Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
my thoughts exactly, i think they got that part a little wrong lol.
Not really. The planet is already overcrowded as it is."
We should make the death to birth ratio about 1:2 ;P
Despite how much you hate this poster, its still true.
Perfect example: Fruit cake.
Not really. The planet is already overcrowded as it is.
Every minute, 3.42 people die of diarrhea. (In developing countries)
And sonikku, it`s both very real and anthropogenic. Listen to the science, not the poiticians, please.
I just made that up.
Call me in July. It`s too damned cold and dark up there this time of year.
They say "punk" in Europe?
We learn something new every day.
Nah, I just get pissed off by blatant idiocy sometimes... :-<
Did someone say some mean things to you, soniwuwu? :-(
Anyway, more content like this please mods! ;-)
I know, climategate is a bit retarded argument, but i reckon the sort of people who believe in global warming are the sort of people who believe every retarded bullpoo they`re told, so I try the climategate argument and see if that shuts `em up.
of course, it REALLY doesn`t matter whether there`s GW or not; what matters is whether politicians steal gazillions of dollars to "fight" the "global warming", and that won`t happen if people don`t buy their crap. politicians say: "there`s GW and that`s why we have to steal these gazillions of dollars." and we have to say, "no, there isn`t GW, put it back, f*ckers," no matter if there is GW or if there isn`t. because if we admit there is GW, they`ll steal our money.
on the photos: too bad we don`t have a time machine; I`d love to show you how the glacier looked in 1000 AD and then in 1700 AD. and I bet that by 2500 it`s gonna be covered in snow again.
WE DIDN`T START THE FLAME WAR.
erm, no. 2008 was the year the real estate market naturally shrinked after being unnaturally expanded by Greenspan`s extremely cheap credit (and by the mere existence of the monetary policy that DISTURBS the nature of market, for that matter), dragging banking system and the economy down. which, of course, has nothing to do with market failures.
and pls, pretty pls with a little sugar on the top, DON`T TALK ABOUT SH*T YOU DON`T KNOW A F*CK ABOUT, PUNK
"Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine. "
Who cares, lets treat it as FACT.
"Statistics show that 90% of statistics are made up on the spot."Yeah but only 13% of the time
Unfortunately, the AGW supporters will just up the ante, they will say it is getting worse (obviously, with absolutely no evidence). Anyway, I don`t want to start a flame-war here.
All I thought was - "yeah! shoot the Bugatti in the petrol station"
au contraire. the fact that someone gave them money means that they were somehow useful for someone. they produce services that other people reckon useful, and are willing to pay for these services. and that`s what we need, useful people. people that are so useful that we are willing to pay them so much that they can stay alive. i don`t care if someone is disabled, the only thing that matters is how much he can offer to the society. and that is approximately the same that the society is willing to offer him through his employer - i.e. his wage.
HAIL THE INVISIBLE HAND!
please, do tell.
Unnecessary slant ruins the whole thing.
there is no global warming and there will be no floods and droughts, ffs. come on, people, i thought we`re finally over with this after the climategate.
AGREED 100%!This is natural law called "Survival of the Fittest"! We cannot evolve socioeconomically, on a global scale, without following this law!
what needs to happen is that governments stop giving money to people who can`t take care of themselves. unless they stop it, there will be more and more people, and less and less resources for everyone. we need less children to be born, you`re right, but for that, we need less potential parents in the first place. we have to let weak people die no matter how vile that may sound, or we all gonna live in terrible poverty in 50 years!
So your statistic is in the 10% or 90%
I think i`ve spent A LOT of time traveling in cars.
100% have no basis in reality or are heavily skewed to get a message accross alone. Sad truths.