9/11 Truths For Dummies [Pic]

Submitted by: rca26_1 7 years ago in

Yeesh, this one makes you think a bit...
There are 233 comments:
Male 812
I believe these counter conspiracy theorists are funded by the government. Why else this stupid debate?
0
Reply
Male 94
For those who believe in grandiose conspiracies such as this I have the following to say: you can throw together as many coincidences as possible, say whatever ignorance about engineering as you want but you undoubtedly have consistency flaws. How can you even believe the government is so competent to pull this off? Look at any drating project. The motives don`t even match well as such a genius government would realize there are other ways to accomplish the end objective (WMD`s in Iraq could always have been stated, though I don`t believe its a conspiracy). You could counter these points but when it comes down to it, conspiracy theories are exciting and interesting but reality is not so much. Get your mind around the real issues instead of entertaining such idiotic ideas.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
Given his proximity to the Afghan rebel groups, being a person that was providing funding, I don`t see how he and the CIA could avoid overlapping trained personnel while operating in a country with less than 10% paved roads.
Intentionally or not, the CIA supplied his group because of common interests before `89.

From there, it`s naive to think that the same personnel with surplus American and Soviet hardware/material were not used against the US and it`s allies. Your own Connect the Dots link pointed out that they stayed in contact and even operated after the veterans had move to safer, more civilized nations.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
CrakrJak, in an interview, I believe aired before mid-2003, Prince Bandar explained that he did not expect Bin Laden to attack the US, having seen him at one or more weddings in 2000-2001 (between relatives of each man, I think Jimmy Carter was at one.)

Paraphrasing the prince: "Osama walked up and took my hand, thanking me for introducing (us) to the Americans back then..." -(I think this was Larry King show, a rare time the I watched television.)
This indicated to me that Bin Laden:
- was among the Afghan anti-Marxist rebels.
- direct or not, benefited from CIA provided resources.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@d_katman:

"Planes, as you may have noticed from previous examples don`t usually destroy buildings made of steel, let alone make them suddenly plummet down without warning... "

You have a big list of examples where large passenger jets have collided with skyscrapers, have you?

What do you EXPECT to see when passenger jets hit large 100+ storey skyscrapers? Because as far as I`m aware, you DON`T have any previous examples of this scenario occuring to point to as your basis for expectations!

I mean, for pity`s sake; what on EARTH are you basing your "jet planes can`t destroy skyscrapers" assumption? There isn`t any precident to refer to!

@dannyseven

"I don`t think you understand insurance fraud. That would just be grand theft auto."

Deliberately trying to get your vehicle stolen in order to collect on insurance is insurance fraud.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
CodeJockey: From your own link - According to CNN journalist Peter Bergen, known for conducting the first television interview with Osama bin Laden in 1997. The story about bin Laden and the CIA — that the CIA funded bin Laden or trained bin Laden — is simply a folk myth. There`s no evidence of this. In fact, there are very few things that Bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and the U.S. government agree on. They all agree that they didn`t have a relationship in the 1980s. And they wouldn`t have needed to. Bin Laden had his own money, he was anti-American and he was operating secretly and independently. The real story here is the CIA did not understand who Osama was until 1996, when they set up a unit to really start tracking him.
0
Reply
Female 1,306
Eh, I wouldn`t doubt it. Anything to control the masses. We had to begin major entry into the middle east sometime, right?
0
Reply
Male 5,626
CrakrJak,
A. I do not have a tin hat. It`s just that when 7 or 8 thousand people say "Hey, that`s suspicious!" I ask "What exactly is out of place?"

B. I`d like to point something out about the link you gave: If John O`Neil was the site manager of WTC security then, he work for or with Jonathan Bush (cousin) and Marvin Bush (younger brother.) If O`Neil, having contacts in the intelligence world, was so personally alarmed that he ordered a series of drills, don`t you think he had to explain to his counterparts his cause for alarm?
Those three people in one place at one time is something out of place.

In telling the story of "Connect the Dots," the time line is missing some key steps in the pre-establishment of "The Base" between 1979 and 1986.
0
Reply
Male 66
false flag attack proof.
heres a link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident
0
Reply
Male 71
@ Musuko42:
"After all, you don`t steal your own car for insurance fraud...you just leave it unlocked in a bad area at night."

I don`t think you understand insurance fraud. That would just be grand theft auto.
0
Reply
Male 1,835
"If such a conspiracy DID exist, all they`d need to do is make sure security is lax, then wait."

If someone comes close to doing to carrying out a terrorist attack, or carries out a small-scale attack the government would be accused of being lax on security. And if the attack wasn`t as successful as, say, demolishing important buildings in new york, then there could be no war, the government would be accused with being war-mongering.

"Why not just do the plane thing. Or just the bomb thing."
Planes, as you may have noticed from previous examples don`t usually destroy buildings made of steel, let alone make them suddenly plummet down without warning...
bombs, the amount of explosives that would be required to fell a building would be immensly more than can be taken through a building with such a large amount of people. An army of suicide bombers would basically have to walk in an possitionthemselves throughout the building; again the problem
0
Reply
Male 141
Sooooooo... why would they rig the buildings with explosives and also fly planes into them? Why not just do the plane thing. Or just the bomb thing. Not really necessary or practical to do both. Also, most fires aren`t fueled by gallons of jet fuel, so there`s that.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@fancylady

Exactly. Also, why go through all the effort to fake a terrorist attack when there are plenty of real terrorists out there eager to do the job themselves?

If such a conspiracy DID exist, all they`d need to do is make sure security is lax, then wait.

After all, you don`t steal your own car for insurance fraud...you just leave it unlocked in a bad area at night.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@CodeJockey

"OK, that IS frightening. How exactly does a foreigner/non-military person learn the execution dates of a mission that transmitted encoded in a shared shifting key?"

*shrugs* I`ve seen what government IT can be like.

A little lax security, or someone sneaking out info, isn`t inimaginable.
0
Reply
Female 864
The thing that makes the 911 conspiracy seem extremely far fetched to me is that so many people would have had to keep this huge secret.I don`t even though 3 people who can keep a secret let alone the possible hundreds that would have to have been in on it for it to work.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
Codejockey: John O`Neil was the man responsible for the saftey drills at the WTC.

Also, click on `Connecting the dots`. If that doesn`t help you take off your tin foil hat, Nothing will.
0
Reply
Male 66
@Musuko42
"Oh and also, in the past America bombed it`s own navy ships, killing it`s own military men. We then blamed it on some other country (i dont remember who) so we could go to war with them."

"YOU DON`T REMEMBER WHO? OR WHEN?!
You make that kind of accusation without even REMEMBERING EXACTLY WHAT YOU`RE ACCUSING?!?!?"

"You`re a bloody joke."


that goes for you too you bloody joke.
if u dont know about false flags incidents then piss off! jk you limey bast ard
i stumbled upon this on wikipedia
gulf of tonkin
0
Reply
Male 5,626
"It`s not inconceivable that the terrorists might learn of such exercises and deliberately attack on those dates in order to cause confusion."

OK, that IS frightening. How exactly does a foreigner/non-military person learn the execution dates of a mission that transmitted encoded in a shared shifting key?
The pilots flying the mission are not told what they are doing ahead of time.
0
Reply
Male 66
@davymid
ya good link. but that video doesnt apply to the 9/11 conspiracy. some what it does...i do think some of the conspiracys on 9/11 are ridicules but i do think people like the history channel, popular mechanics, glen beck, well basically anyone one whos in the main stream media, use those ridiculous conspiracys to make the conspiracy look more ridiculous. just look who sold there souls and sold out...o and ufos are real.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
"...was known to be in contact with Osama Bin Laden..."
There are still some dominoes missing that say Bin Laden in particular.
If anything, that list says Pakistan, not Afghanistan and no where in it does it say Iraq.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
"How many is "so many"? I`d bet good money that you have no idea how many were done and you`re just accepting the claim on faith."
In the interviews of survivors, the manager of a data center in building 2, 30th floor said that there were randomly timed evacuation drills for the entire two weeks before that event. He was so annoyed with the drills, that he gave up on coming to the office the day of the event.
This seems to indicate that the drill frequency was higher than unusual.

I accept very little on faith alone.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@5Cats

Yes, you could go on, but please don`t.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]Angilion, it`s not that people WANT the attacks to be USA based[/quote]

Yes it is, because they`re *starting* from the assumption that the attacks were carried out by USA gov`t/USA business/USA Secret Conspiracy Organisation, ignoring anything which contradicts that, continuing to make untrue statements to support it, etc.
0
Reply
Male 40,772
@ZNaught - yes, that camera has poor resolution and was supposedly `leaked` twice (!) yet the frame which would show the actual aircraft is still [email protected]!
@davymid - Nope, not a troofer, I just don`t believe the `official story` in regards to the Pentagon attack. LOOK at ZNaught`s recounting!
[quote]the central mass of the plane formed a mass which then went flaming through the building almost like a projectile because of the speed of the impact[/quote]
Yet the bodies of those inside were all recovered? Mostly undamaged? Yet the 6 ton engines didn`t even make a dent? Yet the damage looks exactly like a shaped charge (bomb) not an aircraft strike? Where`s the tail section?
I could go on, but I gotta go. Anyhow calling those who disagree with you names is part of counter-intelligence, yes there are nuts out there, but there`s also people with real questions.
Remeber the Maine!!! Oh wait...
0
Reply
Male 684
Every bit of "scientific" evidence i`ve seen about how buildings collapse etc put forward to someone in their basement. I`ve then seen get discredited by a authority in that field like architect`s, engineers or scientists.

As for the accusations the Government knew it was going to happen but let it. The Gov. had info in various departments and sources. But no guy in overiding control above it all. so the dots didnt get put together and the attack stopped.

Wan`t to see a repeat performance of Gov. incompetence(if it can be called that) Look at the Christmas bomber which only failed because trigger didn`t go off. Loads of different organisations had different bits of Intel on him but no one collaborated it together before the attack.

Please wake up and live in the real world!
0
Reply
Male 55
Asumming that most 9/11 myths are based on `Loose Change`, I submit this for further reading.

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/
0
Reply
Male 2,159
Well there you go, then. Some lines on the internet prove that Bush did it. Aren`t we all bored of 9/11 yet?
0
Reply
Male 17,511
Soon after the September 11 attacks, Larry Silverstein declared his intent to rebuild, though ran into dispute with his insurers over whether the attacks constituted one or two occurrences. A settlement was reached in 2004, with insurers agreeing to pay out $4.55 billion. - Wikipedia

Silverstein has put the cost of the entire redevelopment project at up to $12 billion over 10 years to rebuild World Trade Center.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
"We were able to figure out how much the attacks cost -- [about $500,000]. We were able to figure out who in Al-Qaeda provided the funds" - Michael Jacobson, Senior adviser to the U.S. Treasury Department`s Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence.

The FBI had worked in tandem with India’s intelligence services to track where the 9/11 “money trail” led to The head of the ISI (Pakistan`s secret service), Gen. Mahmud Ahmed, who was responsible for authorizing the transfer by Omar Sayeed Sheikh of $100,000 to 9/11 alleged hijacker Mohammed Atta. Gen. Ahmed was known to be in contact with Osama Bin Laden.

Two numbers scrawled in a notebook that belonged to terrorism suspect Zacarias Moussaoui recorded the control numbers for two Western Union wire transfers in which suspected Al-Qaida coordinator Ramzi Binalshibh, using an alias, sent Moussaoui $14,000 from Germany in early August 2001, before he went to a Minnesota flight school to learn
0
Reply
Male 2,850
"Oh and also, in the past America bombed it`s own navy ships, killing it`s own military men. We then blamed it on some other country (i dont remember who) so we could go to war with them."

YOU DON`T REMEMBER WHO? OR WHEN?!

You make that kind of accusation without even REMEMBERING EXACTLY WHAT YOU`RE ACCUSING?!?!

You`re a bloody joke.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@davymid

To be fair, CrakrJak is shooting down the truthers in this debate.

It`s interesting to be on the same side as him for a change.

When the debate about gay christians with guns getting abortions at left-wing rallys comes up, then it`ll be back to normal. :P
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@Stelly

"What gets me is that on the morning of 9/11, NORAD was running a drill on what would happen if a hijacked plan hit a building. In fact, there is recording of a pilot saying "Is this real life" after being told to scramble to NYC.

Also, on the same say as the London subway bombings in July `05, they were running an exercise on what to do if bombs went off."

It`s not inconceivable that the terrorists might learn of such exercises and deliberately attack on those dates in order to cause confusion.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
Oh and also, in the past America bombed it`s own navy ships, killing it`s own military men. We then blamed it on some other country (i dont remember who) so we could go to war with them.
0
Reply
Male 4,793
"
Why do you conspiracy theorists *want* to believe the attacks on the USA were carried out by the USA government/a USA business as an insurance fraud (WTF? are you insane?)/<insert secret conspiracy group here>? "

Because, we want other people to stop being so damn ignorant and look at what is going on. We also want the people responsible to pay. If i had a loved one in the WTC, bush would already have a bullet in his head. Also, don`t say that i just don`t like bush, I only don`t like him because he killed thousands. I could care less about presidents, every single one will do bad and good. But mass murder is unacceptable.
0
Reply
Male 3,915
Angilion, it`s not that people WANT the attacks to be USA based......it`s just saying that it isn`t unlikely that it wasn`t a shot-in-the-dark attack on the U.S.

It`s not outrageous to think the Oil Tycoon George W. Bush saw we were going to run out of oil eventually, saw a possibility, and took it...
0
Reply
Male 12,365
I spotted someone questioning why there were "so many" evacuation drills in the WTC.

i) How many is "so many"? I`d bet good money that you have no idea how many were done and you`re just accepting the claim on faith.

ii) All buildings should carry out evacuation drills frequently. I work in a bingo club and we carry them out monthly. In a bingo club. Not an important or vulnerable place.

iii) The WTC was large (and therefore a fire was more likely somewhere in it), inherently difficult to evacuate because of how many stories it had and it had been attacked before. If I had been in charge of it, I would have ordered regular and frequent evacuation drills. Those drills are a pain in the arse, but they save lives if an evacuation is needed.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
I have a question from another angle:

Why do you conspiracy theorists *want* to believe the attacks on the USA were carried out by the USA government/a USA business as an insurance fraud (WTF? are you insane?)/<insert secret conspiracy group here>?

Does it make you feel safer? Do you feel special for "knowing the truth"? Is it some kind of pseudo-religious thing, being a follower of the Secret Truth with the possibility of being a prophet of it?
0
Reply
Male 296
I agree, it`s definitely for dummies.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
"The FBI tracked..."
Source please. I REALLY want see it.

"it`s already cost the owner more money "
How much did it cost?
0
Reply
Male 5,626
I prefer to look at conspiracy theory plagued events with as much objectivity as I can. You will (read) me saying: "The particular slip is suspicious. >>It is not an admission.<<"

That having been said, there were a few too many coincidences around the sequence to ignore. It seems to me that the official explanations were riddled with more "guess at explanations that fit" than "collect accounts and sort events by time."

Transversely, there is a lot of conclusion jumping which is what makes a theorist look most incredulous. A conspiracy of this sort would have taken the cooperation of a large amount of military/federal personnel. Too many for none of them to come running out screaming "Soylent Green is made of people!" or some such thing.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
vv Crakr, thank you sir. Occam`s Razor is a powerful concept, and has it`s criticisms, but basically it boils down to applying absolutely fundamental common sense.

If it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, then chances are it`s a f*cking duck.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
CodeJockey: The terrorists confessed to it, The FBI tracked the funding down straight from Bin Laden.

Sorry, But there was no conspiracy. It wasn`t insurance fraud either because it`s already cost the owner more money then he`s received in insurance payments.

Please take off the tin foil hats and join the land of the rational guys.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
CodeJockey, et tu, Brutus?

Seriously, has the world lost it`s f*cking mind? It`s all a conspiracy?

F*ck it, it`s a boring link, 20 minutes long. Watch it if you want, I don`t care anymore. From TED. The Pattern of Self-Deception
0
Reply
Male 5,626
"...and some people even admitted that the US gave the orders to blow it..."
Source please.

While being interviewed, Larry Silverstein slipped, saying "we pulled the building" while trying to say "we pulled out the building."

The particular slip is suspicious. It is not an admission.
0
Reply
Male 5,626
"...Also, debris was found outside of the pentagon..."
There was a news crew that film live from across the freeway less than 9 minutes after that event. They showed the hole with thick, black smoke billowing out. I did not see any plane parts outside of the building.
I`m willing to believe that the debris came from inside the building, after the event.

They also did not they shoot any knocked over posts which is not to say that there weren`t any but, on a whole, the scene as shown two days later looked different than the 9 minute footage.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Okay, I-A-B, O don`t mind it when you post complete bullpoo if it`s funny. So tell me, how is this bullpoo funny?
0
Reply
Male 5,626
CrakrJak, anyone saying that he planned or directed a thing has not observed him as a person. He is a follower, not a leader.
He is not the sort to build a precise plan but, choses to latch onto and exploit the ideas of others.

I don`t think the WTC was a government plan in the least. I think it was
an insurance job
which did need help, be it through compliance, confusion or incompetence but, everything else seemed a little too tacked on.

My questions on that are:
-Who decided the training mission would be that day? Obviously, that person`s office had a leak.
-Why were there so many WTC evacuation drills if no one suspected an attack?
-How does a guy that has trouble with a prop plane do a 360 in jet with no slide? When a plane banks, it tends to lose altitude unless trimmed but, he didn`t lose any. Why did he 360?
0
Reply
Male 12,138
5Cats, man! Look, I have my usual debating opponents here on the site, on all matters political, scientific, religious, even fundamentally philosophical... I`m thinking people like yourself, CrakrJak, AuburnJunky, AnarchistGod, OldOllie, and others. Yet I actually honestly fully respect each and every one of you as intelligent human beings (even when you`re all wrong). I genuinely enjoy the discussions and debates, no malice meant here, in fact the site would be worse place without you guys around. But don`t go spoiling all that now by telling me you`re a tin-foil-toting Truther!

Dude, like they said in the movie Tropic Thunder: "Never go FULL retard!"

;-)
0
Reply
Male 351
@5Cats: Except that camera only filmed at 1 FPS. How does it defy physics? I mean the central mass of the plane formed a mass which then went flaming through the building almost like a projectile because of the speed of the impact. Also, debris was found outside of the pentagon. I`m glad I watched the history channel debunk this BS.
0
Reply
Male 4
Let`s be serious here. Conspiracy theorists grasp at the smallest straws. It is disrespectful to the over 3000 people and their families to call this a conspiracy. The north and south towers didn`t collapse due to fire, THEY WERE HIT BY MASSIVE PLANES. WTC #7 was right beside two 100+ story towers that collapsed, I wonder if that effected the structural integrity of the building??

And just because the Pentagon didn`t have the airplane cutout you morons were expecting doesn`t mean it didn`t hit the building
0
Reply
Male 315
This is ridiculous.
What the hell is wrong with IAB when they start posting outright lies and propog-

Oh right, it`s a comedy website so it doesn`t really matter...
0
Reply
Male 317
What gets me is that on the morning of 9/11, NORAD was running a drill on what would happen if a hijacked plan hit a building. In fact, there is recording of a pilot saying "Is this real life" after being told to scramble to NYC.

Also, on the same say as the London subway bombings in July `05, they were running an exercise on what to do if bombs went off.

Weird.....

0
Reply
Male 40,772
"Both can`t be true at the same time."

But CJ! The left is REQUIRED to believe 7 impossible things... before breakfast! lolz!

Now, someone explain the Pentagon to me please. Which the 9/11 `truth` comission completely avoided, and the official explaination defies ALL logic and laws of physics.

Less believeable than the "magic bullet" eh?

There are at least 3 (three) films of the event, two of which have never been released to the public. The one which was `released` twice, is still missing the key frames which would show the aircraft. Suspicious? Hell yes.

The talk of the towers and building 7 is just a distraction to avoid the subject the government really has no answer to, namely the Pentagon attack.
CoinTelPro is alive and well.
0
Reply
Male 17,511
davymid: I agree. These moonbats were calling GW Bush both a witless moron and an evil genius. Both can`t be true at the same time.
0
Reply
Male 1,252
Any American that thinks it wasn`t a conspiracy/staged event either suffers from blind stupidity/national pride or has no clue whatsoever that their country runs a quasi-public banking system. As well every middle class american just got thrown to the wolves because of the bailouts, now BP is forcing further government spending ... the US is the vampire squid of the planet sucking the juice out of every financial opportunity on the planet. They treat you middle class americans like filthy rats, and you welcome it. retards.
0
Reply
Male 66
@Evilcupcake
that Popular mechanics article is straight disinformation. they also talk about those petty "conspiracy`s," like the one plane had no windows? quite frankly i dont care about the plane that didnt have windows. do you think they were trying to make the "thruthers" look bad? or making them look like "nut jobs?" try looking at the whole picture.
0
Reply
Male 30
operation northwoods is real. if that could be conceived by the government and go as high up as it did in the government why do you all doubt the possibility of 9/11 being conceived and carried out by the government?
0
Reply
Male 188
If skyscrapers are so tough that plane crashes and fire can`t bring them down, then why do people have additional support structures and safety precautions while they`re being made. The damn things are bomb-proof apparently, so there`s no chance that they`ll go down on top of a construction worker, right?
0
Reply
Male 12,138
You know the final proof that 9-11 was not orchestrated by the Bush Administration? Because it worked.
0
Reply
Female 275
Thank you, EvilCupcake for posting what I was going to post.

Logic, people. I know that intrigue and mystery and conspiracy makes you feel in-the-know, but there are so many other *actual* conspiracies that deserve attention. 911 Truth is a waste of time. It`s an act of masturbation.
0
Reply
Female 2,289
"Why do you Americans feel insulted when someone places your government into a doubtful position."

umm... i dont currently know any Americans that wouldn`t agree with you.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
I can`t even find the website they`re referencing.
0
Reply
Male 81
ok for all the 9-11 conspiracy people out there..

9-11 Myths


its a link to an article popular mechanics did a few years back debunking the top 10 9-11 conspiracy`s
0
Reply
Male 2,748
the last fact Blew.My.Mind.
0
Reply
Male 716
You see, I don`t listen to one-sided arguments.

These people make some good points, but they sound like wackjobs.
0
Reply
Male 1,162
yeah, the trick with conspiracy theories is that, the people who believe them dont check their facts. They don`t properly research any bit of information. They take quotes, snippets, anything that fits their `suspicions` and run with it.

Always be skeptical. Always second guess when you don`t really know the facts.
0
Reply
Male 92
Yeah, I`ve also heard that they did it to boost the weapons industry. Which makes sense that we`d put ourselves trillions in debt for the weapons industry.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]BUT CRAZY IS CRAZY. I think the world would be a lot more interesting if it really was conspiracies and schemes, but it really isn`t, not for the most part. The world, and its leaders, are pretty boring.[/quote]

An excellent summary. Reality is not as interesting as fiction. Spy novels, video games, films, conspiracy theories...they all make up more gripping stuff precisely because reality generally isn`t.

People with power may sometimes get together in private clubs to make discreet arrangements to help each other, but that`s not a secret organisation for ruling the world. It`s just the eilte maintaining their position.

Governments may use things to increase their power, but that doesn`t mean they caused those things.

Reality is more mundane than fiction.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]I am one who feels there is something fishy going on with the attacks of 9/11 based on what I have seen. There should be no reason the twin towers fell.[/quote]

Huh? They were hit by very large objects travelling at very high speeds and carrying very large amounts of material so flammable it`s explosive (aviation fuel). The buildings were also full of flammable things.

[quote]They fell like they were blown up,[/quote]

No they didn`t. Not even close.

[quote]and then tower #7 fell which had no damage to it[/quote]

Apart from the drating big hole, the other holes, the multiple impacts and the fires.

[quote]and some people even admited that the US gave the orders to blow it.[/quote]

Some people admit they`re the reincarnation of Elvis. Doesn`t mean it`s true.
0
Reply
Male 1,625
We can speculate all we want, but the fact of the matter is we`ll never know. Consipracy or not.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]You guys can reject these facts all you want.[/quote]

What facts?

Sheesh, I`m 4000 miles away and I can see what a steaming blivet this conspiracy theory is.

A USA government mounts a massive attack on the USA in peacetime using alien technology(*)...and nobody notices? The conspiracy holds? Not a chance. Even if they were vile enough to do it, they wouldn`t get away with it.

* Yes, alien technology. The claims made by the conspiracy theorists are impossible with human technology, so they must require alien technology.
0
Reply
Female 137
@mst4k I stand corrected. Touché sir. Touché.

@EdiMesic I could care less how my government is portrayed. I don`t think the pride of a people should be personified by the quality of it`s leaders. To say I have an control over what the people that run this bitch do is ridiculous.

BUT CRAZY IS CRAZY. I think the world would be a lot more interesting if it really was conspiracies and schemes, but it really isn`t, not for the most part. The world, and its leaders, are pretty boring.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
When are conspiracy theorists going to realise that their lies about building 7 are now so well known that repeating those lies results in an immediate dismissal of everything they say?

I mean...what do you expect to happen to a building hit by hundreds of tonnes of debris that rip a multi-storey hole in it?

You`re arguing that the *only* thing that can damage a building is a plane. Which is a monumentally stupid argument. Anyone who uses it is a liar or a fool. Or perhaps both.
0
Reply
Male 8,300
I think they got the idea of 9/11 from the American Pilot who did it in 1945 anyway.
0
Reply
Male 999
the past is the past
0
Reply
Male 1,135
Just give it up already...
0
Reply
Male 592
As much as you realize that there ARE people out there that would HARM YOU for their INTEREST, so too you should realize that `THOSE` kinds of people are also working in high-places. And will do just the same.
0
Reply
Male 592
Why do you Americans feel insulted when someone places your government into a doubtful position.

Do you really think they care about you and your family/friends that suffer because of their goals (whatever those may be?)

It`s not the first time in history that a country inflicts self-destruction and creates suffering in their country by their doing, just so they could `gain` something out of it.

Bush would have -NEVER- received a consensus from the American people if 9/11 didn`t happen.

After 9/11, America was shocked, dispaired and blinded by rage.

Which, ultimately, lead to hatred towards a group of people that could not have been responsible for the act of terrorism.

The government is not your best friend. It never has been, nor will it ever will be.

As much as you realize that there ARE people out there that would HARM YOU for their INTEREST, so too you should realize that `THOSE` kinds of people are also working in h
0
Reply
Female 141
It`s this kind of thing that makes me wonder why they keep saying "never forget 9/11." We`re in no danger of forgetting it. How the f uck can we be? Nobody will shut up about it!
0
Reply
Female 149
Well, I guess I should go get a hat and some tinfoil now...
0
Reply
Male 2,422
If they went through all this trouble why didn`t they just plant WMDs in Iraq instead of making themselves look like complete tools when there were none to be found? IDK it just seems like Al Qaeda gained a lot more from 9/11 (asymetrical provocation, read Mao) than the government ever would have. Besides the government sucks at conspiracies. Remember Iran-Contra or the Pentagon Papers? Seriously, there is nothing the media in this country loves more than making the government look bad.
0
Reply
Male 383
@xtreme dude
Yum :3
0
Reply
Male 47
You guys can reject these facts all you want. The difference is: these facts have sources, sources that include FBI, Department of Defense, CNN, CBS, AP, MSNBC and SEC. I open to the idea that it might not have been our government that planned it, but they are definitely withholding all the truth of that day. you can`t deny that all these suspicious facts can just be overlooked as hokum.
0
Reply
Male 1,370
I WILL EAT THE TRUTH.
0
Reply
Male 197
These `truther` fu#ktardz are about the dumbest m.f.ers on the planet. They obviously WANT it to be a conspiracy and will cherry-pick anything that looks even remotely suspicious. Wish it was a conspiracy so the evil gov`t would round up these idiots and gas them.
0
Reply
Male 740
is IAB really drating serious right now?
0
Reply
Male 197
These `truther` fu#ktardz are about the dumbest m.f.ers on the planet. They obviously WANT
0
Reply
Male 25,416
wow, i knew IABers wouldnt just be quiet about all this
0
Reply
Male 2,440
0
Reply
Male 290
A lot has been said and written, and I`m sure if you look hard enough, more `suspicious` things can be found.
The basic question is this:
Could something like this be pulled off as a conspiracy?
Maybe. Stranger things have happened.
All things being equal, the only piece of footage that I`ve seen that sticks out as a sore thumb that something isn`t right is the collapse of building 7. So I wouldn`t be surprised if within my lifetime some document surfaces that indicates internal involvement.
In any case, RIP to those who lost their lives that day, as whether it was friend or foe, these people lost their lives for no good reason.
May their families prosper with as little pain as possible.
0
Reply
Male 66
@zombiebish
"You forgot the part about the government all sitting in a big evil board room stroking white cats and laughing maniacally."

i found this on Wikipedia.
"The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are people of influence in the fields of politics, banking, business, the military and media. Each conference is closed to the public and the press."
0
Reply
Male 1,357
"on september 11th, 3 did" No, 2 of them didn`t fall down because of fire.. they collapsed on account of being one-timed by boeing 747s or what ever they were. And i guess the other was from debris
0
Reply
Female 137
You forgot the part about the government all sitting in a big evil board room stroking white cats and laughing maniacally.

The truth is out there...no right there, just past this steaming pile of fantasy produced by brilliant minds with too little to do.
0
Reply
Male 447
Uh, ok. First off, a put option is not a bet that a stock will fall and loose tremendous value. That would be a short sell. And just saying a put option was "placed" doesn`t even clarify if it was bought or sold. So if I sold a put option, for example, I would want the stock to rise. Also, puts and calls are often used in other more complex financial deals that have little to do with the underlying asset. Also, causation does not imply correlation.

TL;DR, this is an oversimplification of wrongly interpreted facts worded in a way to sound more intelligent that in actually is. Also, drat you retarded morons who believe this poo.
0
Reply
Male 378
All "factual" arguments aside, the best and best worded argument for the troofers being wrong comes from Maddox. Read "there is no 911 conspiracy you morons" at www.thebestpageintheuniverse.com.
0
Reply
Female 40
YAY for conspiracy theories! WHOOOOOOHHOOOOOO
0
Reply
Male 1,184
TheNine:

Osama bin Laden is wanted by the FBI to PROVE or DISPROVE whether he was involved, NOT because he was involved. I don`t know whether he was or not, and neither does the FBI.

I have found no indication that steel existed in the Sight and Sound Theater...which is not to say there wasn`t any, I just don`t see proof that there was.

The Kader Toy factory was NOT steel-framed, it was steel-reinforced.

The ESP Toilet Paper Factory contained steel, but was not steel-framed; also, the walls did not collapse, only the roof collapsed.
0
Reply
Male 66
@Baelzar
is folding up money your augment? petty.
0
Reply
Male 1,929
If these are the best arguements there are then it`s probably not a conspiracy
0
Reply
Male 7,378
@ CrakrJak, No of course not. But don`t hold a "Truth commission" and leave out half the truth. That makes it a Lie Commission. Everything he testified to is on his webpage. I`ve heard him interviewed on a local radio station. Dude has a compelling story that makes sense and gives credence to some of the truthers suspicions. A demolition crew wiring the building to blow without anyone noticing is absurd but an explosive device planted before the attack makes sense from an al queda tactical perspective.
0
Reply
Male 1,399
0
Reply
Female 40
Conspiracy nuts what next, a 10 foot tall Bigfoot in North Carolina with beautiful hair? ... oh wait.
0
Reply
Male 3,819
There are 10 people in the world who know the truth for sure and none of them have accounts on I-A-B and none of them are the people who do freelance research on the subject. Dismissing it with conviction is close-minded and preaching a conspiracy with certainty is too open-minded. People need to start thinking for themselves and embrace all possibilities.
0
Reply
Male 3,819
"So what was your reason for showing that picture, then?"

Just to show that there`s strong evidence on the other side of the argument.

"Ah, this again. The distrust of experts.

I don`t take their word as gold because they claim they are experts. I take their word as gold because they have spent their lives dedicated to the subject, and I haven`t."

Then why do you ignore the people who dedicated their lives to the subject who believe it was an inside job? This isn`t the distrust of experts. It`s the fact that with something like this you`re going to have experts on both sides of the argument and people listen to the ones they want to based on personal bias. I don`t insult anybody with greater knowledge than me, instead I refuse to just nod my head and agree just because they do. Once again, I`m not on either side of this argument so I don`t understand why I`m getting sucked into one.
0
Reply
Male 66
"MST i stopped reading when you compared the United States to Nazi Germany."
never compaired nazi germany to united states.
just used it as a example to give you the idea of the type of tyranny that can go on.
and i dont smoke weed and this is not my job.
0
Reply
Male 66
@dang007
"The fact was that WTC was the ONLY steel frame building that has collapsed due to fire. The FACT is FALSE"
i never said that wtc7 was the only building brought down by fire. BUT those factory`s and theaters are in a totally in a different category. thats all im saying.
0
Reply
Male 975
MST i stopped reading when you compared the United States to Nazi Germany.
You sound like someone going nowhere in life, you`ve got a pooty job, your two hobbies are weed and music, maybe you get into trouble, and you take no responsibility for you`re own actions so you blame authorities instead.
Good luck with your conspiracy theory, one day the lizard men controlling Earth will reveal themselves and you can be their right hand human accomplice.

0
Reply
Male 663
>>ummm these are factory`s and theaters. these are building that have large openings. just because there`s SOME steal in them, the large openings disproves your argument completely..... <<

mst4k:

Are you serious????? The fact was that WTC was the ONLY steel frame building that has collapsed due to fire. The FACT is FALSE. After this is shown to you in black and white you try and change the original fact. Conspiracy nuts have been doing the same dog a pony show for generations.

0
Reply
Male 17,511
madest: Of course the government has secrets and for good reasons. You don`t want every Tom, Dick and Harry knowing our missile launch codes or Barry`s phone number to his blackberry, Do you ?
0
Reply
Male 2,850
Btw CrakrJak, it`s nice to be on the same side as you in a debate for a change. :)
0
Reply
Male 351
@mst4k: Yes, you do need to. You cannot possible call yourself American if you do not know the documents that our government was founded upon. All political knowledge is moot if you do not know the Constitution.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
"ummm these are factory`s and theaters. these are building that have large openings. just because there`s SOME steal in them, the large openings disproves your argument completely....."

If they are steel-framed buildings that collapsed due to fire, then the original statement was wrong.

The original statement would have to be more specific about what type of building it`s referring to if it wanted to be correct.

The original statement just says "steel-framed buildings". It doesn`t say "except for factories, etc".
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@peloos12

"I`m not assuming anything."

So what was your reason for showing that picture, then?

"You just listen to people who claim they`re experts and take their word as gold."

Ah, this again. The distrust of experts.

I don`t take their word as gold because they claim they are experts. I take their word as gold because they have spent their lives dedicated to the subject, and I haven`t.

Question, yes; but don`t insult someone with greater knowledge just because you disagree with them.
0
Reply
Male 66
@TheNineXXX
"WTC 7 was the first, last and only steel framed building to collapse from fire damage? What about the McCormick Center in Chicago, the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania, Kader Toy factory in Thailand, the ESP Toilet Paper Factory in the UK et cetera, et cetera."

ummm these are factory`s and theaters. these are building that have large openings. just because there`s SOME steal in them, the large openings disproves your argument completely.....
0
Reply
Male 3,014
Truths for dummies, indeed. Only dummies would buy into this bullshít.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@mst4k

"there is your problem right there...it is not taken out of context...THESE ARE THE FACTS. bottom line...either wake up or dont"

Yes, they ARE taken out of context; there isn`t any context here at all.

AGAIN I ask; what are the figures for all the OTHER airlines at the same period? Without THOSE facts, you can`t conclude ANYTHING from the facts about those two airlines presented here.
0
Reply
Female 199
more facebook fails, less conspiracy theories
0
Reply
Male 66
@ZNaught
i have, somewhat. but i dont need to, to know that we are moving away from the constitution. i was just wondering your thoughts.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
William Rodriguez held a top security clearance issed by the government so he could hold one of 3 master keys to the WTC. On 9/11 before the planes hit he heard and felt an explosion on the floor beneath where he was. Upon reaching the scene he came upon a blast area and encountered a badly burned individual who he was helping into an ambulance when the first plane hit. I believe him. Not saying any of the items in this list are factual but I know that our government conceals important facts from us.
0
Reply
Male 192
@ CrakrJak how do we know some of those pics are not staged lol kidding realy i am except for the wreckage one my uncle worke in the pentagon and i saw a pic just after it happened then the e-mail "got lost" ironic isnt it
0
Reply
Male 395
Failed at the first hurdle!

Osama bin laden IS wanted by the FBI for the events of Sept 11, 2001. Source: FBI

The Second part is mostly true but is used in an attempt to poison the well, rather than look at the evidence fairly and honestly.

WTC 7 was the first, last and only steel framed building to collapse from fire damage? What about the McCormick Center in Chicago, the Sight and Sound Theater in Pennsylvania, Kader Toy factory in Thailand, the ESP Toilet Paper Factory in the UK et cetera, et cetera.

This seems to be an advert for a website that doesn`t even exist anymore - I wonder if the lizard people in DA GUBBERMANT shut them down!?!??

;)
0
Reply
Male 351
@mst4k: If you would simply read it, and then look at our current laws and how government operates, I wouldn`t need to do so. Every American should know this. Instead of making your life easy, go and read it yourself and actually learn how the government should be.
0
Reply
Male 66
@ZNaught
why dont you elaborate?
0
Reply
Male 17,511
I`ll post this link again, Because it seems there are still idiots out there that might believe this nonsense - Top 10 Photos Truthers Hate
0
Reply
Male 351
@mst4k: Read the Constitution. Need I say more?
0
Reply
Male 66
@ZNaught
how is it corrupt??
0
Reply
Male 192
@ bak5102 i put in the site and it said "page not found" lol thats funny but seriously conspiricy theries will always be around and as far as 9/11 goes only a few people in this world know the truth and i am not one of them Do i believe the government ... no way in hell but i will say this former Gov jessie ventura hosted the show conspiricy theory and funny the show went off the air when he invewstigated the 9/11 story and my personal fav pare of that episode was when he asked i believe a CIA leader about if 9/11 was a black op ( the US gov. behind it so we could attack) the guy said he could not "conferm or deny it"
0
Reply
Male 351
@mst4k: Of course it is corrupt. Could the government have done 9/11 if they wanted to? I suppose so, but evidence shows that they DID NOT.

@deeplick: NIST - 9/11 investigation
0
Reply
Male 66
@Luniz82
no comment. :P
0
Reply
Male 587
Where did you get that info? mst4k... That is Classified buddy. We have a team headed to your house do not move. Do not post any further comments or download any files.
0
Reply
Male 234
I am one who feels there is something fishy going on with the attacks of 9/11 based on what I have seen. There should be no reason the twin towers fell. They fell like they were blown up, and then tower #7 fell which had no damage to it and some people even admited that the US gave the orders to blow it.

The government has screwed us like this before. Look at peral harbor. There is cold hard proof that our government knew exactly when and where that attack was going to happen. But they decided to let it happen to us as a excuse to get into the war. This was a secret that was kept till only a few years ago when the paper work was released on it.

Thats not the first, nor last pooty thing our government did to us. Not to mention like the infographic says the US government has planned something like this before, among many other nasty things.
0
Reply
Male 66
NORAD, in the first time in its history, was told to stand down directly from Cheney.
Fighter&#65279; Jet Launch procedure was changed a few months before so that only Rumsfeld could order an intercept.
"Hijackers listed on their DLs and place of residence as being at AFBs such as Lackland and Maxwell AFB`s Air War College, learning explosives techniques, strategy and tactics.
Molten steel which was found up to Jan to Feb 2002, more then what jet fuel was capable of."
0
Reply
Male 40,772
They didn`t even mention the Pentagon... now THAT`s an obvious cover-up.
0
Reply
Male 84
Obvious Moron is Obvious ly retarded if they believe this
0
Reply
Male 4
@ bak5102: have you read what he is wanted for? Because 9/11 is not on that list. It took me less than 2 minutes to actually read it.
0
Reply
Male 8
Blah
0
Reply
Male 587
I agree the people who believe this is an inside job disregard the evidence that proves otherwise and use unreliable sources for their "facts". All I have seen is all circumstantial. Oh look at the way that beam broke it must be an inside job or look the windows broke that proves its and inside job. You can get any number of conclusions from the facts they use. The conclusion that the government did it is just the one these people jumped behind. Suddenly we are all detectives because of information we heard of read somewhere.
0
Reply
Male 32
There is nothing factual about this list.

Example -
FBI - Bin Laden wanted
0
Reply
Male 3,819
"And this proves what, exactly? That you can make uneducated assumptions?"

I`m not assuming anything. There are more pictures like that out there. If you had read my comment, you`d realize that all I`m saying is that`s what everybody on both sides of this fence is doing -- making uneducated assumptions. You just listen to people who claim they`re experts and take their word as gold. Selective hearing. If you want to believe it was a set up, you listen to the guy with the scientific evidence that supports it. If you refuse to believe it was a set up, you do the opposite.

Fact of the matter is that nobody knows for sure and that more than likely *most* people who weigh in on the subject have no actual knowledge of the things they`re spewing. It`s all just a bunch of mindless parroting.

It`s the same as arguing religion, philosophy, psychology, sociology, etc. We`ll never know the truth. It`s a dead horse.
0
Reply
Female 130
Absolutely horrifying. Going with just a simple drop shadow for a graphic title in this day and age? what was he thinking?!?
0
Reply
Male 1,547
*facepalm*
1. The FBI doesn`t have jurisdiction in foreign countries except in special circumstances such as felons running into Mexico. For foreign criminals, we have the CIA.

2. Operation Northwoods was not rejected by Kennedy, it was rejected by the DoD as soon as it was proposed. It was nothing but a scenario by a military think tank.

3. The Windsor Building in Madrid was a steel framed building that collapsed due to fire in 2005.

4. There were several legitimate reasons for put options on the airlines. American Airlines had just drafted merger plans with Delta, for example.

5. As a result of our history of flight in this country, many airports have a military base, or at least military presence. Hijackers would train at an airport.

6. So, a relative of someone in power received contracts for important buildings. Mild cronyism, yes; conspiracy, no. Stratesec holds so many contracts, it would be a wonder if they weren`t at those build
0
Reply
Male 66
@ZNaught
okay...if 9/11 wasn`t a inside job, is the government corrupt in a very very bad way?
check mate you sarcastic nut job :P
0
Reply
Male 8
and man never landed on the moon and Elvis is still alive...

People like to hear things they agree with. That`s the reason why crazy conservative people watch FoxNews (and believe it is the gospel truth), and liberal people watch CNN. This website provides fodder for the crazy liberal people who hate/hated Bush.

Will we ever know exactly what happened on 9/11, probably not. it doesn`t do anyone any good to subscribe to these conspiracy theories. They make you nuts.
0
Reply
Male 1,141
It`s "fun" and "scary" to believe in conspiracy theories. Life would be too boring without them. It would of course be much too difficult to actually question your government AND resist from creating outlandish theories. I`m extremely skeptical of the US government and constantly criticize and question them, yet I see no reason to create illogical scenarios. After seeing the Truther`s reaction to the team on Discovery Channel from Purdue who made high tech scientific computer models and tests of the towers collapsing, I`m not convinced. They had NO good rebuttals and simply just dismissed the data without any fair observations. Now I`m not making the claim that they`re nuts, but they just embarrass themselves with their amateurish approach to the science of the whole thing. That`s my thoughts on the matter.
0
Reply
Male 351
@mst4k: Yea, I mean after 9 years where no one has come out of the supposedly needed thousands that would be involved in such a master plot. It will happen soon right? It must, right?

I am just a sarcasm nut today.

@peloos12: Steel I beams are never constructed using joints, right? I mean aren`t buildings constructed of one solid piece of steel?

0
Reply
Male 28
@peloos12- Btw those steel beams were cut with plasma-cutter torches after the building fell during the clean-up.
This is like the picture of the polar bear on the small piece of ice and falsely saying the global warming is causing polar bears to scramble about for land. Even though the polar bear population has made a large resurgence in the last decade.It`s all about context brochacho.
0
Reply
Male 2,034
FACT: Bears eat beets.
0
Reply
Male 66
@Musuko42
there is your problem right there...it is not taken out of context...THESE ARE THE FACTS. bottom line...either wake up or dont
0
Reply
Male 196
If you have a bias for thinking that there is secret knowledge only a few have, and the majority of the world is simply ignorant, and the government is a vast, powerful, competent machine capable of orchestrating a cover-up on such a massive scale... well then, you`re an idiot.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@peloos12

You have one blurry picture of a sheered steel beam?

And this proves what, exactly? That you can make uneducated assumptions?
0
Reply
Male 66
@jayme21
ya i agree with that but aren`t there people who were go along with the propaganda?....my point is people get deceived all the time, were just doing it better in the 21st century. on top of it, they know we are dumb. hey i am on this site aren`t i?
0
Reply
Male 7,378
The big mystery to me about 9/11 is why was William Rodriguez`s testimony left out of the 9/11 commissions report? He had a top secret security clearance to hold the master key needed to help the firemen. Seems unseemly that such a strong witness would be the only testimony taken in secret and then not included in the report. So everything on that list is true. Our government lies to us every day.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
"do people just not care that these are actually facts?"

They may well be facts; but often without context, even true facts can be used to mislead.

For example, you could say that a particular chemical triples your risk of getting a disease, and you can make people panic at this huge health risk.

But not mentioning that the tripling in question is from a 0.0000000001% chance to a 0.0000000003% means that the totally true fact is still misleading because it`s taken out of context.

In this case, I mentioned earlier about the facts about the speculators betting against those two airlines; without knowing what the speculators did with the other airlines at the same time, or any other company at the time, the facts in isolation can mean anything...and therefore they mean nothing at all.
0
Reply
Male 684
@mst4k Germany the Nazi`s and WW2 Many germans did know what was going on. Like in communist Russia people know whats going. Why was nothing done as long as you didnt you remained safe. Genral populace wont speak out against injustice if it affects their safety.

other countries knew what was happening. USA UK and all other countries knew what was happening One of the problems was we left it be rather then get involved. GB had to wait and sign the munich agreement to militarise our country so we could stand up and hold out to Germany (US had no excuse :P) After WW1 countries weren`t in a position to stand up and fight so remained quiet.
0
Reply
Female 3,562
All of these "facts" can easily be explained just by using more than half of your brain.
Like the idea that somehow a 3rd building fell doesn`t make sense? Gee, you think 2 buildings twice as tall as the third collapsing right on top of it wouldn`t affect that building? You think your house would survive if two 100 story buildings collapsed right on top of it?
And simply because these terrorists were close to the government doesn`t mean they were controlled by them. Millions of people are in or close to the government, they aren`t all terrorists.
0
Reply
Male 14
First, last, and only steel building in history to collapse from fire alone? Has everyone forgotten about the Kader Toy Factory fire in 1993, which was after all, a steel building that collapsed from fire alone?
0
Reply
Male 774
Btw, if someone wants a debunking of popular conspiracy theories here`s a link
0
Reply
Male 66
@shaboinkin
i dont know...it really is up to us...how history plays its self out. i cant really look into the future...
0
Reply
Male 10,855
Note to "truthers" (if we can call you that):
THIS IS NOT HARD EVIDENCE!!!

We should start calling them the "9/11 Liars/Decievers"
0
Reply
Male 684
Fact of the matter is a few whack jobs in a cave in Afghanistan committed an atrocity. Scared how out of control we are in our lives to outside forces you feel compelled to believe that an all powerful controller is looking after you or deciding which of you will die. Truth is it`s not but you cant accept it.

And for Gov. Conspiracy how much trouble to companies and Gov. have at keeping secrets. How much trouble to large companies and the Gov. have running the country or their corporations on a whole. The obvious thing is something like this would involve too many people it can be kept secret.
So your all wrong it could only be one group it must have been those Jew`s you heard not a single one of them turned upto work that day True we have soucres XD Any Truthers disagree with me now who`s being ignorant...
0
Reply
Male 456
@mst4k
"it WIll one day come out it WAS a inside job"

And what happens when it turns out it wasn`t an inside job?
0
Reply
Male 774
I take anything mainstream media says with a grain of salt, although other sources have backed up CNN so that`s the exception.

I wish this person would give record numbers and the like instead of just giving us a broad name. Do they know how many records the SEC has alone?
0
Reply
Male 3,819
I`m not on either side of this argument, but that`s the thing. I think both sides make an excellent case.

"Add fire to this and you have melting steel."

I never realized melting steel was so simple.



Looks to me like there might have been some help.

Look, I know it`s a ridiculous idea. That`s why I have a hard time saying "ZOMG IT WAS A SETUP" but the evidence out there is pretty damn solid. I`ll never know the truth, no, but ruling it out is just way more idiotic to me than how some people paint believing it to be.
0
Reply
Male 66
people ask why this trash is up on IBA? its because the people on IBA know its a inside job and know that he government is corrupt. wake up u drating idiots!!
0
Reply
Male 684
Thing that bugs me about "Truthers" is when confronted with scientific evidence by independant sources you disregard it and think you know better watching grainy videos then experts who have studied for years.

An example, Popular mechanics explained how the buildings collapsed with the heat not breaking the beams but allowing it to bend slightly (airplaine fuel burns at a great heat) With the bending the weight of buildings allowed the support to buckle and one floor dropped onto another once again adding more weight onto the support below that. This also caused the famous depth charges argument in which you see the charges blowing out windows before the floor collapses.. well as one floor dropped onto another is compressed the air. this caused windows to smahs under pressure as it escaped.

When the "Truthers" were explained this the reply was "why do popular mechanics have any authority or right to say that"
0
Reply
Male 66
do people just not care that these are actually facts?? reading these comments just make me sick to think how many ignorant people are out there. do u not realize that the government is corrupt to the core??....dont u realize stuff like this does happen in government?? look at nazi germany...for anyone who says that truthers are idiots, or my dad was there, that was stressful enough, or comparing it to big foot or something, u just havent done your research and quite frankly, you just dont care. yeah, it happened 9 years ago but it WIll one day come out it WAS a inside job and when that day will come and you ignorant people still wont care. it is then that you`ll realize how evil you really are.
0
Reply
Male 1,958

0
Reply
Male 587
Funny how all the facts still come from Media outlets and the outlets that do not like republicans at that. That is like taking the stuff fox and glenn beck (and his crazy followers)about Obama and saying it is fact when anyone with a brain can see there is another agenda behind what is being said. Same with these "america took out the towers people" they don`t like government and will do and say what they can to make it lose credibility. There for unreliable.
0
Reply
Male 678
Agreed, msieg007.
0
Reply
Male 587
People put the "facts" that make them look right out, they do not bother with the facts that proves them wrong that is why you only see the conspiracy theory here. People who actually believe that America did this to it`s self are just looking for things to label America evil for. These are the people that should move to Canada with the rest of the crazies and leave America for the real Americans.
0
Reply
Female 448
Okay. Physics lesson kiddos! (And partially architecture). You have a building that is especially tall, you need more support beams to hold it up.See the beams inbetween the windows? They aren`t there to look all pretty. They are there to help support the building--along with the granite wall. Now, say you have a fast moving, kinda big force moving perpendicular to the support beams. At that rate of speed, the beams would bend/break, causing the structure to lose stability. Add fire to this and you have melting steel. Suddenly you have one floor just collapse and disappear. This sudden increase in weight causes the next floor to collapse. And the next floor. And the next. And the next until all you are left with is a bunch of rubble.

Mystery solved. Get a life.
0
Reply
Male 2,700
"Truthers = Still drating idiots."

Also another sound that comes from the user that posted this....."Baaa!!"
0
Reply
Male 378
Wow, are we really still talking about this?
0
Reply
Male 140
No conspiracy from the government.

It was what you saw on TV.
0
Reply
Male 548
this is stupid.
0
Reply
Male 185
It`s hilarious how many of you think that doubting the official story allows you to lump these people in with tinfoil hats, UFO sightings, mole people, chem trails, kool-aide drinkers, and so on.

Just goes to show how reactionary people are and how little critical thinking there is in our culture. Go about your daily lives everyone, nothing to see here.
0
Reply
Male 2,850
@bomberouno

VCP24 is automatically not right for saying "wake up people".

One wonders if she was going to say "sheeple" before changing her mind at the last minute.

Such phrases are generally used by people who think they know the Secret Truth, and feel smart because they believe everyone else is too stupid to "get" it.
0
Reply
Male 394
Truthers = Still drating idiots.
0
Reply
Male 734
I realize that sometimes IAB has political or religious posts. I accept that. But this? Why is this trash on here? This belongs on CSTDT, not IAB.
0
Reply
Male 185
I just love how people react to this kind of information.

VCP24 is right, and no, just because something contradicts your views doesn`t mean it is a crazy conspiracy.
0
Reply
Male 240
I don`t buy into the conspiracy theory. If two people know a secret, that`s one too many. However, the "Operation Northwoods" project is actually true. I wrote a paper on it my senior year in college. It was the brainchild of General Lenitzer. The plan was quickly dismissed by both McNamara and Kennedy.
0
Reply
Male 2,034
9/11 conspiracy theorists irritate me almost as much as "Paul McCartney is dead" conspiracy theorists.
0
Reply
Male 39,955
people want to believe big tragedies have big beginnings. Things should balance like Holocause & Nazi party

so one man taking out JFK doesn`t balance and it`s a conspiracy

or one 3rd world hut dweller plans 911 doesn`t balance either.....

but that`s life people. it doesn`t always balance
0
Reply
Male 2,850
Just face it; people want to believe that there`s a "master plan" controlling everything. It gives a sense of order to confusing chaos.

It`s what makes people believe in religion, and it`s what makes people believe in conspiracies.

Because people want to believe that someone or something is in control, even if they are a non-existent god or a conspiracy that wants to harm them, rather than accept the simple truth:

That sometimes s**t just happens.

So just stop, think, and consider the very likely possibility that NOBODY is in control. There is no puppeteer pulling the strings of the world, manipulating it to some grand plan.

All we have is a chaos of random and non-random events, all slushed in together, and any attempt to see overall patterns is likely only our own fear of the uncontrolled, and our primal instinct to see links and patterns, cause and effect, giving us false-positives.
0
Reply
Male 975
I hate conspiracy theories on this topic. My dad was in the city that day it was stressful enough to deal with that, now I see people from across the world offering their perspective on something that happened 9 years ago.
0
Reply
Male 296
I love how all these people are using the argument, "George W. Bush is too stupid to plan this durhh LOL" but anyone who thinks this is stupid themselves. Yes, the President is the top-man in the whitehouse, but there`s a reason that there are thousands of people below him, thinking up plans and saying "Hey, George, we want to (insert government conspiracy here), but we need your approval. How`s it sound?" He says go for it, and that`s all it takes. The government is not run by the president.
0
Reply
Male 1,108
Anyone need one of these?


0
Reply
Male 663
>>>Fact #2 on this image was one of the reasons Kennedy was assassinated. He new he had the power to say no to the "powers that be" and he used it often. So they threw together a plot to get him out of their way and replaced with someone who`d let them do what they wanted. There are goings on in Washington that the average people don`t know about. Secret dealings, blood pacts, terror plots, secret government meetings... all designed to keep the government in absolute power. And no, not the President... The REAL people who run the show. <<<

That`s right lets debunk one crazy theory with another.
0
Reply
Male 351
@VCP24: Watch a little too much Alex Jones do ya? Yea, even he is a little too radical for me.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
vv VCP24`s right- IT`S THE LIZARD PEOPLE HURR DURR!
0
Reply
Male 351
@zmeace:

1. Yea, I mean we went to war with Iraq for the same reason we invaded Afghanistan, right?

2. Just like how Dick Cheney used his former company to make bad shut off valves for the BP oil rig right? Specifically because he didn`t think 9/11 was enough, right?

3. None of those weapons were shipped off to other countries, right? Bush himself gathered all the intelligence regarding WMDs firsthand right?
0
Reply
Female 42
I feel sorry for the people who don`t believe there is some truth to this list. I feel even more sorry for people who think GW Bush was behind the attacks or even incharge of the US during his 2 terms. Hell, Obama isn`t even incharge of the US. There are people out there who most of us have never heard of (or care to) that are running the world. Wake up everybody!!
0
Reply
Male 2,850
Full of holes:

What are the figures on the put options on all the OTHER airlines? If others had high levels of put options, then other factors are likely at play.

So without that additional information, there`s nothing that can be assumed from the snippet of information revealed here.

Not enough information is worse than no information at all.

Similarly, about the steel-framed buildings collapsed by fire; they were collapsed by fire fueled by aviation fuel (Towers 1+2) and large amounts of stored generator diesel (tower 7), as well as massive impacts by planes (towers 1+2), and massive impacts by falling debris from nearby collapsing buildings (tower 7).

These "facts" are the worst kind of misinformation; not outright lies, but distortions and dissembling by ommission.

It`s pathetic.
0
Reply
Male 351
@unlk: durr hurr, because steel maintains its structural integrity up until it actually melts right? right?
0
Reply
Male 1,021
So the president who couldn`t even spit out a coherent sentence masterminded a complex comspiracy that killed thousands of Americans. I guess Barnum was right about suckers being born every day.
0
Reply
Male 2,688
The_phantom... The WTC was consisted of MULTIPLE BUILDINGS, not just 2... If I remember correctly, after the fallout, only ONE building remained standing after it all... The main two were hit by planes and went down in fire, the third went down in fire after the first did. The rest were small and got destroyed by the falling rubble from the two main towers.

Fact #2 on this image was one of the reasons Kennedy was assassinated. He new he had the power to say no to the "powers that be" and he used it often. So they threw together a plot to get him out of their way and replaced with someone who`d let them do what they wanted. There are goings on in Washington that the average people don`t know about. Secret dealings, blood pacts, terror plots, secret government meetings... all designed to keep the government in absolute power. And no, not the President... The REAL people who run the show.
0
Reply
Female 4,039
Bush has a brother named Wirt?
0
Reply
Male 516
[Insert wild theory]
Source: FBI

It must be true because it is credited by a trusted source. Not directly, but it mentions them, so they must have said it. Why would the person who made this picture lie?
0
Reply
Male 806
i truly believe that bush may have had some part in it, i know that 9/11 wasnt caused by the government in whole and mostly al qaeda but its hard to pick a side of which one.

1. bush wanted revenge for his saddam attacking his dad and with the middle east bombing us, it was an act of war and he had a reason to go to war with the middle east he could have gone with saudi arabia, iraq, iran, afghanistan. at the time all americans knew was that it was the middle eastern country that attacked us

2. oil, he needed a reason to be able to go there and send troops for oil and take it by force if needed so

3. scapegoat, weapons of mass destruction, of course as we all already know he knew that there were none there, just because 9/11 happened it was another reason to send angry pissed off citizens over there

now, this could have happened at any time during any 9/11 year but it happened during bush`s presidency

coincidence,possible i dont know
0
Reply
Female 9,572
Having an aunt and uncle who saw the whole thing, I can prove it wrong...
0
Reply
Female 248
Sorry kiddies, but truth is boring.
0
Reply
Female 248
Yeah I`m sure all this is true.
0
Reply
Male 6,693
There is always some wierdo out there.
0
Reply
Male 233
@the_phantom its talking about a third building( WTC building 7) on the WTC complex which is(was) made up of more buildings than just the twin towers. and NEVER a steel building collapsed due fire, also if you see the video of building 7 collapsing it falls down just like any other building under controlled demolition
0
Reply
Male 4,745
Funny how you`ll fight tooth and nail to ignore facts.
0
Reply
Female 3,574
@keg74 lol
0
Reply
Male 510
i know this is bullpoo because the one about the third building falling due to fire is wrong. BOTH BUILDINGS WERE HIT BY PLANES. LITERALLY EVERYONE SAW IT HAPPEN. and even if there was a thrid building there that got caught on fire (thats reasonable i guess), it entirely forgot about the FOURTH building attacked on 9/11, the pentagon building. and that was also hit by a plane.
0
Reply
Male 7,378
I knew it was Bush`s fault. If Osama bin Laden wasn`t behind it, lets pack up and GTFO of Afghanistan.
0
Reply
Male 410
"What you have to understand Neo, is that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged, and some of them are so hopelessly dependent on the system they will fight to protect it"
0
Reply
Male 1,011
Really? REALLY?

DAMN THIS IS STUPID!

Look at the age of the one who posted this BS..13-17? What 13-17 year olds know how to use their god damn brains? NONE OF THEM!

This is simple...our government is too stupid to pull off something as complex (and sadly genius) attacks ..especially on its own soil. (same with people who think the moon landing was faked)

Think about it this way...most of these "truthers" hate GWB..thinking hes stupid, but they also think hes involved..

Which is it? Your favorite punching bag is either;
A) an evil genius
b) an idiot who couldn`t possibly be involved.

YOU CANT HAVE BOTH PEOPLE.
0
Reply
Male 45
if you believe this your a moron.
0
Reply
Male 39,955
You want Proof there was no conspiracy?

Okay, here it is . . .

George Bush was not smart enough to pull off his socks, let alone a conspiracy this size.
0
Reply
Male 2
And that`s why America is stupid
0
Reply
Male 630
Most of these facts are slanted, or completely made up. Thank you internet, for your profound wisdom.
0
Reply
Male 590
haha, osama bin laden is NOT wanted for etc... however he is the FBIs #1 most wanted man...
0
Reply
Female 3,574
oh gawd
0
Reply
Male 1,931
I honestly do not know either way. Some may call me a drating idiot for not making a firm stance against a set up, but I honestly don`t know. I don`t know what all George Bush did. I don`t know how close the bin Laden family is with the Bush family. I don`t know any of it. So I keep an open mind for both possibilities.
0
Reply
Male 1,265
Meh... even if it was a government conspiracy it`s not like there is much people can do about it. Though some of these things do look pretty convincing, it`d be nice to actually see the evidence rather than just being told it. Like the living in the houses thing and the financial put options sound like proof but it could just be interpretation of evidence.

@DragonMeta, I could take credit doesn`t mean I did it.
0
Reply
Male 15,510
God bless America
0
Reply
Male 833
i dont get how the fact that they have no hard evidence that bin laden was involved somehow adds to the conspiracy theory. you arent likely to find any hard evidence incriminating anyone that wasnt directly involved in the crime, this goes for ANY crime.
0
Reply
Female 1,515
This makes me think that conspiracy theorists are stupid, and that`s about it. While I am firmly against the war, and would have no problems thinking the worst of George W. Bush, these sort of conspiracy things always piss me off.
0
Reply
Male 1
When will this be allowed to die?
0
Reply
Male 1,764
I thought we were over this...
There was no 9/11 conspiracy you morons.
0
Reply
Male 233
everyone should watch the zeitgeist documentaries it covers all of these and more....
0
Reply
Male 12,138
Oh no, not this crap again!
0
Reply
Male 749
Wait!, I`ve been to the WTC more than once before 9/11, I`ve flown on both United and American airlines, I`ve been to Dulles & Logan airports, and I drove past the Pentagon once....Holly crap, I think I may be responsible for 9/11!!!!
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Whatever. Dumbasses.
0
Reply
Male 187
internet flame war in 5...4...3...2...
0
Reply
Male 44
I thought Bin Laden took credit for 911? Isnt that admission of guilt?
0
Reply
Male 575
I don`t know; I still find it hard to believe that it was a set-up.
0
Reply
Male 39,955
did any of that minutia really change your mind about anything?
0
Reply
Male 4,593
Stupid.
0
Reply
Male 62
Link: 9/11 Truths For Dummies [Pic] [Rate Link] - Yeesh, this one makes you think a bit...
0
Reply