The best in arts & entertainment, news, pop culture, and your mom since 2002.

[Total: 49    Average: 3.3/5]
29 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 9982
Rating: 3.3
Category: Entertainment
Date: 02/20/08 12:05 AM

29 Responses to How to Make an iPod Nanoscope

  1. Profile photo of antdow3
    antdow3 Male 18-29
    946 posts
    February 19, 2008 at 7:01 pm
    Link: How to Make an iPod Nanoscope - Watch films on your iPod Nano more easily. Kinda defeats the point of the Nano though, doesn`t it?
  2. Profile photo of Tyrizzle
    Tyrizzle Male 18-29
    908 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:09 am
    ...Might as well get those cool goggles that make you look like you are an idiot...but make it look like a 65 inch screen
  3. Profile photo of Tyrizzle
    Tyrizzle Male 18-29
    908 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:09 am


    Those

  4. Profile photo of xboxman
    xboxman Male 13-17
    381 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:10 am
    All ipods always look the same... sure theres some creativity, but they beat the hell out of it until they cannot make anymore money.
  5. Profile photo of KoalaMeatPie
    KoalaMeatPie Male 18-29
    2578 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:26 am
    Nothing innovative about this.
    The Sega Game Gear had a "Mega wide gear" lense.
    http://www.modojo.com/media/features/76/...

    Plus, it`s a Nano, the only people who buy those are morons. You can fit less songs and it costs just as much as any other mp3 player which can fit 20-40 gbs worth of music.

    "But it`s so small!"

    Just like your pea Sized brain you fu¢king Australopithecine.

  6. Profile photo of shadow50001
    shadow50001 Male 18-29
    377 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:48 am
    Makes an ipod nano even more useless. good job I thought apple had it as useless as possible.
  7. Profile photo of Mani-Jac
    Mani-Jac Male 40-49
    805 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:48 am
    An Ipod nano isn`t a phone but you get the idea:

    http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=26930

  8. Profile photo of BikerTeen
    BikerTeen Male 13-17
    2113 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 3:31 am
    not bad
  9. Profile photo of Bellatrix391
    Bellatrix391 Female 13-17
    176 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 5:48 am
    Nah, I`d rather watch it on my 90" projector screen ta.
  10. Profile photo of the_windy
    the_windy Female 18-29
    1589 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 10:36 am
    OR you could NOT be cheap and go out and BUY or RENT the movie you want to see. :O Try a video store like Blockbuster, they are really good with those sort of things.
  11. Profile photo of magerune
    magerune Male 18-29
    80 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 11:05 am
    WHO the hell is going to carry that around? Honestly it would be cheaper to just buy a cheap ass 20" TV screen and a cheap ass DvD player instead of paying for an Ipod Nano that is not only useless because of the small hard drive space and tiny screen but even more impractical with the use of this monster screen magnifier.
  12. Profile photo of StoogegirlSi
    StoogegirlSi Female 18-29
    202 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 11:19 am
    Or, you know, you can hold it closer. It`s what I do with my Ipod Classic (cause, you see, Nano`s suck.)
  13. Profile photo of Wey_Pooh
    Wey_Pooh Male 18-29
    1004 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 11:49 am
    Duh. if you wanted to look like an idiot, just hold the nano 1 inch from your face.
  14. Profile photo of Midas-Method
    Midas-Method Male 18-29
    46 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 12:53 pm
    It`s not really a how-to guide but... Hey, the music from Chariots of Fire never gets old.
  15. Profile photo of nacha3
    nacha3 Male 18-29
    6 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 1:09 pm
    Or, you could go buy an Archos (archos.com) 605 wifi. It`s 80 gig, 4.3" touch screen (buttons too), optional web browser, can play all windows formats and you can buy a pair of plug-in`s; one for movies, one for all iTunes stuff. It`s bigger than a iPod but for $400 ($320 on Amazon) it has more than the Touch.
  16. Profile photo of antdow3
    antdow3 Male 18-29
    946 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 2:14 pm
    ^are you on commission?^
  17. Profile photo of mlchris
    mlchris Female 18-29
    920 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 4:02 pm
    stupidest.thing.ever.
  18. Profile photo of wowibrandon
    wowibrandon Male 13-17
    822 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 5:33 pm
    i`d lose it
  19. Profile photo of lakawaka
    lakawaka Female 13-17
    52 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 7:43 pm
    hey that movie was zoolander
  20. Profile photo of angelicamber
    angelicamber Female 18-29
    1572 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 8:02 pm
    ....who would do that?
  21. Profile photo of VomitStorm
    VomitStorm Male 18-29
    97 posts
    February 20, 2008 at 11:49 pm
    i`d just buy some really thick glasses
  22. Profile photo of alimander
    alimander Female 18-29
    182 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 6:46 am
    I hate to say it, but I think nanos are quite good
  23. Profile photo of HorsesRule
    HorsesRule Female 13-17
    368 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 3:20 pm
    how come the movie or whatever was upside down???

    i have the same nano and it plays the movie right

  24. Profile photo of Axium
    Axium Male 18-29
    296 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 3:20 pm
    It`s a proof of concept, not meant to be practical. Sheesh, people on this website are morons.
  25. Profile photo of Wewoo
    Wewoo Female 13-17
    435 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 6:51 pm
    "I hate to say it, but I think nanos are quite good"

    Me too.

  26. Profile photo of Howler81
    Howler81 Male 30-39
    323 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 7:16 pm
    Wow. That was an incredibly long video to show that little things look bigger when put behind a magnifying glass. Does that concept really deserve the "Chariots of Fire" theme? Really?
  27. Profile photo of bdiekh2
    bdiekh2 Male 18-29
    81 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 7:19 pm
    zoolander!!
    pointless, but cool
  28. Profile photo of KoalaMeatPie
    KoalaMeatPie Male 18-29
    2578 posts
    February 21, 2008 at 10:33 pm
    Both people who said that nanos where quite good are both Females, one 15 years old, the other between 13 and 17 with a "Cute" avatar.

    You like them, you don`t know much about them other then it`s fashionable.

    When you say a song "sucks" you mean you don`t like it, you wouldn`t know if the people have talent or not.

  29. Profile photo of PringleMan
    PringleMan Female 13-17
    1356 posts
    October 5, 2011 at 4:20 pm
    it`s witchcraft!!! burn the witch!

Leave a Reply