The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 38    Average: 3.9/5]
70 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 16671
Rating: 3.9
Category:
Date: 10/15/09 07:03 AM

70 Responses to Manchester Airport`s `Naked` Scanners [Video]

  1. Profile photo of Beachin_Jeep
    Beachin_Jeep Male 30-39
    133 posts
    October 14, 2009 at 7:03 pm
    Link: Manchester Airport`s `Naked` Scanners - Airport security just got a whole lot sexier.
  2. Profile photo of cobrakiller
    cobrakiller Male 18-29
    7470 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:19 am
    yeah, no physical pat down, but hell lets see what you look like naked. you could definitely see that guys junk a little.
  3. Profile photo of Tiredofnicks
    Tiredofnicks Male 30-39
    5097 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:19 am
    I was hoping she`d get in.
  4. Profile photo of a1butcher
    a1butcher Male 40-49
    4809 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:23 am
    Awww that`s just Nuts
  5. Profile photo of Pooptart19
    Pooptart19 Male 18-29
    2441 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:26 am
    This is wrong on so many levels.
  6. Profile photo of IvanWnKenobi
    IvanWnKenobi Male 13-17
    15 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:27 am
    yeah sure put a man as an example!!!
  7. Profile photo of hwkiller
    hwkiller Male 18-29
    490 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:31 am
    Totally against this. I heard about this last year, and it`s a 100% invasion of privacy.

    How many criminals are they going to catch with this?
    How many innocent civilians will be seen naked?

    These things ALWAYS affect the innocent ones more than any criminal.

    What was the latest statistic about the patriot act`s methods of national security? Last I saw, they had literally caught NO CRIMINALS trying to hurt someone (in america, of course). On the other hand, thousands of people have been strip searched, forced off of flights, etc... for nothing.
    When they "randomly" select a 12 year old girl to search, and then strip search... (wtf, yea, that`s happened a few times)

  8. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:35 am
    I`d so much rather be pat down than have everything on display.
  9. Profile photo of Rick_S
    Rick_S Male 40-49
    3282 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:36 am
    I think that it`s an option that you can take instead of emptying your pockets and being pat down. Personally, I`d take the empty the pockets and get pat down technique myself. I`d take the "hassle" over the invasion.
  10. Profile photo of banjolegs
    banjolegs Male 30-39
    176 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:51 am
    AAAAaaaargh. Thank you.
    How can this really be anything other that an overbearing need to prove innocence when presumed guilty?
  11. Profile photo of jez83uk
    jez83uk Male 18-29
    43 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 7:55 am
    The idea is that the person viewing the xray doesn`t even see you, but that they can alert guards if they see anything wrong.
    I`ll use it even if if someone does see my rooster.
  12. Profile photo of Subushie
    Subushie Male 18-29
    1646 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 8:09 am
    how in the hell is this less intrusive? im ok with the pat down thank you, i dont want airport security men rating the size of my dick. or my girlfriends breasts.
  13. Profile photo of Sigon
    Sigon Male 18-29
    129 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 8:17 am
    I have no problem with this technology...so what if some dude see`s your poo...he`s also going to have to see the poo of every other person that goes through there...and lets be honest...after a while that will get old...sure they`ll get "excited" each time a young teenage girl goes through there, but he will also have to deal with all the obese men, elderly women and men...etc

    fact is, people worry about "invasion of Privacy" way too much when it will likely be not warranted. Plus if this technology stops just one plane from being taken over, or one life is saved, I would say that is worth the cost of some person you will never see seeing a blurred image of your junk...

  14. Profile photo of Kraehe
    Kraehe Male 18-29
    7 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 8:25 am
    Imagine having some pieces of metal under your shirt that spell out "f*** you" :D
  15. Profile photo of Aus10816
    Aus10816 Male 18-29
    639 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 8:29 am
    >how in the hell is this less intrusive? im ok with the pat down thank you, i dont want airport security men rating the size of my dick. or my girlfriends breasts.<

    Someone`s a little insecure and overprotective.

  16. Profile photo of MrAnonymous
    MrAnonymous Male 18-29
    216 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 8:30 am
    i agree subushie. Id rather be patted down than be seen naked. Last thing I need is a horny Security Guard looking at my wife. Or worse. my daughter.
  17. Profile photo of Matwix_2004
    Matwix_2004 Male 18-29
    2551 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 9:11 am
    So...are there any jobs going at Manchester Airport then? :D
  18. Profile photo of BrimstoneOne
    BrimstoneOne Male 30-39
    2229 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 9:20 am
    The next step towards "total recall"`s walk thru scanner. To evade this devise is really quite simple really, surgery, if one want to go "suicidal" and evade detection. Instead of carrying a `weapon` on the outside the body, carry it on the inside. This would also foil a `pat down` as well.
    My apologies if this ups ones paranoia level, but if it any consultation, one would have to totally drated up and have a large cash reserve to pull this one way ticket off.
  19. Profile photo of sfcg
    sfcg Male 30-39
    796 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 9:54 am
    Of course they have some chubby dude do it.
  20. Profile photo of Listypoos
    Listypoos Male 40-49
    3069 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 9:55 am
    is it actually more effective than a manual search or just quicker and easier?

    if it`s a lot more effective, then i`m for it.... but if it`s just a case of it being more convenient for the airlines so they can squeeze more passengers through then i`d be against it. Life moves fast enough as it is these days...we should be slowing things down not trying to go faster everywhere.

  21. Profile photo of sonikku
    sonikku Male 18-29
    350 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:08 am
    why don`t you show us yourself, sweetie? ^^
  22. Profile photo of OmgZelda
    OmgZelda Female 18-29
    1593 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:22 am
    Less intrusive than a physical pat down? Really? Hmm...I dunno you taking naked pictures of me fully clothed. Definitely not intrusive.
  23. Profile photo of loadstar
    loadstar Male 30-39
    307 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:31 am
    "Thank you for your co-operation sir, just step right though. You might want to get that thing on your nards looked at BTW. Also, your camera is crap, I had one just like it. Have a nice day. Enjoy your scrambled credit cards. NEXT!"
  24. Profile photo of TopperHey
    TopperHey Male 18-29
    1930 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:39 am
    Must be stressed that this is OPTIONAL. Traditional security is still there for people who feel uncomfortable.

    Personally I will be using this the next time I go on holiday.

  25. Profile photo of msieg007
    msieg007 Male 18-29
    2035 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:58 am
    I`d like to see her in that machine.
  26. Profile photo of techgeek07
    techgeek07 Male 30-39
    2593 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 11:16 am
    I`d like to pat her down
  27. Profile photo of revdrdark
    revdrdark Male 40-49
    691 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 11:20 am
    Aw lame we see the fat guy and not the hot roosterney chick? And this is sexy? Mayhap you liked his little package?
  28. Profile photo of eggy409
    eggy409 Male 40-49
    24 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 11:26 am
    I`m packin` a 12-inch dildo if I have to through.
  29. Profile photo of Joolin
    Joolin Male 18-29
    1002 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 12:04 pm
    I just like the fact that they did this specifically to be LESS intrusive.
  30. Profile photo of BABY_BEAR
    BABY_BEAR Female 18-29
    1395 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 12:51 pm
    Ok, i`m never travelling by plane again (at least, not from that airport) and it depends who`s doing the pat down; i think we should be presented with a line up to choose who we`d like to pat us down, one with a Ryan Gosling look-a-like option preferably. O and i`d like my pat down from behind o.O thanks.
  31. Profile photo of chrisfalcon
    chrisfalcon Male 18-29
    169 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 1:05 pm
    @revdrdark: "roosterny"... gotta love useless censorship. lol

    One of the few jobs in which, on a good day, you spend all day looking at blue porn. Niiiiice.

  32. Profile photo of Freelop
    Freelop Male 18-29
    442 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 1:26 pm
    I was through that airport last month, the security isn`t that bad to get through.

    Less intrusive by seeing me pretty much naked, makes total sense. Unless of course this is a clever idea to show people what could be implemented to stop them moaning about what there already is.

  33. Profile photo of ChrisMunich
    ChrisMunich Male 18-29
    383 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 1:48 pm
    I`m not sure if this is exactly less intrusive, but according to what i read it is

    A) Optional
    B) More efficient
    C) The person viewing the scans is not even in the same area, and as such can`t see you `in real life`, and do you really think someone is going to perv over those images?

  34. Profile photo of radmikey
    radmikey Male 18-29
    61 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 1:52 pm
    I`ll let you scan me anyday...
  35. Profile photo of CreweAlex
    CreweAlex Male 18-29
    76 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 1:56 pm
    I gotta go through that in January, and in July. They will see my shamefully tiny penis twice.
  36. Profile photo of DarthJay
    DarthJay Male 30-39
    339 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 2:48 pm
    Why did we have to see the dude...?
  37. Profile photo of Fatninja01
    Fatninja01 Male 30-39
    25420 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 2:58 pm
    IF you live in aus and saw the story! thy dis this on females and you do see everything inc tits and vag`s!
  38. Profile photo of JJXanadu
    JJXanadu Male 30-39
    516 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 3:07 pm
    You stay classy, Fatninja01...
  39. Profile photo of SaltyVarnish
    SaltyVarnish Male 18-29
    678 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 3:32 pm
    I demand a woman be scanned i was hoping for the reporter chick.
  40. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3431 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 3:41 pm
    Ahh screw it, I`ll walk.
  41. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 4:49 pm
    did anyone else notice how her skin went all acaly at like :50 ?
  42. Profile photo of SmilinSam
    SmilinSam Female 18-29
    3599 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 4:49 pm
    *scaly
  43. Profile photo of Mr_Chubbles
    Mr_Chubbles Female 13-17
    288 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 5:17 pm
    And being viewed naked by airport security ISN`T intrusive?
  44. Profile photo of Dfaulted
    Dfaulted Male 13-17
    1920 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 6:07 pm
    Damn its a fat guy!
  45. Profile photo of Corpsecrank
    Corpsecrank Male 30-39
    930 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 6:53 pm
    The skin is just a problem with the video and the way it was encoded. Just to answer the scaly skin thing.

    But seriously if your more afraid of someone seeing you naked with xray imaging than being felt up by some weirdo security guard then you got some issues going on there. I would rather be seen in the xray personally.

    Wonder what they would do if you walked into the booth with something over your junk so they couldn`t actually see it. Like some tinfoil or something. Bet that would be interesting.

  46. Profile photo of MauserTM
    MauserTM Male 18-29
    1222 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 8:39 pm
    I love her
  47. Profile photo of saintnick
    saintnick Male 13-17
    270 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 9:17 pm
    cept when they show you & your naked self to millions online
  48. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:06 pm
    did i just see a fatman sack??
  49. Profile photo of Crabcakes
    Crabcakes Male 30-39
    226 posts
    October 15, 2009 at 10:22 pm
    Heh, there was a flap about this in the US a few years ago. It`s called Backscatter X-rays, and the big issue was apparently the fact that you`re seen in the nude.

    Personally, I`d rather this than have some closet pickle-washer feeling up my junk. If they`re bent enough to be rubbing one out to my fat ass with a nasty mono-blue tint, more power to them.

  50. Profile photo of kittilia
    kittilia Female 18-29
    500 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 12:34 am
    oh yeah. cuz I`d definitely rather have someone see through my clothes than do a little pat down.
  51. Profile photo of alpha8te
    alpha8te Male 30-39
    71 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 1:48 am
    That dude had a thong. That`s why I don`t fly anymore. Drive or take a boat. drat the airlines and their searching you. Besides I can drive far more dank then I could fly.
  52. Profile photo of jez83uk
    jez83uk Male 18-29
    43 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 3:16 am
    For everyone who wanted to see a woman in it:
  53. Profile photo of salem33466
    salem33466 Male 18-29
    153 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 3:29 am
    total nutshot....like we really wanna see british people naked.
  54. Profile photo of Scott_2150
    Scott_2150 Male 18-29
    801 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 6:55 am
    I`d rather be patted down than have some airport security staff look at 3D models of my dong...
  55. Profile photo of ozami
    ozami Male 40-49
    1 post
    October 16, 2009 at 8:16 am
    I think this is fantastic (as long as I am the one looking at the image) of women only please :)
  56. Profile photo of Englandrocks
    Englandrocks Female 18-29
    491 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 8:23 am
    Hopefully there will be an exception for children....
  57. Profile photo of pastygumba
    pastygumba Male 30-39
    3 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 9:27 am
    I see a new fetish of perverts trying to get erections before they get scanned coming down the pike.
  58. Profile photo of ranon
    ranon Male 18-29
    295 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 12:56 pm
    Since it is such a hassle free experience, let the girl talking go through the scanners and show us the results.
  59. Profile photo of rev_felix
    rev_felix Male 13-17
    3 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 1:21 pm
    Let`s see her use the thing, I don`t want naked fat men.
  60. Profile photo of Ria25
    Ria25 Female 18-29
    125 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 3:49 pm
    Yes, because getting patted down is far worse then security seeing you naked.
  61. Profile photo of MetalLinx
    MetalLinx Female 13-17
    257 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 5:45 pm
    lol this will just invoke perverts into this
  62. Profile photo of michaelcsr
    michaelcsr Male 40-49
    559 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 8:17 pm
    What about the insecurity of having to show my schlong to complete strangers?
  63. Profile photo of nanocubine
    nanocubine Male 13-17
    33 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 9:20 pm
    Yesterday, 5,000 72 year old men applied for a job at Manchester Airport.
  64. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 10:00 pm
    Reminds me of a revelation I had yesterday: the entire Female mystique depends upon a worldwide conspiracy to keep every pair of tits from being exposed, at least once, under globally accessible circumstances.

    On the other hand, spectacles like Girls Gone Wild aren`t just seedy forms of entertainment; they are a quest unto themselves. The quest is to capture as many women`s naughty hotties as possible, eventually spanning the entire globe across every conceivable demographic (exceeding that of 18 or over, for distribution in the US only) and exposing that superficial noose they`ve had around our neck ever since the establishment of the breasts as a (forbidden) erogenous zone.

    Once that happens, the most fundamental source of female empowerment will crumble, leaving their kind without the upper hand anymore and ours with the kind of blasé attitude to sexual encounters that formerly gave them their singularly aloof, elusive and (therefore) seductive demeanor.

  65. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    October 16, 2009 at 10:01 pm
    And I believe this device can bring that day closer to us.
    All hail ManChesterism.
  66. Profile photo of Slade8
    Slade8 Male 18-29
    951 posts
    October 17, 2009 at 11:43 am
    No NSFW tag on a video with (albeit low-quality, blue) testicles? For shame, IAB.
  67. Profile photo of Neagle
    Neagle Male 30-39
    1405 posts
    October 18, 2009 at 1:29 pm
    This is about as non-intrusive as a colonoscope.
  68. Profile photo of kimkio
    kimkio Female 18-29
    877 posts
    October 18, 2009 at 3:10 pm
    "I`d rather be patted down than have some airport security staff look at 3D models of my dong..." lolololll xD
  69. Profile photo of lukeforv123
    lukeforv123 Male 18-29
    1058 posts
    October 19, 2009 at 10:49 am
    She should have gotten in the machine rather than that frikin` bald dude
  70. Profile photo of Kagome1988
    Kagome1988 Female 18-29
    61 posts
    October 21, 2009 at 1:09 pm
    well i don`t think i`d like standing in one but i know what my next job is gonna be

Leave a Reply