Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
She didn`t, she started on the left and had to move onto the right.
Remember that time when art was about talent? Those were the days....
Now if he could eat his own fat...
If the piece can stand alone without the statement, it is art. If the piece is meaningless without the statement, it is not art.
Think about it - can you fully appreciate and understand a painting by Michelangelo without someone explaining it to you? Of course! Michelangelo knew how to convey messages, emotions, ideas in his art. That is why his works have withstood the test of time.
Can you fully appreciate and understand a guy drinking blood without him telling you it is to critique society? Of course not!! Without his message, it is just a guy trolling for attention. That is not art.
that 2 gallons of blood doesnt have to be taken from only one person. sixteen people could each give an eighth of a gallon of blood, or some not deadly amount.
He obviously had some in his mouth as to let it trickle down his chin for effect though.
A) Who found out this number? and with enough `tests` to prove its a common limit?
B) what -can- you drink more than two gallons of in a short time without some sort of adverse affects? Or am I imagining a greater quantity than two gallons?
C) Wouldn`t removing just part of that from anyone be hazardous?
But good/worthwhile art? Not even close.
and @ "You can only drink like two gallons of blood before you become sick."
Really? *Just* two gallons?
I don`t see how this will combat society issues either, but good for him.