Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 47    Average: 3.1/5]
95 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 39962
Rating: 3.1
Category: Sports
Date: 06/27/10 11:06 AM

95 Responses to More World Cup Shame: England Supporters [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18499 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 10:57 am
    Link: More World Cup Shame: England Supporters - Yeah, England was destroyed on the pitch 4-1, but these guys in the stands didn`t help the cause one bit.
  2. Profile photo of Joshyboy989
    Joshyboy989 Male 13-17
    169 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:10 am
    hey, do not disrespect the morph-suit.
  3. Profile photo of Zieveraar
    Zieveraar Male 30-39
    415 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:11 am
    4-1 actually, that second goal was not allowed for some reason most likely only the referees and their bank accounts will know!

    And yes, these guys did make me raise an eyebrow today.
  4. Profile photo of PayN8tention
    PayN8tention Male 18-29
    907 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:12 am
    How did Thing 1 and Thing 2 get out?
  5. Profile photo of WolfStar
    WolfStar Female 18-29
    455 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:15 am
    4-1. The referee apparently lost the use of his eyeballs when the second goal was scored. Not that it makes up for the rest of the cruddy performance. Or those guys.
  6. Profile photo of TJAW
    TJAW Male 13-17
    610 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:16 am
    I four-one would like to forget the final result.
    Although to be honest, I didn`t think England would win.
  7. Profile photo of Kraehe
    Kraehe Male 18-29
    7 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:16 am
    4-1
  8. Profile photo of SirLunchalot
    SirLunchalot Male 30-39
    118 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:22 am
    4-1, actually. Should have been 4-2 though...
  9. Profile photo of Mantolwen
    Mantolwen Female 18-29
    387 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:23 am
    Should`ve been 4-2. Stupid linesman.
  10. Profile photo of DarkFerret
    DarkFerret Male 18-29
    2750 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:29 am
    haha, wow... you can almost taste the shame
  11. Profile photo of auburnjunky
    auburnjunky Male 30-39
    10339 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:32 am
    If the second goal was allowed (by England), the end would have been different.
  12. Profile photo of Gerry1of1
    Gerry1of1 Male 50-59
    36192 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:36 am
    I won`t say anything `cause I know the Americans were half naked and covered in body paint {which I suspect is really house paint] so, Nope! Not saying a word.
  13. Profile photo of baileyabb
    baileyabb Female 18-29
    896 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:37 am
    4-1 tard. It`s about time Germany finished something.
  14. Profile photo of pigpen30
    pigpen30 Male 18-29
    14 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:43 am
    it was 4-1 that is karma coming back to bite them in the ass cause of the 1966 goal that was not over the line
  15. Profile photo of bophus
    bophus Male 30-39
    472 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:45 am
    "auburnjunky - If the second goal was allowed (by England), the end would have been different."

    yeah the final score would have been 4-2 and they still would have lost.
  16. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    257 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:50 am
    @Mantolwen. Sadly, it really should have been about 8-3. But we lasted a day longer than the USA so that`s something to cheer about :) Sad isn`t it......
  17. Profile photo of DeathToLems
    DeathToLems Female 18-29
    1435 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:56 am
    that coke bottle looks so small in his giant hands O_O
  18. Profile photo of MrBaloo
    MrBaloo Male 18-29
    7 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 11:58 am
    I guess if you consider being knocked out in the same round as lasting longer... then sure you lasted longer than USA
  19. Profile photo of belunan
    belunan Male 30-39
    1507 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:04 pm
    "But we lasted a day longer than the USA so that`s something to cheer about :)"

    /facepalm

    Does it hurt when you try to think?
  20. Profile photo of iiiihatejmac
    iiiihatejmac Female 18-29
    477 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:12 pm
    HAHAH
  21. Profile photo of willyfoofoo
    willyfoofoo Male 18-29
    17 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:13 pm
    my word we were crap today, i say today the whole tournament. time for a revamp of the squad!

    on a lighter note im liking the david bowie hair wigs.


  22. Profile photo of Nickel_Creek
    Nickel_Creek Male 18-29
    76 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:14 pm
    "But we lasted a day longer than the USA so that`s something to cheer about :)"
    but didnt they both get knocked out in the same round?
  23. Profile photo of SvampeBob
    SvampeBob Male 18-29
    3076 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:16 pm
    XD WTF?
  24. Profile photo of JudasInc
    JudasInc Male 18-29
    35 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:22 pm
    "If we dressed like douchebags even more..."

    /facepalm

    Does it hurt when you try to think?
  25. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    257 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:23 pm
    "But we lasted a day longer than the USA so that`s something to cheer about :)"

    /facepalm

    Does it hurt when you try to think?

    Does it hurt you when you try to understand a JOKE? ;) Plainly, the fact that we played a day after the USA and got knocked out a day later in the SAME ROUND means nothing at all. BUT that LITERALLY is all we have to cheer about. Hence the `Sad isn`t it...`
  26. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    257 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:26 pm
    In thw same way, I would hope that our American friends will quickly tot up the overall results and scores in the group and last 16 stages and declare their team BETTER than England. And they`d be justified in doing so, at least until they play each other again.
  27. Profile photo of CoeshCoesh
    CoeshCoesh Male 13-17
    131 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:28 pm
    Note: it was 4-1, not 4-2?
  28. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    257 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:31 pm
    However, the actual message they`re conveying is `See no evil, hear no evil (guy performing the well known international sign language for `not happy`), speak no evil. Three wise monkeys. Simple.
  29. Profile photo of malikymoo
    malikymoo Female 18-29
    2029 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:35 pm
    haha i saw that on the telly
  30. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12151 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:39 pm
    The Germans must have been sh*tting themselves when England brought HESKEY on! F*cking onion.
  31. Profile photo of FIRST_poster
    FIRST_poster Male 18-29
    970 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:48 pm
    @davymid:
    actually, we didn`t
  32. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:50 pm
    GREENMAN FAIL. seriously you can`t go WHITEMAN... just doesn`t work as well...
  33. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    257 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 12:52 pm
    The most unsatisfying thing about the day is that we now know how pooe England are, but not how good Germany really are. Anyway, good luck for the next round(s). Beers are on you boys if you win (yet again).
  34. Profile photo of ChrisRlive
    ChrisRlive Male 18-29
    260 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:11 pm
    It was 4-1 I-A-B...
  35. Profile photo of madduck
    madduck Female 50-59
    7421 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:15 pm
    Can you spell massacre?
  36. Profile photo of BenTheBug
    BenTheBug Male 18-29
    1195 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:30 pm

  37. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:37 pm
    Note: it was 4-1, not 4-2?

    It was 4-1 I-A-B...

    That`s a large part of the problem (and part of the reason for the subtitle on the `Fancyclad`s C: pictures` thread).

    England scored a second goal to draw level 2-2. The ball was 2-3 feet behind the goal line, confirmed by the cameras which point straight along the line. The ref decided that the ball hadn`t gone past the line, i.e. the ref was obviously and provably wrong.

    Up until that point, England had possession most of the time (FIFA website has continuous monitoring of possession) and were on a par with Germany. After that bullpoo decision, they were demoralised and faded away. Had the ref not been utterly and provably wrong, the entire match could have gone differently.

    Anyone who says the game was a massacre and suchlike obviously didn`t watch any of it and is just going on the score.
  38. Profile photo of Swisskid10
    Swisskid10 Male 13-17
    103 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:38 pm
    @ChrisRlive
    4-2 one of England`s goals wasn`t counted despite clearly being a goal.
  39. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:43 pm
    Anyone who wants to see the point, here`s a clip. Dismal quality - looks like unsynchonised video of a TV screen - but it`s very clear.

    Which side of the line does the ball bounce?
  40. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:49 pm
    but didnt they both get knocked out in the same round?

    Yes. The person you`re replying to is, to be polite, wrong.

    Although it would have been more irritating if the USA had beaten Ghana, because then other fools would have proclaimed that the USA team was obviously better than the England team (not understanding the difference between playing one of the best teams in the world and playing Ghana).
  41. Profile photo of FIRST_poster
    FIRST_poster Male 18-29
    970 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:49 pm
    4:1
    what the referee says counts.
    germany got some pretty wrong decisions in the last game.
    feels bad man, but thats the way it is.
  42. Profile photo of AbiElectric
    AbiElectric Female 18-29
    172 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:50 pm
    Angilion even after the goal was disallowed England were slightly better then the Germans, until about 10 minutes after half time. After about 55-60 minutes England were indeed slaughtered. Even at the start of the match Germany were killing them. England were only decent in the match for about 20 minutes.

    The official score was 4-1, even though a perfectly good goal was disallowed. But would a 4-2 score to Germany have changed who won? No because at the end of the day Germany are good and the England team are not. Just look at the group stages.
  43. Profile photo of starfl4ke
    starfl4ke Female 18-29
    349 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:56 pm
    We did play crap. But I think that our attitude would have changed and things would have gone differently had the ref not been a goddamned moron.
  44. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 1:57 pm
    I disagree with the extent of your claims.

    I think Germany are a better team and did play a better game, but I think the gap is not as great as you say it is.

    I also think that the wrongly disallowed goal had some effect on how the teams played the reat of the game, not none at all.

    I think England would have lost anyway. I`m irritated at the widespread eagerness to exaggerate how badly they did. Slaughter, massacre, killing...no. Wrong.
  45. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:13 pm
    Angilion:
    Americans would not make that claim because we simply don`t care. The only joy we would get from winning the world cup is that is pisses everyone else off. National Pride over a childish looking soccer game? meh...
  46. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25407 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:13 pm
    nice effort!
  47. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    257 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:17 pm
    Angilion, seeing as my joke about staying in the tournament a day longer than the USA has met with universal contempt, I may as well go the whole hog:
    The stats show nothing of the game. Germany cut the midfield and back four apart every single venture into the English half. Upson, apart from scoring, had a shocker. Gerrard was poor. There was no coherence or plan to the English game at all. It was like they turned up expecting to play a different sport. Every senior England player apart from David James failed to step up to the mark. To argue that point is as futile as me expecting anyone to get my (plainly) crap joke.
  48. Profile photo of DickenMcHunt
    DickenMcHunt Male 18-29
    1299 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:25 pm
    SO glad Thing 1 and Thing 2 were able to make it to the games though, they`re HUGE fans...
  49. Profile photo of Froggybuster
    Froggybuster Male 13-17
    122 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:39 pm
    Ahem, I think you`ll find England scored 3 goals...
  50. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:46 pm
    number696969
    I only know who wins or losses these games from IAB posts. I bet it`s the same for many Americans. You could really fool us good by telling us made up scores and we would believe that Antarctica won, for example.
  51. Profile photo of matrixie
    matrixie Female 18-29
    718 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:52 pm
    Think you`ll find it was 4-1...
  52. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 2:54 pm
    Americans would not make that claim because we simply don`t care. The only joy we would get from winning the world cup is that is pisses everyone else off. National Pride over a childish looking soccer game? meh...

    You don`t speak for all people of the USA.

    Most sports can look childish to people who don`t understand them. Rounders? A game for schoolgirls. Throwing balls into hoops? A few minutes of fun at a fairground. Wearing yards of padding, running into each other and stopping the game every 20 seconds? Obviously very silly.

    As for national pride...the USA is noted for national pride in sports in which it doesn`t compete against other nations. As you would say, meh.
  53. Profile photo of belunan
    belunan Male 30-39
    1507 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:00 pm
    "Does it hurt you when you try to understand a JOKE?"

    Sorry if I didn`t recognize it as the joke you intended. This place is so thoroughly saturated with anti-US insults, it seemed like just one more. My bad.
  54. Profile photo of ElSombrero
    ElSombrero Male 13-17
    716 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:17 pm
    I saw those two.

    And Germany won, England lost. Get over it. The score was 4-1, by the way.
  55. Profile photo of Agalloch
    Agalloch Male 18-29
    5 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:18 pm
    Soccer/Football is boring.
  56. Profile photo of wtfstfu
    wtfstfu Male 13-17
    112 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:19 pm
    score was 4-1 england didnt score 3 goals dumbasses how can u drat up watching sports they may have scored 2 but the score was 4-1
  57. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:26 pm
    Soccer gets respect when players stop faking injuries. When a country fakes an injury or foul to get an 11 meter kick, and then wins the game by 1 point, how can anyone even be proud, and not ashamed? I would rather lose than win like a p*ssssay. Not that the England Germany game had any of that (I didn`t watch it so maybe it did or not?)
  58. Profile photo of syke22
    syke22 Male 18-29
    1136 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:32 pm
    BEAT DOWN!
  59. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 3:50 pm
    Tagline fixed. The referee`s decision is final fancy. And I`ll be damned if England get awarded extra goals on my watch.
  60. Profile photo of jimbobsthebe
    jimbobsthebe Male 18-29
    639 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 5:19 pm
    @wtfstfu,

    Most sports teams have a psychological advantage if they know they are ahead in a game. So if we level 2-2 we`d be more likely to strive to win. However, when the decision was given against us, the team felt as if it was impossible to get the 2 extra goals to win the game and therefore played badly.

    I`m not bitter that the Germans beat us, they definitely deserved to win. They were the better team. However, the decision made to not give England the goal would have had a huge impact on moral and determination of the players.
  61. Profile photo of mal_BB
    mal_BB Male 18-29
    1231 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 5:33 pm
    Africans finally have the chance to tell the ENGLISH to go back to their own drating country!
  62. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 5:56 pm
    God i`m sick of hearing about soccer.
  63. Profile photo of iiiihatejmac
    iiiihatejmac Female 18-29
    477 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 6:02 pm
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
  64. Profile photo of She-said
    She-said Female 18-29
    33 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 7:01 pm
    I hate football.
  65. Profile photo of grahamm
    grahamm Male 18-29
    249 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 7:13 pm
    i am so gutted. not even gonna try to stick up for our team. anyone know any hockey clubs in the leeds area?
  66. Profile photo of AbiElectric
    AbiElectric Female 18-29
    172 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 7:27 pm
    Angilion, even at first glance I would call 4-1 a slaughtering! You can`t put it any other way. Even had the score been 4-2 Germany, still woulda been a slaughtering. And that`s before you even look at the game play.

    Sorry but England were abysmal for 6o-70 minutes of that game.
  67. Profile photo of LandoGriffin
    LandoGriffin Male 30-39
    3844 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 8:31 pm
    Well, I saw the game, and I saw Lampard tie the game at 2-2, and I saw the ball bounce inside the goal, but the referee did not award the goal, and the rest of the game could never be the same after that. Who knows what would have happened if England had tied the score?
  68. Profile photo of GuardinGnome
    GuardinGnome Male 18-29
    2893 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 8:46 pm
    football/soccer/whatever=suckage.
  69. Profile photo of IkeRay
    IkeRay Male 18-29
    2705 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 9:05 pm
    "Sorry but England were abysmal for this world cup"

    FTFY
  70. Profile photo of Swisskid10
    Swisskid10 Male 13-17
    103 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 9:21 pm
    I frankly don`t care what the ref says the ref was wrong. We have video evidence to prove it and final proof for why FIFA should finally institute a video refereeing system. It was 4 bloody 2!
  71. Profile photo of Tonyjet
    Tonyjet Male 18-29
    3299 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 10:21 pm
    "I frankly don`t care what the ref says the ref was wrong. We have video evidence to prove it and final proof for why FIFA should finally institute a video refereeing system. It was 4 bloody 2!"

    you can argue that it changed the whole complexion of the game, it would have been way different if the score was 2-2 as supposed to 3-1
  72. Profile photo of fivezones
    fivezones Male 40-49
    1021 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 10:29 pm
    Why doesn`t soccer have instant replay and a scoreboard time clock that everyone can see (instead of a secret stopwatch in one officials pocket that no one knows when the half or game exactly ends, or when time is really running or stopped). I understand when soccer was invented back in blahblah year that instant replay and giant time clocks controlled by a time keeping official didn`t exist but it`s really time to modernize. Drat.
  73. Profile photo of inaria
    inaria Female 18-29
    1515 posts
    June 27, 2010 at 10:53 pm
    They look like thing 1 and thing 2 from the cat in the hat.
  74. Profile photo of ravensky
    ravensky Female 18-29
    106 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 1:20 am
    "Why doesn`t soccer have instant replay"

    Because unlike American `football`, soccer does not stop and start every five seconds.

    The fact that the game is still playing while they show replays means there is a possibility that the fans will miss something happening now while watching something that happened a minute ago.

    Your point about having a visible clock i can`t really see anything wrong with although tickets to soccer games over here are expensive enough without having to add extra for the installation and maintenance of a giant electrical score board
  75. Profile photo of spanner2601
    spanner2601 Male 18-29
    2 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 1:29 am
    "why doesn`t soccer have instant replay" well if they did it would take away the part of the game where people get away with cheating or get to roll around on the floor like a great big girl for 10 minutes. I play rugby hence the comment.
  76. Profile photo of elbat
    elbat Female 18-29
    188 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 3:29 am
    I remenber that momment!I thought that while wearing costumes and losing it`s the moment you look like a dumb-ass
  77. Profile photo of conky
    conky Male 30-39
    24 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 4:49 am
    @spanner2601- I remember being given the choice to play hockey with the girls or rugby with the boys at high school.....natch....I chose hockey, `cos I`m wee....and I`m a pervert.......1 lesson it took for me to change my mind and play rugby....None of those fat egg-chasing c**** could catch me......The f***ing girls could, though....you fat c*** :D
  78. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 5:49 am
    Why doesn`t soccer have instant replay and a scoreboard time clock that everyone can see (instead of a secret stopwatch in one officials pocket that no one knows when the half or game exactly ends, or when time is really running or stopped).

    We don`t have instant replays because football is all about free flow of play. You just need to look at the advantage rule to see that. It doesn`t stop anywhere near as often as other games, so instant replays would slow and interrupt the game. I am not against the introduction of goal-line tech, but I would be against full replays.

    Regarding the timing, it`s very simple rules - the clock does not stop, ever. It counts upwards to 90 minutes. When the 90 minutes are almost over, the referee announces (via the 4th official) how many minutes will be added due to lost time during the game (called "injury time"). So everyone does, in fact, know how much time is left.
  79. Profile photo of Zebrameat
    Zebrameat Male 13-17
    107 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 5:53 am
    I think Germany WAS better than england, but I don´t think we would have won if the seccond goal had been acknowledged
  80. Profile photo of ChrisMunich
    ChrisMunich Male 18-29
    383 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 7:25 am
    It`s a shame so many people are whining about the whole 4-2/4-1. Yes, it was a poor call, but so was Wembley 66, and all of a sudden NOW it`s an outrage that there`s no instant replay? England had their moments but let`s face it, they were far, far inferior to Germany, who finally played a match like they could and should.
  81. Profile photo of meepmaker
    meepmaker Male 30-39
    6694 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 7:50 am
    Thing 1 and Thing 2.
  82. Profile photo of jamie76
    jamie76 Male 30-39
    2346 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 8:17 am
    Enlgand...maybe before the next world cup you won`t talk so much smack about how great you are!

    Karma = bitch
  83. Profile photo of VascoV
    VascoV Male 30-39
    56 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 8:19 am
    The problem with the weird colorful outfits is that you look even more ridiculous when you lose
  84. Profile photo of witest
    witest Male 18-29
    1 post
    June 28, 2010 at 9:12 am
    First of all, for all AMERICANS who hate England football team, I am glad that the U.S. team lost just so they get a chance to go home and practice what you guys do best, "dancing with the stars" or "Gridiron". It was a poor call and the game will be a much different game if England`s 2nd goal was allowed. Face it, you hate England just because we are GOOD in real FOOTBALL (Yes, the game where you kick the ball with your foot and not use your hand all the time). Do yourselves a favor... before you complain about ENGLAND football team, get your terminology correct.
  85. Profile photo of paddy215
    paddy215 Male 18-29
    1677 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 10:43 am
    The referee was like 40 yards from the goal line when the ball went about a foot over the line for a split second ... he can`t give a goal if he doesn`t see it. Anyway, Germany absolutely trounced England, 4-1 was flattering, it was embarrassing to watch. Heres a link for all you bitchy little English hypocrits :)England "goal"
  86. Profile photo of Squircifer
    Squircifer Male 40-49
    49 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 10:56 am
    is it me, or does no one really give a rats ass about football, save FOUR-ONcE every four years?
  87. Profile photo of ChrisMunich
    ChrisMunich Male 18-29
    383 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 12:57 pm
    Squircifer, it`s just you.
  88. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12390 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 2:01 pm
    The referee was like 40 yards from the goal line when the ball went about a foot over the line for a split second

    But the linesman who actually made the call wasn`t.
  89. Profile photo of Mickets
    Mickets Male 30-39
    246 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 3:39 pm
    Squircifer: "is it me, or does no one really give a rats ass about football, save FOUR-ONcE every four years?"

    It`s you.
  90. Profile photo of Max_Normal
    Max_Normal Male 30-39
    501 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 4:42 pm
    "Mickets
    Male, 30-39, S. America
    151 Posts Monday, June 28, 2010 3:39:55 PM
    Squircifer: "is it me, or does no one really give a rats ass about football, save FOUR-ONcE every four years?"

    It`s you."

    And me actually. I am proud of our great heritage of being absolutely useless at everything we ever invented though. This and of course because we have managed to become probably the second most hated nation on earth for various reasons, most of which we are still unaccountably happy about :) and even the first most hated nation hates us. So all the referees and linesmen hate us and that is a really big advantage to being useless at sport. How the Germans got away with being the third most hated nation on earth evades me, you don`t see the Krauts being slagged off on these forums. We are good at motorsport though, but only because the Merkins haven`t figured out how to make cars properly or tracks that bend both way yet.
  91. Profile photo of SuperSmash
    SuperSmash Male 18-29
    3758 posts
    June 28, 2010 at 9:57 pm
    The international appeal of soccer is the result European colonialism.

    Other countries came later, but it started because of colonialism.
  92. Profile photo of Zaokii
    Zaokii Female 18-29
    78 posts
    June 30, 2010 at 4:30 pm
    Look at the guy in the bottom right corner..
  93. Profile photo of xxPinkxx
    xxPinkxx Female 18-29
    3830 posts
    July 1, 2010 at 2:36 pm
    Soccar sucks( hockey is way better), but the fans are what make it awesome.

Leave a Reply