Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
I find this hilarious how this guy hasnt read the title...
and i hate that if they just went with those original pictures, those celebrities would still look fine. there was no point for all the alterations
Are they nuts?"
Lmao, Clayboy, I thought the exact same thing. I was like "What the hell is this?"
and some of them don`t look so bad in the before shot. like kelly clarkson and beyonce.
Are they nuts?
Have you been living under a rock or just drating oblivious to everything you retard?
What really gets to me is im having a bad day and evrybodys acting like they hate me :(:(....
Of course magazines show us what beauty is, but I really doubt that self esteem problems come just from photoshopped people in magazines... The problem is that there really Are beautiful people around. That`s at least who I compare myself to.
Besides I think it just makes me happy to see beautiful people in magazines - I love to see all kinds of art and beauty, so why not people too.
And god, I hate these posts because they attract the giant crowds of people who say this is the biggest reason why we have a self conscious society. It`s not just because of photoshop. Even if photoshop didn`t exist we would have essentially the exact same self conscious society. Do you want to know why? The people still look good. I will admit, photoshop makes them look better, but they still have envious looks and that`s not going to change.
I thought the exact thing. We`ve been Double Photoshopped! O_O
... if so, that`s awesome.
tomolenko: The point of this is to show what the original photos looked like, before alteration. The differences are startling, yes?
It`s unfortunate they felt the need to slim down Kelly Clarkson; she looked just fine in her `before` pic.