Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 65    Average: 3.8/5]
185 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 27579
Rating: 3.8
Category:
Date: 06/01/09 06:12 PM

185 Responses to Handy Saggy Pants Chart [Pic]

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18502 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 11:57 am
    Link: Handy Saggy Pants Chart - This chart was recently published in the Detroit Free Press newspaper. Good information for you baggy pants wearers.
  2. Profile photo of Jasonbobdude
    Jasonbobdude Male 18-29
    1598 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:21 pm
    I`d say that anyone who has their pants hanging down below their butt has problems. I don`t get why they think it looks cool.
  3. Profile photo of miakauisan
    miakauisan Female 18-29
    158 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:22 pm
    AWSOME!
  4. Profile photo of The_Garuness
    The_Garuness Male 18-29
    931 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:22 pm
    LMAO
    so much fail
  5. Profile photo of DrRitchie
    DrRitchie Male 18-29
    94 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:23 pm
    i heard they made this a crime in a lot of cities. makes sense to me.
  6. Profile photo of Muncherific1
    Muncherific1 Female 30-39
    65 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:23 pm
    Ok, can we make this a world-wide thing? LOVE IT!
  7. Profile photo of edana42
    edana42 Female 50-59
    2509 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:25 pm
    This should be a law in every state!
  8. Profile photo of bluethen
    bluethen Male 13-17
    617 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:25 pm
    Recently? This is pretty old, actually.
  9. Profile photo of Norris
    Norris Male 18-29
    1011 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:27 pm
    @Jasonbob, the reason they think its cool, is because the saggy pants thing came from prison. They would just give you clothes to wear, sometimes way too big.

    Sadly a large portion who look up to prison thugs will be there with them soon enough. :P

  10. Profile photo of CoeshCoesh
    CoeshCoesh Male 13-17
    131 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:29 pm
    Holy poo.
  11. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7936 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:30 pm
    ok, I`m at the warning level, I`m fine
  12. Profile photo of Sillii
    Sillii Female 13-17
    332 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:31 pm
    Does anyone see anything wrong with this:
    For a long time now, a lot of women have been showing their thongs and cracks, but no one really put a LAW against it.
    Is it so bad for men to do it?
    I may not be the biggest fan of baggy pants, but come on. A law? I`m sure this falls under freedom of speech.
  13. Profile photo of shaboinkin
    shaboinkin Male 18-29
    456 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:34 pm
    So they gonna pay their tax dollars on putting someone in jail for sagging their pants? Really? a year in jail? It ain`t cheap to be putting people in jail in the first place
  14. Profile photo of Canine
    Canine Male 13-17
    142 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:35 pm
    good game white man, good to see you`re still runnin the world
  15. Profile photo of Spirithound
    Spirithound Male 18-29
    815 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:37 pm
    lmao.....*wedgies primetimekin*
  16. Profile photo of Ailyn_Vel
    Ailyn_Vel Female 18-29
    116 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:37 pm
    Holy balls...that`s a bit steep.
  17. Profile photo of Hiromi
    Hiromi Female 18-29
    1149 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:43 pm
    Thank god there`s a place that takes that seriously!
  18. Profile photo of bulbasaur
    bulbasaur Female 18-29
    168 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:45 pm
    Finally! NOBODY WANTS TO LOOK AT YOUR BOXERS IN PUBLIC.
    Sillii - I think this should apply to thongs sticking out too.
    Keep your @ss where it belongs: in yout pants.
  19. Profile photo of MikeW
    MikeW Male 30-39
    137 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:46 pm
    Nobody cries about fascism when the law is reinforcing their own opinion.
  20. Profile photo of edana42
    edana42 Female 50-59
    2509 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:47 pm
    wait wait wait omg omg omg the "fashion statement" started in prisons because sometimes the uniforms were too big. sooo, society is gonna put them in a place where they will fit in! lol rofl lmao
  21. Profile photo of outfire
    outfire Male 13-17
    524 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:49 pm
    don`t see why anyone thinks this is cool, i wouldn`t have had a law against it if it were my decision, but i don`t really care either way.
  22. Profile photo of IslandLotus
    IslandLotus Female 18-29
    410 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:49 pm
    "I may not be the biggest fan of baggy pants, but come on. A law? I`m sure this falls under freedom of speech."

    Not unless your crack talks.

    But yea, I`ve seen many women do much worse. In fact, I know from experience, with the low rise jeans you have to be careful when squatting or bending over. The alternative is mom jeans, and I just can`t fathom that.

  23. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7936 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:51 pm
    "Finally! NOBODY WANTS TO LOOK AT YOUR BOXERS IN PUBLIC.
    Sillii - I think this should apply to thongs sticking out too.
    Keep your @ss where it belongs: in yout pants."

    In the words of todays modern philosopher, lil wayne, "It Ain`t Trickin if you got it", and my guess of your hatred for thongs would be "you ain`t got poo".

    "lmao.....*wedgies primetimekin*"

    *winces*

    "Nobody cries about fascism when the law is reinforcing their own opinion."

    Is it QFT what the kids say today? Then yeah QFT

  24. Profile photo of edana42
    edana42 Female 50-59
    2509 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:53 pm
    trust me, with my butt, and many many others, give me mom jeans...with a belt
  25. Profile photo of lillypadam
    lillypadam Female 13-17
    66 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:55 pm
    i hate it when guys wear their pants like that..
  26. Profile photo of Standards
    Standards Male 18-29
    564 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 12:59 pm
    "Is it QFT what the kids say today? Then yeah QFT"

    What does QFT mean?

  27. Profile photo of dm2754
    dm2754 Male 40-49
    3284 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:02 pm
    Like the song says "the underwear goes inside the pants"
    The same goes for young girls. Hip huggers sexy; underwear hanging out sluty
  28. Profile photo of uunnfair_4ol
    uunnfair_4ol Female 18-29
    147 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:06 pm
    Aaliyah sagged her pants. I think the first example should be called even. It`s all just very weird to me. Weird the law passed, and weird people would want to walk around like that. Except for maybe not having clothes that fit. Ridiculous.
  29. Profile photo of boredallthet
    boredallthet Female 30-39
    5 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:07 pm
    How is this any different from legislating that men can`t have hair past their shoulders? Or that women MUST wear their hair past their shoulders? I live in Michigan, 20 mins. south of Flint...yay for me, eh?
  30. Profile photo of uunnfair_4ol
    uunnfair_4ol Female 18-29
    147 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:07 pm
    Quoted For Truth. I just looked it up.
  31. Profile photo of ScottSerious
    ScottSerious Male 18-29
    5316 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:09 pm
    ha. awesome
  32. Profile photo of HotCarl
    HotCarl Female 18-29
    142 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:14 pm
    Good old America!
  33. Profile photo of ShadowRyder
    ShadowRyder Male 18-29
    2128 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:18 pm
    Finally! It`s about time they made a law against this sh*t.
  34. Profile photo of Slmmhmmr161
    Slmmhmmr161 Male 18-29
    606 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:26 pm
    Boredallthet:
    How is this any different from legislating that men can`t have hair past their shoulders? Or that women MUST wear their hair past their shoulders? I live in Michigan, 20 mins. south of Flint...yay for me, eh?

    Kinda hard to hide an illegal weapon in your hair. Not as easy as hiding it in loose, saggy pants.

  35. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12151 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:29 pm
    Good on you, America.

    Was just reading this: "In absolute terms, the United States currently has the largest inmate population in the world, with more than 2.5 million or more than one in a hundred adults in prison and jails. Although the US represents less than 5% of the world`s population, over 25% of the people incarcerated around the world are housed in the American prison system. As a percentage of total population, the US also has the largest imprisoned population in the world, with 739 people per 100,000 serving time, awaiting trial or otherwise detained."

    About time these heinous criminals with their baggy-pants-wearing felonies got locked up too. Ah, land of the free...

  36. Profile photo of lord_byron
    lord_byron Male 13-17
    307 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:32 pm
    shaboinkin: "So they gonna pay their tax dollars on putting someone in jail for sagging their pants? Really? a year in jail? It ain`t cheap to be putting people in jail in the first place"


    yeah. this is bull. ok yeah, it looks dumb, but a dratin law?

  37. Profile photo of boredallthet
    boredallthet Female 30-39
    5 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:32 pm
    Slmmhmmr:

    I guess I didn`t realize that baggy pants made weapons easier to hide and access, although, it seems to me it`d be easier to hide a weapon in your waistband rather then in your exposed boxer shorts...I dunno, tho, cuz Im not a criminal and don`t carry weapons...neither is or does my fiance whose pants pretty much live within the "warning" level...

  38. Profile photo of DrZoom
    DrZoom Male 30-39
    2 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:33 pm
    This is so useless. Dr. Manhattan rarely wears pants.
  39. Profile photo of boredallthet
    boredallthet Female 30-39
    5 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:34 pm
    Amen, davymid, sad but true...
  40. Profile photo of boredfjord
    boredfjord Male 13-17
    928 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:34 pm
    Assuming this is real, it`s appallingly totalitarian. Legislating one`s own taste in fashion is absurd and unjust, especially when the punishment for deviance from the law is so alarmingly harsh. I`m quite ashamed that so many on here seemed pleased. Apparently oppression is acceptable when it suits your prudish, irrational, conservative notions of what an American citizen`s dress code ought to be.
  41. Profile photo of Slmmhmmr161
    Slmmhmmr161 Male 18-29
    606 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:40 pm
    Boredallthet:

    Saggy pants, believe it or not, (This is true) started out as being a prison trend for relaying the sexual availability of one prisoner to another. As well, some schools enforce certain dress codes to prevent weapons being carried in the waistband of student`s pants.

    boredfjord:

    I hope such laws come into place where I live in Canada. Baring your @$$ in public is considered indecent exposure (or something along those lines)in most developed cultures. Pants are worn at the waist to prevent such occurrences.

  42. Profile photo of Liquidglass
    Liquidglass Male 18-29
    1111 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:42 pm
    Actually the sagging pants thing isn`t just a "fashion" statement. It was started in prisons for men to show their availability to other inmates. You get the idea.

    Out on the streets, it can have gang affiliations, not always but sort of like the red and blue colors, people who are wearing them aren`t always in a gang, but in certain places they are.

  43. Profile photo of robrobrob125
    robrobrob125 Male 13-17
    118 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:46 pm
    That made we lol
  44. Profile photo of Shellie84
    Shellie84 Female 18-29
    4198 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:46 pm
    hooray! now when i walk down the street i dont have to stare at someones plumber crack anymore!

    .. if i lived in america..

  45. Profile photo of belunan
    belunan Male 30-39
    1507 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    "It was started in prisons for men to show their availability to other inmates. You get the idea."

    Maybe if we spent more time publicizing this, this trend would die a little quicker.

  46. Profile photo of boredfjord
    boredfjord Male 13-17
    928 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:53 pm
    Swimsuits are considered socially acceptable in all developed countries. A few inches of boxer, evidently, are not. This is wildly irrational.

    I don`t care where the trend came from; the trend in and of itself is harmless, and that`s what`s relevant. Underwear will not hurt you. I even will go so far as to say that this law is probably implicitly motivated by racism, because I don`t see too many people saying that The Naked Cowboy should be thrown in jail. Do you all realize that these penalties are as harsh as the penalties for a first offense DUI (or OWI) in Michigan? It`s drating obscene.

  47. Profile photo of boredfjord
    boredfjord Male 13-17
    928 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 1:57 pm
    Also, everybody saying this began in prison to indicate sexual receptiveness is full of poo.

    http://www.snopes.com/risque/homosex/sag...

  48. Profile photo of buttersisluv
    buttersisluv Female 18-29
    363 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:00 pm
    Can`t this be a law everywhere?
  49. Profile photo of Slmmhmmr161
    Slmmhmmr161 Male 18-29
    606 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:00 pm
    boredfjord:

    If I go to a beach/a country with a relatively hot climate, I`ll expect to see more skin than I would in other, cooler places. Walking down the street of my hometown (Doesn`t get higher than 30C in the summer, but down to -40C in the winter) it`s not reasonable to expect to see underwear hanging out everywhere.


    Like I`ve said, its quite possible the law is motivated by the fight against illegal weaponry being carried around by every "Gangsta" and wannabe in Detroit. It`s just a coincidence that those who wear their pants like this happen to be minorities.

  50. Profile photo of cuchulainn
    cuchulainn Male 30-39
    138 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:01 pm
    @boredfjord

    A coherent and well presented argument. However, the good people of Flint, MI have chosen not to be required to look at others` underwear, and a law has been created, and the local PD is required to uphold that law.

    A law which requires underwear to be covered by clothing cannot be considered racist, because it requires that people of all races cover their underwear and not just people of a certain race.

  51. Profile photo of shaboinkin
    shaboinkin Male 18-29
    456 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:05 pm
    IF I DON`T LIKE IT, BAN IT!!! RAAAGHHHH
    That`s what yall sound like to me...im just saying
    I`m pretty sure yall got more important things to worry bout then looking at some guy wearing his pants like that. It ain`t hurting anyone...well, maybe that ass crack one, thats just nasty
  52. Profile photo of thebandit
    thebandit Male 18-29
    363 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:05 pm
    you dont like looking at boxers, i dont like looking at ugly people. things dont always go our way.
  53. Profile photo of carolinads13
    carolinads13 Female 13-17
    151 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:06 pm
    I personally don`t like the trend at all, but I don`t think it`s fair to make it such a harsh penalty. Maybe people should wear other boxers underneath the ones that show, that way you can say it wasn`t showing your underwear... But, honestly, it`s a trend and it will go away soon. Why bother?
  54. Profile photo of boredfjord
    boredfjord Male 13-17
    928 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:08 pm
    Sigh... I guess so. I appreciate both your politeness. Nothing I say will change the law. It just irks me that officers can now go around like private school principles correcting everyone`s improper dress. But irrespective of the legality of seeing someone`s underwear, can we all agree that one should not be punished as harshly for visible underwear as one should be for a DUI?
  55. Profile photo of Marcko98
    Marcko98 Male 18-29
    301 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:17 pm
    Why does it matter to you if your not sagging
  56. Profile photo of s1cKs0uL
    s1cKs0uL Female 18-29
    394 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:19 pm
    Ahh another waste of taxpayer`s dollars-
    they waste there time busting "criminals" for having their underwear showing, but how many pedophiles and tweakers walk the streets unchecked?
    Disgusting.
  57. Profile photo of Slmmhmmr161
    Slmmhmmr161 Male 18-29
    606 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:21 pm
    boredfjord:

    I do agree this should be punished, but not as harshly as this.

  58. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17515 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:22 pm
    It`s about time someone ended this hip hop/rap fashion trend.
  59. Profile photo of Rman1201
    Rman1201 Male 18-29
    247 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:24 pm
    Not a `waste of taxpayer dollars` as a possible, and probably likely punishment is a fee, so it pays for itself.
    Just to correct illogic.
    As for the actual issue, its a horrible law. I hate the look, but the law against it violates the first amendment. I`m not too worried about the issue however, as I`m sure sooner or later it will make it to the supreme court and be shot down.
  60. Profile photo of Maksie99
    Maksie99 Male 18-29
    695 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:25 pm
    Lololol, this was in my English textbook in school.
  61. Profile photo of Blacksun1212
    Blacksun1212 Male 13-17
    268 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:26 pm
    93 day 2 a year wtf so wat if u do like the first pic then this is just stupid might as well just throw out the bill of rights then if they keep on doin stuff like this
  62. Profile photo of nuxnixy12
    nuxnixy12 Male 13-17
    15 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:27 pm
    i understand why people would find the saggy pants look offensive, but to relate it to a hip hop/rap trend is unfair. i sag my pants sometimes, but thats because i find it more comfortable. kids at my school and other schools make fun of it, so its not like its some sort of trend anymore. its slowly disappearing, and the only thing that this law will do is encourage rebellious behavior in my generation.
  63. Profile photo of Slmmhmmr161
    Slmmhmmr161 Male 18-29
    606 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:28 pm
    Rman1201:

    This doesn`t violate the first amendment; which is

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    How is (or almost) committing indecent exposure considered freedom of speech? It`s not. Walking around wearing a t-shirt that says "People Should Eat Aborted Fetuses" in America is legal, because that`s exercising your right to "Freedom of Speech".

  64. Profile photo of iluvpink13
    iluvpink13 Female 18-29
    1414 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:30 pm
    lol
  65. Profile photo of osirisascend
    osirisascend Male 40-49
    3039 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:31 pm
    I don`t think anyone hates the whole baggy pants "fashion" trend more than I do.

    I have to laugh at those who have posted that B.S. about inmates "advertising their sexual availability".

    Nothing could be further from the truth. That little tidbit of misinformation was a rather weak attempt at getting kids to stop doing it.

    The real reason for the baggy pants and long, untucked shirts comes from the street gang culture. Baggy clothing makes it easier to mask concealed weapons. I don`t remember exactly when it was (early `90`s I believe), LAPD officers from the Rampart Division detained several members of the Nine-O Crips clique during a gang sweep.

    While they were being searched, the Police officers were rather amazed to discover that six of the Nine-O Crips they had detained had secured AK-47`s to their legs that were not visible on cursory inspection due the bagginess of their pants.

  66. Profile photo of lemurs366
    lemurs366 Female 18-29
    385 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:38 pm
    actually thr trend started in jails, cause they`re not allowed to wear belts = saggy pants
  67. Profile photo of Mikeado
    Mikeado Male 18-29
    2160 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:39 pm
    That`s crazy that they`re enforcing how to wear jeans. Isn`t that like communism or something? It just seems a bit much. I could understand this being a rule in school, but not a full-on law. And how come a slight arse crack is banned but g-strings on 14-year-olds aren`t?

    I thought baggy trousers came from there being no belts in prison, so if your jeans appear to be falling down, then you actually have a prison look that makes you `Gangsta` or whatever. Ah well. I could be wrong. For all I know it could all have been invented by MC Hammer in an attempt to avoid you touching this.

  68. Profile photo of urbanlegend
    urbanlegend Male 18-29
    741 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:42 pm
    i`d only get a warning anyways
  69. Profile photo of SuperSmash
    SuperSmash Male 18-29
    3758 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:47 pm
    "Baggy clothing makes it easier to mask concealed weapons."

    Just ask our friend Plaxico. But it also makes it easier to slip and then go off when you try to grab it, narrowly missing your junk and even worse, maybe killing an innocent bystander.

    I agree with the law though. If your butt`s hanging out you`re basically mooning everyone around you.

  70. Profile photo of dance4life
    dance4life Female 18-29
    209 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:48 pm
    as long as i can`t see ass crack then who the hell cares
  71. Profile photo of MarthFador
    MarthFador Female 18-29
    1004 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:49 pm
    What I absolutely hate is when someone has a belt on, yet their pants are still hanging around their ankles. Then, of course, their legs can really go too far so they walk like a damn retard. Hate getting stuck behind these freaks in an aisle or hallway anywhere. Makes me wanna yank their pants down and boot their ass.
    Although I love the idea of a law forbidding this, I know it`s not exactly right. It just goes against many things... It`s all been said already, so blah...
  72. Profile photo of SuperSmash
    SuperSmash Male 18-29
    3758 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:49 pm
    Btw, I sag my pants, but that`s because I have long legs and a short torso and if I wore my pants at my waist it`d look like I was an old granpa with my pants up around my armpits. Not a good look.
  73. Profile photo of Pataustin11
    Pataustin11 Male 13-17
    41 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:50 pm
    Those poor poor plumbers...
  74. Profile photo of eggsnham
    eggsnham Male 13-17
    1140 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:54 pm
    i wear baggy pants but its not like im showing anything like in those pictures, i dont know anyone who dresses like that.
  75. Profile photo of 520
    520 Male 13-17
    432 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 2:55 pm
    agreed with dance4life.
  76. Profile photo of WHOISIT12345
    WHOISIT12345 Male 18-29
    4397 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:03 pm
    punisment for either is 93 day to a year in jail
    and/or up to $500 in fines
  77. Profile photo of WHOISIT12345
    WHOISIT12345 Male 18-29
    4397 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:04 pm
    WHAT????!!!!! :(
  78. Profile photo of frumgf
    frumgf Female 18-29
    164 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:05 pm
    flint, michigan? People still live there?
  79. Profile photo of WHOISIT12345
    WHOISIT12345 Male 18-29
    4397 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:05 pm
    SuperSmash
    Male, 18-29, Southern US
    667 Posts Monday, June 01, 2009 2:49:59 PM
    Btw, I sag my pants, but that`s because I have long legs and a short torso and if I wore my pants at my waist it`d look like I was an old granpa with my pants up around my armpits. Not a good look


    me 2 but dad yells it me 2 pull my pant down...

  80. Profile photo of Challenger23
    Challenger23 Female 18-29
    346 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:11 pm
    That is a very short waisted man. His butt is practically in the middle of his back. >.>
  81. Profile photo of BrimstoneOne
    BrimstoneOne Male 30-39
    2229 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:15 pm
    when did Flint Police Department become involved with fashion, and start policing that as well?
  82. Profile photo of BrimstoneOne
    BrimstoneOne Male 30-39
    2229 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:18 pm
    Don`t get me wrong here, I`m personal against these `fashion statements`, but come on one is entitled to freedom of expression, or is that policed as well like every thing else in the States?
  83. Profile photo of krabkat
    krabkat Female 18-29
    1263 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:23 pm
    frumgf "flint, michigan? People still live there?" LOL
    Yeah, they do and they`re all goin` to jail, including all the local construction guys with their butt crack showing - tis only fair!
  84. Profile photo of vegascartman
    vegascartman Male 30-39
    735 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:26 pm
    I wasn`t aware that the Blue Man Group worked for the cops
  85. Profile photo of yofuzzy
    yofuzzy Male 13-17
    310 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:30 pm
    what if you wear no pants?
  86. Profile photo of KatWaffles
    KatWaffles Female 13-17
    74 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:32 pm
    The police over here are getting strickter about that too. It`s all the wanna-be-gangster children going around with their pants hanging down and walkin like one leg is shorter than the other :P
  87. Profile photo of KatWaffles
    KatWaffles Female 13-17
    74 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:35 pm
    Mikeado: "For all I know it could all have been invented by MC Hammer in an attempt to avoid you touching this."
    I LOL`d
  88. Profile photo of simim23
    simim23 Female 18-29
    1429 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:40 pm
    Seriously, I don`t see why you`d even want to walk around like that.
  89. Profile photo of ElleWilde
    ElleWilde Female 13-17
    64 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:46 pm
    "I wasn`t aware that the Blue Man Group worked for the cops"- vegascartman


    haha i find that statement funny

  90. Profile photo of dustercat21
    dustercat21 Female 18-29
    121 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 3:52 pm
    not wearing pants... im pretty sure thats still indecent exposure... i wonder if the fine is the same though
  91. Profile photo of Angelol
    Angelol Male 13-17
    55 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:08 pm
    What if you go commando? Hmmm? or what if you`re an old geezer who doesn`t have the strength to put on a belt and their pants just happened to sag
  92. Profile photo of domisgood
    domisgood Male 18-29
    4868 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:11 pm
    flint is a real place?
    not just somewhere from the film Semi-Pro :O
  93. Profile photo of Rman1201
    Rman1201 Male 18-29
    247 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:12 pm
    Slmmhmmr161 -

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Jo...
    See Texas v Johnson.

    Violations on freedom of expression aren`t limited to explicit speech.
    The first part, the `disorderly conduct` doesn`t even involve any sort of indecent exposure. You could call just about anything disorderly conduct, that doesn`t make it constitutional.
    I could call protests disorderly conduct, bad wigs, going in public wearing a tank top, etc. etc.....

  94. Profile photo of osirisascend
    osirisascend Male 40-49
    3039 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:13 pm
    @ domisgood: Yes, Flint, Michigan is a real place. It`s probably one of the best examples of what can happen to an industrial city when the industry leaves.

    Flint was the city in Michael Moore`s film "Roger & Me".

  95. Profile photo of caboose117
    caboose117 Male 13-17
    1204 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:21 pm
    a harsh punishment for a minor felony i`d say...

    maybe like community service hours + a 50 dollar fine? that`s a little bit more decent?

  96. Profile photo of OldOllie
    OldOllie Male 60-69
    15844 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:32 pm
    Evidently they have a really bad crack problem there.
  97. Profile photo of tangello
    tangello Female 13-17
    901 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:37 pm
    i wish they`d make that a law here... i HATE the baggy pants. it looks like they took a dump and they walk like penguins. ugh. so dumb.
  98. Profile photo of neveryours
    neveryours Female 13-17
    1269 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:39 pm
    i`ve seen this pic before but it had different text on it...
    forgot what it said though
  99. Profile photo of roxidied
    roxidied Female 13-17
    322 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:42 pm
    Fair enough baggy trousers are horrendous.
    But saying it`s indecent exposure because underwear is showing is just unreasonable. A girl could be walking down the street in nothing but frenchies and she`d probably not get in any trouble with the law.
  100. Profile photo of riotDX
    riotDX Male 18-29
    600 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:45 pm
    "maybe like community service hours + a 50 dollar fine? that`s a little bit more decent?"

    imo they should have to wear suspenders for a month. that`ll teach em

  101. Profile photo of Zerocyde
    Zerocyde Male 18-29
    3258 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:48 pm
    Flint is my new hero! hahahahahah! Losers. I think it`s rather unconstitutional, but at least it only affects the retarded, lol.
  102. Profile photo of dm2754
    dm2754 Male 40-49
    3284 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 4:56 pm
    >>osirisascend "I don`t think anyone hates the whole baggy pants "fashion" trend more than I do."

    I don`t know about that time pretty high up there. When my very own children are sagging I give them wedgies.

  103. Profile photo of ImDanny
    ImDanny Male 13-17
    123 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:04 pm
    dm2754, I say this in all seriousness. You are a terrific father.
  104. Profile photo of youngdz79
    youngdz79 Male 30-39
    268 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:08 pm
    The only reason Flint did that is because gangs up there are getting worse than in Detroit and that is how they are ID`ng there selves in public places like school
  105. Profile photo of epimetheus
    epimetheus Male 18-29
    157 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:12 pm
    but then... plumbers would shut down from paying too many fines..
  106. Profile photo of heartx3jess
    heartx3jess Female 18-29
    1578 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:13 pm
    Wow, that kind of pisses me off. Who is to say what people are allowed to wear?
  107. Profile photo of ryan99
    ryan99 Male 13-17
    2346 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:14 pm
    I would have many many many warnings in that case...but nothing else!
  108. Profile photo of Morlaboborla
    Morlaboborla Female 13-17
    29 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:32 pm
    ummmm, we all know Dr. Manhattan doesn`t even WEAR pants....
  109. Profile photo of CaptainPat
    CaptainPat Male 18-29
    1586 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:37 pm
    any one else wondering why that guys boxers are half way to his arm pits? are they saying thats where my pants belong?
  110. Profile photo of Tonyjet
    Tonyjet Male 18-29
    3299 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:42 pm
    hmm outdated fashion statement anyhow, its about time someone tells them that it isnt cool anymore
  111. Profile photo of osirisascend
    osirisascend Male 40-49
    3039 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:43 pm
    *high-fives dm2754 several times*
  112. Profile photo of deathxtra
    deathxtra Male 13-17
    2791 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:52 pm
    Who wears pants nowadays?
  113. Profile photo of lecanard
    lecanard Male 13-17
    2 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:53 pm
    I would wear my pants saggy just to have them arrest me, then fight it under freedom of speech laws.
  114. Profile photo of 2353683
    2353683 Female 70 & Over
    178 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 5:56 pm
    sorry kids,

    this picture is from the 1980s and michael moore used it in his first major film, Roger & Me.

    nice try though

  115. Profile photo of LunarMoon
    LunarMoon Female 13-17
    217 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 6:08 pm
    I would wear my pants saggy just to have them arrest me, then fight it under freedom of speech laws.

    -x-

    That won`t work. You`re not speaking.

  116. Profile photo of lecanard
    lecanard Male 13-17
    2 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 6:17 pm
    That won`t work. You`re not speaking.

    As an act of rhetoric it is considered "speech".
    Cohen, under Cohen v. California, was not speaking either when he walked through a courthouse wearing a t-shirt that said "F*ck the Draft", yet his actions were protected under the first amendment.

  117. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7379 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 6:30 pm
    Saggy pants are indeed stupid but making a crime out of it diminishes what police are supposed to do. This is America land of the free and crap so lets be free. Wgaf if someones sagging(?)
  118. Profile photo of Ddude28
    Ddude28 Male 13-17
    140 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 6:32 pm
    Geeze I agree with deathxtra , who needs pants?!

    That said, now i know why the giant beaver mascot tackled me ripped off my pants and ran away back in the boyscouts.

  119. Profile photo of dm2754
    dm2754 Male 40-49
    3284 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 6:35 pm
    >>madest: "America land of the free and crap".
    For once I agree with you America is the land of crap. lol
  120. Profile photo of ImmortalZach
    ImmortalZach Male 13-17
    438 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:17 pm
    I would wear my pants saggy just to have them arrest me, then fight it under freedom of speech laws.

    -x-

    That won`t work. You`re not speaking.

    *******

    Unless you speak from your bum.

  121. Profile photo of Vindictive
    Vindictive Female 18-29
    1077 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:41 pm
    Michigan has a bucket-full of stupid laws. My family owns a vacation house there up in the north and I lived there for about 6 years. They recently pushed for a law (I`m not sure if this ended up going through) that made it illegal to "be mean" to people. I`m not kidding. The words were literally "be mean".
  122. Profile photo of DavioMagnifi
    DavioMagnifi Male 13-17
    600 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:42 pm
    http://wcco.com/watercooler/sagging.pant...

    haha my friend totally mooned the teacher and pretty much got away with it.
    Recently, he was suspended for 45 days for saying the n word to a black guy after the black guy tried to choke him. Then he got punched in the face. Guess how many days the black guy got for choking and punching him? FIVE. I agree he shouldn`t be cussing but "anger management" shouldn`t mean the kid should only get five days for trying to strangle some one.

  123. Profile photo of baileyabb
    baileyabb Female 18-29
    896 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:42 pm
    f*ck`n eh! I`ll support that dumb law!
    Tight pants on guys is way hotter then the f*cking dirt bag druggie look!
  124. Profile photo of GothicQueen
    GothicQueen Male 13-17
    4376 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:45 pm
    Eh who cares? I may not care much for the look but I don`t think people should go to jail for it. That`s a bit much.
  125. Profile photo of Vindictive
    Vindictive Female 18-29
    1077 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:46 pm
    @baileyabb -high fives-
  126. Profile photo of Thepwnsher
    Thepwnsher Male 13-17
    283 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:49 pm
    "f*ck`n eh! I`ll support that dumb law!
    Tight pants on guys is way hotter then the f*cking dirt bag druggie look!"

    on the other,you would look more of a douche wearing tight pants.

  127. Profile photo of Vindictive
    Vindictive Female 18-29
    1077 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:51 pm
    pwnsher, tight pants are hella sexy on the right guy (ie, a guy on the skinny end of the spectrum), but no one looks good with their pants at their ankles. no one.
  128. Profile photo of Thepwnsher
    Thepwnsher Male 13-17
    283 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:53 pm
    aka highwaters xD i laugh every time i see them...i also noticed something...most of the comments are by females :-P
  129. Profile photo of coldCanuck
    coldCanuck Male 13-17
    296 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:54 pm
    Ironicaly, loss pants look came from people in jail. Because they`d all get the same size, XXL, so the look caught on. And now when your caught with the look you get to see its origin!
  130. Profile photo of KeVsTeR2475
    KeVsTeR2475 Male 13-17
    1843 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 7:54 pm
    this law has been out for a while now.
  131. Profile photo of hagane
    hagane Male 30-39
    967 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:04 pm
    "i wish they`d make that a law here... i HATE the baggy pants. it looks like they took a dump and they walk like penguins. ugh. so dumb."

    LMAO

  132. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15782 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:05 pm
    So then... what`s considered underwear?

    Honest question...

  133. Profile photo of sukitjeezus
    sukitjeezus Female 18-29
    134 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:07 pm
    "Ironicaly, loss pants look came from people in jail. Because they`d all get the same size, XXL, so the look caught on. And now when your caught with the look you get to see its origin!"

    I hear that it was because prisoners wore their pants lower to show that they were open for anal.

  134. Profile photo of DavioMagnifi
    DavioMagnifi Male 13-17
    600 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:18 pm
    "So then... what`s considered underwear?
    Honest question... "

    Yeah, I know people who wear basketball shorts under sweatpants all the time.

  135. Profile photo of Vannak
    Vannak Male 13-17
    211 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:23 pm
    wow, up to a year, wtf?
  136. Profile photo of Rman1201
    Rman1201 Male 18-29
    247 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:28 pm
    For everyone that says "omg that pixzor is 20 million yrs its stupid"
    ---
    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=flint+saggy+pants+l...
  137. Profile photo of DertMerchant
    DertMerchant Male 18-29
    310 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:31 pm
    Umm, that is rigoddamdiculous!
  138. Profile photo of DVLDRVR666
    DVLDRVR666 Male 13-17
    612 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 8:36 pm
    phew, I`d only get a warning
  139. Profile photo of nrvegetarian
    nrvegetarian Female 13-17
    140 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 9:01 pm
    Wow. Don`t you think that`s a little much?
  140. Profile photo of SuperJesus
    SuperJesus Male 13-17
    388 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 9:22 pm
    What`s wrong with underwear showing (as long as there`s a shirt over it). I wear an awesome pac-man belt buckle and it`s uncomfortable to go without.

  141. Profile photo of Suckerpunch
    Suckerpunch Male 18-29
    2 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 10:21 pm
    Got to show this to a friend..
  142. Profile photo of earth159
    earth159 Male 13-17
    21 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 10:22 pm
    wait... wearing boxers in public with NO pants no one even cares... I would know (most people even just assume they`re shorts). So they fining people for just showing a little?
  143. Profile photo of KenshinTW
    KenshinTW Male 18-29
    56 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 10:40 pm
    Im glad this doesn`t apply on women, haha
  144. Profile photo of Steven42
    Steven42 Male 18-29
    173 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 11:09 pm
    What happens when he doesn`t wear boxers, what if he decides to wear a "man-thong?"...
  145. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    June 1, 2009 at 11:45 pm
    and that, my friends, is why flint michigan died.
  146. Profile photo of cman7721
    cman7721 Male 18-29
    618 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 12:42 am
    i just might have to move to flint michigan.
    glorifying the ghetto = stupidest thing on earth.
  147. Profile photo of toqr
    toqr Male 18-29
    199 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 1:43 am
    hahahahaha, only in flint michigan, poor town usa!
  148. Profile photo of Kawoenheim
    Kawoenheim Male 18-29
    35 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 2:46 am
    Don`t get me wrong, I think the "style" is as ridiculous as the next guy, but I`m pretty sure a *year* in jail would make this law a sitting duck to be overturned on appeal for excessiveness.
  149. Profile photo of pookie666
    pookie666 Male 18-29
    78 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 2:59 am
    america: land of the free hahahahahha
  150. Profile photo of -Khaos-
    -Khaos- Male 13-17
    3 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 3:43 am
    Why are they using Dr. Manhattan in the diagram? )-|
  151. Profile photo of partyyyy
    partyyyy Male 18-29
    148 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 3:50 am
    jesus thats abit much!!!
  152. Profile photo of Mo73
    Mo73 Male 30-39
    322 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 4:03 am
    "Michigan has a bucket-full of stupid laws. My family owns a vacation house there up in the north and I lived there for about 6 years. They recently pushed for a law (I`m not sure if this ended up going through) that made it illegal to "be mean" to people. I`m not kidding. The words were literally "be mean"."


    I live in Michigan..that was never a law. It was one city that tried to pass a city ordinance and it never passed. It was never a state thing just a city thing.

  153. Profile photo of -Khaos-
    -Khaos- Male 13-17
    3 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 4:26 am
    What if your pants slipped down to below your buttocks and a policeman happened to see you. Oh oh, that`s a year in jail for you.
  154. Profile photo of Gn0m3
    Gn0m3 Male 18-29
    421 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 6:33 am
    I wanna go to Flint and just run around naked for a while now
  155. Profile photo of panth753
    panth753 Female 18-29
    9184 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 6:44 am
    ahahaha, I love it.
  156. Profile photo of jtrebowski
    jtrebowski Male 40-49
    3348 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 8:08 am
    more right-wing zealotry aimed and controlling the populace. This could potentially open up new fashion laws..."CONFORM....CONFORM!!!"
  157. Profile photo of Shaboobalah
    Shaboobalah Male 18-29
    326 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 8:10 am
    @-Khaos- Then you should buy pants that fit. Novel concept, I realize. I don`t understand how wearing your pants around your knees makes you a gangster.
  158. Profile photo of Ari--
    Ari-- Female 18-29
    119 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 8:54 am
    if everyone had to pay fines or spend some time in jail for fashion crimes, this world would be a boring place. i couldn`t make fun of anyone anymore.
  159. Profile photo of keith2
    keith2 Male 18-29
    2587 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 9:03 am
    ah flint.. such a crappy town. ppl there try n act like their so ghetto. only thing good that came out of there was dayton family.

    Back then black kids started to wear their jeans low. The white kids called it saggin`. Whats saggin spelled backwards? Those sneaky white kids..

  160. Profile photo of Gluggr
    Gluggr Male 18-29
    422 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 10:01 am
    That`s a joke, right?
  161. Profile photo of littlepete50
    littlepete50 Male 18-29
    1359 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 10:03 am
    you americans, where is flint? like which state?
  162. Profile photo of JMoney100
    JMoney100 Male 18-29
    312 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 10:26 am
    Flint, MI

    fckin conservatives...

  163. Profile photo of Victory7
    Victory7 Male 18-29
    362 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 10:50 am
    No, JMoney100, those are not conservatives. They are moralistic, pro-big government sheep who call themselves conservative because they aren`t liberal and anyone who doesn`t blindly support the president IS A TERRORIST (also known as Republicans or neo-conservatives.). True conservatives would be opposed to this because it is not only impossible to enforce, but seems to violate the Bill of Rights.
  164. Profile photo of jinxiejae
    jinxiejae Female 30-39
    2928 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 11:15 am
    lesson "PULL YOUR F*KKIN PANTS UP!"
  165. Profile photo of jmuamy
    jmuamy Female 18-29
    41 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 11:36 am
    lmao!!! seriously?!
  166. Profile photo of JUGGALETTEx0
    JUGGALETTEx0 Female 18-29
    1380 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 12:16 pm
    wtf....did a rapper die and they`re wearing their pants at half mass in mourning?
  167. Profile photo of idiotfilter
    idiotfilter Male 18-29
    3916 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 12:28 pm
    lol @ juggalette....but yeah...i usually where the first style....but on occasion get close to the second...but only because i forget my belt and get lazy....but NEVER the third...that poo is gross and embarrassing!
  168. Profile photo of bellasmommyx
    bellasmommyx Female 18-29
    82 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 12:50 pm
    LOL, I despise saggy pants wearers.
  169. Profile photo of gazzmc
    gazzmc Male 18-29
    10 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 1:40 pm
    drat them, if you`ve got it, flaunt it.
  170. Profile photo of gazzmc
    gazzmc Male 18-29
    10 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 1:41 pm
    JUGGALETTE WTF IS THAT IN YOUR AVATAR
  171. Profile photo of drummfreak
    drummfreak Male 13-17
    62 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 1:53 pm
    I wear mine like half 1st - 2nd but with a belt and long shirts..so.. does that count?
  172. Profile photo of harrydick
    harrydick Male 18-29
    332 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 2:35 pm
    A year in jail for sagging pants? Bet they`re going to make us tuck in our shirts too.
  173. Profile photo of Alpha1971
    Alpha1971 Male 30-39
    364 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 5:00 pm
    hunh. I always thought the police loved this fashion. After all it`s pretty easy to catch people when there pants fall down around their ankles...
  174. Profile photo of The_tru_bob
    The_tru_bob Male 18-29
    181 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 6:35 pm
    lol @ keith2..Well when people have their pants sagging to the point of position three they might as well not be wearing pants. I mean, at that point it`s definently not covering what it was meant to cover in the first place anyway. Most of the time it`s covered by their shirts so I don`t really care.
  175. Profile photo of jar-head
    jar-head Male 13-17
    596 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 8:00 pm
    in Georgia(america Georgia) It`s against the law to wear your pants saggy...as ina fine and or some jail time... it`s "too gang related"
  176. Profile photo of RawckStar
    RawckStar Male 18-29
    22 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 10:24 pm
    if they are going to use it as the second one, why do they buy jeans?
  177. Profile photo of Nakgin
    Nakgin Male 18-29
    5 posts
    June 2, 2009 at 11:13 pm
    They must have already made a lot of money in fines, since they were able to hire the Blue Man Group for this poster
  178. Profile photo of kcdoll
    kcdoll Female 30-39
    2 posts
    June 3, 2009 at 3:53 pm
    `Crackdown` - stop it!! - am I the only one who finds that funny?
  179. Profile photo of fr0d0lives
    fr0d0lives Female 18-29
    611 posts
    June 3, 2009 at 8:06 pm
    okay, the first one isn`t HORRIBLE.... but it`s STUPID to wear pants any lower than that. ugh. people look so dumb.
  180. Profile photo of langercan
    langercan Male 18-29
    1 post
    June 3, 2009 at 11:27 pm
    looks like I won`t be wearing underwear anymore.
  181. Profile photo of invader0tal
    invader0tal Female 13-17
    46 posts
    June 4, 2009 at 5:43 pm
    I honestly see no problem with the pants being dow low as long as they have a super long shirt to cover it...
    Sides...some hot guys have th right to have their underwear show. ^.^
  182. Profile photo of Kaizer250
    Kaizer250 Male 18-29
    777 posts
    June 9, 2009 at 2:20 am
    Damn. The plumber community`s going to be hit hard by that "indecent exposure" charge.
  183. Profile photo of ImmortalZach
    ImmortalZach Male 13-17
    438 posts
    June 10, 2009 at 11:48 pm
    Damn. The plumber community`s going to be hit hard by that "indecent exposure" charge.

    LMAO

  184. Profile photo of MetalicDemon
    MetalicDemon Male 18-29
    1485 posts
    November 15, 2009 at 5:24 pm
    only faggots have their pants down that low anyway

Leave a Reply