The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 62    Average: 3.9/5]
66 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 40971
Rating: 3.9
Category: Science
Date: 12/12/09 10:00 AM

66 Responses to What Doesn`t Disney Not Get About Science? [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18942 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:09 am
    Link: What Doesn`t Disney Not Get About Science? - Ultra Violet Ray protected? Really Disney?
  2. Profile photo of lukas1051
    lukas1051 Male 18-29
    3426 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:16 am
    This isn`t even debateable, it`s just a blatant lie. Who approved this to go on shelves?
  3. Profile photo of ToughCookie
    ToughCookie Female 18-29
    59 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:20 am
    what a lovely tan this will leave on your eyeballs
  4. Profile photo of ryan99
    ryan99 Male 13-17
    2345 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:21 am
    Look like Kanye, AND protect your eyes! Yeah!
  5. Profile photo of SuperSmash
    SuperSmash Male 18-29
    3758 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:24 am
    Maybe since they`re Kanye glasses they mean that they provide 100% protection for the Unusually Vain.
  6. Profile photo of Matwix_2004
    Matwix_2004 Male 18-29
    2551 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:27 am
    Either that or Disney is producing products that are a lot more advanced than others on the market.

    Way to go Disney!

  7. Profile photo of WorldOfJames
    WorldOfJames Male 18-29
    978 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:27 am
    god i hate those glasses. damn you kanye for making them popular
  8. Profile photo of Isseepy
    Isseepy Female 18-29
    160 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:27 am
    Wow... really?
  9. Profile photo of hypergames
    hypergames Male 13-17
    47 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:28 am
    LOL disney doesnt sell kanye glasses. silly billy charlie!
  10. Profile photo of shinsvaka
    shinsvaka Male 18-29
    308 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:30 am
    huh, that makes absolutely no sense at all.
    *facepalm*
  11. Profile photo of StarCallista
    StarCallista Female 18-29
    256 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:32 am
    Double negative. Standards are slipping, my dears.

    ... Shutter Shades look ridiculous anyway.

  12. Profile photo of RearEchelon
    RearEchelon Male 18-29
    139 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:48 am
    Maybe they`re saying the cheap plastic is 100% protected from yellowing and cracking from UV exposure by the kitschy purple paint.
  13. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7475 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:54 am
    i think the only thing these would protect from would be an eye gouge
  14. Profile photo of panth753
    panth753 Female 18-29
    9258 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:00 am
    I hate those glasses.
  15. Profile photo of Adie22
    Adie22 Female 18-29
    182 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:17 am
    Perhaps the Hannah Montana Generation will buy it
  16. Profile photo of Pyroxysm
    Pyroxysm Female 13-17
    2 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:31 am
    Ahh, I`m not the only one to notice this! I go to Disney World all the time, and every time I see those glasses I make fun of the label...
    Someone should sue for that. I think that would be funny... o_O
  17. Profile photo of Trizz
    Trizz Male 18-29
    1383 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:34 am
    I spose it block 100% of the light that hits the purple bits???
  18. Profile photo of RVIsh
    RVIsh Male 18-29
    251 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:38 am
    @Adie22

    Perhaps? Aww, your optimism makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

  19. Profile photo of CoffeeDiiva
    CoffeeDiiva Female 40-49
    1604 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:48 am
    someone should sue? I hope are joking because there is enough sue happy idiots in this country as it is.

    Maybe they meant the label was 100% UV protection hahaha.

  20. Profile photo of buttersisluv
    buttersisluv Female 18-29
    362 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:02 pm
    Anyone who would wear those is stupid enough to believe that.
  21. Profile photo of CitrusCider
    CitrusCider Female 13-17
    372 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:14 pm
    Are you kidding me??
  22. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:16 pm
    Wow false marketing!
  23. Profile photo of Pyroxysm
    Pyroxysm Female 13-17
    2 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:19 pm
    @Coffee, yes, I am joking, but looking at it as Disney`s loss would be better than seeing it as some random guy`s gain... though they wouldn`t care... lol
  24. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:26 pm
    LIIIIEEEES. That`s like at MOST 40% UV protection.
  25. Profile photo of Zerocyde
    Zerocyde Male 18-29
    3256 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:27 pm
    @buttersisluv

    Correct.

  26. Profile photo of Arbniter20
    Arbniter20 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:07 pm
    lol. my friend has some of these. in fact she`s wearing them in her FB pic
  27. Profile photo of tyrannus
    tyrannus Male 18-29
    201 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:10 pm
    New! Invisible lenses! Get yours today.
  28. Profile photo of sandtalker
    sandtalker Male 30-39
    49 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:10 pm
    Well, it DOES protect 100% of 40% of the eyes...
  29. Profile photo of v_ataraxic
    v_ataraxic Female 18-29
    208 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:39 pm
    Disney can NOT come up with anything on their own. Every single one of those `classics` is a rip off.
  30. Profile photo of fatex52986
    fatex52986 Male 18-29
    1129 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:41 pm
    lol Opie... haha
  31. Profile photo of -NeonCarrot-
    -NeonCarrot- Male 13-17
    1496 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:45 pm
    40% of the time, it works every time.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLq2-uZd5...
  32. Profile photo of KLouD
    KLouD Male 30-39
    254 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 3:01 pm
    I don`t get why this is so hard to understand. The purple color on the glasses dissipates the uv rays thus protecting your eyes. lrn2science
  33. Profile photo of Cailin
    Cailin Female 18-29
    97 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:14 pm
    "What Doesn`t Disney Not Get About Science?"

    Grammar fail.

  34. Profile photo of gatorade777
    gatorade777 Male 18-29
    1194 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:21 pm
    I have lost all respect for this site for the title. Remove the suffix from the word "Doesn`t" immediately.
  35. Profile photo of gatorade777
    gatorade777 Male 18-29
    1194 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:22 pm
    because of the title*
  36. Profile photo of gatorade777
    gatorade777 Male 18-29
    1194 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:28 pm
    It may be a pun since they are violet colored. If not a pun that is what they`ll use in court.
  37. Profile photo of ParasyT
    ParasyT Male 13-17
    533 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 5:01 pm
    "What doesn`t Disney not get about science?"

    What don`t you get about grammar?

  38. Profile photo of kevinmiller1
    kevinmiller1 Male 18-29
    106 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 5:19 pm
    Doesn`t not comma comma not not drr drrrr drrrrr not english doesn`t learns and stuff.
  39. Profile photo of Gn0m3
    Gn0m3 Male 18-29
    421 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 5:33 pm
    lol wut kevin??
  40. Profile photo of Skreshavik
    Skreshavik Female 18-29
    1284 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 6:24 pm
    Lol, no offense, but those shades look so dorky, and I know nothing about culture >.>

    Uh...? Kevin. I`m to assume you mean the description? Convert this:
    "What Doesn`t Disney Not Get About Science? . Ultra Violet Ray protected? Really Disney?"
    To this:
    ""What Doesn`t Disney Understand About Science ? Ultra-Violet Protected? Really, Disney?"

  41. Profile photo of Jasonbobdude
    Jasonbobdude Male 18-29
    1598 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 6:28 pm
    The sad thing is that anyone who wears these kind of sunglasses would actually believe that.
  42. Profile photo of Cajun247
    Cajun247 Male 18-29
    10742 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 7:08 pm
    Even more reasons why I don`t like Disney.
  43. Profile photo of GuardinGnome
    GuardinGnome Male 18-29
    2893 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 7:14 pm
    Those shades are so F**king stupid.
  44. Profile photo of BunnyNaku
    BunnyNaku Female 18-29
    5224 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 7:17 pm
    im surprised hannah montana isnt on that tag
  45. Profile photo of luvsushi
    luvsushi Female 18-29
    169 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:19 pm
    *snicker*
  46. Profile photo of xxPinkxx
    xxPinkxx Female 18-29
    3829 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:20 pm
    lol bunnienaku. i agree.
  47. Profile photo of strangergoat
    strangergoat Female 18-29
    588 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 12:17 am
    Double negative in the title? Confusing.
  48. Profile photo of xLelouch
    xLelouch Male 18-29
    6 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 2:51 am
    @strangergoat ahhhahahaha i noticed that too lulz
  49. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 3:41 am
    LIIIIEEEES. That`s like at MOST 40% UV protection.
    I dunno opie, it looks like half the lens bit is covered by the alternating pattern. 50% UV protection maybe?

    And the self-appointed grammar Nazis in this thread are wrong.
    What doesn`t Disney not get about science?

    Double negative, so the real question is:
    What does Disney get about science?

    Answer: Nothing.

    No grammar problem there.

  50. Profile photo of IRockYeah
    IRockYeah Male 40-49
    2619 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 8:04 am
    I cant for the life of me figure out who would wear those type of shades after they were made more famous by the master douchebag Kanye "imma let you finish" West
  51. Profile photo of skite111
    skite111 Male 30-39
    99 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 8:57 am
    What DOES Disney not get about science?
  52. Profile photo of CHICOMIMI
    CHICOMIMI Female 18-29
    854 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 10:09 am
    Now I know where all the wannabe rappers get their sades...
  53. Profile photo of Freyr108
    Freyr108 Male 18-29
    203 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 10:18 am
    maybe that does refer to protection for the eyes, maybe it has a special coating, protecting the pastic from uv rays XD
  54. Profile photo of Antonin
    Antonin Male 18-29
    72 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 10:18 am
    I asked them about it, they said that it was magic... ooooooh.
  55. Profile photo of SoapeyLOV
    SoapeyLOV Female 13-17
    91 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 1:30 pm
    FAIL
  56. Profile photo of Aretsuku-kun
    Aretsuku-kun Male 13-17
    309 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 8:21 pm
    Disney has the greatest sunglasses of all time!
  57. Profile photo of OmgZelda
    OmgZelda Female 18-29
    1593 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 11:56 pm
    LOL
  58. Profile photo of Nurcowski
    Nurcowski Male 18-29
    264 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 12:22 am
    what they meant to say was: shields some UV rays 100% of the time
  59. Profile photo of idiotfilter
    idiotfilter Male 18-29
    3916 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 3:06 pm
    broken...
  60. Profile photo of Fimbulvetr
    Fimbulvetr Male 13-17
    12 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 7:22 pm
    I`ve seen teens my age actually wear these.
    they look so retarted in them, it`s almost amazing.
  61. Profile photo of lukeforv123
    lukeforv123 Male 18-29
    1058 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 8:43 pm
    That is soooooooo funny, I can`t stop laughing. not
  62. Profile photo of adaedwar
    adaedwar Male 18-29
    192 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 11:46 pm
    Well it shields 100% UV that hits the product... Mine don`t block what doesn`t hit the actual glass. Stupid mistake but if they had good lawyers (which they do) then it`s airtight against anyone who challenges it.
  63. Profile photo of k10josumm
    k10josumm Male 18-29
    432 posts
    December 15, 2009 at 11:59 am
    there`s no such thing as false advertisement anymore folks. laws too fu*ked up.
  64. Profile photo of theforrest
    theforrest Male 18-29
    118 posts
    December 17, 2009 at 4:12 pm
    @Fimbulvetr: almost as "retarded" as you are for misspelling your insult.
  65. Profile photo of marcos_g45
    marcos_g45 Male 13-17
    46 posts
    December 20, 2009 at 2:02 pm
    touche @theforrest lol
  66. Profile photo of cacacaca500
    cacacaca500 Male 13-17
    93 posts
    December 21, 2009 at 3:44 pm
    haha, they`ll say anything to sell, and people have probably bought those sunglassess! LMAO

Leave a Reply