Dracula, Frankenstein and Zombies [Graph]

Submitted by: Fancys_Asst 7 years ago Funny

What do these three fellows have in common? You probably won"t be shocked if you"re a regular of I-A-B...
There are 86 comments:
Female 106
LAWL I inked this to my uber Christian friend and he was all offendedface :)
0
Reply
Male 10
Dracula was a Transylvanian prince. He was also a real person Vlad Dracul of Romania. Do an online search, you will see about the real person and the fictional character.
0
Reply
Male 172
loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
0
Reply
Male 5
and bingo was his name-o!
0
Reply
Male 1,646
@Novem006
no Dracula was the son of the devil and sent here on earth as is. he was never human.
0
Reply
Male 308
BAHAHAHAHAHA
0
Reply
Female 700
wait... wasn`t dracula technically raised from the dead to?
0
Reply
Male 4,547
And yeah, I probably do enjoy these exchanges a little too much.
0
Reply
Male 4,547
Well see here`s the thing, you don`t need a new term for your religious affiliation, it`s still (I`d assume) atheism.

What you`re looking at there is your epistemology and you don`t need to give it a name.

Religion and Epistemology are not necessarily related.

0
Reply
Female 150
Yay religious debates! :D
0
Reply
Male 264
May simply be influenced with good old fashioned social conditioning.

Lets say for example if there were a hell of a lot of 13-17 year olds on a site that posts 3 anti-religious posts a day (usually devoid of fact, reason, argument).

Just as an example.

Which I concede to you is no basis for a belief system. All ideas should be weighed equally before making a decision. And decisions ought to be reconsidered in light of new discoveries.

sorry for touching a nerve, jeez

actually scratch that, i have a feeling you enjoy these exchanges a little too much

0
Reply
Male 264
I apologize then for my improper use of the label atheist. Even though it does apply to myself it is too vague a term for me to use it as a basis of argument in support of my belief system.

Therefore, bash atheism all you want, I no longer care, as I am in need of a new name for my religious affiliation (or specific kind of lack thereof).

0
Reply
Male 4,547
(Continued)
You really don`t see how ignorant a statement like that is?

You clearly didn`t like the tables being turned. You got upset. Yet still didn`t concede the point.

Worst of all, you`re talking about Atheism as the sole result of facts, as if your average Atheist is a Philosophy and Theology scholar, and that this is the way Atheists are made.

Whilst that thought may make you feel all warm inside, I feel that quite a few, I`m going out on a limb here:

May simply be influenced with good old fashioned social conditioning.

Lets say for example if there were a hell of a lot of 13-17 year olds on a site that posts 3 anti-religious posts a day (usually devoid of fact, reason, argument).

Just as an example.

0
Reply
Male 4,547
Fact 1: The defintion of Atheist is: "One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods."
Fact 2: No definition of Atheist is: "Has chosen to make an informed decision based on facts"
Fact 3: An Atheist is in no way shape or form reliant on your definition of atheist for whether they are a "good atheist" or a "bad atheist".
Fact 4: Facts are not, as you suggest, an Atheist`s "Bible". There is no required reading for Atheism.
Fact 5: The scientific method, does not preclude theism.
Fact 6: Facts, are still not "possessed" even by those who believe in the Scientific Method.

Opinion 1: You claim I misuse the word "fact" by claiming it can be possessed and then claim facts are possessed.

Opinion 2: The main point of the previous poster was "How would you like it if you were called ignorant". You basically responded with "Well that`s different, cos we`re not ignorant".

0
Reply
Male 264
Baalthazaq:

If something is truly a fact of the universe then it is not something to be possessed by any one group, otherwise it`s more of an opinion.

In other words, the facts that you say atheists claim to "possess" are in fact possessed by anyone who chooses to believe in the validity of the scientific method. I`ll go out on a limb here and claim that this group includes the majority of atheists and religious folk alike.

I`m not claiming superiority nor am I trying to bash Christianity. I`m just saying that any atheist who can be deemed "ignorant of the facts" isn`t a very good atheist and is comparable to a christian who hasn`t read the bible.

Atheism != Ignorance

0
Reply
Male 4,547
Nurcowski:

Atheists are to facts, as are internet commentators to massive penises.

Simply because they claim ad infinitum to be the sole possessors of said latters, it does not make it the case.

0
Reply
Male 264
wrexsoull: How would all you atheists like it if Fancy Lad was always posting links about why atheists are so stupid and ignorant?

I`m not sure that`s relevant as ignorance is more commonly associated with religion than atheism. I mean how can you call someone ignorant who has chosen to make an informed decision based on facts as opposed to ancient literature?

0
Reply
Male 191
I`m a Christian but as far as what this is going by... Not entirely wrong.
0
Reply
Male 86
I don`t appreciated being called a mindless follower. I am tired of flame wars because nobody wins in one, but I don`t like all these blatant jabs at Christianity all the time. How would all you atheists like it if Fancy Lad was always posting links about why atheists are so stupid and ignorant?
0
Reply
Male 21
Jesus was a cun... t.
0
Reply
Female 89
Makes sense
0
Reply
Male 1,067
I totally didn`t expect this but I`m actually not shocked.
0
Reply
Male 39
I`m not sure Dracula was out to convert as many ppl as possible. I think he was just hungry.
0
Reply
Male 4,547
Screwz, are you perchance suggesting that there is a contender somewhere outside of Asia?
0
Reply
Male 592
SWEET ZOMBIE JESUS!
0
Reply
Male 384
yeah, cobra, dont try to out a**-hole baal- dont you know there is no bigger a-hole in asia?
0
Reply
Female 126
Baha <3 awesome indeed
0
Reply
Male 819
Awesome!
0
Reply
Male 10,440
[quote] Basically: If it mocks Christianity, you`ll all jump on the bandwagon and go "I KNOW! TOTALLY! LOL!"

Talk about mindless followers [/quote]

... followers of what exactly?

If you are mindless to begin with, its better to not believe than it is to believe.

0
Reply
Male 4,547
Erm, don`t try and out-a**hole me cobra, that is a losing battle. :)

Frankie never called him anything in the novel, making him effectively nameless.

The Monster called himself "The Adam of your Labours", referencing Adam of the Bible, but not actually naming himself Adam.

0
Reply
Male 7,585
im sorry to be the a**hole, but frankensteins monster actually had a name. it was adam, named after the first man in the bible.
0
Reply
Female 3,828
lol. im not shocked at all.

awesomeness.

0
Reply
Male 4,547
Tired:
It`s unlikely he looked Arabic any more than Jews look Arab to begin with.

Whilst there`s a strong argument he spoke Aramaic rather than Hebrew, even in Islamic sources he is Jewish by race (though effectively Muslim by religion).

There`s no reason I can think of he`d be Arab in a way that would affect his looks, unless discussing some obscure terminology.

His parentage (even if you regard him as fictional) is descended from Isaac, not Ishmael, even on his step-father`s line, which means the racial definitions make him solely Jewish.

Even if you want to argue "Jew is a religion, not a race", he is still generically a Semite, and still not Arab.

(Taking into consideration I spent 2 years writing a paper on comparisons of Jesus in different religions, including non denominational studies, and never came across a well established version of that theory, I`d really like to know your source).

0
Reply
Male 4,547
Heh, fair point.
Dr. Frankenstein is the name of the Dr. who built the monster.
"Frankenstein`s Monster" is the actual name for the monster, you are quite right.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
Crawdaddy197: Or Arabic?
0
Reply
Male 1,093
isnt frankenstein the doctor? I didnt know he was resurrected from the dead.
0
Reply
Male 352
Hey guys I`m making fun of Christians.
0
Reply
Male 363
i-a-b is full of wins lately.
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Talkabout mindless charts!
0
Reply
Male 353
"before you comment on jesus he is real and the others in the graph as i died 3 times and met him in a near death experience so i know he is real"

You didn`t give him M&M`s did you. That woulda been mean. Him not being able to hold them in his hands and all.

So, when you met him was he blond haired and blue eyed, or did he look jewish?

0
Reply
Male 1,081
Zombie + Frankenstein + Dracula = Jesus

I`ve got to say, Lowmaxx`s post seems incredibly crazy.

0
Reply
Female 5
ORLY? Jesus once told me to skip church and watch American Pie. ;D

0
Reply
Male 26
before you comment on jesus he is real and the others in the graph as i died 3 times and met him in a near death experience so i know he is real
0
Reply
Male 4,547
Negative one:
She said "Dracula rose from the dead".
You said "Undead".

Ah, good point. Except for the placement of Zombies, which if you`re not counting undead as "Rose from the dead" they`re out of place too.

Basically: If it mocks Christianity, you`ll all jump on the bandwagon and go "I KNOW! TOTALLY! LOL!"

Talk about mindless followers.

0
Reply
Male 1,164
Wow, when you think about it like that, Jesus must`ve been pretty freaky.
0
Reply
Male 1,704
JC is still cnter of attention!
0
Reply
Female 275
awww :q lol
0
Reply
Male 98
sooo, Jesus is a Vampensteinbie?
0
Reply
Male 4,393
lolz
0
Reply
Male 56
*nods* Very true if you think about it... although i think Dracula (Vlad Tepes) should be right under Jesus... because he is part of the undead... but a good one for where Dracula is would be a Serial Killer, (like Charles Manson)
0
Reply
Male 736
lol
0
Reply
Male 150
So true.
0
Reply
Male 98
I`ve been saying this for years and being escorted of many a premises for it...
0
Reply
Male 1,045
i`m gonna show this to my elderly aunt.
altough you forgot cannibals.
0
Reply
Female 159
*nod* interesting, indeed!
0
Reply
Female 2,352
XD Zombjesusstien!! What a a clusterf^ck.
0
Reply
Male 712
Zombies convert some pretty intelligent people into brainless flesh eaters pretty easily with only one bite. Dracula also does the same but his victims tend to keep their minds and develop some awesome abilities. Frankenstein would probably just keep biting people...and failing to frighten Christopher Walken any more than marsupials.
0
Reply
Male 601
Makes sense.
0
Reply
Male 5,314
very interesting
0
Reply
Female 1,306
so very true.
0
Reply
Male 2,582
"Dracula rose from the dead. Epic fail."
--------------------------------------------
Undead.
0
Reply
Male 7,585
never thought of it that way, but pretty true. but f*ck the graph for snubbing werewolves.
0
Reply
Male 219
Yes, zombies FTW!!!!
0
Reply
Female 94
haha! ..thats cool
0
Reply
Female 15,763
ZOMBIES ARE BETTER.
0
Reply
Male 58
although slightly sacreligious, it`s still extremely funny, hope no flame wars come of this post.
0
Reply
Female 635
Dracula rose from the dead. Epic fail.
Either way... Very funny! :P
0
Reply
Male 76
That was... amazing
0
Reply
Male 1,357
hahahaha
0
Reply
Male 360
thats pretty dang impressive
0
Reply
Male 2,440
[quote]This deserves a zero.[/quote]

CrakrJak, get the stick out of your a$$ and have a sense of humor.

0
Reply
Male 66
there`s only one word to describe this
perfect, utterly beautiful
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Wow! I am impressed. That... makes perfect sense actually.
0
Reply
Male 3,619
perfect
0
Reply
Female 2,509
i`m going to hell. that was funny
0
Reply
Male 328
Awesome
0
Reply
Female 3,598
nice. just beautiful. i love it.
0
Reply
Male 1,484
haha, that was mint!
0
Reply
Male 815
wow...it all makes perfect sense now!!! lol
0
Reply
Male 29
Pretty clever yo.
0
Reply
Male 397
wow so true
0
Reply
Male 144
Teehee yeah its true
0
Reply
Male 2,841
Sad but true...
0
Reply
Male 346
haha, thats hilarious
0
Reply
Male 17,512
This deserves a zero.
0
Reply
Female 1,780
Link: Dracula, Frankenstein and Zombies [Graph] [Rate Link] - What do these three fellows have in common? You probably won`t be shocked if you`re a regular of I-A-B...
0
Reply