Lane Bryant Lingerie Commercial Censored Yesterday

Submitted by: fancylad 7 years ago in

Watch it for yourself. It"s the ad Fox and ABC Didn"t want their viewers to see. Offensive? OK? I-A-B, make the call.
There are 185 comments:
Female 467
this girl in the video is not fat
shes about 9 stone or less.
thats pretty thin to me.
0
Reply
Male 4,807
I`m offended, I wanted to see more skin!
0
Reply
Female 12
it`s like Dove`s natural beauty but with a victoria`s secret twist....
0
Reply
Male 24
Ha! Ha! Saw one while eating your donuts! That`s hilarious! LMFAO
0
Reply
Male 82
@ Angilion
I see lingerie ads all the time before 9 pm...what are you talking about?...I just saw one while eating my donuts.
0
Reply
Female 1
I have worked in the entertainment industry most of my life, i have worked with models of all types & honestly i shun who ever has a problem with her. The real victoria`s secret models are REALLY ugly in person they dont look how they do in tv or with out make up. they spend hours in make up & hair, just for that look. plus size models already look good people dont always want to spend much on them yet for a size 0 they go all out. i have much respect for REAL women like her & I, the reason she was shunned was because she was REAL not fake sorry but america is FAT look at the reality everything is fast serve & ready to go what people dont know is where its from & the effects.. but im not getting into that.. i want to find this models name & say Let me take you out to a fun walk & then dinner..
0
Reply
Female 547
My husband had one reply, "Hot."
0
Reply
Male 12,365
[quote]I fail to see how this is worse than any other lingerie commercial...[/quote]

It`s no worse than other lingerie commercials that also weren`t allowed to be aired before 9 p.m.

It wasn`t treated any differently to other lingerie commercials that also focused on the breasts of a beautiful woman.

Great publicity for the bra company, though. Which is why I think they did it deliberately, knowing full well that it would be treated the same way as other similar commercials, i.e. only allowed after 9 p.m.
0
Reply
Male 4,680
I fail to see how this is worse than any other lingerie commercial...
0
Reply
Female 151
I don`t care who you are or what size clothes you wear, it`s amazing that body size effects the way our media runs things.

I`m a skinny girl, I was told I probably won`t ever have to worry about being overweight. And yet i completely agree that being bony and skinny should NEVER be a standard for ANYONE. Curvy girls are beautiful IF they are comfortable in their own skin, as are skinny girls. I`m constantly offended by this "skinny girls are a bag of bones" trash as much as the curvy girls are offended by the non-use of a slightly voluptuous girl in VS ads and fashion. Forget about it, you may be missing out on getting to know a good person.
0
Reply
Male 3,915
she sure was fine...
0
Reply
Female 130
"in actuality, women feel better by seeing the thin models then beautiful plus sized women. Seems backwards but if u think about it then it makes sense because they dont see themselves as beautiful when being heavy but when they see people who are beautiful and on the heavy side then i can see where they get upset. "
And yet there was a fashion magazine that did a size issue not to long ago where they showed a typical model and a more voluptuous model in the same outfit and pose to show you dont always need the hyper skinny models to fully show off the clothes. The point? There were a lot of people who initially didnt see a difference between the two people.
0
Reply
Female 470
Funny thing is, while she`s hot, majority of the women who shop in Lane Bryant are between a size 18-22. How do I know this? I shop there, and those are typically the sizes that are sold out. Hmmm...
0
Reply
Male 82
woah shes hot
0
Reply
Female 1,324
Nuclear

idk where you`re getting this from >> but every girl I know feels worse seeing a pretty skinny girl.
0
Reply
Female 21
i love her. why do we like skinny people? someone remind me.
0
Reply
Male 660
mmmMMMmmm bewbs!......
0
Reply
Male 293
I---want---her---NOW!!!
0
Reply
Female 258
in actuality, women feel better by seeing the thin models then beautiful plus sized women. Seems backwards but if u think about it then it makes sense because they dont see themselves as beautiful when being heavy but when they see people who are beautiful and on the heavy side then i can see where they get upset.

and yes, i am size zero. i do not starve myself, i eat healthy and i have never been fat in my life. being size zero doesn`t mean im anorexic and a freak it just means im healthy
0
Reply
Female 509
@bomb-tom: WTF and no.
0
Reply
Male 87
finally a model worth looking at, not just skin and bones! yuck. I don`t get the american attitude against commercials like this *scratches head* guess I`m not meant to understand.
0
Reply
Female 451
What? She`s going out in her bra? I don`t get it.

@bomb_tom- anorexia and/or bulimia is not healthy.
0
Reply
Female 446
i`d be lesbian for her.
0
Reply
Male 522
don`t insult victoria secret models by calling them skeletons and implying that its such a horrible thing being size 0. unlike this chick, VS models are disciplined - they eat healthy, sacrifice, exercise, and generally take care of their themselves. as a result, their hard work is rewarded by having amazing bodies.

you think its empowering seeing people like you, who are on the heavy side, in lingerie ads? you should strive to be better - that`s what you should take away from VS ads. that`s the problem with ads like this. they say "its ok to be a few pounds overweight, unlike those skinny VS sluts". and that`s close to what so many of you have already said.

and don`t forget, being fat already embodies 2 of the 7 deadly sins, glutonny and sloth. REPENT!
0
Reply
Male 418
smokin hot, awsome tits...cant think articulate thoughts, must fap
0
Reply
Male 14,331
If you think this girl is fat and ugly you`ve got some serious issues. I think she`s hot.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
I see that someone did bother to find out what actually happened - Oystah.

So it was just a timing issue. The ad was considered too sexual to be shown before 9pm, the bra company wanted it shown before then.

Maybe the bra company was clever enough to deliberately break the advertising restrictions that they knew the TV company applied to everyone, in order to generate a vast amount of victim-power and publicity. Like the suffragette policy of assaulting policemen in order to get arrested for the same purpose, but less extreme.
0
Reply
Male 155
Very beautiful. Wish more commercials were like this.
0
Reply
Male 690
I am offended. She wasn`t naked!
0
Reply
Male 119
"@andromeda33 it probably does mean he is superficial but it also probably means your a fat cow too!"

logical fallacy.
0
Reply
Female 236
what was wrong with that? Except the fact that she was 273.864.872.634 times more beautiful than most models..
0
Reply
Male 190
mmmm baby`s got back.....
that was hot
0
Reply
Female 190
I really didn`t understand what the problem was `til I read the comments... Are we really THAT obsessed with a woman`s body shape.
I`m from the UK and we have non-skinny women in adverts - yes, inc. underwear ads - all the time. I don`t understand the big deal.
0
Reply
Male 1,106
That`s no worse than the Victoria Secret`s commercials.
0
Reply
Male 22
@andromeda33 it probably does mean he is superficial but it also probably means your a fat cow too!
0
Reply
Male 22
good add dont see the reason for censoring that!

although i wouldnt stick it in that fattie! urgh i think shed try to eat my knob off instead of her `late night` twinkie stuffed under the pillow

0
Reply
Male 1,148
Am I missing something here... she`s FAT!?!?
0
Reply
Female 4,039
This is just PR touchdown - Lane Bryant wanted this spot aired between 8 and 9 p.m. and bought the time during American Idol for it. The network only allows commercials like this and Victoria Secret to air after 9 and they told them they couldn`t buy the spot `cuz it had to come on after nine. Lane Bryant got their thong in a tangle and took the haters against fat chicks route. It had nothing to do with plus size anything. It`s just a media frenzy hype crazy fat bashing thing.
0
Reply
Female 143
I would love to have that body. She is tall, curvy, and confident. That`s beautiful.
0
Reply
Female 50
@bomb_tom ads promoting unhealthy lifestyles should be banned from TV, like smoking, being fat, etc...

these do not promote being fat, its promoting loving yourself for who you are. Just because not all women are a size 0, doesn`t mean we need to have absolutely no sex appeal. Seeing a commercial like that makes me feel empowered. I am glad to see that in the discussion you`re probably one of the only men here to actualy think that this is a bad thing. It means that you`re the only superficial one here.
0
Reply
Female 48
I like the commercial, it`s not racier than the Victoria Secret commercials. Actually I think they are sexier because they represent more of the women I see everyday.
0
Reply
Female 16
Thank you TV Execs for perpetuating the myth that only thin women are beautiful. Bet those execs are crusty old pot-bellied men that cheat on their wives with barely legal-aged women...Larry King style. God knows, broadcasting sex scandals are WAY less offensive than this Lane Bryant ad (wish there were a sarcasm font to type that with).
0
Reply
Male 203
taste in women aside, what is offensive about this?
0
Reply
Female 428
These women are not `fat` in any way, shape or form. Larger than what most consider model material, but I do not see flabby swinging bellies overlapping the underpants or anything. People are so skewed to think that any amount of flesh beyond the bare minimum to cover your skeleton and internal organs = fat.
0
Reply
Male 2,159
This is the pre-censored one? Holy crap, what`s the big deal?! It`s not exactly like that Calvin Klein one where you could see Eva Mendes` nipples, is it? How extremely sensitive some people/companies are.
0
Reply
Male 269
full bodied, healthy. Totally hot
0
Reply
Female 185
"ads promoting unhealthy lifestyles should be banned from TV, like smoking, being fat, etc..."

She is not fat. And do you think that walking around looking like Skeletor is healthy? No. It`s not. It`s gross.
0
Reply
Male 2,332
Is it offensive against mothers? Who knows.

Nice to see a woman with a little meat on her bones for a change though. :)
0
Reply
Female 185
"she was perhaps a lingerie model about 40lbs ago..."

Lane Bryant specializes in clothes for thick women, and besides that she is absolutely beautiful and not fat at all. Believe it or not, most men prefer not to have a skeleton wrapped in skin.
0
Reply
Male 3,619
not a bad looking pluss size model =O
0
Reply
Male 149
that chick has a way better rack than the zombies from victorias secret. keep her on tv.
0
Reply
Male 226
Ok, where`s the offensive part?

I even showed that to my wife, who found it a little naughty, but far tamer than half the shows on during the day now.

On a side note, I`d like to take that model home and and make her scream at the ceiling for a few hours...
0
Reply
Male 32
What was so bad about that?
0
Reply
Male 19
she was perhaps a lingerie model about 40lbs ago...
0
Reply
Male 2,220
0
Reply
Male 63
Hell-o curves! Yum...
0
Reply
Male 452
Not offensive.... But pretty lame (apart from lingerie model, that is).
0
Reply
Female 131
so not offensive. this is what all lingerie commercials should look like.
0
Reply
Male 4,290
I had to watch it over and over, just to make sure I wasn`t offended.
0
Reply
Male 959
anyone know the model`s name? I feel like ogling
0
Reply
Male 2,220
Gorgeous.

Good work from the ad company, both in content and playing the censorship angle...
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Awesome. Not offensive.
0
Reply
Female 8,001
Why? how could that be offensive- I have seen more suggestive ads for soft drinks?
0
Reply
Male 3,369
She`s amazing looking! I can`t understand why ABC censored this, but is anybody surprised that a conservative station would censor an ad with a woman that isn`t "model" skinny?
0
Reply
Female 19
How is this offensive? I don`t see anyone banning Victoria`s Secret commercials.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
Has anyone bothered to find out what reason the people who censored the ad gave for censoring it?
0
Reply
Female 168
Not offensive.
0
Reply
Male 522
ads promoting unhealthy lifestyles should be banned from TV, like smoking, being fat, etc...
0
Reply
Female 50
I think its totally unfair for networks to ban this commercial. if they want to censor commercials about lingerie for larger women than they must do so with small women. As a larger woman, I find it offensive that the impression that`s being given off is my body cannot be appreciated like a thin woman`s should be.
0
Reply
Female 535
Uhh, I don`t get it. It`s offensive because...? How is it any different to anything else on TV?
0
Reply
Female 282
I see nothing offensive...
0
Reply
Male 3,755
I had to watch that commercial about 10 times to find something offensive. Something offensive finally showed up, but it had nothing to do with the commercial.
0
Reply
Male 976
It`s funny ABC would ban this when they have such sex-laden shows like "Grey`s Anatomy", "Desperate Housewives", etc. Way to be hypocrites, ABC!
0
Reply
Female 4,376
um...okay. So this gets banned but the beer commercial with the 2 size 2 chicks in skin tight suits playing spin the bottle about to make out is completely cool?

Yeah. Makes sense.
0
Reply
Male 1,195
... I don`t get it...
0
Reply
Male 3,631
Forget plus size this and my girlfriend would hit that - you guys are barking up the wrong tree.

Maybe they didn`t want to promote the idea that this is how a woman should approach her average lunch-date (the implication being that this `Dan` must be somebody she wants to get in bed with - and that`s how she`s chosen to go about it). Maybe they felt it `debases` women by suggesting that this one`s only chance at impressing her suitor would be through a reduction to blatant sex-appeal.
0
Reply
Male 245
How the hell is that offensive? Damn America`s Puritan history. In Europe they`d see this and be like "...why didn`t they just show her boobs?"
0
Reply
Male 7,817
whats the difference between this and a victorias secret comercial?
0
Reply
Male 74
How is this more acceptable than Vicky`s Secret models? The shot where they show her stomach isn`t even the same girl. Why? Because even the girl in the ad doesn`t have the body she is supposed to be promoting.

my prediction to why networks didn`t want to show it: It gives men the impression fat girls will throw themselves at you if you ask them out to lunch.
0
Reply
Male 36
Nom Nom Nom!
0
Reply
Female 126
Typical attitude though. Apparently its only ok to be running around in your undies if you`re 5`10" and 100 lbs with silicone under the bra.
0
Reply
Female 126
I`m a woman and I`d hit that. She`s gorgeous.
0
Reply
Female 152
Hot.....How is this different than any other lingerie commercial?...only these ladies are fine like wine
0
Reply
Male 22
I only read the first few comments, but does anyone realize that they pulled the commercial only because the woman isn`t skinny?
0
Reply
Female 735
hmmmm. sexy lady. i wonder what size her boobs are... im DD now, so... let me compare. *thinks*
0
Reply
Female 223
She is delicious *_*
0
Reply
Male 1,039
I think she`s absolutely hot. My wife is 5`1" and 98 lbs. However, I wouldn`t turn this woman down in the least bit if I had a chance to date her. She looks healthy, curvy, and sexy as ****.
0
Reply
Male 3,058
Interesting...

My girlfriend just told me that SHE would do the chick in the commercial...

...I TOTALLY love this woman.
0
Reply
Male 1,351
I fail to see the offensiveness. It`s TV, come on you prudish networks!
0
Reply
Female 222
Is she a prostitute? Is it because she went out in her undies?

...or is it because she`s a Layne Bryant model!?
0
Reply
Female 188
pomunium, you`re right, rail-thin is real too (as long as someone was naturally born that way, and is healthy), but the fact is, that is ALL we see in the media. Just rail-thin women.

We`re not against these women, we`re against the media for putting only them in ads because not everyone looks like them. Hell, even these women don`t look like themselves thanks to photoshop.

This lack of variety is causing serious problems in North America, because it gives people an unattainable body image to strive for, and is causing much body dissatisfaction amongst youth-especially female youth.

</rant>
0
Reply
Male 10,440
O_O. Boobs!! I am loving this ad.

Screw fox. I don`t get why you people are so up in arms over them censoring this... Its dumbasses acting like dumbasses. So what?
0
Reply
Male 367
She was actually wearing more clothes than some of the things I`ve seen on TV. Body paint does not count as clothes, amirite?
0
Reply
Male 5,189
Ahh thats not so bad.
0
Reply
Female 77
Why`s everybody so against the skinny girls now? That doesn`t seem fair. Rail-thin is real, too.
0
Reply
Female 1,401
not at all offensive
0
Reply
Female 188
What...the hell? Why was that not shown??! God forbid we have more real looking women on television. Oh no, that would be absurd!

Seriously, like FeelTheRide said, what the hell is the difference between this, and other lingerie commercials they show on TV 24/7??! Besides the fact that the gorgeous model actually had meat on her bones for a change?
0
Reply
Male 258
McRib is back???
0
Reply
Male 3,431
Daymn, She is 100% FINE AS HELL!
0
Reply
Male 2,549
They censored it;

- because they thought that women were impressionable enough to start walking around outside in their undergarments??

- because female flesh should never be exposed?

- because she`s about to meet a love interest?

_ because we`ve never seen stuff like that in commercials before??

Pfffft, give me a break!
0
Reply
Female 336
"not sure i may have to watch this oh five or six more times before i can decide"

I lol`ed. WIN!!!
0
Reply
Female 515
she is gorgeous!! No different than Victoria`s Secret ads that we are inundated with everyday; she`s just not rail thin.
She`s absolutely beautiful!
0
Reply
Female 50
i personally think there need to be more things on tv like this. i wish more "plus size" companies would show that you can be "bigger" and still sexy. its been said a million times, but its not fair that all women have to look at in the media are stick skinny girls, and that we should all strive to look like that. i think that in today`s society, bigger women with more curves are finally beginning to be seen as sexy, and thats great. thank you lane bryant, for showing the world that you don`t have to wear a size 2 to be beautiful.
0
Reply
Male 1,590
"I don`t see what`s offensive about it..."

She`s not an anorexic bleach blond, most likely.
0
Reply
Male 1,629
not sure i may have to watch this oh five or six more times before i can decide
0
Reply
Female 838
I personally think she is f***ing gorgeous! I don`t find this offensive at all.

I think what the man was censoring was the fact that she was leaving to her "friend`s" place in nothing but an overcoat and lingerie. See what the problem is, is that its ok for a guy to be in a hot tub full of bikini clad women but it is definitely not ok for a women to be looking for a piece of action!
0
Reply
Male 25
H O T
0
Reply
Male 299
I don`t see what`s offensive about it...
0
Reply
Male 25,417
no problem with that
0
Reply
Male 100
Shes drating hot, PERIOD, way hotter than some skinny little twig would be.
0
Reply
Female 275
Why was this censored? I don`t understand what`s offensive about it.
0
Reply
Male 210
Sexier than bones. =]
0
Reply
Male 105
What an insanely delicious piece of woman that is..
and theres nothing offending about the ad, and if it was i would like her to offend me all day long :) have a nice weekend to elmusatche: its not her thats "large" its all the others that are tiny.
0
Reply
Male 186
Thank god they censored it. NO FATTIES ON TV!!
0
Reply
Female 130
i loved this ad!
0
Reply
Male 1,625
For a larger woman shes really hot.
0
Reply
Male 1,958
Look, let just cut to and say that all the men (except Nido) achieved
0
Reply
Female 247
Not so sure why this was so bad? I`ve seen way worse stuff on the major TV networks than that.
0
Reply
Female 667
That`s not too bad. I`ve seen FAR worse on network television.
0
Reply
Male 40,375
Mmmmm milkshakes!
0
Reply
Male 75
It really was a great lunch, the dessert was excellent...
0
Reply
Male 13
Absolutely beautiful.
0
Reply
Female 21
Word womanfoo. No, not everyone likes "voluptuous" women. But, imo this model (as represented) is pretty close to the perfect female body.

@ Spocom: Gerri Halliwell, seriously?


0
Reply
Female 3,562
Know what`s really funny? At worst these women are a size 12, which is below plus-sized and what Lane Bryant carries. Wouldn`t be suprised if they were size 10s. Victoria Secret models are more like size 0.
0
Reply
Male 98
She looks so much better than the super skinny chicks they usually use. If I wasn`t married...
0
Reply
Male 150
spocom.... I just hope you`re joking.
0
Reply
Female 238
she forgot to put on a dress
0
Reply
Male 272
meh
0
Reply
Male 91
boner
0
Reply
Male 533
Spocom, you`re in the 13-17 age group, so I`ll forgive you for your complete and total lack of knowledge about men.
0
Reply
Male 591
um? wha?
0
Reply
Female 122
Seems okay to me
0
Reply
Male 63
HOT.
0
Reply
Male 38
If these companies also decided not to show Victoria`s Secrets ads then they are being consistent. If they have but didn`t show this then they are doing it because of her size.
0
Reply
Male 180
Eh? What`s the matter with this?
0
Reply
Male 670
kind of a bad ad anyways
0
Reply
Female 276
i dont see hats wrong ith this eiter?
0
Reply
Female 709
Haha all these guys talk about how hot she is even though she isn`t anorexic, but deep down they would still prefer a picture of Geri Halliwell over this girl any day...
0
Reply
Male 1,793
mmmmmmmm... wish I was Dan...
0
Reply
Male 497
i dont get it.
0
Reply
Male 268
dude she was smoking hot I love a women who looks real
0
Reply
Male 955
I fail to see what was wrong with the commercial.

Maybe going out with just underwear and an overcoat?
0
Reply
Male 94
Doesnt look any different to any other lingerie commercial. I dont see what there problem with it was. I was expecting and hoping to see a nipple pop out or something.
0
Reply
Male 2,345
that is a woman...skinny ass models are not sexy...

MEN, when the hell did we start thinking some skinny ass bitch with no tits and no ass or hips was sexy?

come on now, come back to reality and realize that a woman should have curves...they are designed to have them by nature and they look damn great with them!

the woman in that ad is damn near perfect!
0
Reply
Male 1,164
SO she`s going out to lunch wearing nothing but a bra and panties under a jacket?

I think they banned it on sheer stupidity rather than sensuality.
0
Reply
Female 123
I think she looks way more beautiful than any skinny model. Although I`m sure if I was a lesbian I`d do either :3
0
Reply
Male 2,085
hot hot hot
0
Reply
Male 487
i love it, and wish you saw more real women in advertising.
0
Reply
Female 119
It is sad that they censored that, it`s actually a good add, and I`d trust her to recommend underwear to me seeing as how she actually has boobs.
0
Reply
Male 430
She is sexy, that is all there is to it. If the stupid people in charge don`t see that, then that is their loss.
0
Reply
Female 956
Nid... not every woman has breasts.
0
Reply
Female 318
i think they weren`t allowed to show that commercial because she`s not the society`s idea of perfect: size 0.
I think she`s prettier than most other lingerie models out there...i don`t see the big deal...
and I am so buying from there lol XD
0
Reply
Male 2,229
)-| I get how that was racy. Jailbait, blobs and milfs that I`ve seen have gone out with much less and looked a thousand times worse.

And besides that is what a real woman looks like an how. Twiggy type `models` look anorexic sic.
0
Reply
Male 515
I think its the fact that she has a fuller body compared to most models we see out there. I guess it`s kind of associating those models with moms, and in some crazy way calling them -moms- fat.
0
Reply
Male 15,510
"I would be happy if people stopped using the word "drat" or any variation thereof."

They are really writing the "F" word and such. The site just change it for "drat"
0
Reply
Male 451
Oh, and I would take her over any drating Victoria Secret model any day. Love those big naturals!!
0
Reply
Male 265
wow...a commercial that showed off a girl that guys might actually have a chance at picking up.
0
Reply
Male 451
@ lostinkorea: She is fat????? NOT
She is slightly "big boned", but not fat by any means.
@ Sirrix: I know what you drating mean.
0
Reply
Male 9,305
So she has tits, big whoop. Every woman has them.
0
Reply
Female 3,562
Lane Bryant`s bras don`t come in my size. Neither does Victoria`s Secret. I can`t win, really.
0
Reply
Female 3,726
I guess it`s offensive cause she`s fat. I mean I have seen much racier commercials...
0
Reply
Female 1,062
If this had been a Victoria`s Secret commerical with size 2 models, I don`t think it would have been censored.
0
Reply
Male 210
I would be happy if people stopped using the word "drat" or any variation thereof.
0
Reply
Male 1,929
If it wasn`t for the comments I`d have no idea what this was about.
0
Reply
Male 236
"So some ABC and Fox retards only think skinny whores are beautiful? wow so many shallow people in this world that chick was drating sexy."
That`s not the point she walked out with nothing on but a coat and the lingerie.
0
Reply
Female 3,598
wow that woman was SEXY!!! damn... just my type.
0
Reply
Male 3,842
I do not see why this wasn`t aired on television?
0
Reply
Male 483
they`re hot
0
Reply
Male 397
I`ve seen worse. Much MUCH worse.
0
Reply
Female 1,604
Agreeing with your sarcasm overkill I mean come on they have Victoria secret commercials with women wearing just as little.
0
Reply
Female 18
I see no problem, plus that model is gorgeous.
0
Reply
Female 876
I don`t get it... Isn`t it kind of what all lingerie ads are? Except with more talking and less flashing lights and crazy music?
0
Reply
Female 798
and how is this different from any Victoria`s Secret commercial? Not counting the fact that it is a (gorgeous) plus size woman?
0
Reply
Female 204
I don`t understand the controversy here.... Can someone please explain what was wrong with this commercial to me? Because I REALLY don`t get it.
0
Reply
Female 10
a fuller figured woman wearing less than a tent...thats enough reason to censor it! any woman above a size 6 isnt sexy after all c`mon everyone knows that!! jeez fox and abc were just lookin out for all the men by filling this ad space with a more acceptable victorias secret ad with the exact same narration and poses.

-rolls eyes-
0
Reply
Male 31
So some ABC and Fox retards only think skinny whores are beautiful? wow so many shallow people in this world that chick was drating sexy.
0
Reply
Female 646
i didn`t think it was too bad...
0
Reply
Male 509
what`s offensive about that?
0
Reply
Male 15
I am very offended!!! how dare a commercial show a woman in lingerie that is not 5 foot 11 and weight 90 pounds /Sarcasm

No different than any other lingerie commercial, except that the model in this commercial is a better representation for a "more average/typical" woman.
0
Reply
Male 81
damn
0
Reply
Male 57
Dont see what the ploblem is, In Glasgow, Scotland, this is how most girls go out dressed like on a saturday night :)
0
Reply
Female 41
i don`t get it :|
0
Reply
Male 2
Not offended. It didn`t show any more than a Victoria`s Secret ad, and I`m pretty sure that while it was sexy, it wasn`t too sexual. Less raunchy sexy than Victoria`s Secret, but not bad.
0
Reply
Male 44
Nothing wrong with it. The only thing i see that maybe set off the prudes at the station was that her boobs were a little bigger than you see victorias secret models having.
0
Reply
Male 20,829
Link: Lane Bryant Lingerie Commercial Censored Yesterday [Rate Link] - Watch it for yourself. It`s the ad Fox and ABC Didn`t want their viewers to see. Offensive? OK? I-A-B, make the call.
0
Reply