Mom Who Cussed Out Principal Faces Charges

Submitted by: PinkAndGreen 7 years ago in

Her kid was wearing sweats at school and got pantsed. Then a school official asked a thong-related question. Then BOOM!
There are 90 comments:
Female 109
go Mom! that was the thong question to ask...and rlly creepy!
i wonder how he phrased it CHOMO ALERT!!!
)-|

0
Reply
Female 365
I`m sorry but some principals NEED to be cussed out.
0
Reply
Male 194
that superintendent is a real Arse. that was kinda a pedo thing to ask. she should press charges
0
Reply
Male 3,431
Yeah I`d need to know what the Superintendent was wearing, and I`d give his stodgy old ass a wedgie to find out!
0
Reply
Female 2,695
@leesah she wasn`t so much upset about her daughter getting pantsed, more about the fact that the principal asked if the kid was wearing a thong which is a rather unnecessary and inappropriate thing to ask
0
Reply
Female 77
I love that the guy who pantsed the girl has to get counseling now.
Maybe a bit of an overreaction.
0
Reply
Female 36
that`s my news channel =D
sorry..that was random. but they were all over-reacting XD
0
Reply
Male 1,429
hell, my mom hauled off and punch my principal in grade 4 for calling me an idiot. The world is full of pussies now.
0
Reply
Female 8
I don`t know a mother who wouldn`t cuss at the principal.
I think it is very bad timing on his part because he knew she was upset and a bit stressed out at this whole thing and then to ask--invasive questions. I don`t see why it matters as to what she was wearing because a thong still covers it all unless she was bending over and showing it off.(I did read the other comments and unless the mother said she would file a suit against the boy and the school it doesn`t matter. Along with a lawyer should be asking not the principal) I get the suspension for the act but it should be maybe a day or a week of detention, but consoling is stupid. Maybe have the boy hear why it is okay for him to pants his male friends but not females, same reason boys can`t hit girls. You just don`t do it, you`ll get into trouble and when you are older it goes from he hit a girl to battery charges. He pants me to he tried to rape me.
0
Reply
Female 1,566
This mom CURSED at the PRINCIPAL. GASP.

That reporter was a taaaaaad over-dramatic. But yeah, talk about mountain out of a molehill. The kid that did it should have gotten an ISS or whatever and it should have been done with. Nobody is THAT psychologically scarred from getting pantsed that their mothers have to run in screaming about sexual harassment workshops.

0
Reply
Female 55
I don`t blame her for cussing out the principle. It`s not her fault he`s such a puss. Maybe I could understand if there were other kids around when she flipped out, but still... B-|
0
Reply
Male 287
Look at the reporter`s face when she says "this mom cursed at the principal." It`s as if the mother raped the guy`s family with a nine foot strapon then burned his entire hometown to the ground. When did swearing at someone become such a huge crime? Get a grip, America.

Unrealated, but the Super looks like Mel Brooks.

0
Reply
Male 660
Haven`t thongs been replaced by Brazilian cut underwear these days? That girl should get wid it!
0
Reply
Male 703
ha. i caught megan mcgann with the ol sweatpantsing and she wasnt wearing any underwear. she had a really cute vagina
0
Reply
Male 130
The principle should`ve acted smarter than that and not ask such ambiguous questions. What a drating moron, I hope he dies of ass cancer.
0
Reply
Female 582
@ sourkrauter

0
Reply
Female 168
This kinda sounds like if she were wearing a thong, then it`s justified and her fault. Like the way douchebags will claim "she was just asking to get raped".

The point was the boy did this and it`s sexual harassment. A lawsuit SHOULD have followed and then sued the school for inappropriate conduct. The thong question was completely irrelevant to "what part of her was exposed".

0
Reply
Female 1,112
skine your example is irrelevant, because your suggesting a violent retaliation against an innocent party would be wrong. In this case, though the mother acted inappropriately to a degree, it was in no way threatening the safety of the principle. The principle, in my opinion was not a totally innocent party, in that he asked an inappropriate question to an already agitated mother. The later part of this is of course a subjective opinion.
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Her mistake was in taking this up with the school. She should have filed a criminal complaint with the police for sexual assault, which, BTW, she still can.
0
Reply
Male 719
"i think the mom is right, just because she said some choice words isnt disorderly conduct!"

So somebody kills your mother. At a later date (before the trial). You follow this by beating up a policeman for not doing a good enough job.

Are you punishable for assault and battery, or does the fact that your mother was just killed make it okay?

Do you not remember preschool when you got into trouble, and used the excuse "but he did it first!"?

0
Reply
Male 3,915
what an non-nice individual....wait...guys are allowed to pull down girls` pants? AND NO ONE TOLD ME? poo....and here i am about to leave high school....
0
Reply
Male 13
i think the mom is right, just because she said some choice words isnt disorderly conduct! If this was to go to court then if i were her i would take it as far as it goes to be proven right!
0
Reply
Male 2,690
Poor girl.
0
Reply
Male 16
i would just pay another boy to stomp the offenders ass and be done with it.
0
Reply
Male 894
sexual harassment *dun dun* panda
0
Reply
Female 3,828
Sound wasnt very loud on this vid, and i dont think its my computer.

and like the principal could have done anything anywayÉ its between students.

0
Reply
Male 719
The thing is that the kid was wrong, but that is a completely separate issue.

The real issue here is that the mother was wrong, but she thinks that her "wrongness" was justified.

0
Reply
Male 197
Well??? Was she wearing a thong?!
JK JK JK Don`t get your panties in a knot!
Pun intended.
0
Reply
Male 719
What I learned by playing hockey:

The initial infraction is caught 85% of the time.
The retaliation is caught 95% of the time.

Basically, it`s stupid to do something illegal in order to call attention to something else that is illegal. In most cases, you fail to prove that the other thing is illegal, and end up getting caught yourself.

0
Reply
Female 1,112
"THE QUESTION ABOUT THE THONG WAS ASKED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DECIDING HOW BADLY TO PUNISH THE KID WHO WAS SUSPENDED."

I fail to see how this would dictate how badly the kid was punished. The kid likely didn`t know what kind of underwear she was wearing, and it doesn`t change what his intention was. Nothing suggested that any legal documentation was made, and beyond the fact that her pants were pulled down, it really shouldn`t matter what the type of underwear she was wearing. Point being, it has nothing to do with the action.

0
Reply
Male 1,089
well ive pretty much been in this same situation as the guy minus the getting caught. after the girl got my boxers i got her panties, atleast she was hot. action=reaction, boys will be boys.
0
Reply
Male 4,014
"He was asking about the thong to infer she`s a slut and it`s her fault she was pants."

Thats how this ONE SIDED report wants you to believe, but again, a governmental entitry, acting in loco parentis, has to document an incident like this. If she WAS wearing a thong, even more of her body was exposed.

THE QUESTION ABOUT THE THONG WAS ASKED FOR THE PURPOSE OF DECIDING HOW BADLY TO PUNISH THE KID WHO WAS SUSPENDED. Jeeze, don`t believe everything the media feeds you folks.

0
Reply
Male 4,014
DON`T BE SO REACTIONARY PEOPLE. The thong question HAD to be asked for legal reasons. A child being exposed in school raises legal questions - you have to know what happened, the school has to record the FACTS.

Entirely appropriate - I would have had to ask if I was the school`s lawyer. He wasn`t asking out of perversion.

THE KID WHO PULLED DOWN THE KIDS PANTS WAS SUSPENDED - as he should.

And let me tell you right now THIS LADY IS FACING DISORDERLY CONDUCT CHARGES NOT BECAUSE OF A SWEAR WORD, BUT FOR GETTING DISORDERLY. Period. They don`t say she was charged for swearing - she probably flipped out and had the cops called on her.

0
Reply
Female 236
He was asking about the thong to infer she`s a slut and it`s her fault she was pants. Boys will be boys you know?

Principals and teachers don`t care if your child is bullied, attacked, or sexually harassed at school. They prefer to pretend they saw/heard nothing and avoid the matter all together.

0
Reply
Male 1,129
What state was this in? in Cali there would be a mean lawsuit against that school
0
Reply
Male 13
What ever happened to freedom of speech? This is ridiculous and so is the very concept of curse words in general. There is no such thing as a bad word and anyone who believes otherwise has been brainwashed.
0
Reply
Female 196
I feel like it was inappropriate for the principal to ask about the thong. That`s ridiculous.
0
Reply
Male 1,590
"This remind anyone else of `Pants on the ground, Pants on the ground, lookin like a foo` wit yo pants on the ground.`"

That`s a new one to me.

0
Reply
Female 291
Man, ANY guy does that to my kid...... any guy asks wtf my kids wearing under her clothes, they are gettin knocked out. Simple as that.

0
Reply
Male 56
Hah, if I were a father and that guy asked if my daughter was wearing a thong I would have gotten arrested for assault, no doubt. What a faggot. Why the mother is in trouble and not the dumb ass male kid or the creeper principal is beyond me.

Oh yeah. We live in a police state that`s why. Totally forgot.

0
Reply
Female 3,598
LtFurpie
Male, 30-39, Eastern US
214 Posts Monday, January 18, 2010 12:48:21 PM
Nowdays, according to muslim beliefs, the girl must marry the 14 year old that pantsed her. Otherwise she should be stoned to death.

oh wow... great comment. made me laugh a whole lot.

0
Reply
Male 2,579
Once again... America is becoming a police state. Protecting the guilty, punishing the innocent.
0
Reply
Male 156
This remind anyone else of `Pants on the ground, Pants on the ground, lookin like a foo` wit yo pants on the ground.`
0
Reply
Male 999
lol counseling for pulling someones pants down?
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Ahh, the old pull-down-her-pants bit. :D Classic.

Anyway, fox sucks, and it shows even in a mundane, almost boring story like this...

0
Reply
Female 1,112
What that kid did was technically battery, and her underwear type had no bearing on the intention of the idividual who did it to her. Unless they were trying to prove that she had pulled her pants down and commited indecent exposure, or this had actually reached a court level and reparations were being awarded on the grounds of emotional turmoil, her underwear were of no consequence. This guy should be reprimanded, not the mother.
0
Reply
Male 71
AMERICA! Taking away your freedoms, one amendment at a time!
0
Reply
Male 504
drat Fox News. Saw that didn`t even watch it.
0
Reply
Female 238
Fox can eat poo and explode.
0
Reply
Male 25
shwamp
0
Reply
Male 678
Norts that`s hilarious.... looking like a fooo wit yo pants on the ground.
0
Reply
Male 126
what a pedo....
0
Reply
Male 1,929
Much ado about nothing.
0
Reply
Female 850
The principle is a perv. He did not have to ask if she was wearing a thong...
0
Reply
Female 169
@cobrakiller I thought the same thing especially when he said "I `HAD` to kno what body parts were exposed"....im like wtf???
0
Reply
Female 198
lol @ pants on the ground comment. My first thought exactly.
0
Reply
Male 612
bunny did you just "lmao" at your own comment?
is that the internet equivalent of someone laughing at their own joke?

its not like a teacher or adult pantsed her, it was a student so punish him and let it be, because its just a joke and its still as funny as it was 12 years ago.

0
Reply
Male 7,611
why would you ask that question? he was just a perv who wanted to picture it, you could tell by the look on his face as she asked him about it.
0
Reply
Male 730
Haha good one Lizzlee
0
Reply
Male 486
Pants on the ground! Pants on the ground!
0
Reply
Male 1,013
Nowdays, according to muslim beliefs, the girl must marry the 14 year old that pantsed her. Otherwise she should be stoned to death.
0
Reply
Female 5,222
what was revealed? what a dick! it doesnt matter what was revealed. a child pants were pulled down. If it were me I probably would of punched that dude in the face. Then take his pants and reveal his thong to the whole school lmao
0
Reply
Female 1,077
@Zerocyde
i`m totally for equality for everyone, and i think separating someone for their gender is retarded, but in a scenario where the human body is involved it kinda has to be different. not to mention, based on the interview it seems like the kid was bullying a lot of other kids. even if a male friend of mine pants`d me (it`s happened) it wouldn`t really bother me. but i`ve had boys tug my clothes up/off before in a malicious way and i have to say it`s completely degrading and humiliating.
0
Reply
Male 3,255
@Vindictive

Ohh snap, didn`t even read that it was a chick. I still believe in "good fun is good fun" but maybe the pantsing thing does work a bit differently for chicks.

0
Reply
Male 931
It`d have been hilarious if anyone did that when i was at school...because 9 time out of 10 the guy who pantsed would probably get the s&$t beat out of him. Our school wasn`t that friendly. :\
0
Reply
Female 2
Pants on the ground, pants on the ground! Lookin` like a fool with your pants on the ground!!
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Tis a little daking that should not have happened but to question the undergarments that are worn and be unhappy over the answer is retarted! WHen the world is trying to control you this much, the act of free speech and free expressions is lost in translation!
0
Reply
Male 4,680
"they should act appropriately"
Oh he can talk :l
0
Reply
Female 1,077
@zerocyde
i think it`s different if it`s a girl being pants`d by a guy. if a female friend did that to me, i`d be embarrassed but laugh. if i was a guy and a guy did it to me, same thing. if a boy did that to me, and wasn`t a friend (as it seems to be here) i`d be furious. nobody has a right to even partially undress you in public.
0
Reply
Male 695
Man, there`s alot of retards in the world. The kid who pulled down her pants is now undergoing counceling? WTF??? In a couple of years every american will have a government official to move their feet for them if they have to go somewhere...
0
Reply
Male 1,182
lmao

"oh really what kind of panties was she wearing"

0
Reply
Female 876
WHOA! He asked if she was wearing a thong?! He should be fired and investigated. That is NOT appropriate. What a pig!
0
Reply
Male 3,255
What the drat is so bad about getting pantsed you pussies? Good fun is good fun. Especially if you wear grown up underwear then its even less of a big deal.

Whiney emo bitches: *get pantsed* YOOOOU GUIIIIIIES! KNOCK IT OOOOOOF! IM TELLING THE COOOOOOPS!

Non-retard pussy: *get pantsed* lol! drater! *attempt to get revenge with the whip end of a wet towel, also, next day, hide behind the wall and try to get revenge with a de-pantsing of your own*

0
Reply
Male 1,666
Everybody involved with this is an idiot. The legal system in this country is also filled with idiots.
0
Reply
Male 683
"Kids are still pantsing each other...?"

Yeah, i`ve seen/heard of it people getting completely pantsed (pants and unders) multiple times in gym, nothing ever gets done about it though oddly enough. My school even has security cameras... nice job administration.

0
Reply
Male 1,931
His excuse for asking if she was wearing a thong, "Had to find out what parts where revealed". Seriously? For drats sake, that superintendent needs to be the one in jail for sexual harassment.
0
Reply
Male 901
He asked her what kind of underwear she was wearing? That is APPROPRIATE!? What does it matter what body parts were exposed?
0
Reply
Male 964
Where i`m from pants are underwear so i thought this kid got her underwater taken off her...
0
Reply
Male 3,842
On the one hand, you have a six-year-old first grade boy suspended from school for sexual harassment because he kissed a little girl on the cheek. Then you have this...

I hate to take the Mom`s side because she is obviously a lunatic who didn`t handle it well, but for a male student to pull down a girl`s sweatpants during gym (when sweatpants are required and students are not allowed to wear any other type of pants) is blatant sexual harassment, and I don`t see why the superintendent needs to ascertain what kind of underwear the girl was wearing. He claims he needs to know what body parts were revealed. Why? What difference does it make?

0
Reply
Female 15,763
I guess not everything changes from generation to generation.
0
Reply
Male 45
"Kids are still pantsing each other...?"
Oh yes it`s still a big thing in like 7th and 8th grade.
0
Reply
Female 15,763
Kids are still pantsing each other...?
0
Reply
Male 45
"Was your daughter wearing a thong?"
"WHERE THE HELL DO YOU GET OFF?!"
"Your daughter obviously"
0
Reply
Male 3,369
WTF has it got to do with him what underwear she`s wearing?


0
Reply
Female 519
What kind of world are we living in where you can`t even scream obsanity at the principal of your child.. sheesh...
0
Reply
Male 221
Seriously, i don`t understand American news. Why would you want to watch this? Why did this even happen? Just take a joke, get on with it and stfu.
0
Reply
Female 999
This seems like one of those crazy moms who are just never happy. They complied with all of her demands and she still went all bat poo on them.
0
Reply
Male 1,718
get over it
0
Reply
Male 171
Why do some people have to go batpoo crazy over the smallest things?
0
Reply
Female 917
Link: Mom Who Cussed Out Principal Faces Charges [Rate Link] - Her kid was wearing sweats at school and got pantsed. Then a school official asked a thong-related question. Then BOOM!
0
Reply