Emily Is Not Real - CGI Is Getting Better

Submitted by: littlemissqt 8 years ago Tech

Her face is CGI. One can only wonder what the porn industry will do with this new and improved technology.
There are 88 comments:
Male 4,807
Last poster.
0
Reply
Male 2,788
:50 scared the crap out of me
0
Reply
Male 291
fap fap fap
0
Reply
Male 69
no f*ckin WAY!
0
Reply
Male 80
at :50 i pooed myself
0
Reply
Female 609
Actually they make computer animated porn in japan..
0
Reply
Male 28
hahah thats awesome. haha at the porn comments :P
0
Reply
Male 436
She may have looked real but she also ACTED real... like a real beeotch.
0
Reply
Male 1
iz dat sum spacetime fusion?

http://gizmodo.com/5038183/photographs-e...

i hope you don`t feel too stupid, lol

rated 1

0
Reply
Male 7
I dont believe the words on the screen. It must be real. It must.
0
Reply
Male 174
I think that`s Emily o` Brian :P She sat behind me in my stage lighting class in college.
0
Reply
Male 230
HAHAHA iroj, that pic is class...
0
Reply
Male 48
omg, so "land of the uncanny valley"-esque
0
Reply
Female 100
i mean...she looks real i guess. just really weird. i`ve seen weirder looking people
0
Reply
Male 1,140
aww i wanted someone to say "FAKE!!!" in one of their posts and then get humiliated like every other person who says "FAKE!!!" on this website
0
Reply
Male 11,740
Yeah, it`s better but still not quite there yet.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
andrewgaynor: I included it because the porn industry isn`t really known for leaving taboos and fetishes alone. It will happen and it will get banned quicker than you can say "moral ambiguity".
0
Reply
Male 2,553
Awesome. eyes are hard to do im sure we will master it eventually.
0
Reply
Male 2,855
her face seems too fat and her eyes too apart, i mean if she is cgi why make her ugly?

also her eyes look devoid of life and human warmth, you cant cgi that

0
Reply
Female 11
Pretty impressive, even though the eyes looked kinda weird.
0
Reply
Male 1,894
This isn`t what the porn industry is going to be messing with next. They are going to start messing with Real 3D, like Journey to the Center of the Earth.
0
Reply
Female 688
"All i can think is, "OH MY GOD, this will be so cool when applied to The Sims!""

You too opiebreath.!!!

Anyway, back to the video. They need to work a bit on the facial movements. Do something with those eyes and the mouth was way too big for such a pointy face... it was remarkable, and I would just think that the girl was trying too hard to be posh if I hadn`t known.

0
Reply
Male 169
Why is it that every new computer break though is thought of as "how can we apply this to the porn industry?"
0
Reply
Male 370
tiredof nicks^^^

That last part creeped the crap out of me... Why would you even think or consider that a possibility :P

0
Reply
Male 5,094
Arkenoid, if she blinks too much it is because the face actress blinks too much. This is just like motion capturing, only more detailed.

Let`s see here, porn applications off the top of my head:
Anonymous porn acting. You contribute the body, they add a face.
Custom-made celebrity flicks. Who do YOU want to see doing a Paris Hilton? Or doing Paris Hilton for that matter?
"Underage" porn. Adult actors styled to look to be in their early teens.

0
Reply
Female 264
at least maybe now they wont make crappy cgi
movies involving animals making crap jokes
and otherwise using crude humour to do anything
0
Reply
Male 43
She blinks too much, the corners of teh mouth move in a weird way and certain proportionate placements of eyes/mouth/nose seem to switch around at times. It`s pretty visible, but still, best I`ve seen so far.
0
Reply
Female 1,496
Yup she is real time. The eyes are the real trouble. SOuless.
0
Reply
Male 807
Her mannerisms were bizarre.
0
Reply
Male 319
I`d hit it with my ten-inch hard drive.
0
Reply
Female 251
uncanny valley! uncanny valley!

wait...can it still happen if this is based off of something real

i don`t care
gaaaahhh!

0
Reply
Female 631
yeah the mouth and the eyes look a bit off.
but it`s still good

ofcourse it`d be better if the video had better quality..

0
Reply
Male 1,557
The teeth look a little off but its great. Its not CGI as such because its a bit obviously gonna be based off someone`s real movements, but still, VERY good.

When computer games, especially shooting/action games get people like this in them... I dont think I`d be comfortable playing them anymore!

0
Reply
Male 194
FAKE!!!!! umm how does one call that on this kind of video?
0
Reply
Female 498
pretty interesting...
0
Reply
Female 32
That is amazing
0
Reply
Male 904
very nice! they are dangerously close to crossing the line between real and cgi... treading along it...
0
Reply
Male 296
STOP POSTING POSTS WITH MISLEADING INFORMATION!

THIS IS NOT CGI/PRE-RENDERED! This is actually realtime, brough to you by cinema 2.0, a programming suite that greatly enhances on the capabilities of ati`s new RV7xx cards and will only get better with time.

THIS IS REAL-TIME!

0
Reply
Female 19
Ack! More creepy-looking CGI`s! *hides*
0
Reply
Male 108
And if you don`t like the crappy low-res youtube version, here`s more from their site: http://www.awntv.com/videos/image-metric...
0
Reply
Male 16
Wasn`t that movie Beowulf made by using this kind of stuff?
0
Reply
Female 536
I completely love the way her mouth is crooked

I`m so serious

0
Reply
Male 273
holy cow. this is amazing. looks totally real, but that little ounce of thought of "it`s actually not real" keeps getting at me, but only very slightly. they`ve got to be using that new facial-screening technique. emily looks a little like kiera knightley.
0
Reply
Male 4,867
this in sims, porn and gta.

WOW

0
Reply
Male 353
looked real but... something was missing. Maybe it`s just me but, no matter how real it looks it seems lifeless. Just a feeling I guess.
0
Reply
Male 1,141
you could still tell, parts of the face were pretty obvious.
0
Reply
Male 591
the quality of the film is also used to trick you, but if you watch the way she speaks it was easy to tell it was fake. There is a lot of work to be done. It is getting better, but if you really couldn`t tell, there is something wrong with you.
0
Reply
Male 1,182
ehh didnt look real to me
0
Reply
Male 2,600
I can still tell it is CGI, and not because I was told as much. Humans are not intuitive enough to account for every little detail, and so any lengthy, continuous animation has oddities. It`s too smooth, for one.
0
Reply
Female 90
Wow. Can tell a little bit that its computer generated, but still, wow.
0
Reply
Male 1,468
Oh my. Look. More grounds to call stuff fake. ==`
0
Reply
Female 1,470
Holy hell thats brilliant
0
Reply
Male 1,036
Besides, in the age of High Definition image and 10 plus megapixel cameras, CGI animation is only good for fantasy settings. Real people look realer on film that in real life.
0
Reply
Male 1,036
No no, Emily is a real girl.

It`s a dub, but instead of dubbing her voice they dubbed her apperance.

0
Reply
Male 117
ITS b.S. they still have to act out and the computer copies the moving picture.. this is dumb
0
Reply
Male 370
hehehenerd, this technology was already used in gta iv :P

click here

And on the front page it should have an even better video than the emily one!

0
Reply
Male 370
I submitted this a week ago :( and nothing :(

IAB really needs more people checking the submissions it gets :P

0
Reply
Male 123
I will be the frist too say it I`ll Tap That. ^-^
0
Reply
Female 326
That`s pretty good. It looked a bit fuzzy, but that may be due to the quality when they put it on YouTube, not necessarily the CGI`s quality.
0
Reply
Male 108
dam! u could still tell but not if you wernt paying close attention, i would have thought she was a real person with some kind of disease(twitchy) if i didnt already know she was CGI
0
Reply
Male 509
Oh, by the way, does anyone remember the 90`s Disney movie Smart House? That`s what this reminds me of.
0
Reply
Male 536
The key thing that gives it away is that she looks like a freshly re-animated zombie.
0
Reply
Male 4,680
Now THAT is CGI. Still didn`t look totally real though, her skin was too plain.
0
Reply
Female 192
that looked totally real to me! now if only they could apply that to the crappy cgi in some of today`s movies.
0
Reply
Male 5,970
gta is going to get to real....
0
Reply
Female 4,197
"Looks vaguely like Keira Knightley"

Thats what I thought too

0
Reply
Male 1,407
Looks vaguely like Keira Knightley.
0
Reply
Male 907
Now all they need is to make the eyes a little more closer together and looking in the same drating direction...
0
Reply
Male 509
Image Metrics did the facial morphing for Grand Theft Auto IV. They work for a lot of big name companies.
0
Reply
Male 553
that was just creepy
0
Reply
Female 960
You`re just romanticising it.
0
Reply
Female 311
really good but her eyes were dead. I wonder if this is because the emotion or soul shown through human eyes is nigh on impossible to recreate with technology or perhaps I am romanticising it. :|
0
Reply
Female 738
Because listening to people being boring in real life just isn`t good enough anymore...
0
Reply
Female 960
Good ol` Sainsbury! Granted, this was last year, so the ambiguous sign might not be there anymore. :[

I found it up in Leeds.

0
Reply
Male 2,593
Lemontarte,
They`ll find a way... Perhaps in game form.
(hmmmm.....)
*starts typing code vigorously*
0
Reply
Female 1,142
Phenomenal animation, no doubt.
But the model...
I just wanna reach through the screen and push her eyes closer together. >.<
0
Reply
Female 393
Iroj - HA i like your photo XD

Sainsbury`s eh?? I`m gonna see if my local one has such an ambiguos sign for innocent smoothies too hehe.

0
Reply
Male 1,766
It was good. they need a little work on the eyes need to be a little more dull less energetic
0
Reply
Female 1,441
techgeek07, why would they need technology like this?
0
Reply
Female 960
This is photo-shopped...I can tell by the pixels and having seen many shops in my time.

...Oh, wait.

0
Reply
Female 393
All i can think is, "OH MY GOD, this will be so cool when applied to The Sims!"


You speak the truth

0
Reply
Male 214
I couldn`t help but feel creeped out by her for some reason..
0
Reply
Female 15,763
o_O

That`s creepy.

It really amazes me how complex facial movements are, especially in talking and how the mouth and jaw move.

All i can think is, "OH MY GOD, this will be so cool when applied to The Sims!"

0
Reply
Male 2,593
Wait till the porn industry gets ahold of this one
0
Reply
Male 405
eh the mouth and eyes could use work, though if i didnt know it was fake to begin with i might have thought it to be real.
0
Reply
Male 174
freak!
0
Reply
Female 393
Pretty cool what they can do with CGI now.

I`m still getting to grips with microsoft paint.

0
Reply
Female 1,330
Link: Emily Is Not Real - CGI Is Getting Better [Rate Link] - Her face is CGI. One can only wonder what the porn industry will do with this new and improved technology.
0
Reply