Marge Simpson in Playboy [Pics and Questionnaire]

Submitted by: Matwix_2004 7 years ago in Weird
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/40203972.html#cutid1

It"s the Playboy pictorial we"ve been waiting for. Check her out. Technically NSFW due to veiled cartoon areola.
There are 77 comments:
Male 1,485
broken
0
Reply
Female 864
Considering the Simpsons, like Family Guy, ISN`T MADE FOR CHILDREN.... I don`t see why it`d matter.

I don`t really think that Simpsons and Family Guy are comparable plus if you look at all the Simpsons products it is totally marketed towards children ,pretty sure i won`t be getting a Family Guy toy with my happy meal any time soon.


0
Reply
Male 734
I wanna see Lois from Family Guy in the buff instead!
0
Reply
Female 4,447
I knew I forgot to pick something up when I was at Borders today. Damnit.
0
Reply
Male 720
This is just retarded. But then again I haven`t really come to expect anything else from the Simpsons since 1999...
0
Reply
Female 1,427
"The interview was a bit naff, but the pics were very, er, Playboy...

This is a joke, right? People surely aren`t twisted enough to actually put a cartoon character familiar to children on the front of Playboy? Or do previous cover stars include Betty Boop, Lola Bunny and that one from "Who Framed Roger Rabbit"? "

Considering the Simpsons, like Family Guy, ISN`T MADE FOR CHILDREN.... I don`t see why it`d matter.

0
Reply
Male 2,159
The interview was a bit naff, but the pics were very, er, Playboy...

This is a joke, right? People surely aren`t twisted enough to actually put a cartoon character familiar to children on the front of Playboy? Or do previous cover stars include Betty Boop, Lola Bunny and that one from "Who Framed Roger Rabbit"?

0
Reply
Male 174
Margie is kinda hot
0
Reply
Male 12
Hubba Hubba.

I lol`d at the one with the shadow of Homer! xD

0
Reply
Male 107
I think it`s weird that the nipples seem to be flesh colored.
0
Reply
Female 877
;__; me heart hurtz.. why marge? WHY??!!
0
Reply
Male 3,425
OMGZ CARTOON BEWBZ!!1!!11
0
Reply
Female 1,199
I am really... Disturbed.... O_O
0
Reply
Male 3,619
i spy nipples :D
0
Reply
Female 262
I wonder why they don`t have chicks pose with beer and doughnuts in the real nudie magazines...
0
Reply
Female 854
He he Look at Homer`s shadow.
0
Reply
Male 277
*facepalm*
0
Reply
Female 250
I don`t know how she could forget her lipstick for her Playboy debut!
0
Reply
Female 163
Id buy the Louis Griffin issue
0
Reply
Female 1,593
I`m impressed.
0
Reply
Male 494
I`ll never think of the Simpsons the same way again.
0
Reply
Male 152
Hair is to phallic to get anyone off
0
Reply
Male 15,832
Homer is one lucky bastard!
0
Reply
Male 1,666
That... is... so hot.
0
Reply
Male 9,306
She pulls off a wonderfully classy "sexy".
0
Reply
Female 850
this is just drating weird.
0
Reply
Female 846
ha ha that was awesome!!
0
Reply
Male 157
so...this is what playboy has come to next it`ll be tentacle rape porn and we`ll be no better then Japan.
0
Reply
Male 516
"the simpsons stopped being relevant about 10 years ago..."

Hence the appearance in Playboy. How many other irrelevant figures have posed in those pages?

0
Reply
Female 1,441
I never thought I`d see a link to ONTD here.

For any girls here, it`s the best site ever.

0
Reply
Male 4,004
"should have sticked* would still be wrong. should have *stuck* would STILL be wrong. the word "stick" here is analogous (in this usage) to the word "stay." you don`t stay *to*, but with something."

In your valiant efforts to sound smart, you said "stuck" wouldn`t work, even though in your example you used "stuck". The fact is, "stuck" works. It is the work "to" that didn`t work. You ought to have pointed out "stuck to" didn`t fit in, and not simply "stuck".

Either way, it was an exquisitely horrendous sentence fail prior to the changes.

Canadian school systems FTW (and I went to a French school my whole life)

0
Reply
Male 807
i want this playboy!
0
Reply
Female 230
I feel...violated for some reason. ]: Cartoons shouldn`t be showing areolas, either. Gee.
0
Reply
Male 370
the simpsons stopped being relevant about 10 years ago...
0
Reply
Male 4,594
I don`t get the "Marge Simpson in Playboy" thing. I just don`t see the fascination with it. Now, if they put Erin E-surance chick in the magazine, I`ll buy a copy in a second.
0
Reply
Female 131
@5Cats

thats because Bugs Bunny is a BUNNY!!!

0
Reply
Male 37,885
Bugs Bunny wore white gloves, a Smirk and nothing else for all those years, no one made a big deal about it...
0
Reply
Female 665
Woah woah woah guys! Shouldn`t we be talking about Marge`s huge cartoon boobies?
0
Reply
Male 976
WAH-WAH-WEE-WAH!!
0
Reply
Male 20,196
Why did I assume that her nipples would be blue?
0
Reply
Female 1,677
No I`m arguing that some choices are not `personal choices` at all, like the `choices` that end up with you submitting to the oppressor in the way they would like you to regardless of how you end up there. These are re-packaged as `personal choices` or `empowering`, when really it`s submission, but it`s more fun if you think you`ve chosen it for yourself.

But something like me deciding to eat peanut butter for breakfast is all me yo.

0
Reply
Male 975
boa uve created an argument that cant be argued..by ur logic every personal choice is a choice made by others
0
Reply
Female 1,677
Uh see that`s where they get you. "It`s not exploitation when I`m the one exploiting myself!" Yes, yes it is, you`ve just been brainwashed into doing the dirty work for them. It`s still slavery if the slave chooses to serve.
0
Reply
Female 3,828
so awesome
0
Reply
Female 723
LOL! Her measurements are 26-26-26...making her nothing more than a couple of parallel lines. 2d joke?
0
Reply
Male 15,510
Lets admit we all see this coming
0
Reply
Female 15,763
I`m just saying, Boa, that a lot of women feel degraded not by marketing themselves as sexual objects, but by the people who think they shouldn`t be allowed to make that decision for themselves.

Of course this argument is sort of null and void when the woman in question is a cartoon character... >_>

0
Reply
Female 1,677
When women are marketed as sexual objects it`s a bad thing. And in the western world that=sexuality.

Make of that what you will.

0
Reply
Female 15,763
Way to go Sharp, taking a jerk like Shun *glares* and responding with courtesy.
0
Reply
Female 3,562
One step closer to American hentai magazines?
In a way, I figure cartoon porn is a lot more moral than real porn, as no one actually gets exploited. But it`s a lot worse for your sanity, because it`s so far from reality.
0
Reply
Male 1,765
"american school systems ftl."

I`m not American, and English is my second language. If you were trying to help me, thanks. I knew it was wrong, grammatically, but I wasn`t sure how it was supposed to be written so I though "meh, this is the internet".
The point is The Simpsons is but a sad shadow of what it used to be :-( I`ll stick with (:-)) other cartoon shows

0
Reply
Female 15,763
Boa, sexuality doesn`t always have to be a bad thing.

Lazy, don`t you know? It got cleared for 2 more eason. Same writers, same actors, everything.

0
Reply
Male 2,440
Marge has some sweet ti-... donuts.
0
Reply
Male 4,746
Woo Hoo!
0
Reply
Female 1,677
Well I guess they grew tired of sexualizing every live woman, they had to resort to sexualizing fricking cartoon characters. I`m disgusted that the Simpsons writers et all allowed this poo.
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Nah. The Simpsons aint` dead. They`re just not "the best". But then again, Family guy, American Dad, Futurama etc. they`re not that great either.

... I miss futurama.

0
Reply
Female 349
Ahaha, I like the one where she`s taking off her dress and you can see the silluette of Homer on the right. XD
0
Reply
Male 1,381
poon beat me to it!
0
Reply
Male 1,381
"should`ve stick"

should have sticked* would still be wrong. should have *stuck* would STILL be wrong. the word "stick" here is analogous (in this usage) to the word "stay." you don`t stay *to*, but with something.

"You should have stuck with good episode writing."

american school systems ftl.

0
Reply
Male 194
Also, shouldn`t her nipples be orange or something?
0
Reply
Male 194
"Are The Simpsons getting this desperate for attention? Get over it: your show is dead. You should`ve stick to good episode writing."
Lol, you should`ve stick to good writing.

0
Reply
Female 526
WHORE!!
0
Reply
Female 9,478
I have no words.
0
Reply
Male 1,190
Toons are good for people into S&M, you can beat the hell out of them and nothing happens, just don`t spill turpentine, acetone or benzene on them and everything is fine!
I`d like a nice session or two with marge!!
0
Reply
Male 819
I think it`s pretty cool that playboy did this. Then again, if anyone uses this as masturbation material that`s pretty sick... But great tribute to a great show.
0
Reply
Female 1,004
...I think I read somewhere that this was done because Hugh Hefner had a thing for Marge. I unno.
I think it`s silly to have a cartoon in a magazine like that... But oh well. Whatever works.
0
Reply
Male 7,611
very tastfully done. i thought they were going to get a little nasty with it.
0
Reply
Male 1,765
Are The Simpsons getting this desperate for attention? Get over it: your show is dead. You should`ve stick to good episode writing.
0
Reply
Female 838
I can`t help but think that they should have done ones with the wet flat hair? Does anyone know what I`m talking about?
0
Reply
Male 25,416
Looking good for her age!
0
Reply
Female 1,386
Personally I think its pretty dumb. *shrug* Thats just me. I`m pretty sure anyone interested in seeing Marge nude has an interweb full of ammo. Don`t see what the big deal is about this, other than it being "official".
0
Reply
Male 5,094
Well, for quality, this sure beats Playdude.
0
Reply
Female 15
I wonder how many guys on IAB are fapping to this. 0.0`` Gross
0
Reply
Female 190
Hmm. I never considered that Marge had nipples before.
0
Reply
Male 198
Too bad that smoker`s voice turns me off...
0
Reply
Male 198
Marge is too sexy for homer.
0
Reply
Male 2,551
Link: Marge Simpson in Playboy [Pics and Questionnaire] [Rate Link] - It`s the Playboy pictorial we`ve been waiting for. Check her out. Technically NSFW due to veiled cartoon areola.
0
Reply