Recent Britney Spears Photos: Before & After [Pic]

Submitted by: fancylad 7 years ago in Misc

Hey ladies, don"t feel so bad when you see a Britney Spears looking perfect--this raw "before" photo tells us otherwise.
There are 98 comments:
Female 1
photoshop is soo faaake. I ALSO prefer the first pic, only because it looks more realistic, considering her life.
0
Reply
Female 59
i dont like her, she tries to make the public feel guilty and sorry for her...¬¬

0
Reply
Female 74
Not only is she a dancer, but she`s a mommy. I preferred the first image.
0
Reply
Female 1,593
but but...i like camel toe, crinkley ankle, rounded calves....also compare how healthy her left leg looks in the before pic than the aenimic one on the right...

---

I believe you mean anorexic. Anemia is low iron in the blood.
0
Reply
Male 554
She is sofaking Skanky!
0
Reply
Male 31
Guys come on, given all the poo she had gone on in her life (though she caused most of it). She looks great for her age and stress.
0
Reply
Male 985
And theeeeres the camel toe
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Spocom "Bruises? From what?"

You really should learn to read ALL the posts before you comment.
0
Reply
Female 115
i see what they did to that cameltoe
0
Reply
Male 495
Id hit that.
0
Reply
Female 488
are those liverspots on her legs? bleuch...
0
Reply
Female 570
she looks fine, except the bruises of course
0
Reply
Male 894
you can usually tell if a model`s photo is shopped or airbrushed cuz their skin is just too damn bright looking. zig!*fail*
0
Reply
Male 21
Man that left leg is a disaster
0
Reply
Male 698
ha
0
Reply
Male 105
PLUS: Uglier background....
0
Reply
Female 77
Good for her
0
Reply
Male 454
Moose knuckle.......LMFAO! I`ve heard camel toe, obviously, but that`s new to me. Ha!
0
Reply
Female 654
moose knuckle
0
Reply
Male 88
They got rid of the camel toe too...
0
Reply
Male 868
So she`s fake. This is news?
0
Reply
Male 197
I have this strange urge to smoke a pack of Camels
0
Reply
Female 4,039
She looks pretty good to me - coulda got the same effect with a pair of pantyhose.
0
Reply
Male 2,893
Of course she isn`t that perfect in real life.
It`s scientifically proven that if you are photographed and then placed in a vat of cotton candy, you get hotter. (physically)
0
Reply
Female 708
Bruises? From what?
0
Reply
Male 4,014
BTW - this chick in the ads here for consumertipsdigest.org is smoking hot, and it makes me laugh that they put her in a "newsroom" but dress her like a teenager, and don`t even bother to do her hair. Awesome.
0
Reply
Male 4,014
"All of that, and she`s still fail."

She makes more money ($730,000) in a month from residuals doing NOTHING from now until forever than you will make in a year of hard work. She can literally sit on her ass for a straight month and make 3/4 of a million dollars. If thats "fail," I want to fail too.
0
Reply
Male 4,807
what happened to her camel toe?
0
Reply
Male 4,012
Apart from removing the bruises (and maybe the camel toe), she really didn`t need to be photoshopped. Looks human, at the very least.
0
Reply
Male 756
They forgot to highlight the camel toe removal.
0
Reply
Female 420
She wasn`t exactly a massive fat knacker before was she? Good on her for the idea though?
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Not a bad picture to begin with i would say!
0
Reply
Male 877
but but...i like camel toe, crinkley ankle, rounded calves....also compare how healthy her left leg looks in the before pic than the aenimic one on the right...
0
Reply
Female 13
is it just me, or did they make her foot slimmer as well?
0
Reply
Male 478
lol @ MrsHoneyDew - took the words right out of my mouth!
0
Reply
Female 255
She honestly was not that bad in the before pic...props to the girl even though I hate her.
0
Reply
Male 734
All of that, and she`s still fail.
0
Reply
Female 322
the only thing they really needed to fix was the bruises
0
Reply
Female 387
Camel toe removed )-|
0
Reply
Female 152
she has some wide feet that`s for sure
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Those bruises are thumb prints.
0
Reply
Female 1,190
whats the problem with the first? i can see why they might touch up the skin tone just for aesthetic reasons but other than that props to her for getting back in shape
0
Reply
Male 3,755
For some reason, they thought she also didn`t need knees.
0
Reply
Male 289
AClckwrkJake is right, they totally cleared her camel toe.
0
Reply
Female 1,652
Um. yeah. Even I don`t look like that before pic, and I haven`t even shaved my head or threw umbrellas at people.
0
Reply
Female 10
Looks roughly the same to me.
0
Reply
Male 2,592
I`d be more than happy with either
0
Reply
Female 956
You know what? Good for her.

She looks fabulous either way.
0
Reply
Male 6
also note the edited out camel toe
0
Reply
Male 1,404
The fine folks a Disney Corp. need Ms. Spears to maintain as long as possible that 14 year old "Look I can still play dress up just like you!" for all of her pre-teen fans.
0
Reply
Female 9,572
Those are some ugly legs.
0
Reply
Male 1,351
I will say that I think she looks better in the after(and don`t all of you give me that bs saying that I`m shallow, the *intention* was to make the second better, and most of you are just following the bandwagon and all saying the first was better), but all things considered the before isn`t bad either.
0
Reply
Female 1,264
Why do they do this? She looks really good in the before pic.
0
Reply
Female 149
Hahahahahahahahaha they removed her camel toe hahahaha
0
Reply
Male 9,305
In this day and age, it isn`t "Who`s your surgeon?" it`s "Who`s your photoshop specialist?"
0
Reply
Female 1,682
You know, all things considered, what she gone through, she isn`t TOO bad looking. Definitely not the ugliest girl ever...
0
Reply
Male 4,867
she didnt exactly look bad in the before
0
Reply
Male 103
Why has no one yelled shopped on the first photo yet? Seems fairly obvious to me, and I`m certainly no expert.
0
Reply
Female 547
She looks great in the "before" photos... but yeah, the cameltoe had to go.
0
Reply
Male 272
i bet even the first pic is shopped and she allowed it to "leak" to show how little they had to retouch her and make it seem more credible.
0
Reply
Female 1,604
I don`t like her, but she looked fine before, your average woman, and I think hips look better curvy.. I can see touching up her right leg because of the bruises, but other than that there was no reason to touch her up
0
Reply
Female 172
she is still pretty hot. i`d do her either way... and i am straight and i woman.

girl is just a foxx
0
Reply
Male 3,369
Damn! Got beat on the camel toe!
0
Reply
Female 1,515
Seeing how not much was really changed...yeah this doesn`t help a girl`s self image :P
0
Reply
Male 2,700
HA....they forgot to highlight the "Cameltoe removal"
0
Reply
Male 46
although it wasn`t noted on the picture, if you look, you`ll see that they also removed her camel toe haha!
0
Reply
Female 1,677
The raw photo tells us she isn`t perfect, so we shouldn`t feel bad? What the hell does that even mean?

Plus she`s gorgeous in both anyway- photoshop only touches her up, it doesn`t make her pretty, she already is.
0
Reply
Male 394
@fiizok

I think we all do.....
0
Reply
Female 999
Took balls to put this out like that. I like it.
0
Reply
Female 696
Why did they make her body smaller? It didnt need to be at all. She`s naturally small...
0
Reply
Male 1,083
the only thing wrong in the first pic were the bruises. she still looked good everywhere else.
0
Reply
Male 4,014
Plus, her face is just beautiful, note they didn`t touch that at all.
0
Reply
Male 4,014
I`d still nail the hell out of her
0
Reply
Male 591
I liked her better when she went completely nuts and shaved her head.
0
Reply
Male 2,220
Before for me too.
0
Reply
Male 2,121
She`s fitter in the before pic...
0
Reply
Male 81
They removed her cameltoe.
0
Reply
Female 3,828
why airbrush the tattoo, ikeray? the point of a tattoo is so people can see it.

actually her before pic isnt bad at all. usually they airbrush waaay more than this.

plus im used to seeing her NOT photoshopped anyway- way more pics of her in the tabloids and on the news than photoshoot ones.
0
Reply
Male 497
shes a human yknow
0
Reply
Male 1,505
Hey, anyone see a mooseknuckle around here? Britney lost one.
0
Reply
Female 525
cameltoe airbrushed too..
0
Reply
Female 854
Why did they make her pale. She has a nice tan in the Before pics.
0
Reply
Male 1,219
That`s it? It`s not like she`s ugly in the first pic.
0
Reply
Female 1,043
pit hair was brushed out, too.
0
Reply
Male 11,739
The before photos don`t show ALL of her imperfections. That`s barely scratching the surface.
0
Reply
Male 231
Yupp...sportin toe like never before
0
Reply
Male 2,703
why not airbrush the tattoo?
0
Reply
Male 1,451
As the caption says, she ALLOWED them to be released. I say bravo, and she looks fine either way.
0
Reply
Female 205
well i think she isnt so bad in her "before" photo, but i really dont care so much for her anyway.
0
Reply
Female 10
Um, they forgot to point out what else got removed in the airbrushing. Camel toe anyone?
0
Reply
Male 208
before looks hotter.
0
Reply
Male 1,378
No one wants to see this
0
Reply
Male 1,135
camel toe... but nasty
0
Reply
Male 57
why was the camel toe removed?
0
Reply
Female 3,574
Really, not as bad as I`ve seen before.
0
Reply
Male 1,237
bye bye camel toe
0
Reply
Male 10,338
I`d still hit it `till she`s not crazy anymore.
0
Reply
Male 20,901
Link: Recent Britney Spears Photos: Before & After [Pic] [Rate Link] - Hey ladies, don`t feel so bad when you see a Britney Spears looking perfect--this raw `before` photo tells us otherwise.
0
Reply