Senate Bill Gives Obama Emergency Internet Control

Submitted by: Chaz1337 8 years ago in
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Realistic scenario: One minute, you"re playing a ball related game on I-Am-Bored, the next minute Barry pulls the plug.
There are 137 comments:
Male 10
test
0
Reply
Male 1,399
Yes, Beatleaddict.

Sucks to public education, indeed.

0
Reply
Female 226
Yeah you know what?

Sucks to public education. The fact we have to pay for other people`s stupid kids to learn things they don`t even care about is horrible and should be abolished.

To hell with the oppressive federal postal system. Controlling our mail just makes them one step closer to controlling what we say.

Down with the military! The socialist government is just trying to have a federal military so it can bring in the gun squads once we question them.

Stop unemployment and welfare! If people don`t have a job and can`t afford things, it`s because they`re a failure and deserve death by poverty and slow starvation.

Just say no to universal health care! Yeah, insurance companies deny vital care for profit but it doesn`t matter because only the rich deserve to live.

For the less perceptive: this is satire. I can`t believe that people are so selfish as to accept the death of others for less taxes, crying socialism against a system that wouldn`t even abolish private provid

0
Reply
Male 3,755
Well, to be fair, madest only paid $8.00 to fix his arm because he had already paid for it out of deductions from his paycheck. Plus, he also helped to pay for the person receiving millions of dollars of cancer treatment.
0
Reply
Male 1,399
Of course I don`t mean you should have forced them. Get with the program, madest!

I mean that you paid eight bucks to fix a non-life-threatening problem, and you believe that it`s right. That other people should pick up the tab for your broken arm, or your sniffles, or rash, or friggin` cough syrup...

But whatever, I`m just a hater. Rah rah Obamacare, whatever.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
Yes. Stand up for theft.

You paid $8.00 for a broken arm. Do you think that`s right? That you should only pay $8.00 to FIX YOUR FUC.KING ARM? I can`t buy a decent meal for $8.00.

You are the product of luxury. A parasite. You require a fat and happy host (after all, you can`t get blood from poor countries, right?) for you to even exist.

Your entire philosophy is a luxury, built on the strong economy that you now take for granted. Like the wealth fell from the sky.

I say again, you are pathetic.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
Socialist is the economic system. Communism is the form of government.

Good lord. You really are pathetic. Go read a book or something.

I certainly think Germany and France are more Socialist than we are, yes. Do you aspire to their system? I don`t.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
Oh, almost forgot your next failure:

Cuba.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
"Only the ones Hugo wants."

You are a complete fool, aren`t you? So it`s a benevolent dictatorship, right? How many terms do you think Hugo will want?

Again, Socialism doesn`t happen all at once. It`s a slow acting poison, but sure.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
Venezuela.
0
Reply
Male 2,372
Thank-you, SuperSmash.

I can`t believe all the idiots that simply refuse to consider a news item that has been reported in several news outlets, just because it`s cool to say "It`s from Fox, and yer not supposed to like Fox, so, er, it must be crap"

0
Reply
Male 1,399
I always want to ask the Obama apologists:

Do you think Socialism happens all at once? Like one day you`re pure laissez-faire Capitalist, then BAM! Instant Socialism?

You do realize that the health care bills being bandied about are a move in the direction of Socialism, yes?

0
Reply
Male 147
Anyone who calls Obama a communist, a Marxist or a Socialist needs to go read the Communist Manifesto before opening their mouth.
0
Reply
Male 160
i voted for a democrat not a communist
0
Reply
Male 474
"There really should be a 1-post-per-forum rule, or something like it."

If you meant in jest then haha. If not, then sorry to have "Wasted" your time...

0
Reply
Male 160
the strength of government is inversely proportional to the strength of the economy and quality of life.

This is why we saw the solv. union fall and why china is growing now that they have a more free market.

STAY OUT OF MY LIFE AND CHECKBOOK OBAMA!

bush sucked like hell and obama has already spent more of my money than bush did in his 8 years

i want my vote back -_-

0
Reply
Male 169
How exactly would you go about turning off the entire internet? This leads me to believe that somewhere there is a HUGE `Mother` modem that supplies all internet and Obama could simply unplug it and the internet would shut down... NAAAAHH!

Off Note: Dear America, There is nothing wrong with the NHS! I live in England and the NHS is fine, and it would probably work better in the US because you have more funds! Leave the NHS alone!

0
Reply
Male 820
*libertarian chiming in*
get the government out of personal choices and all that poo. that is all.
0
Reply
Male 144
@itsallfake
There really should be a 1-post-per-forum rule, or something like it. :o
0
Reply
Male 3,755
My link a little bit down is to the Bill as introduced to the Senate.

This was reported in the same way by more than one source. Namely, CNET and they are owned by CBS.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
...and for the record I`m sure we really care about your health plan.

Meanwhile, do you have a link to the new bill?

0
Reply
Male 474
And for the record i DO have a better solution to health care than Barry OR the right wing retards...
0
Reply
Male 474
And lets be honest about something, the ONLY reason Fox is reporting it is because some other news source disagrees with Barry. If i was a reporter for the NY Times and actually said something to disagree with Barry, like say, his solution for health care reform. And i offered up a totally new solution that goes against what barry has in mind, then Fox news would ACTUALLY report it AND make a point that "Even the NY Times, the most liberal newspaper in the world, agrees that Obama`s health care ideas are bad." While what they are reporting technically accurate information, they are only doing so because it paints certain people and issues in a bad light. Same goes for MSNBC. If McCain had been elected and this bill came up, it would be MSNBC screaming PANIC with Fox trying to hush it up.
0
Reply
Male 474
vague was the term used by the person who didnt want any legislation regarding the internet. That person may very well have understood what the new bill means, but when being interviewed, in order to convey their POV, they say it is "vague". I`m not saying i agree with any legislation but the sheep here have been fed and corralled into one particular point of view, and that is the point of view of the people opposing the bill. All of those reports quote the same person from the same interview. The reporters for fox and cbs, just rewrote the report from CNET with their own language. The interviewee is still the same, the interviewee`s POV is still the same and that POV is Internet legislation is BAD. Add in that the pres can call a state of emergency for US networks and that person who wants the internet free from law and you get a freaked out interview.
0
Reply
Male 1,399
"Vague," in legislation, means "whatever we want it to be and can justify."

So, no, not helping.

0
Reply
Male 474
You didn`t read the article too much i take it? The ORIGINAL bill gave him the power of a kill switch. The bill has since been rewritten and the powers less "troubling" but more "vague" as to what his powers really are. The links in the stories provided are to the original bill. There is no link to the updated bill. But nevermind that CONTINUE PANICKING!!!
0
Reply
Male 1,399
Ha ha...the Lib misinformation squad is out in force:

"Fox News means it`s not true. Forget the other outlet that broke the story, because it appeared in any way, shape or form on Fox (and is critical of Obama) it is NOT TRUE."

0
Reply
Male 928
This is nothing more than misinformation.
0
Reply
Male 3,755
There, now you can`t just say, "Oh, it`s Fox News. Must be fake."

0
Reply
Male 3,755
Female 192
Faux News. Faux News.
0
Reply
Male 3,755
With this bill, the President or his designee (a.k.a. Cybersecurity Czar) can shut down any "United States critical infrastructure information system or network" (a.k.a. ISP)designated by the President as critical, including those in the private sector.

I read the bill. Half of it describes a scholarship program to encourage more students to get advanced computer security degrees and it also lays out the rules for a contest of some kind (kind of skimmed that part).

0
Reply
Male 564
"So the president of AMERICA has the power to switch off" a WORLDWIDE network of computers?"

Well that makes perfect sense if you think about it.

.......

Nevermind.

0
Reply
Female 99
Oh no...IAB made one too many cracks about Obama...time to shut her down.
0
Reply
Male 1,882
I`m having a hard time believing what would even be a good scenario to flip the "kill switch" and cut off internet traffic from X network. I would imagine that by time the US found out about malicious traffic being sent from a network, it would already be too late to stop it. This includes brief DoS/DDoS attacks, hacking, sending confidential information to foreign countries, worms, etc.

What people fear is that good ol` Barry will shut down Faux News and conservative bloggers to crush dissent and get "communist" bills passed. In reality, if he tried such methods, it would likely end in failure of those bills and his impeachment. Hurr.

0
Reply
Male 1,623
"Typical Liberal. Willing to sell out his countrymen for a page in the history books and a bowl of hot soup. Willing to take and leave the constitution depending on whether or not it forwards the social engineering goals of the day. A few years ago it was all "Right to privacy! Bush cant listen to terrorists plan attacks on innocent civilians". But anything for chairman Barry. Idiot. 300 years of blood and sweat is being flushed down the crapper by a handful of tyrants and fools. That goes for both parties"

Nationalist.

0
Reply
Male 55
He doesn`t shut off everyone in the worlds, just the American internet providers.
0
Reply
Male 287
So the president of AMERICA has the power to "switch off" a WORLDWIDE network of computers?
0
Reply
Male 422
What exactly would a "cyber-emergency" be?
Oh noes....google just overturned on teh interweb highway
0
Reply
Male 674
Um the president can "turn off" the internet. right... what kind of idiot would believe that you can just "turn off" a network with billions of computers being accessed by almost 1.8 billion people in every nation on Earth? oh wait, it is fox news... I guess they can convince plenty of their audience. And seeing as over $20 Trillion is made off the internet per year ($54.8 Billion/day; $2.3Bil an hour) You will have millions, if not hundreds of millions of people Demanding by threat of revolt, access to the net. And almost as many people hacking whatever "off switch" is in place.
0
Reply
Male 976
PLEASE destroy the Internetz Obama!! It`s causes nothing but evil...although, if you keep the free, non-virus porn sites, then that`ll be OK. ;)
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Heehee. "This is what the democrats(communists) do".

Your rights and basic needs should be taken care of by the government. This is not communism.

I think the real reason people talk about Big Brother and enroaching big government is they want it to be the case. We live in boring times, with boring office jobs, where we can see the scope of the world and how little we mean to it.

You don`t want to be a nobody, you want to be a big hero, saving the world from some tyrannical despot armed only with a blog and an IAB account. It`s no different from the nut telling everyone he is Napoleon.

Additionally, you are missing 2 extremely important pieces of information.

Additionally still: Have you considered that if you think all sources of information but your hand picked few are left leaning, maybe that`s because reality is?

Luckily, you can now rewrite reality to you own whims: http://www.c

Male 313
If you have no faith in Fox, then you must have no faith in MSNBC or CNN the stations are polar opposites of Fox.

*Unless you just blindly believe that all stations that support Dems are believable and those that don`t support Dems are not?

If so... enjoy the KoolAid and chant Jim Jones over and over.

0
Reply
Male 557
Of course Fox News posted it
hahaha
0
Reply
Male 3,755
That sounds kind of painful, Lion.

I wish I had some minions. Where do you get them?

0
Reply
Male 731
I have more faith in Atom.com than I do in Fox.
0
Reply
Male 313
Don`t question this, just drink the Dem Koolaid and comply.

Anyone that thinks the President should have this power is indeed following with their eyes closed.

Just like the 60`s this has become about winning instead of what`s right or wrong. Even if you are a winning Dem, would you like a Repub to have the power to shut the internet down?

0
Reply
Male 8,302
You idiot SuperSmashed, of course I knew Obama isn`t the Antichrist. My evil minions of death, frothing at the bit yearning to be released to tear the souls of the living and bring eternal darkness to the face of the earth, tattooed that message on my arm in blood, right under the `666`.
0
Reply
Male 3,755
Lion, please tell me you didn`t need Snopes to tell you Obama wasn`t the Antichrist.

That was a joke, right?

0
Reply
Male 8,302
> Animecha
> there is no Antichrist in the Bible

The Antichrist is mentioned 5 times in 1 & 2 John. "Wallah" is spelled "voila" (its French, and is used to call attention to or express satisfaction with a thing shown or accomplished).

Snopes.com has an article about this Obama is the Antichrist thing; quite frankly, IMHO, Snopes has never let me down for the cold, hard, researched facts on anything, so if they say its BS, then I call it BS too.

And this whole Antichrist thing is stupidly off-topic anyway, the main reason the government wants control over the internet is for when Obama is watching live streaming porn and its getting too slow buffering.

0
Reply
Male 524
well, i think that most people agree that this bill shouldn`t be allowed to pass.
0
Reply
Male 3,755
Fox News just reported that the sun will rise tomorrow.

I guess we`re all screwed then.

0
Reply
Female 15,763
"Apparently you`ve never heard of MSNBC then. Fox can`t come anywhere near being as biased as MSNBC is...."

Hey now, MSNBC has some very good programming. I for one enjoy their shows on prison life for struggling teens, or their shows on homelessness life for struggling teens, or their shows on struggling teens for struggling teens...

It beats the other 4 channels I have: TV guide, public access, BET, and Singles for Jesus.

0
Reply
Male 10,440
How did the antichrist come up out of this? I laugh at you people. I really REALLY do.
0
Reply
Male 10,440
Whoa. Thats not good. But its from FOX and is almost certainly overblown. But still... dang. Talk about heading down a darker road from an already dark road...
0
Reply
Male 147
blackjack, there is no Antichrist in the Bible but antichrists aka. anti-Christians. Basically, people who didn`t know how to read took the vague figurative description of a beast and equated it with what the Bible calls antichrists. Then wallah, the idea of the Antichrist was born to scare good Christians into fearing whatever people wanted to call the Antichrist at the time.
0
Reply
Male 26
Controlling the media is a sign of the antichrist, I don`t personally believe obama is the antichrist but I do believe he is possible leading up to it.
0
Reply
Male 3,755
Scootdive, I took your advice and looked at the bill.

The phrase "United States critical infrastructure information system or network" refers to any information system or network designated by the President as critical, including those in the private sector.

0
Reply
Male 486
WHY THE EFF IS THERE A POST FROM FOX NEWS?!
0
Reply
Male 3,755
bigbaddave, you are completely right. I forgot about MSNBC.
0
Reply
Male 734
Even if he had the power, Obama wouldn`t take down the internet unless there was an absolute necessity- and even then, temporarily. The internet is pretty much his best friend. He of all people knows that the internet makes or breaks him.

Besides, it`d be like killing lolcats. He wouldn`t kill lolcats, would he? :`(

Besides,

0
Reply
Male 1
Ugh........ People need to stop listening to propaganda (from either side) and make up their own f-ing minds. Read the bill: "(2) may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network"
Meaning he CANT shut down I-A-B.com but he can shut down traffic to the FBI`s secure servers if necessary. Seems logical to me.......
0
Reply
Male 395
It`s from Fox news. So stop worrying. It`s bullpoo!
0
Reply
Male 265
madest the only reason this will not happen is because fox (and probably conservative talk radio) has decided to report on it and people will question it. (and for the record i watch both fox and msnbc, i mean chris matthews is the funniest guy on television, and at 1 in the morning olberman is the only thing on) and i can tell u if this was left to the hands of msnbc, cnn, ny times, ect... this would become law because they do not seriously question obama. (they may bring it up now that fox has)

also to all you "its fox news i wont read this" fox is a reputable news organization as is nbc or the others. the difference is nbc is focusing on attacking the bush administration or blowing smoke up teddys butt all day long, while some are actually focusing on the person who has power. and not listening to "the other side" is one of the most closed minded things you can do.

finally i was disappointed with the way the right allowed warrantless wiretaps, it made me so s

0
Reply
Male 214
The only thing in the world more biased than Fox News is madest.
**********************
Apparently you`ve never heard of MSNBC then. Fox can`t come anywhere near being as biased as MSNBC is.... or for that matter, NBC in general. NBC as a whole is so far to the left that they sell Obama merchandise at their store in NYC.
0
Reply
Male 1,254
This is not the HOPE you are looking for. Personally, I`m voting Robot Nixon in 2012. Striking fear into enemies, allies, and countrymen can be a good thing!


0
Reply
Male 3,755
Obama can`t shut down the internet, but he can shut down the internet providers.

You think AT&T and Comcast want to anger the government?

This would leave the vast majority of the United States without internet access. Some can figure their way around it, but most cannot.

0
Reply
Male 462
Oh, it`s FOX. (closes link)
0
Reply
Male 3,755
The only thing in the world more biased than Fox News is madest.
0
Reply
Male 265
warrantless wiretaps were not a good idea and neither is this. i questioned those wiretaps, which obama still does, and i question this. while yes obama does not have a plug in the oval office which he can pull that also means once it is pulled it cannot be simply plugged back in. this leads to not just 10 minutes of downed internet but rather hours, days or even weeks. and the cause of the loss would probably never be revealed to the public with the excuse of national security. so the best course of action is to not trust, key word is trust, him with such a power.
0
Reply
Male 63
Typical dumb republican who thinks that there`s one central plug for Obama to pull. I`m no tech genius but from what I understand it just don`t work that way. <- attempting to speak hick
----------------------------------------------
Typical elitist liberal thinking that anyone not in the North East MUST be a rube.
0
Reply
Male 13,630
primetimekin
Male, 13-17, Southern US
7709 Posts Saturday, August 29, 2009 4:27:15 PM
"ok guys wait, its fox news...i am now passing out grains of salt for all you"

I guess Ted Kennedy didn`t die either. It was on Fox.

CNET must be BS`ing too right?
-------------------------------------------------
Hell no he isnt dead, Micheal Jackson needed a goverment chap to sort his will out

0
Reply
Male 63
Typical Republican. Too chicken-poo to do anything other than leave a threatening message on IAB`s comments. Dimwit can`t even spell properly. I`m ashamed you live in my country.
----------------------------------------------
Typical Liberal. Willing to sell out his countrymen for a page in the history books and a bowl of hot soup. Willing to take and leave the constitution depending on whether or not it forwards the social engineering goals of the day. A few years ago it was all "Right to privacy! Bush cant listen to terrorists plan attacks on innocent civilians". But anything for chairman Barry. Idiot. 300 years of blood and sweat is being flushed down the crapper by a handful of tyrants and fools. That goes for both parties
0
Reply
Male 758
And quit being a troll, madest. I`m ashamed you live on my internet.
0
Reply
Male 758
Isn`t this one of the anti-christ predictions? Controlling the media?
Personally, I don`t put any stock in crap like that.
However, giving control over something like this is going a touch too far...what kind of emergency could there ever be?
I`d be pissed if some turd get the interwebs shut off during my game of Starcraft...
It`ll be like that episode of South Park.
0
Reply
Male 26
I agree with a lot of the things that Obama stands for, somewhat, but this bill really is something that I don`t really agree with. If we give the president that much control over something such as the Internet, then when is there going to be a line? This really is too much power for one man in my opinion. Despite any emergency this could really hinder literally all of american at one moment. I don`t see anything good coming from this at all.
0
Reply
Male 63
The Obama can do no harm. Embrace the Obama and be at peas with all and teh interwebs.
0
Reply
Female 876
Foxnews is the reason that people wig out. Turn everything into a big deal.

There`s no way this would ever pass.

0
Reply
Male 37
oh gosh...this WONT end up good...next time the elections happen, hes gonna use this, for himself. Personally..i think hes leaving our backs open
0
Reply
Male 4,793
"I may not know the U.S. Government like the back of my hand but isn`t that considered unconstitutional?"

lol, he still thinks the constitution matters.

0
Reply
Male 4,793
any senator that votes for this bill should uhh...`dissapear` if you know what i mean.
0
Reply
Male 9,305
Opie: Oh yeah...I forgot about that...
0
Reply
Female 986
We`re safe north of the 49th right? ...right?
0
Reply
Female 15,763
"The internet is a wild open field, you can build your fences, you can build your walls, but no one owns it or can have complete control over it. It is no one`s. It is everyone`s.

It is free. Leave it be."

Someone want to tell China this?

0
Reply
Male 7,933
"ok guys wait, its fox news...i am now passing out grains of salt for all you"

I guess Ted Kennedy didn`t die either. It was on Fox.

CNET must be BS`ing too right?

0
Reply
Male 1,815
Canada is still living without fear of losing our porn
0
Reply
Male 670
ok guys wait, its fox news...i am now passing out grains of salt for all you
0
Reply
Male 21
I may not know the U.S. Government like the back of my hand but isn`t that considered unconstitutional?
0
Reply
Male 1,623
"This is what the democrats (communists) do. They want complete control of your lives and your money. They tell you what to do and how to live. Why do you think in the past we have been so set against communism in other countries? Government control is a really bad thing."

You fought communism to keep your de facto colonies secure. The socialist nations failed because they were bound to fail from the beginning (no stability, no industry, no education etc. You should be amazed what they managed to accomplish with a government controlled economy) and faced extreme opposition.
The industrial nations already had the capital (and using it to control and exploit other nations) and tried to pin poverty on the communists to avoid the world turning against them.

Sure Stalin was drated up, but would it make any difference if it was a capitalist regime (fascism)?

Capitalism does not equal freedom and democracy, rather the opposite in the end.

0
Reply
Female 178
"The internet is a wild open field, you can build your fences, you can build your walls, but no one owns it or can have complete control over it. It is no one`s. It is everyone`s.

It is free. Leave it be."

I see a historical parallel!

"The Earth is a wild open field, you can build your fences, you can build your walls, but no one owns it or can have complete control over it. It is no one`s. It is everyone`s.

It is free. Leave it be."

0
Reply
Male 2,372
Thank you, Cajun247!!

This stupid knee-jerk reaction on anything that comes from Fox News is a little immature. Fox is reporting that Ted Kennedy died. Are we supposed to be dismissive of these facts because it comes from Fox News?

Check out other sources, and you`ll see that other organizations, including privacy advocates and IT publications are freaked out by the bill as well.

...as they should be!

0
Reply
Male 118
Man, first the military commissions act of 2006, now this. America is slowly turning more and more communist. Glad I live in Canada.
0
Reply
Male 12,365
"The internet is a wild open field, you can build your fences, you can build your walls, but no one owns it or can have complete control over it. It is no one`s. It is everyone`s.

It is free. Leave it be."

That sounds good, but in practice you are in wrong.

Firstly, it costs money. That means someone will have to pay for it. There might be some people willing and able to fund small parts of it for altruistic reasons, but in general it`s a business. Businesses tend to obey orders from the authorities.

Secondly, you hire net access through a business (your ISP). See above.

Thirdly, the web is a lot more fragile than the net itself due to the requirement for root domain name servers. If you shut down those servers in the USA, it would have a huge effect.

It`s not as simple as an off switch, but the authorities in the USA could cut nearly everyone in the USA off from the net.

0
Reply
Male 3,058
If Obama turns it off, can`t we just plug in new tubes?
0
Reply
Male 20,829
mikhaillost, i`ll light the fuse.
0
Reply
Male 3,425
Man, can`t you ever be happy. You vote for some guy calling him the best in the world, then a few months later he`s a communist who`s ruining the country. It`s like with George Bush, you were always saying he was ruining the country, but you continued to vote for him. Here`s an idea, why don`t you be president, and we`ll count how quickly you screw things up.
0
Reply
Female 538
I will blow something up before my internet is controlled by the government.
0
Reply
Male 7,933
"Hear hear Slugs! We need to lean towards a smaller government!! It`s getting a little too 1984 in here"

But Big Brother likes that book...

0
Reply
Male 9,305
The internet is a wild open field, you can build your fences, you can build your walls, but no one owns it or can have complete control over it. It is no one`s. It is everyone`s.

It is free. Leave it be.

0
Reply
Female 434
Hear hear Slugs! We need to lean towards a smaller government!! It`s getting a little too 1984 in here
0
Reply
Male 2,440
"maybe if Oberman didn`t jizz whenever Obama spoke..."

xD I lol`d, prime.

& to all who think it`s just the democrats pulling this "government crapping all over your rights & taking your money" nonsense, the republicans often do the same.

0
Reply
Male 357
This is what the democrats (communists) do. They want complete control of your lives and your money. They tell you what to do and how to live. Why do you think in the past we have been so set against communism in other countries? Government control is a really bad thing.
0
Reply
Male 3,425
Well said fancy. I have no idea if what you said was right since I know nothing about American politics, but whatever you said sort of made sense.
0
Reply
Male 10,855
Hah of course Fox, where else?

Okay actually I do see other websites referring to this bill. I hope it does not become law.

0
Reply
Male 650
Female 15,763
"You can bet your sweet ass CNN and MSNBC would be all over this poo if a republican pulled this crap."

Nope. MSNBC is still doing their Remember Ted Kennedy special, they wouldn`t have time.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
Try finding this on any other outlet but Fox News:

Maxine Waters wants to socialize the oil companies

So....was a Congresswoman threatening nationalization of oil newsworthy? Yes. Was Fox the only news organization on the scene? No. Why didn`t any other outlet show it? They`re heavily biased.

0
Reply
Male 4,546
Bael: I`ll stick by what I say, we aren`t done yet. ;)
0
Reply
Male 20,829
If I could have found an alternative link to this story in the few minutes I had to approve it, I would have. Yes, Fox News isn`t very "even and balanced" but the facts are there, with their angle.

Every news outlet has their own angles and agendas. Some are pro-Barry, some are anti-Barry, but they still report on current affairs.

The facts are, there`s a bill on the block that will give the president the power to literally shut down the internet.

Is it possible that all the ball-licking pro-Obama news outlets aren`t going all out on this story because it`s their guy?

You can bet your sweet ass CNN and MSNBC would be all over this poo if a republican pulled this crap.

0
Reply
Male 7,933
kairo, maybe if Oberman didn`t jizz whenever Obama spoke...
0
Reply
Male 1,623
"I love all you morons that think that because Fox reported it, it must be wrong. Well hello, perhaps you aren`t looking at the MASSIVE bias from MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, or all the major newspapers who are so left-leaning they practically have copies of the Communist Manifesto as mandatory reading for all new employees. Give me a break."

God damn redneck thinking everything less conservative than feudalism is left-wing.

0
Reply
Male 1,399
And damn if you weren`t wrong BOTH TIMES, Baal!

You are like...the Nostradamus of IAB. Remarkable.

CNet broke this story, not Fox News.

0
Reply
Male 734
I love all you morons that think that because Fox reported it, it must be wrong. Well hello, perhaps you aren`t looking at the MASSIVE bias from MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, or all the major newspapers who are so left-leaning they practically have copies of the Communist Manifesto as mandatory reading for all new employees. Give me a break.
0
Reply
Female 387
All governments are like this. Was the same over here when Tony Blair got elected. When will we ever learn?

The lesson: Nobody is perfect. People always have their own agendas, and putting them in power causes these things to happen.

0
Reply
Female 15,763
Were news stations always like this, or is this horrible bias that everyone has a relatively new thing?
0
Reply
Male 7,933
0
Reply
Male 3,425
Y2K anybody?
0
Reply
Male 3,255
@Baalthazaq

Yea, that`s pretty much how I remember it, lol.

I was all ready to declare him the messiah with everyone else back before the election, mainly because of his speech where he said: "Whatever we once were we are no longer a Christian nation, we are an EVERYBODY nation."

Now, however, the whole "but big government is bad!" argument against Obama seems to be making more and more sense every day. :(

0
Reply
Female 434
I also agree that you have to take Fox news with a grain of salt, but the other news stations are so "I wanna suck Obama`s pee pee" that it becomes sickening.
0
Reply
Male 3,310
Yeah, I would really like to see how he plans on cutting things off. That would be a complete technical nightmare. lol, good luck
0
Reply
Male 3,755
I sure you hope there are a couple of people here with the ability to read through the bias to just get the facts.

Fox News provides factual information, they just give their own little twist to it. So, don`t completely disregard the impact of this bill solely based on the source.

It seems like some people wouldn`t believe a hurricane was coming if Fox News reported it. The wind may be blowing at 100 m.p.h., but it can`t be true- it was on Fox News.

P.S. I dislike all cable news, but am not blinded by bias against any one station.

0
Reply
Male 13,630
Baalthazaq - From a Blighty chap - Nice one!
0
Reply
Female 434
Actually I wrote in Ron Paul
0
Reply
Male 4,546
Polish: You clearly weren`t here before the elections.

Two Months Prior to Election:
IAB: OMG I would totally put Obamas pee pee in my mouth, for he is awesome.
Baal: Obama is a regular dude who will adequately address the needs of the US in trying times.
IAB: Screw you ballzag, he is the messiah and he hath cometh.

Two Months After:
IAB: OMG he totally wants to make America touch his communist islamiofascist pee pee!
Baal: Obama is a regular dude, who adequately addresses the needs of America.
IAB: Screw you baalzag, he is the Antichrist and he hath cometh.

0
Reply
Male 251
@StphnHrrll

...But you voted for him.

0
Reply
Male 74
Wait.

A one-sided anti-Obama argument from Fox News, being posted on I-Am-Bored.

Whatever next.

0
Reply
Male 907
I suppose that works for cnet too?

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-103200...

0
Reply
Male 403
Yay! Just what this country needs! The freedom of speech and to do what they want taken away!
0
Reply
Female 434
Eff Obama! and Eff all you fools who voted for him
0
Reply
Male 438
well its from fawks news so...
0
Reply
Male 2,313
Are you drating kidding me?
0
Reply
Male 9
I`m not that worried. It will take forever to plug up all those tubes.
0
Reply
Male 907
The internet is slowly being killed. If this bill passes, I smell /b/.
0
Reply
Female 1,260
Oh, yeah, this is a good idea. Let`s all get a petition together to get this passed right away. With IAB`s strength of numbers we can pull it off...cough, choke, sarcasm, sarcasm.....
I`m going to move to a communist country so that I have rights. (Uh...more sarcasm, for those who take things too literally)
0
Reply
Male 626
Because the internet is the pinnacle of free speech, thus the pinnacle of opposing views.
0
Reply
Male 66
They`re giving him power to turn off T3H 1NT3RN3T5? Why not giv ehim the power to turn off phones, and the mail service, and UPS, and FEDEX, hell, why not give him the power to glue our mouths shut.
0
Reply
Male 58
Link: Senate Bill Gives Obama Emergency Internet Control [Rate Link] - Realistic scenario: One minute, you`re playing a ball related game on I-Am-Bored, the next minute Barry pulls the plug.
0
Reply