Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
theres no guns on that thing.
But the transition phase will be pretty bloody as we have robots killing humans...
War is the same. Humans are the same.
When it comes to War and killing ourselves, we are experts. We are savage. We are destructive.Out of all the skills man has, War/killing has always been the top and it always will be. It`s just who we are.Stop asking for a war-less world of pure peace. It will never happen. Humans are too... animalistic.
the strategy was what i was calling barbaric, not the means by which they kill each other.
"Sometime yes people have to defend themselves but there is no honor in killing."
war is not just killing, there is diplomacy, there is strategy, and hopefully, there is a victory in the name of something just.
Sometime yes people have to defend themselves but there is no honor in killing.
"fighting using barbaric guerrilla techniques"I`ve never seen fighting without barbaric techniques putting a sword/musket ball/bullet through someones skull is never civilized.
completely not true, the strategy was from where you positioned your troops and when you chose for them to advance or retreat or charge. if a good enough strategic move was made the other army`s commander would concede defeat in order to save lives.
and also "...military ethics* haven`t..."
what about when a country is defending itself? should a country just let another country invade because war is dishonorable? there is honor in a just war. but we have been convinced there is no honor in any war so we end up entering unjust wars and fighting using barbaric guerrilla techniques. if you think our military techniques haven`t fallen since the days of napoleon then you are mistaken.
Wars never had honor thats just a method of convincing people to kill each other which goes against everything honorable.
it looks like a companion cube.
That phrase is more right than you know. Obama says he wants to start an army made up entirely of civilians, with equal control to the military, but answering directly to Obama. Hitleresque indeed.
osirisascend has a point, im not sure why people are bashing him. this has riot control and more written all over it. and some guys said "Especially with obama... GROW THE HECK UP! u probably believe in 2012" to his comment. the 2012 thing aside, this is exactly what the american goverment wants. i know i will get alot of hate for saying this, but the american goverment wants its people to not think about what the goverment is doing. they want a president who can tell you anything and you will agree. a coincidence that after the worste eight years you americans have seen curtesy of george bush, that a black president comes along is and your saviour!(who also has hitler qualities in his motivational speeches). think about all sides of something is all im saying.
all it does is keep the vehicle stable/move it in a predesignate direction. Unfortunately, this process is not fuel efficient, and that would explain its short flight time.
"Civilians need to look at this demo and understand that this is the type of technology that could quite possibly end up being used against THEM."
Especially with obama... GROW THE HECK UP! u probably believe in 2012
Real life isn`t an anime or an MMO buddy.
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
Doesn`t matter. A single roostertail can blow the crap outta it.
Is this merely a concept?
are you sick? your half right, we need to mass produce them and get them to target idiots like you.
First Crusade, Second Crusade, etc. along that timeline BEFORE the industrial revolution.
makes you think doesn`t it
Amen to that. It`s all because of guerrilla warfare. Reduces good men to savages, but now that we think about it, the US wouldn`t have existed without it.
Actually, if you learned your history, because of this, war was almost entirely based upon strategy, positioning, maneuvering, and training of the soldiers. Reduced accuracy does not mean increased luck, it means decreased casualties. Although war was horribly "inefficient", it caused minimal damage, killed minimal people, and the best strategist usually won in the end. An idealistic war in my eyes.
that might be true, but they were also fought between trained armies separate from civilians. there used to be rules of war that were upheld. and anyway that`s not true, there was complex strategy involved and only brilliant men were able to lead their armies to victory. war is war but modern war has reverted to barbarism.
Like WTF tell us whats happening plz
And FYI to the guy under me, wars used to be fought with two rows of people facing each others with muskets. Each guy had the capacity to shoot maybe once every 3 minutes, and the accuracy was horrible. It was almost up to chance who won.
They are not designed to hover long-term, they do not have weapons, and they cannot "track" on their own as everything I`ve read suggests tracking will be done on the carrier vehicle which will direct these smaller kill vehicles.
in a video game that might kick ass though. Its the Purpose`s scale that freaks me.
your logic shakes the very ground i stand on.
I imagine it would make urban warfare a bit safer. Around corners and in buildings, this thing could be a godsend.
It would be cooler if it goes back into its starting hole to recharge the rocket.