Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
As for the non-nice individuals interviewing him; a decent reporter remains unbiased when conducting the interview, and asks question in such a way as to shed light on a certain subject. They allow the person to tell their side of a story, and allow viewers to come to their own conclusions. What these stupid people did was simply piss off a man they already felt was guilty, and use his response to an unrelated situation to incriminate him. The worst part? They weren`t even very good at it. Their pathetic attempt was laughably transparent. Piece of crap show.
in fact, I did get pissed off at that blond chick
THAT is f*cked up
"What i saw there requiers medication" Yeah because about a minute of footage is enough to base an assesment of a persons mental health on. Goddamn Dr Phil-parapsychology Motherf**kers
no it is hahah its real
A reputable psychologist wouldn`t be so eager to solve a problem with medication.
They were all ganging up on him and treating like like crap. He just blew up after she wouldn`t take NO for an answer--and kept pressing him to say yes. It`s clear she was goading this kind of sensationalist crap. They knew he would blow up. What man wouldn`t flip out if he DIDN`T hit his wife and had some non-nice individual telling them they were abusive?
If he did, that`s another story--but a man who doesn`t abuse his wife would be just as pissed.
What difference would it have made? He`s probably been advised not to speak directly about the case. People involved in ongoing legal cases usually are. But he answered the question and she ignored his answer - answering it again with a different phrasing wouldn`t have made any difference. The point of the question wasn`t to get an answer. It was to get a conviction. Trial by TV. Juries watch TV. Unless the jury is currently in complete isolation and has no contact with the outside world, the TV show has increased the chance of him being convicted. I think that was the point of the show.
Size matters little in domestic violence. The key point is willingness to do harm, not size. I`ve known of several abusive relationships in which the victim was far bigger than the abuser.
But I think this says nothing about him. An extremely stressed person was very deliberately and expertly provoked in an arena set up specifically for that purpose. He raised his voice, swore a bit and left. It was rigged, and well rigged, for him to lose. He had no way of not losing. Leaving was the least bad course of action available to him once he`d been suckered into the arena by lies. It was obvious that they`d lied to him - they pretended it was an opportunity for him to give his side of the story.
And he didn`t look remotely close to hitting anyway he said what I`m going to do is walk away, a person who walks away from a heated situation is considered violent? give the guy a break.
idea#1 get a `c` cleb on that is prone to outbursts...
idea#2 firstly,interview him in such a way as to put him at ease...
idea#3 ask him the question that is sure to agitate him, do not accept anything other than a full confession...prevoke him until you get `the scoop`...OR NOT!!!
idea#4 continue until he gets irate and storms offand get some quack on to defend the whole sordid episode...win ,win situtation.
idea#5 this will be on the internet for everyone to pour vitriol on an unimportant cleb that has fallen on hard times who will take any gig in town to pay his bills,just like the rest of you...
very worst of Television....
`Cause i haven`t heard that in a LONG time"
lol i knew it would censor me so i censored mtself
Congratulations, you sir are f**king retarded.
f u c k w i t Television of the highest order!!!
Ignorant entertainment hosts have nothing to do with feminism. Feminism isn`t whatever ugly face you seem to have attached to it.
She knows he can`t answer the question directly on live TV because he has an upcoming trial. His lawyer probably instructed him not to answer that kind of question directly. That`s the number one rule of interviews regarding current events! You can`t ask them whether they did it or not, that`s for the court to decide. She`s just trying to score cheap shot viewer points to make it seem like he`s guilty.
Agree with all points except the last. He wasn`t spoiled. His parents took his money and he`s now poor as hell, working as a security guard. Never seen celebrity parents as greedy as his. You`d understand why he`s bitter because of it.
she was quite the bitch though....ex-domestic violence recipient perhaps?
So of course he was going to blow up. I would too!
`Cause i haven`t heard that in a LONG time
If someone went on at me like she did, especially after I had already answered her damn question and she still wasn`t satisfied, I;d also get frustrated but I would also do the same and walk away. That`s what he did. Lucky he didn`t hit someone, what a load of -.
i thought that was obvious lol