Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
From the proper reference frame, it does.
However, 16 million is still not far back enough...
Nah..I`ve got a cold. Bring it!
Where have you been?
Meh, I`d rather get my daily luls on IAB..."
What argument? It`s well on it`s way to being proven!
Ok..so it,s not "full" life in some peoples eyes but RNA is without doubt,what simplest self-replicating structures are made from..and without that facility you cant have life!
Not a bad breakthrough and we can only progress from here!
Ummm..I dont know how to tell you this but this is old news! The original press release back in 96 was a big thing! Since you where both kiddies back then you can be forgiven for not knowing!
Basically (as I said) there was a big press release and everybody went "ooo" and "ahhh" then another buch of scientists came out and claimed it wasnt proof, wasnt from Mars or even a fossil etc etc.
Basically they`ve been testing it to death since then and nothing has been able to disprove what was originally claimed!
Anyway..I remember Clinton making a big deal about it on TV at the time...and it was a big deal but like anything else in the scientific community, the nay sayers came out and it promptly went into "It`s a theory" catagory and was promoptly forgotten by millions!
Fact is, untill someone lands on Mars and finds proof it will remain an open subject. Still..the fact there is ice on Mars is a good sign!