Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
And it wasn`t just `splattered on`. He built himself a complex system of pullies, levers, and machines that all made a slightly different effect with the paint, and each had to be worked and timed carefully. His work took skill and planning, it wasn`t just paint thrown on canvas.
Tiget Woods? Pah. Get a friggen life. Some people might think it`s art, but where`s the meaning in it? There`s no passion and dedication. Art used to be about emotion and translating the world the artist saw into something different and unique. Now it`s just a title. You can take a dump on cardboard and call it art, and the world will think you`re a prodigy. No one cares anymore as long as they get their fifteen minutes of fame, even if they already di
And yea, art isn`t `art` anymore. This junk they`re calling `modern`...yea...it sucks.
As for the video, hey go for it Tiger.. But i look down on the car company for this. It doesn`t look like good art. The idea was genuine gold, but it didn`t turn out all that great and certainly doesn`t go well with "It shows what we put into our cars." Art + car = nothing. It doesn`t show anything related to your cars expect the fact that you can put them in the same room. Fail. just fail.
Whatever though, someone`ll buy this for 7.1 million bucks. you watch.
And it did look like that, Zelkari. :-/
I still hate Tiger Woods.
This is not 2000. No one cares anymore.
I agree with MarthFador that it doesn`t really take much artistic ability to randomly throw paint onto a canvas and make it look interesting, but it`s nice that Tiger is doing it for charity. I`ll always back something if it`s done for a good cause.
I must say I applaud Tiger for doing something like this, having a good humour about it, and having fun....but I`ll also say that I never really considered those random splatter peices as `art`