When Is This Old Gay Grandpa Gonna Learn? [Pic]

Submitted by: Fancys_Asst 7 years ago in

Forget it gramps, your obvious stab at attention-getting homosexuality is never going to stick.
There are 133 comments:
Male 77
wonder what it says on the back.
0
Reply
Male 169
@Riseagainst: Agreed. :)

Also, I fully intend to wear uni-color tracksuits and fedoras once I reach age 50.

0
Reply
Female 24
Lol! Go gramps!
0
Reply
Female 864
I`m sure it`s just a phase ,it will pass by the time he`s 90
0
Reply
Male 1,351
Is that Quiznos?

I love Quiznos.

0
Reply
Female 1,283
...
...
...?
...Pedogrampa?
0
Reply
Male 394
Homophobes are just pissed `cuz they can`t get laid.
0
Reply
Male 7
@auburnjunky not entirely true. While homosexuals would, for the most part, lay outside the gene pool, there is the care-taking of young to consider. While not in the most direct sense a matter of species propagation, this aspect plays a major role in the process as a whole, and can be performed by surrogate parents should the actual parents prove incapable or unwilling. Just my two cents on your comment.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Even if flamednight put it horribly wrong, what he said was accurate, even if he has the tact of a whore in church.
0
Reply
Male 19
FlamedNight, implying that homosexuals wish to make everyone homosexual.

This face to you as hard as I can make it: ":|"

0
Reply
Male 395
If everyone were homosexuals we wouldn`t have a future. Also: I strongly dislike gays (true definition) even if the are not homo.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
OBH. Thank you for not flying off the handle. I appreciate you countering my point with concise arguments.

Anyway, I don`t think being homosexual is wrong, or bad, or evil, or anything like that. I never said that. I never said homosexuals were a waste of space either. I said they have no purpose as far as propagation of the species goes. That`s all I said. Of course this is IAB so it got taken out of context and twisted (which is strange because it was written, not said.)

Just sayin`. I`ve got no problem with the Homos okay?

0
Reply
Male 39
Nice.
0
Reply
Female 202
@obh... I`m a little confused... you answer bumbleBB`s question about the "cause" of homosexuality by reposting your last post about overpopulation? I`m guessing you don`t have the references that bumbleBB was asking for?
0
Reply
Female 582
Argh! Cut off again

I think we`re getting close to our "limit" because the natural growth rates for many industrialized countries are stabilizing. Could we have more? Sure, but we`re recognizing now that we like the balance we`re at between population size and quality of life.

0
Reply
Female 1,112
obh... just wondering where you get your info on the "cause" of homosexuality. last I check there were some strong theories, but none of them had anything to do with genetic mutations like race differences. Maybe I`m wrong, but could you cite a reference please?
0
Reply
Female 224
yay! hahaha. excellent
0
Reply
Female 582
Argh! Cut off again

I think we`re getting close to our "limit" because the natural growth rates for many industrialized countries are stabilizing. Could we have more? Sure, but we`re recognizing now that we like the balance we`re at between population size and quality of life.

0
Reply
Female 582
Sorry -- cut off. The people who deny them that because of their homosexuality are simply prejudice.

There is a biological concept called the law of minimum. It states that the fastest a plant can grow is limited by the resource in least supply.

auburnjunkie, I can apply this to your population assertion. Our population limit is set by the resource in least supply. If we have enough energy for 300 billion people but only enough water for 20 billion, then we only have 20 billion. Even if we find ways of extending our natural resource limit, you have to use other resources (e.g. solar energy = solar panels = raw materials). The closer you get to those limits, the more thinned out those resources become and quality of life decreases.

I think we`re getting close to our "limit" because the natural growth rates for many industrialized coun

0
Reply
Female 202
@auburnjunky: Overpopulation isn`t just about the square footage a person takes up. It`s about the resources for people to survive and a planet that can continue to sustain those resources.

And go ahead and move to the Sahara or Antarctica if you think those are a reasonable places to live. Good luck finding the resources that you need to survive!

0
Reply
Female 582
The genetic basis for homosexuality is caused by mutations in DNA -- much like the cosmetic differences between races.

Whether something is a disease or disorder is in the eye of the beholder. I don`t know anyone who considers the color of your skin as a disorder.

Many genetic adaptations in any species are only harmful. But homosexuality doesn`t actually cause any health problems. Like you said, the only way it could be considered "harmful" is from an evolutionary standpoint where they are less likely to pass on those genes. If it is a method of population control -- it`s pretty clever. Gay people prefer to have sex that will never produce children, but are still capable of reproducing.

In the end, who cares if it`s a non-beneficial adaptation? They aren`t a detriment to society (any more than straight people are). Many want the same opportunities for family and career that straight people have. The people who deny them that because of their homosexuality are simply pr

0
Reply
Male 480
Yep, just a phase. He`ll grow out of it soo.....whhhaaaaaaaaaaaattt????
0
Reply
Female 158
i really wish he was my grandpa...can i buy him off ebay?

@tozfttoz

you`re using a stupid way of seeking attention. shut your mouth bigots.

@auburnjunkie
You`re dumb. Plain and simple. So let`s say a gay man invented the cure for cancer. He can`t procreate and maybe he doesn`t want kids. Is he a waste of space? No. So therefore, your arguement=FAIL.

And whoever said babies know their own orientaition... BABIES DON`T THINK ABOUT THAT YET DUMBBUTT.

oh and well said opie, well said.

0
Reply
Female 1,112
Auburnjunky the problem with your argument is that your assuming that the entire Earth is a usuable inhabitable place. The percentages you`re giving sound like one thing but mean quite another. We are using up more resources than we are replacing, we are encroaching on inhabitable land for other species. We are overpopulated.
0
Reply
Male 301
i dont like the way grandpa is looking me
0
Reply
Male 10,338
So OBH, Homosexuality is a disease like cystic fibrosis? Or is it a genetic mutation?

Just asking based on your argument.

Also, the Sahara is nearly as big as Europe, and not one person lives there. Siberia is larger than Europe, and has at most 10,000 inhabitants.

My point of all the population talk was, someone said that we were overpopulated. As a whole, the world is not, but there are certain countries are. Expanding on that, India and China aren`t overpopulated, but the cities are. There are vast expanses in both countries that have no inhabitants.

Going back to the Earth running out of resources, Why can`t we come up with alternatives to supplant the use of fossil resources. Like wind or solar?

0
Reply
Female 1
None of you have a clue what you`re talking about.
0
Reply
Female 582
MY BIOLOGY PROFESSORS, who quote scientific studies done by people who actually have PhDs in this poo, say that the carrying capacity (or sustainable population maximum) for humans is between 2 billion and 50 billion. That number may seem like a big range, but it depends on the quality of life for each person. So if there are 50 billion people on this planet, then things like food, water, gasoline, etc. are going to be severely rationed.

So do gay people serve an evolutionary function? Is homosexuality wrong? Well, what about cystic fibrosis? That doesn`t propagate our species and those damn people are so selfish for using up resources NORMAL people could use. Some of them have the nerve to never have children either.

Also, most genetic mutations in any species are not beneficial -- only a few are. Crazy thing is that most of us have a value for life that extends beyond evolutionary usefulness. It`s called being human.

0
Reply
Female 582
auburnjunky, you seriously need to educate yourself more on these issues. You`re grossly overgeneralizing homosexuals -- many of whom have children or would adopt if adoption agencies didn`t discriminate against them (either for being gay or for being unmarried and the only reason they`re not married is because the government discriminates against gay marriage).

I`d like to know where you got that 2% from because that sounds like a ton of bullpoo to me. Maybe only 2% has buildings on them, but what about the vast land used for agriculture? Or the undeveloped area that`s still owned? You can`t judge population capacity by % of the land developed. If you have 100% developed, then where do you grow food? The earth is becoming overpopulated because we`re using more resources than are available in the long term.

0
Reply
Female 77
Everything is super when you`re gay!
0
Reply
Female 206
awesome
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Hiromi, he was being sarcastic.

As far as the overpopulation argument goes, it is a fallacy.

Yes there are countries that are over populated, but the earth as a whole isn`t even close.

Just in terms of North America, 2% of this continent is developed, and 2% of that is inhabited.

As far as Earth numbers go, the population covers about 25% of LAND on earth, not including Antarctica. Overpopulated?

0
Reply
Female 1,148
We`re going extinct? I guess you forgot about overpopulated China.
0
Reply
Male 499
Yes, because the think Earth needs right now is MORE HUMANS. We are nearly going extinct and there`s not enough of us.

Just drating admit you`re an ignorant dick who doesn`t like change and is afraid of stuff that is different.

0
Reply
Female 3,574
... how does not having children improve gender disparity?
0
Reply
Female 956
aaaw I want to take him home with me!

...that sounded wrong...

0
Reply
Male 590
that old bastard sure loves roosters
0
Reply
Male 395
"How does not reproducing advance our species."

By reducing the negative effects of gender disparity.

0
Reply
Female 3,574
cute
0
Reply
Male 1,882
The mental image isn`t good at all, but at least he made me laugh before I had to throw up!
0
Reply
Male 355
old man on man sex. now thats nasty
0
Reply
Female 1,112
Who`s persecuting anyone?
0
Reply
Male 483
"How does not reproducing advance our species."

How does persecuting people for being gay advance our species?

0
Reply
Male 352
How does not reproducing advance our species.
0
Reply
Female 1,112
Heureux. I mean that simply by engaging soley in homosexual acts, according to any theories surrounding the function of sexuality, it does impede the natural desire to proliferate the species, in that it is simply impossible to concieve through same sex intercourse.

I`m not sure what I projected? I didn`t insinuate that people of any non-hetero status can`t, won`t, or shouldn`t have children. All I did was give a small insight into the biological aspect of homosexuality in terms of advancing the species.

I also included the part about it only being speculation, because I don`t have answers. I am extremely critical of my own convictions and in no way shape or form think that I can educate anyone on the subject, however, I do take offence to extremists on either side of the issue. If you don`t want to delve into the idea of "Why am I gay" I think you`re as bad as the people who think it`s "just plain wrong". What`s wrong with examination?

0
Reply
Male 2,506
lol Ollie just BARTNTT
0
Reply
Male 39
Luet_Seer...

i dont think straight people consciously "shove their sexuality in other people`s faces" by mentioning their significant other... this might just be me but I don`t find people talking about their relationships to sound like, "HEY A$$HOLE, CHECK OUT MY SEXUALITY. YEAH! THAT`S RIGHT. MY SEXUALITY IS [email protected]#%IN` SWEET."

but hey that`s just me

0
Reply
Female 45
Lucu, you may not shove it in people`s faces, but you`re completely wrong when you say that heterosexuals don`t shove it in people`s faces that they`re straight. They may not say "I`m straight!", but anytime they mention their significant other, or any other mention of liking the opposite sex, they`re broadcasting the same message. It`s obvious this is a stab at people saying that homosexuality is "just a phase." and drat you tozfttoz.
0
Reply
Male 38
homosexuality is a stupid way of seeking attention
0
Reply
Female 365
I wonder how much the budget signs company paid that old man to do that?
0
Reply
Male 15,832
I seriously doubt that this guy is anybody`s grandpa.
0
Reply
Female 176
I`m bi, but I don`t shove it in people`s faces. If you want to be treated like everyone else, first of all, act like it. Heterosexuals don`t say "Hey I`m Straight!!! Straight Pride." I`m proud to be bi, multiracial, married, and married to a Marine man, but I don`t push it on people. Damn people. Stop acting like little kids. Sheesh.
0
Reply
Female 176
lmao 80%?! That`s funny. "According to the U.S. Census Bureau 2000, 1.5% label themselves as gay. The 10% quoted is a myth. According to polls and public advocacy groups, at least 10% of the United States population labels themselves as homosexual.
Many groups sympathetic to homosexual rights say 10% of the populace is homosexual. More neutral sources speak of 3 to 5 percent. The truth may be a matter of how one defines "homosexual""
There`s the actual percentage.
0
Reply
Male 1,054
Bumble

Aptly named there.

"Homosexuality does interupt the natural desire to proliferate the species."

No. Many heterosexual have no desire to reproduce, many homosexuals do. Sexual orientation is independent of fertility and urge to reproduce.

You are trying, clearly, but still have a lot to learn, and it would help if you stop projecting heterosexist assumptions onto the lives of GLBTQ people.

"You can`t run around saying people are "homophobes" because you disagree with their arguments. "

Depends on the argument. If the `argument` is that GLBTQ people are inferior, then the person making that argument is a homophobe.

"Prentending (sic) you have the answers only makes you look foolish."

You did a great job of that for yourself.

0
Reply
Male 511
@bumbleBB cba to read all that.. ignorant? meh. gtfo ya American Reject
0
Reply
Male 999
80%? thats a little too much
0
Reply
Female 315
80% of the populace is bi or gay?

... no. I`m not sure where you got that statisic, but it`s pretty funny.

0
Reply
Female 155
coming out the closet by using a sign to the whole world?
0
Reply
Male 1,190
80% of the populace is bi or gay, deal with it
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Well said bumble. Well said.
0
Reply
Female 1,112
OK so I`ve read all these posts and come to conclusion that you`re all ignorant. You can`t run around saying people are "homophobes" because you disagree with their arguments. Homosexuality does interupt the natural desire to proliferate the species. However, there is speculation that the development of homosexuality is natural reponse to population control. The individual who said the earth is not overpopulated is wrong in the sense that while the Earth could potentially be sustained with a greater population, ecologically it was never supposed to handle the onslaught of the human boom. We are space and resource sucking monsters as far as nature is concerned. Homosexuality is not wrong, selfish, or lazy. Many homosexual couples do have children, particularily the women. There are no answers here, only speculation. Prentending you have the answers only makes you look foolish.
0
Reply
Male 9
@ Geogypsy

I think the 9 months may mean that he`s been that way since conception... he seems to be advocating that one`s sexuality is determined genetically :)

0
Reply
Male 8,300
Yes, its just a phase he`s going through. Once he meets a nice girl he can spend the rest of his life with, he`ll drop all this foolishness and ring his Dad and apologize for being so rebellious.

:-) :-P ;-)

0
Reply
Male 2,548
Hehe_ I love how one starts counting months again after a certain age.
0
Reply
Male 338
that`s gay
0
Reply
Male 44
i love how the sign is sponsored by budget sign....i would of loved to be at that meeting.."sir, me and gary have this wonderful super duper idea!" (in my crazy gay voice)
0
Reply
Female 57
Yay for gay!
0
Reply
Female 15,763
I just don`t understand why some people care so much about the genitals of my sexual partners. Geez, who`s the pervert again?
0
Reply
Male 478
*crosses fingers he`s not a pedophile too*
0
Reply
Male 928
Aw :-D
0
Reply
Female 9,572
I love this guy!
0
Reply
Male 619
I think this is just shameless promotion by the owners of Budget Signs.
0
Reply
Female 346
Lmfao, love that dude.
0
Reply
Female 3,828
awesome. excellent arguement.
0
Reply
Female 2,220
I have to say that`s an EXCELLENT point!
0
Reply
Male 2,229
The over use of the term gay in slang to denote a homosexual is becoming annoying, considering the terms meaning is happy, or to be happy.

0
Reply
Female 519
You`re right. I was wrong to fling mud at your homophobic ass. But damn let`s just say you ignited my angry spark from your first post. You call it "debating" I call it offensive. So cheerio may we meet on another day where our views don`t collide crash and burn.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Sticks and stones elle. If you cannot have a debate without lashing out and slinging mud, then don`t debate.

I plainly said he was my wife`s brother, not a friend. We are friendly true, but that wasn`t what I said. Did you read my argument?

If you are offended by what I have said, and think I am wrong, educate me.

Anyway, I am off. Good debate, but we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

0
Reply
Female 519
Elle, just so you know, when people are backed into a corner, or are being met with a challenge they cannot handle, they tend to lash out or become angry. Can you not debate without being childish, or are you just appalled by people with a differing opinion than yours?
BTW my wife`s brother is gayer than a pink jaybird, and he knows how I feel. He is not offended, and he tells me that he began to feel "gay" around 18 or 19.

No sweetie just disgusted by your attitude... Your ignorance has not backed me into any corner.. but yes you have disgusted me and angered me by saying things that would offend a lot of people I care about and with your attitude I doubt very much your "gay friend" would share such personal information..

0
Reply
Male 10,338
lol
0
Reply
Female 519
Children start having sexual (not procreation) thoughts at around 5 or 6. Masturbation begins about then. Feelings toward other humans sexually, begins sometime after puberty. That`s the popular scientific explanation.

Not true. That is a load of crap and there are plenty of cases around the world where you can see this.

0
Reply
Male 10,338
Elle, just so you know, when people are backed into a corner, or are being met with a challenge they cannot handle, they tend to lash out or become angry. Can you not debate without being childish, or are you just appalled by people with a differing opinion than yours?

BTW my wife`s brother is gayer than a pink jaybird, and he knows how I feel. He is not offended, and he tells me that he began to feel "gay" around 18 or 19.

0
Reply
Male 10,338
That`s why most kids don`t run to momma or daddy when a pedophile gets `em. It feels good and they have no clue what`s going on.
0
Reply
Female 519
I`m not a homophobe. I don`t care if someone is gay or not. I`m just saying it serves no purpose other than self gratification.

That is something a homophobe would say.

I wonder - would a gay person take offence to that statement.. Excuse me sir, because you (through no fault or control of your own) are gay serve no purpose in life and you are selfish.

Like I said, history and science goes against you.. Some of the greatest men and women and influential figures in history were gay.. it had nothing to do with what they contributed to this earth and they probably served more of a purpose than you could ever hope to achieve by producing more homophobe miscrient offspring.

0
Reply
Male 10,338
Children start having sexual (not procreation) thoughts at around 5 or 6. Masturbation begins about then. Feelings toward other humans sexually, begins sometime after puberty. That`s the popular scientific explanation.
0
Reply
Female 519
Elle, I`m saying that if I were to make a sign like that about my heterosexuality, I would do it for as long as I have had attractions to the opposite sex - after all, that is the DEFINITION of heterosexuality. I have never heard of a documented case where a baby had a sexual attraction to another baby, straight or not. Once again, I`m just being an instigator, pointing out a small syntax error in the sign - it has absolutely nothing to do with his actual orientation, just the fact that he didn`t have an orientation whatsoever until a certain age.

Erm, okay well you are the only person who would choose to do it that way.. I don`t say I have been straight for 16 and a half years and 92 days because frankly that was a random stab in the dark..

And as for sexual feelings as a baby - how do you know? Can anyone here honestly say when they had their first sexual thought? And for that matter how far back can you remember?

0
Reply
Male 10,338
I`m not a homophobe. I don`t care if someone is gay or not. I`m just saying it serves no purpose other than self gratification.

Global warming being a hoax is in all the papers and all over the internet news sites (even ones that aren`t Fox News.) Climate change is the keyword now, and it is a naturally occurring phenomenon.

0
Reply
Male 10,338
Elle, You said the earth is overpopulated, and I was countering that point.

Also, the people that are infertile are unfortunately in a bad situation. It is caused by either a disease, or a birth defect. Sucks and I feel for them.

0
Reply
Female 519
elle, the world is not dying, or is it overpopulated. There are countries that are, but the world as a whole is not. Also, global warming, and the dying earth theory, is a hoax.

Oh really? And do you have the facts to back that up or is there any point in reasoning with the ignorant homophobes of the world? Hun, I base all my stuff on science and fact and what you can see happening around you but I have a feeling you don`t so you can continue in your ignorant and highly offensive stance that any gay person is selfish and serves no purpose. History and science goes against you.

0
Reply
Male 1,406
Auburn, then I revise my statement:

If you believe that your only goal in life is to continue the evolution of the species in the way that "nature intended" (even though nature is not sentient, and evolution is just a side effect of the physical principles that govern the universe), and you also for some reason don`t care enough about your mission in life to step out of the expectations of society, you would be doing this:

Marry a woman. Have a baby with her as often as possible, producing a baby every couple of years or so. You then have to remove every single luxury from your and the children`s lives in order to keep them alive, ignoring any emotions that don`t explicitly contribute to the propagation of the species.

0
Reply
Male 2,309
I love this man. In every way possible.
0
Reply
Female 519
Quick fact (for elle). North America is only 2% developed, and only 2% of that space has people living in it. True, true.

And your point is?

0
Reply
Female 519
That being said, you can choose to help society and mankind and do what you were put on this earth to do (propagate the species), OR you can choose to be a waste of space and just satisfy yourself.

Yeah but that is saying that is what we are here to do? Its not selfish, there are many ways people can serve their purpose and it is not just to have children... Plenty of people cannot procreate.. are they selfish? No. Everyone has a purpose and it is not determined by their sexuality.

0
Reply
Male 4,680
"That being said, you can choose to help society and mankind and do what you were put on this earth to do (propagate the species), OR you can choose to be a waste of space and just satisfy yourself."
What about infertile couples then?
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Most of us do cheeseman, but we pair off because of social pressure. Nature tells men to spread seeds, but society tells us to pair off with a mate. Difference is, when we get married we slightly go against nature, but we do not interrupt the order of humankind to do so. We have babies.
0
Reply
Female 364
Aww. I like that old man.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Quick fact (for elle). North America is only 2% developed, and only 2% of that space has people living in it. True, true.
0
Reply
Male 1,406
Elle, I`m saying that if I were to make a sign like that about my heterosexuality, I would do it for as long as I have had attractions to the opposite sex - after all, that is the DEFINITION of heterosexuality. I have never heard of a documented case where a baby had a sexual attraction to another baby, straight or not. Once again, I`m just being an instigator, pointing out a small syntax error in the sign - it has absolutely nothing to do with his actual orientation, just the fact that he didn`t have an orientation whatsoever until a certain age.

Also, for the evolutionary argument: if you think the only meaning in life is to continue evolution, you should be constantly attempting to procreate while supporting every child you create, ignoring your own personal needs. For some reason I don`t see that happening.

0
Reply
Male 10,338
elle, the world is not dying, or is it overpopulated. There are countries that are, but the world as a whole is not. Also, global warming, and the dying earth theory, is a hoax.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
That being said, you can choose to help society and mankind and do what you were put on this earth to do (propagate the species), OR you can choose to be a waste of space and just satisfy yourself.
0
Reply
Female 519
Point is, we are here to procreate, and Bill and Bobby cannot do that. Neither can Tina or Tammy. They can be gay and that`s fine, but they serve no purpose whatsoever except self gratification. They can adopt and serve a purpose, but most don`t.

We are? Hmmm well thank you for clearing the meaning of life up for us.. I mean we all have theories of why we are here and our purpose but apparently it is just to make babies... in a world that is dying... and is over populated... Yeah okay then.

0
Reply
Female 519
Take Elton John and George Michael, both men who attempted to be straight until they eventually "came out" but they were both always gay...
0
Reply
Female 82
Nucleartoast, It`s MULES that are sterile, Donkeys can still breed. Mules are the offspring of a horse and a donkey. But other then that little accident I do agree with you. :)
0
Reply
Male 10,338
nucleartoast, donkeys are not sterile, mules are. I`ll give you the benefit of the doubt though and say this. MULES are the mutant, dead end offspring of horses and donkeys. Farmers could use donkeys, but mules are cheaper.

Point is, we are here to procreate, and Bill and Bobby cannot do that. Neither can Tina or Tammy. They can be gay and that`s fine, but they serve no purpose whatsoever except self gratification. They can adopt and serve a purpose, but most don`t.

0
Reply
Female 519
I was pointing out an issue in the sign - your sexual orientation iis something that MUST emerge over time, other wise babies would be attempting to screw each other; sexual orientation might be latently described in genes, but it is nonsensical to say that someone is gay (instead of LATENTLY gay) when they have no attraction to other creatures. This applies to straight people to; my argument is simply semantics. I do not think being gay is a choice, just like how I don`t think being straight is a choice, or being bisexual, or being a pedophile.

Fair enough but you don`t say you were straight from a certain point of time. You have never had reason to believe otherwise so You will say you were straight from the duration of your life not when you first realised you were straight.. the same with being gay.. this guy says he realised and recognised he was gay from the very start he is not going to begin from when he first had a sexual thought towards the same sex.

0
Reply
Male 1,406
I was pointing out an issue in the sign - your sexual orientation iis something that MUST emerge over time, other wise babies would be attempting to screw each other; sexual orientation might be latently described in genes, but it is nonsensical to say that someone is gay (instead of LATENTLY gay) when they have no attraction to other creatures. This applies to straight people to; my argument is simply semantics. I do not think being gay is a choice, just like how I don`t think being straight is a choice, or being bisexual, or being a pedophile.
0
Reply
Female 519
What`s your source?

Erm scientific studies in which they tried to decipher if being gay was environmental/genes/hormonal etc If you are gay then you would be gay from the beginning... Yes you will not realise sexual thoughts straight away but no child does whether straight or gay or transgender etc etc etc... Its a state of mind.. its chromosomes and its not something anyone can predict or change.

0
Reply
Female 519
Some really bloody ignorant morons in here..
The same idiots that say being Gay is a choice..

"Coming out" is when you choose to openly acknowledge to society/family/friends that you are gay for those who seem to misunderstand the concept.

0
Reply
Female 257
Go gramps; even animals can be gay sometimes, just because it doesn`t serve an evolutionary purpose doesn`t mean it`s wrong. Donkeys are sterile yet they exist, they may not make other baby donkeys but they serve a purpose on a farm. So why don`t all the internet scientists that think they`re so intelligent for knowing a scientific THEORY go get a life.
0
Reply
Male 3,255
"Zerocycle, evolution doesn`t have a direction."

Yea, it does. It`s direction is survival of the species. Two dudes having sex in no way helps the species survive. Babies do that.

Sitting on my ass playing video games serves no evolutionary purpose, but it`s not bad that I do that.

0
Reply
Male 1,297
welp, we can take pleasure in knowing that sexually ignorant people will never have as rich a sex life as the rest of us!
0
Reply
Female 265
Zerocycle, evolution doesn`t have a direction. Or a purpose. It`s not like some force thinks "Oh, this looks like it`ll help the species" and that`s what gets selected for. It`s a lot more complicated than that.
0
Reply
Male 317
tainteddeity
Male, 13-17, Europe
216 Posts

They call it `coming out` and not `becoming gay` because it`s always there.
----------------------------------------
What`s your source?

0
Reply
Male 3,255
Homosexuality serves absolutely ZERO evolutionary function. Therefore, it is WRONG. Not wrong as in bad, but wrong as in 2 + 2 doesn`t = 12.

However, homosexuality harms absolutely no one. Therefore, bone whatever you want and haters can go drat themselves.

0
Reply
Male 848
You know I`m impressed with the responses.
Go you, i-am-bored people.
0
Reply
Female 265
But DID you choose to pursue women? Or was it just like "oh hey that looks nice"

Because that`s the idea we`re getting at here. No one CHOOSES what they`re attracted to.

0
Reply
Male 10,338
I chose to be straight when I chose to pursue women and not men. Before that, I don`t think it`s possible to put a label on what I was thinking, because I didn`t think about it.
0
Reply
Female 265
CheeseMan1: So when did you choose to be straight?
0
Reply
Male 10,338
All children are nothing UNTIL they have the thoughts.
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Exactly poonhat. You are not gay until you discover you are.
0
Reply
Male 848
Cheeseman1:
They don`t, they don`t have to.
Being straight, gay or anything in between isn`t just about sex.
Why do you assume all children are straight if they aren`t having sexual thoughts?
0
Reply
Male 10,338
Coming out, by the way, is when you decide to be gay, but hide it, then admit it to straight people later.
0
Reply
Male 194
Cheeseman obviously doesn`t understand;
did you think about boning women right away?
No.
You discovered these thoughts.
Just as gay people often discover their sexuality.
derp
0
Reply
Male 10,338
He must be in his 90`s because you usually don`t make the decision to be gay until your teens or twenties.
0
Reply
Male 13,630
tainteddeity - Word!
0
Reply
Male 13,630
Wooooooooooooooo, go old timer!!!!
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Yeah its still a phase :)
0
Reply
Male 1,406
Sorry Tainted, I didn`t know people have sexual thoughts when they are a week old.
0
Reply
Male 848
Cheeseman1:
If you`re gay, you`re gay. That`s how it works. They call it `coming out` and not `becoming gay` because it`s always there.
0
Reply
Male 9,305
Go gramps. XD
0
Reply
Male 848
I like this.
0
Reply
Male 1,406
He was gay as soon as he came out of the womb? Wow, I knew kids were exposed to sex early, but this is more than I ever imagined!
0
Reply
Female 1,780
Link: When Is This Old Gay Grandpa Gonna Learn? [Pic] [Rate Link] - Forget it gramps, your obvious stab at attention-getting homosexuality is never going to stick.
0
Reply