Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
Yes the film is historical junk, but the cracking of the Enigma codes was an Allied victory, albeit a largely British one.
I don`t think we should be hating on 2001: Space Odyssey though. I mean, the book was written ages ago and the film was filmed quite a while ago. It was set in the future, not the past.
They missed a lot of the problems with both the Patriot and Braveheart. The battle of Stirling Bridge took place in Braveheart WITHOUT the bridge. That damn bridge collapsing was the only thing that allowed the scotts to win the battle.
Haha, dude, I agree that Birth of a Nation should`ve been on there. Ah well, the author probably wanted to cater to a more, er, younger audience. Like 13.
that the outlines of its continents match up perfectly with the crevasses of the moon
Conclusion: HUMANS ARE DISENDANTS OF EWOKS!!! (The creatures in the movies that look like us are simply shaved gorillas)
its in mayan, which is alive and kicking. get your poo straight before you make stupid statements.
Get you history from books, not movies.
And also, it`s the most accurate major science fiction film I can think of, as it portrays space realistically (ships not having to use thrusters in space, as there`s no air resistance, no sound in space, the portrayals of weightlessness)
They just put 2001 at the bottom to try and be funny, and maybe to irritate film buffs.
secondly in my last post the word censor replaced cra p with poo but left dick? WTF!!, way to go springing for the top of the line censor software IAB.
really if the SPARTANS knew they would die how do you think the Thespians felt
10,000 BC is a piece of poo that would make any self-respecting man of history commit ritual suicide just for looking at a movie poster for it
Gladiator really wasn`t too bad, but i don`t like movies that potray Marcus Aurelius as a victim of circumstance during his reign, the guy was a dick, smart, but a dick nonetheless
besides if i wanted to watch a historically correct movie.. i would go back to HS an i dont
and i wana be entertain.. not bored to death with history movies
When I want to learn history I`ll read one of my history books.
When I want to be entertained, I`ll watch a movie.
Just as long as people don`t take the movies for fact, then there`s no problem.
Of course it`s inaccurate, it was written in 1968!!!
ROFLMAO. Simply classic.
Umm...no. 300 was not a historically accurate movie, it wasn`t even "accurate enough". I just think it was an attempt by Hollywood to depict Persians as "animals then, animals now". Very propoganda-ishly made.
People need to read up on Persian history, especially now that the war drums are being beaten against Iran.
i hate that film. i think that the fact its in a MADE UP LANGUAGE really weakened it. ¬_¬
Sweet Jesus, my dreams have been crushed.</sarcasm>