Manchester Airport`s `Naked` Scanners [Video]

Submitted by: Beachin_Jeep 7 years ago in

Airport security just got a whole lot sexier.
There are 70 comments:
Female 61
well i don`t think i`d like standing in one but i know what my next job is gonna be
0
Reply
Male 1,068
She should have gotten in the machine rather than that frikin` bald dude
0
Reply
Female 877
"I`d rather be patted down than have some airport security staff look at 3D models of my dong..." lolololll xD
0
Reply
Male 1,404
This is about as non-intrusive as a colonoscope.
0
Reply
Male 949
No NSFW tag on a video with (albeit low-quality, blue) testicles? For shame, IAB.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
And I believe this device can bring that day closer to us.
All hail ManChesterism.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
Reminds me of a revelation I had yesterday: the entire Female mystique depends upon a worldwide conspiracy to keep every pair of tits from being exposed, at least once, under globally accessible circumstances.

On the other hand, spectacles like Girls Gone Wild aren`t just seedy forms of entertainment; they are a quest unto themselves. The quest is to capture as many women`s naughty hotties as possible, eventually spanning the entire globe across every conceivable demographic (exceeding that of 18 or over, for distribution in the US only) and exposing that superficial noose they`ve had around our neck ever since the establishment of the breasts as a (forbidden) erogenous zone.

Once that happens, the most fundamental source of female empowerment will crumble, leaving their kind without the upper hand anymore and ours with the kind of blasé attitude to sexual encounters that formerly gave them their singularly aloof, elusive and (therefore) seductive demeanor.

0
Reply
Male 33
Yesterday, 5,000 72 year old men applied for a job at Manchester Airport.
0
Reply
Male 559
What about the insecurity of having to show my schlong to complete strangers?
0
Reply
Female 257
lol this will just invoke perverts into this
0
Reply
Female 125
Yes, because getting patted down is far worse then security seeing you naked.
0
Reply
Male 3
Let`s see her use the thing, I don`t want naked fat men.
0
Reply
Male 295
Since it is such a hassle free experience, let the girl talking go through the scanners and show us the results.
0
Reply
Male 3
I see a new fetish of perverts trying to get erections before they get scanned coming down the pike.
0
Reply
Female 491
Hopefully there will be an exception for children....
0
Reply
Male 1
I think this is fantastic (as long as I am the one looking at the image) of women only please :)
0
Reply
Male 801
I`d rather be patted down than have some airport security staff look at 3D models of my dong...
0
Reply
Male 153
total nutshot....like we really wanna see british people naked.
0
Reply
Male 43
For everyone who wanted to see a woman in it:
0
Reply
Male 71
That dude had a thong. That`s why I don`t fly anymore. Drive or take a boat. drat the airlines and their searching you. Besides I can drive far more dank then I could fly.
0
Reply
Female 500
oh yeah. cuz I`d definitely rather have someone see through my clothes than do a little pat down.
0
Reply
Male 226
Heh, there was a flap about this in the US a few years ago. It`s called Backscatter X-rays, and the big issue was apparently the fact that you`re seen in the nude.

Personally, I`d rather this than have some closet pickle-washer feeling up my junk. If they`re bent enough to be rubbing one out to my fat ass with a nasty mono-blue tint, more power to them.

0
Reply
Male 4,793
did i just see a fatman sack??
0
Reply
Male 269
cept when they show you & your naked self to millions online
0
Reply
Male 1,222
I love her
0
Reply
Male 928
The skin is just a problem with the video and the way it was encoded. Just to answer the scaly skin thing.

But seriously if your more afraid of someone seeing you naked with xray imaging than being felt up by some weirdo security guard then you got some issues going on there. I would rather be seen in the xray personally.

Wonder what they would do if you walked into the booth with something over your junk so they couldn`t actually see it. Like some tinfoil or something. Bet that would be interesting.

0
Reply
Male 1,918
Damn its a fat guy!
0
Reply
Female 288
And being viewed naked by airport security ISN`T intrusive?
0
Reply
Female 3,598
*scaly
0
Reply
Female 3,598
did anyone else notice how her skin went all acaly at like :50 ?
0
Reply
Male 3,431
Ahh screw it, I`ll walk.
0
Reply
Male 678
I demand a woman be scanned i was hoping for the reporter chick.
0
Reply
Male 516
You stay classy, Fatninja01...
0
Reply
Male 25,416
IF you live in aus and saw the story! thy dis this on females and you do see everything inc tits and vag`s!
0
Reply
Male 339
Why did we have to see the dude...?
0
Reply
Male 76
I gotta go through that in January, and in July. They will see my shamefully tiny penis twice.
0
Reply
Male 61
I`ll let you scan me anyday...
0
Reply
Male 383
I`m not sure if this is exactly less intrusive, but according to what i read it is

A) Optional
B) More efficient
C) The person viewing the scans is not even in the same area, and as such can`t see you `in real life`, and do you really think someone is going to perv over those images?

0
Reply
Male 442
I was through that airport last month, the security isn`t that bad to get through.

Less intrusive by seeing me pretty much naked, makes total sense. Unless of course this is a clever idea to show people what could be implemented to stop them moaning about what there already is.

0
Reply
Male 169
@revdrdark: "roosterny"... gotta love useless censorship. lol

One of the few jobs in which, on a good day, you spend all day looking at blue porn. Niiiiice.

0
Reply
Female 1,395
Ok, i`m never travelling by plane again (at least, not from that airport) and it depends who`s doing the pat down; i think we should be presented with a line up to choose who we`d like to pat us down, one with a Ryan Gosling look-a-like option preferably. O and i`d like my pat down from behind o.O thanks.
0
Reply
Male 1,002
I just like the fact that they did this specifically to be LESS intrusive.
0
Reply
Male 24
I`m packin` a 12-inch dildo if I have to through.
0
Reply
Male 690
Aw lame we see the fat guy and not the hot roosterney chick? And this is sexy? Mayhap you liked his little package?
0
Reply
Male 2,593
I`d like to pat her down
0
Reply
Male 2,034
I`d like to see her in that machine.
0
Reply
Male 1,929
Must be stressed that this is OPTIONAL. Traditional security is still there for people who feel uncomfortable.

Personally I will be using this the next time I go on holiday.

0
Reply
Male 307
"Thank you for your co-operation sir, just step right though. You might want to get that thing on your nards looked at BTW. Also, your camera is crap, I had one just like it. Have a nice day. Enjoy your scrambled credit cards. NEXT!"
0
Reply
Female 1,593
Less intrusive than a physical pat down? Really? Hmm...I dunno you taking naked pictures of me fully clothed. Definitely not intrusive.
0
Reply
Male 350
why don`t you show us yourself, sweetie? ^^
0
Reply
Male 3,147
is it actually more effective than a manual search or just quicker and easier?

if it`s a lot more effective, then i`m for it.... but if it`s just a case of it being more convenient for the airlines so they can squeeze more passengers through then i`d be against it. Life moves fast enough as it is these days...we should be slowing things down not trying to go faster everywhere.

0
Reply
Male 795
Of course they have some chubby dude do it.
0
Reply
Male 2,229
The next step towards "total recall"`s walk thru scanner. To evade this devise is really quite simple really, surgery, if one want to go "suicidal" and evade detection. Instead of carrying a `weapon` on the outside the body, carry it on the inside. This would also foil a `pat down` as well.
My apologies if this ups ones paranoia level, but if it any consultation, one would have to totally drated up and have a large cash reserve to pull this one way ticket off.
0
Reply
Male 2,551
So...are there any jobs going at Manchester Airport then? :D
0
Reply
Male 216
i agree subushie. Id rather be patted down than be seen naked. Last thing I need is a horny Security Guard looking at my wife. Or worse. my daughter.
0
Reply
Male 639
>how in the hell is this less intrusive? im ok with the pat down thank you, i dont want airport security men rating the size of my dick. or my girlfriends breasts.<

Someone`s a little insecure and overprotective.

0
Reply
Male 7
Imagine having some pieces of metal under your shirt that spell out "f*** you" :D
0
Reply
Male 129
I have no problem with this technology...so what if some dude see`s your poo...he`s also going to have to see the poo of every other person that goes through there...and lets be honest...after a while that will get old...sure they`ll get "excited" each time a young teenage girl goes through there, but he will also have to deal with all the obese men, elderly women and men...etc

fact is, people worry about "invasion of Privacy" way too much when it will likely be not warranted. Plus if this technology stops just one plane from being taken over, or one life is saved, I would say that is worth the cost of some person you will never see seeing a blurred image of your junk...

0
Reply
Male 1,646
how in the hell is this less intrusive? im ok with the pat down thank you, i dont want airport security men rating the size of my dick. or my girlfriends breasts.
0
Reply
Male 43
The idea is that the person viewing the xray doesn`t even see you, but that they can alert guards if they see anything wrong.
I`ll use it even if if someone does see my rooster.
0
Reply
Male 176
AAAAaaaargh. Thank you.
How can this really be anything other that an overbearing need to prove innocence when presumed guilty?
0
Reply
Male 3,322
I think that it`s an option that you can take instead of emptying your pockets and being pat down. Personally, I`d take the empty the pockets and get pat down technique myself. I`d take the "hassle" over the invasion.
0
Reply
Male 4,547
I`d so much rather be pat down than have everything on display.
0
Reply
Male 490
Totally against this. I heard about this last year, and it`s a 100% invasion of privacy.

How many criminals are they going to catch with this?
How many innocent civilians will be seen naked?

These things ALWAYS affect the innocent ones more than any criminal.

What was the latest statistic about the patriot act`s methods of national security? Last I saw, they had literally caught NO CRIMINALS trying to hurt someone (in america, of course). On the other hand, thousands of people have been strip searched, forced off of flights, etc... for nothing.
When they "randomly" select a 12 year old girl to search, and then strip search... (wtf, yea, that`s happened a few times)

0
Reply
Male 15
yeah sure put a man as an example!!!
0
Reply
Male 2,440
This is wrong on so many levels.
0
Reply
Male 4,807
Awww that`s just Nuts
0
Reply
Male 5,094
I was hoping she`d get in.
0
Reply
Male 7,611
yeah, no physical pat down, but hell lets see what you look like naked. you could definitely see that guys junk a little.
0
Reply
Male 133
Link: Manchester Airport`s `Naked` Scanners [Video] [Rate Link] - Airport security just got a whole lot sexier.
0
Reply