Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
You get a 59%."
lol geography fail
You get a 59%.
I don`t even care that this is fake. Doesn`t stop it from being hella funny.
Stop bringing facts into it, it totally ruins the argument :-)
his paper actually makes a few good comments about "Oedipus" if you leave out the anal lube and gay sex references
I don`t know either, but I have enough friends that seem to know every disgusting site on the web to know when not to haha You cannot unlearn what you have learned. I apologize.
It`s still funny, even though it doesn`t look real. Oh well.
Hey, what IS tubgirl?? I have no idea either!
(Googles it - finds `urban dictionary` reference)OK, why did I search that? After all this time on IAB, I should have KNOWN not to by now. I just shoula KNOWN aaaaaaaaargh
Oh you sweet innocent child...
Yes, that proves its done by the average College student then!
XD for me you win this post XD
I can`t deduct for it if they already have more than the required minimum of REAL sources.
Tubgirl is an EXCELLENT source.
Failtacular: a fail so epic, it`s almost a win.
Where I come from, showing this as my sources would give me a fail. I refuse to believe that this is legitimate because of the obvious flaws. And, bear this one with me: why in the world, would a teacher, obviously teaching someone in high school seeing that he addressed Mr. Freeman with a title, would display such childish features like the red cross and circle around the citations. To compare to where I come from: when we made a mistake, even if it was a major mistake, -x would be stated in the margin (x = subtracted points) or even stated in an erratum.
This just doesn`t make sense whatsoever.
I could be wrong, but it`s what makes sense to me.
Not as funny as someone commenting on grammar and using `more funny`, as well as not knowing the proper use of `to` and `too`.
He used the right "to".....O_O
????? I`m pretty sure he used "to" the right way....?
and yes it is HILARIOUS