The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 36    Average: 3.4/5]
96 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 8400
Rating: 3.4
Category:
Date: 01/19/09 09:01 AM

96 Responses to Should Dad Pay Child Support If Kids Aren`t His?

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18942 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 8:34 am
    Link: Should Dad Pay Child Support If Kids Aren`t His? - Dad is ordered to continue paying child support even after DNA test proves that his wife`s kids aren`t his.
  2. Profile photo of yoimmylene
    yoimmylene Female 13-17
    2065 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:05 am
    That ain`t fair. D=
  3. Profile photo of VikingGuy
    VikingGuy Male 18-29
    2160 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:08 am
    not yours = not your responsibility
  4. Profile photo of myrikal
    myrikal Male 30-39
    67 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:09 am
    F**K THAT S**T! Kill that bitch and the judge.
  5. Profile photo of Llamaz
    Llamaz Male 13-17
    339 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:09 am
    That`s actually a tough decision on the judge`s part.
  6. Profile photo of spp
    spp Female 18-29
    299 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:11 am
    I think if he wants to keep the relationship with the kids and therefore taking a fatherly role he should keep up the payments.

    If he decides he doesn`t care for the kids then he shouldn`t pay.

  7. Profile photo of plowerd
    plowerd Male 18-29
    334 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:11 am
    this is not different than adopting a kid and then divorcing your wife. you still gotta pay.
  8. Profile photo of Sociophobic
    Sociophobic Male 18-29
    367 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:18 am
    I agree with spp on this one.
  9. Profile photo of Hylian4Hire
    Hylian4Hire Female 18-29
    329 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:19 am
    Well, at least he`s only got two years of it left... but that`s still utter bulls**t.
  10. Profile photo of aero
    aero Male 18-29
    886 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:20 am
    "not yours = not your responsibility"

    But they are his, they just aren`t technically/scientifically his, but like the judge said, he`s the only father they`ve ever known. Just because he recently discovered he isn`t the biological father, he`s still the father, I`m sure his kids still call him dad. And even though his now ex-wife cheated on him, his `kids` shouldn`t suffer because he`s angry with his ex-wife and refuses to help pay for their well-being.

  11. Profile photo of gamesguy
    gamesguy Male 18-29
    1 post
    January 19, 2009 at 9:31 am
    The husband has been a victim of fraud. Plain and simple. It is too late to get the money back but child support payments should legally stop. If he wants to continue to pay something voluntarily to keep the relationship with his children that should be his decision. What is the point of a DNA test if the results do not change the situation?
  12. Profile photo of apermal
    apermal Male 18-29
    322 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:32 am
    In that case, why doesn`t the judge disallow her from asking for an increase in payments and decreasing the visitation time.

    You`re asking the guy to pay more money and visit less for kids that aren`t even his?

  13. Profile photo of Trexa
    Trexa Female 18-29
    283 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:32 am
    I think he should have to pay. He raised the children like they were his, even though he isn`t the biological father, if he still wants to visit the kids, he should have to pay. Wouldn`t it be terrible to be one of the children to think "Oh, now that my dad proved he`s not my father, he doesn`t want anything to do with me anymore."?
  14. Profile photo of hamalina
    hamalina Male 18-29
    131 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:35 am
    This is the best decision that could have been taken with regards to the welfare of the two kids. The father has to be angry at the mother and take actions against her, instead of those who have loved him and depended on him for 16 years.
  15. Profile photo of manicwhite
    manicwhite Male 18-29
    169 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:37 am
    wow. i kind of see were the judge is coming from, but by doing it its punishing the dad for being a good guy. if hed took action when the kids were born and got a dna test then, he wouldnt have had to pay anything. i think the father should be incouraged to continue paying child support. but one the chilldren reach 18 the mother and the biological father should be brought to cort and charged for fraud( if the mother cant remeber who she slept with she should be held total responsible)
  16. Profile photo of manicwhite
    manicwhite Male 18-29
    169 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:39 am
    i alos dont know how it works in american but in england if the father was alowed to stop paying child support. then the goverment would then pay the family child support
  17. Profile photo of apermal
    apermal Male 18-29
    322 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:44 am
    I agree with most of the comments, but what do you`ll think of the increase and decrease in payments and visitations then? Should`nt he be cut some slack?
  18. Profile photo of Thlayli
    Thlayli Male 18-29
    9 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:45 am
    Only Americans can judge that stupid.

    Sure, the kids DO have the right to not be penalized. So, either the state (read: the community) or the REAL father has to pay, once found. I prefer the latter option.

    But saying: "C`mon, you`ve been paying for years already. Now you gotta pay your whole life" is simply stupid.

  19. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:46 am
    Making him pay child support if he still wants to be considered their dad = fair.
    Suing the woman for fraud = fair.
  20. Profile photo of Winter_ICE_0
    Winter_ICE_0 Male 13-17
    976 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:47 am
    Answer: No
  21. Profile photo of 4EVA_Awesome
    4EVA_Awesome Male 13-17
    291 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:49 am
    Okay. Im going to break this down. If the husband decides to sue the ex wife for fraud he will win. That was not the trial from this article. Fraud however is only fraud if the party is aware of their deciet, but if he can PROVE, she knew, the bitch would go down hard and fast.

    To the issue. Its very tough. I think whats happened here, but is not stated, is that this man still demands visitation, and the judge has said only if you keep paying child support. If he declined visitation, he wouldnt have to pay, and on the of chance this judge didnt see it that way, which I very very highly doubt, a simple appeal to a higher court would do the trick. This story and article is not a very good account of events or the situation in its intirety. What Ive said, Though a guess, is an educated guess, and Im quite sure is mostly to completly correct. This is a very vauge account, so I wouldnt give the article that much thought, and would research it completly before deciding anything.

  22. Profile photo of trio
    trio Male 18-29
    27 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:52 am
    um, you do know this is from canada right?
  23. Profile photo of AnwarNova
    AnwarNova Male 18-29
    2076 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:53 am
    to people in europe, canada and america are the same thing. they claim to be a lot more aware about the world, but in this area...there`s no difference. I don`t really blame them really. Canada, America`s hat.
  24. Profile photo of Lockon
    Lockon Male 18-29
    376 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 9:58 am
    Wow, thats a load of BS for sure.
  25. Profile photo of splurbyburbl
    splurbyburbl Male 30-39
    2798 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:02 am
    Nope... I say that if the Father has to keep paying, then the woman has to have her clitoris surgically removed as well as her tubes tied. I think that is totally fair.

    I mean, so let`s be real here. The wife has an affair, breaks a legal marriage contract and the only three people to be punished are the two kids and the Dad? I don`t call that justice. Nope, take away the two kids and give them to Daddy. The Mom can have them once a month.

  26. Profile photo of DHise
    DHise Male 13-17
    868 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:02 am
    As said before; if he still wants to be the kid`s acting father (regardless of DNA testing) then yes, he should pay for child support.
  27. Profile photo of apermal
    apermal Male 18-29
    322 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:07 am
    Agreed with splurbyburbl
  28. Profile photo of VirtualParty
    VirtualParty Male 18-29
    787 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:10 am
    Wtf stupid slut.
  29. Profile photo of Boredx12
    Boredx12 Female 13-17
    1654 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:13 am
    If he wants to be their dad then mebbe he should... But the wife should get sued or something at least...
  30. Profile photo of VirtualParty
    VirtualParty Male 18-29
    787 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:15 am
    drat the kids I bet he doesn`t even give a drat about them at this point. I know I wouldn`t! They`re not even his.
  31. Profile photo of Thlayli
    Thlayli Male 18-29
    9 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:16 am

    To whom it may concern:

    To me, even the UK is America.

    Or should I say UKUSA (UK, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, google that).

    UK is just the freakin` 51st state and gives a poo about the "real" continental Europe.

  32. Profile photo of aero
    aero Male 18-29
    886 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:18 am
    VV Not only is that off-topic, it made no sense
  33. Profile photo of burnin_roses
    burnin_roses Female 18-29
    289 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:21 am
    I think the dad should be able to take the kids and have the mom pay him.

    I mean its not saying that he is disowning them, that he doesn`t love them he`s just p!ssed because his wife cheated on him and been paying for someone elses kids. I mean I would be ticked off too if I were him.

  34. Profile photo of Skyira
    Skyira Female 18-29
    1134 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:21 am
    i think that the woman should pay attention to whom ever she f*cks. i think the guy shouldn`t pay for child support if the children aren`t his. and i agree to Splurbyburbl, if the dad had to pay for child support the woman have to tie her tubes and remove her sexual organs and only allow to visit her kids once a month.
  35. Profile photo of Mo73
    Mo73 Male 30-39
    322 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:22 am
    what a slut bitch. F no don`t pay. Still see them if you want but I would fight this. BS men always get drated. BITCH
  36. Profile photo of i-am-horny
    i-am-horny Male 13-17
    1053 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:23 am
    SLUT
    silly bitch
  37. Profile photo of Tonyjet
    Tonyjet Male 18-29
    3298 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:24 am
    double standard here, as usual,

    do you really want "equal" rights?????

  38. Profile photo of Kay62442
    Kay62442 Female 13-17
    731 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:38 am
    I don`t think the lady should have custody.
  39. Profile photo of Thlayli
    Thlayli Male 18-29
    9 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:38 am
    @aero

    You`re too young. Look at the world for a time long enough and you`ll find the sense.

  40. Profile photo of dreadqueen00
    dreadqueen00 Female 18-29
    331 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:42 am
    Ok, enough about the "slut bitch," that isn`t even the issue.

    Read the article: it`s not about the parents, it`s about the kids. That is the ONLY thing that should matter in this case. Yes, it SUCKS that this guy found out he`s not the real father of his kids. Yes, that woman is a bitch for having an affair and lying about it all these years. But those girls shouldn`t have to pay because of their mother`s mistake. They need their father`s support, whether he`s their blood or not. Like the article said, he`s the only father they`ve ever known. The guy needs to swallow his pride and support his children.

  41. Profile photo of 1williamsg
    1williamsg Male 18-29
    326 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:43 am
    he shouldn`t have to pay
    but he should pay if he still loves them but it shpould be his choice
  42. Profile photo of Lord_Panda
    Lord_Panda Male 18-29
    120 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:44 am
    What a remarkable presentation of fair justice. Almost daddy gets to keep paying for someone else kids.

    Though I understand why the state is allowing this, if the kinda father wouldn`t have to pay anything she would perhaps receive some form of goverment hand-outs, and that`s money off from the goverment...
    Following the money trail leads one to answer many times.

  43. Profile photo of dreadqueen00
    dreadqueen00 Female 18-29
    331 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:45 am
    Oh and...I do agree with Baalthazaq and others. The woman should definitely suffer some repercussion--lawsuit, etc. She deserves to be punished.
  44. Profile photo of Robert_D
    Robert_D Male 18-29
    589 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:48 am
    Alright, just to give some context to those who care (not sure anyone will).

    The law in Ontario creates what is known as "social parents" which is, it creates liability for child support between children and people who stand in the place of a parent, whether or not there is a biological link. Think of, for example, step-parents. Even if you don`t go through the trouble of doing a proper adoption, if you care for them from the age of 3 until 15, you are considered a parent for the purposes of child support.

    The reason for this is that they want to minimize the amount of social assistance the government has to pay out, and they think the best way to do this is to make as many people as possible responsible for the child, including their biological parents. (So theoretically the biological father, and this man, could both be paying child support, although in that case the biological father would probably be paying more).

    It might not be fair, but at least now you why.

  45. Profile photo of yudontn0me
    yudontn0me Male 18-29
    845 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:59 am
  46. Profile photo of SarahJ86
    SarahJ86 Female 18-29
    495 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 11:03 am
    Its a tough one. I do feel for the Dad in more ways that one - and if we`re talking real justice and firness, then no it doesnt seem fair or an example of justice. I understand why its done though. If you have brought up kids, looked after them and acted as a father - then whether they are biologically yours or not, you are their father. By saying he does not have to pay because they are not biologically his undermines adoptive relationships or other family types which are completely legitimate and loving. I think the fact that he did not know that they were not his does make it a questionable issue though.
  47. Profile photo of Lord_Panda
    Lord_Panda Male 18-29
    120 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 11:07 am
    SarahJ86
    "By saying he does not have to pay because they are not biologically his undermines adoptive relationships"

    In a situation of adoption, one usually is aware that the children aren`t his/hers. In this case however, he was made to believe that the offspring is his.
    And for the undermining, cases where one spouse can do whatever pleases them, and get paid for it, courages that sort of behavior. That undermines traditional family.

  48. Profile photo of SarahJ86
    SarahJ86 Female 18-29
    495 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 11:15 am
    Lord_Panda.. if you had continued to read my post you would have seen that I had highlighted the obvious difference between this case and adoption.

    You would also hope that it is the children who receive the money, since they are grown teenagers. Of course, it would be speculation to say who would beneit from the cash.

  49. Profile photo of Lord_Panda
    Lord_Panda Male 18-29
    120 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 11:20 am
    I agree. Child support should go to the children`s needs and care.

    And I think this issue is about the morality of allowing such scam to continue.
    On the states part it`s about money, namely state`s money that doesn`t have to be handed out to the mother as long as the man pays. Shows upstanding citizenship and moral code from the mother to continue demanding money after the fact.

  50. Profile photo of ilovem0nkey
    ilovem0nkey Female 18-29
    338 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 11:28 am
    They still arn`t his kids...

    His wife is a lying Bitch.. He shouldn`t be punished for that.

    She needs to remember this affair she isn`t aware of but obviously had. And get that idiot to pay.

    Just because he is only the "dad" they know doesn`t mean that he should have to pay. Once he learned that they aren`t his, then he should have the choice to continue support or not... not a Judge.

  51. Profile photo of heresjonny
    heresjonny Male 13-17
    104 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 11:33 am
    Next heather Mills lol
  52. Profile photo of itsallfake
    itsallfake Male 30-39
    474 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:01 pm
    This really just comes down to money that the state gets. When the father pays child support the state gets a cut. If the judge ruled in favor of the guy, then that means the woman and the state may be put in a position to possibly have to give the money back. Add in the fact that the state will continue to collect for the next 2 years, again, the state wants the money. Financially speaking, i don`t think he should be financially responsible for them. If they have a good relationship that`s great. I have had a father son relationship with my stepfather for over 30 years, but if for some reason my parents were to divorce, there is no way i would expect my dad (stepdad) to be responsible for me if something were to happen and i needed money, or help. He might be my dad, but he is not my father, and i cant expect him to have the same responsibilities as my father. Same goes here, he was their dad, not their father.
  53. Profile photo of FxyRoxy777
    FxyRoxy777 Female 18-29
    652 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:01 pm
    "because he`s the only father they`ve ever known"? seriously, the guy shouldn`t have to pay for this. that being said, they are pretty much HIS children. he`s loved them for the past 16 years. so i`m sure he will at least help with bills. although he should not be forced to do a thing
  54. Profile photo of yofuzzy
    yofuzzy Male 13-17
    310 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm
    she doesnt remember the affair? what a drating bitch
  55. Profile photo of videogamer
    videogamer Male 18-29
    3016 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm
    Here`s the big problem in this case:

    - If he pays, his ex-wife Cheaty McSlut doesn`t get properly punished for her actions.
    - If he doesn`t pay, the kids who see him as a father figure will suffer.

    It`s a lose-lose situation.

  56. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:07 pm
    I think the people saying "someone" needs to pay for the kids need to consider that the state should not be allowed to choose someone at random to pay for them.

    The state here is shirking it`s responsibility in favour of giving it to some poor sap who got conned.

    Of course the kids need to be taken care of, there are 7 billion people on earth though, and you`re putting the burden on him, who likely has already paid over $400`000 to raise these two.

    It will not be fair until he sues her, for at the very least $400`000. $800`000 would not be an unreasonable figure here either for compensation.

  57. Profile photo of itsallfake
    itsallfake Male 30-39
    474 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:09 pm
    The real problem comes from the mother. The mother should be criminally charged with fraud and possibly larceny. She lied and claimed the kids were his, then stole money from him based on that lie. The child support judge might make his decision, and that is all well and good. But the father should be working with a lawyer from now until those kids turn 18 to build up a criminal case against the mother and have her charged with fraud and larceny. Screw civil litigation, he wouldn`t collect anyway. Throw her ass in jail, send her ass to county were some butch dyke will teach her the pain of being screwed over for 12 years...
  58. Profile photo of Webz
    Webz Male 18-29
    542 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:12 pm
    He shouldn`t HAVE to, but if he has raised the kids as their father he should want to.
  59. Profile photo of yofuzzy
    yofuzzy Male 13-17
    310 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:18 pm
    i completly agree with its all fake. also webz, yeah he should want to pay. but he definatly should not have to. he doesnt even get to keep the kids that he has to pay for that arent his? thats bull
  60. Profile photo of nokirarr
    nokirarr Male 13-17
    90 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:21 pm
    As if having a person that looks exactly alike you in the cough isn`t enough...
  61. Profile photo of AnwarNova
    AnwarNova Male 18-29
    2076 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:24 pm
    thiayli, someones been reading too much propaganda. that`s fine, as long as you don`t share with everyone else! :-D
  62. Profile photo of SPrinkZ
    SPrinkZ Male 18-29
    2284 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:25 pm
    "this is not different than adopting a kid and then divorcing your wife. you still gotta pay."

    Uh, no. It`s actually completely different.

  63. Profile photo of Pilanus
    Pilanus Male 18-29
    675 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 12:27 pm
    Personally, if just being the father figure makes you responsible for paying for their care, than damn it, he should have the right to them.

    I think the mother should be arrested for fraud, and the children go into the custody of the father figure...

  64. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 1:07 pm
    "Only Americans can judge that stupid."

    I agree... because of course Ontario is in the US right?


    Ok I have the simple solution that would make sense for everyone.

    You give the `Dad` custody of the kids. And force the whore I mean mother, and the biological father of the kids to pay him child support.

    Punish the people who are at fault

  65. Profile photo of TrixieBlue
    TrixieBlue Female 40-49
    1063 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 1:14 pm
    NO, he should not be held responsible. It`s NOT his kids!!
  66. Profile photo of dopenuts
    dopenuts Male 30-39
    67 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 1:21 pm
    hellz no he shouldn`t. i think i remember a lesbian couple who used a sperm bank to get pregnant, then the lesbians broke up and the mother that received custody sued the donor "father" and won child support from him. or something like that.
  67. Profile photo of quick_sand8
    quick_sand8 Female 40-49
    466 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 1:38 pm
    He raised those kids as his own for 16 yrs. I think the dad and the kids are the ones who get the short end of the stick on this one. He should continue to pay for the kids which he thought and raised thinking they were his, BUT, NO MONEY goes to the Mother, NONE!!! It goes into a TRUST fund, allocated to the kids for clothes, education, etc. from a court appointed moderator!! Not one friggen dime should go to the Mother, SHE committed FRAUD, not the Father or the two kids!!!
    Get two jobs honey!!!! Sorry!!! You play, you pay!!!!
  68. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3431 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 1:49 pm
    Goddamn PTK, that`s a pretty friggin awesome Idea there.
  69. Profile photo of quiknas
    quiknas Male 18-29
    451 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 2:05 pm
    it`s too bad for the kids caught in the middle of this whole mess... while infidelity is definitely no way to solve a problem, it`s hard to pass judgement without knowing more details about the relationship between mom and dad. he seems like a decent guy though, at least taking responsibility. i really hope the money was used correctly, but i`m guessing it wasn`t~
  70. Profile photo of sixclaws13
    sixclaws13 Male 18-29
    2314 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 2:33 pm
    That is complete bullsh*t. What the hell is wrong with modern society? She cuts back his visitation, demands more money, lies about cheating on him, and then the judge supports her? That woman and the judge both need to be slapped and the woman needs to repay every cent he gave her.
  71. Profile photo of RPossum
    RPossum Male 30-39
    1095 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 2:58 pm
    Disappointing. The father should counter sue for entrapment and fraud. He has rights too, it is not the childrens right to recieve payment from a man they are familiar with. It is their right to recieve support from their father.
    If he was made aware and then adopted the children that would make sense that he now pay, otherwise, they are not his kids.
  72. Profile photo of whipsmart
    whipsmart Female 18-29
    665 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 3:11 pm
    "Cornelio`s wife claims she has no memory of having any affair and has no idea who the actual dad might be."

    TOTAL B.S.

  73. Profile photo of PinkAndGreen
    PinkAndGreen Female 13-17
    917 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 3:41 pm
    That`s horrible.

    Just because he was lied to all these years and found out the truth means that he has to keep paying for it!?

  74. Profile photo of Kaizer250
    Kaizer250 Male 18-29
    777 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 3:50 pm
    Well, it`s the same thing as adoption isn`t it. If they had adopted kids, who had then lived with them for 16 years, and then the parents separated, the father should still have to pay child support, despite their not being his, biologically.
    Admittedly the wife is a b*tch, who should receive repercussions for what she did, but, whether the father likes it or not, the kids are still his, as much as they are anybody`s, and he should have to pay child support. Ideally, the father should have received custody after this, and the wife should have to pay child support, but the judge didn`t really side with the wife, she sided with the kids.
  75. Profile photo of thesandwich
    thesandwich Male 18-29
    150 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 3:54 pm
    okay this is horrible, is it not bad enough that it is already to geared to give the woman nearly everything? But now she doesn`t even have to be honest about it. She committed adultery, which in a few states is against the law, and then essentially charged him for it. I think that the children should be supported until the age of 18. They are already 16, and then she should pay back every cent with interest.

    It is sad the kids are caught in the middle of this, but the man needs to make a living too. And he should not be forced to pay for someone else`s mistake.

  76. Profile photo of TalcumX
    TalcumX Male 50-59
    561 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 4:16 pm
    Tell the kids that their mom is a slut who has been lying to them all of their lives and defrauding a man who has loved and supported them all of their lives. Let the kids decide, but do not give that bitch another dime. When the kids turn 18, sue the crap out of her until she is penniless.
    Or he could take her out on a date. One bullet ought to do it.
  77. Profile photo of addler
    addler Male 13-17
    777 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 5:10 pm
    this is not like adoption at all, it is more like forced adoption if anything because the guy did not want to adopt kids at all.

    what should happen though, is he pays child support two more years and once the kids are 18 they can go and do whatever while the wife gets sued back to the stone age

  78. Profile photo of fillemorte
    fillemorte Female 18-29
    741 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 5:29 pm
    this should be on maury
  79. Profile photo of Pindragon
    Pindragon Male 18-29
    600 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 6:13 pm
    That is bullpoo...

    What a bloody whore.

  80. Profile photo of harrydick
    harrydick Male 18-29
    332 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 8:21 pm
    Dad takes the kids in and makes the whore pay child support.

    How difficult is that?

  81. Profile photo of sixclaws13
    sixclaws13 Male 18-29
    2314 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 8:52 pm
    "Well, it`s the same thing as adoption isn`t it."

    No, not any more than my friends adopted me because I spend a lot of time with them.

  82. Profile photo of Loxen
    Loxen Female 30-39
    1387 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:15 pm
    I gotta side with the guy, not his kids not his burden. Just because slutty mommy manipulated the situation in her favor to where he`s the only daddy they know, dosn`t mean he should have to pay for her Ill deeds till those kids are full grown.

    But then again, I also don`t think guys should have to pay child support if they wish to terminate the pregnancy but have no say in the matter. I really think a guy should be able to get papers signed that state they wished to terminate but the mother refused. Thus waivering the child support requirement.

  83. Profile photo of jdjd5883
    jdjd5883 Male 18-29
    883 posts
    January 19, 2009 at 10:32 pm
    uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh NO!
  84. Profile photo of Tisjokar
    Tisjokar Male 18-29
    985 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 2:35 am
    Course not
  85. Profile photo of BunnyNaku
    BunnyNaku Female 18-29
    5224 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 2:52 am
    i think if he adopted the kids then yes.. BUT if he didnt.. and they werent his.. sorry mom but them checks aint yours NO MORE XD
  86. Profile photo of Devi3000
    Devi3000 Female 18-29
    1497 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 3:21 am
    Nope. He should not be made to pay. The mom needs to go after the biological father.
  87. Profile photo of pmarren
    pmarren Male 40-49
    4575 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 5:30 am
    Not only should the guy not have to pay, but he should get a REFUND for any child support he`d paid in the past.

    If mommy continues her lying B.S. story about not "remembering", she can get a frickin` job and pay for the kids herself.

  88. Profile photo of freedan104
    freedan104 Male 18-29
    79 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 6:58 am
    I really hope they appeal and get a reverse judgement.
  89. Profile photo of BigBossDogg
    BigBossDogg Male 30-39
    132 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 8:44 am
    This is a total wrong, not only should the Mother be ordered to pay him back 10 years worth of child support she should also have to face fruad charges.

    Laws concerning children are totally baised towards Mothers.

  90. Profile photo of Mantistador
    Mantistador Male 18-29
    2200 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 6:19 pm
    she should either pay it all back with interest or he gets to bang her into an honest woman...
  91. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 7:16 pm
    Man, the dad must feel kinda like a douche arguing for his right not to pay these kids.
  92. Profile photo of JimboH
    JimboH Male 30-39
    603 posts
    January 20, 2009 at 8:03 pm
    Well, I can honestly say that I`m stumped on this one. I just don`t know the answer and could go either way on it.

    I`m sure that if I read through IAB comments, I`ll find some nugget of truth that will lead me to the light, but my brain hurts right now and I`m going to choose to remain ignorant.

  93. Profile photo of vicious_liar
    vicious_liar Male 13-17
    1226 posts
    January 21, 2009 at 9:38 am
    No I don`t think so. You don`t pay for you neighbours dog too, do you? This is bs, if I was that judge I`d charge HER with fraud.
  94. Profile photo of duffytoler
    duffytoler Male 40-49
    5195 posts
    January 21, 2009 at 10:57 am
    Woman judge, figures.
  95. Profile photo of michaelcsr
    michaelcsr Male 40-49
    559 posts
    January 21, 2009 at 12:27 pm
    This just pisses me off. He wouldn`t have been so close to them, or even helped raise them if she hadn`t liked and said they were his kids. If he loves the kids, and I am sure he does, then he should be given a choice to support them, and have as much visitation as he and the kids want. The lying bitch should have no say in it. I think if he loves the kids he can support them but his ex needs to pay him damages for fraud. And then face charges for filing a false claim of paternity to the province.
  96. Profile photo of astridhaze
    astridhaze Female 18-29
    738 posts
    January 28, 2009 at 6:49 am
    I thought this article made an excellent point. It`s not about the mom or dad, but the kids. Too many people get wrapped up in their own crap that they forget the real victims, those two kids.

    I think the bio mom should be penalized for fraud- not her children.

    As for the father, he needs to get his head of his ass and continue to support those kids. Biology is not the sole determination of fatherhood.

Leave a Reply