The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 45    Average: 3.3/5]
80 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 21507
Rating: 3.3
Category:
Date: 01/31/10 11:33 AM

80 Responses to Australian Censorship Is Getting Ridiculous

  1. Profile photo of jgl2832
    jgl2832 Male 18-29
    3 posts
    January 30, 2010 at 2:13 pm
    Link: Australian Censorship Is Getting Ridiculous - An article about Australia banning small breasts. Thoughts?
  2. Profile photo of lucid676
    lucid676 Male 18-29
    64 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:38 am
    well if Australia is going to ban small breasts does that mean they are going to publicly fund implants?
  3. Profile photo of firetiger16
    firetiger16 Female 18-29
    362 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:40 am
    *beeeeeeeep*
  4. Profile photo of AndelleRae
    AndelleRae Female 18-29
    837 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:43 am
    This reminds me of David Firth`s cartoon The Child that Smelt Funny. Also, to quote my best friend, "I`m sorry, I have small boobs, and I look NOTHING like a child." I`m kind of glad I don`t live in Australia. Between crazy bans and spiders the size of friggin dinner plates, I`ll probably not be visiting anytime soon.
  5. Profile photo of wateva_x
    wateva_x Female 13-17
    691 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:48 am
    Pay for the girls implants then. To some of them, that is their income. And now you`ve ruined it. Way to go Australia.
  6. Profile photo of videogamer
    videogamer Male 18-29
    3016 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:53 am
    I`ve heard about this, and it`s f*cking stupid.
  7. Profile photo of Molehouse
    Molehouse Male 13-17
    303 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:53 am
    If anyone is found with illegal small boob porn they kick them up the ass with a giant boot.
  8. Profile photo of Nurcowski
    Nurcowski Male 18-29
    264 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:12 pm
    An entire generation of Aussie`s craving small bewbs... a frightening notion
  9. Profile photo of yerfdog666
    yerfdog666 Male 18-29
    11 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:14 pm
    I think that`s just putting even more of an unrealistic ideal on women than already is. "Women with small breasts aren`t really women, and shouldn`t be shown in any media form", i mean come on, encourage diversity don`t censor it
  10. Profile photo of Seastone
    Seastone Female 18-29
    612 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:17 pm
    Didn`t Australia also ban Santas from saying "ho, ho, ho" and require them to say "ha, ha,ha" a few years ago?
  11. Profile photo of AppleBlue
    AppleBlue Female 18-29
    119 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:21 pm
    Firstly half of that is lies, our internet is not more heavily controlled that china, our government doesn’t have that kind of power, mainly because we have independent companies supplying our internet, where as in china it is state controlled.

    Secondly, everywhere in that article it says "Australia" it should say "Australian government" because the views of the government are not the views and opinions of the entire country and I’d thank them for realising that.

  12. Profile photo of SilentFray
    SilentFray Female 18-29
    678 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:22 pm
    At leasst you`re not banning dictionaries that defined oral sex.

    But seriously, censorship is a joke. I think it makes people want it that much more.

  13. Profile photo of techgeek07
    techgeek07 Male 30-39
    2593 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:25 pm
    IMO Australia has been heading down the wrong way for years in this department. I can`t believe the people are accepting their country being turned into a nanny state
  14. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:25 pm
    MY ITTY BITTY TITTIES DO NOT APPROVE.

    No seriously I feel pretty dismal about this. :\

  15. Profile photo of 5Cats
    5Cats Male 50-59
    32794 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:28 pm
    Censorship = Obcenity
  16. Profile photo of IkeRay
    IkeRay Male 18-29
    2704 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:29 pm
    I like the "age on video games" but the "ban on small breast porn" is pretty out there.

    as someone said on the page - what about men.

    my solution, anything under 7" will be considered too small. if you thought porn was fake enough already, be prepared for a whole lot of unreal sized penii and breastesses

  17. Profile photo of The_Garuness
    The_Garuness Male 18-29
    931 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:30 pm
    Head, meet desk. Please get acquainted. *THUD THUD THUD THUD THUD THUD*
    Once again a case of people with paedophillia issues deflecting it onto something to make them look morally superior.
  18. Profile photo of IkeRay
    IkeRay Male 18-29
    2704 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:30 pm
    "Secondly, everywhere in that article it says "Australia" it should say "Australian government" because the views of the government are not the views and opinions of the entire country and I’d thank them for realising that."

    good job with democracy down there...if you`re representatives aren`t representing your views why are they still in office?

  19. Profile photo of AppleBlue
    AppleBlue Female 18-29
    119 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:30 pm
    it isn`t actually a ban on small breasts in porn, it is a ban on "just legal" porn with 18 yrolds who look younger, which is marketed towards pedophiles.

    could everyone stop jumping to extreme conclusions when they don`t know anything?

  20. Profile photo of AppleBlue
    AppleBlue Female 18-29
    119 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:32 pm
    @ IkeRay Obama represent the views of everyone in America?
  21. Profile photo of GTrain
    GTrain Male 18-29
    166 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:33 pm
    Who designates what is small and what isn`t? I`m pretty sure this whole thing is garbage. There`s no names. No quotes. No sources. My roommate is the editor for the biggest selling `boobs out` magazine in Australia. And he`s heard nothing about this. And he should know. He`s a massive dirtbag!
  22. Profile photo of GTrain
    GTrain Male 18-29
    166 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:34 pm
    Furthermore, porn rules.
  23. Profile photo of StarDagger
    StarDagger Male 40-49
    1190 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:35 pm
    this is what happens when you allow fundamentalists to control areas of govt.

    Australia is self-marginalizing into a pariah state.

    In addition they will lose millions in tourism dollars.

  24. Profile photo of Nidonemo
    Nidonemo Male 18-29
    9308 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:40 pm
    Yeah you guys need to revolt. Like, right NOW.
  25. Profile photo of tattoosbywil
    tattoosbywil Male 18-29
    21 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:45 pm
    damn it, now I want some jellybeans . . .
  26. Profile photo of Rick_S
    Rick_S Male 40-49
    3282 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 12:54 pm
    This reminds me of a Law and Order: SVU episode where a convicted pedophile/child molester was released from prison. There was a website that specialized in girls 18+ who looked like they were 8+ would pose naked. Technically NOT child porn, but they got him off the sex offender list on their mailing list, and wouldn`t remove him, even when he asked. When he molested and killed a kid, they arrested the operator of the website and sent him to prison for inciting the guy to commit the crime.
  27. Profile photo of ElDavo
    ElDavo Male 18-29
    2149 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:01 pm
    AppleBlue: How is reading and citing information from an article considered jumping to conclusions? If the article is wrong, that`s fine, but don`t make outrageous claims about US because of it.
  28. Profile photo of octobers
    octobers Male 18-29
    40 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:02 pm
    What the hell is JGlevine.com and why should I believe something written on his obscure blog? When you go to the "about me" section of the site, it just says "Coming soon!"
  29. Profile photo of BlankTom
    BlankTom Male 30-39
    1674 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:03 pm
    does anyone have a link to a legitimate source, not just someone`s blog.
  30. Profile photo of pete1061
    pete1061 Male 40-49
    20 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:13 pm
    Not cool at all. Women with small breasts need love too. Furthermore, if the woman is old enough, what doe sit matter how old she looks? A ban on porn with women who LOOK under 18 is in the realm of thought crime.

    Whats next? A man`s 30 year old wife wears pigtails in public and he gets arrested?

    And BTW there is a huge difference between underage teens and actual children. Laws around the world don`t seem to understand that.

  31. Profile photo of AppleBlue
    AppleBlue Female 18-29
    119 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:14 pm
    @ElDavo I’m very sorry if I gave offence, please point out to me were I made outrages claims about the US and I’m submit further apologies.
  32. Profile photo of Jasonbobdude
    Jasonbobdude Male 18-29
    1598 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:14 pm
    I feel bad for all the Australian fans of Lucky Star.
  33. Profile photo of AppleBlue
    AppleBlue Female 18-29
    119 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:16 pm
    http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/29/has-...

    this is al i could find BlankTom

  34. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7468 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:39 pm
    sucks for the aussies, if they are into that.
  35. Profile photo of GothicQueen
    GothicQueen Male 13-17
    4376 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:39 pm
    Wow...that is plain ludicrous. I guess all my guy friends are pedophiles though since they prefer dating women with smaller breasts. OH SNAP.
  36. Profile photo of jgl2832
    jgl2832 Male 18-29
    3 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:52 pm
    This is the source, and it`s linked to on the top of the article
    http://guyism.com/2010/01/australia-bans...
  37. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:57 pm
    everybody needs love,
  38. Profile photo of Vindictive
    Vindictive Female 18-29
    1077 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 1:58 pm
    i guess i can`t go to australia then.
  39. Profile photo of RepostPolice
    RepostPolice Male 13-17
    189 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 2:23 pm
    OOh, I saw this on AOTS a few nights ago.
  40. Profile photo of your0mom
    your0mom Male 13-17
    374 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 2:37 pm
    wow. my low respect (for the racist) Aussies has lowered even more
  41. Profile photo of Moneo
    Moneo Female 13-17
    169 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 3:07 pm
    Its so sad to see this happen, when i have this kind of affection to Aussieland :c
  42. Profile photo of Matteress
    Matteress Male 13-17
    14 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 3:20 pm
    How can anyone think this is real? Its on a blog not in a legit newspaper, its obviously faked. It would be impossible to enforce this law. I live in australia i can access any site i choose. Only internet censorship here is that on the computers at schools, or the parental controlled censorship programs
  43. Profile photo of sukitjeezus
    sukitjeezus Female 18-29
    134 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 3:28 pm
    "How can anyone think this is real? Its on a blog not in a legit newspaper, its obviously faked. It would be impossible to enforce this law. I live in australia i can access any site i choose. Only internet censorship here is that on the computers at schools, or the parental controlled censorship programs"

    Have you ever stopped to think if the government is making you think this way? Believe it or not; everywhere else in the world tin foil hats are not considered a standard accessory.

  44. Profile photo of LandoGriffin
    LandoGriffin Male 30-39
    3844 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 3:33 pm
    I think the intention is that porn actresses who dress up and pretend to be little girls are objectionable, even if those actresses are adults, because they are creating a fictional storyline involving sex with underage children.

    However, I think the person who wrote this article is (rightfully) opposed to censorship and so he put a spin on it to make it seem unreasonable. He probably took the most insane sounding quote and made it seem like that was the whole story.

    I give Australia the benefit of the doubt because everyone I know from Australia is really cool for the most part.

  45. Profile photo of Matteress
    Matteress Male 13-17
    14 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 3:37 pm
    "Have you ever stopped to think if the government is making you think this way? Believe it or not; everywhere else in the world tin foil hats are not considered a standard accessory."

    Damn that government tricking me into thinking i can see that porn site when infact its a site that just looks exactly the same but its fake. Tin foil hats arent standard they just look cool

  46. Profile photo of Keitarohusky
    Keitarohusky Male 13-17
    131 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 4:07 pm
    "How can anyone think this is real? Its on a blog not in a legit newspaper, its obviously faked. It would be impossible to enforce this law. I live in australia i can access any site i choose. Only internet censorship here is that on the computers at schools, or the parental controlled censorship programs"

    Pay more attention to whats going on, this stuff if legit and it will most likely go through (Depends on opinion). It`s not fake, google `the blacklist Australia porn` in keywords and you will find many more writings on the topic. I feel sad that you have not caught up on all this.

    Email me for the blacklist if you wish (That`s apparently not real according to the government.)

  47. Profile photo of vitaliy
    vitaliy Male 18-29
    1668 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 4:28 pm
    WTF Australia? Way to screw up.
  48. Profile photo of Matteress
    Matteress Male 13-17
    14 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 5:35 pm
    Pay more attention to whats going on, this stuff if legit and it will most likely go through (Depends on opinion). It`s not fake, google `the blacklist Australia porn` in keywords and you will find many more writings on the topic. I feel sad that you have not caught up on all this.

    Read the first line of the `article`, it says it has already happened, it also goes on to explain that we have a nation-wide ban on sites the government deems inapporiate(2nd paragraph). Its true there is a proposal for internet censorship (no it wont go through election is coming up) and it is a stupid idea anyway. I suggest you go to google and type in the words `small boobs` and see what comes up, im sure youll find that the sites arent blocked at all. I feel sad that you dont actually read the blog that you are trying to say is real before commenting about it.
  49. Profile photo of SaltyVarnish
    SaltyVarnish Male 18-29
    678 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 5:50 pm
    Australia is still better than America!
  50. Profile photo of Boadicea
    Boadicea Female 18-29
    1677 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 5:53 pm
    Get a life SaltyVarnis. Your inferiority complex is showing.
  51. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8306 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 5:55 pm
    > If a site has material on it which would be rated ‘18+’ then it is not allowed on the web. If it’s hosted in Australia, it is issued a federal order to shut down, and if it is hosted outside Australia, it is added to the countries black list

    Basically that whole article was over-hyped bullpoop and exaggeration. Despite working in an Online Access Centre AND being a net nerd, I have *NEVER* seen the government`s blackban page pop up. Ever. Nor have I ever met anyone who has. So sure, in theory the government blocks a lot of sites; but in practice, you have to ask yourself what sort of sick mofo sites they are, if no-one you ever heard of has ever been blocked.

  52. Profile photo of Paaahka
    Paaahka Female 13-17
    125 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 5:58 pm
    My future is looking bleak.
  53. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8306 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 5:58 pm
    > Keitarohusky
    > Pay more attention to whats going on, this stuff if legit and it will most likely go through

    It WENT through, 2 years ago. Although it is constantly being refined and adjusted, you`ve been filtered by the govt all that time. The fact that you didn`t even know you were being filtered means they`re doing it right, IMHO.

  54. Profile photo of ElSombrero
    ElSombrero Male 13-17
    716 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 6:08 pm
    I think that violates some universal rights actually
  55. Profile photo of Nidonemo
    Nidonemo Male 18-29
    9308 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 6:19 pm
    "WTF Australia? Way to screw up."

    Vit, we have problems of our own too. We still need to pay attention to the bills that get voted on in our country, and revive our constitutional rights that people seem to be forgetting.

    Aussies, the fact that you have internet censorship in the first place is terrible. I`m very sorry to see that. :(

  56. Profile photo of Matteress
    Matteress Male 13-17
    14 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 6:26 pm
    It WENT through, 2 years ago. Although it is constantly being refined and adjusted, you`ve been filtered by the govt all that time. The fact that you didn`t even know you were being filtered means they`re doing it right, IMHO.

    Then why were they talking about passing one last year? And what sites are actually filtered cause ive never seen a page saying that the page is banned.

  57. Profile photo of jgl2832
    jgl2832 Male 18-29
    3 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 6:29 pm
    http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/...
  58. Profile photo of ezili
    ezili Female 18-29
    36 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 6:40 pm
    i agree with Lionhart - this artical is a load of [email protected] - i`ve never heard of small boobs being banned
    but we are going through some political turmoil that could drastically change our sensorship - in a few years we may end up like china (thanks to 1 dick in parliament and a bunch of do-gooder bludgers)
    http://stephen-conroy.com
    this will not stop childpornography (which is illegal and already blacklisted) but rather anything that anyone objects to (i.e. blog discussing euthanasia) it will also filter images based on how much skin-tone a computer thinks it has as well as a host of other ridiculous things.
    Please support us in getting this one chucked out of parliament altogether
    ps - you can already get a free filter to install locally if you don`t want your kids to see this kind of stuff
  59. Profile photo of Lejjena
    Lejjena Male 18-29
    68 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 6:43 pm
    T*ts or GTFO
  60. Profile photo of dragonshadoz
    dragonshadoz Female 18-29
    4031 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 7:28 pm
    Down with censorship!
    My girlfriend has non-big boobs. I guess that makes me a paedophile. :-|
  61. Profile photo of han5nah
    han5nah Female 13-17
    735 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 8:12 pm
    so i, a skinny 15 year old, would be allowed in porn because i have 36D size boobs? --and thats not pedophilia?

    haaa.

  62. Profile photo of raggz2009
    raggz2009 Female 18-29
    63 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 8:37 pm
    Australia makes me so sad.

    Good thing there`s New Zealand to balance things out!

  63. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8306 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 8:49 pm
    > Matteress
    > why were they talking about passing one last year?

    Because even though the Act hasn`t been passed yet, it obviously needs to be put in place, trialled and tweaked or else it would be 5 years after the Act before anything happened. The filtering has been operating "in testing" for just over two years already.

  64. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8306 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 8:49 pm
    > Matteress
    > what sites are actually filtered cause ive never seen a page saying that the page is banned.

    Which was my whole point. Unless the Nutcase Conspiracy World Government Giant Computer Under Parliament House Running the World movement is right for once, and the government DO actually start blacklisting any site they like, then the average person will NEVER see a blacklist ban page because you have to be one sick puppy to even be trying to access the stuff they`re blocking. And I`m not talking normal Rule 34 here, I`m talking extremely sick twisted crap. We can do without it, go back to your brown paper mailbox deliveries whoever wants that stuff.

  65. Profile photo of SuperSmash
    SuperSmash Male 18-29
    3758 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 9:38 pm
    That`s ridiculous.

    I never realized Australia was a communist country.

  66. Profile photo of BenTheBug
    BenTheBug Male 18-29
    1195 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 9:55 pm
    And the navy pays for breast implants... http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/09/...
  67. Profile photo of zipil
    zipil Male 13-17
    9 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 10:14 pm
    AHAHAHAHA that never happened the internet stuff is true but there is no ban on "small breasts" you guys crack me up
  68. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15841 posts
    January 31, 2010 at 11:14 pm
    Next thing they`ll be banning guys with little weenies. Oh, wait, I think the pr0n industry already did that.

    Oh, well, can I get a refund of my membership dues for the Australian chapter of the IBTC?

  69. Profile photo of Lionhart2
    Lionhart2 Male 40-49
    8306 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 12:16 am
    > OldOllie
    > Next thing they`ll be banning guys with little weenies

    Well there goes 90% of the IAB community, straight out the door.

  70. Profile photo of number696969
    number696969 Male 30-39
    258 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 12:39 am
    @SuperSmash
    A true communist country would be striving for a society without class or division, so boobs of any size, shape or colour would be happily welcomed into the collective.
    Does the US still ban women`s nipples on `normal` TV channels?
  71. Profile photo of JimmytheMed
    JimmytheMed Male 18-29
    46 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 12:44 am
    While I doubt this article is true, Australian censorship is ridiculous. But what can you expect from a country as drated up as Australia.
  72. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 1:11 am
    AHAHAHAHA that never happened the internet stuff is true but there is no ban on "small breasts" you guys crack me up

    I suggest you check out the censorship rating guidelines for Australia and, more importantly, how they are being implemented.

    I`ll summarise, but I`m not asking you to take my word for it.

    Sexual material that the censorship board claim they think might be pretending to depict someone who might be under 18 is banned in Australia (and many other places). Note that the age of the people involved is irrelevant - material in which everyone is over 25 can be classed as child porn in Australia (and elsewhere).

    Some people with enough power have decided that any image of any woman with small breasts might be pretending to depict someone who might be under 18.

    So there is at least some substance in the story. Australia is run by mad censors at the moment, so it`s both plausible and supported by evidence.

  73. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 1:28 am
    then the average person will NEVER see a blacklist ban page because you have to be one sick puppy to even be trying to access the stuff they`re blocking.

    That might be true if they were completely honest, the system was perfect and no-one was at all concerned about it.

    Since none of those things are true, your conclusion is wrong.

    The most important aspect of this sort of censorship is pre-emptive censorship due to deliberately vague definitions and the degree of harm involved.

    Say, for example, you were a pornographer. You`d have a website, of course. You carefully check the age of every one of your performers and you make the usual porn - bad acting, inane plots and ludicrous dialogue. You`re making a pile of money from it.

    So why risk selling in Australia, where you cannot know what porn is illegal until after you`ve already been labelled a child pornographer and general scumbag, thus ruining you and maybe jailing you?

  74. Profile photo of Vindictive
    Vindictive Female 18-29
    1077 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 5:13 am
    "Next thing they`ll be banning guys with little weenies

    Well there goes 90% of the IAB community, straight out the door. "


    ...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. free internet for you.

  75. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 7:32 am
    NOOOOO!!! boobies are like snowflakes all are different and beautiful weather itty bitty or large.
  76. Profile photo of GlooStikk
    GlooStikk Male 18-29
    1297 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 8:46 am
    that is f*cked.

    NET NEUTRALITY FOR ALL!!!
    oh and free the small boobies too... damn

  77. Profile photo of moefreak
    moefreak Female 18-29
    1963 posts
    February 1, 2010 at 8:48 am
    What???

    This is officially going on my list of "reasons to never go to australia" right after "thousands of creatures that can kill me". I refuse to go to a country where I can`t enjoy some porn with small breasted ladies in it.

    Kidding, but only just.

  78. Profile photo of StudentOfMan
    StudentOfMan Male 40-49
    346 posts
    February 2, 2010 at 8:28 pm
    This article is BS. If the Aussie government has supposedly already banned sites containing material that is "18+", then it already bans pornography. So the assertion that it is further banning small breasted porn is asinine. If it is rue, then the Aussies need to take back their government; except for the small boobie thing, yeah nobody likes small boobies.
  79. Profile photo of Irontop33
    Irontop33 Male 18-29
    89 posts
    February 3, 2010 at 12:40 am
    who cares? the whole country will one day be eaten by an uprising of poisonous crocodiles and giant lizards
  80. Profile photo of seanmoo2
    seanmoo2 Male 18-29
    29 posts
    February 6, 2010 at 3:01 am
    if i raise my eyebrow anymore it`s going to fly away

Leave a Reply