The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 39    Average: 4/5]
89 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 9769
Rating: 4
Category: Science
Date: 12/09/08 12:01 PM

89 Responses to Introducing The Multiple Kill Vehicle

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18931 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 11:21 am
    Link: Introducing The Multiple Kill Vehicle - Lockheed Martin`s MKV is designed to hover, track and blast its target.
  2. Profile photo of shakethebox
    shakethebox Male 18-29
    339 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:11 pm
    its liek a rocket
  3. Profile photo of milkymoo
    milkymoo Male 13-17
    43 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:14 pm
    holy jesus F**K face
    that is crazy
  4. Profile photo of pick_me
    pick_me Male 18-29
    544 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:15 pm
    hmm i thing a grenade will do just about the same
  5. Profile photo of danthew
    danthew Male 18-29
    2122 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:16 pm
    cool! Thats some good computing on that thing to keep it steady and track like that. I think the four angled blasts are stabilising jets and the gun is on the front, seen on the last test.

    It would be cooler if it goes back into its starting hole to recharge the rocket.

  6. Profile photo of AnwarNova
    AnwarNova Male 18-29
    2076 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:24 pm
    wtf...I do not trust the military with this.
  7. Profile photo of duffytoler
    duffytoler Male 40-49
    5195 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:37 pm
    Looks computer-generated.
  8. Profile photo of TheSharpest
    TheSharpest Male 18-29
    1767 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:45 pm
    It doesn`t seem to be aiming, just shooting everywhere like crazy. As cool as it may be, it`s kinda useless. A frag grenade is kinda more efficient, dontcha think?
  9. Profile photo of ne028
    ne028 Male 18-29
    889 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 12:58 pm
    this was just Bumble Ball`s sad attempt to keep up with the GTA 4 generation of kids..
  10. Profile photo of Dakkar
    Dakkar Male 18-29
    1256 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:03 pm
    Not really sharpest, this thing can provide sustained covering and suppressive fire. Not only that but it can kill with that fire too.

    I imagine it would make urban warfare a bit safer. Around corners and in buildings, this thing could be a godsend.

  11. Profile photo of reDonkulous
    reDonkulous Male 18-29
    210 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:04 pm
    hmmmmm interesting. is it legal to use in a paintball match?
  12. Profile photo of danagamer
    danagamer Male 30-39
    701 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:18 pm
    What does it do? Annoy the enemy to death?
  13. Profile photo of TheSharpest
    TheSharpest Male 18-29
    1767 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:20 pm
    Dakkar: this thing can hover for 20 seconds, which means it`s useful just once. Kinda like a grenade, the MKV will kill anything in a radius in a short amount of time. I realize it`s just a prototype, but still. And I insist throwing a frag grenade inside a building achieves the same thing, at a much lower cost. I`m no specialist, but I`m thinking it won`t be a long time before this things are actually useful. They need to improve the hover time, else it`s just as useful as a grenade.
  14. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:21 pm
    ummmmmm,i must ask,why do you need a robot that can hover?theres a remote-controlled robot with tracks called SWORDS that can be equiped with a machine gun,gernade launcher,and rocket pods.by the way,this is testing its ability to hover,NOT its aiming ability.it didnt say they were testing its weapon capabilatey.oh,another robot that was built by a couple of guys in a large garage is the ripsaw.the milatary watched a test run of it,boy,they were impressed!it was fast and it could be armed with a machine gun.the two guys even threw a board into the tracks and started it.the board hit the sprocket where the tracks connectid to the ripsaw.the board was ripped in half.
  15. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:28 pm
    also,those were rockets,not guns.they dont sound like guns.also,this is kinda usless idea.enemy troops would surley hear it at how much noise it makes.they could wait behind a corner and pop out and shoot it.it needs to be quiter.it looks hard for it to aim at how much the darned thing rattles around.i would recomend rotors.and for anybody with complaints about that,they could put duckts around the rotors.
  16. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:32 pm
    danthew:its impossible to recharge a rocket.if it uses solid fuel it would be impossible without changing the rocket itself.if it uses liquid fuel it would have to connect itself to a tank of fuel.i dont see anyway they could do that.
  17. Profile photo of godoffej
    godoffej Male 18-29
    18 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:39 pm
    I work for Lockheed. This is not designed to be used against infantry, it`s intended to destroy missiles. It`s an intelligent countermeasure.
  18. Profile photo of emzrok
    emzrok Female 13-17
    1306 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:56 pm
    this seems safe and definitely not playing dirty...no morals for america, it seems >_<
  19. Profile photo of Courtney158
    Courtney158 Female 13-17
    125 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:57 pm
    I want one.
  20. Profile photo of emzrok
    emzrok Female 13-17
    1306 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 1:58 pm
    "its liek a rocket"

    your logic shakes the very ground i stand on.

  21. Profile photo of YuliasAcups
    YuliasAcups Female 18-29
    69 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:00 pm
    why? Some of the people who will be killed by that aren`t even born yet. Humans suck.


    in a video game that might kick ass though. Its the Purpose`s scale that freaks me.

  22. Profile photo of RickyGTO
    RickyGTO Male 18-29
    289 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:04 pm
    Wow seriously... I could hear that thing a mile away. Which will give me a chance to blast that phuker away from me.
  23. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:04 pm
    i never knew that,godoffej.i think the reason it looks so usless is because its in the VERY early stages of testing.but...seriosley,i would recomend just using a darned missle.theres already a rocket system that can take out missles.
  24. Profile photo of WhenIsLunch
    WhenIsLunch Male 18-29
    460 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:24 pm
    umm ya it looks like a rlly cool firework at this stage
  25. Profile photo of Quackor
    Quackor Male 18-29
    2856 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:25 pm
    that looks like the most useless weapon ever
  26. Profile photo of parkm
    parkm Male 13-17
    742 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:26 pm
    that didn`t look really friggin fake to anyone else?
    well,maybe not fake, but like it was computer generated
  27. Profile photo of quaintness
    quaintness Male 13-17
    1086 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:41 pm
    don`t most of these things get their funding cut off like half way through the program?
  28. Profile photo of ak4775
    ak4775 Male 30-39
    354 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:45 pm
    The next phase will be the Terminator aircraft. Here comes Cyberdyne.
  29. Profile photo of Blacksun1212
    Blacksun1212 Male 13-17
    266 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:49 pm
    That just seems like a waste of ammo, just hide benid a rock. And i don`t see how anyone would be stupid enough to stand rite underneath it...
  30. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 2:59 pm
    look at godoffej`s comment,this will be going against missles,not infantry.i dont know how it will kill the missle,but lockheed is probably the best war-time aircraft manufacuer,there commercial airplane desighn number is small,but they built my favorite fighter of WWII,the P-38 lightning.im expecting they will find a way to destroy the missle.
  31. Profile photo of Robert_D
    Robert_D Male 18-29
    589 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 3:11 pm
    Wow, this is why accurate descriptions are important. This is a kill vehicle, the Multiple Kill Vehicle is a booster rocket that caries 8-20 of these smaller kill vehicles. They are meant to maneuver and collide with incoming missiles.

    They are not designed to hover long-term, they do not have weapons, and they cannot "track" on their own as everything I`ve read suggests tracking will be done on the carrier vehicle which will direct these smaller kill vehicles.

  32. Profile photo of Victory7
    Victory7 Male 18-29
    362 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 3:18 pm
    That is the scariest motherdrating munition I have ever seen.
  33. Profile photo of SwissNipsUK
    SwissNipsUK Male 18-29
    763 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 3:58 pm
    Hmmm , although it`s used for missiles , my tank could still take it on :-p
  34. Profile photo of Pindragon
    Pindragon Male 18-29
    600 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 4:25 pm
    Don`t worry, Victory 7. There is no way it could hold enough fuel to make it practical for use!! *nods*
  35. Profile photo of Pindragon
    Pindragon Male 18-29
    600 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 4:26 pm
    If Robert D is correct, then it is practical. If it works, it gets blown out of the f ucking sky!
  36. Profile photo of BirdOfHermes
    BirdOfHermes Male 13-17
    294 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 4:49 pm
    this is cool. imagine having a bunch of small ones and sending them into an occupied building.
  37. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 4:54 pm
    WTF DID I JUST SEE!?!??
  38. Profile photo of Negative_One
    Negative_One Male 30-39
    2583 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:13 pm
    If this is real it`s F.UCKING AWESOME. do want.
  39. Profile photo of boredfjord
    boredfjord Male 13-17
    928 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:13 pm
    Damn, we just get better and better at killing each other.
  40. Profile photo of idontknow951
    idontknow951 Male 18-29
    908 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:22 pm
    Whatever happened to just getting a bunch of guys together and fighting with in an open field with swords? War is so gay nowadays.
  41. Profile photo of mrpopenfresh
    mrpopenfresh Male 18-29
    1036 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:28 pm
    Hey, thats great. Screw finding a way to stop world hunger, let`s just kill more people.

    And FYI to the guy under me, wars used to be fought with two rows of people facing each others with muskets. Each guy had the capacity to shoot maybe once every 3 minutes, and the accuracy was horrible. It was almost up to chance who won.

  42. Profile photo of Sjd-Wth
    Sjd-Wth Male 13-17
    60 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:34 pm
    Is it shooting or just hovering?

    Like WTF tell us whats happening plz

  43. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:51 pm
    "And FYI to the guy under me, wars used to be fought with two rows of people facing each others with muskets. Each guy had the capacity to shoot maybe once every 3 minutes, and the accuracy was horrible. It was almost up to chance who won."

    that might be true, but they were also fought between trained armies separate from civilians. there used to be rules of war that were upheld. and anyway that`s not true, there was complex strategy involved and only brilliant men were able to lead their armies to victory. war is war but modern war has reverted to barbarism.

  44. Profile photo of Negative_One
    Negative_One Male 30-39
    2583 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 5:55 pm
    Anyways, we need to put this into mass production and let them loose in California, Canada, all of South America, the Middle East, and so on.
  45. Profile photo of xiquiripat
    xiquiripat Male 18-29
    2422 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 6:00 pm
    @mrpopenfresh. Kill enough people and the problem gets solved.
  46. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 6:01 pm
    war has lost all of its honor because we`ve been convinced that it has none.
  47. Profile photo of caboose117
    caboose117 Male 13-17
    1204 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 6:28 pm
    "And FYI to the guy under me, wars used to be fought with two rows of people facing each others with muskets. Each guy had the capacity to shoot maybe once every 3 minutes, and the accuracy was horrible. It was almost up to chance who won."

    Actually, if you learned your history, because of this, war was almost entirely based upon strategy, positioning, maneuvering, and training of the soldiers. Reduced accuracy does not mean increased luck, it means decreased casualties. Although war was horribly "inefficient", it caused minimal damage, killed minimal people, and the best strategist usually won in the end. An idealistic war in my eyes.

  48. Profile photo of caboose117
    caboose117 Male 13-17
    1204 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 6:40 pm
    "that might be true, but they were also fought between trained armies separate from civilians. there used to be rules of war that were upheld. and anyway that`s not true, there was complex strategy involved and only brilliant men were able to lead their armies to victory. war is war but modern war has reverted to barbarism."

    Amen to that. It`s all because of guerrilla warfare. Reduces good men to savages, but now that we think about it, the US wouldn`t have existed without it.

  49. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 6:58 pm
    "Amen to that. It`s all because of guerrilla warfare. Reduces good men to savages, but now that we think about it, the US wouldn`t have existed without it."

    makes you think doesn`t it

  50. Profile photo of idontknow951
    idontknow951 Male 18-29
    908 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 6:59 pm
    "And FYI to the guy under me, wars used to be fought with two rows of people facing each others with muskets. Each guy had the capacity to shoot maybe once every 3 minutes, and the accuracy was horrible. It was almost up to chance who won."

    First Crusade, Second Crusade, etc. along that timeline BEFORE the industrial revolution.

  51. Profile photo of 11Volcom11
    11Volcom11 Male 18-29
    503 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:01 pm
    "Anyways, we need to put this into mass production and let them loose in California, Canada, all of South America, the Middle East, and so on. "

    are you sick? your half right, we need to mass produce them and get them to target idiots like you.

  52. Profile photo of LTimeLurker
    LTimeLurker Female 18-29
    723 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:01 pm
    This video appears to be a digital...

    Is this merely a concept?

  53. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:07 pm
    to clarify my point, i`m not blatantly bashing america, just questioning the illusion of the united states as some kind of divine nation. we`re as low as any other, but we do have one hell of a constitution.
  54. Profile photo of skipidydooda
    skipidydooda Male 13-17
    178 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:27 pm
    i would totally substitute that for a car
  55. Profile photo of osirisascend
    osirisascend Male 40-49
    3045 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:33 pm
    Civilians need to look at this demo and understand that this is the type of technology that could quite possibly end up being used against THEM.
  56. Profile photo of idontknow951
    idontknow951 Male 18-29
    908 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:37 pm
    `Civilians need to look at this demo and understand that this is the type of technology that could quite possibly end up being used against THEM."

    Doesn`t matter. A single roostertail can blow the crap outta it.

  57. Profile photo of harrydick
    harrydick Male 18-29
    332 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 7:58 pm
    "Civilians need to look at this demo and understand that this is the type of technology that could quite possibly end up being used against THEM."

    ========================

    What the hell is that supposed to mean?

  58. Profile photo of Cmstamega
    Cmstamega Male 13-17
    130 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 8:27 pm
    "AND THE BEST PART IS, IT`S WHISPER QUIET!!"
  59. Profile photo of RyanF701
    RyanF701 Male 18-29
    2486 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 9:05 pm
    "
    Whatever happened to just getting a bunch of guys together and fighting with in an open field with swords? War is so gay nowadays."

    Real life isn`t an anime or an MMO buddy.

  60. Profile photo of Boredered
    Boredered Male 18-29
    2506 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 9:11 pm
    MOTHER FRIGNADE! that was insane, prety sucky how they hav to deploy is and how it flies for like 5 seconds, i guess thats y its a prototype, and to


    "Civilians need to look at this demo and understand that this is the type of technology that could quite possibly end up being used against THEM."

    Especially with obama... GROW THE HECK UP! u probably believe in 2012

  61. Profile photo of SilverThread
    SilverThread Male 30-39
    3431 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 9:46 pm
    It`s called the Miniature Kill Vehicle actually and it`s launching a number of small vehicles designed to intercept ballistic Missiles.
  62. Profile photo of jaketb14
    jaketb14 Male 18-29
    51 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 10:07 pm
    come on guys, i thought IAB was smarter than this. It`s not shooting anything, its using the "Parasorber" concepts. The "muzzle flashes" you`re seeing are actually pulse thrusters being fired, like if you ever played that old lunar lander game

    all it does is keep the vehicle stable/move it in a predesignate direction. Unfortunately, this process is not fuel efficient, and that would explain its short flight time.

  63. Profile photo of 11Volcom11
    11Volcom11 Male 18-29
    503 posts
    December 9, 2008 at 11:13 pm
    "Civilians need to look at this demo and understand that this is the type of technology that could quite possibly end up being used against THEM."

    osirisascend has a point, im not sure why people are bashing him. this has riot control and more written all over it. and some guys said "Especially with obama... GROW THE HECK UP! u probably believe in 2012" to his comment. the 2012 thing aside, this is exactly what the american goverment wants. i know i will get alot of hate for saying this, but the american goverment wants its people to not think about what the goverment is doing. they want a president who can tell you anything and you will agree. a coincidence that after the worste eight years you americans have seen curtesy of george bush, that a black president comes along is and your saviour!(who also has hitler qualities in his motivational speeches). think about all sides of something is all im saying.

  64. Profile photo of PreoSmo
    PreoSmo Female 18-29
    472 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 12:21 am
    11volcom11: `...that a black president comes along is and your saviour!(who also has hitler qualities in his motivational speeches). think about all sides of something is all im saying.`

    That phrase is more right than you know. Obama says he wants to start an army made up entirely of civilians, with equal control to the military, but answering directly to Obama. Hitleresque indeed.

  65. Profile photo of PreoSmo
    PreoSmo Female 18-29
    472 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 12:22 am
    And if that scary thing is real, do scientists not watch Battlestar Galactica?
  66. Profile photo of Grizzzzzzzzz
    Grizzzzzzzzz Male 18-29
    489 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 1:49 am
    ...

    >_>

    it looks like a companion cube.

  67. Profile photo of alfietoon
    alfietoon Male 18-29
    1164 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 2:43 am
    why wud u need that?
  68. Profile photo of Devi3000
    Devi3000 Female 18-29
    1497 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 3:39 am
    Well if that ain`t scary as all hell.
  69. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 6:23 am
    "war has lost all of its honor because we`ve been convinced that it has none."

    Wars never had honor thats just a method of convincing people to kill each other which goes against everything honorable.

  70. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 6:49 am
    Some of my favorite quotes regarding war
    "War. War never changes."- an awsome game
    "Only a fool or a fraud talks tough or romantically about war." - John McCain
    "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."-Albert Einstein
  71. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 6:54 am
    "Wars never had honor thats just a method of convincing people to kill each other which goes against everything honorable."

    what about when a country is defending itself? should a country just let another country invade because war is dishonorable? there is honor in a just war. but we have been convinced there is no honor in any war so we end up entering unjust wars and fighting using barbaric guerrilla techniques. if you think our military techniques haven`t fallen since the days of napoleon then you are mistaken.

  72. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 6:57 am
    when i say we i mean it as a global society because it seems like war has degraded everywhere.

    and also "...military ethics* haven`t..."

  73. Profile photo of vonKaiser
    vonKaiser Male 18-29
    108 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 7:04 am
    It doesn`t show anything bad, but that little thing just scares the crap out of me.
  74. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 7:42 am
    wow,can everybody just SHUT UP to there opinions of war?this wont KILL people,itll save them by destroying incoming missles.maybe nukes,if we ever get to that stage.and yes,people did fight with muskets in rows.heres what there strategy was,a guy would stand there,probably there commander,and say,"fire!",and then there row of guys would shoot at once,but then they found it was more efective for soldiers to shoot idependitley,like today.and once again,lockheed has found an awsome,and very effective,way to destroy things.
  75. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 7:47 am
    "heres what there strategy was,a guy would stand there,probably there commander,and say,"fire!",and then there row of guys would shoot at once."

    completely not true, the strategy was from where you positioned your troops and when you chose for them to advance or retreat or charge. if a good enough strategic move was made the other army`s commander would concede defeat in order to save lives.

  76. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 8:00 am
    There`s still strategy probably even more now.

    "fighting using barbaric guerrilla techniques"
    I`ve never seen fighting without barbaric techniques putting a sword/musket ball/bullet through someones skull is never civilized.

  77. Profile photo of McGovern1981
    McGovern1981 Male 30-39
    14268 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 8:06 am
    "what about when a country is defending itself? should a country just let another country invade because war is dishonorable? there is honor in a just war"

    Sometime yes people have to defend themselves but there is no honor in killing.

  78. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 8:09 am
    "There`s still strategy probably even more now."

    the strategy was what i was calling barbaric, not the means by which they kill each other.

    "Sometime yes people have to defend themselves but there is no honor in killing."

    war is not just killing, there is diplomacy, there is strategy, and hopefully, there is a victory in the name of something just.

  79. Profile photo of amaqdrinker
    amaqdrinker Male 18-29
    2245 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 8:11 am
    how i see it there are two sides to morality, there is love and there is justice. if war could be fought perfectly it would be the epitome of justice.
  80. Profile photo of Eichenkatze
    Eichenkatze Male 18-29
    780 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 10:21 am
    There are still rules to war, these rules haven`t changed from the civil war to World War 2, and even to modern day war. The only thing that has changed is the name fighting, and the technology that name is using.
    The only reason you hear more about violent things in war now as compared to WW2 recordings/footage/newscasts, civil war, and so on is because of the media. With our world being so connected, it only takes minutes for brutual footage to reach the world.. where as in WW2 it took weeks to months.. some times never even leaving the battlefield.


    War is the same. Humans are the same.

    When it comes to War and killing ourselves, we are experts. We are savage. We are destructive.
    Out of all the skills man has, War/killing has always been the top and it always will be. It`s just who we are.
    Stop asking for a war-less world of pure peace. It will never happen. Humans are too... animalistic.

  81. Profile photo of Lockon
    Lockon Male 18-29
    376 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 11:36 am
    There`s no honor in war anymore -_- and this just goes to prove that point even further.
  82. Profile photo of Chaos7
    Chaos7 Male 18-29
    849 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 11:37 am
    What happened? All of you are so into nuclear bombs! Abd when this weapon is introduced, you all hate weapons! WTH?
  83. Profile photo of syke22
    syke22 Male 18-29
    1136 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 12:46 pm
    i dont know what the hell yall are going on about, its a freakin hoveren thing that shoots alot of guns at once... ITS dratING AWSOME
  84. Profile photo of slipkfighter
    slipkfighter Male 13-17
    35 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 5:29 pm
    i wounld not feel safe around that monster
  85. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 6:54 pm
    STOP SAYING IT HAS ALOT OF GUNS.there pulse thrusters,squirting fuel like machine guns,but they arent guns.so read the comments before you go screaming it has alot of guns.pulse thrusters squirt little bursts of fuel,unlike other rockets that stream fuel.it makes em easier to control.AND I DONT GIVE A DRAT ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS OF WAR,SO SHUT UP ABOUT IT!
  86. Profile photo of Pilanus
    Pilanus Male 18-29
    675 posts
    December 10, 2008 at 6:58 pm
    Is this the first step towards a war in which we send only robot armies to fight another nations own robot armies? A war in which not a single life is lost? I say it is...

    But the transition phase will be pretty bloody as we have robots killing humans...

  87. Profile photo of Vagrant86
    Vagrant86 Male 18-29
    2556 posts
    December 12, 2008 at 9:28 am
    uhhh its a hover craft those are thrusters... and a pea shooter could probably make it explode.

    theres no guns on that thing.

  88. Profile photo of raikun12
    raikun12 Male 18-29
    586 posts
    December 14, 2008 at 9:04 am
    YAY! a complete waste of tax dollars in an already ailing economy! yay! go US!
  89. Profile photo of Ace2309
    Ace2309 Male 13-17
    332 posts
    December 20, 2008 at 10:43 am
    every body just shut up about it being wasteful,this is an early prototype,with no weapons,itll be going against missles,so guns would be usless,in the future,this wont look usless,im sure.

Leave a Reply