Utah In DEEP Financial Poo, Mortgaging Teens

Submitted by: goog! 7 years ago in
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-utah-school15-2010feb15,0,906102.story

How deep you ask? Let"s put it this way: There"s gonna be a lot more uneducated dummies coming out of the Mormon state.
There are 117 comments:
Male 96
well now I`m confused
0
Reply
Male 893
No one cares about the penis size graph.
We`re talking about the wage graph.
0
Reply
Male 96
last time, i promise, Baalthazaq whats the x and the y in your fancy graph? does it have to do with unemployment and penis size? Assuming x represents "penis size" were are the numbers? i will assume steps of 10 million penis units (thats a lot of dick, i think?). You know i couldn`t just throw smart at the other dude and not screw with you a little bit
0
Reply
Male 96
one more thing grow up, get over yourself, and find a job, nobody cares about your package
0
Reply
Male 96
ooh i looked at it again, now that i found the "key" (you make us educated people look stupid with your lack of knowing how to draw a graph) I doubt that my penis size is directly proportional to disagreeing with your graph or that your penis size is directly proportional to the number of people that disagree with you. Do you have any scientific evidence to back it up? Pictures of your penis getting bigger and people stating they disagree with you would suffice. Or publication of your findings in a peer journal?
0
Reply
Male 96
portant part of af that if you plan to go to a non community college
0
Reply
Male 96
come on people are you really that stupid? The graph says there is always a "penis size" and there is always "how angrily people disagree with anarchistgod" (a little full of yourself? i assure you you are neither of the things in your handle). There isn`t two supplies and two demands. I dropped out of high school and failed economics (twice) and still managed to figure that out (the two lines are different colors). Before anyone tells me I`m stupid let me add Net supply and Net demand. There is one net supply and one net demand. Also (the two colors thing was a joke) were is the key what does the red line represent; what does the yellow line represent? (oh no a semicolon what does it mean?) i agree with locked up i started college 3 days after my 18th birthday w/o (without) a GED. If i stayed in school it would have been long after. But high school is very important to get a "real job", I don`t have one my degree is culinary arts, and High school is an im
0
Reply
Male 893
@Baalthazaq
"Now, what does that mean? That means that equilibrium does not result in 100% employment, unless you sandwich anyone "unwilling to work for the equilibrium price" as "everyone unwilling to work".

"That`s not correct. It`s just everyone unwilling to work for equilibrium price. When you factor in the inelastic demand of many products and services, minimum wage boosts actual employment, by bringing several people back in to the "willing to work" category."

This shows a very poor understanding of the supply and demand graph. Everyone is willing to work at the equilibrium! If they don`t then BY DIFINITION it`s not equilibrium. Understand what the equilibrium means before you post such comments.

0
Reply
Female 1,283
=O

Graph wars >.>...

0
Reply
Male 4,546
Slowly, you`re agreeing with my original points:

Some quotes from you:
"On side note know that full employment is NOT everyone having a job.
Full employment mean everyone who is able to work and wants to work has a job".


My quote: "Unemployment is solely on your graph the gap between supply and demand. This is true only if equilibrium results in 100% employment. It does not".

Your quote: "Yes it does".

Now, what does that mean? That means that equilibrium does not result in 100% employment, unless you sandwich anyone "unwilling to work for the equilibrium price" as "everyone unwilling to work".

That`s not correct. It`s just everyone unwilling to work for equilibrium price. When you factor in the inelastic demand of many products and services, minimum wage boosts actual employment, by bringing several people back in to the "willing to work" category.

0
Reply
Male 893
When the state enforces a barrier then people just don`t disappear. They for the most part become unemployed. If there was no barriers or price cap(minimum wage) the market would lean to full employment. If the supply is limited then wages go up which is a bad thing if there are people who are able to work but can`t because of the barrier.

On side note know that full employment is NOT everyone having a job. Full employment mean everyone who is able to work and wants to work has a job.

0
Reply
Male 893
oops you`re right. I had no idea what the hell Baal was.

Anyway I`ll get back to you about barriers.

Here I fixed it.

0
Reply
Male 4,546
"So which is it"

Both.
My graph says "I have a big penis, you have a little one".
Your graph says "I have a big penis, I have a little one".

You only changed the name on the axis, and didn`t change the name on the actual series data. (my name appears twice on the original graph, you changed it once)

Not ironically, this is the exact same mistake you are making with your earlier graph, assuming that it applies in all circumstances just by changing the axes.

It doesn`t. You need to change the series data too.

0
Reply
Male 4,546
"Barriers to entry limit supply of workers".

Ok. According to you this drives salaries up and therefore drives up unemployment.

You are thus suggesting that higher unemployment countries have more barriers to entry, and that BY COINCIDENCE these are the countries without minimum wages enough to skew it by at least 5%?

Also, higher salaries occurring naturally would skip the minimum wage in most cases, placing the equilibrium point above minimum wage, and thus causing the minimum wage to have (even according to your video) no impact at all.

0
Reply
Male 893
First you say "I refer you to my earlier graph, and thank you for your contribution to my penis size."

Then I change the name to mine and then you say "Incidentally, the graph you posted just for fun, suggests that *MY* penis size grows the more *ANYONE* disagrees with you.
Saying as I disagree with you, your graph suggests I have two penises; One large and one small."

So which is it?

0
Reply
Male 893
Actually your graph makes no sense and I`m making fun of you for it.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Incidentally, the graph you posted just for fun, suggests that *MY* penis size grows the more *ANYONE* disagrees with you.

Saying as I disagree with you, your graph suggests I have two penises; One large and one small.

I`d suggest you revise your knowledge of graphs and try again.

0
Reply
Male 893
Barriers to entry limit competition. Therefore limit the supply of workers.

We should continue this. I have to go to bed now.


0
Reply
Male 4,546
Let me quickly explain what an Ad Hominem is:
"I regret to inform you that you’re all economic illiterates".

That. Attacking the person instead of the argument. Literally translated to "Against the man".

Anything else?

Unless you can demonstrate that barriers to entry cause the graph to skew in the opposite direction of your proposal, you need to come up with something else.

0
Reply
Male 893
Just for fun.


0
Reply
Male 893
"Again, if you have an explanation for why reality disagrees with you, I`d love to hear it."

More stuff = lower price.
Less stuff = higher price.

What don`t you understand?

0
Reply
Male 893
You can`t just replace supply and demand with Angry Disagreers and Baal. You know that. I never heard of the Angry Disagreers and Baal graph.

I told you that barriers to entry are to blame.

It accurately shows WAGES.Ad hominem

0
Reply
Male 4,546
I refer you to my earlier graph, and thank you for your contribution to my penis size. I just want to say I appreciate the sacrifices you are making to your own. (NO DATA IS NEEDED FOR THIS TO BE TURE).

Again, if you have an explanation for why reality disagrees with you, I`d love to hear it.

I`d especially love to hear how your graph (which is "not oversimplified", and therefore must contain all major factors) does not accurately map reality.

"These are all the factors needed".
No.
They are not.

0
Reply
Male 893
@Baalthazaq
"It`s not about understanding a supply and demand graph, it is about oversimplifying a more complex system with a simple one."
No it`s not.
"Yes, you need to demonstrate that your supply and demand graph (never designed for Wages,not taking into account all factors, counter intuitively applied to minimum wage) still holds true."
It CAN be used for wages. If there more people able to work(higher supply), then the supply line shifts to the right which in turn lowers wages (NO DATA NEEDED FOR THIS TO BE TURE).
The more labor that needs to be done(higher demand), then the demand line shifts to the right which in turn increases wages(NO DATA NEEDED FOR THIS TO BE TURE).
And vis-verse. Same concept applies if it was the price of product X instead of wages.
There`s supply(workers) and demand(stuff that needs to get done though labor) There`s ALL your factors need to explain wages.
0
Reply
Male 893
Did you know that counter intuitively was applied to a flat Earth?
0
Reply
Male 893
"Which is why I said, in my very first post, that is was a "real graph" (this was before you pretended I didn`t recognize the graph) "with pretend data" (because there is little to no evidence the minimum wage has that effect)."

YOU’RE A LIAR!!! You NEVER said that it was a real graph. This is what actually said “It was not designed to interpret minimum wage, it never has, it never will.” Also I did NOT provide “pretend data” because there is NO data that needs to be provided.

0
Reply
Male 893
"His theory does not match reality."
Yes it does. The problem is barriers to entry.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Again, I can`t stress this enough, the graph I provided should not be taken as proof that the minimum wage impacts employment positively (though it could be taken as evidence).

I was merely seeking to demonstrate that a market is much more complex than it is being suggested thus far.

Taking away minimum wage would in my opinion not impact employment greatly, however would impact quality of life significantly for a lot of people, and thus, is a bad idea for a government to implement without other measures in place to compensate.

Measures which are expensive and time consuming to get right and implement.

0
Reply
Male 4,546
Here is a graph with real data.
Sources:
Minimum Wages.
Unemployment.

Countries with unavailable data have been removed.

All figures have been adjusted to account for only the minimum wage salary, and countries with no state set minimum wage (Sweden for example) have had their "monthly wage" figure replaced with 0.

What you should expect to see, according to Anarchist, is the opposite of this:

Countries with minimum wages have higher employment rates than those without. This does not mean there is causation, but it does mean Mr. Anarchist has some explaining to do.

His theory does not match reality.

0
Reply
Female 1,283
Hm...So, the real issue would be to drop minimum wage laws?
Would you suggest this is a viable option nationally, or just certain areas? The problem here in CO seems to be too many people and not enough hours >.>
0
Reply
Female 299
lol, I dropped out of high school halfway through my junior year. I was failing all my classes because I couldn`t be bothered to show up. I had my G. E. D. and was signed up for college in a month. I`m now finishing my B. S. in Mathematics and getting ready to start grad school. My opinion on high school? Get out as soon as possible.
0
Reply
Male 4,546
It`s not about understanding a supply and demand graph, it is about oversimplifying a more complex system with a simple one.

"I don`t need to provide data".

Yes, you need to demonstrate that your supply and demand graph (never designed for Wages, not taking into account all factors, counter intuitively applied to minimum wage) still holds true.

Which is why I said, in my very first post, that is was a "real graph" (this was before you pretended I didn`t recognize the graph) "with pretend data" (because there is little to no evidence the minimum wage has that effect).

0
Reply
Male 335
Those idiots are under the impression that they will be FORCED to skip senior year, when in fact it says plainy it would be OPTIONAL for people who have completed the required credits early. If I had finished my credits that early in high school, I would have skipped senior year for sure. High school sucks ass.
Then again, I would never set foot in Utah, so...
0
Reply
Male 2,056
ok, are you serial?
0
Reply
Male 893
"So, our market would be virtually immune to any hassle (with the exception of free labor) if minimum wage were to drop?"

No. The free market is not perfect. Just like evolution is not perfect.
However the free market and evolution both have something in common. They work in a bottom up manner. Unlike a god and a state that work in a top down manner.

I became an atheist around the same time I was introduced to evolution.

I became an anarchist around the same time I was introduced to the free market.

0
Reply
Male 14,331
Why don`t they cut non vital programs like sports instead of a year off or beter yet get rid of a bunch of the useless politicians. Schools for learning not playing sports.
0
Reply
Male 795
Compared to California this is a nothing. California is going to be filled with people that can`t afford college, and if they could they wouldn`t be able to get in anyways. On top of that we`ll be paying off our 20 BILLION dollar deficit for the next three generations (Thanks baby boomers). That is if the legislators can get off their @$$ and get AHNALD to pull his head out of his rectum.
0
Reply
Female 1,283
I know D:
Toxin-related garbage is more my thing >.>

...Went through and looked at what you said and got it to make sense.
So, our market would be virtually immune to any hassle (with the exception of free labor) if minimum wage were to drop?

0
Reply
Male 893
@Baalthazaq
"Ah, but you still fail to provide actual data"

I don`t have to. It amazes me that people don`t understand a simple supply and demand graph.

0
Reply
Male 893
@Baalthazaq

"Unemployment is solely on your graph the gap between supply and demand. This is true only if equilibrium results in 100% employment. It does not."

Yes it does! You have no idea what you are talking about. I don`t even know where to begin with you.

Unemployment

0
Reply
Male 4,546
Incase you still don`t:
Basically, I explained the interpretation of the graph. You need to demonstrate how they apply.

Does it apply to monopolies? No. It fails to account for a worker`s marginal value, and thus is effectively a failure of the market.

Does it apply to states? No.
Does it take into account the ability to move between sectors? No.

0
Reply
Male 4,546
Ah, but you still fail to provide actual data. You are assuming that this simplistic model has you covered, minus data.

1) Minimum wage does not apply to:
Self Employed.
Service Workers.
Farm Workers.

Thus Minimum wage could arguably boost entrepreneurship, and thus boost employment. Your model does not in any way shape or form take this into account.

Why?

Because it has no real data. It was not designed to interpret minimum wage, it never has, it never will.

2) Unemployment is solely on your graph the gap between supply and demand. This is true only if equilibrium results in 100% employment. It does not.

Your "unemployment" gap is only "Lost jobs".

3) Your graph fails to include productivity, training (effectively "employee CAPEX"), minimum wage lowers low ROI employee retention by increasing OPEX and opens up spaces for people who want to work but can`t.

Out of space, but you get the idea.

0
Reply
Male 893
Especially Baalthazaq.

Sorry Baalthazaq, but it’s just true. :-(

0
Reply
Male 893
Dear Baalthazaq, davymid, Ria25, JimmytheMed, Skreshavik

I regret to inform you that you’re all economic illiterates.

Price Control
The video was hit by a votebot, so don`t mind the low rating.

Regards,
AnarchistGod

0
Reply
Male 4,546
Davy, it doesn`t.

As wages increase, demand is higher. (Makes sense).
As wages increase, supply goes down. (Tenuous).
The more people that are in the work force, the less demand there is. (Totally counter intuitive).
The more people in the work force, the more supply there is. (Makes sense).

This is an accurate picture of his point, however I don`t think his point is an accurate picture of reality. (In other words, it`s not a real graph of data, it`s a graph of pretend data).

For example, here is a graph I made up just now.

It has no bearing on reality, if it did, I`d join all the flame wars on IAB... wait...

0
Reply
Female 612
Joex, that quote meant it has left them with unpopular decisions, as in their only options left are not good ones, not that Left-wingers have unpopular decisions....
0
Reply
Female 3,828
sigh. well nothing surprises me about the american government anymore.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
Hold on AnarchistGod, I`m good at graphs... I`ve even been accused of being an analyst in the past. Why and how exactly does demand decrease as wages increase along the Y axis? Pretty critical to validate your point. BTW, nice cat.
0
Reply
Female 125
Jimmy, minimum wage varies by state. Most states have a minimum of between $7.00-$8.00.

Anarchist, the whole graph made absolutely no sense. That was untill I saw the cat, now everything falls into perspective. <3

0
Reply
Male 557
The sudden buzz over the relative value of senior year stems from a recent proposal by state Sen. Chris Buttars that Utah make a dent in its budget gap by eliminating the 12th grade.

The notion quickly gained some traction among supporters who agreed with the REPUBLICAN`S assessment that many seniors frittered away their final year of high school, but faced vehement opposition from other quarters, including in his hometown of West Jordan.
``
``
a policy associate with the National Conference of State Legislatures. "It`s LEFT lawmakers with very unpopular decisions."

How did a Replublican draft it, yet liberal lawmakers were blamed for it?


0
Reply
Female 1,283
Well...what if we go back to the industrial age?
It`ll be akin to making $0.5 an hour.

How would we find a happy medium?
That graph is cute, btw :D

0
Reply
Male 46
AnarchistGod: I just find it hard to believe a country as rich as yours can`t afford to pay what people NEED to live. You can not live off 3$/hr in America unless the price of living dropped dramatically.
But you have MS Paint graphs AND and MS paint cat, so I`m inclined to be on your side. I have no Graphs.
0
Reply
Male 46
AnarchistGod: The minimum wage may be a problem for some companies, I`ll submit to that. Perhaps since where I come from the minimum wage ( we don`t have a minimum wage per-se, but there are guidelines and it can get pretty bad for an employer who chooses to ignore them completely) is more that double the average American minimum wage and no one here is having trouble paying it to their workers I can`t grasp why American employers would have trouble paying what to me is an insultingly low minimum wage. But that`s not the main problem. The problem is 1) People being replaced by machines. 2) American businessmen that are unwilling to sell for a price people can afford and 3) Consumers that won`t buy for a price that allows the supplier to profit. Everyone wants to make or save a quick buck at the expense of another and I wish you guys would get your poo together and meet in the middle so you can stop drating up the rest of our economies.
Again, <3 America. You guys rock.
0
Reply
Female 1,134
@AnarchistGod

i have been a member of IAB since 2006 and never in my IAB life have i seen a person use MS paint to prove their point. you sir made my day.

but not to say someone else did but thats a first to see. and btw i love the cat drawing xD

0
Reply
Male 893
@JimmytheMed
We need to get rid of the minimum wage.
When there are more people in the structure of production, prices fall.
In this picture the yellow line is minimum wage.
The rest is self explanatory.
0
Reply
Male 893
@JimmytheMed

No, you`re wrong. America has a hard time competing with Indians because our minimum wage is WAY too high. A minimum wage law is an unemployment law. That is, if someone is willing and able to work for $3 an hour, and an employer is willing to pay $3 an hour, the employer will thrown in prison for doing so.

0
Reply
Male 46
Videogamer: You`re partially wrong. The demand for labor is low for a few reasons, the minimum wage, which is very low in America, has little to do with it. 7.XX is less than 50% of the minimum wage in some countries.We have computers to blame for the low labor needs. THOUSANDS of factory workers per fectory have been replaces by robots. Why hire thousands of workers when you can hire 100 to fix the machines that build the cars or cut the meat? By 2050 there will be very little for you to do if you can`t build a circuit board or program or rewire and android. No, I`m not a technophobe. I have BAs in electrical engineering and IT. Another huge problem is outsourcing. Face it, Americans businessmen have no idea what it means to help out or lower prices or provide more for less. Why hire an American and pay him 7.50/hr when that same 7.50/hr will get you 5 Indians that all work 12 hour days? Also, I love America but it`s a sinking ship. Don`t call me a racist American hater.
0
Reply
Male 269
Senator Buttars? Like...a guitar? Or a keytar? But a butt-tar?
buttarists...
0
Reply
Male 893
@videogamer

That is a PERFECT reply! It was exactly what I was thinking.

0
Reply
Male 10,440
Oh, and can we get rid of these bots? Bots are the mark of a terrible website.
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Nooo! Please. Not this. The world needs a stable America. This is gonna f*ck things up.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
I guess it`s just too much to ask of the public school system to provide students with a decent education for 12 whole years.
0
Reply
Male 716
Because less education is definately what this nation needs!
0
Reply
Male 3,014
"How can demand for labor be low in the first place?"

I`m glad you asked. It turns out that employers are hesitant to add to their payroll because they have to adhere to a minimum wage, which is steadily increasing. The demand is less, because fewer potential employees are qualified for those earnings. The truth is, there are actually people who are willing to work below that wage, particularly people living on their own.

IMO, the government needs to stop enforcing the minimum wage. It should be nothing more than a yardstick for employers to follow. If job-seekers aren`t satisfied by the wage a potential boss offers, they`ll keep looking until someone gives it to them. We`re perfectly capable of doing that.

0
Reply
Male 893
"If the demand for labor is low how, does speeding up the process of high school graduation and assumable college graduation help the economy one bit?"

It would not help the economy in just one bit. It would help the economy A LOT!
How can demand for labor be low in the first place? Everyone has to push their own weight. Besides high schools today are just VERY poor investments in human capital. You`re NOT helping people be making them pay and go to schools that hardly teach anything useful in the market.

0
Reply
Male 9,305
"@Nidonemo absolutely getting rid of 12th is a bad idea. But making it optional is not a bad idea, read it carefully it says:
"12th grade is optional to those who have acquired all their credits." Why waste the money when you got all the credits you need to graduate? I don`t see the trade off."

Okay now I can understand this POV, and to be honest I can agree with it.

0
Reply
Female 1,077
this is so indescribably retarded that commenting on it in detail would just be a waste of words.
0
Reply
Male 493
I know a lot of people who had senioritis, but my senior year proved to be essential when I got into college. Although my grades were good enough entering senior year, my first semester grades that year was what really helped boost me into the school I wanted. And my senior year was the only year I took AP courses, and the credit REALLY helped getting classes out of the way freshman year, and it really proved to be a good academic transition year. It would have been jarring to go straight from high school junior to college freshman.

Cutting out the 12th grade would be a terrible idea. You pretty much damn the hopes of anyone hoping to get into good colleges. There are FAR better ways to fix a debt that screw over the academic and financial hopes of those graduating.

0
Reply
Male 736
lol, he`s giving up. watching you in the olympics, i`d say that there are plenty of you yanks that DON`T give up, and that WON`T give up, which cheers me. it`s just a bit frightening that there aren`t enough of you that vote, thus Palin/Bush. not to say that we haven`t generated our share of politico-disasters...
0
Reply
Male 395
Probably not a good idea in a time of high unemployment!
0
Reply
Female 1,283
Evilcupcake, why haven`t you impeached the SoB =p ?
0
Reply
Male 1,404
If the demand for labor is low how, does speeding up the process of high school graduation and assumable college graduation help the economy one bit? Unless your only goal is to balance the educational budget and throw the next generation out to dry, then your on to something.
0
Reply
Male 239
always education that gets cut first. Freaking politicians lining their pockets with what is supposed to go to state funds. Horrible.
0
Reply
Male 81
believe me when I say about 90% of us here in Utah wish Senator Butters would just go away. he has provided us with a few to many headaches.
0
Reply
Male 893
"Personally I disagree, what do you find good about this idea?"

If 17 year olds don`t work, because they have to go to school, then less things are being produced. Thus damaging the economy. If they are sent to school then that is mostly a waste because most people don`t learn poo in school. If that`s what people want, then that`s what they will choose to pay for.

0
Reply
Male 893
"Getting rid of senior year is a stupid idea and only encourages slacking off."

No, getting kids to do what they don`t want to do is what allows slacking off in the first place.

0
Reply
Female 1,545
My best year of learning was definitely senior year. AP English, AP Calc, Anatomy and Physiology, not to mention I qualified for state in Solo and Ensemble.

Getting rid of senior year is a stupid idea and only encourages slacking off.

0
Reply
Male 99
"be honest, did anyone actually learn anything senior year? unless you`re an idiot you have all your required classes and are only taking filler classes to pass the day. it`s a waste. if you don`t have all your required courses, you probably dropped out, will end up dropping out, or will be coming back at least a half year to finish. if they don`t want to be there why waste the money?"

Took AP computer science, Calculus and statistics during senior year (Yeah I`m a nerd sue me). I don`t know HOW I would get through first year college without those. XD

0
Reply
Male 10,855
@Nidonemo absolutely getting rid of 12th is a bad idea. But making it optional is not a bad idea, read it carefully it says:
"12th grade is optional to those who have acquired all their credits." Why waste the money when you got all the credits you need to graduate? I don`t see the trade off.
0
Reply
Male 46
"Personally I disagree, what do you find good about this idea?"

What did you do your senior year? Speech? History of rock? Underwater Basket Weaving? No one I know besides calculus majors did anything remotely productive their senior years, and all my friends go/went to MIT. We spent the entire time in the shop building robots because we were legally obliged to be there.

0
Reply
Male 264
let`s just make school optional in general
0
Reply
Male 8,300
> unless you`re an idiot you have all your required classes and are only taking filler classes to pass the day.

I never scored less than 97% in any subject, and in some cases where classes were held close to each other, I was allowed to set up a mike and listen to one class through an earpiece while attending another. I achieved my HSC (equivalent to your GED) in Grade 7 instead of 10, and had to be gazetted in an Act of Parliament to be allowed to leave school at the age of 14, having completed grade 12 by that time. I am regularly IQ tested by the CSIRO. The last one, 4 years ago at age 40, was 148 - it declines with age; my highest, at 18 yrs, was 171.

The downside is that I`ve suffered from depression most of my life because there is no challenge in anything.

And you thought I was just a loud-mouthed Old Fart troll who makes bad jokes on IAB all the time :-)

0
Reply
Female 71
i hate utah, people are so retarded here
0
Reply
Male 9,305
"This is actually a VERY good idea."

Personally I disagree, what do you find good about this idea?

0
Reply
Male 1,918
"NOT dratING COOL RIGHT AS I LEAVE 12TH GRADE THEY dratING DESIDE TO dratING TAKE OUT 12TH GRADE THATS dratING DUMN. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. AND I USE TO GO TO WEST JORDAN HIGH I HATED THAT SKOOL THIS IS SOME BULLpoo! i knew JD..."

With the misspelling of the word school, dumb, and decide, plus the grammar mistakes and the missing ` in that`s(with spell check I might add)it looks like you need school. If you`re already done why bother complaining?

0
Reply
Male 893
This is actually a VERY good idea.
0
Reply
Female 1,283
So it`s come to the point of wasting 500 million dollar bombs on four people and a camel is more important than education?

Good thing this`ll never pass.

0
Reply
Female 296
NOT dratING COOL RIGHT AS I LEAVE 12TH GRADE THEY dratING DESIDE TO dratING TAKE OUT 12TH GRADE THATS dratING DUMN. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. AND I USE TO GO TO WEST JORDAN HIGH I HATED THAT SKOOL THIS IS SOME BULLpoo! i knew JD...
0
Reply
Female 9,572
I hated my senior year.
0
Reply
Male 7,933
""unless you`re an idiot you have all your required classes and are only taking filler classes to pass the day." In New York, Four years of English and other subjects are required. I don`t think it`s possible to get to the situation you describe without doing summer school, or being a genius. "

The only credits im missing senior year are econ/gov (half a year each) and english 4. I got a 5 on the AP english language test last year meaning that i completed english 101 and english 102 in college already, im sure i could bypass english 4. And I could take econ/gov online (which is honestly my easiest class this year), and thus i finish junior year.

My friend did an accelerated program and finished junior year...he has a full ride to MIT now. My thinking is that if you wasted your time before you will continue to waste it. Give more funding towards those who want more education

0
Reply
Male 907
This reminds me of the story about how railroads found out that the last car suffered most of the damage. So, somebody suggested they take the last car off before they leave the station. Kids sluff of the last year of school, namely 12th grade. Eliminate it and they`ll sluff off the 11th grade instead.
0
Reply
Male 7,933
im doing my senior year now...i can honestly say that there isnt that much of a gain in knowledge and understanding, i would be better fit starting off college now
0
Reply
Male 3,331
PS: Yes, I know the article is about Utah, and not New York. I was just saying.
0
Reply
Male 3,331
"unless you`re an idiot you have all your required classes and are only taking filler classes to pass the day." In New York, Four years of English and other subjects are required. I don`t think it`s possible to get to the situation you describe without doing summer school, or being a genius.
0
Reply
Male 506
The only kids who think this is a good idea are the stupid ones who hate school, and would end up living off the government anyway.
0
Reply
Male 181
I made my senior year optional. I turned out OK.
0
Reply
Female 728
punkipenguin: Actually I was in a science and tech program that required that I take extra math and science classes senior year, as well as completing a research project. I found it to be a good use of my time. I know that not everyone is in similar circumstances, but most people can take at least a few worthwhile classes in senior year.
0
Reply
Female 778
be honest, did anyone actually learn anything senior year? unless you`re an idiot you have all your required classes and are only taking filler classes to pass the day. it`s a waste. if you don`t have all your required courses, you probably dropped out, will end up dropping out, or will be coming back at least a half year to finish. if they don`t want to be there why waste the money?
0
Reply
Male 270
Isn`t it already optional? Kids can drop out at 16-17.

I think they mean optional while still getting their diploma, not dropping out.

0
Reply
Male 1,195
You`re all forgetting something... F*CK UTAH!
0
Reply
Male 15
Chris Buttars is ruining Utah. If they`d stop wasting our tax money on soccer stadiums and the school sports programs we wouldn`t have this mess. It doesn`t help that our legislator Becky Lockheart is married to a lobbyist, and is therefor getting money from the tobacco and coca-cola lobbies... I`m ashamed to live in Utah. The state that was founded on the principle of running away to avoid hostility and chastisement, but still treats anyone different (democrats, mexicans, blacks and gays) like they have the plague.
0
Reply
Male 2,591
right.. because in these times we need more dumbasses
0
Reply
Male 7,378
Interesting that this idea sprang from the state with the highest consumption of porn per capita. Makes you wonder what them crazy mormons will think of next.
0
Reply
Male 533
Isn`t it already optional? Kids can drop out at 16-17.
0
Reply
Male 25,416
YAY! does this mean that teens are paying there way for once L:)
0
Reply
Male 83
Well, can`t students with enough credits skip their senior year anyway? I mean high school becomes optional after 16 doesn`t it? If you had enough credits, none of this crap would matter

You can graduate early if you have enough credits and at 16 you have the option to drop out not instantaneously graduate.

I wouldn`t have minded leaving school after my English and math. It would make saving for college a lot easier.

0
Reply
Female 2,509
Way to keep us in the education race, Utah!
0
Reply
Male 474
His original plan was to skip the 12th grade, but after coming under fire he has back-pedalled to this position which is already in place.

But if you spin it the right way aying that public school is just socialism at work and its taking tax money away fromt he rich to provide to the poor so that the poor can have the same opportunity as the rich, then you will have DROVES of ignorant people supporting this idea.

0
Reply
Male 4,593
Make `em pay for the last year if they want it so bad. Hey then they`ll make even MORE money for the government coffers.
0
Reply
Female 157
I live in Utah, and I highly doubt this will pass. Chris Buttars is one of the most idiotic senators I`ve ever heard of, and comes up with the stupidest ideas. He tried making it mandatory for store employees to say "Merry Christmas" and make it illegal for them to say anything about other religions. He`s a worthless waste of tax money, and I can`t wait until he`s gone. He`s ridiculous. There`s no way in hell that this idiotic idea of getting rid of the 12th grade will pass. Chris Buttars is a joke!
0
Reply
Female 88
This stupid because he was saying that students with enough credits can just skip their senior year. Well, can`t students with enough credits skip their senior year anyway? I mean high school becomes optional after 16 doesn`t it? If you had enough credits, none of this crap would matter
0
Reply
Female 728
This is a terrible idea. There`s no reason why the state should be giving students the a-okay to throw away free education. And the excuse they made about senioritis would apply just the same once students decide that they won`t take senior year. Then it would be junioritis.

There have to be other ways that the state can cut the budget. Cutting education becomes a vicious cycle, as it reduces the state`s earning potential in the long run, thus ensuring future budget problems.

0
Reply
Male 472
This is a great idea. We need to do it in California. Just make sure that Junior year actually has things for the kids to do, so it can`t be wasted.
0
Reply
Male 976
Wow, idiots should not be allowed to decide what of should be cut for financial reasons.
0
Reply
Female 387
I wasn`t ready for the world at 18 even. This is a horrible idea.
0
Reply
Male 3,331
I love his reasoning. They waste their Senior year, but don`t their Junior, so just eliminate the Senior year. Doesn`t he remember his childhood? If he did, he`d know that eliminating the Senior year would just mean kids would waste their Junior year instead! (I know I would have!)
0
Reply
Male 320
Link: Utah In DEEP Financial Poo, Mortgaging Teens [Rate Link] - How deep you ask? Let`s put it this way: There`s gonna be a lot more uneducated dummies coming out of the Mormon state.
0
Reply