Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
I was going to post the words... Now I`m pissed. leave this site and go find your dog or something.
Anyway, that clip, like all southpark episodes, was stupid...
After several mutations, branchings, and scoial and behaviorial evolution, our perspective changed.
The forum has evolved, we are talking about global warming.
But Mrs. Garrison is sort of right.
Mutation, mutation, mutation, mutation, muytation....mutation...mutation, mutation...five million mutations...
Ok, not 5 million m7tations maybe, but still.
And it didn`t really originate woth Darwin. Darwin just developed the idea of Naturel Selection.
rcjdude, it`s from the episode "go god go" and it`s a two parter
It`s hard to avoid getting annoyed when your opponent is remarking upon ethnic stereotypes, engaging in petty self-fellation, citing wildly false claims as evidence, and casually dismissing the bulk of davy`s entire profession due to not understanding the concepts involved. It`s straining.
Not at all. There is no perspective with evidence to support such a claim.
"Just as long as in one perspective im at the center of the universe, then its ok."
Sarcastic or not, what a prick.
Science has never been about finding absolute truth. Absolute truth, as we tend to think of it, doesn`t exist. What`s left is continually updating our best explanation, and at this point that explanation is evolution. Nothing proves these explanations - they just fit the evidence, and to that end serve the purpose of satiating our curiosity, at least until we discover something better. If there is a better explanation out there, the scientific method would be the vehicle with which we`d discover it.
No, Cartman is just anxious. That strains the voice a bit in his case.
Earth going around the sun is true from one perspective, not necessarily another. Just as long as in one perspective im at the center of the universe, then its ok.
You might as well point out how Islamists deny gravity, or buddhists deny that death happens, or Christians deny the earth rotates around the sun. It is meaningless. I could just as well point out "Well, engineers say the Golden Gate Bridge is a suspension span, but people from Armenia disagree with this view." Abso-f*cking-lutely irrelevant.
I say again: leave the science to the scientists.
"And they contradict the extensive evidence presented in the most recent IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] report."
The guy`s ignoring greenhouse gases entirely. The Sun is not heating up. He`s getting support from the groups against the notion of global warming, in spite of a complete lack of scientific basis for his ludicrous claims.
"And red stars are colder than yellow and blue stars."
Not when they swell large enough to engulf Mercury.
Not when they`re two inches from your face, buddy.
And just because one bloke called Habibullo Abdussamatov says that it`s not due to Milancoviç cyclicity, doesn`t necessarily make it so. 99% of climatologists agree that evidence from carbon isotopes, as well as absolute abundance of CO2 in earth`s atmosphere since the industrial revolution, strongly point to an anthropogeni...
Oh, f*ck it. You believe that comic book guy who says the earth is shrinking. Leave the science to the scientists, Prime.
And red stars are colder than yellow and blue stars.
Yes, that is what we believed when church controlled state, and scientific research into such topics was forbidden. No surprise there.
Mainstream science is fine, your inability to perform accurate research is at fault. Mars is not heating up. The sun will not become hotter until it reaches the critical point and becomes a red giant, and since it`s several billion years old any change would be so minute wouldn`t matter in the slightest.
Mainstream science for the win.
Yeah, but at one point we believed that the woman was just a nesting hole for the sperm. This is a perfect example of no matter what you believe, your still wrong
Teach the controversy!
"Two different theories exist on the origin of children: Sexual reproduction, and the stork. Many believe in the theory of sexual reproduction because they have been taught this theory at school. However, many philosophers favor the theory of the stork. Therefore, if the theory of sexual reproduction is to be taught in schools, it must only be taught as a theory and alternative theories, such as the theory of the stork must also be taught."
But some religious types can still believe in evolution. So you can`t pick out all of them by way of debate.
We could. But that would be so unfair- creationism vs evolution debates on IAB pay fancylad`s rent.