Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
This is partially true. Removing the foreskin can prevent infections. I know of men who have gotten yeast infections for example not because they are unclean but because no one is in a shower all the time, and sometimes sex happens when you`re not expecting it. Pui, you have had many UTI`s due to the fact your urethra is much shorter than a mans, and more prone to infection. There is also evidence that circumcision is reducing the spread of AIDS in Africa. The truth is there are actually quite a few men who opt for circumcision later in life.
Women have many folds of skin down there. These folds of skin are quite prone to collecting dirt, smelling and causing infections, all of the things people are worried about with foreskins. However, by practicing proper hygiene, this is not usually a problem for women. I assume men are just as capable of cleaning themselves.
I have been with and known quite a few uncut men, and none of them have ever had any problem. *I* have had 5 urinary tract infections in my life!
Removing all the folds of skin women have at birth would probably help prevent these and other infections, but would anyone think THAT is a good idea?
No. No they wouldn`t.
This is not to say I have anything against cut men, in the end it is like almost the same thing to me anyway. Besides, it`s the parents who made the decision, not them. Gee, not only was something cut off that did not need to be, the person it was cut off of didn`t even get a choice in the matter.
Is that a physical, or social, effect, though? Isn`t circumcision the norm in the United States? If something is the norm, then not having what`s normal is bound to be of a detriment.
If this study went across borders and compared against European countries where circumcision is not as common, then you`d have a better measure of the physical effect of circumcision.
I`d stop feeling sorry for them. They have more sex, more often, for longer, and of more varied kinds, suffer from less sexual dysfunction, and a slightly decreased risk of various diseases.
There is only anecdotal evidence to suggest it is less sensitive, and I can assure you, "an inch below my grand canyon" is certainly a hell of a lot more sensitive than my big toe.
Study Link.Wiki Link.
It`s to compensate for the fact that your dick is an ugly turtle.
Uncut. Exposing the head causes desensitization of the nerve endings because of the constant rubbing, and the dick is nowhere near as sensitive as it should be. Touch your big toe, then touch your upper leg a half-inch from the grand canyon. See how much sensitive your skin is to touch up there, because it still has all its nerves intact.
I pity cut guys, "it" can`t be anywhere near as sensuous for them.
So for those worrying so much, here`s what`s wrong, in medical language: When bubby`s wee moves down the pipe, his third eye isn`t opening quite as early as it should and the pressure of the pee is pushing his soft skin into a bulge. Then the eye opens and out it comes. When his skin becomes firmer, everything will work as it should.
The First Rule of Parenting (which most of us don`t learn until about 5 years too late) is: "Don`t panic, its probably nothing." We`d all save ourselves a helluva lot of stress if we learned it earlier.
Which is better? Cut, or uncut?
WHAT IS YOUR OPINION, IAB?
Are you a Totally Real Doctor, too?
Still, it was smart of him (relatively speaking) to post the comment, take a picture for posterity, then delete the comment before the question guy noticed, took it seriously, and called the feds. I can`t explain it, but somehow, preserving the moment only as a screenshot is less incriminating, because it seems more prank-like in that regard.
Have you really reduced your self to making fun of retards and having no sense of humor?
Exactly ,you would think you would perhaps visit an actual rl Dr. for that one.
Anyway, it`s normal. The foreskin isn`t fully retractable from birth, so this happens. Not a problem. But if anyone actually cares, ask a doctor. Not some random people on a website who may or may not have a clue.
whoever did this was awesome.