The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 27    Average: 2.6/5]
62 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 16586
Rating: 2.6
Category:
Date: 12/26/08 06:30 PM

62 Responses to Wal-Mart Yanks Pink Novelty Panties Off Rack

  1. Profile photo of panda812
    panda812 Female 18-29
    1 post
    December 26, 2008 at 6:31 pm
    Link: Wal-Mart Yanks Pink Novelty Panties Off Rack - Who thinks these panties are too risque?
  2. Profile photo of cahalla
    cahalla Female 18-29
    961 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:35 pm
    What?!?!? Whats wrong w/ them they aren`t even thongs!!
  3. Profile photo of luckyse7en
    luckyse7en Male 13-17
    2397 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:38 pm
    So what!? I`ve seen T shirts more offending than that.
  4. Profile photo of DuckBoy87
    DuckBoy87 Male 18-29
    3289 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:41 pm
    "I can be a hooker?!"
    `Well you don`t want to be... hell, go out there and be the best damn hooker you can be`
    "`Oh captain my captain!`"
    `In your case, get the money up front.`
  5. Profile photo of Charmonster
    Charmonster Female 13-17
    24 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:43 pm
    ...because the LOGICAL thing to assume is that, y`know, girls shouldn`t worry about financial issues since they have a cooter and will someday have a sugar daddy (or a pimp) who goes by "Santa"

    Assuming that the phrase was intended to mean something innocent like, "Santa`s gonna bring you all sorts of gifts, so you don`t need to worry about spending money on yourself" is completely ludicrous.

  6. Profile photo of maxell
    maxell Male 18-29
    285 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:45 pm
    thats kinda stupid if i girl wants to be a little slut then let her. although dont tell her parents lol.
  7. Profile photo of NeurolRu
    NeurolRu Female 18-29
    74 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:49 pm
    People need to relax.
  8. Profile photo of beeze72
    beeze72 Male 30-39
    207 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:54 pm
    Wow....somewhere there is a buyer for the company that thought those would be a good idea
  9. Profile photo of parkm
    parkm Male 13-17
    742 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 6:56 pm
    I know Char,thats what I was thinking
    that`s ridiculous
  10. Profile photo of basketkase
    basketkase Male 18-29
    1183 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:05 pm
    ahahahahah thats great. a moneypot between there legs....
  11. Profile photo of neveryours
    neveryours Female 13-17
    1269 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:10 pm
    stuuuuupid...
    people have perverted everything to such an extent that now people assume that everything has a root of "evil"
  12. Profile photo of AnwarNova
    AnwarNova Male 18-29
    2076 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:17 pm
    I like noticing the age group of people who say there`s nothing wrong with them.
  13. Profile photo of britt566
    britt566 Female 18-29
    2290 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:20 pm
    I have seen pantys before that had two cherrys on the front. It was in the little girls section.
  14. Profile photo of maxxb117
    maxxb117 Male 18-29
    387 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:22 pm
    Haha. Wow. And I think it`s "risk"?
  15. Profile photo of maxxb117
    maxxb117 Male 18-29
    387 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:23 pm
    Or, risky... never mind
  16. Profile photo of spazking
    spazking Male 18-29
    301 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:27 pm
    .........imagine where you would swipe it.......
  17. Profile photo of 2472192
    2472192 Male 13-17
    121 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:31 pm
    when i saw the page come up i was like FOXNEWS???....the crap of new`s sources?...but then i saw the panties and i was like..ooooooooo..haha.
  18. Profile photo of SamVimes
    SamVimes Male 30-39
    619 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:31 pm
    Just leave out the word Rack and this could be the best name for a link in I-A-B history.
  19. Profile photo of psyndrone
    psyndrone Male 30-39
    67 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:35 pm
    Very interesting.
  20. Profile photo of TrixieBlue
    TrixieBlue Female 40-49
    1063 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:49 pm
    It is kinda slutty. But my question is why is Wal-Mart being so careful with this sorta thing but yet a long while back there was this girl who had bought some sandals that really fked up her feet. She got a rash and went though a lot of pain but it took practically an act of God for Wal-Mart to even recognize that there was a problem and remove those sandals. Something to think about...
  21. Profile photo of Silverlake
    Silverlake Male 13-17
    766 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 7:52 pm
    "I like noticing the age group of people who say there`s nothing wrong with them."

    you mean 13-17, 18-29, thats about half the age ranges on this site, it wasnt only 13-17 this time

    ontopic, thats rediculous, btw, FEMINISTING.COM!, so its a feminist trying to protect girls from...themselves wanting a pimp

  22. Profile photo of MORNAF1
    MORNAF1 Male 13-17
    557 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:06 pm
    it was funny, at first i was like "oh, walmart has become anti credit card?" then i read what the back said "when you have santa" and i immediately thought "so that`s why he has them sit on his lap"

    i then punched myself in the face until i beat those thoughts out of my head

  23. Profile photo of MORNAF1
    MORNAF1 Male 13-17
    557 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:07 pm
    also on that note... has anyone seen my teeth
  24. Profile photo of IkeRay
    IkeRay Male 18-29
    2704 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:12 pm
    1) how is it risque? as long as only the girls are seeing it (and maybe giggling with their friends or family about them), any panties with prints should be considered risque then seeing as the only reason for the print is to show it off.

    2) define "Juniors" department. are they talking young teens or younger, or just the adults who aren`t full size?

  25. Profile photo of IkeRay
    IkeRay Male 18-29
    2704 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:15 pm
    also, the title of the article needed to stop at panties:

    Wal-mart Yanks Pink Novelty Panties...."down?" I read it as "wal-mart employee yanks pink novelty panties" and expected down here. it would`ve made for a MUCH more interesting article.

  26. Profile photo of yen223
    yen223 Male 18-29
    342 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:41 pm
    Am i the only one who laughed at the title? So many innuendos there...
  27. Profile photo of kermitgreen
    kermitgreen Female 30-39
    187 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:57 pm
    whore knickers, how cute.
  28. Profile photo of dragonshadoz
    dragonshadoz Female 18-29
    4031 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 8:58 pm
    I think those women took that way out of context.
    "`There`s nothing quite like telling adolescent girls that they don`t need to worry about finances since they have their very own moneypot between their legs.`" Where the f-ck is that implied on the undergarments? Or is that just what YOU thought when you saw it? If so, I think you have bigger problems...
  29. Profile photo of earthshone
    earthshone Male 18-29
    1688 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 9:54 pm
    I dont understand why anything is written on panties...unless perhapse its for adults.
  30. Profile photo of bulbasaur
    bulbasaur Female 18-29
    168 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 9:55 pm
    They wouldn`t have made such a stink over this if the text was printed on a t-shirt, so why fuss over some panties? People these days are so quick to be offended anymore...
  31. Profile photo of DHise
    DHise Male 13-17
    868 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 10:18 pm
    Adults and their dirty minds.
  32. Profile photo of Harkannin
    Harkannin Male 18-29
    175 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 10:23 pm
    "There`s nothing quite like telling adolescent girls that they don`t need to worry about finances since they have their very own moneypot between their legs" -Jessica Valenti
    Oh that`s golden.
  33. Profile photo of UndKeineEier
    UndKeineEier Male 18-29
    89 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 10:29 pm
    Good thing I got myself a pair before they were pulled...
  34. Profile photo of fleafly
    fleafly Male 18-29
    268 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 10:50 pm
    I agree, this crap shouldn`t be in stores being marketed to little girls. WTF?
  35. Profile photo of wcclark
    wcclark Male 18-29
    731 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 11:32 pm
    People amuse me...

    and sadden me a bit inside.

  36. Profile photo of demonclown
    demonclown Male 18-29
    435 posts
    December 26, 2008 at 11:43 pm
    I`d Where Them
  37. Profile photo of blumoehr4
    blumoehr4 Male 18-29
    17 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 3:04 am
    if panties are risque then i finally have a good argument for my gf to stop wearing them... :D , so yay walmart
  38. Profile photo of Deepeyes
    Deepeyes Male 18-29
    151 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 4:39 am
    Hmmm in the junior departments.... well yeah.. but the whole thing is just misplaced in the first place. Who needs credit cards... if you have Santa. A dumb saying, but whatever... parents will flip their lids about anything..
  39. Profile photo of trailleadr
    trailleadr Male 40-49
    715 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 5:42 am
    I think maybe some people are just reading into it entirely too much. Not surprising though.
  40. Profile photo of LillianDulci
    LillianDulci Female 18-29
    2674 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 8:41 am
    The juniors department isn`t even for little kids, or at least here it isn`t o_o Juniors is basically for teenagers and any adult that can`t fit in the clothes in the adult section very well. I`m almost 18 and I still shop in the juniors section for everything including underwear :P
  41. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 8:55 am
    "...because the LOGICAL thing to assume is that, y`know, girls shouldn`t worry about financial issues since they have a cooter and will someday have a sugar daddy (or a pimp) who goes by "Santa""

    I knew a pimp named santa

    "Just leave out the word Rack and this could be the best name for a link in I-A-B history."
    AGREED!

  42. Profile photo of Overmann
    Overmann Male 18-29
    2600 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 9:09 am
    I think the lot of them are disillusioned. In our society today it`s not quite as easy to isolate a single article of clothing and ban it for the message it seems to convey to children. Something is fundamentally *wrong* here, and it`s only going to get worse and worse as each generation deteriorates in priorities and fashion and values. Want to hit female objectification and promiscuity where it hurts? Target music, not a single pair of pink novelty panties.
  43. Profile photo of deaf_woman
    deaf_woman Male 30-39
    2720 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 9:21 am
    i`d bake them in a cake and eat them on your birthday.
  44. Profile photo of Neagle
    Neagle Male 30-39
    1405 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 9:45 am
    Wal-Mart and bad taste, who knew!
  45. Profile photo of Quackor
    Quackor Male 18-29
    2856 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 10:20 am
    but thats the truth isnt it?? dont ban the truth damn feminists!
  46. Profile photo of musicbuff530
    musicbuff530 Female 18-29
    69 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 11:48 am
    haha thats classic
  47. Profile photo of asjomaha
    asjomaha Female 30-39
    153 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 12:14 pm
    As a parent I would definitely skip buying these for my kid. Forget the whole feminist argument, it`s tacky and it teaches a bad message.This pretty much hits in the face of good taste. I don`t worry so much that it gets worse with every generation, just that I want to teach my kid that she has value in all of her so I am trying to help her be the "whole package" - that she is a pretty girl with brains and can kick someone`s butt if she has to :-) with Tae Kwan Do lessons and sports. I am not so sure anyone has ever watched the musical Gigi where her family brought her up to appraise the value of what men can offer her in money but taught her nothing of the magic and joy of love and tenderness. What I try to instill in her is the fact she is smart, beautiful and capable of living in this world on her terms - and doesn`t have to trade her intangibles for something that won`t add to her happiness.
  48. Profile photo of Poreka
    Poreka Female 13-17
    710 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 1:43 pm
    ...okay wtf.
  49. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 2:01 pm
    "Jessica Valenti, the executive editor of Feministing.com, wrote on the panty blog post."

    Feministing..? HAHAHA.

    I think if these panties were hurting Wal*Mart`s business, then yeah they should`ve been removed. They have a reputation to keep as a business.

  50. Profile photo of HOLYCRAP1234
    HOLYCRAP1234 Male 13-17
    1468 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 2:29 pm
    I don`t understand why panties have text on them. A t-shirt would make sense, but panties?! What the hell? And feministing.com xDDDD
  51. Profile photo of HOLYCRAP1234
    HOLYCRAP1234 Male 13-17
    1468 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 2:32 pm
    Asjo, Tae kwon do lessons don`t really help much. Try having her learn Muay Thai or something.
  52. Profile photo of missaquafina
    missaquafina Female 18-29
    208 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 4:39 pm
    Reminds me of this http://money.cnn.com/2002/05/22/news/com...

    And most of the people who shop in the juniors section are 13-17 year old young women. They should have really put that in the adult section. But I am quite suprised that wal mart whould have something like that

  53. Profile photo of Kleio
    Kleio Female 13-17
    58 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 4:40 pm
    I have to agree with HOLYCRAP1234 on this one; why put text on panties in the first place?
  54. Profile photo of yoimmylene
    yoimmylene Female 13-17
    2065 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 4:43 pm
    Why TF would you put words on panties anyways?
  55. Profile photo of danthew
    danthew Male 18-29
    2122 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 5:10 pm
    I would say that they encourage child prostitution but by the time sum1s got down to the panties its a bit late...
  56. Profile photo of domisgood
    domisgood Male 18-29
    4868 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 5:42 pm
    moneypot between her legs!!!

    lucky bitch

  57. Profile photo of Ani187
    Ani187 Female 30-39
    4448 posts
    December 27, 2008 at 6:06 pm
    I do think these are inappropriate for children, but the juniors department is so middle of the road. I mean, *I* shop in the juniors department, clothing from the woman`s department just doesn`t fit me, so I could very well see myself buying these, I mean they are cute. Though they are from Wal-Mart and everyone knows Wal-Mart is the den of Satan.
  58. Profile photo of firefliet
    firefliet Female 18-29
    1232 posts
    December 28, 2008 at 10:54 am
    For kids? Yeah, that`s kind of inappropriate. >.>

    I never really cared about novelty undies anyway. Who`s going to see them? >.>

  59. Profile photo of SPARTAKITTY
    SPARTAKITTY Female 18-29
    2120 posts
    December 28, 2008 at 11:06 am
    Hah, "Den of Satan", classic.
  60. Profile photo of pmarren
    pmarren Male 40-49
    4575 posts
    December 29, 2008 at 11:59 am
    Way to stay classy Wal-Mart.

    I swear, that store has the biggest collection of moronic management dickheads the world has ever seen.

  61. Profile photo of Realbman
    Realbman Male 13-17
    342 posts
    December 29, 2008 at 4:04 pm
    Bet Mann Coulter had something to do with this :P she just wishs she had a money pot between her legs.
    Own`d foxnews
  62. Profile photo of harliekal
    harliekal Female 18-29
    2 posts
    December 31, 2008 at 3:01 pm
    So, I could understand if the underwear just had the credit card statement on them...but there were more words to it on the back. The woman herself said she didn`t even look on the backside. Am I one of the only chicks here that thinks that it is kinda...stupid? I don`t know...two things confuse me: 1. Feminists and 2. PETA.

Leave a Reply