The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 46    Average: 3.3/5]
193 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 17783
Rating: 3.3
Category:
Date: 10/09/08 11:14 PM

193 Responses to Newsweek Under Fire For Using Untouched Palin Pic

  1. Profile photo of LittleMissQT
    LittleMissQT Female 18-29
    1273 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 6:15 pm
    Link: Newsweek Under Fire For Using Untouched Palin Pic - Newsweek mag used an untouched, close-up photo of Sarah Palin for this week`s cover. Bias or Meh? Here`s the debate...
  2. Profile photo of bonzoello
    bonzoello Male 18-29
    228 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:18 pm
    unfair? to her? its how she drating looks!!!!

    drat you fox news

    drat you sarah palin

  3. Profile photo of bustamovexxx
    bustamovexxx Female 18-29
    151 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:20 pm
    oh noz!
    imperfections!!!
    now we`ll never vote for her!
  4. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:22 pm
    I think this has less to do with Palin and more to do with the unrealistic expectations of some media services. If I were Palin I`d be more upset at the woman saying that it`s an insult to have my face, as it is, on a magazine. God forbid I have pores.

    Ugh.

    I find this disgustingly unoffensive, if you will.

  5. Profile photo of bustamovexxx
    bustamovexxx Female 18-29
    151 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:22 pm
    closer look = http://www.theimproper.com/Images/Art/sa...
  6. Profile photo of bustamovexxx
    bustamovexxx Female 18-29
    151 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:23 pm
    i agree opie.
    of all the problems we`re having right now, some superficial prisses are going to whine about her wrinkles.

    they really make us look bad.

  7. Profile photo of 4x4Master
    4x4Master Male 18-29
    220 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:25 pm
    I see nothing wrong with the photo?
  8. Profile photo of rasputin3x
    rasputin3x Male 18-29
    80 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:28 pm
    doesn`t fox have anything better to do?
  9. Profile photo of unreedemed
    unreedemed Male 13-17
    544 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:29 pm
    i dont like how the chick`s freakin smiling through the whole thing
  10. Profile photo of DHise
    DHise Male 13-17
    868 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:30 pm
    As my brother said, who`s fault is that? If anything, it`s Sarah Palin`s fault for being so damn ugly! Who gives a flying freak?!
  11. Profile photo of woomanfoo
    woomanfoo Male 18-29
    534 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:32 pm
    Is it wrong that I wanted to punch the pompous biotch on the far right in the throat? That stupid smirk she kept wearing when all she could REALLY muster up to say was "It`s CLEARLY a slap in the face. The title is proof of that. The title of this is proof that this is clearly a slap in the face." Props for the lady on the left for laughing in her damn face though. Fox is scum.
  12. Profile photo of contra64
    contra64 Male 18-29
    32 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:32 pm
    `Do we know they retouched Obama`s photos?`
    ---Look at the cover, he`s all fuzzy and back lit!
    `There are other covers where-
    *** Where he looks PERFECT, Julia! PERFECT!

    (2 minutes later)

    - I should point out we don`t actually know Obama had his photos retouched.

    Wow, so then what is your point Fox? We think Palin looks normal, and in this picture Obama looks fuzzy! SCANDAL!

  13. Profile photo of gwtwgal
    gwtwgal Female 18-29
    28 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:33 pm
    Maybe Newsweek was just trying to spark Palin`s interest and get her to pick up a news magazine.
  14. Profile photo of VictoryRider
    VictoryRider Male 40-49
    1461 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:34 pm
    That newscaster is pretty.

    As far as the cover goes, who f*cking cares. It`s a picture, ffs. On the other hand, It`s 2:30 am, and I`m really tired.

  15. Profile photo of sgdp
    sgdp Female 18-29
    553 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:36 pm
    As a photographer, I can say this is extremely, extremely unprofessional. I haven`t seen the photo, but if there really are stray moustache hairs, etc., that`s clearly unprofessional of both the photographer and the magazine.
  16. Profile photo of bonzoello
    bonzoello Male 18-29
    228 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:36 pm
    upon closer look, she does seem to be touched. and by touched i mean completely friggin retarded.
  17. Profile photo of Androgynous
    Androgynous Male 18-29
    757 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:37 pm
    There goes all those nuns... D:

    The bitch says it perfectly "It highlights every imperfection that every human being has" EVERYONE HAS THEM SO THEREFORE...IT DOESN`T MATTER.

    She`s running for VP not for another motherdrating beauty pageant you dimwitted idiots.

    "It`s mortifying. It`s mortifying" Yeah, it`s so terrible she`s human...it`s SO terrible she has flaws on a cover of a magazine.

    Y`know what, I`m probably going to start a flame war for saying this...But I gotta say it:

    So many women are blinded by the fact that Palin IS in fact a WOMAN that none of them are paying ANY attention to any of her stats. I swear to you, Look at almost half of the women going "PALIN IS AMAZING"...then ask them what Palin has done that`s beneficial, and how she could benefit the US through VP`ing and possibly ((most likely since McCain`s old ass will probably DIE)) as a President?! And I will tell you now most of them will look at you blankly then go "Shes

  18. Profile photo of 11Volcom11
    11Volcom11 Male 18-29
    503 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:37 pm
    wow, this is an issue in this day and age? why is this even on the news?

    and who the hell cares what she looks like? shes running for VP not americas top model, why doesnt the media talk about her politics instead of how she looks on the magazine

  19. Profile photo of Androgynous
    Androgynous Male 18-29
    757 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:39 pm
    - A WOMAN!~"

    drat politics, and drat fox news.

  20. Profile photo of 11Volcom11
    11Volcom11 Male 18-29
    503 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:40 pm
    this also all goes back to the fact that FOX is a garbage news station, and anything they say should be taken half seriously
  21. Profile photo of BrokenJohn
    BrokenJohn Male 18-29
    464 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:42 pm
    The picture looks retouched though. Am I the only person who can see that?
  22. Profile photo of woomanfoo
    woomanfoo Male 18-29
    534 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:43 pm
    Fox is to news what orange juice is to a freshly brushed mouth. It leaves that same damn taste in my mouth.
  23. Profile photo of i-am-horny
    i-am-horny Male 13-17
    1053 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:43 pm
    ffs women and politics go so bad
  24. Profile photo of Okasen
    Okasen Female 13-17
    523 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:43 pm
    She`s not running based on looks. If that mattered at all, McCain wouldn`t have been nominated. And you know what? For an untouched picture, Palin doesn`t look half bad.
  25. Profile photo of 11Volcom11
    11Volcom11 Male 18-29
    503 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:44 pm
    and the bitch on the right of the screen has nothing to back up what she`s saying. she just keeps yelling "ITS A SLAP IN THE FACE!" FOX news should be taken off the air...
  26. Profile photo of Nidonemo
    Nidonemo Male 18-29
    9308 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:46 pm
    Stopped @1:08

    Please...people, beauty is fleeting. If you obsess with it, you`ll lose it ever faster.

    Is anyone wondering why they aren`t talking about OTHER ISSUES while they`re arguing over some stupid magazine issue that will be in a landfill next month?

    Anyone else sense a DISTRACTION going on here?

  27. Profile photo of yen223
    yen223 Male 18-29
    342 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:48 pm
    A magazine is under fire for NOT using photoshop? wtf has happened to society?
  28. Profile photo of opiebreath
    opiebreath Female 18-29
    15774 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:48 pm
    Ven, that`s actually the first thing I thought when I heard it.
  29. Profile photo of ellia
    ellia Female 18-29
    165 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:53 pm
    palin`s - [link">
    obama`s - [link">
  30. Profile photo of ellia
    ellia Female 18-29
    165 posts
    October 9, 2008 at 11:55 pm
    i personally don`t care if it`s retouched or not.

    and if i hear that woman say `slap in the face` one more time, im gonna slap her in the face.

  31. Profile photo of RickyGTO
    RickyGTO Male 18-29
    289 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:00 am
    Thanks ellia. I don`t get it? Palin`s doesn`t even look bad, wrinkles are normal even Obama has wrinkles on his cover. It shows how they really look, I myself don`t like when girls wear tons of make-up, it makes them hide how they should actually look in. Other words they look FAKE if they take out all the NORMAL wrinkles.
  32. Profile photo of Agentk120
    Agentk120 Male 18-29
    510 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:01 am
    drat drat drat. (It`s all I can think when society pisses me off this much. We NEED to photoshop people? What the drat?!)
  33. Profile photo of michaelcsr
    michaelcsr Male 40-49
    559 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:02 am
    It`s FOX news. (Term news used loosly) It`s not even real news. If a democrat blinks wrong, the dumbasses on FOX lose their freakin minds.
  34. Profile photo of Androgynous
    Androgynous Male 18-29
    757 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:03 am
    Thanks, Ellia.
    I honestly don`t see how this is a "slap in the face".
    *rubs temples*
    If anything I don`t even think it looks half bad.
    The hooker on the right made it sound like they drew a mustache on her then took a poo on the cover...then copied it and sent it to everyone.
  35. Profile photo of peloos12
    peloos12 Male 18-29
    3822 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:05 am
    Now that I finally seen it up close (thanks ellia)...boo freakin hoo.

    I don`t see anything I wouldn`t expect to see on the face of a woman her age.

  36. Profile photo of AnwarNova
    AnwarNova Male 18-29
    2076 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:06 am
    Bias in the media? Sure!
    I mean, just look at Fox for example.

    I think the core issue I`d like to get back too though, is how both parties suck.

  37. Profile photo of 2472192
    2472192 Male 13-17
    121 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:10 am
    WHO GIVES A FRICKEN CHEESE!!!!!!!......lets just get on with the dam elections...and clearly they are gettin mad over notthing.....
  38. Profile photo of langdonhill
    langdonhill Male 18-29
    506 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:12 am
    michaelcsr: and if a republican winks wrong, democrats do what...?
  39. Profile photo of peloos12
    peloos12 Male 18-29
    3822 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:15 am
    And look who`s complaining about it:

    3 woman television personalities. Their lives revolve looking pretty for the camera. I doubt there`s anything on the face of the planet with a penis who gives a poo about this. Likewise, if McCain had selected a man as his VP and this happens it`s a non issue.

  40. Profile photo of woomanfoo
    woomanfoo Male 18-29
    534 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:18 am
    "michaelcsr: and if a republican winks wrong, democrats do what...?"

    That`s a ridiculous question. We democrats have no double standards....

  41. Profile photo of hoobaga
    hoobaga Male 18-29
    123 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:20 am
    The woman at fox said "normal flaws in a human being"

    IF ITS NORMAL, WHY RETOUCH IT?
    its not the like results of the election is based on facial hairs or wrinkles that might SWAY the publics` opinions.

    Its not like a republican would be a democrat because Palin doesn`t have a perfect face.

  42. Profile photo of LoofahBoy
    LoofahBoy Male 18-29
    3301 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:28 am
    Good God, who cares!?
  43. Profile photo of Groogle
    Groogle Male 30-39
    2172 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:36 am
    So politics is all about looks now... interesting.

    And she`s just a running to be vice president. Does that really matter?

    No, it does not.

  44. Profile photo of dwi_dwi
    dwi_dwi Female 18-29
    269 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:37 am
    as much as i dislike her political ideas, she is a beautiful woman, and the picture looks fine.
  45. Profile photo of Mweebles
    Mweebles Female 18-29
    1653 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:40 am
    Geez. The chick on the right was getting way too in to it.
  46. Profile photo of AlexTron
    AlexTron Male 18-29
    534 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:48 am
    The woman on the right was waaaaaaaay too overreactive.

    I`m not a fan of Palin, but wow, that woman took this waaaay too far.

  47. Profile photo of rdco49
    rdco49 Female 18-29
    101 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:50 am
    -Palin`s cover: I see wrinkles, freckles, pores, foundation/powder, and yes... a little bit of what appears to be facial hair. You know what? She still looks really pretty (and I`m a hardcore dem, who hardly sees any redeeming qualities in her.)
    -Obama`s pic: If you ignore the halo lighting, I see pores, wrinkles, freckles, bumps, and stubble.

    Oh wow...I didn`t human beings in their 40s were expected to be the epitome of perfection.. guess I`ll be screwed.

  48. Profile photo of Hermanoid
    Hermanoid Male 30-39
    43 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:50 am
    For drat`s christ. These are the same "women" who bitch and whine about how Playboy pics are so touched-up that they`re "unnatural." Boo dratING hoo. So now they DEMAND touching up of photos, simply because there`s a woman involved? And just to weigh in, Sarah Palin is not attractive at all, no matter how close the camera gets. She looks like a mule and sounds like an idiot. "Well for gosh darnit heck..."
  49. Profile photo of Hermanoid
    Hermanoid Male 30-39
    43 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:51 am
    I never said "drat."
  50. Profile photo of Hermanoid
    Hermanoid Male 30-39
    43 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:54 am
    I said "for f u c k`s" christ, and "boo f u c k i n g hoo." Fascist censors.
  51. Profile photo of Hermanoid
    Hermanoid Male 30-39
    43 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:59 am
    And by the way... in case you`re wondering about why I said "women" (in quotes), I`ll tell you. It`s because only stupid little girls are so self-absorbed and so narrow-minded that all they care about is how "WOMEN" are represented. WOMEN are mature enough to not wear either their emotions or their politics on their sleeves. WOMEN are mature enough to be able to speak about what they believe without throwing a tantrum or being overly theatrical. WOMEN are a dying breed.
  52. Profile photo of Baalthazaq
    Baalthazaq Male 18-29
    4548 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:05 am
    I think alot of people here are underestimating how little it takes to change the public vote. Looks are a massive deal.

    There`s a reason only 2 or 3 times in the history of the US have you chosen the shorter candidate. Some tiny things, are a huge deal.

  53. Profile photo of s0rd3dvis1on
    s0rd3dvis1on Male 18-29
    2388 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:06 am
    yes go buy this magazine then you will know what what are talking about. markerters make me sick. Secondly though shes still hot
  54. Profile photo of nacho187
    nacho187 Male 13-17
    202 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:11 am
    my god with the economy and war we have to report on the most important thing a bad picture. I`m going to Canada. [Leaves with bag and clothes}
  55. Profile photo of s0rd3dvis1on
    s0rd3dvis1on Male 18-29
    2388 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:12 am
    soory to go on but this is not the first time i have seen this haooen on the news either (americas news). Listen to the advertising here omg you gotta see how newsweek has totally bitchslapped a potentail president in the face don`t you just want to buy it. Its f`ing rediculous how many subliminal adverrts are acctually shoved down peoples throat (subliminal because you dont expect there to be adverts on that show in the first place so youre not ready for it). O and her face looks fine its like their saying YES she really is that good looking. Rant over
  56. Profile photo of Tikitac
    Tikitac Male 18-29
    115 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:14 am
    Oh no! not an actual picture of a person!
  57. Profile photo of Apple_18
    Apple_18 Female 18-29
    475 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:26 am
    )-|
  58. Profile photo of n0n
    n0n Male 18-29
    342 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:03 am
    no! you can`t show the people the truth! they NEED to be lied to. they must not see the product as it truly is! /bill hicks style sarcasm
  59. Profile photo of n0n
    n0n Male 18-29
    342 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:06 am
    also, news anchor "trust me, even though it may look fine to you simple viewers at home who don`t have high-paying journalism jobs but, we here at fox know the truth and we assure you, it looks really bad - not that we wish to influence your oppinion in any way of course, because that would be unethical".
  60. Profile photo of LadyMorgue
    LadyMorgue Female 30-39
    1516 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:10 am
    I personally like that it is not retouched. It makes her look more real... more like a REAL woman... someone young girls and women of all ages can look up to. The media puts too much pressure on women with all the retouching and such.
  61. Profile photo of BikerTeen
    BikerTeen Male 13-17
    2113 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:36 am
    thats kinda messed up
  62. Profile photo of Thejuggalo
    Thejuggalo Male 18-29
    18 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:54 am
    OH NO! she looks like a real non-perfect person *gasp*!!! there are definitly some stupid people in this world.
  63. Profile photo of MrMarcin
    MrMarcin Male 18-29
    13 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:56 am
    Even if she looked like s.hit, which she doesn`t, George Bush wasn`t the prettiest either and he`s been in the office for eight years. The woman on our right is admitting that she is a superficial w.hore and a total b.itch.
    However, none of this changes the fact that Sarah Palin is a stupid c.unt
  64. Profile photo of pinkyxdinkyx
    pinkyxdinkyx Female 18-29
    24 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:02 am
    The only issue I guess is that they had retouched Barack Obama in his cover and not Sarah Palin...it almost seems as though they were trying to make her look bad...but I personally think she still looks just fine. I actually kind of like that they didn`t retouch it because I think some people go a little photo shop crazy sometimes...though they could of removed the slight facial hair if there was some.
  65. Profile photo of kinbushi
    kinbushi Male 18-29
    47 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:10 am
    The real issue is that Newsweek wants to make the fact that "she`s one of the folks" a problem. They clearly say that in the title. Newsweek cleverly use the untouched photo to highlight the fact that she is "one of the folks". Obama fans would be livid if a maganize were to make an untoched closeup cover of Obama.
  66. Profile photo of Dylan5121
    Dylan5121 Male 13-17
    954 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:14 am
    wow that was the most stupid report I`ve ever seen...
  67. Profile photo of KingofFreaks
    KingofFreaks Male 18-29
    123 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:19 am
    Wow, the presidential race in possibly the most powerful country is a beauty contest now? I`m staying out of the way when the swimwear section happens.
  68. Profile photo of LunarMoon
    LunarMoon Female 13-17
    217 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:34 am
    /facepalm
  69. Profile photo of davymid
    davymid Male 30-39
    12140 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:41 am
    Oh shut up.
  70. Profile photo of MissMage
    MissMage Female 18-29
    695 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:45 am
    This is stupid. I looked at it up close. She looks fine. She looks human. My problem is is how freakin nasty people are to this woman. It`s ridicuous.
  71. Profile photo of Fartacus
    Fartacus Female 50-59
    529 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:46 am
    The fact that they`re debating this at all is highly sexist. She`s forty-something, of course she has imperfections and wrinkles and pores. She`s not some supermodel who goes and gets a facial at the spa everyday and then wears tons of makeup. She`s a mom who also works outside the home.

    Faux News are a bunch of @ssholes.

  72. Profile photo of SparkleBabys
    SparkleBabys Male 18-29
    505 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:04 am
    Jesus. Thanks, faux news. I`m not a big palin supporter, but this is drating dumb. You can`t be "one of the folks," which to my understanding is Palin`s claim to fame? And then bitch about how you look like them.
    Cancel your subscription, and go back into your cave.
  73. Profile photo of MrFibbles
    MrFibbles Male 18-29
    311 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:09 am
    a bunch of women debating about someones wrinkles and pores...hmmm
  74. Profile photo of shortsagitar
    shortsagitar Female 18-29
    676 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:28 am
    omg ok i would WANT my picture to be un retouched because it would show the world that im not perfect. nor was i fake

    all those people on the cover of almost any magazine are completley photoshopped... they arent really that skinny nor are they that tan
    youve all seen the videos of the before and after for magazines..

    Just drop it

  75. Profile photo of Vikstar
    Vikstar Female 18-29
    399 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:32 am
    Baalthazag is right - it`s things like this that can make or break a politicians hopes. The magazine is just playing on the prejudices of the people. Newsweek is not slamming Palin by posting a natural picture of her, it`s the judgemental general public who do that themselves. This cover could have gone two ways in the public eye.

    It`s quite ironic that Fox has taken this slant on the story, broadcasting their own prejudices to lots of people who may not have come to that conclusion themselves. There are those who may have seen this frank photo and though `huh, I guess she`s honest and upfront, open and brave` instead of `oh yuk, I can see her pores, what a hag`.

    Way to go Fox for making up people`s minds before they had the chance to make up their own minds.

  76. Profile photo of thedobkins
    thedobkins Male 30-39
    239 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:45 am
    ha ha ha, I hate Sarah Palin anyway. Every news channel and magazine is partizan, including Fox News. Let them do whatever they want!
  77. Profile photo of Mandikins
    Mandikins Female 13-17
    147 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:13 am
    Yep, that`s a forty-year-old woman, alright.
  78. Profile photo of CrakrJak
    CrakrJak Male 40-49
    17514 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:15 am
    They make Obama look like a God, and then they go microscopic on the pores and small hairs on Palin`s face. This was insulting, and childish of Newsweek.

    Goes to reaffirm that Newsweek is not about News, Its about spinning politics to the left and giving liberals their talking points 52 times a year.

    Sickening.

  79. Profile photo of TKD_Master
    TKD_Master Male 18-29
    4794 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:19 am
    hey, you know what that /facepalm thing just reminded me of? when opie used to *headdesk *headdesk...i miss those =/
    /ontopic
    so? its a pic of her...a normal pic. who cares?
  80. Profile photo of madest
    madest Male 40-49
    7378 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:33 am
    Is there a more flawed person than Trig Palins mommy?
  81. Profile photo of jdm1979
    jdm1979 Female 30-39
    30 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:06 am
    i apologize in advance, but i GOT to say it: this is a typical american debate. noone would really care here in germany.
  82. Profile photo of starrstreet
    starrstreet Female 18-29
    401 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:27 am
    Wow... is this a joke? These women need to STFU.
  83. Profile photo of aust4beer
    aust4beer Male 30-39
    196 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:33 am
    Nothing like Fox News complaining about everything the can because the Republicans are getting there butt kicked. She isn`t that hot and she doesn`t know what she is talking about. If you can`t keep your 17 year old from getting pregant, you probably can`t handle the VP position. She actually thinks she will see Jesus in her lifetime. Maybe more prayer will clear up her facial hair and black heads. Tina Fey is much hotter and shouldn`t lower herself to this.
  84. Profile photo of 1williamsg
    1williamsg Male 18-29
    326 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:34 am
    omg they used a real picture of someone
    now the whole worlds going to implode and we are all going to die
    this is the most redicules thing i have ever heard of
  85. Profile photo of mylostdog
    mylostdog Female 18-29
    471 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:34 am
    who looked at that cover and thought that it deserved a segment on the news because palin didn`t look flawless?

    we`re on the verge of a recession and people are directing their attention to some woman`s peach fuzz?

    everyday i get more and more ashamed of my country..

  86. Profile photo of Cashcleaner
    Cashcleaner Male 18-29
    319 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:34 am
    Brought to you by the committee to distract you from real issues.
  87. Profile photo of starrstreet
    starrstreet Female 18-29
    401 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:49 am
    Why isn`t anyone looking at this photo as a REAL picture of this woman who says she is one of us.

    Having to retouch it as little as possible and she still looks this beautiful is amazing. Also, this photo WAS retouched slightly. If they did it so much to the point where you didn`t see pours it would look so fake since it is such a close up shot.

    Fox easily could`ve just said how amazing this was to show this women in real light and how beautiful she still looked. But they love to demonize the liberal media!

  88. Profile photo of AndroidMetro
    AndroidMetro Male 18-29
    807 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:51 am
    No news?

    No problem! (says Fox)

  89. Profile photo of Deepeyes
    Deepeyes Male 18-29
    151 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:11 am
    hmmm what about coverage of the economy from Fox???? Hmmm???? What about Iraq? This is a diversion.
  90. Profile photo of newlife
    newlife Male 40-49
    254 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:25 am
    yes...blemishes....BUT SHE STILL LOOKS WONDERFULLY GREAT....a lot better looking than obama "touched up" ANYDAY!...she shouldn`t be ashamed of her flaws...she wears it beautifully!!!!
  91. Profile photo of freddyferret
    freddyferret Male 40-49
    11741 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:25 am
    Oh ........ my ......... GOD!

    She`s human? She`s not perfect? She HAS FLAWS??? THOSE BASTARDS!!!! How dare they not completely retouch the picture and make her look hotter than a supermodel! She should sue them and have the FBI and IRS take them down. Every employee of Newsweek should be destroyed and locked up forever!

    Good grief this is just more proof that Fox sucks. This isn`t news, this is bitchy gossip. Ladies (and I use that term loosely), go back to the beauty salon for this crap. Don`t try to call it news.

  92. Profile photo of Nytewulf
    Nytewulf Male 30-39
    513 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:32 am
    This is news?
  93. Profile photo of Afromeister
    Afromeister Male 13-17
    42 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:44 am
    This is stupid!
    retouching photos should be banned.
    She deserves to be shot anyway.
  94. Profile photo of Benjaphar
    Benjaphar Male 30-39
    108 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:51 am
    She`s so real and down-to-earth. She`s just like me, a regular joe - except I want her air-brushed!
  95. Profile photo of Vanwa
    Vanwa Female 13-17
    357 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:57 am
    so they complain when they do airbrush and then they complain when they don`t airbrush.

    You can`t have it both ways.

    Except in bed >_>

  96. Profile photo of tornadofdoom
    tornadofdoom Male 13-17
    1081 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:59 am
    ...Are you serious? This is sad...

    I have the magazine, it`s not that bad.

    How does this have anything to do with politics? I`m just glad this doesn`t represent Republicans in general, or we`d be even more screwed than we are now. (I`m a democrat, btw)

  97. Profile photo of patthebaker
    patthebaker Male 18-29
    1768 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:01 am
    the worlds drated isnt it
  98. Profile photo of Vagrant86
    Vagrant86 Male 18-29
    2556 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:32 am
    ok, so why does this matter? and God good feminism need to die now.
  99. Profile photo of alienmaster
    alienmaster Male 13-17
    21 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:32 am
    This is NOT drating news,


    " OH NOEZ AN IMPERFECT PERSON? "

    WAIT!
    you can see her peach fuzz, and her pours, and her hair roots, and her nose hair, and whatever it is that makes her look absolutely hidious?

    shes not even ugly..
    this is just bitchy gossip
    someone always finds something to bitch about

    what the hell.
    were on the verge of recession, all the other banking companies around the world are going to poo, they could be talking about something meaningful

    like
    maybe
    iraq? recession? more of george bush`s poo maybe?

    im american,
    and im starting to hate the fact i live in this corrupt little country,

    fox news sucks, and shouldnt even be on television.

  100. Profile photo of EthanSmitty
    EthanSmitty Male 13-17
    10 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:32 am
    well isnt that the base of any magazine? people buy it?
  101. Profile photo of gorgack2000
    gorgack2000 Male 13-17
    4682 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:37 am
    Oh. Dear. Lord.

    "It highlights every imperfection that every human has"
    *Head-desk*

  102. Profile photo of Chiefy
    Chiefy Male 18-29
    713 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:39 am
    The media is 100% Hardcore Democrat. Is anyone really that shocked this happened?

  103. Profile photo of Cashcleaner
    Cashcleaner Male 18-29
    319 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:49 am
    So the media, which includes Fox News, is 100% hardcore Democrat?

    Ya, that`s a good one. The guys at work will have a good laugh at it.

  104. Profile photo of emzrok
    emzrok Female 13-17
    1306 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:57 am
    wow, i feel really bad for the girl on the left...the reporter and other girl were obviously teaming up against her, and shes the one whos really right.

    newsweek mightve been trying to show the people of america that palin was, in fact, "one of us" by NOT retouching her photo. to retouch the photo and to say she was like everyone else in america is quite the contradiction, no?

  105. Profile photo of emzrok
    emzrok Female 13-17
    1306 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:58 am
    also, foxnews equals the downward spiral that is the media.
  106. Profile photo of trueninja
    trueninja Male 13-17
    118 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:30 am
    who cares? its just a picture....
  107. Profile photo of autographed
    autographed Male 18-29
    81 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:39 am
    If she`s gorgeous, then why does she need someone to go on a computer and alter her photo?
  108. Profile photo of Neddyf13
    Neddyf13 Male 30-39
    1 post
    October 10, 2008 at 9:39 am
    Someone at Newsweek needs to send a gift basket to Fox News to thank them for all the extra magazines they just help sell.
  109. Profile photo of manicwhite
    manicwhite Male 18-29
    169 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:42 am
    girl on the righ didnt realy put her point across to well "a clear slap in the face". she didnt seem to have realy thought about what she was saying or constructed an arguments at all
  110. Profile photo of Lou-Saydus
    Lou-Saydus Male 13-17
    216 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:46 am
    wait what? they are getting made because somebody DIDN`T shop a picture? That`s a new one...
  111. Profile photo of 6point02
    6point02 Female 18-29
    71 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:52 am
    how can you say that emzrok? just because fox news has the balls to address an issue fairly and without liberal bias, that makes them the "downward spiral that is the media"? excuse me, but i prefer to watch a station that operates fairly and thinks for itself. go ahead and get your biased news from cnn. go ahead and let somebody else think for you. thank god you can`t vote.
  112. Profile photo of Berberry
    Berberry Female 18-29
    161 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:54 am
    haha sarah palin has a mushtache
  113. Profile photo of ilovewasabi
    ilovewasabi Female 18-29
    88 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:55 am
    lol, wow. Totally ridiculous.
  114. Profile photo of rynker
    rynker Male 18-29
    29 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 10:50 am
    the girl on the right was an extreme republican, stupid, and a bitch. Perfect for this debate. Logical democrat views are made to sound wrong on fox.
  115. Profile photo of GothicQueen
    GothicQueen Male 13-17
    4376 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 10:57 am
    wow...a middle aged woman isn`t perfect. How amazing. Who cares if it isn`t re-done? Seriously she walks around everyday without being re-touched so why should the mahgazine be retouched? She isn`t a supermodel she is a stuoid woman running for VP. No one cares if she is pretty or ugly.
  116. Profile photo of Sammichiaki1
    Sammichiaki1 Female 18-29
    206 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 11:00 am
    girl on the right needs to chill out, its just a picture
  117. Profile photo of WhenIsLunch
    WhenIsLunch Male 18-29
    460 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 11:51 am
    so shes basically saying everyone is horrific with out photoshopping their pictures... thats funny she is basically ripping on palin for being hideous
  118. Profile photo of NOFX14
    NOFX14 Male 18-29
    1141 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 11:59 am
    wow what a suprise its fox news...
  119. Profile photo of d_katman
    d_katman Male 13-17
    1836 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:04 pm
    lolololol made of fail.

    she has the finger waving. i`ma stop listening now. kinna stupid really

  120. Profile photo of d_katman
    d_katman Male 13-17
    1836 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:04 pm
    MANY GUYS WILL NO LONGER THINK SHE`S A MILF! NOW HOW WILL WE WIN THE ELECTION?!?!!!
  121. Profile photo of admisaok
    admisaok Male 18-29
    516 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:13 pm
    i didn`t know "unretouched" was a word...
  122. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:16 pm
    1. Mags should do atleast a bit of editing.

    2. The hot girl says so. I agree whole-heartedly with her

  123. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:17 pm
    "the girl on the right was an extreme republican, stupid, and a bitch. Perfect for this debate. Logical democrat views are made to sound wrong on fox."

    Logical democrats.. thats an oxymoron!

  124. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:20 pm
    "But they love to demonize the liberal media!"

    As opposed to the liberal media that loves to demonize fox news.

    Whats the difference?

    The funny thing is most people here are talking about it being how people really look and no one should be upset that they didn`t "fake" her.

    Then most of the people here go out to party`s in brand named clothing and dont leave the house without make-up. Face it, we`re all self-conscious

  125. Profile photo of starrstreet
    starrstreet Female 18-29
    401 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:50 pm
    I can`t take into consideration perspectives from people like prime. There are, I`m sure, tons of people on here who are voting McCain/Palin and can agree this "news" story was idiotic. I mean, there is hardly even an argument here, this is not something that any reputable news station should be reporting on!

    I do not defend MSNBC every chance I get and I wouldn`t because I do think they have a bias. At least I can admit this and take that into consideration every time I watch anything on that channel, which is hardly ever.

    You have to realize what news shows and channels have some sort of bias which is important to know because it is what is motivating their stories. Fox News is usually motivated to make liberals look bad and conservatives good, vice versa for MSNBC! They solely brought up this "issue" for that purpose I just explained.

    I can`t take anyone seriously here who defends tactics like this from news stations.

  126. Profile photo of PostModern
    PostModern Male 18-29
    77 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:52 pm
    republicans are amazing.
    i can smell their poo, and i`m from canada

    and primetimekin, i dunno what you are talking about. republicans made what the world is right now.

  127. Profile photo of sukitjeezus
    sukitjeezus Female 18-29
    134 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 12:59 pm
    It`s sad that the big story as about airbrushing someone`s face on a magazine.
  128. Profile photo of mist3rG
    mist3rG Male 13-17
    41 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:18 pm
    Oh god, why are people getting so upset with this!
    She`s just the VICE president!
  129. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:24 pm
    "and primetimekin, i dunno what you are talking about. republicans made what the world is right now."

    Im going to assume you messed up the order and its republicans made the world what it is right now.

    If that was your statement, then yes.

    We are in a land where blacks, white, hispanics, and asians can all go against Canadians. Its beautiful.

  130. Profile photo of WaywardSon
    WaywardSon Male 13-17
    36 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 1:50 pm
    Wait, isn`t the popular complaint that magazine covers airbrush photos of women to make them look flawless, creating an unfair, unrealistic image? why is this a problem? More magazines should do this, and with more people.
  131. Profile photo of TheSharpest
    TheSharpest Male 18-29
    1767 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:01 pm
    Of course they`re mad! They showed her like she actually is!

    ...wait what?!

    But seriously, an "insult", a "slap to the face", an "unfairness"... That is a bit exaggerated, huh?

  132. Profile photo of tuxman4
    tuxman4 Male 13-17
    368 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:01 pm
    I think its unfair that everyone is being positively prejudiced towards Obama. In my book, racism can be positive and negative.
  133. Profile photo of primetimekin
    primetimekin Male 18-29
    7935 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:02 pm
    "why is this a problem?"

    Because they did it only to her.

    If they did it to everyone then i`m all for it.

  134. Profile photo of dracokain
    dracokain Male 18-29
    266 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:03 pm
    I love how when she asked about the other covers that had obama they didnt care to show them they just got angry
  135. Profile photo of Aysha13
    Aysha13 Female 18-29
    14 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:39 pm
    I wont bother you with my own opinion on the subject itself, as I think it`s pretty unimportant if somebode got airbrushed on a cover or not, but for me living in Europe and being used to another way of discussions on TV, I am really shocked about one thing:

    The blond lady is the host of the show, isn`t she? How on earth is it possible for her to show her own personal opinion (or that of her TV channel) on the matter so clearly?! Shouldn`t she be neutral in her position?

    Is it normal in the US to have to get your information from biased TV stations? I mean, it wasn`t just a slight tendency - it was so very obviously, it hurt!

  136. Profile photo of Llamaz
    Llamaz Male 13-17
    339 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:54 pm
    Yeah, I see why people are angry, but they`re going a little far.
  137. Profile photo of firetiger16
    firetiger16 Female 18-29
    362 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:54 pm
    Yeah the brown haired woman needs to shut the hell up. We were discussing this in my advertising arts class and went over other magazine covers that the presidental and vp canidits have had and MANY of them has some unflattering photos that weren`t touched up at all. The one they were showing of Obama was not retouched the only touch up was with the haloish light. The idiotic reporters need to do their research before opening up their mouths and letting trash spew from them.
  138. Profile photo of bochamockado
    bochamockado Male 18-29
    580 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 2:58 pm
    Uh, re-tard. Brown hair freak needs to shut it.
  139. Profile photo of ericdee
    ericdee Male 18-29
    182 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:16 pm
    Oh course, this is Fox News.

    That`s what she looks like. Why is everyone freaking out? I`m more upset when people are retouched beyond recognition. It`s fake; it makes me think you`re fake. Especially in a political campaign. How can I trust you when I don`t even know what you really look like?

  140. Profile photo of Whaley_girl
    Whaley_girl Female 13-17
    73 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:24 pm
    Poltics shouldn`t even be about how people look anyway.

    Sheesh.

  141. Profile photo of kairobert
    kairobert Male 18-29
    1623 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:33 pm
    "Poltics shouldn`t even be about how people look anyway.

    Sheesh."

    I fully agree.
    The American culture seems to care more about external beauty than reason and intellect.

  142. Profile photo of Crucible
    Crucible Male 18-29
    1815 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:34 pm
    Only in the states are politicians given this much attention.
  143. Profile photo of pepper23
    pepper23 Female 40-49
    14 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:38 pm
    Good lord... did she have a buggar hanging out of her nose too? We should all be so lucky as to have our photos retouched.
  144. Profile photo of penguinpie
    penguinpie Male 18-29
    119 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 3:49 pm
    wow what idiots. She looks fine in the picture
  145. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:09 pm
    Haha! Unretouched? Since when was it wrong NOT to photoshop someone`s picture? That bitch in the red dress needs a punch to the face and another punch to elsewhere.
  146. Profile photo of WolvesUnit
    WolvesUnit Male 13-17
    39 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:30 pm
    "haha gross slap in the face"

    Id slap my dick in her face

  147. Profile photo of NYAAN
    NYAAN Female 13-17
    316 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:35 pm
    BS.

    why is there news dedicated to this?

  148. Profile photo of canaryellow
    canaryellow Female 13-17
    422 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 4:43 pm
    i don`t understand why you guys are getting mad at Fox. They gave equal time to both arguements and they were simply addressin an issue that some people seem to think is controversial. I don`t think that you guys should scorn the news channel for addressing the topic.
    I can understand how this would be seen offensive. Magazines tend to retouch EVERY picture, and even though I thik that flaws are beautiful, slapping them on the cover of a magazine to sell it seems disrespectful.
  149. Profile photo of alfietoon
    alfietoon Male 18-29
    1164 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:43 pm
    would u really want sum1 who seems flawless or wud u want sum1 who is more human running office?

    not biased retards

  150. Profile photo of tharith
    tharith Male 18-29
    266 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:44 pm

    problem solved.

  151. Profile photo of paradix
    paradix Male 18-29
    143 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 5:48 pm
    I was seriously looking for the Onion logo during this... even though the Fox logo was there, I couldn`t believe this was real!
  152. Profile photo of Syris
    Syris Male 13-17
    219 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:09 pm
    `they`re all women`
    lolol
  153. Profile photo of slepre
    slepre Female 18-29
    310 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:13 pm
    i think its kinda mean to her i mean she does look like all her flaws are showing shes has pimples big pores and a little facial hair and crow feets i mean they are right they do portray obama like god
  154. Profile photo of seankerr001
    seankerr001 Male 18-29
    140 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:39 pm
    "A clear slap in the face!" Uh!
    So retarded. Stupid Fox News.
    Why are they complaining about not retouching the photo. This is just stupid.
  155. Profile photo of bmanthe2
    bmanthe2 Male 13-17
    390 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 6:44 pm
    *vomits in disgust* what the fuzzles. Seriously? what are they whinning about now?
  156. Profile photo of Skyeofgreen
    Skyeofgreen Female 18-29
    209 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:15 pm
    The issue is that it is Presidential race not a beauty contest. I wish that when there was an election no one knew names, faces, race or sex of any candidates, there were only views and issues. I think a lot of people would be surprised who they actually voted for without all the discriminatory factors in play. there would be candidate A and candidate B, who do you more agree with.
  157. Profile photo of laddsta
    laddsta Male 18-29
    152 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 7:22 pm
    both the women talking about how ugly the photo is are dratugly
  158. Profile photo of Coodude26
    Coodude26 Male 13-17
    340 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:15 pm
    "unretouched".
    Wow.
  159. Profile photo of Coodude26
    Coodude26 Male 13-17
    340 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 8:17 pm
    Also, obama looks really bad in that picture. I don`t know what they`re talking about.
  160. Profile photo of HolyDiver
    HolyDiver Female 13-17
    59 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 9:52 pm
    This is really what our society has come to? Wasteing time on a news channel where actual important topics can be highlighted, we use it for whining about a freckin "unretouched" picture on a damn magazine.

    Is this really what we bish about? I can`t wait to move to Canada. This is sick.

  161. Profile photo of GothicQueen
    GothicQueen Male 13-17
    4376 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 11:07 pm
    <--starts packing bags for Canada
  162. Profile photo of GothicQueen
    GothicQueen Male 13-17
    4376 posts
    October 10, 2008 at 11:26 pm
    The Picture

    Yes. The unretouched picture. LARGE. No jokes. in all it`s glory. And quite honestly I don`t see a problem. She looks a hell of a lot better then I would I`ll give her that much.

    so honestly? where is the problem?

  163. Profile photo of yudontn0me
    yudontn0me Male 18-29
    845 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 1:46 am
    i noticed that this election turned into obama vs palin.
  164. Profile photo of BigWaFuu
    BigWaFuu Male 18-29
    1163 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 3:51 am
    oook...? Retards. First I thought "wtf does untouched means".

    Then I hear "showing human flaws we all have" well if we all have them, then you wont give a flying drat if hers are shown on a mag cover?

    Overreaction is an understatement. drating women.

  165. Profile photo of maverybones
    maverybones Female 18-29
    81 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 4:13 am
    my thoughts exactly holydiver.
  166. Profile photo of Ghostofme16
    Ghostofme16 Female 18-29
    386 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 4:43 am
    ITS NEWSWEEK NOT COSMO
    dammit
  167. Profile photo of syke22
    syke22 Male 18-29
    1136 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 6:01 am
    In my opinion she doesnt even look that bad... i dunno what that woman was goin on about facial hair..

    -Thanks for the picture GothicQueen

  168. Profile photo of BoNe_Juggalo
    BoNe_Juggalo Male 13-17
    352 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 7:07 am
    Oh your god... If McCain is elected, he`s gonna die, and than.. and than.... ughhh...
  169. Profile photo of adam1993
    adam1993 Male 13-17
    242 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 7:29 am
    This isnt a fricking seventeen mag. AND SHES A MOM SO STFU
  170. Profile photo of shelerella
    shelerella Female 18-29
    160 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 8:23 am
    Ha ha! Leave it to Fox News to put a bunch of cheerleaders on to "debate" when somebody doesn`t look good in their photo. Like OMG!
  171. Profile photo of runroy
    runroy Male 18-29
    103 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 11:02 am
    So if it`s untouched than its what she actually looks like... How is that debatable?
    Once again it`s Fox... no surprise....
  172. Profile photo of britt566
    britt566 Female 18-29
    2290 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 11:07 am
    Why would looks even matter??? She is beautiful.... but obviously someone smacked her in the face..
  173. Profile photo of gamerdude94
    gamerdude94 Male 13-17
    404 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 12:30 pm
    What? Do they think that everyone won`t vote for her, because she looks slightly uglier than usual?
  174. Profile photo of Smashking
    Smashking Male 18-29
    773 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 1:43 pm
    If they use a natural photo, doesn`t that show the raw and human-like qualities they have instead off focusing on being gilded by lies? And who even cares?

    ...

    Oh wait, Fox News, that explains a lot.

  175. Profile photo of NowPleaseRea
    NowPleaseRea Male 70 & Over
    176 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 2:29 pm
    Meanwhile the economy goes south. Have you put at least a thousand dollars in cash at your disposal? The government may have to banks doors if there is a panic run. Fox is trivial and passe. Their Georgie porgie boy wonder has screwed everything up right across the board
  176. Profile photo of yappyJAP
    yappyJAP Female 18-29
    167 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 5:21 pm
    This seems to me just a chance for Faux News to complain when McCain/Palin doesn`t win. "Oh, it`s because they showed the flaws in her looks!" No, it will be because Palin loves to show us all the flaws in her miniscule brain.
  177. Profile photo of akijade
    akijade Female 18-29
    1006 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 5:53 pm
    lol. Slow news day at Fox studios.
  178. Profile photo of boredfjord
    boredfjord Male 13-17
    928 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 7:31 pm
    Did McCain kill a baby and Fox News is trying to distract us from that?
  179. Profile photo of carolinads13
    carolinads13 Female 13-17
    151 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 7:56 pm
    Has anyone noticed that whatever a guest speaker has the `opposing view` on Fox news, they get yelled at by the host??

    Another reason I avoid Fox news. They`re slightly biased...

  180. Profile photo of SoCal
    SoCal Male 18-29
    650 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 8:24 pm
    Only girls would come up with an argument as stupid as that one. Thank god there hasn`t been a woman president.
  181. Profile photo of Majase
    Majase Male 40-49
    249 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 8:28 pm
    This may be one of the most pointless, retarded and sad "features" I`ve ever seen on so-called candidates.

    And that, dear people is saying a LOT, considering I find most of these things about as insightful as picking my toenails in a drunken stupor.

  182. Profile photo of ashley6405
    ashley6405 Female 18-29
    79 posts
    October 11, 2008 at 8:42 pm
    i saw this newscover at work, and we all had a wonderful laugh about her moustache... i dont think its newsweeks fault, she shoulda waxed that thing.
  183. Profile photo of sam111
    sam111 Male 30-39
    77 posts
    October 12, 2008 at 9:47 am
    bias
  184. Profile photo of BUNNNNIIEEES
    BUNNNNIIEEES Male 18-29
    6 posts
    October 12, 2008 at 6:14 pm
    I`m not American but this makes me angry.
    If anything an untouched photo does more than having a retouched one. It shows flaws and portrays honesty. Is this really the most pressing issue?.
    come on Fox News wake the drat up
  185. Profile photo of kaizen_man68
    kaizen_man68 Male 30-39
    52 posts
    October 13, 2008 at 4:20 pm
    Fox Noise isn`t a saint when it comes to slanting a story with modified pictures. Take a look:

    http://mediamatters.org/items/2008070200...

  186. Profile photo of 6point02
    6point02 Female 18-29
    71 posts
    October 14, 2008 at 4:12 pm
    the only point here is that if you`re going to do it to one person, do it to the other. that`s just common sense. and when has it EVER been a standard practice to put a picture that tight on someone`s face and then print it on a cover without retouching? it`s just stupid and unfair. just read the damn caption. it`s an attempt to make her look plain.
  187. Profile photo of driftingby
    driftingby Female 13-17
    57 posts
    October 14, 2008 at 9:50 pm
    yeah, I`m definitely agreeing with the notion that it`s a perfectly fine pic. I see no moustache and she looks pretty good, IMO. and they overused the words, "this was a clear slap"

    if I was Palin I`d be ticked at all my "defenders" basically calling me a dog.

  188. Profile photo of Fojos
    Fojos Male 18-29
    170 posts
    October 15, 2008 at 10:48 am
    Maybe Barack Obama just looks better? :o
  189. Profile photo of Haza-chan
    Haza-chan Female 18-29
    62 posts
    October 17, 2008 at 9:53 am
    But... she doesn`t look THAT bad... D: I`m disappointed.
  190. Profile photo of evilempress1
    evilempress1 Female 13-17
    416 posts
    November 4, 2008 at 3:41 pm
    WHAT THE ?????
  191. Profile photo of Gunit1
    Gunit1 Female 13-17
    850 posts
    November 4, 2008 at 3:41 pm
    OMG!!! Poor...Poor....Sarah! SHUT THE drat UP!
  192. Profile photo of evilempress1
    evilempress1 Female 13-17
    416 posts
    November 4, 2008 at 3:45 pm
    Why did she keep saying "a slap in the face?"
  193. Profile photo of cahalla
    cahalla Female 18-29
    961 posts
    April 24, 2009 at 4:53 pm
    been removed =(

Leave a Reply