this http://tinyurl.com/2bbdyka

I said I didn`t really have a problem with a mosque there, but now I do. Read that.

Also, people are comparing this to American Indians (not native Americans as you put it. There are no native Americans, as a human has never evolved on this continent. No one that has ever been here has been "native"). The Settlers never "conquered" this land. The first European Americans settled here. They didn`t take a thing from anyone. American Indians didn`t believe in land ownership. How could the settlers take something that wasn`t owned?
0
Reply
Female 614
stupid. they are not comparing native americans to muslims. they are comparing them to americans who are opposed to muslims. if anything, they are comparing the muslims with the christians. somebody didn`t do well on reading comprehension on their SATs i bet.
0
Reply
Male 395
Ad hominem tu quoque.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Come to me with something other than ABC sir.

That`s almost like using MSNBC, or me using FOX lol.

It`s already been proven that NYC has more than enough Mosques, so I am not going to repeat what has already been said. It`s up to you to read all the responses, or pay attention the first time.

I know people are stupid. While I personally don`t have a problem with the mosque going up per se, I do know that going up that close to the WTC site, and going up on that date, will attract people of a horrible sort. That`s why I say it`s hate baiting. Regardless of how they explain that 9-11 is a good day to open the mosque, it`s still the wrong day. That would be like a white man marching through a ghetto saying "Good riddance!" over and over on MLK day.
I was trying to find an exact number of Muslims in NYC. I found out there are 38 mosques in NYC, with 20 of them being on the Manhattan isle itself. I also found
Male 4,546
Auburn:
"Comparing Muslims to Native Americans"
Wrong way round.

"this close to ground zero"
2 blocks away is fine.

"They seem to be doing this to attract hatred"
Or, if you didn`t immediately assume the worst because of your prejudices, quite clearly, the opposite. (Link includes statements from the board that approved it, and the organizers.

"There`s already a Mosque on Manhattan. It is sufficient. There`s no reason for another."
The building was bought, originally, to accommodate OVERFLOW WORSHIPPERS from the previous Mosque. That is the opposite of the definition of sufficient.

Guardingnome:
"As long as we can open a Star-Bucks inside of the Hagia Sophia."
There is a Starbucks < 300ft from Hagia Sophia. 1 Block away.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Comparing Muslims to American Indians is apples to oranges.

Comparing the crusades and the Spanish inquisition to Muslims is apples to oranges.

Agree or not, putting a mosque this close to ground zero and opening it on 9-11 is asking for religious intolerance, period. It`s hate baiting.

They seem to be doing this to attract hatred, to garner sympathy for their own cause.

There`s already a Mosque on Manhattan. It is sufficient. There`s no reason for another.
0
Reply
Male 240
We are the great human experiment. I just hope common sense and logic will, one day, prevail. Pointless optimism, I`m sure.
0
Reply
Male 2,893
As long as we can open a Star-Bucks inside of the Hagia Sophia.
0
Reply
Male 619
TGPZarquon

I know that this is probably not the correct forum for saying so, but you have one of the greatest screen names around. Frankly, though, seeing that you have returned makes me wonder just how much time we have left.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
So, again, RELIGIONS ARE RETARDED! And usually, i find that religious people are ignorant. (not ALL of them of course, but of the lot that i`ve met, a lot of them are very ignorant.) Which is why I did the intelligent thing and created my own belief system, just for myself.
0
Reply
Male 467
@mattriesel
The only religion of extremists is hate. Be it Muslim-, Christian-, sports- or anything else extremists.

TGPZarquon does present a very valid point, that enough time hasn`t passed.
On the other hand, Americans have to learn to distinguish between extremists and everyone else, no matter the religion.
Building a mosque on ground zero might be a tool in starting a very necessary discussion.
0
Reply
Male 302
9/11: Seriously guys, it`s a war, that`s how this stuff works. The American army goes storming across some country bombing cities, killing people at weddings and generally pissing on the collective bonfire. In retaliation your enemies attack you, except they just destroyed a few buildings. And whilst this is sad, I think it surprised a lot of people when they found they weren`t `untouchable`.

0
Reply
Male 1,265
Soooo... is it right or is it wrong? Cuz if it`s wrong then they shouldn`t build the Mosque, right? If it`s right then it`s okay to build churches near sites of native americans?
0
Reply
Male 575
Islam didn`t destroy the TT; that was terrorism. Learn the difference, come back, apologize.
0
Reply
Male 166
While I have no issue whatsoever with peaceful Muslims, the issue is that the attacks were carried out by fanatic Muslims, (no conspiracy theories, please) so the families of those who died there just might not want a symbol of what their loved ones were murdered for nearby.

There is also the question of immediacy. Ten years haven`t even passed. You cannot compare the emotional reactions of people whose lives were affected or ruined by the attacks to those who are descendants of events that happened 150-400 years ago. Every country throughout history has conquered or subdued another race or nation at some point. Does blame go back and forth throughout the world ranging all the way back to biblical times, or is it just in America (whose sins of Native American conquest and slavery were begun by our European colonist forefathers) that history can never be forgiven?
0
Reply
Male 134
If extremists successfully defeat Americans as the Europeans did the Indians, then they can build their mosques near our sacred "sites"
0
Reply
Male 125
@brutalnewt: It`s also the right of any American to go tell a perfect stranger, to "go f*** themselves". But, that isn`t very respectful is it?
0
Reply
Male 111
I was always told that one of the founding principles of America was religious freedom. As long as they`re not doing anything illegal, they can build a mosque wherever they want and open it whenever they want; that`s the right of any American.
0
Reply
Male 125
Wow, this cartoon justifies doing wrong things forever by using gross misinformation of past wrongs. Because we all know it was priests, nuns and missionaries that took land from native Americans and killed them. There wasn`t a single corrupt government official who had anything to do with that! Why, hell, they should just build the damn mosque ON the old Twin Towers site shouldn`t they? That show those bastards right wouldn`t it? Because, you know, Christians did bad things to native Americans over a hundred years ago. I guess that`s why Israel deserves to be wiped off the map also, huh? Because they attacked the natives in the promised land over 3,000 years ago! Because we ALL know two wrongs make a right. Thanks for this incredibly insightful cartoon on why doing bad things is justified by past wrong doings(This comment was brought to you by the letter `S` for Sarcasm).
0
Reply
Female 654
hmm...i can see both sides here. it does seem kinda of disrespectful, even thought those people who will be using this building had nothing to with it...but it was already there? is that whats being said? i dont see why they cant expand. new york has a super diverse culture of its own, and there are plenty of muslims there, so they should have a place to go.

ifit wasnt already there though, i dont see why they cant compromise something. mosque arent really unattractive buildings either, they are kept rather clean, whcih would be crazy for new york. i dont really remember a clean building last time i went there..there were scaffolds everywhere. the city looked dumpy
0
Reply
Male 1,610
Well, they can`t build ON ground zero, and this is as close as anyone can get. The property was purchased on September, 2009 and "city officials say the current building, constructed between 1857 and 1858 in the Italian Renaissance palazzo style, is historically and architecturally significant" and may not be authorized to be torn down. The building will be demolished and a new 13 story mega-mosque/cultural center erected in its` place.

It overlooks the destruction site from 9/11 and is named after the Great Cordoba Mosque which represent the peak of Islamic dominance in Spain. This is just packed with tastefulness!
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Gerry1of1:

"Like it or not, terrorism works. They got the Gazza strip didn`t they?"

Yes it does work, it got Israel all of Israel. See Lehi, Irgun, and Haganah all joined in armed struggle against the British rule of 92% Arab land while the British were trying to find a solution between the Arabs and Jews.

They used car bombs, roadside bombs, and hidden bombs. Sound familiar?

Furthermore, by Israel`s own criteria, the Palestinians do not control the Gaza strip. By Israel`s own admission several of them are considered terrorist groups. That didn`t stop the government handing out awards memorials and recognition to them in the 80s.

drat, you don`t have to be Einstein to see that. (Though he totally did.)
0
Reply
Female 1,190
@panda bear
*facepalm*
0
Reply
Male 570
yeah... i`m pretty sure 100 times more muslims have been killed by terrorists than american. if the site is designed to be against terrorism then why can`t they have their mosque there?
0
Reply
Male 39,913
Like it or not, terrorism works. They got the Gazza strip didn`t they?
0
Reply
Male 22
It`s just going to be a little thing nearby the site... People complain about it like they`re putting it there to insult the people who died there.. What about all the innocent Muslim people who died during the 9/11 attacks?

And yeah, there were drating plenty of them, just because most of them were Christian doesn`t mean a mosque shouldn`t be allowed to be built.

I`m personally against ANY religious poo being built pretty much anywhere, but this is a bit drated up, if someone said a Christian/Catholic church was being built NEARBY not a soul would complain. But because its a religion that`s getting drated over by extremists its horrible and should not be built...

Funniest thing is, people are extremely quick to forget all the drated up poo that Christianity did throughout history... All their poo should mean no churches should be built anywhere by their logic..
0
Reply
Male 4,546
FFS. Actually reading more on this:

1: It is two blocks away.
2: It is already used for prayers, they`re just expanding it and turning it into a proper Mosque.

Meh, this debate is pretty much over.
0
Reply
Male 2,422
continued: in a socially constructive manner. That kind of place should be built on emotionally neutral ground where rational interaction and debate can take place divested of intense emotional reactions that cloud understanding and cooperation. Just my two cents. I don`t even live there.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Oh! I thought the Mosque was being built on ground zero, as in some Muslim prayer room or something was going to be in the new tower somewhere.

It`s just being built near the site? I don`t get the problem at all then. Are there not Muslims in the area who would be using it?
0
Reply
Female 150
"Oh. And the fact that they choose to open it on 9/11 just seems pretty insulting to me as well. Out of all the 365 days of the year, why did they pick that one?"

well it is ground zero so that might have something to do with it... not saying that i agree with it or anything, but that kinda seems like a duh...
0
Reply
Male 2,422
I think a mosque close to ground zero is a really bad idea. In fact, I think any religious memorial close to ground zero is a bad idea. It should be a national secular monument that all americans can participate emotionally in, any religious memorial close to ground zero will probably create a divisive community. I`m not opposed to the idea of building a
site that "would help `bridge the great divide` between Muslims and the rest of America" as the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf said. But Ground Zero has got to be the worst place for such a site. Ground Zero is defined by the actions of a radical subset of an entire culture and too infused with emotional resonance to engage critically with the merits (and demerits) of the culture that produced the ones who commited the crime in a fair and balanced manner. If it is built at Ground Zero it will always be tainted by the events that happend there and will be counter-productive for any attempt by muslims and non-muslims to interact i
0
Reply
Male 4,546
I LOVE that the main argument coming from Americans when it comes to Israel and Native Americans seems to be "We had a fight and WON! Therefore we get it all!"

So you`re suggesting Arabs just need to up the violence? That`s the problem? Not enough violence?

Genuinely that`s the argument you`re making? Or is it that you just haven`t realized that`s your argument?
0
Reply
Male 2,436
Religion is dumb.
0
Reply
Male 2,307
It would be like you woke up one day and nearly everyone in your town was dead. The population density would go from 350 to 15 million. So imagine 98% of your population decimated.

0
Reply
Male 1,351
"Iunno about the rest of you, but building a mosque there would be a sign of tolerance and forgiveness, just like the bible teach-
*sigh*
Forget I said anything."

That`s right, you almost forgot the crowd you`re talking to. Don`t try to teach us IAB`ers about tolerance of other religions, we won`t stand for it (puts on big grin and stands there).
0
Reply
Male 2,307
"So the pioneers hundred of years ago were EXACTLY the same as muslim extremists, right? Is that what im missing? Okay, NOW this comic has a valid point."

They were better. They took 110 million to 2 million. That would be like 9/11 by a factor of 55,000.
0
Reply
Male 2,307
"I`m tired of hearing about Native Americans every time someone mentions foreign influence in the U.S. There was a battle for this land and the Christians won. Get over it. It doesn`t matter how they won, if they cheated, or anything else. The Native American (which is a racist term by the way) argument is an irrelevant one. "

Just in! History is now irrelevant.
0
Reply
Male 88
sooo true
0
Reply
Male 378
I`m tired of hearing about Native Americans every time someone mentions foreign influence in the U.S. There was a battle for this land and the Christians won. Get over it. It doesn`t matter how they won, if they cheated, or anything else. The Native American (which is a racist term by the way) argument is an irrelevant one.
0
Reply
Male 63
So the pioneers hundred of years ago were EXACTLY the same as muslim extremists, right? Is that what im missing? Okay, NOW this comic has a valid point.
0
Reply
Male 877
Brassbull
Male, 30-39, Southern US
516 Posts Tuesday, June 8, 2010 3:32:01 PM
By demonstrating that fundamentalists do not have a monopoly in Islam.


You`re assuming that is how they would interpret a mosque being built there. News flash: Radical Islam does not Buy into American Liberal Agenda/Paradigm


does anyone actually use this word `paradigm`?...or is it only the pretentious among us...?...i got it when you said `agenda`
0
Reply
Female 1,101
Agreed. Agreed. People love to say that this country was founded on Christianity and not any other religion. But what does it matter if this country was founded on Christianity, if none of us were alive back then to have a vote in it?! We`re alive and here now and we get a gosh darned vote! :-)

Although I still dislike the idea of a Mosque being built on ground zero, go figure.
0
Reply
Male 5,314
oh mosque. for some reason i kept reading memorial. i dont know how, but i just did, ok?
0
Reply
Male 1,625
@Notthatbored: haha ;) No it really isn`t but tangents are fun arent they?
It just the ol` "America wasnt founded on islam! rabble, rabble, rabble" arguement. The point is we have to look backwards before we can judge. How many native americans were killed, relocated, exploited, etc for gain? To them, the invading whites were comparable to "terrorists". So to throw around the word so freely with complete disregard for our own sordid past is a gross mistake.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
@Elmustache When were you born? Maybe I was here first! You ever think of that?! J/K

Seriously though I don`t think it matters who`s ancestors where here first. I didn`t ask to be born here.

0
Reply
Female 1,682
I still don`t want a mosque there. And the reason I don`t doesn`t even have to do with religion in any way. Its pretty much what elk said. I also think it deserves something better. Like a memorial. But not a mosque (nor any other kind of place of worship)

Oh. And the fact that they choose to open it on 9/11 just seems pretty insulting to me as well. Out of all the 365 days of the year, why did they pick that one?
0
Reply
Male 1,610
Aseirinn:..and I got it when you said Brassbull. No need to take up that much space spelling out my sex, age, region, # of posts, etc. Just a name or the quote works fine here.

I wasn`t sure which word would have worked better; they`re not synonyms, so I went with both. Are you more annoyed by that or because I corrected you on your spelling and history? There is no f*cking way you are 70 years old or more.
0
Reply
Male 5,314
i didn`t get it at all
0
Reply
Female 798
so elkingo...how you doin ;-)
0
Reply
Male 196
Yay, moral relativism is fun!
0
Reply
Male 1,625
Thank you! The fact that this country was essentially founded on "Divine providence" is insane. The rape and murder of other nations is inexcusable, so before you tell me and my people to go back where we came from, news flash. We were here first.
0
Reply
Female 1,101
I agree, why do they have to build something religious there? Something that was useful for everyone would be nice ...
0
Reply
Male 4,431
WHAT?! So, what it`s drating okay to build a church there, but not a mosque?! As if those few terrorists represent all of Islam? This country is about freedom of religion. It`s a central tenant. You censor that, may as well just censor everything. As such, I say no churches of ANY kind near ground zero. How`s that? Oh, no? We can have churches of all kinds, just no mosques? Idiots. :-(
0
Reply
Male 1,623
Instead of building churches, mosques and synagogues, why not build community centres?
0
Reply
Male 12,365
A mosque there would be a magnet for extremism. If you were a Muslim who hates the USA and wants to destroy it and make a fundamentalist Islamic theocracy, where better to worship than in the place of your greatest triumph over your enemies?

If they do build a religious building there, it should be combined synagogue, church and mosque. *That* would be a religious symbol of peace. Or even go a stage further and have a general religion building.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
How about this though on the Mosque debate:

As an American, I don`t want to honor the terrorists and dishonor the people who died and suffered by supporting something from their culture. I say no to the Mosque based on that principal, has nothing to do with religion really.

Build a memorial there. A non-religious building, that states thus: Our fellow Americans died at the hands of terrorists here; we shall not forget.

By doing this you say to all religions, we will never again tolerate bigotry and hate.
0
Reply
Male 5,620
addler, "ahahahaha stupid native americans.... or whatever they like to be called these days

one day they will learn, if you`re weak you tend not to be able to hold on to land for too long"

As a Cherokee, we trusted the whites, gave them food, taught them how to survive in America, and stood our ground for over 400 years, while the whites had superior technology, and still struggled to live in our land. What did we get in return? Disrespect, lies, and treachery. We got our women raped, our land raped, and our culture raped.

By far, my people are not weak, not have they ever been weak. It is people like you are are weak, both in spirit and mind. I wager you are also physically fragile, and just don`t know it yet.

Learn to read and write for starters, then maybe you can make an opinion everyone doesn`t think is ignorant.
0
Reply
Male 877
Brassbull
Male, 30-39, Southern US
516 Posts Tuesday, June 8, 2010 3:32:01 PM
By demonstrating that fundamentalists do not have a monopoly in Islam.


You`re assuming that is how they would interpret a mosque being built there. News flash: Radical Islam does not Buy into American Liberal Agenda/Paradigm


does anyone actually use this word `paradigm`?...or is it only the pretentious among us...?...i got it when you said `agenda`
0
Reply
Male 5,194
Fine with me - no churches near Wounded Knee or places like that, either. Sounds like a good idea.
0
Reply
Female 3,574
er k. I agree?
0
Reply
Male 987
Iunno about the rest of you, but building a mosque there would be a sign of tolerance and forgiveness, just like the bible teach-
*sigh*
Forget I said anything.
0
Reply
Male 2,703
"AND it took whites *400* years to "conquer" America (1492-1900)."

the originally weren`t trying to "conquer" america, they were trading technology and other things until the kings got greedy and wanted the stuff ON/IN the land. when the english wanted the land they `conquered` it in <250 years (1605-1850).

if you really want to get technical, it took the `whites` MUCH MUCH longer to discover and then conquer america. the Vikings were settled in Greenland and Eastern Canada since the 11th century; so more like 800-900 years
0
Reply
Female 250
I don`t get it lololol
0
Reply
Male 1,610
[quote]By demonstrating that fundamentalists do not have a monopoly in Islam.[/quote]

You`re assuming that is how they would interpret a mosque being built there. News flash: Radical Islam does not Buy into American Liberal Agenda/Paradigm

[quote]we could recognize that the terrorists of any faith do not represent anyone other than themselves.[/quote]

Well until you get everyone to that consensus maybe it would be more diplomatic to build a mosque in a another location that is more acceptable to people who lost friends and family there.
0
Reply
Male 1,610
[quote]imagine the humiliation they suffer everyday in iraq and afganistan[/quote]

The humiliation that who suffers? Terrorists? They`re not humiliated. In some cases they are aided by friends, relatives, and supporters, and in other cases they scare the natives into submission.

[quote]remember, the afgans have now been invaded twice[/quote]

The Afghans were invaded four times, first by Alexander the Great, then the British, then the russians, then us. What is your point here?

[quote]there are american muslims also, as in its theyre country too.[/quote]

Woah, I never said they didn`t have a right to build a mosque there, I said it is inappropriate to do so and, to me, shows what little concern they have for other people when praising their god. I`ve heard several explanations for why they are choosing this particular site, and none of them make any sense.
0
Reply
Male 496
Good point aseirinn. Do you think it`d be appropriate to put up a church close to a site associated with Muslim humiliation in Iraq or Afghanistan to promote understanding between our people? Let`s go put up a giant cathedral across the street from Abu Ghraib. What do you think Iraqis would think of that?
0
Reply
Male 678
WTC bombing was like soooooo yesterday. Get over it like pearl harbor America. They have great sushi in Hawaii!
0
Reply
Male 1,054
"I wish someone could explain how building a mosque by the buildings they destroyed would be bad for Islamic terrorists. "

By demonstrating that fundamentalists do not have a monopoly in Islam.

There are Christian terrorists right here in the U.S.A., from the Klan to the folks who blow up abortion clinics and murder medical staff who perform abortions.

We could bar Christian churches from "inappropriate" neighborhoods, or

we could recognize that the terrorists of any faith do not represent anyone other than themselves.
0
Reply
Male 2,703
"colonial americans were effing pricks"

hey, don`t blame this on the americans. the majority of the people who defamed indian (native american) land were europeans who called themselves american. even Thomas Jefferson (who bought the louisiana purchase and sent lewis and clark to california) was born in virginia but it was still english colonies...
0
Reply
Male 25,416
no comment!
0
Reply
Female 3,828
SO true
0
Reply
Male 246
I think it would be better to go with the Spanish Inquisition or the Crusades as a display of Christian brutality - therefore no churches virtually anywhere.
0
Reply
Male 1,354
Yah um, whites had superior tech (guns), biological warfare (smallpox), unlimited supply of invaders from Europe, and betrayed every treaty. AND it took whites *400* years to "conquer" America (1492-1900). You, weak troll, need to open a history book.

"ahahahaha stupid native americans.... or whatever they like to be called these days one day they will learn, if you`re weak you tend not to be able to hold on to land for too long"
0
Reply
Male 351
I didn`t have a problem with it until they were going to open it on 9-11. Obvious trolling is obvious.
0
Reply
Male 877
Brassbull
Male, 30-39, Southern US
512 Posts Tuesday, June 8, 2010 2:42:43 PM
I`m not christian and I think it`s a bad idea. The terrorists were screaming allah akbar just before the planes hit, and now those words will be constantly repeated at the site. It doesn`t take a rocket scientist to see how that would be distasteful to some people, regardless of their religious affiliations.



imagine the humiliation they suffer everyday in iraq and afganistan...remember, the afgans have now been invaded twice...there are american muslims also, as in its theyre country too...by not allowing it arent you telling muslims, all muslims that they can never be accepted as true blue americans?..as was done to blacks and mexicans in the past and some would argue sitll goes on?
0
Reply
Male 1,610
Here is a clip of the wife of the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, Daisy Khan talking with Fox News (I know, shut up) about the intended mosque. In it she says that she views this mosque as a blow to fundamentalist muslims everywhere.....and I wish someone could explain how building a mosque by the buildings they destroyed would be bad for Islamic terrorists.
0
Reply
Male 2,552
Matt Bors is a frickin` idiot.
0
Reply
Female 1,593
ahahahaha stupid native americans.... or whatever they like to be called these days

one day they will learn, if you`re weak you tend not to be able to hold on to land for too long

---

When you graduate high school you`re allowed to have an opinion. Until then, leave the interwebz.
0
Reply
Female 172
as a new yorker. if they open a mosque I will be furious.

yes, back in the day colonial americans were effing pricks. we know that.

two wrongs dont make a right.
0
Reply
Female 876
I wonder if the families of Muslims killed in the 9-11 attacks are also offended...
0
Reply
Male 496
Why can`t people have any understanding or compassion for victims of 9-11? I understand the desire to promote understanding between faiths, but is building a mosque right across from the WTC- which would offend some 9-11 survivors- really a necessary means to acheive that end? 9-11 survivors have suffered enough already; why do something that unnecessarily compounds their suffering? How about some understanding about what it`s like to experience terrorists ram a plane into your office building? Certainly portraying them as ignorant blowhards, as this cartoon does, is tasteless to say the least.
0
Reply
Male 776
ahahahaha stupid native americans.... or whatever they like to be called these days

one day they will learn, if you`re weak you tend not to be able to hold on to land for too long
0
Reply
Male 2,307
Gangfcuk flamewar here it comes!

I`m Native American, so I`ll speak on behalf of my side of the flame. Anyway...drat Islam.
0
Reply
Female 934
Did Daniel Clowes illustrate this? This looks a lot like his work in 20th Century Eightball.
0
Reply
Male 1,610
I`m not christian and I think it`s a bad idea. The terrorists were screaming allah akbar just before the planes hit, and now those words will be constantly repeated at the site. It doesn`t take a rocket scientist to see how that would be distasteful to some people, regardless of their religious affiliations.
0
Reply
Male 953
"Two wrongs don`t make a right!"

No but three "LEFTS" do.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Well just one.

America was never "Indian Land".

They didn`t believe in land ownership. They didn`t own this.

Colonists "Settled" here. We never "Conquered" anything.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Nah. No flames.

This cartoon is just too stupid for flames.
0
Reply
2,838
some Americans want the mosque, none of the indains wanted churches...thats the difference in the situations. its not about whats being proposed or where, but rather who is accepting it.
0
Reply
Male 487
inb4 poostorm
0
Reply
Male 415
Makes so much god damn sense doesnt it?
0
Reply
Male 4,867
well...this is gonna turn into one big gangfcuk of a flame war.
0
Reply
Female 268
hmmmm.
0
Reply
Male 4,807
dax2009.. "You know nothing about Islam, do you fancylad?"

That`s a pretty vague comment
0
Reply
Male 98
Not funny.
0
Reply
Female 322
You know nothing about Islam, do you fancylad?
0
Reply
Male 186
Fail.
0
Reply
Female 1,427
Hahaha. Win.
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Let the debate begging
0
Reply
Male 395
Two wrongs don`t make a right!
0
Reply
Male 3,255
I say build it. I do think it`s kinda in poor taste to build it there, but at least if we do built it there we will piss off some conservatives, and that`s worth ANYTHING.
0
Reply
Female 129
Hmm!
0
Reply
Male 20,911
Link: NYers Still Opposed To Ground Zero Mosque [Pic] [Rate Link] - Wait a minute, no one said logic would be introduced into this argument!
0
Reply