Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 50    Average: 4/5]
62 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 106428
Rating: 4
Category: Funny
Date: 04/16/10 10:05 AM

62 Responses to A Photo Editor Will Be Fired For This [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18499 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:26 am
    Link: A Photo Editor Will Be Fired For This - When you Photoshop a girl for a nood magazine, smooth out her imperfections--sure, but don`t forget the shadows. NSFWish
  2. Profile photo of fabarati
    fabarati Male 18-29
    1240 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:36 am
    HAHAHAHAHA!
  3. Profile photo of NotAllowed
    NotAllowed Female 18-29
    526 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:38 am
    lol..why was she wearing 2 sizes small panties in the first place..?
  4. Profile photo of Fealiks
    Fealiks Male 18-29
    224 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:41 am
    How horrible must it be for models to find out that their imperfections have been photoshopped out D:
  5. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10443 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:42 am
    A little content aware will do you good.
  6. Profile photo of NotAllowed
    NotAllowed Female 18-29
    526 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:43 am
    lol..why was she wearing 2 sizes small panties in the first place..?
  7. Profile photo of Ches47
    Ches47 Male 18-29
    302 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:46 am
    No way. Why the hell would she be a model if she is that huge?
  8. Profile photo of fabarati
    fabarati Male 18-29
    1240 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:48 am
    I`m guessing that`s she`s really not huge. Probably very attractive.

    And that she wore panties two sizes too small so that the photo editors knew how much to take in.
  9. Profile photo of Ches47
    Ches47 Male 18-29
    302 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:50 am
    Interesting point fabarati. She certainly has a pretty face... if that is real!?
  10. Profile photo of coffeekoneko
    coffeekoneko Female 18-29
    1008 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:54 am
    If they got the girl some panties that fit they wouldn`t have this problem.
  11. Profile photo of ggolbez
    ggolbez Male 18-29
    1933 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:55 am
    I would much rather see a model in her natural form, than having it altered to the state of frankenstein.
  12. Profile photo of fabarati
    fabarati Male 18-29
    1240 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:00 am
    Yes, but it`s harder to find a girl that fits in those size pants, yet have breasts that big.
  13. Profile photo of lilsheep
    lilsheep Male 18-29
    225 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:02 am
    nooo but shes so fine!!!!
  14. Profile photo of WeePee
    WeePee Male 18-29
    612 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:03 am
    anyone ever consider that its extremely easy for someone to just edit the shadow to make it look like a bad editing job?
  15. Profile photo of redser99
    redser99 Male 30-39
    114 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:05 am
    Something`s incorrect about the whole shadow such that it`s very dark at bottom and very light at top. The light is clearly shining from top-down, yet the shadow is from bottom-up.

    I think the shadow may be a painting on the backboard.
  16. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2442 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:18 am
    `Dem t*tties :)
  17. Profile photo of kribbe
    kribbe Male 18-29
    2006 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:20 am
    something smells fishy and it is not me, does not photoshop "stretch" pictures? and doesn`t that mean the shadows get "stretched" too?
  18. Profile photo of incubus_inc
    incubus_inc Male 18-29
    976 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:33 am
    Black bar FAAAAAAAAIL
  19. Profile photo of Ruswut
    Ruswut Male 18-29
    1266 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:49 am
    @redser99 You do realise that shoots like this usually (always) have more than just a ceiling lamp?

    And using underwear with looser elastic is cheaper than photoshop to smooth out after, I`m betting on the shadow being the altered bit too.
  20. Profile photo of briirox
    briirox Female 18-29
    179 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 12:24 pm
    Kribbe, They CAN stretch photos, but they don`t always have to do it.
  21. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10722 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 12:28 pm
    whoops
  22. Profile photo of Flibmeister
    Flibmeister Female 18-29
    833 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 12:41 pm
    what ruswut said. from an ex press photo tech.
  23. Profile photo of Angelmassb
    Angelmassb Male 18-29
    15511 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 12:52 pm
    Forgot to shop the shadow?
  24. Profile photo of _kiersten_
    _kiersten_ Female 18-29
    1684 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:04 pm
    ...Shes hawt. In this picture at least. If she had that much fat hanging out I dunno if I would find that very pretty :/
  25. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25407 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:12 pm
    rofl!
  26. Profile photo of Boomsie
    Boomsie Female 18-29
    252 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:18 pm
    Theres more than just one light source here so it is believable.
    even so, she clearly wasn`t that huge in the first place, just a curvy girl. Curvy girls are hot anyway.
  27. Profile photo of Aerophyre
    Aerophyre Male 18-29
    177 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:31 pm
    First and foremost: If the fat that caused the shadow was photoshopped away, the shadow IMMEDIATELY BEHIND said fat would also have been photoshopped out in the process. The only way this could have happened is if they took the fat out, then put the shadow back in.
  28. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14273 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:32 pm
    SCHWING!!!
  29. Profile photo of bigbangbilly
    bigbangbilly Male 13-17
    698 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:36 pm
    ha this is very funny
  30. Profile photo of Avalessa
    Avalessa Female 13-17
    491 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:38 pm
    You can kinda see the photoshop effect on her sides... They look... Computer generated...
  31. Profile photo of Thorna_Kate
    Thorna_Kate Female 18-29
    237 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 1:44 pm
    Well if they put her in knickers that fit it wouldn`t have cut into her so called "fat" and made her look like she`s chunky.

    Natural beauty FTW. I`m sure she is fine before the editing.
  32. Profile photo of durdikkimeng
    durdikkimeng Male 50-59
    743 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 2:46 pm
    It`s all wrong.Look at the angles.
    Total pretend fail...fail!
  33. Profile photo of kerryfairy82
    kerryfairy82 Female 18-29
    839 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 3:15 pm
    i think that`s Imogen off UK Big Brother a few years ago
  34. Profile photo of mamba
    mamba Male 18-29
    628 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 3:16 pm
    looks shopped, the line on the right shoulder looks too straight, a pro wouldnt do it that badly on part of the shadow and miss editing other parts
  35. Profile photo of spocksbeard
    spocksbeard Male 18-29
    55 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 3:24 pm
    mamba: looks shopped, the line on the right shoulder looks too straight, a pro wouldnt do it that badly on part of the shadow and miss editing other parts

    --
    That`s the point, its a bad shop.
  36. Profile photo of Raberboom
    Raberboom Male 18-29
    833 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 3:41 pm
    The light could be coming from under her...
  37. Profile photo of radishboy
    radishboy Male 18-29
    46 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 3:46 pm
    it`s so strange to me that there are so many people that just do not get it. no matter what it is, they fail to understand exactly what`s going on. I don`t know if they just don`t bother to read anything, or they only process what they want to see or what it is. yes, it`s shopped. that`s the point. that is the entire reason why this picture was posted here. it was shopped, poorly, as they forgot to remove her "fat" rolls.
  38. Profile photo of Spocom
    Spocom Female 13-17
    709 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 3:52 pm
    Ugh her muffin top haunts her, even in her photoshopped pictures!
  39. Profile photo of iiiihatejmac
    iiiihatejmac Female 18-29
    477 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 4:17 pm
    haha

    they should just stop photoshopping
    jessica & britney did it and look fine
  40. Profile photo of daniellee_x
    daniellee_x Female 18-29
    451 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 4:19 pm
    No one who is that skinny has such big boobs.
  41. Profile photo of BBQ
    BBQ Male 18-29
    467 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 4:37 pm
    @daniellee_x
    I beg to differ. A girl half her size can still have her boobs. I was a skeptic at fist too, but I felt and handled them. Then I believed.
  42. Profile photo of Fleeance1
    Fleeance1 Male 18-29
    2 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 5:23 pm
    I think its more likely that the shadows were added as appose to a reduction in the ladies body size... Look at the shadow under her thigh, also... where is the lighting actually coming from if the shadows wernt shopped into the photo?
  43. Profile photo of rikakitty
    rikakitty Female 18-29
    683 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 5:38 pm
    who cares, she`s hot. seriously.
  44. Profile photo of Steelgrid
    Steelgrid Male 30-39
    2700 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 6:04 pm
    Fantastic!!!!
  45. Profile photo of bigbaddave
    bigbaddave Male 40-49
    214 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 6:07 pm
    I`ve seen skinny and small women with huge hooters so its entirely possible that this girls fun bags are the real deal
  46. Profile photo of tiggerwitch1
    tiggerwitch1 Female 18-29
    587 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 6:34 pm
    if the sides were taken in using Photoshop, why would there be a shadow in the first place? i think the shadow itself is the doctored part
  47. Profile photo of IssaTheFiend
    IssaTheFiend Female 18-29
    2354 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 6:55 pm
    Why would you bother to shop in a muffin top shadow?
  48. Profile photo of erikthevikin
    erikthevikin Male 30-39
    757 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 7:59 pm
    Shopped
  49. Profile photo of remus
    remus Male 30-39
    21 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 8:25 pm
    her name is imogen thomas, was in big brother uk a few years ago, boobs are "enhanced"
  50. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 9:13 pm
    Clearly, ALL the shadows on the wall have been added. If you look at the shadows on her face and under her bewbs, you can see that the main lights are definitely from above, yet the shadows on the wall seem to be from a light from below. The one above her left shoulder is especially poorly done.

    So, she doesn`t really have a muffin top, but those bewbs are absolutely, 100% fake, fake, FAKE!
  51. Profile photo of jeepjones
    jeepjones Male 30-39
    554 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 10:39 pm
    Who cares if those Bewbs are fake? They`re NICE NICE NICE!
  52. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8309 posts
    April 16, 2010 at 11:14 pm
    Simple logic tells you its a shadow not a muffin top, BECAUSE this is a model in a photo shoot; they`re not likely to pick a model with a muffin top for it.
  53. Profile photo of smooshu
    smooshu Male 18-29
    73 posts
    April 17, 2010 at 12:50 am
    lol the shadows were photoshopped
  54. Profile photo of duffytoler
    duffytoler Male 40-49
    5196 posts
    April 17, 2010 at 9:12 am
    Belly button is wrong, too.
  55. Profile photo of wellsy57
    wellsy57 Male 50-59
    229 posts
    April 17, 2010 at 10:17 am
    more than one light source....
  56. Profile photo of patticakes
    patticakes Female 18-29
    463 posts
    April 17, 2010 at 2:22 pm
    Telltale shadow.
  57. Profile photo of CreepyShanny
    CreepyShanny Female 18-29
    152 posts
    April 17, 2010 at 6:39 pm
    Hmm to me the shadow looks real, like even up by her shoulder on the right it looks a lil plumper than the picture leads on.
    And to me this doesn`t look like a high quality photo shoot anyway. i bet you just some regular chick decided to re-touch some sexy photos for the internet....but eh thats just me
  58. Profile photo of MrsPoods
    MrsPoods Female 18-29
    547 posts
    April 18, 2010 at 8:14 am
    Do I care? No, still fap-worthy.
  59. Profile photo of kimkio
    kimkio Female 18-29
    878 posts
    April 18, 2010 at 9:49 am
    ok, who`s willing to bet on those breasts reality?
  60. Profile photo of LordSameth
    LordSameth Male 18-29
    35 posts
    April 18, 2010 at 1:32 pm
    I don`t think any heterosexual man would notice this if the red circle wasn`t there...

    :)
  61. Profile photo of MattPrince
    MattPrince Male 40-49
    2220 posts
    April 19, 2010 at 10:57 am
    What red circle?
  62. Profile photo of xamilo
    xamilo Male 18-29
    128 posts
    April 19, 2010 at 2:21 pm
    You`re right LordSameth. I wouldn`t have noticed so without the red circle hehehehe

Leave a Reply