Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
Damn, I want a cigarette now.
If you don`t want to get cancer, then don`t.
It`s funny though."kindly piss-off"
Kinda like "Please, shut up"
it was april fools :P
Of course not shadowryder, this is the internetz, you just make sh*t like that up whenever you want to. Sounded good though didn`t it :-)
Wouldn`t be surprised if there was some truth in it though.
lol, whenever I`m smoking and some ass walking by smiles and says; "Those things will kill ya!" I always respond with; "So will sticking your noes in a stranger`s business!"
Just so you know, I`ve never smoked a cigarette in my life.
But anyways, it`s amazing to me how every post in this can be easily separated into smoker, nonsmoker, and anti-smoker.
Do the anti-smokers who walk up to a person smoking and cough or say "smoking is bad" also walk up to people at McDonald`s, waddle and puff out their cheeks, feign a heart attack, or say that fast food is bad and they hope fat people never reproduce? Do they walk into a bar and say they wish everyone in the bar dies of liver failure to get rid of all the depressed losers quicker?
I would certainly hope not. Then why is it acceptable to deride those who use tobacco in designated areas, generally outside and away from others?
Overall, I`ve noted smokers to actually be good people and considerate of nonsmokers. Nonsmokers understand that it`s a choice, and one they don`t agree with. Many nonsmokers even smoke a cigar every now and again. Anti-smokers are dicks.
I`ll answer my own question. From another high tax on other so called "Sins". Don`t worry eventually they`ll get to one of yours, By then it`ll be to late to stop them.
Use that word on IAB and you might get yourself a bit more than a warning next time.
You are such a pussy.
Sometimes, I wish the government wouldn`t regulate the contents in cigarettes. Put in as much chemicals, then at least those supsceptible to it would die faster. Same goes to fatty food too.
sorry but mmmmm no
low self esteem? w.e"
habits??? hmmmm it would be a good arguement if it wasnt a cancer-producing habit.
Rude, but I respect it for some reason.
awww cuz you cant handle someone elses habits?
low self esteem? w.e
sorry but mmmm no
Please throw yourself in front of a moving train. That is all!
Posted in respect!
Your labled as an athiest liberal smoker! Stop arguing with me! I picked out one post you made and you`ve gone to war! Bloody hell..I make one passing statement (about something YOU posted) and you`d think I`d set fire to your granny or something!
Let me rephrase for the hard of IQ aginst my original comment.
"Don`t wind up the Americans. There are a few select among them who tend to implode when you question goverment stat`s or religious fact".
You and I know 99.9% of the UK laugh when our goverment claims anything these days!
Not trying to be an ass, but how do you know that? I`m allergic to garlic. F*cks my sh*t up, big time. But I`ll have a hard time believing the doctor who rubs his chin sagely and says "ah yes, this is due to the penne arribiata you had last saturday"
I don`t know a single smoker who goes around maliciously blowing smoke in the faces of infants. Most of us are conscientious, and try to stick to the ever-decreasing allowed smoking zones.
And as for the whole "smoking is bad for you" meme. Newsflash, we know. So is beer, so is eating bacon for breakfast, so is McDonalds, so is crossing the f*cking street.
We get it. My life, my choice.
And if you choose to hang out in a designated smoking area (whatever few square feet are left), and thereafter suffer from chronic lung disease, then that`s your choice of wher to hang out.
Besides, who knows, maybe you just have athsma? Just sa
motownc. Rule no 1! Dont post ANYTHING you can not back up! I was simply replyiny to your BS statement about GMT and us inventing time! We did not! Anything you try to argue is irrelevant!
Oh and stop watching so much Star Trek! Time IS linear for us so deal with it!
Thanks a lot, cigarettes! Your harmful chemicals and toxic gases are raising the percentage of young people with breathing problems and slowly killing off others in various ways. I hope those of you who support this type of thing are happy with yourselves! :-D
...Yeah, I`m obviously still pretty ticked from when my doctor told me I had that kind of problem.
Or at the very least visit, so I can steal one of those signs.
A, I was being somewhat facetious on the inventing time thingy. Time is an abstract concept created by a race of beings living in a 3 dimensional world trying to comprehend a 4th dimension. Time isn`t linear, hours minutes, days or weeks have no real meaning. It`s just our feeble attempt at trying to comprehend something beyond our sphere of understanding.
B, You are having a go at me for something I didn`t write.
So, who`s a bit silly? Thicko.
Do your own thing..stay away from what you disagree with!
Of course not all smokers develop cancer...the idea of that is simply ludicrous! But it has been proven time and time again beyond reasonable doubt that smoking is not healthy.
Let`s skip the whole lung cancer thing for a second. Simple common sense tells us that breathing in harmful substances isn`t exactly wise.
But, of course, smoking is an addiction. The thought of that next fag...the thought of that buzz...gah I bet its so good you could practically...die?
But hold on, Angilion, I quote here: [quote] People may have died horribly for your drug habit. Does that give you a thrill of power or something? I have more respect for druggies who burgle houses to get stuff to fence for money for their next fix. [/quote]
Lolwut?, as the kids say these days. You`ve got more respect for the heroin addict who breaks into your home and sells your laptop, car, and wife`s panties on Ebay to feed his underground drug habit than you do for your work colleague who takes an occasional cigarette break in a designated smoking area?
May I respectfully suggest that that`s a wee bit strong?
"The fact is that half of all smokers eventually die from cancer, or other smoking-related illnesses. And a quarter of smokers die in middle age, between 35 and 69."--------------------------------------------------Double LOL at you for buying into the modern scientific method which has been raped silly by goverments in the last 50 years. A "link too" isnt "proof of". Smoking is linked to cancer because more smokers develop lung cancer (for example)..but not ALL smoker develop lung cancer! John Snow
(I still don`t get why UK and US date formats are different...surely theres no need for it??)
If not smoking can potentially keep me here a bit longer, then that`s what I intend to do.
I think most people would feel the same way if they weren`t bound to their addiction.
I have more respect for druggies who burgle houses to get stuff to fence for money for their next fix.
Interestingly enough, the average North American residential household is responsible for less than 10% of the global pollution. Industries, the gigantic cargo boats and extremely heavy machinery is what causes most of the pollution...
(I made up the 10%, but it`s to discern that it`s a small fraction)
"Smoking is responsible for more than one in five U.S. deaths. About half of all regular cigarette smokers will eventually be killed by their addiction."
Yeah, i know its about the US, but still
"The fact is that half of all smokers eventually die from cancer, or other smoking-related illnesses. And a quarter of smokers die in middle age, between 35 and 69."