The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 36    Average: 3.1/5]
76 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 27760
Rating: 3.1
Category: Science
Date: 12/12/09 08:00 AM

76 Responses to Creationist/Intelligent Design Bingo Card [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of almightybob1
    almightybob1 Male 18-29
    4290 posts
    December 5, 2009 at 4:33 am
    Link: Creationist/Intelligent Design Bingo Card - For the next I-A-B evolution debate. Bonus point: use one of these arguments in the comments below!
  2. Profile photo of KX250F
    KX250F Male 13-17
    264 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 8:52 am
    The Joker made me laugh :D
  3. Profile photo of npdarren
    npdarren Male 18-29
    602 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 8:57 am
    Well, I suppose I can address two of the points: That Darwinism is responsible for Hitler and that there is no evidence for evolution.

    Social Darwinism, some will argue, is what Hitler used as reason for developing his "supreme Aryan race". However, Darwinism is more about a social version of "survival of the fittest". While Hitler may have believed his race was the "fittest" for domination, many of his views stemmed from a distorted religious view. This also led to things like the Holocaust which was definitely not the result of Social Darwinism.

    Also, many scientists have proven evolution on microbial levels. With small organisms, it is not difficult to show evolution in action. Thus I wouldn`t qualify the argument that there is no evidence for evolution.

  4. Profile photo of a1butcher
    a1butcher Male 40-49
    4809 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:08 am
    How the hell is that suppose to be a BINGO card?
    Oh I see, it says "bingo" on it.
    I think someone is just trolling for another debate which are always amusing but never get anywhere.
  5. Profile photo of Spirithound
    Spirithound Male 18-29
    814 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:08 am
    Rule 34 is just a theory.
  6. Profile photo of shunpo_31
    shunpo_31 Male 18-29
    1381 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:12 am
    I don`t understand. None of these are arguments used by ID scientists.

    These are, of course, things uneducated children would use in the instance of coming up against an educated atheist.

    I am an ID guy, and I apologize for all the idiots out there with my viewpoint. I see them as just as ignorant as all of you do. :-)

  7. Profile photo of BlankTom
    BlankTom Male 30-39
    1674 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:15 am
    I don`t get how to play. Do you have to match columns and topic or just topic. And also, won`t everyone win at the same time if there`s only one card?
  8. Profile photo of keith2
    keith2 Male 30-39
    2589 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:16 am
    Teach the controversy/let the children decide... hmm.. it will just end up like it is today, some of the children will have a thirst for knowledge and will learn science, critical thinking, and have a sense of rationality, -or- they`ll say to hell with all that and blindly follow the easiest explanation for everything. god did it god did it and god did it. with a lil help from superjesus.
  9. Profile photo of lukas1051
    lukas1051 Male 18-29
    3426 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:20 am
    Intelligent design is BS. Take humans for example, why would God give us an appendix if the only purpose it serves is to occasionally go wrong and kill us?
  10. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:22 am
    In before the deba-

    Aww dammit...

  11. Profile photo of Zerocyde
    Zerocyde Male 18-29
    3256 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:33 am
    I`m on the science team of the debate, but I don`t get why god and the big bang have to be either one or the other, ya know?

    The big bang theory has NOTHING TO DO with the creation of the universe. The big bang theory is about what happened AFTER the universe started.

  12. Profile photo of Zerocyde
    Zerocyde Male 18-29
    3256 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:34 am
    Ohh, and I LOVE the "just a theory" bullpoo.

    Just a theory? Really? NO poo!! They say that as if there is something higher than theory in science, lol.

  13. Profile photo of BrimstoneOne
    BrimstoneOne Male 30-39
    2229 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:41 am
    Anyone the quote Darwin as saying "survival of the fittest", is misquoting.

    `It is not the the strongest of the species that survives, but the one most adaptive to change.`
    Charles Darwin

  14. Profile photo of lukas1051
    lukas1051 Male 18-29
    3426 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:42 am
    The only reason things are considered theories is because religion thinks otherwise. Science has solid evidence, it`s science, truth. There is as much evidence for evolution as there is for gravity, the only difference? No-one ever questions gravity.
  15. Profile photo of BrimstoneOne
    BrimstoneOne Male 30-39
    2229 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:42 am
    if one quotes poo, do it right or don`t do it at all
  16. Profile photo of jtrebowski
    jtrebowski Male 40-49
    3359 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:45 am
    "Teach the controversy/let the children decide"....Sure...teach evolution in schools, creationism in church. Why is that so hard?
  17. Profile photo of catbarf
    catbarf Male 18-29
    1455 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:05 am
    "The only reason things are considered theories is because religion thinks otherwise. "

    Er, no, they are considered theories because science never claims to have all the answers. The only facts that exist in science are direct observations- an explanation of observations, such as gravity or evolution, can never progress beyond a theory.

    It`s a definitions thing and a wonderful acid test to see how dumb a debate opponent is.

  18. Profile photo of DeutschDude9
    DeutschDude9 Male 18-29
    473 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:09 am
    BrimstoneOne:
    "Anyone the quote Darwin as saying "survival of the fittest", is misquoting.

    `It is not the the strongest of the species that survives, but the one most adaptive to change.`
    Charles Darwin"

    I`m sorry but you are misquoting and misinterpreting what the word fit means. Fitness is not a measuremnt of strength, speed or any atheletic ability. Fitness in evolutionary sense is the ability to produce viable offspring. So the phrase "survival of the fittest" means the organism that is well adapted to produce more viable offspring will continue longer than less fit organisms. You were close, but your definition of fitness is wrong.

  19. Profile photo of yayforme
    yayforme Male 18-29
    156 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:11 am
    "The only facts that exist in science are direct observations"

    Such as which ones? "The sky is blue?" Jeez.

  20. Profile photo of SonofSwink
    SonofSwink Male 18-29
    3 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:18 am
    "Teach the controversy/let the children decide"....Sure...teach evolution in schools, creationism in church. Why is that so hard?"
    because not all children go to church
  21. Profile photo of Gexxo
    Gexxo Male 18-29
    673 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:38 am
    I`ll take "Darwanism responsible for the Holocaust" for 200, alex.
  22. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 10:43 am
    What`s interesting to me is that the people who cry out that evolution is a lie are more often than not the same people who cry that global warming is a lie. Forgive me for equating their scientific ignorance of the former with their scientific ignorance of the latter.

    They`re also usually the same people who oppose gay marriage, think Obama is the antichrist, and oppose socialised heath care. But that`s another story.

  23. Profile photo of L_Peter
    L_Peter Male 13-17
    78 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:00 am
    Wow davymid, you literally just described my physics teacher exactly. He spends the first half hour talking about one of those things, and the next teaching haha
  24. Profile photo of CheeseMan1
    CheeseMan1 Male 18-29
    1408 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:19 am
    I think several of those squares could fit under the bottom right one.
  25. Profile photo of Nidonemo
    Nidonemo Male 18-29
    9308 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:28 am
    Davymid: But didn`t we all just learn that Global warming WAS a lie? The leaked emails recently? We`ve been going through a global cooling instead. (Yes, I`m serious.) Then there was that woman who was all up in arms about the hackers not being the center of attention? It was like someone wanting to punish a peeping tom for discovering a meth lab?
  26. Profile photo of slayer50515
    slayer50515 Male 18-29
    988 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:34 am
    "No morality without God"
    See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rbCVcRpn...
    Can you think of anything immoral an Atheist would do because he does not believe in god? (No.) How about a Theist? (Definitely; Suicide bombing, crusades, holy wars, etc.)
  27. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:54 am
    "Davymid: But didn`t we all just learn that Global warming WAS a lie? The leaked emails recently?"

    Nope. The leaked emails (or rather, 15 selected sentences from 5 emails between 3 climatologists over a period of 10 years) are innocuous at best if you read them, and best I can tell taken completely out of context to stir up a sh*t-storm. Hardly an overturn of our entire understanding of decades of climate science among the global scientific community. Wikipedia has a decent, impartial article on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climategate#E-mails

  28. Profile photo of addler
    addler Male 13-17
    777 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:57 am
    "What`s interesting to me is that the people who cry out that evolution is a lie are more often than not the same people who cry that global warming is a lie"

    of course then there are the people who accept global warming as 100 percent truth... who also accepted global cooling as a problem in the 1970s...

    so your logic is kind of flawed here "they are wrong because global warming is right, and they don`t beleive in global warming" because your basis of the truth isnt exactly, well truthful.

  29. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7378 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:57 am
    Indeed davymid they are also the same people who think the Iraq war was just, Obama is not American and George Bush was a good president.
  30. Profile photo of Skreshavik
    Skreshavik Female 18-29
    1284 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:06 pm
    This board makes me smile.

    @slayer.

    God is a faith, not a religion. Just you, Jesus as the median, and God.
    Not you, the pedo priest, Mr. T, the TV, the pronz last night, white Jesus, and then God.

  31. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 12:21 pm
    Hmmm.....
  32. Profile photo of yayforme
    yayforme Male 18-29
    156 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:18 pm
    @Skreshavik. Faith, I mean, "Faith", with capital letters, is a religious thing... I think you meant that one can connect with God through oneself, without medians.... then why the "with Jesus as median" thing?? Equating Jesus with God is a 100% religion thing.
  33. Profile photo of v_ataraxic
    v_ataraxic Female 18-29
    208 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    I say: TEACH THE CONTROVERSY; LET THE CHILDREN DECIDE.
  34. Profile photo of v_ataraxic
    v_ataraxic Female 18-29
    208 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:56 pm
    "Religion without science is ignorant, science without religion is lame" Einstein. Why can`t both be incorporated into each other?
  35. Profile photo of ElSombrero
    ElSombrero Male 13-17
    716 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 1:56 pm
    I hate the person that made this. `

    They`re only driving the freaking annoying argument further then it needs to.

    Half the commenters on this are proof.

  36. Profile photo of gammapane
    gammapane Male 18-29
    170 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 2:32 pm
    ok now i feel really stupid yet satisfied
  37. Profile photo of lemmingboy15
    lemmingboy15 Male 18-29
    635 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 3:45 pm
    lol going off all of the posts on this site that bash christians/creationists, it`s very obvious where I-A-B stands. :P
  38. Profile photo of KoalaMeatPie
    KoalaMeatPie Male 18-29
    2578 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 3:58 pm
    And people wonder why I debate.
  39. Profile photo of Raberboom
    Raberboom Male 18-29
    833 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:28 pm
    "A man`s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."

    Einstein

  40. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:30 pm
    Why can`t both be incorporated into each other?

    Because they`re completely different things.

    I`s like combining an apple and an aeroplane - sure, you can place the apple on the plane or crush it and smear it over the plane, but that isn`t incorporating them into each other.

  41. Profile photo of Raberboom
    Raberboom Male 18-29
    833 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:33 pm
    "it may be that today gold has become the exclusive ruler of life, but the time will come when man will again bow down before a higher god."

    Hitler

  42. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:36 pm
    because not all children go to church

    So why should they be taught the creation stories of the religion those churches are part of?

    Schools are for education, not religion. Religious creation stories might fit in a course *about* religion, but that shouldn`t ignore all the other religious creation stories (and there are hundreds).

  43. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:41 pm
    It`s a definitions thing and a wonderful acid test to see how dumb a debate opponent is.

    Not necessariy dumb. Maybe ignorant. Maybe a person who realises that they have no argument and therefore must resort to lying about the opposing argument.

    Whatever the reason, anyone who uses any form of "only a theory" argument proves that they have no credibility. Unfortunately, many people are ignorant enough to fall for it.

  44. Profile photo of premierwondr
    premierwondr Male 18-29
    975 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 4:44 pm
    angillion what if science is god?
  45. Profile photo of Armydillo
    Armydillo Male 13-17
    138 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 5:32 pm
    I am a Christian who believes in evolution.
    It is never made clear that days in the Bible are the days of now.
    The six days in which the Earth and Heavens were created could be any amount of time.
    So stop the arguing, stop the flame wars, stop the "YOU`RE FORCING YOUR BELIEFS ON ME" on BOTH sides, and seriously you guys:

    FACEPALM!!!

  46. Profile photo of Skreshavik
    Skreshavik Female 18-29
    1284 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 6:26 pm
    @yayforme
    Religion is man`s way to get into heaven
    Faith is God`s way =p

    @ElSombrero
    Yea, these things are ridiculous, and people walk the brink of retarded. But damn, is it fun to fuel people and their righteous indignation to protect an opinion which will fizzle in a day or two.

  47. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 6:35 pm
    lol going off all of the posts on this site that bash christians/creationists, it`s very obvious where I-A-B stands. :P

    To be fair, the 12 or so people who run I-A-B day to day (fancylad and us mods) are a pretty balanced bunch when it comes to these things.

  48. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 6:35 pm
    For example: Most of us are neutral, or don`t have outspoken views one way or the other. Me, almightybob and maddog are outspoken liberal atheists/agnostics who are proponents of evolution, and mainstream science in general. Sixclaws, Primetimekin and Lionhart2 are devout christians. In particular, Prime is a staunch republican who does not support gay marriage, has serious doubts about evolution, and thinks global warming is a lie made up by liberals. Lionhart goes one further - he`s literally a young-earth (Christian) creationist who denies the geological age of the earth and thinks geochronology is a false science.

    We take some pride in being a fair and representative cross-section of the I-A-B community, which is why we`ve been individually selected as mods/admins. I for one think it`s very fair.

  49. Profile photo of Chrisdude92
    Chrisdude92 Male 18-29
    159 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 6:49 pm
    Thank you Armydillo.
  50. Profile photo of BunnyNaku
    BunnyNaku Female 18-29
    5224 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 7:21 pm
    100pt for @armydillo
  51. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 7:22 pm
    2, 4, 6, 7, 9-12, 14, 15 are mostly reasonable, and/or necessary statements. Some are usually only said in response to common bad arguments.

    Some are only offensive if you object to the theistic viewpoint from the get go and/or do not understand the wording.

    (Lets take #7, Faith != Blind faith for example, theists usually talk about Faith in a sense that is comparable with an inductive leap between evidence and conclusion. This usually causes much anger amongst their opponents who will start screaming about how they don`t have FAITH, they have FACTS, ignoring the inductive nature of science in general. One of the best demonstrations of which is evolution.)

    18 is not an argument I`ve ever heard, though I have heard "DNA is a code", which it is, so what`s the problem? The problem is you don`t like the follow up that "this suggests a creator", but you`re bashing the wrong argument here.

  52. Profile photo of SuperSmash
    SuperSmash Male 18-29
    3758 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 7:30 pm
    I think it`s amazing that we develop from a microscopic little sperm, but can`t relate to the complexities of the universe.
  53. Profile photo of ImTakingOver
    ImTakingOver Male 18-29
    388 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 8:02 pm
    Baalthazaq, congrats on your bingo. 2 is pointless because even once a theory is fact it can still be called a theory, because it is one, and evolution is proven. 4 is mere idiocy, how could you call it reasonable? 6, if i am correct in concluding that it refers to the whole "watch must have a watchmaker" argument, it is a bad analogy and makes enormous faulty assumption about life and is quite unreasonable. 7.... I shouldn`t even have to say anything about that one haha. 9; Just because the universe supports life on the one planet we know it does, that does not mean that it is fine-tuned, another jump to conclusions. 10, I won`t comment on, I`m not a paleontologist. 11, religious indoctrination is a form of child abuse. 12, quote-mining is not reasonable. 14, macro and micro-evolution are the same thing. 15, only mutations are `random`, evolution itself is not.
  54. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 8:35 pm
    Baal, reasonable statements? I thought you were smarter than this.
  55. Profile photo of LadyIsis
    LadyIsis Female 18-29
    403 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 8:55 pm
    here`s an idea, why don`t we let everyone believe what they want
    and if someone doesn`t agree with you, get over it and go on with your life
  56. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 9:04 pm
    here`s an idea, why don`t we let everyone believe what they want... and if someone doesn`t agree with you, get over it and go on with your life

    I`m down with that. However, when it encroaches on the school science class, that`s when I`m going to have some serious beef.

  57. Profile photo of ohthedrama
    ohthedrama Male 30-39
    162 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:34 pm
    I don`t care if a person has an opinion about something but when they pass arguments that are wrong like in the idea that the Earth is only 6000 years old I have an issue with that. It`s wrong. It`s not an opinion anymore.
  58. Profile photo of ohthedrama
    ohthedrama Male 30-39
    162 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:37 pm
    "Religion without science is ignorant, science without religion is lame" Einstein. Why can`t both be incorporated into each other?"

    The Catholic Church FIRMLY believes in this that science and faith MUST co-exist as both are a product of God`s will. Faith cannot conflict with reason and vice versa. Granted one does have to make a leap of faith with certain dogma`s of the Catholic Faith, in the end, Faith and Reason still must co-exist.

  59. Profile photo of yayforme
    yayforme Male 18-29
    156 posts
    December 12, 2009 at 11:44 pm
    "I say: TEACH THE CONTROVERSY; LET THE CHILDREN DECIDE."

    Why? Children are too young to know why they choose to believe in anything.

    "Why can`t both be incorporated into each other?"

    I think they can. But people are just too intolerant, and major religions are flawed.

    "here`s an idea, why don`t we let everyone believe what they want and if someone doesn`t agree with you, get over it and go on with your life"

    Mmm, after some thought, I say the future of humankind depends on everyone`s beliefs. So, it`s not that trivial.

  60. Profile photo of itsallfake
    itsallfake Male 30-39
    474 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 12:36 am
    Regarding the "just a theory" part. Above a theory is a law. Scientific laws are unbreakable. Thermal Dynamics is a good example. The reason evolution is still in the theory stage and not in the law stage is because evidence for the evolution of ALL species has not been unearthed yet. There are just too many species, too many ancenstors to document or catalog in order to say that evolution is LAW. Because there are gaps, the scientific community will not allow evolution to become law. On the flipside, according to christians the bible is the word of god and therefore is LAW. But, as we all know, the LAW of god is not to lie, but humans are capable of lies from the time they are able to speak. Going by the scientific standards, since humans are capable of breaking every LAW that god supposedly made, then by pure difinition, the word of God is "Just a theory"
  61. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 2:26 am
    angillion what if science is god?

    Huh?

    Science is a method, a way of doing things. It is not a person. Two fundamentally different things can`t be each other. You may as well ask "What if democracy is a fish?"

  62. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 2:41 am
    It is never made clear that days in the Bible are the days of now.

    I think it`s worth pointing out that the relevant word is not `day`. It`s `yom` (transliterated Hebrew). If the precise meaning of a word is important, it`s necessary to look at the original and not a translation, and also to look at the original cultural context.

    I agree with your point, though. As far as I can tell from reading and discussing it with people who understand Hebrew, `yom` doesn`t have a single fixed meaning as a specific length of time and, as far as we can tell, didn`t have ~2500 years ago when the story was written. Which makes `day` and excellent translation in this case.

    Even if a Christian ignores thought and just parrots their book, it`s still the same. There are several places in which a word translated (from Hebrew or Greek) as `day` is explicitly *not* 12 or 24 hours.

  63. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 2:54 am
    I think it`s amazing that we develop from a microscopic little sperm

    That`s quite a few centuries behind current understanding. It`s now generally considered proven that we develop from a combination of an egg and a sperm.

    Genetics is awesome. A fantastically complex system using only 2 pairs of bases. A system which is species-transparent across all life on Earth. A cell from any Terran life form can process any DNA from any Terran life form. Right now, there are monkeys walking around with jellyfish DNA *that their bodies use*.

  64. Profile photo of clam85
    clam85 Male 13-17
    53 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 2:57 am
    "Science is a method, a way of doing things. It is not a person. Two fundamentally different things can`t be each other. You may as well ask "What if democracy is a fish?"

    What if it really is???

  65. Profile photo of Angilion
    Angilion Male 40-49
    12387 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 3:08 am
    Nice argument, itsallfake, but it`s wrong. In science, a law is not a proven theory. They`re two different things.

    A scientific law is a simple statement concerning what will happen under specific circumstances. It offers no explanation and is very narrowly defined (usually as a single equation, which might be expressed in language).

    For example: Newton`s second law of motion is F=ma or "when a force acts upon a body, it imparts an acceleration proportional to the force and inversely proportional to the mass of the body and in the direction of the force."

    It offers no explanation regarding why this is so, just a description of it.

    A theory is far wider in scope and explains things. Laws and theories are different things. A theory may contain a number of laws.

    Also: scientific laws can be broken, which is why I chose that example. It`s not wrong, but it doesn`t apply in all circumstances.

  66. Profile photo of DaisyDope
    DaisyDope Female 13-17
    299 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 3:35 am
    DINOSAURS.a christian once told me that dinosaurs didnt exist, they were all hoaxes.
  67. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 5:51 am
    a christian once told me that dinosaurs didnt exist, they were all hoaxes.

    Your christian friend is lying. Dinosaurs definitely did exist. I have proof:

  68. Profile photo of HOBOMOE
    HOBOMOE Male 18-29
    515 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 5:54 am
    i hate religious/creationist peoples
  69. Profile photo of Skott
    Skott Male 18-29
    48 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 7:11 am
    you`re all wrong i created everything out of play-dough and construx
  70. Profile photo of Annie1889
    Annie1889 Female 18-29
    6 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 8:11 am
    DINOSAURS.a christian once told me that dinosaurs didnt exist, they were all hoaxes.

    Have you ever been to the Field Museum in Chicago?

    I highly recommended you go, and take a look at Sue the T-Rex. What do you think she is made out of? Paper mache?

  71. Profile photo of yayforme
    yayforme Male 18-29
    156 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 9:21 am
    @itsallfake.

    *Buzz*!!!!
    But thanks for playing.

  72. Profile photo of Hayllee
    Hayllee Female 13-17
    459 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 9:53 am
    Davymid rules.

    I`m not getting into this, I just had to say that. I may get angry for some reason and come back to fight, but right now I`m having my coffee. :P

  73. Profile photo of phasoo
    phasoo Male 18-29
    285 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 1:23 pm
    I still say that creationists` point of view says what happened and evolutionists` view says how it happened. I don`t see how the two could become spiraled in a conflict.
  74. Profile photo of itsallfake
    itsallfake Male 30-39
    474 posts
    December 13, 2009 at 6:51 pm
    940 characters isn`t enough space to get the point across. Which is this, using the term "just a theory" in no way shape or form conveys the levity that a theory holds. It`s like saying "Oh that, that`s just the largest man made structure in the world" and be sincere and not facetious. So i may be wrong about the whole law bit, but that doesn`t change what im trying to get across.

    Does being wrong about that thing give me less credibility, probably, but the message is still there.

  75. Profile photo of jedimonk
    jedimonk Male 18-29
    188 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 8:23 am
    levity means "lightness of mind; lack of appropriate behavior." I don`t think you meant to use that word...
  76. Profile photo of Handsompod
    Handsompod Male 30-39
    1109 posts
    December 14, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    I think he meant gravity. Or more correctly gravitas.

Leave a Reply