The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 59    Average: 3.4/5]
47 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 12844
Rating: 3.4
Category: Entertainment
Date: 02/24/08 12:15 AM

47 Responses to Star Trek XI Movie Trailer

  1. Profile photo of timetinkerer
    timetinkerer Male 13-17
    3 posts
    February 23, 2008 at 11:21 pm
    Link: Star Trek XI Movie Trailer - Finally, a decent Star Trek trailer that wasn`t bootlegged in a theater with a video camera.
  2. Profile photo of angelicamber
    angelicamber Female 18-29
    1572 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:18 am
    SIMON PEGG AND SYLER!!!
    *Glomp*
  3. Profile photo of BikerTeen
    BikerTeen Male 13-17
    2113 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:18 am
    saw this befor i think it is going to be bad sorry
  4. Profile photo of angelicamber
    angelicamber Female 18-29
    1572 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:20 am
    :/....though it is a cool ship
    (even though none of the characters are in it)
  5. Profile photo of T3h-Wraith
    T3h-Wraith Male 13-17
    645 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:20 am
    Multi-Fail....Sh*t, Is it even possible to combine fails?
  6. Profile photo of Novem006
    Novem006 Female 18-29
    700 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:25 am
    hmmm....
  7. Profile photo of GrnFantasic
    GrnFantasic Male 13-17
    602 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:28 am
    Oh read the title wrong... I thought it said Star Wars 9
  8. Profile photo of Nightshifter
    Nightshifter Male 18-29
    513 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:31 am

    Too bad it`s no longer being released on Christmas of 2008.

    I don`t think I can wait till the summer of 2009. :(

  9. Profile photo of EvilM
    EvilM Male 13-17
    411 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:36 am
    I think this might actually be good. I`m not a fan of star trek by any stretch of the imagination, but I arn`t going to rule this one out just yet :-).
  10. Profile photo of mastercif
    mastercif Male 13-17
    458 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:52 am
    eh, theres absolutley nothing good about star trek that makes it work watching
    its not a good movie if you like deep scifi stories because theres only been like 392408534923098479 different episodes and seasons some which do not relate to each other not to mention twice as many books and again half of them don`t even relate to each other
    and then if you like action movies and what not star trek is probably the worst choice out of any movie, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1eFdUSna... hell the "fight" scenes in Disney movies are better than Star treks, and these are the only two things star trek has
  11. Profile photo of LoofahBoy
    LoofahBoy Male 18-29
    3301 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:56 am
    ^^Damn mastercif, you have truly mastered the art of the run-on sentence.

    So if I understand, this will be a series reboot?

  12. Profile photo of Nightshifter
    Nightshifter Male 18-29
    513 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 12:58 am

    mastercif, do you know that we don`t have to pay for punctuations on this site?

    Fancylad isn`t going to drain your bank account if you use a period or a comma.

  13. Profile photo of _Requiem_
    _Requiem_ Female 18-29
    469 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:04 am
    Well mastercif, I`m sure if there was no fan base for Star Trek, they would have stopped at around Episode 2004085371238.
  14. Profile photo of Talpa
    Talpa Male 18-29
    179 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:09 am
    huh, a star trek movie starring john cho, karl urban and eric bana? thats wierd.
  15. Profile photo of Talpa
    Talpa Male 18-29
    179 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:10 am
    oh i get it, they`re trying to fill seats. i still wont watch it.
  16. Profile photo of KoalaMeatPie
    KoalaMeatPie Male 18-29
    2578 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:14 am
    I don`t know how they can top "brain-eating slug"
    This looks like a good movie though, Deep Science/Space adventure Fantasy - thing.

    The "" of movies.

    I hope. I was more into TNG and Voyager, just a "woo-hoo" fan not a "Luke Picard Could soo Kick Kirk`s ass" fan.

  17. Profile photo of lucid_wizard
    lucid_wizard Male 18-29
    308 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:14 am
    oh my..i think I just orgasmed
  18. Profile photo of Talpa
    Talpa Male 18-29
    179 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:14 am
    and Simon Pegg too? is this suppose to be a comedy? Abrahms is really reaching on this movie.
  19. Profile photo of Demian
    Demian Male 13-17
    60 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:23 am
    That was absolutely the worst trailer I have ever seen.
  20. Profile photo of Monsdurr
    Monsdurr Male 13-17
    741 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:37 am
    I`m not a Star Trek fan, but I`ll probably watch it has long as it doesn`t have those aliens from the newer Star Trek show that look like they have vagoos for heads.
  21. Profile photo of BigBonny
    BigBonny Male 18-29
    2216 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 2:08 am
    They should`ve at least got Shatner to say the "Space..." bit instead of Nimoy`s "Spayshe, the final froncheer"
  22. Profile photo of Pabasa
    Pabasa Male 18-29
    4012 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 2:18 am
    Very very very very dull trailer...

    It doesn`t give us anything new. LAME.

    Then again the only reason I`ll probably be watching the movie is Zachary Quinto and Eric Bana... *goes off to write some slashfic*

  23. Profile photo of BigWaFuu
    BigWaFuu Male 18-29
    1163 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 3:44 am
    ~yawn
  24. Profile photo of gorgack2000
    gorgack2000 Male 13-17
    4682 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 3:57 am
    Looks pretty good actually, but that`s my opinion.
  25. Profile photo of astridhaze
    astridhaze Female 18-29
    738 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 5:22 am
    mastercif is obviously too stupid to understand sci-fi.

    I`m waiting for him to say, "I, Robot was the dumbest book ever because it`s not all the same story. They don`t even go together."

    You fail.

  26. Profile photo of FIRST_poster
    FIRST_poster Male 18-29
    970 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 5:46 am
    it just wouldnt be the same
    *refers to earlier movee about drugs and startrek*
  27. Profile photo of FIRST_poster
    FIRST_poster Male 18-29
    970 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 6:05 am
    it just wouldnt be the same
    *refers to earlier movee about drugs and startrek*
  28. Profile photo of catbarf
    catbarf Male 18-29
    1455 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 7:37 am
    Probably gonna suck. A shame.
  29. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10441 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 7:38 am
    I also thought it said star wars. Bah! Good enough I guess.
  30. Profile photo of Corporate_BJ
    Corporate_BJ Male 18-29
    16 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 7:40 am
    That trailer kept me Klinging-on to the edge of my seat. Nah,what a load of ****
  31. Profile photo of TGPZarquon
    TGPZarquon Male 30-39
    166 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 8:47 am
    OR... you can just go to the official site where it`s been in full-screen, hi-definition in the correct aspect ratio for months...
  32. Profile photo of TGPZarquon
    TGPZarquon Male 30-39
    166 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 8:49 am
    And yes, it probably will suck. And yes, I`m such a geek that I`ll probably still see it - then bitch about how much it sucks online. Why does Hollywood feel the need to rape everything I loved?
  33. Profile photo of EvilAKappy
    EvilAKappy Male 18-29
    133 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:01 am
    Is this the one where the Enterpirse transforms into a giant robot and destroys the world all captured by amateur video....The name will be Star Trekfieldformers I: The Quest for More Money...
  34. Profile photo of bmanthe2
    bmanthe2 Male 13-17
    390 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:08 am
    I don`t know how the movies gonna be but the preview doesn`t look half bad.
  35. Profile photo of bochamockado
    bochamockado Male 18-29
    580 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:15 am
    It gave me shivers...
  36. Profile photo of FeeFee
    FeeFee Female 18-29
    583 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:15 am
    Well GrnFantasic, you really read it wrong because it`s Star Trek 11 not Star Wars 9...lol.
  37. Profile photo of d_87bob
    d_87bob Male 18-29
    48 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:35 am
    This has the ability to become the best trek movie ever. Not that it has to try all that hard after Nemesis...
  38. Profile photo of EvianPosh
    EvianPosh Male 18-29
    125 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:39 am
    that told me nothing...
  39. Profile photo of Giligadi
    Giligadi Male 40-49
    356 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 9:45 am
    "Finally"? Absolutely correct.. AT LAST, a preview of some crap big budget waste of time! The world`s ills are finally cured.
  40. Profile photo of notsoevil
    notsoevil Female 18-29
    101 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 11:36 am
    Thats about as interesting as watching guys on a construction site.

    . . . Oh wait.

  41. Profile photo of larajunky
    larajunky Female 40-49
    1832 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 11:38 am
    "^^Damn mastercif, you have truly mastered the art of the run-on sentence.
    So if I understand, this will be a series reboot?"


    ROTFLDFAO LoofahBoy. I was srsly saying practically the same thing in my head. )-| :-P

  42. Profile photo of larajunky
    larajunky Female 40-49
    1832 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 11:43 am
    IDK... I think the movie is going to be really good. The others all seem so 2-D.This, at least, seems like they put some kind of effort into it. The previous ones were just......bad.
  43. Profile photo of Overmann
    Overmann Male 18-29
    2600 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 1:59 pm
    Finally the Star Trek franchise is out of the inept hands of Rick Berman et al. I`ll likely watch it for Simon Pegg and to see how a non-canon writer interprets the Star Trek universe.
  44. Profile photo of jocie1314
    jocie1314 Female 18-29
    11 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 4:48 pm
    That wasn`t a trailer, that was a teaser. Theres a difference. I got all excited over nothing. Poo.
  45. Profile photo of DMDekoth
    DMDekoth Male 70 & Over
    888 posts
    February 24, 2008 at 10:22 pm
    Judging from the trailer - and only the trailer - this movie will gross approximately one million three hundred thousand four hundred and thirty six dollars and fifty six cents. The general reviews will be positive with exactly nine negative reviews (under 50% score)

    What? Oh.. It`s just a crappy trailer. You don`t know if it`s going to be good OR bad. The trailer doesn`t tell you ANYTHING!

  46. Profile photo of Gregoryn95
    Gregoryn95 Male 13-17
    153 posts
    February 27, 2008 at 11:48 am
    "and then if you like action movies and what not star trek is probably the worst choice out of any movie, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1eFdUSna... hell the "fight" scenes in Disney movies are better than Star treks, and these are the only two things star trek has"

    You.....do realize that that was the 60`s? age of pre-pretty colors and special effects and graphics TV`s and films? I`m sorry that that was too slow and un-actiont come on, if you knew ANYTHING AT ALL about star trek you know that this was a sloppy thorwn together project because of a short period for production, etc. Plus, they had a really low budget, that`s why they came up with the transporter.

  47. Profile photo of Sabre200000
    Sabre200000 Male 18-29
    1039 posts
    February 27, 2008 at 2:17 pm
    All the recent remakes haven`t been bad. Spiderman, X-Men, Batman...so I have some hopes for this.

Leave a Reply